Next Article in Journal
Performance of a Solar Absorption Cooling System Using Nanofluids and a Membrane-Based Microchannel Desorber
Next Article in Special Issue
Intelligent Computer-Aided Diagnostic System for Magnifying Endoscopy Images of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Robust Force Position Control for Flexible Active Prosthetic Knee Using Gait Trajectory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visual and Quantitative Evaluation of Amyloid Brain PET Image Synthesis with Generative Adversarial Network
Open AccessArticle

Machine Learning Classifiers Evaluation for Automatic Karyogram Generation from G-Banded Metaphase Images

Intelligent Systems Department, Polytechnic University of Victoria, Tamaulipas 87138, Mexico
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(8), 2758;
Received: 13 March 2020 / Revised: 2 April 2020 / Accepted: 4 April 2020 / Published: 16 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Medical Image Processing)
This work proposes the evaluation of a set of algorithms of machine learning and the selection of the most appropriate one for the classification of segmented chromosomes images acquired using the Giemsa staining technique (G-banding). The evaluation and selection of the best classification algorithms was carried out over a dataset of 119 Q-banding chromosomes images, and the obtained results were then applied to a dataset of 24 G-band chromosomes images, manually classified by an expert of the Laboratory of Cytogenetic of the Children’s Hospital of Tamaulipas. The results of evaluation of 51 classifiers yielded that the best classification accuracy for the selected features was obtained by a backpropagation neural network. One of the main contributions of this study is the proposal of a two-stage classification scheme based on the best classifier found by the initial evaluation. In stage 1, chromosome images are classified into three major groups. In stage 2, the output of phase 1 is used as the input of a multiclass classifier. Using this scheme, 82% of the IGB bank samples and 88% of the samples of a bank of images obtained with a Q-band available in the literature consisting of 119 chromosome studies were successfully classified. The proposed work is a part of an desktop application that allows cytogeneticist to automatically generate cytogenetic reports. View Full-Text
Keywords: machine learning; karyotype; image processing machine learning; karyotype; image processing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández-Mier, Y.; Nuño-Maganda, M.A.; Polanco-Martagón, S.; García-Chávez, M.R. Machine Learning Classifiers Evaluation for Automatic Karyogram Generation from G-Banded Metaphase Images. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2758.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop