Next Article in Journal
Fieldwork and Field Trials in Hospitals: Co-Designing A Robotic Solution to Support Data Collection in Geriatric Assessment
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Torque and Force Induced by Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments during Root Canal Preparation: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Spectroscopic and Spectrometric Applications for the Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Vegetal Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decision Support for Removing Fractured Endodontic Instruments: A Patient-Specific Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study

by
Jayanandan Muruganandhan
1,
Govindarajan Sujatha
1,
Saravanan Poorni
2,
Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan
2,
Nezar Boreak
3,
Ahmed Al-Kahtani
4,
Mohammed Mashyakhy
3,
Hitesh Chohan
3,
Shilpa Bhandi
3,
A. Thirumal Raj
1,
Alessio Zanza
5,
Luca Testarelli
5 and
Shankargouda Patil
6,*
1
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600130, India
2
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600130, India
3
Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362 Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
6
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(7), 3045; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073045
Submission received: 7 March 2021 / Revised: 22 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 29 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Techniques in Endodontics)

Abstract

Dental pulp-capping is done to preserve vital teeth when the pulp is exposed due to caries, trauma or instrumentation. Various materials are used as pulp-capping agents. The introduction of newer materials requires scientific studies to assess their clinical efficacy. The study was designed as a split-mouth randomized analysis of four pulp-capping agents (calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine and EndoSequence root repair material (ERRM)). Based on selection criteria, 15 orthodontic patients requiring the extraction of four premolars (60 teeth total) were included in the study. After pulp-capping, the teeth were extracted after 8 weeks. We analyzed the extracted teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and histological sections to determine the quality of the dentinal bridge and the pulpal response. Ordinal scores were given based on the completeness of the dentinal bridge, the type of bridge and the degree of pulpal inflammation. Results were analyzed using a Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05) with post hoc Conover values being used when applicable. All four pulp-capping materials elicited dentinal bridge formation (60/60). MTA had the highest scores (10/15) in dentinal bridge formation followed by ERRM (8/15). Both materials showed more samples with complete dentinal bridges (9/15 each) and a favorable pulpal response (15/15). Teeth capped with calcium hydroxide showed more cases of incomplete bridge formation (9/15) and pulpal inflammation. These differences in dentinal bridge formation and pulpal inflammation were statistically significant (p 0.001 and p 0.00005, respectively), with post hoc tests revealing no significant differences between MTA and ERRM (p 0.49 and p 0.71, respectively). MTA and ERRM performed better than the other pulp-capping materials but did not differ significantly from each other. The individual preference for a pulp-capping material may be based on clinical efficacy and handling characteristics.
Keywords: Biodentine; calcium hydroxide; dentinal bridge; EndoSequence root repair material; mineral trioxide aggregate; pulp-capping; pulp vitality Biodentine; calcium hydroxide; dentinal bridge; EndoSequence root repair material; mineral trioxide aggregate; pulp-capping; pulp vitality

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muruganandhan, J.; Sujatha, G.; Poorni, S.; Srinivasan, M.R.; Boreak, N.; Al-Kahtani, A.; Mashyakhy, M.; Chohan, H.; Bhandi, S.; Raj, A.T.; et al. Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073045

AMA Style

Muruganandhan J, Sujatha G, Poorni S, Srinivasan MR, Boreak N, Al-Kahtani A, Mashyakhy M, Chohan H, Bhandi S, Raj AT, et al. Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(7):3045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muruganandhan, Jayanandan, Govindarajan Sujatha, Saravanan Poorni, Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan, Nezar Boreak, Ahmed Al-Kahtani, Mohammed Mashyakhy, Hitesh Chohan, Shilpa Bhandi, A. Thirumal Raj, and et al. 2021. "Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study" Applied Sciences 11, no. 7: 3045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073045

APA Style

Muruganandhan, J., Sujatha, G., Poorni, S., Srinivasan, M. R., Boreak, N., Al-Kahtani, A., Mashyakhy, M., Chohan, H., Bhandi, S., Raj, A. T., Zanza, A., Testarelli, L., & Patil, S. (2021). Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study. Applied Sciences, 11(7), 3045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop