Evaluation of Linearization Methods for Control of the Pendubot
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Major remarks:
- In my opinion abstract and especially Introduction could be extended and more informative. I propose to set aside a separate section for "related works".
Minor remarks:
- At the end of equations should be comma or full stop (now, sometimes we have nothing).
- Table 2: It could be interesting to see also standard deviations (next to means). Maybe, you can even consider to add box plot for each algorithm (one plot for each parameter with 3 (Algorithms) box plots next to each other).
- Fig 6-8: What are red points on these figures?
- Why did you set the step size equal to 2 degrees in simulation studies
- How did you select the exemplary successful initial condition? Did you try other values?
- I propose alphabetical order of references.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
With interest, I read the manuscript. It is appreciated that the manuscript is easy to follow and not too long. The message is clear and of interest to the community. The authors proposed a paper titled " Evaluation of linearization methods for control of the Pendubot". The proposed paper seemed to be promising in terms of computational simplicity and classification accuracy. I would accept it in this present form.
Author Response
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the comments and suggestions which allowed us to better clarify and emphasize our paper, and, as a consequence, improve the resultant quality of the manuscript.
