Novel Electronic Device to Quantify the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Reciprocating Files after Using and Sterilization
by
, , , and
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho
1
,
Óscar Alonso-Ezpeleta
2,
Alberto Albaladejo Martínez
3,
Vicente Faus Matoses
4,
Javier Caviedes Brucheli
5,
Rubén Agustín-Panadero
4,*,
Jesús Mena Álvarez
1 and
Fernando Vizmanos Martínez-Berganza
1 1
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Endodontics, School of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22006 Zaragosa, Spain
3
Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
4
Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
5
Centro de Investigaciones Odontológicas (C.I.O.) Pontificia, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 1101, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(14), 4962; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144962
Submission received: 26 June 2020
/
Revised: 11 July 2020
/
Accepted: 16 July 2020
/
Published: 19 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences)
Abstract
:Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of the time of use (TU) and sterilization cycles (SC) of endodontic reciprocating files on cyclic fatigue resistance. Methods: One-hundred-and-twenty (120) Procodile NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments were selected at random and distributed into the following study groups: A: 0 sterilization cycles/0s time of use (n = 10); B: 0/60 (n = 10); C: 0/120 (n = 10); D: 1/0 (n = 10); E: 1/60 (n = 10); F: 1/120 (n = 10); G: 5/0 (n = 10); H: 5/60 (n = 10); I: 5/120 (n = 10); J: 10/0 (n = 10); K: 10/60 (n = 10); and L: 10/120 (n = 10). A dynamic cyclic fatigue device was designed using computer-aided design/computer-aided engineering (CAD/CAE) technology and created with a 3D printer to simulate the pecking motion performed by the clinician. Failure of the endodontic rotary instrument was detected by a light-emitting diode-light-dependent resistor (LED-LDR) system controlled by an Arduino driver complex and management software. The results were analyzed using the ANOVA test. Results: All pairwise comparisons presented statistically significant differences between the time to failure, number of cycles to failure and number of cycles of in-and-out movement for the time of use study groups (p < 0.001), but not in the number of sterilization cycles (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files negatively affects dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance. Dynamic cyclic resistance is not affected by the number of sterilization cycles.
1. Introduction
Nickel–titanium (NiTi) endodontic rotary instruments and the subsequent development of mechanical preparation has improved the prognosis of root canal treatment, as their increased taper and automated motion enable more effective cleaning and shaping of the root canal system [1]. Many advances have been made in the last few years, including innovations in instrument design, new NiTi alloys, thermal treating of NiTi alloys, and the addition of new movements to instrumentation systems. The changes produced in the martensitic phase of the NiTi alloy, led with little or no memory, and the decrease in the tendency of the file to straighten during use, results in a more flexible file [2] with greater resistance to both cyclic fatigue as a torsional fracture [3].
However, the possible separation of instruments remains a major concern during clinical use of NiTi files. Failure due to cyclic fatigue or torsional fracture occurs unexpectedly, without any sign of previous permanent plastic deformation. It is caused by alternating tension-compression cycles, which are generated in the instrument when it is turned in a curved channel. Many variables that can influence resistance to fracture due to cyclic fatigue and torsional stress of NiTi rotary files have been investigated, including operating speed, instrument design, metal surface treatments, effect of irrigation solutions, and the sterilization cycles to which rotary files are subjected [4].
NiTi rotary files are often reused in clinical practice for cost-saving reasons. The sterilization procedure follows the steps of disinfection, cleaning, washing, drying, packaging, and heat sterilization [5]. The disinfection and cleaning steps reduce the bacterial load and remove debris from the blades of the instrument, and the sterilization step kills any form of microorganism, including spores [6]. The most widely used method for sterilization in the dental field described in the scientific literature is heat sterilization [7].
Repeated autoclave sterilization is necessary to prevent cross-contamination between patients [8]. The heat used during sterilization procedures may affect the mechanical and physical properties of these files [9]. Previous research has found that autoclave sterilization resulted in an increase in the surface roughness of NiTi rotary files, which affects the mechanical properties [10,11]. These changes can affect the external surfaces in the form of micropitting and/or corrosion [12], reduction in cutting capacity, and/or by impairing resistance to cyclic fatigue or torsional fatigue [4]. Other studies hypothesize that after repeated clinical uses and sterilizations, there is a change in the austenite finishing temperature closest to the clinical operating temperatures. This would alter the proportions of austenite and microstructural phases of NiTi of martensite, ultimately affecting the mechanical properties of the files [2,3,13].
On the other hand, other studies suggest that autoclaving could improve the mechanical properties of instruments manufactured using a type of heat treatment, although this does not necessarily apply to other heat treatment methods. NiTi as an alloy is very “sensitive” to both thermal and mechanical (machining) tension that may occur during the raw material manufacturing processes and subsequent use of endodontic instruments. Adequate control of transition temperatures is essential to ensure optimum super-elastic properties. In addition, any other machining process will affect transition temperatures. This may explain why the performance of NiTi rotary instruments is affected by manufacturing quality processes and different thermal treatments [4,14].
Therefore, the most recent scientific literature does not always agree on the effects of sterilization. These differences may be due to the heterogeneity of the instruments researched. The endodontic instruments manufactured by various brands differ not only in diameter and the cone at the tip, but also in shape of the sections and the characteristics of alloys [15,16]. The scientific literature provides conflicting findings regarding the effects of heat sterilization on the properties of NiTi and steel instruments used in endodontics.
However, there have been no published studies analyzing the influence of clinical use and autoclaving cycles on the cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi reciprocating files.
The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the effect of time of use and number of sterilization cycles on the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files, with a null hypothesis (H0) stating that the time of use and number of sterilization cycles would not affect the resistance of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files to dynamic cyclic fatigue.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
One-hundred-and-twenty (120) sterile 250 µm apical diameter and 6% taper (25.06) austenite NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo, Germany) with a variable tapered core, one-file system, 25 mm in length, counter-clockwise (CCW) reciprocating motion, and double-S cross-section were utilized in this in vitro study. All NiTi endodontic reciprocating files were first inspected under magnification (SZR-10, Optika, Bergamo, Italy), and all samples were included. A randomized controlled experimental trial was performed at the Department of Endodontics of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Alfonso X El Sabio University (Madrid, Spain), between September and November 2019. The NiTi endodontic reciprocating files were randomized (Epidat 4.1, Galicia, Spain) and categorized into the following study groups: A: 0 sterilization cycles and 0 seconds of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); B: 0 sterilization cycles and 60 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); C: 0 sterilization cycles and 120 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); D: 1 sterilization cycles and 0 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); E: 1 sterilization cycles and 60 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); F: 1 sterilization cycles and 120 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); G: 5 sterilization cycles and 0 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); H: 5 sterilization cycles and 60 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); I: 5 sterilization cycles and 120 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); J: 10 sterilization cycles and 0 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); K: 10 sterilization cycles and 60 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10); and L: 10 sterilization cycles and 120 s of dynamic cyclic fatigue (n = 10).
2.2. Experimental Cycling Fatigue Procedure
Dynamic fatigue procedures were performed regarding the previously described cyclic fatigue device (utility model patent number ES1219520) [17]. The structure of the dynamic cyclic fatigue test device was planned by computer aided design/computer aided engineering (CAD/CAE) 2D/3D software (Midas FX+®, Brunleys, Milton Keynes, UK) and created using 3D printing (ProJet® 6000 3D Systems©, Rock Hill, SC, USA) (Figure 1A–F).
The Procodile 25.06 NiTi endodontic reciprocating file (Komet Medical, Lemgo) was assessed using a microcomputed tomography scan (Skyscan 1176, Bruker-MicroCT, Kontich, Belgium) to design an accurate standard tessellation language (STL) digital file. The STL file was used to generate a replica of an artificial root canal of 60° angle and 3 mm radius of curvature using the CAD/CAE 2D/3D software for inverse engineering technology (Figure 2A) [18]. The artificial root canal was created by means of a highly accurate subtractive technique from a stainless steel piece (Cocchiola S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina). This process ensured intimate contact between the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) and the artificial root canal walls (Figure 1H). The artificial root canal was positioned on its own support (Figure 2B) and failure of the endodontic reciprocating files was detected by analyzing the amount of light using emitted from a Light-Emitting Diode (LED) (20000 mcd) (Ref.: 12.675/5/b/c/20k, Batuled, Coslada, Spain) (Figure 1G) by a Light-Dependent Resistor (LDR) sensor (Ref.: C000025, Arduino LLC®, Ivrea, Italy) located opposite at 3 mm of the working length, with a frequency of 50 ms to accurately detect the time of failure. The axial pecking movement of the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files affects the measurement of the light signal received by the LDR sensor, which were shown in real time on a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) (Ref.: LCD-09568, Spark Fun Electronics, Niwot, CO, USA). Therefore, the absence of variation in light values during three cycles of light analysis was interpreted as the NiTi endodontic reciprocating file’s failure. The sensor data was conditioned by a processor (Arduino UNO Rev. 3, Arduino LLC®, Ivrea, Italy), and the hardware was managed by software that receives input signals from the Arduino board.
The lineal displacement of the artificial root canal support on the lineal guide (Ref.: HGH35C 10249-1 001 MA, HIWIN Technologies Corp. Taichung, Taiwan) was generated by the gear motor (Ref.: 1589, Pololu® Corporation, Las Vegas, NV, USA) and controlled by the driver (Ref.: DRV8835, Pololu® Corporation, Las Vegas, NV, USA) through a roller bearing system (Ref.: MR104ZZ, FAG, Schaeffler Herzogenaurach, Germany). The NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were used with a 6:1 reduction handpiece (EndoPilot, Komet Medical, Lemgo) and reciprocating motion, according to the manufacturer’s instructions [19]. The endodontic handpiece (EndoPilot, Komet Medical, Lemgo) was digitalized (3D Geomagic Capture Wrap, 3D Systems©, Rock Hill, SC, USA) to enable accurate adjustment to the endodontic handpiece supports during the dynamic cyclic fatigue tests. Initially, the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were randomly (Epidat 4.1, Galicia, Spain) unsterilized or pre-sterilized 1, 5 or 10 times using the following parameters: 3 bar, 134 °C and 45 min. Next, the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were randomly (Epidat 4.1, Galicia, Spain) subjected to no fatigue, fatigued for 60 s or fatigued for 120 s in the dynamic cycle fatigue device. The NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were used until fracture occurred in order to analyze the effect of sterilization cycles and the time of use on the resistance of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files to cyclic fatigue.
All NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were used in the dynamic cyclic fatigue device at a frequency of 60 pecking movements/min according to a previous study [17]. To reduce the friction between the reciprocating files and the artificial canal walls, a special high-flow synthetic oil designed for the lubrication of mechanical parts (Singer All-Purpose Oil; Singer Corp., Barcelona, Spain) was applied.
All NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Procodile®, Komet Medical, Lemgo) were used until fracture occurred. The time to failure, the number of cycles to failure, the number of cycles of in and out movements, and the length of the fractured file tip were measured and recorded.
2.3. Statistical Tests
Statistical analysis was performed by means of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive analysis is described as mean and standard deviation (SD) for quantitative data. Comparative statistics was carried out by comparing the time to failure (in seconds), the number of cycles to failure, the number of pecking movements (cycles of in-and-out movements), and the length of the fractured file tip (mm) using the ANOVA test. Furthermore, Weibull statistical analysis was also calculated. Statistical significance level was established at p < 0.05.
3. Results
The mean and SD values for time to failure (in seconds) and the mean length of the fractured file tip (mm) for each of the study groups are displayed in Table 1 and Figure 3.
The ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant differences between time to failure and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p < 0.001) (Figure 3). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between time to failure and the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p = 0.848) (Figure 3). The mean length of the fractured file tip did not show statistically significant differences between time to failure of the time of use (p > 0.05) and the sterilization cycles (p > 0.05) of the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Figure 3).
The scale distribution parameter (η) of Weibull statistics found statistically significant differences between time to failure and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.001) (Table 2, Figure 4A); however, there were no statistically significant differences in time to failure between the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 4B). The shape distribution parameter (β) of Weibull statistics found no statistically significant differences between time to failure in relation to time of use (p > 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 4A), and the sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 4B).
The mean and SD values for number of cycles to failure and the length of the fractured file tip (mm) of the study groups are displayed in Table 3 and Figure 5.
The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences between the number of cycles to failure and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p < 0.001) (Figure 5). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the number of cycles to failure and the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p = 0.848) (Figure 5). The mean length of the fractured file tip did not show statistically significant differences between the number of cycles to failure and the time of use (p > 0.05) and number of sterilization cycles (p > 0.05) applied to the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Figure 5).
The scale distribution parameter (η) of Weibull statistics showed statistically significant differences between the number of cycles to failure and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p < 0.001) (Table 4, Figure 6A); however, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of cycles to failure and the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 4, Figure 6B). The shape distribution parameter (β) of Weibull statistics did not show statistically significant differences between the number of cycles to failure and the time of use (p > 0.05) (Table 4, Figure 6A), nor the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 4, Figure 6B).
The mean and SD values for the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the length of the fractured file tip (mm) of the study groups are displayed in Table 5 and Figure 7.
The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences between the number of cycles of in and out movement and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p < 0.001) (Figure 7). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the number of cycles of in and out movement and the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p = 0.848) (Figure 7). The mean length of the fractured file tip did not show statistically significant differences between the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the time of use (p > 0.05) or the number of sterilization cycles (p > 0.05) applied to the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (Figure 7).
The scale distribution parameter (η) of Weibull statistics showed statistically significant differences between the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the time of use of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p < 0.001) (Table 6, Figure 8A); however, no statistically significant differences were found between the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the number of sterilization cycles applied to the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 6, Figure 8B). The shape distribution parameter (β) of Weibull statistics did not show statistically significant differences between the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the time of use (p > 0.05) (Table 6, Figure 8A) or the number of sterilization cycles applied to the NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (p > 0.05) (Table 6, Figure 8B).
4. Discussion
The results obtained in the present study reject the null hypothesis (H0) that states that time of use would have no effect on the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi endodontic reciprocating files. However, it also accepts the null hypothesis (H0) that states that the number of sterilization cycles applied to NiTi endodontic reciprocating files would have no effect on their resistance to dynamic cyclic fatigue.
The cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi endodontic rotary and reciprocating instruments has been widely compared with regard to the NiTi alloy used, cross-section design, curvature angle, radius, pecking motion frequency, etc., with both static and dynamic custom-made cyclic fatigue devices having been used [20,21]. However, dynamic custom-made cyclic fatigue devices are the only ones that faithfully simulate the pecking movement performed by the clinician, more accurately representing the amount of time during which the NiTi endodontic rotary instrument remains in the artificial root canal. In addition, the artificial root canal should be custom-designed for the specific NiTi endodontic rotary instrument being tested in order to ensure immediate contact with the artificial root canal (as happens in a clinical setting). This also ensures that compression and tensile stress cycles are localized at the maximum flexure point [22], distributes the shear resistance homogeneously along the NiTi endodontic rotary instrument surface, and leads to the formation of microcracks on the instruments’ microstructure [23] without any signs of plastic deformation in the static model; the area of these stresses spreads through the instrument shaft in the dynamic model [21]. Most of the static and dynamic custom-made cyclic fatigue devices provided a non-instrument-based artificial root canal [24,25], so the results extracted from these studies should be carefully considered and not applied to clinical practice. Di Nardo et al. reported statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the time to failure of Wave One Gold NiTi endodontic reciprocating files (50.75 ± 20.06 s) and Reziflow (30.13 ± 9.40) conventional NiTi endodontic rotary instruments [26]. Although this was a static cyclic fatigue test with an artificial root canal of parallel walls and 90° and 5 mm curvature radius, Reziflow has a similar design and manufacturing process as Procodile. In this study, a curvature angle of 60° was designed, because Topçuoğlu et al. reported that artificial root canals with a 45° angle of curvature did not show statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the time to failure of WaveOne Gold (412.4 ± 55.2 s) and R-Pilot (394.5 ± 45.3 s) glider files; however, artificial root canals with a curvature angle of 60° showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the time to failure of WaveOne Gold (368.3 ± 44.1 s) and R-Pilot (247.2 ± 36.2 s) endodontic instruments [27].
Kim et al. state that the endodontic reciprocating instruments must be disposed of after the first use because the mechanical properties, metallurgical features and risk of failure of the endodontic reciprocating instruments result from repeated usage [28]. Furthermore, Generali et al. reported that the continued usage of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instruments reduced resistance to cyclic fatigue, also reducing the martensite and R-phase in Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instruments and causing microcracks near the tip of both endodontic reciprocating instruments after usage. In addition, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the cyclic fatigue resistance of new and used Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instruments, in keeping with the findings of the present study. However, no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the cyclic fatigue resistance of new and used Reciproc endodontic reciprocating instruments. Regardless of the NiTi alloy of the endodontic reciprocating system, the double-S cross-section design of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instruments and the reciprocating movement are similar to the Procodile NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments; even the DSC curves confirm that the Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instruments are made up of a mix of austenite and R-phase, as observed in XRD patterns [29]. However, this was a static cyclic fatigue test with an artificial root canal machined on a quenched martensitic carbon steel plate. The endodontic instruments are designed to cut dentin, but not materials with different cutting resistance values, so the results of the present study can hardly be accurately extrapolated to a clinical setting. However, in the present study, the NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments were selected in the austenite phase due to their physical and metallurgical properties in terms of hardness and cutting capability in order to ensure the advance of the NiTi endodontic reciprocating instrument inside the stainless steel artificial root canal. In addition, the automatic, objective detection of the NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments failure process using a LED-LDR system provided an accurate and standardizable measurement procedure, regardless of the subjective measurement protocol used in most studies to detect the precise moment of failure of the endodontic instrument tip. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean lengths of fractured file tips, whose maximum area of stress corresponded to the mid-point arc of the apical curvature, in keeping with the findings of Pruett et al. [22]. This result confirms the correct and repeated positioning of the tested NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments within the artificial root canal.
Some researchers have postulated that the gamma-ray and autoclave sterilization processes used for fully sterile packaged Hyflex EDM and TRUShape endodontic rotary instruments might impact on the life span of NiTi martensitic endodontic rotary instruments in terms of their resistance to fatigue [30]. Furthermore, the heat sterilization method can also cause changes in the physical and mechanical properties of NiTi endodontic rotary instruments and even impact the torsional properties of NiTi endodontic rotary instruments [31]. Yang et al. reported that the surface roughness of K3XF R-phase NiTi endodontic rotary instruments increased after autoclaving, but this did not affect the cyclic fatigue resistance after 30 sterilization cycles [32]. Pedullà et al. found that repeated sterilization cycles did not impact resistance of NiTi endodontic rotary instruments to fatigue except for Twisted Files R-phase NiTi endodontic rotary instruments, which showed a significant decrease in flexural resistance after three sterilization cycles (p < 0.05) [33]. Champa et al. showed that multiple sterilization cycles significantly increased the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc M-Wire NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments, but decreased the cyclic fatigue resistance of Wave One M Wire NiTi endodontic reciprocating instruments in an artificial root canal (not anatomically modeled) with 60° of curvature in a static cyclic fatigue device [34]. Özyürek et al. also reported that the sterilization cycles significantly increased the cyclic fatigue resistance of Protaper Next M-Wire NiTi endodontic rotary instruments (p < 0.05) and Protaper Gold alloy NiTi endodontic rotary instruments (p < 0.05) [35]. Zhao et al. showed that the cyclic fatigue resistance of pre-sterilized HyFlex CM CM Wire NiTi endodontic rotary instruments and K3XF R-phase NiTi endodontic rotary instruments increased significantly (p < 0.05) after 10 sterilization cycles in an artificial root canal (not anatomically modeled) with a curvature of 60° and a radius of 3 mm in a static cyclic fatigue device [36]. Most of the martensitic endodontic rotary instruments (M-Wire alloys) have demonstrated an increase in cyclic fatigue resistance after heat sterilization procedures. However, in the present study, the cyclic fatigue resistance of austenite NiTi endodontic reciprocating files was not affected after 10 autoclave sterilization cycles (p > 0.05). The thermal treating of M-Wire endodontic rotary instruments makes the martensitic phase of NiTi alloy less subject to breakage during clinical use and stabilizes the NiTi alloy. The thermal heating induced by heat sterilization procedures make it even more stable, increasing cyclic fatigue resistance [31].
5. Conclusions
The conclusion derived from the present study is that the time of use of austenite NiTi endodontic reciprocating files negatively affects their dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance; however, resistance to dynamic cyclic fatigue is not affected by the number of sterilization cycles.
Author Contributions
All of the authors contributed to the investigation, supervision, writing, review, and editing of the study. The study was conceptualized by J.M.Á., A.A.M., Á.Z.-M., and R.A.-P. Data curation, data visualization, and analysis were carried out by V.F.M., J.C.B., F.V.M.-B. and Ó.A.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Gavini, G.; Santos, M.D.; Caldeira, C.L.; Machado, M.; Freire, L.G.; Iglecias, E.F.; Peters, O.A.; Candeiro, G. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: A concise review of the state of the art. Braz. Oral. Res. 2018, 32, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, Y.; Zhou, H.M.; Zheng, Y.F.; Campbell, L.; Peng, B.; Haapasalo, M. Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1566–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Testarelli, L.; Plotino, G.; Al-Sudani, D.; Vincenzi, V.; Giansiracusa, A.; Grande, N.M.; Gambarini, G. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1293–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Plotino, G.; Costanzo, A.; Grande, N.M.; Petrovic, R.; Testarelli, L.; Gambarini, G. Experimental evaluation on the influence of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue of new nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laneve, E.; Raddato, B.; Dioguardi, M.; Di Gioia, G.; Troiano, G.; Lo Muzio, L. Sterilisation in Dentistry: A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Dent. 2019, 2019, 650728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sheth, N.C.; Rathod, Y.V.; Shenoi, P.R.; Shori, D.D.; Khode, R.T.; Khadse, A.P. Evaluation of new technique of sterilization using biological indicator. J. Conserv. Dent. 2017, 20, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raju, T.B.V.G.; Garapati, S.; Agrawal, R.; Reddy, S.; Razdan, A.; Kumar, S.K. Sterilizing Endodontic Files by four different sterilization methods to prevent cross-infection. An In-vitro Study. J. Int. Oral. Health 2013, 5, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
- Spagnuolo, G.; Ametrano, G.; D’antò, V.; Rengo, C.; Simeone, M.; Riccitiello, F.; Amato, M. Effect of autoclaving on the surfaces of TiN-coated and conventional nickel–titanium rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casper, R.B.; Roberts, H.W.; Roberts, M.D.; Himel, V.T.; Bergeron, B.E. Comparison of autoclaving effects on torsional deformation and fracture resistance of three innovative endodontic file systems. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1572–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valois, C.R.; Silva, L.P.; Azevedo, R.B. Multiple autoclave cycles affect the surface of rotary nickel-titanium files: An atomic force microscopy study. J. Endod. 2008, 34, 859–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alapati, S.B.; Brantley, W.A.; Svec, T.A.; Powers, J.M.; Nusstein, J.M.; Daehn, G.S. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassi, F.R.; Pappalettere, C.; Di Comite, M.; Corsalini, M.; Mori, G.; Ballini, A.; Crincoli, V.; Pettini, F.; Rapone, B.; Boccaccio, A. Effect of different irrigating solutions and endodontic sealers on bond strength of the dentin-post interface with and without defects. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 9, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Seago, S.T.; Bergeron, B.E.; Kirkpatrick, T.C.; Roberts, M.D.; Roberts, H.W.; Himel, V.T.; Sabey, K.A. Effect of Repeated Simulated Clinical Use and Sterilization on the Cutting Efficiency and Flexibility of Hyflex CM Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hilfer, P.B.; Bergeron, B.E.; Mayerchak, M.J.; Roberts, H.W.; Jeansonne, B.G. Multiple autoclave cycle effects on cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary files produced by new manufacturing methods. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alfoqom Alazemi, M.; Bryant, S.T.; Dummer, P.M. Deformation of HyFlex CM instruments and their shape recovery following heat sterilization. Int. Endod. J. 2015, 48, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, F.; Adeodato, C.; Barbosa, I.; Aboud, L.; Scelza, P.; Zaccaro Scelza, M. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: A systematic review. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zubizarreta-Macho, A.; Mena Álvarez, J.; Albadalejo Martínez, A.; Segura-Egea, J.J.; Caviedes Brucheli, J.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; López Píriz, R.; Alonso-Ezpeleta, O. Influence of the pecking motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic rotary files. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schneider, S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 1971, 32, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio, J.; Zarzosa, J.I.; Pallarés, A. A Comparative Study of Cyclic Fatigue of 10 Different Types of Endodontic Instruments: An in Vitro Study. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2019, 53, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De-Deus, G.; Vieira VT, L.; da Silva EJ, N.; Lopes, H.; Elias, C.N.; Moreira, E.J. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keleş, A.; Eymirli, A.; Uyanık, O.; Nagas, E. Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pruett, J.P.; Clement, D.J.; Carnes, D.L., Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J. Endod. 1997, 23, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hulsmann, M.; Donnermeyer, D.; Schäfer, E. A critical appraisal of studies on cyclic fatigue resistance of engine-driven endodontic instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1427–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Olcay, K.; Eyuboglu, T.F.; Erkan, E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of wave one gold, protaper next and 2shape nickel titanium rotary instruments using a reliable method for measuring temperature. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2019, 22, 1335–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, R.; Arias, A.; Macorra, J.C.; Govindjee, S.; Peters, O.A. Resistance to cyclic fatigue of reciprocating instruments determined at body temperature and phase transformation analysis. Aust. Endod. J. 2019, 45, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Nardo, D.; Galli, M.; Morese, A.; Seracchiani, M.; Ferri, V.; Miccoli, G.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L. A comparative study of mechanical resistance of two reciprocating files. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topçuoğlu, H.S.; Topçuoğlu, G.; Kafdağ, Ö.; Arslan, H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating glide path files in 45- and 60-degree curved canals. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.W.; Ha, J.H.; Cheung, G.S.P.; Versluis, A.; Kwak, S.W.; Kim, H.C. Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1671–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Generali, L.; Puddu, P.; Borghi, A.; Brancolini, S.; Lusvarghi, L.; Bolelli, G.; Consolo, U.; Pedullà, E. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc. Int. Endod. J. 2020, 53, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias, A.; Macorra, J.C.; Govindjee, S.; Peters, O.A. Effect of gamma-ray sterilization on phase transformation behavior and fatigue resistance of contemporary nickel-titanium instruments. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dioguardi, M.; Sovereto, D.; Aiuto, R.; Laino, L.; Illuzzi, G.; Laneve, E.; Raddato, B.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Dioguardi, A.; Zhurakivska, K.; et al. Effects of Hot Sterilization on Torsional Properties of Endodontic Instruments: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel) 2019, 12, 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.J.; Hou, B.X.; Hou, X.M. Effect of autoclave on surface microstructure and cyclic fatigue resistance of R-phase rotary instruments. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2018, 50, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pedullà, E.; Benites, A.; La Rosa, G.M.; Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Rapisarda, E.; Generali, L. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Champa, C.; Divya, V.; Srirekha, A.; Karale, R.; Shetty, A.; Sadashiva, P. An analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating instruments in different canal curvatures after immersion in sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving: An in vitro study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2017, 20, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Özyürek, T.; Yılmaz, K.; Uslu, G. The effects of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2017, 42, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhao, D.; Shen, Y.; Peng, B.; Haapasalo, M. Effect of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated Nickel-Titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
(A–D) Different views of the dynamic cyclic fatigue hardware device, (E) detail of the artificial root canal inside the artificial root canal support with the LDR sensor placed at working lenght, (F) detail of the Arduino board, gear motor, (G) detail of the artificial root canal and LED at 3 mm from working length, and (H) detail of the intimate contact between the artificial root canal and the NiTi endodontic reciprocating file.
Figure 1.
(A–D) Different views of the dynamic cyclic fatigue hardware device, (E) detail of the artificial root canal inside the artificial root canal support with the LDR sensor placed at working lenght, (F) detail of the Arduino board, gear motor, (G) detail of the artificial root canal and LED at 3 mm from working length, and (H) detail of the intimate contact between the artificial root canal and the NiTi endodontic reciprocating file.
Figure 2.
(A) Stainless steel artificial root canal plates, (B) CAD/CAE 2D/3D design of the artificial root canal support, and (C) CAD/CAE 2D/3D design of the LED-LDR detection complex.
Figure 2.
(A) Stainless steel artificial root canal plates, (B) CAD/CAE 2D/3D design of the artificial root canal support, and (C) CAD/CAE 2D/3D design of the LED-LDR detection complex.
Figure 3.
Box plot of the time to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the respective median value.
Figure 3.
Box plot of the time to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the respective median value.
Figure 4.
(A) Weibull probability plot of time to failure for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Figure 4.
(A) Weibull probability plot of time to failure for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Figure 5.
Box plot of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the median value.
Figure 5.
Box plot of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the median value.
Figure 6.
(A) Weibull probability plot of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Figure 6.
(A) Weibull probability plot of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Figure 7.
Box plot of the number of cycles of in-and-out movement for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the median value.
Figure 7.
Box plot of the number of cycles of in-and-out movement for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups. The horizontal line in each box represents the median value.
Figure 8.
(A) Weibull probability plot of the number of cycles of in-and-out movements for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Figure 8.
(A) Weibull probability plot of the number of cycles of in-and-out movements for the time of use and (B) sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 1.
Descriptive analysis of the time to failure in relation to time of use and number of sterilization cycles.
Table 1.
Descriptive analysis of the time to failure in relation to time of use and number of sterilization cycles.
| Time of Use | Sterilization Cycles | n | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Fracture Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 s | 0 a | 10 | 235.29 | 45.07 | 153.20 | 282.83 | 3.06 |
| 1 a | 10 | 239.55 | 35.54 | 176.75 | 276.66 | 3.10 | |
| 5 a | 10 | 225.26 | 32.04 | 164.10 | 265.31 | 3.17 | |
| 10 a | 10 | 235.30 | 32.83 | 182.28 | 276.91 | 3.04 | |
| 60 s | 0 b | 10 | 195.59 | 45.56 | 112.84 | 242.92 | 3.13 |
| 1 b | 10 | 191.45 | 31.82 | 136.77 | 234.89 | 3.06 | |
| 5 b | 10 | 182.64 | 28.97 | 132.47 | 216.00 | 3.01 | |
| 10 b | 10 | 191.18 | 29.71 | 145.94 | 234.33 | 3.04 | |
| 120 | 0 c | 10 | 88.58 | 12.39 | 61.82 | 102.35 | 3.11 |
| 1 c | 10 | 80.85 | 9.70 | 61.91 | 92.87 | 3.08 | |
| 5 c | 10 | 86.90 | 9.56 | 72.16 | 102.01 | 2.99 | |
| 10 c | 10 | 97.62 | 10.40 | 82.09 | 121.11 | 3.02 |
a,b,c Statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 2.
Weibull statistics of time to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 2.
Weibull statistics of time to failure for the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups.
| Study Group | Weibull Shape (β) | Weibull Scale (η) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | |
| 0 s | 8.3142 | 1.0833 | 6.4404 | 10.7332 | 248.5615 | 4.9655 | 239.0173 | 258.4868 |
| 60 s | 6.8989 | 0.8808 | 5.3716 | 8.8603 | 203.9091 | 4.9179 | 194.4944 | 213.7794 |
| 120 s | 8.0777 | 0.9119 | 6.4743 | 10.0782 | 93.5190 | 1.9349 | 89.8025 | 97.3892 |
| 0 cycles | 2.7040 | 0.4074 | 2.0127 | 3.6328 | 195.6014 | 13.9108 | 170.1516 | 224.8576 |
| 1cycle | 2.6640 | 0.4060 | 1.9761 | 3.5913 | 192.7207 | 13.8859 | 167.3392 | 221.9521 |
| 5 cycles | 2.9873 | 0.4529 | 2.2195 | 4.0208 | 185.5872 | 11.9333 | 163.6121 | 210.5138 |
| 10 cycles | 3.1770 | 0.4761 | 2.3685 | 4.2617 | 195.9868 | 11.8612 | 174.0652 | 220.6693 |
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of the number of cycles to failure of the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of the number of cycles to failure of the time of use and the sterilization cycles study groups.
| Time of Use | Sterilization Cycles | n | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Fracture Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 s | 0 a | 10 | 1176.35 | 225.32 | 766.00 | 1414.00 | 3.06 |
| 1 a | 10 | 1259.40 | 162.90 | 989.50 | 1500.00 | 3.10 | |
| 5 a | 10 | 1120.85 | 156.52 | 820.50 | 1316.50 | 3.17 | |
| 10 a | 10 | 1176.44 | 164.09 | 911.35 | 1384.50 | 3.04 | |
| 60 s | 0 b | 10 | 977.90 | 227.76 | 564.00 | 1214.50 | 3.13 |
| 1 b | 10 | 954.80 | 157.00 | 684.00 | 1174.50 | 3.06 | |
| 5 b | 10 | 913.30 | 144.78 | 662.50 | 1080.00 | 3.01 | |
| 10 b | 10 | 955.80 | 148.54 | 729.50 | 1171.50 | 3.04 | |
| 120 | 0 c | 10 | 442.96 | 61.98 | 309.10 | 512.00 | 3.11 |
| 1 c | 10 | 404.26 | 48.51 | 309.55 | 464.35 | 3.08 | |
| 5 c | 10 | 431.98 | 48.33 | 360.80 | 510.00 | 2.99 | |
| 10 c | 10 | 488.12 | 51.96 | 410.45 | 605.50 | 3.02 |
a,b,c Statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 4.
Weibull statistics of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 4.
Weibull statistics of the number of cycles to failure for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
| Study Group | Weibull Shape (β) | Weibull Scale (η) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | |
| 0 s | 8.1790 | 1.0424 | 6.3712 | 10.4999 | 1257.379 | 25.5617 | 1208.264 | 1308.4906 |
| 60 s | 6.9078 | 0.8808 | 5.3803 | 8.8690 | 1018.7335 | 24.5392 | 971.7553 | 1067.9829 |
| 120 s | 8.0244 | 0.9069 | 6.4301 | 10.0141 | 467.0982 | 9.7300 | 448.4118 | 486.5633 |
| 0 cycles | 2.7040 | 0.4074 | 2.0127 | 3.6328 | 195.6014 | 13.9108 | 170.1516 | 224.8576 |
| 1cycle | 2.6640 | 0.4060 | 1.9761 | 3.5913 | 192.7207 | 13.8859 | 167.3392 | 221.9521 |
| 5 cycles | 2.9873 | 0.4529 | 2.2195 | 4.0208 | 185.5872 | 11.9333 | 163.6121 | 210.5138 |
| 10 cycles | 3.1770 | 0.4761 | 2.3685 | 4.2617 | 195.9868 | 11.8612 | 174.0652 | 220.6693 |
Table 5.
Descriptive statistics of the number of cycles of in-and-out movement for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 5.
Descriptive statistics of the number of cycles of in-and-out movement for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
| Time of Use | Sterilization Cycles | n | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Fracture Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0s | 0 a | 10 | 235.29 | 45.07 | 153.20 | 282.83 | 3.06 |
| 1 a | 10 | 239.55 | 35.54 | 176.75 | 276.66 | 3.10 | |
| 5 a | 10 | 225.26 | 32.04 | 164.10 | 265.31 | 3.17 | |
| 10 a | 10 | 229.30 | 46.31 | 122.28 | 276.91 | 3.04 | |
| 60s | 0 b | 10 | 214.69 | 30.30 | 162.27 | 251.10 | 3.13 |
| 1 b | 10 | 205.45 | 38.46 | 136.77 | 265.01 | 3.06 | |
| 5 b | 10 | 186.64 | 38.88 | 132.47 | 246.87 | 3.01 | |
| 10 b | 10 | 183.18 | 48.23 | 113.82 | 264.33 | 3.04 | |
| 120 | 0 c | 10 | 88.58 | 12.39 | 61.82 | 102.35 | 3.11 |
| 1 c | 10 | 80.85 | 9.70 | 61.91 | 92.87 | 3.08 | |
| 5 c | 10 | 86.90 | 9.56 | 72.16 | 102.01 | 2.99 | |
| 10 c | 10 | 97.62 | 10.40 | 82.09 | 121.11 | 3.02 |
a,b,c Statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 6.
Weibull statistics of the number of cycles of in-and-out movements for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
Table 6.
Weibull statistics of the number of cycles of in-and-out movements for the time of use and sterilization cycles study groups.
| Study Group | Weibull Shape (β) | Weibull Scale (η) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | Estimate | St Error | Lower | Upper | |
| 0 s | 7.8371 | 1.0332 | 6.0526 | 10.1478 | 247.8093 | 5.2331 | 237.7620 | 258.2813 |
| 60 s | 5.9056 | 0.7502 | 4.6039 | 7.5752 | 213.5034 | 6.0177 | 202.0287 | 225.6298 |
| 120 s | 8.0777 | 0.9119 | 6.4743 | 10.0782 | 93.5190 | 1.9349 | 89.8025 | 97.3892 |
| 0 cycles | 2.8397 | 0.4369 | 2.1004 | 3.8391 | 202.3470 | 13.6633 | 177.2639 | 230.9795 |
| 1cycle | 2.6486 | 0.4087 | 1.9573 | 3.5841 | 198.0170 | 14.3348 | 171.8235 | 228.2036 |
| 5 cycles | 2.9091 | 0.4413 | 2.1610 | 3.9163 | 187.3384 | 12.3756 | 164.5872 | 213.2345 |
| 10 cycles | 2.8747 | 0.4233 | 2.1540 | 3.8366 | 191.7153 | 12.8646 | 168.0889 | 218.6626 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zubizarreta-Macho, Á.; Alonso-Ezpeleta, Ó.; Albaladejo Martínez, A.; Faus Matoses, V.; Caviedes Brucheli, J.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Mena Álvarez, J.; Vizmanos Martínez-Berganza, F. Novel Electronic Device to Quantify the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Reciprocating Files after Using and Sterilization. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144962
AMA Style
Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Alonso-Ezpeleta Ó, Albaladejo Martínez A, Faus Matoses V, Caviedes Brucheli J, Agustín-Panadero R, Mena Álvarez J, Vizmanos Martínez-Berganza F. Novel Electronic Device to Quantify the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Reciprocating Files after Using and Sterilization. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(14):4962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144962
Chicago/Turabian StyleZubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro, Óscar Alonso-Ezpeleta, Alberto Albaladejo Martínez, Vicente Faus Matoses, Javier Caviedes Brucheli, Rubén Agustín-Panadero, Jesús Mena Álvarez, and Fernando Vizmanos Martínez-Berganza. 2020. "Novel Electronic Device to Quantify the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Reciprocating Files after Using and Sterilization" Applied Sciences 10, no. 14: 4962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144962
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
