Next Article in Journal
The Role of Monetary Incentives: Bonus and/or Stimulus
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2019
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Value of High School Graduation in the United States: Per-Person Shadow Price Estimates for Use in Cost–Benefit Analysis
Article

The Social Cost of Informal Electronic Waste Processing in Southern China

1
Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
2
KPMG LLP, 777 Dunsmuir St., Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K3, Canada
3
Centre for Social Innovation & Impact Investing (S3i), Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010007
Received: 16 December 2019 / Revised: 22 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published: 5 February 2020
Large amounts of e-waste are processed “informally” in lower income countries. Such processing releases dangerous pollutants, which increase mortality and reduce cognitive functioning. This paper estimates the social cost of informal e-waste processing in Southern China. This parameter may be “plugged-in” to cost-benefit analyses that evaluate the economic efficiency of policies to reduce informal e-waste processing in China or other lower income countries. It may also be used in the estimation of the social benefits (or costs) of new or proposed e-waste processing policies in higher income countries. We estimate that the social cost of informal e-waste processing in Guiyu is about $529 million. This amount is equivalent to about $423 per tonne (in 2018 US dollars) or $3528 per person, which is over half the gross income per capita of the residents of Guiyu. We also perform sensitivity analysis that varies the estimated mortality outcomes, the value of a statistical life and the amount of e-waste processed. View Full-Text
Keywords: social cost; cost-benefit analysis; electronic waste processing; shadow price social cost; cost-benefit analysis; electronic waste processing; shadow price
MDPI and ACS Style

Boardman, A.; Geng, J.; Lam, B. The Social Cost of Informal Electronic Waste Processing in Southern China. Adm. Sci. 2020, 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010007

AMA Style

Boardman A, Geng J, Lam B. The Social Cost of Informal Electronic Waste Processing in Southern China. Administrative Sciences. 2020; 10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boardman, Anthony, Jeff Geng, and Bruno Lam. 2020. "The Social Cost of Informal Electronic Waste Processing in Southern China" Administrative Sciences 10, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010007

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop