Next Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Zhao, S.; Lee, S. Biomaterial-Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4 Used to Improve the Efficiency of Hyperthermia of Tumors in HepG2 Model. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2017
Next Article in Special Issue
The Glutamate Receptor Plays a Role in Defense against Botrytis cinerea through Electrical Signaling in Tomato
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) for Systemic Classification of Pop-Up Housing (PUH) Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptomics for Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under Cold Stress and after Rewarming
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/app112311123
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Understanding the Function of the PGIP Gene and the Research of Its Proteins for the Disease Resistance of Plants

by
Siqi Cheng
1,†,
Ruonan Li
1,†,
Lili Lin
1,†,
Haojie Shi
1,
Xunyan Liu
2,* and
Chao Yu
1,*
1
Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11123; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311123
Submission received: 22 October 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 19 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in the Molecular Biology of Vegetables)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) is an important plant biochemical anti-disease factor. PGIP has a leucine-rich repeat structure that can selectively bind and inhibit the activity of endo-polygalacturonase (endo-PG) in fungi, playing a key role in plant disease resistance. The regulation of PGIP in plant disease resistance has been well studied, and the effect of PGIP to increase disease resistance is clear. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the PGIP protein structure, the PGIP mechanism of plant disease resistance, and anti-disease activity by PGIP gene transfer. This overview should contribute to a better understanding of PGIP function and can help guide resistance breeding of PGIP for anti-disease effects.

1. Introduction

In the long-term survival battle against pathogenic microorganisms, plants have evolved a series of complex but effective defense systems that can rapidly respond to infection and disease [1]. Plants can produce structural anti-disease factors such as lignins, hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs), glucose-regulated proteins (GRPs), and biochemical anti-disease factors, such as polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIPs) and plasticity-related genes (PRGs), to deal with potential threats and disease. The rapid activation of defense responses is critically important for plants to resist infection by pathogenic bacteria [2,3]. To understand the mechanism of anti-disease systems in plants, relevant genes need to be identified and characterized. Anti-disease genes are also important for the selection and cultivation of anti-disease varieties of plants, so the study of these systems can facilitate the breeding and development of plants with improved anti-disease properties.
The plant cell wall is the first barrier to resist infection by pathogenic bacteria. Pathogens can secrete plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (PCWDEs) to infect the host, and in response, the host can produce several inhibitory proteins, such as polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) to resist the hydrolysis caused by these enzymes [4]. PGIP is mainly concentrated in the cell wall and the intimal system, and its ability to inhibit PG activity is positively correlated with plant disease resistance [2]. The oligogalacturonic acids may activate plant defense responses such as synthesis of phytoalexins, lignin, and ethylene, expression of proteinase inhibitor I, and production of reactive oxygen species [5]. PGIP is considered a key component of the plant immune response, inhibiting pathogen infection by preventing the activation of endo-polygalacturonase (PG) and subsequent cell wall degradation to limit the growth and colonization of fungi [6,7].
This review focuses on and discusses recent work to characterize the function of PGIP, the mechanism of PGIP-related disease resistance, and the use of genetic integration of PGIP for anti-disease practice.

2. Discovery of PGIP and Its Variety and Diversity

In 1971, Albershein and Anderson [8] discovered PGIP in protein extracts from cell cultures of pea, bean, tomato, and Acer platanoides, and presented evidence that PGIP is located in the plant cell wall. In 1993, Williamson et al. [9] purified the 38.5 kDa molecular weight PGIP from raspberry fruit. In 1994, Favaron et al. [10] separated and purified PGIP from germinated soybean seeds and successfully cloned the soybean PGIP gene for the first time. More recently, scientists have identified PGIP in paddy rice, European rape, Arabidopsis thaliana, alfalfa, mung bean, citrus, and sisal [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The NCBI database has published 400 full or partial sequences of PGIP from both monocotyledons and dicotyledons, but there have been few investigations into the function of these proteins to inhibit PG protein. Plants can have multiple PGIP genes. For example, Brassica napus L. has the most PGIPs found in a plant, with 17 BnPGIPs on different chromosomes [13]. Phaseolus vulgaris has at least five PGIPs on chromosome 10. Arabidopsis thaliana has two PGIPs, AtPGIP1 and AtPGIP2, on chromosome 5, encoding proteins that are 76.1% similar in amino acid sequence [11].
The expression level of PGIP varies among different plant species, different organs, and different stages of development. The expression level of PGIP protein is proportional to the plant’s anti-disease ability. Ruan et al. [18] used Western blotting to show a higher PGIP level in a wheat variety with good disease resistance, SW89-2598, than the level in a variety with poor resistance, 3626. Similarly, Chen et al. [19] showed via qRT-PCR that good resistant wheat variety YSBR1 has higher PGIP expression than a variety with poor resistance. Tobacco genetically integrated with the PGIP gene from Hypericum perforatum exhibited increased anti-disease ability [20]. A study of fungal resistance on two varieties of wheat found PGIP expression level proportional to the anti-disease ability [21]. For the same variety of wheat, different organs have different levels of PGIP, with the maximum in stems, a moderate amount in roots, and the lowest levels in leaves [22]. In the late period of plant development, the expression level and activity of PGIP in fruits are negatively correlated with maturity [23].

3. Structural Characteristics of PGIP Protein

The PGIP gene is universally present in animals, plants, and microorganisms and belongs to the LRR (leucine-rich repeat) protein superfamily. PGIP proteins have an LRR domain rich in cysteine, forming a pattern of LxxLxxLxxLxLSxNxGxIPxx [6,24]. The number of tandem duplications varies among plant species. There are 9 tandem duplications in PGIP from rice and wheat [25] and 11 in PGIP from sugar beets [24]. In a single plant, different PGIPs can have different functions. It is reported that 7 OsPGIPs share a common signaling peptide, and 9 to 11 LRR fragments contain a characteristic domain of xxLxLxx of PGIP. After folding to α-helix β-sheet and random curling secondary structure, it forms a coiled-like structure, making up a specified concave following the right-hand screw rule, responsible for the interaction between OsPGIP and PG from harmful pests. The seven OsPGIPs are all hydrophobic proteins, with good fat solubility, transmembrane structure, extracellular localization, and multiple N-glycosylation sites, making these proteins insoluble when expressed in E. coli [26]. The exposed LRR motif is critical for the affinity and specificity of PGIP [25,26,27,28].

4. Biological Function and Mechanism of Disease Resistance by PGIP

4.1. Biological Function of Disease Resistance by PGIP

Plants have evolved different types of PGIPs to defend against pathogen infection. PGIP is mainly concentrated in the cell wall and endomembrane system, where it can specifically recognize different PGs released by fungi and inactivate or lower the activity of PGs by protein–protein interaction [7]. PGIP has different inhibitory effects on pathogens that secrete different PGs [29]. The alignment and structural prediction of the amino acid sequences of PGIP and PG suggest the binding of PGIP and PG can be altered by changing single amino acids of PGIP, suggesting that PGIP has a high specificity and selectivity to various hosts [30]. The PvPGIP1/2 and PvPGIP3/4 of kidney bean inhibit fungi infection and pest damage, respectively, although they share 10 tandem duplications of LRR. The different inhibitory effects of these proteins are due to a change in a single amino acid, leading to a dramatic change in the interactive PG domain [27,31,32]. The interaction of PGIP and PG prevents plant cell wall degradation to maintain the integrity of the cell, thus limiting access to nutrients for pathogens and, finally, inhibiting pathogen growth and proliferation.

4.2. Regulation of PGIP Expression

PGIP gene expression is affected by pathogen infections, ethylene, injury, oligogalacturonides (OGs), and induction by jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, indicating the complex molecular regulation of PGIP [33,34,35]. Most PGIPs are expressed under the stimulation of pathogens [36,37], and different PGIPs have specific stimulating conditions. In rape, insect and mechanic damage can stimulate the high expression of Bnpgip1, with little effects of fungi and cold induction. The expression of BnPGIP2 responds to fungi infection and injury but not insects, and jasmonic acid but not salicylic acid stimulates both genes [13]. In strawberry, there is high PGIP induction after inoculation with B. cinerea, indicating that PGIP plays a role in defense [38] (Table 1). Under the stimulation of fungi, the expression of OsPGIP7 decreases, but OsPGIP4 gradually increases and lasts a relatively long time [36]. Devoto et al. [39] cloned the promoter of PGIP-1 in soybean and found it is activated by injury but not chemicals or pathogen infection [39]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtPGIP1 is regulated by OGs, but not by ethylene, salicylic acid, or methyl jasmonate. AtPGIP2 is regulated by methyl jasmonate, COI1, and JARI gene product but not by OGs [11]. Treatment of strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis L.) with chitosan and methyl jasmonate for more than 48 h effectively inhibited grey mold incidence and was accompanied by the up-regulation of FcPGIP1 and FcPGIP2 [40]. Proteomics analysis revealed a high expression of AcPGIP after infection of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa “Hayward”) by B. cinerea [41]. After biological and abiotic stress treatment, the expression level of different OsPGIPs in rice showed significant changes with an overall significant increase in expression level, suggesting rice can improve its stress resistance by regulating the expression of OsPGIPs under stress conditions [26].
During pathogen infection, PGIPs can interact with pathogen PGs, eventually leading to the accumulation of OGs [29]. OGs function as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) that is recognized by the receptor wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) to induce host immunity [53]. This can activate the defense system of plants in the model of pathogen-related resolution-associated molecular patterns (RAMPs), such as the accumulation of anti-disease factors, deposition of callose, and increased NO/ROS [54]. Benedetti et al. [29] detected a high level of OGs in the PGIP-PG transgene family by the negative ion exchange chromatography pulse method, with the resistance of transgene material toward various types of fungi. Studies have reported that the application of trimeric OGs activates the immune response to resist necrotrophic pathogens and nematodes [5]. These results indicate that OGs can act as RAMPs and initiate the PTI immune pathway to regulate gene expression and defend against pathogenic fungi and other diseases. PGIPs inhibit the endogenous PGs of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum but also stimulate programmed death dependent on calcium [55] When a plant is infected with pathogens, plant cells can rapidly release and accumulate ROS, leading to a change in cellular pH and the production of Ca2+ ion, which can stimulate the synthesis of defense-related proteins and plant antitoxins as second messengers and cause the death of adjacent cells [56].

5. Application of PGIP in Plant Disease Resistance Genetic Engineering

The PGIP anti-disease effect has been confirmed in a series of in vivo experiments. PGIP-mediated fungi resistance has been shown in various important cash crops, such as grapes [57,58], papaya [59], potatoes [51], alfalfa [15], cotton [60], green beans [6,28,61], tomatoes [62], peas [63], mandarin orange [64], tobacco [65], and Arabidopsis [66]. PGIP expression does not affect plant phenotype or inhibit plant growth in sugar beet [67] or tobacco [67]. Thus, PGIP should be able to be used to improve plant disease resistance by overexpressing active PGIPs or by strengthening the specific recognition and inhibitory effect of native PGIPs by altering amino acid residues at recognition sites [68]. Consistently, the overexpression of GhPGIP1 enhanced the resistance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to Verticillium and Fusarium wilts, and resistance was severely reduced when the gene was silenced [60]. The overexpression of HpPGIP led to the upregulation of key genes involved in hormone signaling, microRNA-based gene silencing, homeostasis of reactive oxygen species, and the phenylpropanoid pathway [20]. There were increased expression levels of disease resistance-related genes, including VvPGIP in fruit inoculated with B. cinerea infection [47].
PvPGIP exhibits strong inhibition toward most PGs from different pathogens [69]. P vPGIP2 can be transferred to Brassica napus via Agrobacterium, and in vitro experiments show that crude extract from transgenic strains can inhibit 29–37% PG activity in rhizoctonia, with an increased effect seen with the progression of infection and delayed lesion expansion in the transgenic strain [70]. Wang et al. [71] overexpressed soybean GmPGIP3 in wheat and found the transgenic strain exhibited elevated resistance to wheat root rot. The overexpression of OsPGIP1 that can inhibit the PG from sheath blight allowed rice to efficiently limit the expansion of Rhizoctonia solani, with no effect on agronomic characteristics [19,72,73]. Similarly, the expression of PGIP1 from cotton in Arabidopsis strengthened its resistance to fungal disease caused by Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium, and silencing PGIP1 in cotton increased its sensitivity to these fungi [60]. AcPGIP silencing enhanced kiwifruit’s susceptibility to B. cinerea [52]. The expression of PGIP from sugar beet (BvPGIP1) can protect transgenic tobacco against Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium, and Botrytis cinerea [24]. The overexpression of OsPGIP2 can efficiently inhibit Sclerotinia disease and enhance resistance to Sclerotinia in Brassica napus [74]. Overall, many studies show that increasing the protein levels of PGIPs can allow plants to effectively resist many common pathogenic fungi [75] (Table 2).
PGIPS can also inhibit bacterial diseases in different crops [45,73,78,83] (Table 3). Expressing PGIP from pear in transgenic grape can improve its resistance against Peel’s disease caused by Xylella fastidiosa [84]. The overexpression of PGIP2 from Chinese cabbage in transgenic cabbage or tobacco can enhance the resistance to soft rot bacteria [45]. PGIP from tomato stem extract can inhibit PGs from Ralstonia solanacearum [83]. A recent study on rice showed that the PGIP4-containing chromosome is related to the resistance of bacterial stripe disease, with increased susceptibility to bacterial stripe disease in rice when the PGIP4 is silenced by RNAi [78]. RNA-seq analysis revealed that the OsPGIP1-mediated resistance of bacterial leaf streak is induced by PG of Xoc and other pathogenicity factors, and is primed by the activated expression of PR genes, cell wall defense-associated genes and regulators, and an accumulation of JA [85]. Increased PGIP in potato improved the resistance of Ralstonia solanacearum [86]. Overall, it is clear that PGIPs contribute to defense responses and inhibit bacterial disease [83].

6. Future Prospects

Although there has been progress in cloning PGIP genes and investigating PGIP structure, function, expression, and regulation, future work is required to determine how to effectively integrate the heterologous PGIP gene into a plant genome for stable expression to improve plant disease resistance. In addition, more studies are required to characterize differences in the mechanism of action, expression conditions, expression effects, and antimicrobial effects for different PGIPs. The sequence similarity of PGIP genes in homologous plants is relatively high, and there is almost no difference in the protein sequence of coding products. Therefore, the study of PGIP gene sequence difference is not enough to explain the expression difference among PGIP gene family members, nor to reveal the difference of PGIP activity among varieties. More and more scholars believe that the most important thing is the difference in gene expression regulation. In addition, the same PGIP may have different activities to inhibit PG. Changing a single amino acid of PGIP can change the specificity of the PG–PGIP interaction. Therefore, the overexpression of PGIP genes can improve plant disease resistance; for example, the overexpression of active PGIPs genes or changing the amino acid residues of inhibition recognition sites will make PGIP produce stronger specific recognition and inhibition intensity [27,31,32]. This increases plant resistance [68]. Traditional disease resistance genetic breeding is not enough to solve the problem of plant disease resistance, but with the continuous improvement of genetic engineering, molecular biology, and transformation system, transgenic breeding can be used to transform a wide range of resistance genes into plants, so as to effectively improve plant disease resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and C.Y.; methodology, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; software, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; validation, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; formal analysis, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; investigation, H.S.; resources, H.S.; data curation, H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; writing—review and editing, S.C., R.L. and L.L.; visualization, H.S.; supervision, X.L. and C.Y.; project administration, X.L. and C.Y.; funding acquisition, X.L. and C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000800 and 2019YFD1000300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31872105, 31972221, 32002048, and 31801862), the Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (LGN18C020005), and the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. LY19C150008, LY19C140004, LY21C150002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000800 and 2019YFD1000300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31872105, 31972221, 32002048, and 31801862), the Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (LGN18C020005), and the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.LY19C150008, LY19C140004, LY21C150002).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gimenez, E.; Salinas, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide research on plant defense against biotic stresses as improvement for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 2018, 10, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ge, T.; Huang, X.; Xie, R. Recent advances in polygalacturonase gene in fruit tree species. Plant Physiol. J. 2019, 55, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rathinam, M.; Mishra, P.; Vasudevan, M.; Budhwar, R.; Sreevathsa, R. Comparative transcriptome analysis of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) and one of its wild relatives Cajanus platycarpus (Benth.) Maesen. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Somai-Jemmali, L.; Siah, A.; Har Ba Oui, K.; Fergaoui, S.; Randoux, B.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Halama, P.; Reignault, P.; Hamada, W. Correlation of fungal penetration, CWDE activities and defense-related genes with resistance of durum wheat cultivars to Zymoseptoria tritici. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 100, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Davidsson, P.; Broberg, M.; Kariola, T.; Sipari, N.; Pirhonen, M.; Palva, E.T. Short oligogalacturonides induce pathogen resistance-associated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Di Matteo, A.; Bonivento, D.; Tsernoglou, D.; Federici, L.; Cervone, F. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) in plant defence: A structural view. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kalunke, R.M.; Tundo, S.; Benedetti, M.; Cervone, F.; De Lorenzo, G.; D’Ovidio, R. An update on polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP), a leucine-rich repeat protein that protects crop plants against pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Albersheim, P.; Anderson, A.J. Proteins from plant cell walls inhibit polygalacturonases secreted by plant pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Williamson, B.; Johnston, D.J.; Ramanathan, V.; Mcnicol, R.J. A Polygalacturonase inhibitor from immature raspberry fruits: A possible new approach to grey mould control. Acta Hortic. 1993, 352, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Favaron, F.; D’Ovidio, R.; Porceddu, E.; Alghisi, P. Purification and molecular characterization of a soybean polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein. Planta 1994, 195, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferrari, S.; Vairo, D.; Ausubel, F.M.; Cervone, F.; De Lorenzo, G. Tandemly duplicated Arabidopsis genes that encode polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins are regulated coordinately by different signal transduction pathways in response to fungal infection. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jang, S.; Lee, B.; Kim, C. The OsFOR1 gene encodes a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) that regulates floral organ number in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 53, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, R.; Rimmer, R.; Yu, M.; Sharpe, A.G.; Séguin-Swartz, G.; Lydiate, D.; Hegedus, D.D. Two Brassica napus polygalacturonase inhibitory protein genes are expressed at different levels in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Planta 2003, 217, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chotechung, S.; Somta, P.; Chen, J.; Yimram, T.; Chen, X.; Srinives, P. A gene encoding a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) is a candidate gene for bruchid (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 1673–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gui, Z.; Gao, J.; Xin, N.; Wang, Y.; Pi, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, Q.; Li, X. Association of polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein gene 2 (MsPGIP2) to common leaf spot resistance in alfalfa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 144, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, B.; Luo, Q.; Tan, Y.; Yan, H. B cell epitopes analysis and prokaryotic expression of PGIP in citrus. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 18–22, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Yang, Z.; Li, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhou, W. Cloning and Expression Analysis of Polygalacturo- nase-inhibiting Protein in Sisal. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2019, 40, 2397–2404. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruan, Q.; Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y. The relationships between the scab-resistance and PGIP of wheat varieties. J. Plant Protec. 2002, 29, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, X.; Yu, C.; Zhang, L.; Xu, B.; Xu, J. Overexpression of OsPGIP1 enhances rice resistance to sheath blight. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hou, W.; Singh, R.K.; Zhao, P.; Martins, V.; Aguilar, E.; Canto, T.; Tenllado, F.; Franklin, G.; Dias, A.C.P. Overexpression of polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) gene from Hypericum perforatum alters expression of multiple defense-related genes and modulates recalcitrance to Agrobacterium tumefaciens in tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 253, 153268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ruan, Q.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, Y. Advance in the reseach of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins on disease-resistance of plants. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2000, 17, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhou, L.; Ruan, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Immunocytochemical localization of Polgalacturonase inhibiting protein in wheat. J. Sichuan Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2000, 37, 916–923. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gui, Z.; Gao, J.; Yuan, Q. Progress of researches on polygalacturonase inhibiting protein. J. Tianjin Agric. Univ. 2011, 18, 6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, H.; Smigocki, A.C. Sugar beet polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins with 11 LRRs confer Rhizoctonia, Fusarium and Botrytis resistance in Nicotiana plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 102, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, W.; Mu, J.; Li, A.; Wang, H.; Kong, L. Identification of a wheat polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein involved in Fusarium head blight resistance. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015, 141, 731–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, X.; Tang, T.; Li, L.; Cheng, C.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zuo, S. Analysis on the structures of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins and the expression profile of its encoding genes in rice. Acta Agron. Sin. 2020, 1884–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaewwongwal, A.; Chen, J.; Somta, P.; Kongjaimun, A.; Yimram, T.; Chen, X.; Srinives, P. Novel alleles of two tightly linked genes encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (VrPGIP1 and VrPGIP2) associated with the Br Locus that confer bruchid (Callosobruchus spp.) resistance to mungbean (Vigna radiata) accession V2709. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chiu, T.; Behari, A.; Chartron, J.W.; Putman, A.; Li, Y. Exploring the potential of engineering polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein as an ecological, friendly, and nontoxic pest control agent. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021, 118, 3200–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Benedetti, M.; Pontiggia, D.; Raggi, S.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Scaloni, F.; Ferrari, S.; Ausubel, F.M.; Cervone, F.; De Lorenzo, G. Plant immunity triggered by engineered in vivo release of oligogalacturonides, damage-associated molecular patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5533–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Bonivento, D.; Pontiggia, D.; Matteo, A.D.; Fernandez-Recio, J.; Federici, L. Crystal structure of the endopolygalacturonase from the phytopathogenic fungus Colletotrichum lupini and its interaction with polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2007, 70, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Frati, F.; Galletti, R.; Lorenzo, G.D.; Salerno, G.; Conti, E. Activity of endo-polygalacturonases in mirid bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) and their inhibition by plant cell wall proteins (PGIPs). Eur. J. Entomol. 2006, 103, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casasoli, M.; Federici, L.; Spinelli, F.; Di Matteo, A.; Vella, N.; Scaloni, F.; Fernandez-Recio, J.; Cervone, F.; De Lorenzo, G. Integration of evolutionary and desolvation energy analysis identifies functional sites in a plant immunity protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 7666–7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, Y.; Wang, J. Advances of the studies on plant promoter. Chin. Bull. Bot. 1998, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruan, Q.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Y. PGIP accumulation in wheat in response to induction with salicylic acid. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2000, 6, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, G.; Liang, E.; Lan, X.; Li, Q.; Qian, J.; Tao, H.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, N.; Zuo, S.; Chen, J.; et al. ZmPGIP3 gene encodes a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein that enhances resistance to sheath blight in rice. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1732–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Adhikari, B.N.; Savory, E.A.; Vaillancourt, B.; Childs, K.L.; Hamilton, J.P.; Day, B.; Buell, C.R. Expression profiling of Cucumis sativus in response to infection by Pseudoperonospora cubensis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kobayashi, Y.; Ohyama, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ito, H.; Luchi, S.; Fujita, M.; Zhao, C.R. STOP2 activates transcription of several genes for Al- and low pH-tolerance that are regulated by STOP1 in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mehli, L.; Schaart, J.G.; Kjellsen, T.D.; Tran, D.H.; Salentijn, E.M.J.; Schouten, H.J.; Iversen, T.H. A gene encoding a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) shows developmental regulation and pathogen-induced expression in strawberry. New Phytol. 2004, 163, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Devoto, A.; Leckie, F.; Lupotto, E.; Lorenzo, C. The promoter of a gene encoding a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein of Phaseolus vulgaris L. is activated by wounding but not by elicitors or pathogen infection. Planta 1998, 205, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Saavedra, G.M.; Sanfuentes, E.; Figueroa, P.M.; Figueroa, C.R. Independent Preharvest Applications of Methyl Jasmonate and Chitosan Elicit Differential Upregulation of Defense-Related Genes with Reduced Incidence of Gray Mold Decay during Postharvest Storage of Fragaria chiloensis Fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, J.; Sui, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. Proteomic analysis of kiwifruit in response to the postharvest pathogen, Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Berger, D.K.; Oelofse, D.; Arendse, M.S.; Du Plessis, E.; Dubery, I.A. Bean polygalacturonase inhibitor protein-1 (PGIP-1) inhibits polygalacturonases from Stenocarpella maydis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 57, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bashi, Z.D.; Rimmer, S.R.; Khachatourians, G.G.; Hegedus, D.D. Brassica napus polygalacturonase inhibitor proteins inhibit Sclerotinia sclerotiorum polygalacturonase enzymatic and necrotizing activities and delay symptoms in transgenic plants. Can. J. Microbiol. 2013, 59, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, F.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Huang, L.; Yang, Q. Cloning and Characterization of a PGIP-Encoding Gene from Solanum torvum. Agric. Sci. China 2010, 9, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hwang, B.H.; Bae, H.; Lim, H.S.; Kim, K.B.; Kim, S.J.; Im, M.H.; Park, B.S.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, J. Overexpression of polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 2 (PGIP2) of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) increased resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 103, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Joubert, D.A.; de Lorenzo, G.; Vivier, M.A. Regulation of the grapevine polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein encoding gene: Expression pattern, induction profile and promoter analysis. J. Plant Res. 2013, 126, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dong, T.; Zheng, T.; Fu, W.; Guan, L.; Jia, H.; Fang, J. The Effect of Ethylene on the Color Change and Resistance to Botrytis cinerea Infection in ‘Kyoho’ Grape Fruits. Foods 2020, 9, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Farina, A.; Rocchi, V.; Janni, M.; Benedettelli, S.; Lorenzo, G.D.; D’Ovidio, R. The bean polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 2 (PvPGIP2) is highly conserved in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm and related species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. D’Ovidio, R.; Roberti, S.; Di Giovanni, M.; Capodicasa, C.; Melaragni, M.; Sella, L.; Tosi, P.; Favaron, F. The characterization of the soybean polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (Pgip) gene family reveals that a single member is responsible for the activity detected in soybean tissues. Planta 2006, 224, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kalunke, R.M.; Ce Nci, A.; Volpi, C.; O’Sullivan, D.M. The pgip family in soybean and three other legume species: Evidence for a birth-and-death model of evolution. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Machinandiarena, M.F.; Olivieri, F.P.; Daleo, G.R.; Oliva, C.R. Isolation and characterization of a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from potato leaves. Accumulation in response tosalicylic acid, wounding and infection. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.X.; Chen, M.; Miao, Y.X.; Li, Q.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, W.L.; Lan, J.B.; Liu, Y.Q. The role of AcPGIP in the kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) response to Botrytis cinerea. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021, 48, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Brutus, A.; Sicilia, F.; Macone, A.; Cervone, F.; Lorenzo, G.D. A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9452–9457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Ferrari, S.; Savatin, D.V.; Sicilia, F.; Gramegna, G.; Cervone, F.; De Lorenzo, G. Oligogalacturonides: Plant damage-associated molecular patterns and regulators of growth and development. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zuppini, A.; Navazio, L.; Sella, L.; Castiglioni, C.; Favaron, F.; Mariani, P. An endopolygalacturonase from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum induces calcium-mediated signaling and programmed cell death in soybean cells. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI 2005, 18, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zurbriggen, M.D.; Carrillo, N.; Tognetti, V.B.; Melzer, M.; Peisker, M.; Hause, B.; Hajirezaei, M.R. Chloroplast-generated reactive oxygen species play a major role in localized cell death during the non-host interaction between tobacco and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant J. 2009, 60, 962–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lorenzo, G.D.; D’Ovidio, R.; Cervone, F. The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2001, 39, 313–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Joubert, D.A.; Kars, I.; Wagemakers, L.; Bergmann, C.; Kemp, G.; Vivier, M.A.; Kan, J.V. A polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from grapevine reduces the symptoms of the endopolygalacturonase BcPG2 from Botrytis cinerea in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves without any evidence for in vitro interaction. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Broetto, S.G.; Fabi, J.P.; Nascimento, J. Cloning and expression analysis of two putative papaya genes encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 104, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, N.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Wang, P.; Li, X.; Pei, Y.; Li, F.; Hou, Y. Molecular evidence for the involvement of a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein, GhPGIP1, in enhanced resistance to Verticillium and Fusarium wilts in cotton. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. D’Ovidio, R.; Raiola, A.; Capodicasa, C.; Devoto, A.; Pontiggia, D.; Roberti, S.; Galletti, R.; Conti, E.; O’Sullivan, D.; De Lorenzo, G. Characterization of the complex locus of bean encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins reveals subfunctionalization for defense against fungi and insects. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2424–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Powell, A.; Kan, J.V.; Have, A.T.; Visser, J.; Labavitch, J.M. Transgenic expression of pear PGIP in tomato limits fungal colonization. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Richter, A.; Jacobsen, H.J.; de Kathen, A.; de Lorenzo, G.; Briviba, K.; Hain, R.; Ramsay, G.; Kiesecker, H. Transgenic peas (Pisum sativum) expressing polygalacturonase inhibiting protein from raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and stilbene synthase from grape (Vitis vinifera). Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hu, A.; Long, Q.; He, Y.; Li, Q.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, C.; Zou, X.; Xiu, L.; Peng, A. Cloning and expression analysis of the citrus bacterial canker-related gene CsPGIP in citrus. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2019, 52, 639–650. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, C.; Feng, C.; Wang, J.; Kong, F.; Sun, W.; Wang, F. Cloning, expression analysis and recombinant expression of a gene encoding a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum. Heliyon 2016, 2, e00110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ferrari, S.; Sella, L.; Janni, M.; De Lorenzo, G.; Favaron, F.; D’Ovidio, R. Transgenic expression of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins in Arabidopsis and wheat increases resistance to the flower pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Plant Biol. 2012, 14 (Suppl. S1), 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alexandersson, E.; Becker, J.V.; Jacobson, D.; Nguema-Ona, E.; Steyn, C.; Denby, K.J.; Vivier, M.A. Constitutive expression of a grapevine polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein affects gene expression and cell wall properties in uninfected tobacco. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Benedetti, M.; Bastianelli, E.; Salvi, G.; Lorenzo, G.D.; Caprari, C. Artificial evolution corrects a repulsive amino acid in polygalacturonase inhibiting proteins (PGIPs). J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 93, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Borras-Hidalgo, O.; Caprari, C.; Hernandez-Estevez, I.; Lorenzo, G.D.; Cervone, F. A gene for plant protection: Expression of a bean polygalacturonase inhibitor in tobacco confers a strong resistance against Rhizoctonia solani and two oomycetes. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Akhgari, A.B.; Motallebi, M.; Zamani, M.R. Bean polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein expressed in transgenic Brassica napus inhibits polygalacturonase from its fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Protect. Sci. 2012, 48, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, A.; Wei, X.; Wei, R.; Liang, D.; Zhang, Z. GmPGIP3 enhanced resistance to both take-all and common root rot diseases in transgenic wheat. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Jia, H.; Wang, H.; Dong, C.; Zhang, J.; Tao, J. Function of VtPGIP in pathogenic fungus resistance of Vitis thunbergii. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Wang, R.; Lu, L.; Pan, X.; Hu, Z.; Ling, F.; Yan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y. Functional analysis of OsPGIP1 in rice sheath blight resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Z.; Wan, L.; Xin, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dong, F.; Hong, D.; Yang, G. Overexpression of OsPGIP2 confers Sclerotinia sclerotiorum resistance in Brassica napus through increased activation of defense mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3141–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, N.; Ma, X.; Zhou, S.; Ping, W.; Yun, S.; Li, X.; Hou, Y. Molecular and functional characterization of a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from Cynanchum komarovii that confers fungal resistance in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e1005510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, X.; Zhu, X.; Tooley, P.; Zhang, X. Cloning and functional analysis of three genes encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins from Capsicum annuum and transgenic CaPGIP1 in tobacco in relation to increased resistance to two fungal pathogens. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 81, 379–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; He, Z.; Huang, B.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zuo, S. Amino acid substitutions in a polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (OsPGIP2) increases sheath blight resistance in rice. Rice 2019, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Feng, C.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; Yuan, B.; Ding, X.; Yao, F.; Chu, Z. The polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 4 (OsPGIP4), a potential component of the qBlsr5a locus, confers resistance to bacterial leaf streak in rice. Planta 2016, 243, 1297–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akagi, A.; Engelberth, J.; Stotz, H.U. Interaction between polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein and jasmonic acid during defense activation in tomato against Botrytis cinerea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 128, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Q.; Yan, Q.; Yuan, X.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, R.; Xue, C.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, X. Two polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (VrPGIP) of Vigna radiata confer resistance to bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.). J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 258–259, 153376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hu, D.; Dai, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Fang, R.; Zhao, W.; Li, L.; Lin, Q.; Li, L. Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of the polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) gene in mulberry. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 30, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Matsaunyane, L.B.; Oelofse, D.; Dubery, I.A. In silico analysis of the polygalacturonase inhibiting protein 1 from apple, Malus domestica. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Schacht, T.; Unger, C.; Pich, A.; Wydra, K. Endo- and exopolygalacturonases of Ralstonia solanacearum are inhibited by polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) activity in tomato stem extracts. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2011, 49, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aguero, C.B.; Uratsu, S.L.; Greve, C.; Powell, A.L.; Labavitch, J.M.; Meredith, C.P.; Dandekar, A.M. Evaluation of tolerance to Pierce’s disease and Botrytis in transgenic plants of Vitis vinifera L. expressing the pear PGIP gene. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wu, T.; Peng, C.; Li, B.; Wu, W.; Kong, L.; Li, F.; Chu, Z.; Liu, F.; Ding, X. OsPGIP1-Mediated Resistance to Bacterial Leaf Streak in Rice is Beyond Responsive to the Polygalacturonase of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola. Rice 2019, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Moslemkhani, C.; Mozafari, J.; Bakhsh, M.S.; Goltape, E.M. Molecular characterization of defense-related genes, induced against Ralstonia solanacearum in potato. Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 54, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. PGIP regulatory factors tested in different systems against PGs.
Table 1. PGIP regulatory factors tested in different systems against PGs.
GeneSystem for ExpressionMediated FactorEnhanced Resistance
Arabidopsis thalianaAtPGIP1Arabidopsis thalianaOligogalacturonides (OGs) [11]Botrytis cinerea
AtPGIP2 Jasmonate [11]Botrytis cinerea
Kidney bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)		PvPGIP1 Wounded [6]Aspergillus niger [42]
PvPGIP3Nicotiana benthamianOligogalacturonides (OGs) [6]
Rapeseed
(Brassica napus)		BnPGIP1 Jasmonate, insect herbivory, mechanical wounding [43]Sclerotinia sclerotiorium
BnPGIP2 Jasmonate, defense hormones, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorium infection
Solanum torvumStPGIP Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliae [44]
Wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.)		TaPGIP3 IAA, MeJA, SA, and ABAFusarium graminearum [25]
TaPGIP2
Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis)BrPGIP1 JA [45]Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc)
BrPGIP2CabbageJA [45]Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc)
BrPGIP5 JA [45]Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc)
Grape
(Vitis vinifera L.)		VvPGIP1TobaccoAuxin, salicylic acid and sugar
treatment, wounding, and pathogen infection [46,47]		Botrytis cinerea
Soybean
(Glycine max L.)		GmPGIP1PVX/Nicotiana benthamianaPVX/Nicotiana benthamiana[48]
GmPGIP2 [31]
GmPGIP3PVX/Nicotiana benthamianaPVX/Nicotiana benthamianaBotrytis cinerea, Botrytis aclada [31,49]
GmPGIP4 [31]
GmPGIP7 [50]
Potato leaves (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Spunta) Salicylic acid, wounding, and infectionPhytophthora infestans [51]
Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis)AcPGIP Botrytis cinerea infection [41]Botrytis cinerea [52]
Strawberry
(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)		PGIPB. cinerea or woundingBotrytis cinerea wounding [38]
Table
Table 2. PGIP tested in different systems against fungal PGs.
Table 2. PGIP tested in different systems against fungal PGs.
GeneSystem for ExpressionPG Inhibition
St. John’s wort
(Hypericum perforatum)		HpPGIP Agrobacterium tumefaciens [20]
Pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.)		CaPGIP1 Alternaria alternate, Colletotrichum nicotianae [76]
CaPGIP2 Alternaria alternate, Colletotrichum nicotianae [76]
Rice
(Oryza sativa L.)		OsPGIP2RapeseedSclerotinia sclerotiorium, SsPG3 and SsPG6 [74]
OsPGIP1RiceSheath blight, Rhizoctonia solani [73,77]
OsPGIP4RiceXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola [78]
Pear
(Pyrus bretschneideri)		pPGIPTomatoBotrytis cinerea [79]
Mungbean
(Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek)		VrPGIP1MungbeanCallosobruchus chinensis [14] the polygalacturonase in Callosobruchus maculatus [80]
VrPGIP2MungbeanThe polygalacturonase in Callosobruchus maculatus [14,80]
Alfalfa
(Medicago sativa)		MsPGIP2Medicago sativaPseudopeziza medicaginis (Lib.) Sacc. [15]
Mulberry (Morus alba L.)MPGIP [81]
Apple
(Malus domestica)		MdPGIP1Tobacco and potatoFungal polygalacturonases [82]
Cotton
(Gossypium hirsutum)		GhPGIP1Gossypium hirsutum, Arabidopsis thalianaVerticillium dahliae, Fusarium oxysporum [60]
Sugar beet
(Beta vulgaris)		BvPGIP1Nicotiana benthamianaFusarium solani, Botrytis cinerea, and Rhizoctonia solani [24]
BvPGIP2Nicotiana benthamianaFusarium solani, Botrytis cinerea [24]
Tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum)		NtPGIPEscherichia coli
(DE3)		Phytophthora capsica [65]
Table
Table 3. PGIP genes studied in various systems against bacterial stresses.
Table 3. PGIP genes studied in various systems against bacterial stresses.
GeneSystem for ExpressionEnhanced Resistance
Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis)BrPGIP1 Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc) [45]
BrPGIP2CabbagePectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc) [45]
BrPGIP3 Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc) [45]
BrPGIP4 Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc) [45]
BrPGIP5 Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. Carotovorum (Pcc) [45]
Pear
(Pyrus bretschneideri)		pPGIPGrapeXylella fastidiosa [84]
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)PGIPTomato stemRalstonia solanacearum [83]
Rice
(Oryza sativa L.)		OsPGIP1RiceBacterial leaf streak [85]
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Spunta)PGIPPotatoRalstonia solanacearum [86]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, S.; Li, R.; Lin, L.; Shi, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, C. Recent Advances in Understanding the Function of the PGIP Gene and the Research of Its Proteins for the Disease Resistance of Plants. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11123. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311123

AMA Style

Cheng S, Li R, Lin L, Shi H, Liu X, Yu C. Recent Advances in Understanding the Function of the PGIP Gene and the Research of Its Proteins for the Disease Resistance of Plants. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(23):11123. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Siqi, Ruonan Li, Lili Lin, Haojie Shi, Xunyan Liu, and Chao Yu. 2021. "Recent Advances in Understanding the Function of the PGIP Gene and the Research of Its Proteins for the Disease Resistance of Plants" Applied Sciences 11, no. 23: 11123. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311123

APA Style

Cheng, S., Li, R., Lin, L., Shi, H., Liu, X., & Yu, C. (2021). Recent Advances in Understanding the Function of the PGIP Gene and the Research of Its Proteins for the Disease Resistance of Plants. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11123. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop