Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Direct Injected Liquefied Petroleum Gas-Diesel Blends for Ultra-Low Soot Combustion Engine Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Spraying of Viscous Liquids: Influence of Fluid-Mixing Mechanism on the Performance of Internal-Mixing Twin-Fluid Atomizers
Previous Article in Journal
Using Synthetic Data to Improve and Evaluate the Tracking Performance of Construction Workers on Site
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study of Entrainment and Mixing of Renewable Active Particles in Fluidized Beds
Open AccessArticle

Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers

1
National Laboratory of Energy and Geology, Estrada Paço Lumiar, 22, Ed. G, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3512 Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(14), 4951; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144951
Received: 4 June 2020 / Revised: 14 July 2020 / Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published: 18 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermal Utilization of Fuels)
Since ashes are a possible source of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) contamination, their application in soils must be subject to more study and control. In this scope, feed residual forest biomasses and biomass ashes, collected along one year in four biomass power stations, were characterized mainly for their polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) contents. The biomasses present concerning levels of Cl (0.04–0.28%) that may lead to PCDD/Fs formation. The biomasses also contain OCDD (29–260 ng/kg) and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (35 ng/kg) that may contribute to increased Toxic Equivalents (TEQs) of ashes, possibly involving dechlorination and ash enrichment mechanisms. While the WHO2005-TEQs in bottom ashes (14–20 ng TEQ/kg) reaches the proposed limit (20 ng TEQ/kg) for ash use as fertilizers, in fly ashes (35–1139 ng TEQ/kg) the limit is exceeded. PAHs are below 0.02 mg/kg in bottom ashes and 1.5–2.5 mg/kg in fly ashes, complying with the proposed limit of 6 mg/kg. As bottom and fly ash streams may contain different ash flows, a clear definition of ash mixes is required. Correlations between unburned carbon (C), PAHs and PCDD/Fs were not found, which highlights the need for compulsory PCDD/Fs analysis in ashes, independently of their origin, burnout degree or levels of other contaminants. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of handling non-detected values, which showed more impact for TEQs values close to the proposed regulatory limit of PCDD/Fs. These findings highlight the need to define reporting protocols of analytical results for risk assessments and conformity evaluation. View Full-Text
Keywords: residual forest biomass; combustion; ash; fertilizers; PCDD/Fs; PAHs; TEQs; BaP-EQs; non-detected handling; regulatory limits residual forest biomass; combustion; ash; fertilizers; PCDD/Fs; PAHs; TEQs; BaP-EQs; non-detected handling; regulatory limits
MDPI and ACS Style

Lopes, H.; Proença, S. Insights into PCDD/Fs and PAHs in Biomass Boilers Envisaging Risks of Ash Use as Fertilizers. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4951.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop