Sustainable Inclusion: Emerging Technologies, Innovative Learning Environments, and Entrepreneurial Learning in the Context of Individual and Societal Variability
1. Individual and Societal Variability: A Central Challenge in Entrepreneurial Learning
- Tailoring Entrepreneurial Learning to Diverse Individual Needs: A significant challenge persists in designing entrepreneurial learning programs that genuinely adapt to varied cognitive styles, socio-emotional needs, and learning paces (He & Quay, 2025). This requires insight into how foundational skills, self-assessment mechanisms, and varying individual competencies dynamically influence entrepreneurial readiness and intention, moving beyond a uniform pedagogical model.
- Equitable Integration of Emerging Technologies: Despite their immense transformative potential (AI, VR, AR, blockchain) to personalize learning and democratize access, understanding how these technologies can be strategically utilized to accommodate for individual variability without inadvertently exacerbating existing digital divides or overlooking crucial ethical considerations and digital rights remains a complex undertaking (Iqbal et al., 2025a, 2025b).
- Fostering Entrepreneurial Thinking within Broad Societal Contexts: Entrepreneurial learning must evolve to serve all populations, which demands the development of educational policies and strategies that actively address historical marginalization and ensure equitable access for diverse communities, including indigenous groups. The influence of demographic shifts and persistent inequalities on entrepreneurial opportunities and learning outcomes remains a complex issue requiring nuanced, context-specific solutions (Baalbaki & El Khoury, 2025).
- Holistic Integration of Sustainability and Social Impact: While economic value creation is a traditional focus of entrepreneurship, there is an increasing demand for entrepreneurial education to incorporate sustainable practices and social entrepreneurship principles more deeply (Robles, 2024). The challenge lies in equipping learners to create ventures that balance profit with positive societal and environmental impact, fostering a broader sense of responsibility from the outset of their entrepreneurial journey.
- Cultivating Supportive Ecosystems and Adaptive Leadership: Effective entrepreneurial learning depends not only on individual initiatives but also on the strength of supportive ecosystems (academia, incubators, science parks) and the foresight of their leadership (Kyriakopoulos, 2024). A key challenge is understanding how these external environments and their leadership structures can be intentionally designed and managed to acknowledge, nurture, and facilitate the diverse entrepreneurial pathways of all learners, including addressing the impact of organizational climate and leadership styles on innovation and well-being.
- Breaking Disciplinary Silos for Comprehensive Entrepreneurial Solutions: The complexity of modern global challenges necessitates robust interdisciplinary collaboration. A significant gap exists in effectively integrating entrepreneurial concepts across diverse fields—from STEM to the humanities and social sciences—to foster creativity and adaptability, enabling learners to develop novel, holistic solutions that transcend conventional disciplinary boundaries (Audretsch et al., 2024).
2. Our Contribution: A Comprehensive Exploration
3. Contributions of the Special Issue
- Foundational Skills for Entrepreneurial Readiness: The contributions by Bashir et al. (2025) underscore how information literacy impacts entrepreneurial readiness, emphasizing digital competencies crucial for aspiring entrepreneurs. Ceresia (2023) presents an interactive learning environment for the online self-assessment of performance management capabilities, catering to individual learning styles and self-assessment needs. These papers explore how foundational competencies and self-perception influence entrepreneurial intentions and capabilities, offering valuable insights for designing more effective and personalized entrepreneurial education.
- Organizational Context and Leadership in Fostering Entrepreneurial Learning: A significant portion of this Special Issue delves into the organizational and leadership factors that shape innovative behavior and employee well-being within educational settings, which are foundational for cultivating entrepreneurial mindsets among students and faculty alike. Zargar et al. (2025) demonstrate how work engagement and perceived organizational support drive innovative work behavior among university teachers. Similarly, Hassanein et al. (2025a) explore the linkage between supportive leadership, perceived organizational support, and the organizational climate in terms of employee well-being in academia. Conversely, another contribution by Hassanein et al. (2025b) highlights the detrimental impact of toxic leadership on job satisfaction in the Middle Eastern education sector, underscoring societal variability in leadership effectiveness and its consequences for fostering an entrepreneurial culture. Furthermore, Rivera et al. (2025) emphasize the importance of relational capital within organizational contexts as a key component for facilitating entrepreneurial learning and collaboration.
- Leveraging Technology for Sustainable and Inclusive Entrepreneurial Learning: This Special Issue features papers directly exploring the nexus of technology, sustainability, and inclusion in entrepreneurial education. Cocu et al. (2025) offer a practical framework for integrating technology-enabled entrepreneurship education with a focus on green and sustainable practices, providing concrete digital tools for educators. Fariña-Sánchez and Gutiérrez-Santiuste (2024) provide empirical evidence on gender disparities and the observance of digital rights among young entrepreneurs, directly addressing aspects of societal variability and the need for equitable access and protection in the digital entrepreneurial space, thus informing inclusive entrepreneurial learning strategies. Additionally, Shaukat et al. (2024) reinforce the importance of information literacy, creativity, and lifelong learning in media professionals, highlighting these skills as increasingly intertwined with digital entrepreneurial endeavors and continuous adaptation.
- Promoting Interdisciplinary Approaches and Ecosystem Development: While not explicitly separate themes in the paper listings, the collected works collectively demonstrate the value of interdisciplinary thinking and the nurturing of entrepreneurial ecosystems. By showcasing research from varied fields and contexts (e.g., ethical leadership in academia influencing innovation and digital rights for young entrepreneurs), this volume implicitly advocates for integrated educational frameworks and robust support structures that recognize and cultivate the unique contributions individuals from diverse backgrounds can bring to entrepreneurial endeavors. This highlights how formal and informal learning environments contribute to an overall entrepreneurial capacity, emphasizing the importance of supportive organizational and institutional climates for fostering innovation and entrepreneurial thinking among both faculty and students.
4. Future Research Directions
- Deepen Inclusion and Intersectionality: Future research should explore the intersectional experiences of diverse groups (e.g., indigenous entrepreneurs, individuals with disabilities, refugees, or specific ethnic minorities) within innovative learning environments and entrepreneurial ecosystems (Krüger & David, 2020; Tamtik, 2020). More qualitative and mixed-methods studies are needed to capture these nuanced narratives.
- Longitudinal Impact Assessment: Critical longitudinal studies are needed to track the long-term impact of innovative pedagogies on entrepreneurial success, sustainable practices, and social impact across diverse learner populations (Arendt et al., 2025; Herlina & Wahira, 2024).
- Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies: As AI and other advanced technologies integrate further, research must critically examine their ethical implications for entrepreneurial learners, including algorithmic bias in support systems, data privacy, and ensuring equitable access (Jain & Menon, 2023; Sahoo et al., 2024).
- Measure “Sustainable Entrepreneurial Mindsets”: Develop robust metrics to assess the cultivation of entrepreneurial mindsets that prioritize environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and identify effective pedagogical approaches for this (Lehmann et al., 2024; Ragazou et al., 2024).
- Policy Coherence: Further empirical research is needed to evaluate policies promoting inclusive entrepreneurship education, including comparative studies across different national or regional contexts to identify best practices.
- Role of Informal Learning: Explore the significant role of informal learning, mentorship networks, and community-based initiatives in fostering entrepreneurial learning and sustainable inclusion, particularly for those without access to traditional academic institutions (Suryono et al., 2023).
- Adaptive Leadership Models: Investigate adaptive leadership models tailored for dynamic, technology-driven entrepreneurial learning environments, focusing on cultivating resilience, psychological safety, and continuous learning sensitive to individual and societal variability among entrepreneurial learners.
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arendt, K. M., Christensen, B. T., Jensen, V. M., Rangvid, B. S., & Bille, T. (2025). Beyond entrepreneurship education: The long-term impact of higher education teaching models on new venture creation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 31(11), 26–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audretsch, D. B., Aparicio, S., Hughes, M. M., & Urbano, D. (2024). Linking entrepreneurship and society: Solutions for today and tomorrow. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baalbaki, C., & El Khoury, A. (2025). Rural entrepreneurship and inequality: Exploring trends in emerging economies through the lens of Lebanon. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 17(1), 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, I., Talha, Naveed, M. A., Asghar, M. Z., & Rasool, S. F. (2025). From info seeker to startup superhero: How information literacy influences entrepreneurial intention and skills among business students. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceresia, F. (2023). A system dynamics-based interactive learning environment for online formative (self-)assessment of wanna-be entrepreneurs’ performance management capabilities. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cocu, A., Pecheanu, E., Susnea, I., Dingli, S., Istrate, A., & Tudorie, C. (2025). Technology-enabled learning for green and sustainable entrepreneurship education. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchek, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial resilience: A biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 429–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fariña-Sánchez, M., & Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. (2024). Gender and digital rights: An empirical study among young entrepreneurs. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanein, F. R., Daouk, A., Bou Zakhem, N., ElSayed, R. A., Tahan, S., Houmani, H., & Al Dilby, H. K. (2025a). An analysis of perceived organizational support and organizational climate on the supportive leadership–employee wellbeing linkage in the lebanese academic sector. Administrative Sciences, 15(6), 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanein, F. R., Mohammadi, S., & Zargar, P. (2025b). Toxic leadership and job satisfaction in the middle eastern education sector: The influence of organizational culture and trust. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J. J., & Quay, C. (2025). Creating inclusive entrepreneurship in interdisciplinary pedagogy. In Annals of entrepreneurship education and pedagogy—2025 (pp. 409–415). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herlina, H., & Wahira, W. (2024). Creating a sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystem through innovation in education. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, J., Asgarova, V., Hashmi, Z. F., Ngajie, B. N., Asghar, M. Z., & Järvenoja, H. (2025a). Exploring faculty experiences with generative artificial intelligence tools integration in second language curricula in Chinese higher education. Discover Computing, 28(1), 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, J., Hashmi, Z. F., Asghar, M. Z., & Abid, M. N. (2025b). Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 16610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jain, L. R., & Menon, V. (2023, November 6–8). AI algorithmic bias: Understanding its causes, ethical and social implications. 2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) (pp. 460–467), Atlanta, GA, USA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krüger, D., & David, A. (2020). Entrepreneurial education for persons with disabilities—A social innovation approach for inclusive ecosystems. Frontiers in Education, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyriakopoulos, P. (2024). The ‘hearts and lungs’ of a booming rural entrepreneurial ecosystem: Re-conceptualising science parks in emerging markets. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehmann, E. E., Otto, J. M., & Wirsching, K. (2024). Entrepreneurial universities and the third mission paradigm shift from economic performance to impact entrepreneurship: Germany’s EXIST program and ESG orientation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6), 2184–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragazou, K., Nikolaos, S., Garefalakis, A., & Papademetriou, C. (2024). Improving the effectiveness of entrepreneurs by integrating environmental, social, and governance principles into the management of human resources. In ESG and total quality management in human resources (pp. 243–260). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera, A. E., Rivera-González, G., Escamilla-García, P. E., & Carrillo Gamboa, J. (2025). Exploring the mystery of relational capital in an organizational context. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robles, S. (2024). Toward sustainable futures: Enhancing inclusive transdisciplinary skills and inner development goals in sustainable entrepreneurship education. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 6, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, D. K., Hung, T. H., Kumar, A., & Kanwal, P. (2024). Ethical AI in entrepreneurship (pp. 137–164). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaukat, R., Naveed, M. A., Asghar, M. Z., Järvenoja, H., & Hassan, M. U. U. (2024). Measuring the nexus between information literacy, creativity, and lifelong learning in media professionals. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suryono, J., Wijaya, M., Irianto, H., Harisudin, M., Tri Rahayu, N., Darsini, D., Astuti, P. I., & Sri Kusumawati, H. (2023). Model of community empowerment through education non-formal entrepreneurship to improve independence of micro, small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 413–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamtik, M. (2020). Informing canadian innovation policy through a decolonizing lens on indigenous entrepreneurship and innovation. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 50(3), 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C. L., & Chugh, H. (2014). Entrepreneurial learning: Past research and future challenges. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 24–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zargar, P., Daouk, A., & Chahine, S. (2025). Driving innovative work behavior among university teachers through work engagement and perceived organizational support. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y., Li, T., & Liu, W. (2023). The benefits and drawbacks of standardized curriculum in education. Research and Advances in Education, 2(10), 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Asghar, M.Z.; Rasool, S.F. Sustainable Inclusion: Emerging Technologies, Innovative Learning Environments, and Entrepreneurial Learning in the Context of Individual and Societal Variability. Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080292
Asghar MZ, Rasool SF. Sustainable Inclusion: Emerging Technologies, Innovative Learning Environments, and Entrepreneurial Learning in the Context of Individual and Societal Variability. Administrative Sciences. 2025; 15(8):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080292
Chicago/Turabian StyleAsghar, Muhammad Zaheer, and Samma Faiz Rasool. 2025. "Sustainable Inclusion: Emerging Technologies, Innovative Learning Environments, and Entrepreneurial Learning in the Context of Individual and Societal Variability" Administrative Sciences 15, no. 8: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080292
APA StyleAsghar, M. Z., & Rasool, S. F. (2025). Sustainable Inclusion: Emerging Technologies, Innovative Learning Environments, and Entrepreneurial Learning in the Context of Individual and Societal Variability. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080292