Next Article in Journal
Is Self-Regulation Sufficient? Case of the German Transparency Code
Previous Article in Journal
The Dilemma of Incumbents in Sustainability Transitions: A Narrative Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2015

by
Administrative Sciences Editorial Office
MDPI AG, Klybeckstrasse 64, CH-4057 Basel, Switzerland
Adm. Sci. 2016, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6010002
Submission received: 25 January 2016 / Accepted: 25 January 2016 / Published: 25 January 2016
The editors of Administrative Sciences would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2015.
We greatly appreciate the contribution of expert reviewers, which is crucial to the journal’s editorial decision-making process. Several steps have been taken in 2015 to thank and acknowledge reviewers. Good, timely reviews are rewarded with a discount off their next MDPI publication. By creating an account on the submission system, reviewers can access details of their past reviews, see the comments of other reviewers, and download a letter of acknowledgement for their records. This is all done, of course, within the constraints of reviewer confidentiality. Feedback from reviewers shows that most see their task as a voluntary and mostly unseen work in service to the scientific community. We are grateful to our reviewers for the contribution they make.
Arugay, AriesLichtenstein, Benyamin B.Roberts, Joseph
Aubry, MoniqueLüdeke-Freund, FlorianRutti, Raina
Beurs, Edwin deLund, Dorthe HedenstedSaunders, Lance
Blackburn, Richard S.Mason-Jones, RachelSchmidpeter, René
Blanchard, AnitaMatsuda, YasuhikoSchot, Johan
Cao, XuanweiMukherjee, DeeprajSidel, John
Dannevig, HalvorNielsen, Jeppe AggerStebbins, Robert A.
Devoto, FlorenciaO'Neill, KirstieStorm, Rasmus
Diamond, JohnOfir, ChezySturdy, Andrew
Duff, Rory RidleyOgata, KenSwords, Jon
Gaudenzi, BarbaraOkamuro, HiroyukiTabibzadeh, Maryam
Gelb, AlanPace, StefanoTajeddini, Kayhan
Honig, BensonPaquet, MireilleTurbide, Johanne
Jaskyte, KristinaPasman, Hans J.Wagensveld, Koos
Ketels, ChristianPhillimore, JennyWashburn, Mark
Kiese, MatthiasPuyvelde, Stijn VanWells, Peter
Klakegg, Ole JonnyRapert, Molly I.Welsch, Harlod
Lehner, OthmarReckien, Diana

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2015. Adm. Sci. 2016, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6010002

AMA Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2015. Administrative Sciences. 2016; 6(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. 2016. "Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2015" Administrative Sciences 6, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6010002

APA Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. (2016). Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2015. Administrative Sciences, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop