An Enhanced Auxiliary Information-Based EWMA-t Chart for Monitoring the Process Mean
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors show that their simulation results suggest that the AIB-GWMA-t chart is more sensitive for detecting small process mean shifts than the AIB-EWMA-t chart.
The paper doesn't introduce much novelty and it seems just a simple comparison between methods.
There are few points that should have been explained in further details, for example, on page 5, line 195, the authors claim “An algorithm in R has been developed to calculate …..” Can authors provide that algorithm?
Adding a small discussion section on the potential problems/limits of the proposal would have also been beneficial.
Typos:
Keywords should be in alphabetical order;
Page 3, line 104, 109, 132…: put “where” to the left side;
Page 3, line 126: rewrite as “the statistic T*_i. is defined by” ;
Page 9, line 240: The authors state that “The ARL1 values for the AIB-GWMA-t charts decrease as the value of q , d , or r increases. ” It is good or not? The authors must explain in a better way.
Author Response
Please see the attachment!
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Well done! The paper is almost perfectly written. However, some improvements are possible.
Please introduce research hypotheses, along with research questions, in the paper.
Do not finish a chapter with a figure or table.
Please explain all used notations in the equations. Repeat explanations if necessary.
Why did you chose sample sizes 5 and 10 (page 6)? Such decisions should be elaborated in more details.
Consider uploading Figure 2 in higher resolution.
Author Response
Please see the attachment!
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Everything is perfect. Thank you!