Next Article in Journal
A Query Understanding Framework for Earth Data Discovery
Next Article in Special Issue
BIM-LEAN as a Methodology to Save Execution Costs in Building Construction—An Experience under the Spanish Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Support Vector Machine (SVM) in the Sentiment Analysis of Twitter DataSet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Project Managers’ Transversal Competences Using Building Information Modeling
Article

Productivity Analysis of Documentation Based on 3D Model in Plant Facility Construction Project

by 1 and 2,*
1
M Design co., Ltd R&D Center, 13, Jeongui-ro 7-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05835, Korea
2
Department of Digital Architecture and Urban Engineering, Hanyang Cyber University, 220 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031126
Received: 18 December 2019 / Revised: 17 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 January 2020 / Published: 7 February 2020
In off-site construction, production of fabrication drawings has a very important impact on productivity. Documentation using 3D model is one of the great advantages of using BIM. Despite the importance of documentation based on 3D model, productivity analysis studies compared to traditional 2D-drawing-based documentation method are difficult to find in existing studies. In addition, empirical research on the effects of recycling 3D model and libraries information is hard to find. The purpose of this study is to analyze the productivity of documentation using 3D model in the fabrication phase. First, productivity data for the 2D-drawing-based documentation method and 3D-model-based documentation method for steel frame prefabrication of EPC project were acquired for each module. Second, additional time for tasks—such as 3D modeling and document review—were investigated to conduct the comparative analysis on the productivity of the two documentation methods. The results quantitatively show the productivity of 3D-model-based documentation and the learning effect of recycling 3D libraries. View Full-Text
Keywords: productivity; 2D drawing; 3D model; documentation; learning effect productivity; 2D drawing; 3D model; documentation; learning effect
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoo, M.; Ham, N. Productivity Analysis of Documentation Based on 3D Model in Plant Facility Construction Project. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031126

AMA Style

Yoo M, Ham N. Productivity Analysis of Documentation Based on 3D Model in Plant Facility Construction Project. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(3):1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoo, Mooyoung, and Namhyuk Ham. 2020. "Productivity Analysis of Documentation Based on 3D Model in Plant Facility Construction Project" Applied Sciences 10, no. 3: 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031126

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop