Next Article in Journal
Semi-Precast Segmental Bridge Construction Method: Experimental Investigation on the Shear Transfer in Longitudinal and Transverse Direction
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical and Experimental Insights into the Tandem Mannich—Electrophilic Amination Reaction: Synthesis of Safirinium Dyes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Maturity and Odor Emissions in the Process of Combined Composting of Kitchen Waste and Garden Waste

1
College of Resource and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5500; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125500
Submission received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 2 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 June 2021 / Published: 14 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

:
With the development of urbanization, kitchen waste and garden waste have become an important part of municipal solid waste (MSW), which is in urgent need of resource treatment. This study investigated the impacts of garden waste as auxiliary materials on maturity and odor emissions (NH3 and H2S) during kitchen waste composting. The result showed that the combined composting product of kitchen waste and garden waste achieved the maturity effect, and the co-composting effect was better than that of separate composting of kitchen waste. Meanwhile, compared with the separate composting treatment of kitchen waste, the co-composting treatment of kitchen waste and garden waste can effectively reduce the cumulative emissions of H2S by more than 85%, and effectively reduce the cumulative emissions of NH3 by more than 75%. This study provides a technical reference for the green fertilizer utilization of kitchen waste and garden waste.

1. Introduction

With the development of the economy, the continuous promotion of urbanization and the implementation of the new policy of waste classification, the resource treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) had been widely carried out [1]. At present, kitchen waste (KW) and garden waste (GW) were the main MSW related to our life. In particular, first-tier cities, with a high degree of urbanization and high population density, result in large and concentrated production of KW and GW, which was in urgent need of resource treatment.
KW is difficult to place in landfill and incinerate directly because of its high organic matter and moisture content, ease of corruption, and low calorific value [2]. Composting can not only realize the harmlessness and reduction in KW, but also produce organic fertilizer for agriculture, which is an effective way to treat KW [3]. However, due to the high moisture content and nitrogen content of the KW, composting the KW alone will produce a large amount of leachate and affect the composting process. Adding auxiliary materials to KW can not only adjust the moisture content and carbon–nitrogen ratio of the original materials, but also adjust the matrix porosity of the pile [4,5]. Therefore, the addition of auxiliary materials is conducive to ventilation and oxygen supply, ensuring rapid and efficient composting [6].
The addition of auxiliary (structure-forming) materials will not only affect the maturity of composting, but also affect the gas emission in the composting process [6]. At present, the main problem restricting the development of composting plants in China is the effect of the odor discharged in the composting process on the surrounding residents [7]. China has clearly defined limits for NH3 and H2S emissions from composting plants. The most concentrated odors emitted during the composting of KW are NH3 and H2S [8]. Among them, H2S contributes the most to the concentration of odor [9]. The massive emission of NH3 and H2S during the composting process not only produced odor pollution, but also reduced the nutrient content of the compost. The NH3 volatilized with the high temperature of the compost is the main reason for the loss of nitrogen during the composting process, accounting for about 20% to 60% of the total nitrogen [10].
Composting is an aerobic process in which bad aeration conditions can occur, being the main reason for the generation of H2S. About 9~43% of volatile sulfur compounds are lost in the form of H2S, which is characterized by a low detection odor threshold and high odor activity [11,12,13]. Therefore, serious odor pollution will occur even the concentration of H2S is low. Adding auxiliary materials to the compost can improve the porosity of the pile, which is conducive to ventilation and oxygen supply, thereby reducing the emission of odor. Studies have shown that adding auxiliary materials to compost can reduce odor emission to varying degrees [3,14].
Agricultural wastes such as straw and fungus chaff have been proven to have significant effects as auxiliary materials [15,16]. However, as a large number of KW is produced in cities, the transportation cost of agricultural waste as auxiliary materials is high. Meanwhile, the large amount of GW produced in cities together with KW has become a potential choice for composting.
Therefore, this research attempts to build a technology for reducing pollution and improving the maturity of the KW composting based on GW as an auxiliary material. Through the co-composting treatment of GW and KW, the maturity and gas emission of compost samples were measured. The feasibility of co-composting of GW and KW was verified by integrating the effects of pollution gas emission and product ripening in the composting process, in order to provide technical support for the green fertilizer utilization of kitchen waste.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Composting Materials

KW came from the waste collection and transfer station of Qingdao Agricultural University. KW consists of 45% vegetables, 29% fruits, 10% staples, 7% bones, eggshells and shells, 5% meat and 4% other food (wet weight). GW was collected from tree pruning and leaves in the campus of Qingdao Agricultural University. The initial moisture content of KW was about 70.6 ± 2.2%, and that of GW was about 4.9 ± 1.4%.

2.2. Experimental Protocol

Two treatments were designed in this study. In treatment 1 (T1), KW was used as a single material for composting. Additionally, in treatment 2 (T2), 15% GW and 85% KW were used as raw materials for composting. The proportion of raw materials in co-composting treatment is widely used for composting in practice [7]. The composting experiment was conducted for 21 days, with turning on the 3rd day and 7th day of the first week and weekly thereafter. About 150 g of solid samples were collected after each turning to analyze the physicochemical properties of the compost material. All testing of waste samples in this study was conducted in triplicate. Mean values and standard deviations of triplicate samples are shown in this study.

2.3. Experimental Device

A 20 L cylindrical self-made composting reactor (Figure 1) was used in this project. The reactor was surrounded by a foam layer to prevent heat loss. There are holes in the top of the lid to collect the gas released each day and to insert the temperature detector. An air pump aeration system was used to provide a continuous aeration rate of 0.4 L/kg dry weight (DM) every minute to maintain aerobic compost.

2.4. Analytic Methods

The temperature of the reactor was read by a temperature sensor inserted into the reactor. NH3 was absorbed by boric acid with a mass fraction of 2%, and then titrated with dilute sulfuric acid at a standard concentration. H2S was determined using a portable biogas analyzer (BioGAS 5000).
Aqueous extract: 10.0 g of the frozen wet sample was weighed and added with deionized water at the ratio of 1:10 (w/v) for extraction, oscillated for 30 min, stood for 10 min and then filtered. The aqueous extract was taken to measure pH, EC and the germination index (GI). The pH value was measured by an S-3C pH meter, and EC was measured by a DDS-11A conductivity meter. The GI value was determined by taking 5 mL of the aqueous extract above in a Petri dish with 10 seeds of Xinlimei radish covered with filter paper and incubating it in an incubator (SHP-250, Jinghong, Shanghai) at (20 ± 1) °C for 48 h in the dark. The root length and germination rate of the seeds were determined.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Temperature

During the whole composting process, temperatures of all the treated samples showed a similar change of rapid rise followed by a slow decrease (Figure 2). Due to the rapid degradation of organic matter in the compost material, a large amount of heat was generated [17], which had a good killing effect on Acaris eggs, Escherichia coli and other harmful pathogens. Previous studies proved that the thermophilic phase was reached faster due to the high decomposition of organic matter [18]. All treatments significantly increased to peak temperature (about 60 °C) on day 3 to day 4, and then gradually decreased. Due to the redistribution of organic material and associated microorganisms by turning, the temperature of all treatments increased again on day 7 after turning. Over the next two weeks, the temperature followed a similar pattern of rising and then falling. At the end of the composting process, the temperature of all treatments was basically reduced to the ambient temperature, indicating that the compost had reached the ripening stage.

3.2. pH and EC

Different treatments had little influence on the pH value of the composting process. The pH value of all treatments increased significantly in the first week and finally maintained a stable stage of 7 to 8 (Figure 3). In the early stage of the co-composting of KW and GW, the pH value of the materials was about 4 due to the acidification phenomenon of KW during the early storage. With a rapid biodegradation of easily degradable organic matter, small molecular organic acids were produced. With the rise of temperature, organic acid volatilization and mineralization of organic nitrogen will gradually increase pH [19]. In this study, due to the higher temperature and continuous aeration accelerating the generation of NH3 during the high temperature phase, organic acids volatilized and neutralized more thoroughly, resulting in the initial increase in substrate pH. In the later stage of composting, the pH value of all treatments no longer increased in a large range due to the increased activity of nitrifying bacteria, which promoted the conversion of a small amount of NH4+ into NO3 [20].
The EC value is an indicator of the soluble salt concentration in the aqueous extract of compost. Too high an EC value can cause toxic effects on crops [21,22]. The EC value for T1 treatment increased significantly in the first few days. This may be due to the rapid decomposition and mineralization of organic matter into small molecules, which increased the salt ion content. A downward trend was observed in the two subsequent treatments, which was due to the volatilization of organic acids and NH4+ and humification [23,24]. By the end of composting, the EC values of all treatments were less than 3 mS/cm, meeting the safe composting standard (<4 mS/cm). Compared with T1 treatment, T2 treatment can effectively reduce the EC value within 21 days of composting, which may be due to the improvement of physical and chemical properties of the composting materials, thus accelerating the humification process.

3.3. Germination Index (GI)

The toxicity test of a water extract of compost on plant seeds is one of the important methods to test compost ripening degree [25]. The germination index (GI) of all treatments showed an increasing trend during the composting process (Figure 4). The elevated GI may be related to the removal of toxic substances (such as small molecular organic acids and NH4+) and the formation of humus. After 21 days of composting, GI was higher than 80% in T2 treatments, indicating that the composting product was free of plant toxicity and ripe [25]. Compared with the single composting treatment of KW (T1), the co-composting treatment of KW and GW (T2) had a higher GI value, and the products were less toxic to plants.

3.4. NH3 Emission

The NH3 emissions from all treatments mainly occurred during the high temperature period (Figure 5). This was mainly due to the strong mineralization of organic nitrogen into NH4+, which was further converted into NH3 under high temperature and alkaline conditions [10]. Therefore, NH3 emission peaks were observed for each treatment around day 7 of composting. As the temperature decreases, NH3 emissions then drop to a lower concentration. As mentioned above, turning can reactivate related microorganisms, restore biodegradation of organic matter, and regulate matrix porosity, thus facilitating the occurrence of NH3 re-discharge.
Compared with T1 treatment, T2 treatment can effectively reduce the cumulative NH3 emission by more than 75% (Figure 5). The main reason was that the addition of GW improved the C/N ratio and biodegradation efficiency of the matrix in the composting process. In fact, T1 treatment inhibited biodegradation efficiency and prolonged the high temperature period (Figure 2), resulting in increased NH3 production after each turning of the heap to activate the compost matrix between day 7 and day 21.

3.5. H2S Emission

The H2S emission rate of all treatments increased first and then decreased, and finally was basically close to zero (Figure 6). H2S emission in the whole composting process mainly occurred in the first 7 days, accounting for about 80% of the total H2S emission. Similar to the results of previous studies [26], H2S emissions in the process of KW composting were mainly concentrated in the early stage, which may be mainly due to the intense microbial activities in the early stage of the reactor and the rapid temperature rise that consumes oxygen in the reactor, leading to the emergence of the local anaerobic environment. Other research also indicated that the main cause of generation of H2S emission during composting was the lack of aeration [27]. Thus, the use of bulking agent provided porosity to the organic material to be composted. There is a peak of H2S emissions after turning, which was consistent with the results of existing studies [9]. Compared with T1 treatment, T2 treatment can effectively reduce the cumulative H2S emission by more than 85%. The main reason was that the addition of GW improves the permeability of the matrix in the process of composting, improved the hypoxia condition in the material and inhibits the generation of H2S.

4. Conclusions

The co-composting of kitchen waste and garden waste can achieve the ripening effect, and the co-composting effect was better than the single composting treatment of kitchen waste. The pH and EC values of each treatment meet the safe application of organic fertilizer at the end of composting. GI was higher than 80% in co-composting treatment, indicating that the composting product was free of plant toxicity and ripe. Compared with the separate composting treatment of kitchen waste, the co-composting treatment of can effectively reduce the cumulative H2S emission by more than 85%, and effectively reduce the cumulative NH3 emission by more than 75%.

Author Contributions

Data curation, B.Z. and F.F.; investigation, C.G., M.Y., M.Z. and Y.L.; methodology, C.G. and M.Y.; resources, Y.S.; supervision, Y.L.; writing—original draft, B.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.F. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “the Science and Technology Plan Project Foundation of Guizhou province, grant number 20182341 and 20191452” and “the High-level Talent Research Fund of Qingdao Agricultural University”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hafid, H.; Rahman, N.; Shah, U.; Baharuddin, A.; Ariff, A. Feasibility of Using Kitchen Waste as Future Substrate for Bioethanol Production: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 671–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Karimi, S.; Karimi, K. Efficient ethanol production from kitchen and garden wastes and biogas from the residues. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yuan, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, G.; Luo, W.; Zhang, D. Use of additive and pretreatment to control odors in municipal kitchen waste during aerobic composting. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 37, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, N. Effect of low initial C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine manure with rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Z.; Gao, M.; Wang, Z.; She, Z.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C. Comparison of physicochemical parameters during the forced-aeration composting of sewage sludge and maize straw at different initial C/N ratios. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2013, 63, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Domingo, J.L.; Nadal, M. Domestic waste composting facilities: A review of human health risks. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, F.; Li, G.; Yang, Q.; Luo, W. Effect of bulking agents on maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 1393–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, T.; Schuchardt, F.; Li, G.; Guo, R.; Zhao, Y. Effect of C/N ratio, aeration rate and moisture content on ammonia and greenhouse gas emission during the composting. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zang, B.; Li, S.; Michel, F.; Li, G.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y. Effects of mix ratio, moisture content and aeration rate on sulfur odor emissions during pig manure composting. Waste Manag. 2016, 56, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pagans, E.; Barrena, R.; Font, X.; Sanchez, A. Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 1534–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Drennan, M.F.; Distefano, T.D. Characterization of the curing process from high-solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Li, D.; Yi, Z. Emission of volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) during aerobic decomposition of food wastes. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 5065–5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Schuchardt, F.; Li, G.; Yang, J.; Yang, Q. Emission of volatile sulfur compounds during composting of municipal solid waste (MSW). Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Toledo, M.; Marquez, P.; Siles, J.; Chica, A.; Martin, M. Co-composting of sewage sludge and eggplant waste at full scale: Feasibility study to valorize eggplant waste and minimize the odoriferous impact of sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 247, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, J.-M. The Effect of Different C/N Ratios on the Composting of Pig Manure and Edible Fungus Residue with Rice Bran. Compos. Sci. Util. 2016, 25, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuan, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhang, D.; Shen, Y.; Ma, R.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Li, G. Biodrying performance and combustion characteristics related to bulking agent amendments during kitchen waste biodrying. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 284, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jolanun, B.; Towprayoon, S.; Chiemchaisri, C. Aeration improvement in fed batch composting of vegetable and fruit wastes. Environ. Prog. 2008, 27, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toledo, M.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Siles, J.A.; Martin, M.A. Full-scale composting of sewage sludge and market waste: Stability monitoring and odor dispersion modeling. Environ. Res. 2018, 167, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Masó, M.; Blasi, A.B. Evaluation of composting as a strategy for managing organic wastes from a municipal market in Nicaragua. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5120–5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, G.; Kong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Li, G. Evolution of phytotoxicity during the active phase of co-composting of chicken manure, tobacco powder and mushroom substrate. Waste Manag. 2020, 114, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sellami, F.; Hachicha, S.; Chtourou, M.; Medhioub, K.; Ammar, E. Maturity assessment of composted olive mill wastes using UV spectra and humification parameters. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6900–6907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, C. A negative-pressure aeration system for composting food wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7651–7656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, G.F.; Wu, Q.T.; Wong, J.C.; Nagar, B.B. Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1834–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan, J.; Chadwick, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, G.; Chen, S.; Luo, W.; Du, L.; He, S.; Peng, S. Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag. 2016, 56, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Neyla, S.; Soulwene, K.; Fadhel, M.; Naceur, J.; Meriam, M.; Abdennaceur, H.; Hadda, O. Microbiological parameters and maturity degree during composting of Posidonia oceanica residues mixed with vegetable wastes in semi-arid pedo-climatic condition. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1452–1458. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dhar, B.R.; Youssef, E.; Nakhla, G.; Ray, M.B. Pretreatment of municipal waste activated sludge for volatile sulfur compounds control in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 3776–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Toledo, M.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Pena, A.; Siles, J.A.; Martin, M.A. Co-composting of chicken manure, alperujo, olive leaves/pruning and cereal straw at full-scale: Compost quality assessment and odour emission. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 139, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of composting device.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of composting device.
Applsci 11 05500 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of temperature during composting.
Figure 2. Evolution of temperature during composting.
Applsci 11 05500 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of pH and EC during composting.
Figure 3. Evolution of pH and EC during composting.
Applsci 11 05500 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of germination index during composting.
Figure 4. Evolution of germination index during composting.
Applsci 11 05500 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of NH3 during composting.
Figure 5. Evolution of NH3 during composting.
Applsci 11 05500 g005
Figure 6. Evolution of H2S during composting.
Figure 6. Evolution of H2S during composting.
Applsci 11 05500 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B.; Fan, F.; Guo, C.; Yu, M.; Zhao, M.; Song, Y.; Li, Y. Evaluation of Maturity and Odor Emissions in the Process of Combined Composting of Kitchen Waste and Garden Waste. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5500. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125500

AMA Style

Zhang B, Fan F, Guo C, Yu M, Zhao M, Song Y, Li Y. Evaluation of Maturity and Odor Emissions in the Process of Combined Composting of Kitchen Waste and Garden Waste. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(12):5500. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Bangxi, Feifei Fan, Chao Guo, Mingji Yu, Mingcan Zhao, Yuan Song, and Yun Li. 2021. "Evaluation of Maturity and Odor Emissions in the Process of Combined Composting of Kitchen Waste and Garden Waste" Applied Sciences 11, no. 12: 5500. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop