Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Ambient Temperature and Mental Health in the USA
Next Article in Special Issue
Ammonia Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria in East Asian Paddy Soils—A Mini Review
Previous Article in Journal
Biological Treatment by Active Sludge with High Biomass Concentration at Laboratory Scale for Mixed Inflow of Sunflower Oil and Saccharose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applicability of a Freundlich-Like Model for Plant Uptake at an Industrial Contaminated Site with a High Variable Arsenic Concentration
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Environments 2017, 4(4), 70;

Nitrate Leaching from Sand and Pumice Geomedia Amended with Pyrogenic Carbon Materials

School of Earth, Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA
Harlingen Waterworks System, Harlingen, TX 78550, USA
Civil Engineering, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 September 2017 / Revised: 24 September 2017 / Accepted: 30 September 2017 / Published: 3 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil and Water Contamination, Remediation and Conservation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1394 KB, uploaded 9 October 2017]   |  


There is increasing interest in using pyrogenic carbon as an adsorbent for aqueous contaminants in stormwater. The objective of this study was to investigate pyrogenic carbon materials as an amendment to geomedia to reduce nitrate leaching. Batch adsorption and column experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of a commercial activated carbon and two biochars incorporated (5% by weight) into sand and pumice columns. The batch adsorption with 50 mg L−1 of nitrate solution showed that only activated carbon resulted in a substantial adsorption for nitrate up to 41%. Tested biochars were not effective in removing aqueous nitrate and even released nitrate (<1%) with 1 h reaction time. Column experiment with a pulse input of nitrate solution (50 mg L−1) confirmed that the sand or pumice columns amended with biochars were not as effective as those amended with activated carbon for reducing nitrate leaching. Our results suggested that net negatively charged surfaces of biochar may inhibit nitrate anion adsorption while activated carbon has reactive sites containing acidic functional groups to improve nitrate retention. There was no difference between sand and pumice for nitrate retention in any of the carbon amendments. Additional surface activation process during biochar production may be needed to improve adsorptive capacity of biochar for aqueous nitrate removal. View Full-Text
Keywords: activated carbon; adsorption; biochar; bioswale; nitrate; pumice activated carbon; adsorption; biochar; bioswale; nitrate; pumice

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, J.; Davila, M.; Mireles, S.; Ho, J. Nitrate Leaching from Sand and Pumice Geomedia Amended with Pyrogenic Carbon Materials. Environments 2017, 4, 70.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Environments EISSN 2076-3298 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top