Next Article in Journal
Developing Effective Collaborations: Learning from Our Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Results of SME Investment Activities: A Comparative Analysis among Enterprises Using and Not Using EU Subsidies in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges for Management in Implementing Reforms at the Ministry Level and in Health and Social Service Organizations in Finland
Open AccessArticle

Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review

1
Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
2
Department of Geography, Faculty of Geography and Geoscience, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, 54296 Trier, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030067
Received: 2 July 2019 / Revised: 9 August 2019 / Accepted: 30 August 2019 / Published: 6 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship)
Universities play pivotal roles when research findings are to be adopted commercially. Although these roles vary from one country to another, effective patenting and licensing procedures, as well as eventual commercialisation of scholarly inventions, reflect hard work on the part of the University mediating between the researcher and the industry through technology transfer offices (TTOs) in order to ensure that knowledge-developers take motivational and monetary credit for their findings. This paper details some existing models, processes, and roles taken up in some countries where sharing of intellectual property exists, and links it up with aspects of university–industry technology transfer, such as policies surrounding patenting, government investment and marketing, and the process of academic entrepreneurship, among others. 22 articles were found via a systematic review of literature and analysed with respect to four identified areas of focus: internal strategy, investment and market, academic entrepreneurship and policy. Based on models, processes, and roles in reviewed studies, our results indicate that new models for technology transfer mainly stem from the fact that there is no universally accepted model in the literature. Furthermore, management of technology transfer is mostly the responsibility of TTOs in most countries. While university TTOs act as intermediaries to protect the interest of the author/inventor, issues such as poor relationships between universities and industry, as well as funding, remain major challenges in many emerging economies. In contrast, researchers in western economies are mainly challenged by financial motivation and recognition within the academic domains. View Full-Text
Keywords: technology transfer models; universities; systematic review; management; commercialisation technology transfer models; universities; systematic review; management; commercialisation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Maresova, P.; Stemberkova, R.; Fadeyi, O. Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 67.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop