Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Antifragile Performance of Manufacturing Systems through Predictive Maintenance
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Spatio-Structural Parameters of the Multiscan Video Signal for Improving Accuracy of Control over Object Geometric Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Calculation of Air-Gap Magnetic Field Distribution in IPMSMs with Mixed Eccentricity Accounting for Bridge Saturation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping Robot Singularities through the Monte Carlo Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Model-Based Design of Induction Motor Control System in MATLAB

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11957; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311957
by Tibor Krenicky 1,*, Yury Nikitin 2 and Pavol Božek 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11957; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311957
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper should be accepted after addressing the following minor comments. page 3 - line 2: add 'steady' just before the word 'mode' page-5 - line 2 after Eqn. (1) 

change definition of phi to 'flux vector' - current definition 'vector of currents' is confusing. 

Author Response

Thank you so much for your detailed reading and recommendations provided in the review. Your valuable comments helped us to improve the quality of our article.

Now, the proposed corrections are implemented in the article.

Reviewer 2 Report

1- The Novelty, objective and purpose of the research are not clearly defined.

2- Key findings are not elaborated in the abstract and conclusion.

3- Any comparison with existing models is not established. 

4-  Overall structure of the article is not structured considering readers' perspectives. 

5-  Overall, the problem statement is not defined. The authors need to clearly define the purpose of the research.

6- The article seriously needs to be overhauled in terms of the information provided, structure, key findings, any comparison with existing models, what are the advantages of the presented model.

 

Author Response

Thank you so much for the review and valuable comments aimed at improving the quality of our article. For more details, please see the attached file and the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have incorporated the comments highlighted. 

Back to TopTop