Next Article in Journal
Estimating Health Impacts Due to the Reduction of Particulate Air Pollution from the Household Sector Expected under Various Scenarios
Next Article in Special Issue
A Green’s Function for Acoustic Problems in Pekeris Waveguide Using a Rigorous Image Source Method
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Evaluation of Ginkgo biloba L. Extract Loaded into Carboxymethyl Cellulose Sublingual Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acoustic Reconstruction of Eszterháza Opera House Following New Archival Research
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Effect on MIO-M1 Cell Viability: Setup Validation and Standing Waves Analysis

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010271
by Irais Poblete-Naredo 1, Mario Ibrahin Gutierrez 2,*, Diana Estela Mendoza-Sánchez 3, Arturo Ortega 1, Arnulfo Albores 1, Josefina Gutiérrez-Martínez 4, Lorenzo Leija 5 and Arturo Vera 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010271
Submission received: 25 November 2020 / Revised: 23 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modelling, Simulation and Data Analysis in Acoustical Problems Ⅱ)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The work is well written and try yo put some light on the problems affecting the repeatability of ultrasonic traetment of cell cultures with in vitro experiments.

However I think that the solution proposed by the authors for reducing standing wave effect is a little bit far from a real useful set-up. My experience suggest that filling completely the well containing the cell culture and sealing it with some soft silicone caps ( i.e without air trapped) can be more easy to realize and would it be more appropriate for discriminate from the standing waves effects and the vibrations, as it was already done in the two experimental set-up proposed for ultrasonic treatment.

I think that the authors should investigate also this scheme in order to provide a well defined set-up.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached document 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

The methodology and results are sound. 

 

Author Response

We are thankful for your comment.

Back to TopTop