Next Article in Journal
The Control of Volume Expansion and Porosity in Carbon Block by Carbon Black (CB) Addition for Increasing Thermal Conductivity
Next Article in Special Issue
Interface Transparency Issues in Teleoperation
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility of Using Aeration to Cool Wheat Stored in Slovenia: A Predictive Modeling Approach Using Historical Weather Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
MERLIN a Cognitive Architecture for Service Robots
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evolution of a Cognitive Architecture for Social Robots: Integrating Behaviors and Symbolic Knowledge

Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(17), 6067; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176067
by Francisco Martín 1,*, Francisco J. Rodríguez Lera 2, Jonatan Ginés 3 and Vicente Matellán 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(17), 6067; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176067
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 24 August 2020 / Accepted: 26 August 2020 / Published: 1 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive Robotics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors describe the evolution of a cognitive architecture for social robots.

In its original form, this architecture was based on low level behaviors, based on a finite state machine. The authors describe how the successive requirements of the system had necessitated the addition of planning capabilities and symbolic representation. These two components of the robot cognitive architecture are integrated through a working memory that is implemented as a distributed graph. The system made it possible for the authors to reuse it across different robot hardware types such as four legged Aibo robots or wheeled robots such as Pepper or TIAGo.

Overall, this is a well written paper that presents the evolution and the rationale of the design of a robot cognitive architecture. As the paper is an overview, its focus is not on novel algorithmic content but on the insights gained through the evolution of the system. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well written, however it would be useful for the reader if the authors  laid out the disadvantages of the current state of the art and the improvements with the proposed approach 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop