Next Article in Journal
Failure Warning at the End of Service-Life of Lead–Acid Batteries for Backup Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Optimized Location Aided Routing Protocol for VANET Based on Rectangular Estimation of Position
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 17
10.3390/app10175761
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanism and Investment Analysis of Recycling Gasoline Solvent with Mineral Powder for Asphalt Cleaning

by
Fusong Wang
1,2,
Hechuan Li
1,*,
Qi Jiang
1,
Chao Yang
1,
Yuanyuan Li
1 and
Shaopeng Wu
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(17), 5761; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175761
Submission received: 2 August 2020 / Revised: 13 August 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gasoline is widely used as a powerful organic solvent to remove asphalt residuals in road engineering applications; however, it is also known as a non-renewable fuel resource. This research aims to employ mineral powder to mitigate the consumption of gasoline in asphalt binder cleaning process, and evaluate its mechanism, environmental and economic benefits. Based on X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) spectra, X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectra and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) detection, the microstructure and composition of mineral powder was investigated after adsorbing asphalt components from gasoline solution. Fourier Transform Infrared spectra (FTIR) were used to calculate the adsorption efficiency. Moreover, the assessments of environmental and economic impacts of investigated approach were evaluated quantitatively. The results indicated that the interactions between mineral powder and asphalt binder have not changed the crystal phase, and the rough interface of mineral powder could adsorb approximately 4% asphalt binder from the gasoline solution according to the detection of Zn. The comparative analysis, regarding cost-effectiveness and environmental impacts, demonstrated that once 1 kg asphalt adsorbed by mineral powder, recycling gasoline with mineral powder, could reduce costs by 80% (CNY 57.10), energy use by 97% (352.88 MJ) and equivalent CO2 emission by 93% (23.95 kg).

1. Introduction

With the massive demand for infrastructural developments, the 21st century is witnessing a significant increase in asphalt pavement construction globally [1]. It is expected that 25 million kilometers of new pavements are going to be built before 2050 [2], more than 90% of which will be in developing countries [3]. Furthermore, according to the panel data from European Union, asphalt pavement construction has a prominent position for huge financial investments and resource consumption [4]. Consequently, researchers are increasingly focusing on environment-friendly and sustainable asphalt pavement constructions, especially in reducing both aggregate and fuel depletion [5], but ignoring the considerations involving the associated experimental operations and laboratory management.
From the perspective of laboratory management, associated administrators constantly highlight the operation safety and implementation disciplines in engineering education. Li assessed the risks in engineering laboratories by accident statistics and questionnaires, and proposing that people need to pay attention to the storage of inflammable and explosive substances and common safety training [6]. Gao advocated the workable strategies and practical considerations for vigorous developments of engineering laboratories under industry-oriented, world-oriented and future-oriented backgrounds [7]. For practical functions of laboratories, finishing the experiment should be set on a priority right; however, in the current context of sustainable development, it is simultaneously important to deal with experimental wastes environmentally. For example, the technicians in asphalt-related experiments not only take efforts to ensure experiment completion, but treat residuals also involved multiple works, such as cleaning and wiping out extra asphalt binder from experimental equipment.
Today, fossil fuels such as gasoline supply over 80% of the energy all over the world [8], but their reserves are expected to last for a limited period based on the current consumption rate [9]. Gasoline, besides being used as an energy supplier, is also commonly adopted in asphalt research laboratories as an organic solvent to remove asphalt binder from experimental devices, owing to its efficient and non-toxic characteristics [10]. Gasoline and bitumen are extracted from the petroleum crude oil as a distilled and residual product, respectively [11]. Therefore, asphalt binder displays good solubility in gasoline based on the ‘like dissolves like’ principle [12]. Gasoline can be used as an efficient organic solvent since it can attach to asphalt binder particles [13,14]. As for the chemical structure, gasoline is mainly composed of relatively lightweight hydrocarbons (C4–C12 molecules) [15], but the detailed content of different compositions usually varies based on the refining feed, operations and octane rating [16]. Considering the aforementioned trend for asphalt pavement construction, it is foreseeable that the consumption of gasoline would steadily become more significant.
Gasoline is commonly used worldwide in universities, enterprises and construction sites to remove the residuals of asphalt binder on laboratory equipment [17]. Furthermore, many other organic solvents are also available for this purpose, but most of them have heavily adverse effects to human health [18,19]. For example, carbon disulfide has a good asphalt dissolving effect, but constant exposure to this substance could lead to ischemic heart disease mortality [20]. Tetrachloromethane is also effective, but it is characterized by high cost, and negative impacts on human health are considerable [21]. Comparatively speaking, gasoline solvent is an appropriate solvent for asphalt cleaning with an acceptable price and low toxicity [22]. Nevertheless, gasoline is a valuable and valued resource in the current energy market. Therefore, recycling gasoline solvent not only saves the investments in purchasing chemical reagents, but also reduces the consumption of nonrenewable resources.
Mineral powder is an easily accessible raw material in asphalt laboratories with a low wholesale price (approximately CNY 450 per ton in China). It is widely used as a filler in asphalt mixture preparation [23], and plays a dominant role in enhancing binder adhesion to aggregates and increasing the stiffness module and stability of the asphalt mixture [24]. The main chemical components of mineral powder are calcium oxide and silicon oxide, and the particle size meets the specification for passing 200 mesh (0.075 mm) sieve. At low temperatures, mineral powder could affect the cohesive strengths of asphalt mortar [25]; at high temperatures, the rutting resistance and fatigue failure of the asphalt mixture would also be influenced by the mineral powder’s addition [26].
The composite interaction between asphalt binder and mineral powder enhances the workability of the asphalt mixture. In contrast, this interaction can also be utilized in disposing waste asphalt binder. In this study, a novel approach is proposed to use the mineral powder adsorbing part of the dissolved asphalt binder in gasoline, aiming to recycle the gasoline solvent used in asphalt research institutions. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) spectra and X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectra were adopted to verify the crystal phase and qualitative composition; after that, Fourier Transform Infrared spectra (FTIR) and Atomic Absorption Spectroscope (AAS) were used to estimate the adsorption efficiency by comparing the peak intensity and content of Zn. Furthermore, a laboratory case study evidenced the annual gasoline usage, and related financial investments and environmental impacts for the proposed method were assessed for China and Norway. Overall, the investigated solution can make a significant difference in saving fossil fuel resources for asphalt disposal.

2. Materials and Methods

In this study, asphalt binder with a penetration grade of Pen 60/80 (Hubei Guochuang Hi-tech Material Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) was investigated as the substance to be removed, the fundamental properties are listed in Table 1. This bituminous binder is largely employed in heavy traffic roads. The used #92 gasoline was supplied by Sinopec (Sinopec, Beijing, China). The mineral powder adopted was made of limestone with an average size of 48 µm, Table 2 shows its associated physical properties.
In order to analyze the absorbing strength, the experiment added mineral powder into mixed asphalt and gasoline solution whose sediment was then investigated further. Figure 1 depicts the sample preparation processes. Firstly, 10 g asphalt binder was dissolved in 150 mL gasoline contained in an Erlenmeyer flask, the process was accelerated by shaking the flask for 10 min and letting it rest for 60 min. Successively, 20 g of mineral was added into the solution, which rested for 30 min; afterwards, the sediment was extracted with suction filtration. Due to the complex composition of gasoline and asphalt, the components of both mineral powder and sediment were investigated as research objects for their relatively stable components and structures. Corresponding to the actual situation for asphalt cleaning works, all procedures for sample preparation were implemented under room temperature and normal pressure conditions. Pure mineral powder was labelled as sample A, the sediment from gasoline and mineral powder was labelled as sample B and the sediment from mineral powder, asphalt and gasoline was marked as Sample C.
There are three primary aims for this research: (1) verify the feasibility of using mineral powder to absorb asphalt; (2) explore the absorbance efficiency and mechanism of using mineral powder to absorb asphalt; (3) assess the environmental impacts and financial investment of using mineral powder. In order to address these problems, this study focused on the dissolving process and utilized XRD (BRUKER AXS GMBH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with D8 Advance specification to study samples’ crystal compositions [27]. XRF (Malvern Panalytical, Almelo, Netherland) method with Zetium specification was adopted to integrate the contents and compositions of samples [28]. The specification of the FTIR instrument used in the experiment was Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, Madison, WI, US), the conducted wavenumber range was 400–4000 cm−1 [29]. The AAS employed was CONTRAA-700 (Analytik Jena AG, Thuringia, Germany), and the samples were tested at 0.3 MPa under an argon atmosphere [30]. Additionally, a case study from Wuhan University of Technology was implemented to assess the cost and environmental impacts. Consulting the data from the China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2013 [31] and published literature [32,33,34,35,36], the extraction processes of gasoline and mineral powder were considered, and their comprehensive benefits were calculated and compared.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanism Performance

3.1.1. Crystal Phase of Absorbed Mineral Powder

In order to explore the changes after adsorbing the asphalt binder, the crystal phase was considered in the powder samples analyzed with XRD. Figure 2 shows the XRD spectra for three samples: A, B and C. The obtained peak (104°) belongs to calcite Ca6C6O18. All the specimens had a peak in correspondence of the same degree value, as well as a similar flow trend. This means the crystal phase of applied mineral powder is calcite Ca6C6O18. Moreover, the same regularities of three XRD spectra in Figure 2 indicate that after adding in pure gasoline (sample B) and adsorbing the asphalt binder from the solution (sample C), the mineral powder did not comprise any changes regarding the crystal phase.

3.1.2. Chemical Compositions of Absorbed Mineral Powder

The composition differences among the three samples were integrated by an XRF test. The detected substances and associated contents are listed in Table 3: CaO, SiO2 and Al2O3 accounted for nearly 90% of the whole composition. The limestone mineral composition fulfils the standard values according to previous literatures [35,37]. Although the three specimens have similar compounds content distributions, an evident difference can be found in Table 2 that only sample C contains a small percentage of ZnO due to the distillation treatments and following transport operations [36]; on the other hand, this demonstrates that the applied mineral powder and gasoline were not related to ZnO.

3.1.3. Qualitative Analysis by Functional Groups of Mineral Powder

Given the small amount of ZnO detected by XRF, the study applied AAS to obtain Zn contents in a pure asphalt binder and sample C, according to the standard GB/T 15337-2008. Based on the atomic vapor for a given characteristic line, AAS analysis achieved qualitative and quantitative analysis by assessing the degree of attenuation [38]. The results show that the concentration of Zn in pure a asphalt binder and sample C were 2.75 mg/kg and 48.36 mg/kg, respectively; this approximately corresponds to 0.005% for sample C and agreed well with the XRF result. Therefore, the AAS test also proves that the mineral powder adsorbed part of asphalt binder from the solution.
Afterwards, the study attempted to calculate the adsorption ratio by comparing the peak intensity in FTIR spectra for a pure asphalt binder and the three samples (Figure 3). It can be found that, in the wavenumber range 2750–3000 cm−1, both sample C and 70# asphalt binder clearly displayed two peaks (2919–2845 cm−1), while no absorption peak appeared in sample A or sample B (Table 4) [39]. Based on the existing literature concerning gasoline [40], mineral powder [41] and asphalt binder [42], the two peaks registered in the range 2750–3000 cm−1 prove the mineral powder’s adsorption capacity.

3.1.4. Adsorption Efficiency of Mineral Powder

The peak areas were calculated (OMNIC software) for sample C and asphalt binder in the wavenumber range 2750–3000 cm−1 (Figure 4), the results are shown in detail in Table 5. The intensity of the peak in 2919 cm−1 was connected to the biggest adsorption efficiency of 4.1%, while the peaks in correspondence of 2845 cm−1 and the range 2750–3000 cm−1 were 3.8%. Based on the peak areas for selected wavenumbers, the adoption ratio for mineral powder can be estimated as equal to 4%.
Considering the outcomes from FTIR and XRF analyses, no formation of new functional groups was detected, proving that the adsorption exerted by the mineral powder only involves physical processes and no chemical reactions. Previous research revealed that the surface of the mineral powder was quite rough, thus improving the adhesive effect to asphalt binder [43,44]. As shown in Figure 5, the adsorption mechanism for the mineral powder can be explained considering three phases. The addition of mineral powder in the solution promotes contact between asphalt compounds and the rough surface (a); then, part of the dissolved compounds sticks to the mineral powder’s surface (b) and forms the sediment by constant accumulation (c). Therefore, the achievement of adsorption should be attributed to the contact between the mineral powder and asphalt binder phase, promoted by the rough interface of the former. These series of reactions are physical activities, which would not affect any compositions or ingredients of the original gasoline.
The dissolved asphalt binder did not reach the maximum solubility of gasoline in this experiment [45]. Increasing the amount of dissolved asphalt in the gasoline solution also increased the probability of mineral and asphalt components creating contacts. The practical situation occurring in asphalt laboratories usually corresponds to supersaturated solutions of massive waste asphalt binder handled by limited gasoline solvent. Therefore, it can be stated that a higher content of dissolved asphalt could entail an adsorption ratio that is better than the one investigated (4%).

3.2. Cost and Environmental Impact Analyses

In order to achieve a real estimation of gasoline consumption in laboratories, the annual use of this resource in Wuhan University of Technology was taken into consideration. The total amount corresponded to 740 L, (approximately CNY 5200), 95% of which was used for asphalt cleaning related to experimental devices. Assuming that the gasoline consumption rate of a common car is 9.2 L/km, the annual laboratory usage corresponded to an 80-km drive [32].
Furthermore, the research referred to the data available in the literature concerning both the energy consumption for mineral aggregates (25.59–32.18 MJ/ton) [33] and for gasoline production (3.04–3.90 MJ/L) [34]. According to the aforementioned chemical detections and interpretive mechanisms, 15 g asphalt binder was dissolved in 150 mL gasoline, 4% of which was adsorbed by 20 g mineral powder at room temperature. Therefore, under experimental conditions, 20 g mineral powder adsorbed 4% and/or 0.6 g asphalt binder. Specifically, removing 1 kg asphalt would consume 10 L gasoline, while adsorbing 1 kg asphalt from solution would demand 33.33 kg mineral powder.

3.2.1. Economic Evaluations

The study considered the market prices for 92# gasoline (7.12 CNY/L) and mineral powder (425 CNY/t) in China according to the Numbeo database on 8 February 2020 [46]. Based on Equation (1), the study estimated the savings connected to the application of mineral powder to recycle gasoline in the laboratory. The cost of the gasoline necessary to dissolve 1 kg of bituminous binder is CNY 71.20. For the same purpose, the cost of the added mineral powder is 14.10 CNY; as a result, the difference is 57.10 CNY/L.
C = p g ∗ v g − p m ∗ m m
where C represents the saving cost(CNY), pg is the reference unit price for gasoline (CNY/L), pm is the unit price for mineral powder (CNY/kg), vg is the volume of gasoline (l) and mm is the mass of mineral powder (kg).

3.2.2. Environmental Impacts

Given the growing concerns regarding sustainability, recycling gasoline in the laboratory would not only reduce economic investments, but also entail a positive effect regarding environmental impacts. This study investigated the energy consumption and equivalent CO2 emission of employing mineral powder to adsorb asphalt binder. According to the China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2013 [31], 1 L of gasoline could release 31.75 MJ energy and 2.21 kg equivalent CO2, while its production would consume 4.54 MJ/L energy and emit 0.37 kg/L equivalent CO2 [47]. On the other hand, the extraction of 1 kg limestone from a quarry would consume 80.00 kJ energy and emit 5.95 g equivalent CO2 [48], and the following crushing and grinding operations need 220.60 kJ/kg energy and emit 59.63 g equivalent CO2 [49].
Equations (2) and (3) are applied to integrate the saved energy and reduced equivalent CO2. According to the data from referenced literatures, the removal of 1 kg of asphalt binder using mineral powder would cause 10.02 MJ energy consumption and 1.85 kg equivalent CO2 emission, while dissolving asphalt binder by gasoline directly would result in 362.90 MJ energy consumption and 25.80 kg equivalent CO2 emission.
E = ( E g +   E p ) ∗ v g − E m ∗ m m
G = ( G g +   G p ) ∗ v g − G m ∗ m m
where, E and G represent the saved energy (MJ) and reduced equivalent CO2 (kg), respectively; Eg and Ep stand for the energy consumption (MJ/L) generated by gasoline combustion and production, respectively; Gg and Gp are equivalent CO2 (kg/L) generated by gasoline combustion and production, respectively; Em and Gm mean the energy consumption (MJ/kg) and CO2 emission (kg/kg) during manufacturing mineral powder, respectively; vg represents the volume of gasoline (l) and mm is the mass of mineral powder (kg).

3.2.3. Comparative Interpretations

Combining the cost and the environmental impacts related to gasoline and mineral powder, Table 6 depict the results connected to the removal of 1 kg asphalt binder, after that, Figure 6 shows the cumulative percentage distribution for these two approaches. For the case study, treating 1 kg of bituminous binder merely with gasoline required CNY 71.20, caused 362.90 MJ of energy consumption and 25.80 kg equivalent CO2 emission. On the other hand, using mineral powder to adsorb asphalt reduced the cost by 80%, energy consumption by 97% and equivalent CO2 emission by 93%. However, the accessible asphalt binder adsorbed by mineral powder accounts for a small part in the dissolved solution. After adsorbing 1 kg asphalt binder with mineral powder, approximately 25 kg asphalt binder should be dissolved in the gasoline solvent.

4. Conclusions

Gasoline is a valued and valuable energy source in the current energy market globally, and this resource is also frequently used as a solvent to remove bituminous binder in asphalt laboratories. This study investigated the use of mineral powder to adsorb part of the asphalt binder. In order to investigate the adsorption performance, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) were employed to analyze the compositions of adsorbed sediments. Eventually, a case study compared the investigated solutions for bituminous binder removal according to costs and environmental impacts. The following conclusions can be drawn:
  • Mineral powder mixed with gasoline is an effective solution to remove bituminous binder commonly found in experimental devices in asphalt laboratories. The mechanism can be explained as a physical interaction between the mineral powder and asphalt binder.
  • Almost 4% of the binder can be adsorbed by the gasoline solution, thus proving the beneficial effect generated by the use of mineral powder.
  • The investigated case suggests that removing 1 kg asphalt binder with pure gasoline costs CNY 71.20, consumes 362.90 MJ energy and emits 25.80 kg equivalent CO2., and that adding a mineral powder can reduce these quantities by 80%, 97% and 93%, respectively.
  • Although the rough surface of the mineral powder determines the physical adsorption strength, the low adsorption rate limits the benefits in practical application. Future research should focus on the improvement of the adsorption rate.

Author Contributions

Data Curation, F.W., Q.J., Y.L. and C.Y.; Formal Analysis, H.L. and C.Y.; Investigation, F.W. and Q.J.; Methodology, F.W. and S.W.; Project Administration, S.W.; Supervision, S.W.; Writing—Review & Editing, Y.L. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71961137010 and No. 51778515), the Ministry of Science and Technology National Key R&D Plan (No. 2017YFE0111600), the State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology, No. SYSJJ2019-20) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Finally, this study was supported by the Program of China Scholarships Council (No. 201906950014 and No. 201906950028).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Strano, E.; Giometto, A.; Shai, S.; Bertuzzo, E.; Mucha, P.J.; Rinaldo, A. The scaling structure of the global road network. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 170590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Laurance, S.G.W.; Clements, G.R.; Sloan, S.; O’Connell, C.S.; Mueller, N.D.; Goosem, M.; Venter, O.; Edwards, D.P.; Phalan, B.; Balmford, A.; et al. A global strategy for road building. Nature 2014, 513, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dulac, J. Global Land Transport Infrastructure Requirements. Paris Int. Energy Agency 2013, 20, 2014. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Dulac%2C+J.%2C+Global+land+transport+infrastructure+requirements.+Paris%3A+International+Energy+Agency%2C+2013.+20%3A+p.+2014&btnG= (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  4. Steger, S.; Bleischwitz, R. Drivers for the use of materials across countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hu, W.; Shu, X.; Huang, B. Sustainability innovations in transportation infrastructure: An overview of the special volume on sustainable road paving. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Liu, R.; Cui, Z. Quantitative Analysis of Risk in Safety Engineering Laboratory. Res. Explor. Lab. 2019, 2, 64. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Quantitative+analysis+of+risk+in+safety+engineering+laboratory.+&btnG= (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  7. Gao, L.; Jiang, B.; Lin, M.-Q. Research on Management and Construction Strategy of Engineering Laboratory in the Context of New Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Development (ICMESD 2019), Suzhou, China, 21–22 June 2019; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Van der Hoeven, M. World Energy Outlook 2012; International Energy Agency: Tokyo, Japan, 2013; Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Van+der+Hoeven%2C+M.%2C+World+energy+outlook+2012.+International+Energy+Agency%3A+Tokyo&btnG= (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  9. Shafiee, S.; Topal, E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 2009, 37, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Leeper, S.A.; Wankat, P.C. Gasohol production by extraction of ethanol from water using gasoline as solvent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1982, 21, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Ren, S.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H. Building Decorative Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 342–358. [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith, W.L. Selective solubility: “Like dissolves like”. J. Chem. Educ. 1977, 54, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McBee, W.C.; Sullivan, T.A. Improved Resistance of Sulfur-Asphalt Paving Formulations to Attack by Fuels. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1977, 16, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Winkler, L.A. Asphalt Paint. U.S. Patent 2,542,608, 20 February 1951. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stauffer, E.; Byron, D. Alternative Fuels in Fire Debris Analysis: Biodiesel Basics. J. Forensic Sci. 2007, 52, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Contributors of Wikipedia. Gasoline. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gasoline&oldid=934730337 (accessed on 8 January 2020).
  17. Vulimiri, S.V.; Pratt, M.M.; Kulkarni, S.; Beedanagari, S.; Mahadevan, B. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Solvents and Gases. In Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 379–396. [Google Scholar]
  18. Smallwood, I.M. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayden, J.W.; Comstock, E.G.; Comstock, B.S. The Clinical Toxicology of Solvent Abuse. Clin. Toxicol. 1976, 9, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Abadin, H.; Liccione, J.J. Disulfide Toxicological Profile for Carbon. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Abadin%2C+H.+and+J.J.+Liccione%2C+Toxicological+profile+for+carbon+disulfide.+1996&btnG= (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  21. Zabrodskii, P.F.; Germanchuk, V.G.; Kirichuk, V.F.; Karpenko, N.I. Effect of tetrachloromethane on the immune system. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2004, 137, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gattey, D. PART 8—Chemical-Induced Ocular Side Effects. In Clinical Ocular Toxicology; Fraunfelder, F.T., Fraunfelder, F.W., Chambers, W.A., Eds.; Saunders: Edinburgh, UK, 2008; pp. 289–306. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/books/drug-induced-ocular-side-effects/fraunfelder/978-0-323-31984-3 (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  23. Chen, M.-Z.; Lin, J.-T.; Wu, S.-P.; Liu, C.-H. Utilization of recycled brick powder as alternative filler in asphalt mixture. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 1532–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Remisova, E. Study of mineral filler effect on asphalt mixtures properties. Bitum. Mix. Pavements VI 2015, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dan, L.; Chuanfeng, Z.; Yong, Q.; Heng, B.; Keyao, L.; Junfei, H. Analysing the effects of the mesoscopic characteristics of mineral powder fillers on the cohesive strength of asphalt mortars at low temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xing, B.; Fan, W.; Zhuang, C.; Qian, C.; Lv, X. Effects of the morphological characteristics of mineral powder fillers on the rheological properties of asphalt mastics at high and medium temperatures. Powder Technol. 2019, 348, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sjöström, J.; Bindler, R.; Granberg, T.; Kylander, M.E. Procedure for Organic Matter Removal from Peat Samples for XRD Mineral Analysis. Wetlands 2018, 39, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. De Carvalho, H.W.P.; De Almeida, E.; Tomazello-Filho, M.; De Carvalho, H.W.P. Space-resolved determination of the mineral nutrient content in tree-rings by X-ray fluorescence. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Wu, S. Aging Mechanism and Rejuvenating Possibility of SBS Copolymers in Asphalt Binders. Polymers 2020, 12, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chauhan, S.P.S. Mineral Analysis of Pantja Goat Milk through Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. IJCS 2019, 7, 3510–3512. Available online: http://www.chemijournal.com/archives/?year=2019&vol=7&issue=3&ArticleId=6056&si=false (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  31. Press, C.S. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2013; National Bureau of Statistics of China: Beijing, China, 2013. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2013/indexeh.htm (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  32. Kayser, H.A. Gasoline demand and car choice: Estimating gasoline demand using household information. Energy Econ. 2000, 22, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jullien, A.; Proust, C.; Martaud, T.; Rayssac, E.; Ropert, C. Variability in the environmental impacts of aggregate production. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Furuholt, E. Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1995, 14, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lothenbach, B.; Le Saoût, G.; Gallucci, E.; Scrivener, K. Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 848–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wielinski, J.; Kriech, A.; Huber, G.; Horton, A.; Osborn, L. Analysis of vacuum tower asphalt extender and effect on bitumen and asphalt properties. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2015, 16, 90–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wheeler, B.D. Analysis of limestones and dolomites by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. In Masonry: Materials, Testing, and Applications; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Loon, J.A. Analytical Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Selected Methods; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/books/analytical-atomic-absorption-spectroscopy/van-loon/978-0-12-714050-6 (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  39. Xiang, K.; Wang, X.; Huang, G.; Zheng, J.; Huang, J.; Li, G. Thermal ageing behavior of styrene–butadiene random copolymer: A study on the ageing mechanism and relaxation properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1704–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Al-Degs, Y.S.; Amer, M. Determination of motor gasoline adulteration using FTIR spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. Talanta 2008, 76, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Madejová, J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vib. Spectrosc. 2003, 31, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xue, Y.; Wu, S.; Cai, J.; Zhou, M.; Zha, J. Effects of two biomass ashes on asphalt binder: Dynamic shear rheological characteristic analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 56, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, Y.; Matsui, I.; Feng, N. Effect of compound mineral powders on workability and rheological property of HPC. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cox, A.J.; Hukins, D.W. Morphology of Mineral Deposits on Encrusted Urinary Catheters Investigated by Scanning Electron Microscopy. J. Urol. 1989, 142, 1347–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miadonye, A.; Evans, L. The Solubility of Asphaltenes in Different Hydrocarbon Liquids. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2010, 28, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. NUMBEO. Gasoline, Petrol Prices, in Gas Prices; NUMBEO: Belgrade, Serbia, 2020; Available online: https://www.numbeo.com/gas-prices/country_result.jsp?country=Norway (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  47. Hao, H.; Liu, F.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, F. Compression ignition of low-octane gasoline: Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Appl. Energy 2016, 181, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, H.; Lepech, M.D.; Keoleian, G.A.; Qian, S.; Li, V.C. Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Construction, and Roadway Deterioration. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2010, 16, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Norgate, T.; Haque, N. Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 10 05761 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sample preparation.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sample preparation.
Applsci 10 05761 g001
Applsci 10 05761 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD spectra for three investigated samples.
Figure 2. XRD spectra for three investigated samples.
Applsci 10 05761 g002
Applsci 10 05761 g003 550
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for pure asphalt binder and the three samples.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for pure asphalt binder and the three samples.
Applsci 10 05761 g003
Applsci 10 05761 g004 550
Figure 4. Selected sections for calculating peak areas.
Figure 4. Selected sections for calculating peak areas.
Applsci 10 05761 g004
Applsci 10 05761 g005 550
Figure 5. Adsorption mechanism for mineral powder: (a) adsorption; (b) adhesion; (c) sediment.
Figure 5. Adsorption mechanism for mineral powder: (a) adsorption; (b) adhesion; (c) sediment.
Applsci 10 05761 g005
Applsci 10 05761 g006 550
Figure 6. Cumulative percentage distribution for the investigated approaches according to cost and environmental impacts.
Figure 6. Cumulative percentage distribution for the investigated approaches according to cost and environmental impacts.
Applsci 10 05761 g006
Table
Table 1. Fundamental properties of Pen60/80 asphalt binder.
Table 1. Fundamental properties of Pen60/80 asphalt binder.
PropertyResultStandard
Specific gravity1.034ASTM D70
Penetration at 25 °C (0.1 mm)63ASTM D5
Ductility, 5 cm/min, 5 °C (mm)37ASTM D113
Softening point (°C)48ASTM D36
Apparent viscosity, 135 °C (Pa·s)0.46ASTM D4402
Loss on heating (wt.%)+0.09ASTM D6
Table
Table 2. Physical properties of mineral powder.
Table 2. Physical properties of mineral powder.
PropertyResultStandard
Apparent density (t/m3)>2.701T 0352-2000
Moisture content (%)<0.1T 0103-1993
Hydrophilic coefficient0.8T 0353-2000
Plasticity index (%)3.4T 0354-2000
Passing rate (0.075 mm sieve, %)86.7T 0351-2000
Table
Table 3. Composition and content for the three investigated samples.
Table 3. Composition and content for the three investigated samples.
CompositionContent (%)
Sample ASample BSample C
Na2O0.3250.3570.392
MgO7.8358.4888.413
Al2O315.74916.75516.218
SiO232.61233.65132.987
SO32.3732.3152.674
K2O0.4450.4230.442
CaO39.23736.78837.600
TiO20.7580.6150.638
MnO0.1330.1410.155
Fe2O30.2410.2180.194
SrO0.1020.0850.094
Y2O30.0120.0100.012
ZrO20.0490.0410.044
BaO0.1030.1140.133
ZnO000.005
Table
Table 4. Peaks and assignments for the FTIR wavenumber range 2750–3000 cm−1.
Table 4. Peaks and assignments for the FTIR wavenumber range 2750–3000 cm−1.
Wavenumber
(cm−1)		AssignmentOrigin of the Chemical Structure
2919Methylene C–H anti-symmetry stretchingMethylene units
2845Methyl C–H symmetry stretchingMethylene units
Table
Table 5. Peak areas for selected wavenumbers.
Table 5. Peak areas for selected wavenumbers.
Peak Wavenumber (cm−1) and Areas
Section 1 (2919 cm−1)Section 2 (2845 cm−1)2750–3000 cm−1
70# asphalt17.3857.84562.362
Sample C0.7100.2952.369
Percentage (%)4.0843.7603.799
Table
Table 6. Cost and environmental impacts of cleaning 1 kg asphalt with 2 approaches.
Table 6. Cost and environmental impacts of cleaning 1 kg asphalt with 2 approaches.
Cost (CNY)Energy Consumption (MJ)Equivalent CO2 EMISSION (kg)
Gasoline71.20362.9025.80
Mineral powder14.1010.021.85
Reducing percentage80%97%93%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; Li, H.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, S. Mechanism and Investment Analysis of Recycling Gasoline Solvent with Mineral Powder for Asphalt Cleaning. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175761

AMA Style

Wang F, Li H, Jiang Q, Yang C, Li Y, Wu S. Mechanism and Investment Analysis of Recycling Gasoline Solvent with Mineral Powder for Asphalt Cleaning. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(17):5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Fusong, Hechuan Li, Qi Jiang, Chao Yang, Yuanyuan Li, and Shaopeng Wu. 2020. "Mechanism and Investment Analysis of Recycling Gasoline Solvent with Mineral Powder for Asphalt Cleaning" Applied Sciences 10, no. 17: 5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop