Next Article in Journal
Understanding Environmental Contamination Through the Lens of the Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus)
Previous Article in Journal
Underwater Noise Assessment in the Romanian Black Sea Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Cradle to Grave: Microplastics—A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations

Department of Pathophysiology, Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2024, 11(12), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263
Submission received: 9 October 2024 / Revised: 16 November 2024 / Accepted: 20 November 2024 / Published: 22 November 2024

Abstract

:
Microplastics have become a ubiquitous pollutant that permeates every aspect of our environment—from the oceans to the soil to the elementary foundations of human life. New findings demonstrate that microplastic particles not only pose a latent threat to adult populations, but also play a serious role even before birth during the fetal stages of human development. Exposure to microplastics during the early childhood stages is another source of risk that is almost impossible to prevent. This comprehensive review examines the multiple aspects associated with microplastics during early human development, detailing the mechanisms by which these particles enter the adult body, their bioaccumulation in tissues throughout life and the inevitable re-entry of these particles into different ecosystems after death.

Graphical Abstract

1. Generation and Composition of Macro-, Micro- and Nanoplastic Particles

Macroplastic items like bottles, packages, toys and the like degrade through various biotic and abiotic processes, each involving different mechanisms and resulting in specific changes to the particles concerning size and composition [1]. Microplastics (MPs) are defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, and nanoplastics (NPs) are defined as particles smaller than 1 µm [2]. Both are found in diverse forms, including spheres, fragments, and fibers with polyester being the most commonly detected polymer in humans, followed by polyamide (PA), polyurethane (PU), polypropylene (PP) and polyacrylate (PAC), as well as polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) [3,4]. The two main categorizations for plastics are thermoplastics and thermoset plastics. While thermoplastics are defined as re-melted pellets used to assemble the final product, thermoset plastics are melted into their final shape using heat. The vast majority (80%) of plastics are thermoplastics which are also the major basis for primary MPs. The essential types of thermoplastics include PE, PP and PVC [5].
Most smaller particles that can be found in the environment arise from the mechanical deterioration of larger pieces of plastics over time, and it is estimated that such fragmentation processes could generate up to >1014 times greater numbers of micro- and nanoplastic (MNP) particles [6]. To understand the fate and consequences of such particles in the environment, it is pivotal to measure their full range of sizes, shapes and composition thereof, and several reviews of MP detection methods have already been published [7,8]. The degradation of plastics involves the breakdown of plastic particles into smaller fragments, potentially reaching the nanoscale [9,10]. Besides mechanical and biological degradation, photo-degradation due to sunlight oxidizing the chemical structure and minimizing the molecular mass might even cause the polymers to become fragile and ultimately break down into the respective monomers [11]. The different processes that contribute to the degradation of macro- and MP particles, each influenced by environmental factors and the chemical nature of the plastic materials themselves, are summarized below (Table 1).

2. Presence of Microplastics in the Environment

Inadequate management of plastic waste disposal procedures and poor recycling efforts have led to increased contamination of our environments, with global plastic waste production approaching an alarming 400 million metric tons (Mt) in 2021 [21,22]. It is estimated that approximately 8.3 billion tons of plastic have been generated globally since 1950 [23]. The unavoidable omnipresence of MNPs throughout different ecosystems and their potential impacts on human health have therefore raised substantial concerns [24,25]. One study suggests that up to 23 million Mt of plastic debris accumulated in the world’s aquatic ecosystems in 2016 alone, which is equal to 11% of the worldwide plastic production in that year [26], while other studies estimate the global plastic production in 2016 to be as high as 335 million Mt [27]. If waste management is not optimized and current trends continue, it is predicted that by 2030 the amount of waste accumulating in global aquatic ecosystems could reach 90 million Mt/year [26]. Although the majority of research is currently focused on MP pollution in marine and freshwater environments [28]—mainly due to key analytical methods for the identification of MPs in soil still missing—several studies suggest a significant presence of MPs in soil environments [29,30]. A study focusing on the effect of MP on plant growth indicates that an increased concentration of these particles in soil may have detrimental consequences for the growth of grass and crop plants by reducing germination and altering the shoot length of the plants [31].

2.1. Drinking Water

MPs have been detected in drinking water across the globe with median concentrations in standard water sources of 2.2 × 103 particles/m3, predominantly with particle sizes exceeding 50 μm [32]. In addition, plastic bottles represent a significant source of MNP exposure for humans, particularly through PP and PET plastic particles released from the caps of such containers [33]. Individual MNP intake naturally varies greatly, depends mainly on the choice of drinking water and lifestyle habits, and has been calculated to be as high as 73,000 particles per year per person [34].

2.2. Food Products

A recent study shows the general exponential increase in MP accumulation in agricultural soils, which is partly due to the increased use of fertilizers [35]. Therefore, it is not surprising that MNP contamination is also widespread in a variety of everyday agricultural food products [36]. The diffusion of MPs in the food supply chain is naturally an area of public concern, as their impact on human health is still largely unknown. Meat and dairy products are of course particularly noteworthy in this context, as the intake of MPs and their accumulation in farm animals can lead to particularly high concentrations in the final food products [37]. For example, particle concentrations between 0.03 and 1.19 particles per gram of meat have been reported, in unprocessed as well as processed products like hamburgers [38,39]. Not surprisingly, MNPs have also been detected in various dairy products such as skim-milk formulations, with average values reaching 40 particles per liter [40,41].
MNP contamination of seafood products is another area of concern. It has been suggested, that the main sources of plastic particles within marine systems result from the fragmentation of bigger plastic items and the application of plastic scrubbers in cleaning products [11]. They are also derived from household and cosmetic products entering aquatic systems via sewage discharge [10,42]. Furthermore, air-blasting technology also contributes to the accumulation of primary MPs [43]. The main principle of this technique involves blasting machines, engines or ship vessels with MP scrubbers to get rid of rust and other debris [44]. Subsequently, MNPs can pass into oceans via municipal drainage systems as well as rivers [45,46]. One study indicates that MP concentrations have increased in plankton samples, which were collected over a period of roughly 40 years in the northeast Atlantic. This would coincide with the steady increase in plastic production worldwide [47]. Aquatic as well as terrestrial animals ingest a huge amount of MNPs accidentally or by confusing plastic particles for food due to their small size [48]. Therefore, they have been found in a number of different animal species, such as fish [49], seals [50], marine worms [50] and seabirds [51].

2.3. Articles of Daily Use and (Leisure) Activities

MNPs are omnipresent in our environment today. We inevitably come into contact with all kinds of plastic particles during everyday activities. We are exposed to them when using individual and public transport vehicles, but also during various leisure activities carried out in indoor sports facilities, when using daily hygiene products or even when simply consuming food and liquids in general. It is now almost impossible to avoid contact with MNPs, which shows how widespread this problem is and how easily it is simultaneously ignored by every individual and society in general.
Concerning food intake, various packaging materials represent a rich source of plastic particles that should not be underestimated under any circumstances, which naturally raises concerns about the transfer of such MNPs into food and beverages. This includes, but is of course not limited to, take-out containers, plastic coffee bags, disposable drinking cups, and food packaging products [52,53,54,55]. Another alarming finding concerns recent reports that MNPs can be released from breastmilk storage bags and subsequently pose a potential health risk for infants [56]. We are also inevitably exposed to MNPs during various sports, recreational and leisure activities. Sports facilities are a rich source of MNPs, both in terms of the provided equipment and one’s own sports- or footwear that is used, and high levels of indoor MNPs can be generated by abrasion [57,58,59]. Similarly, abrasion testing of various consumer items that come directly into contact with mucous membranes, such as female hygiene products and even sex toys, revealed the release of significant amounts of MNPs [60,61].
The problem of MNP generation also plays a major role in connection with individual road traffic, e.g., during commuting and, probably even more important, in connection with transportation via heavy-duty vehicles. Tire wear MPs originating from synthetic rubber tires are in the meantime among the most abundant MPs in the environment [62,63,64,65]. The particles that are released into the environment include tire wear particles, recycled tire crumb and tire repair–polished debris. More precisely, tire wear particles are generated as automobile tire treads wear down on roads, while recycled tire crumb is produced for recycling purposes. This includes the creation of rubber granules for use in artificial turf, basketball courts and recreational areas, typically achieved by mechanically grinding or cryogenically freezing chipped or shredded whole tires [66,67]. It is estimated that there are approximately 21,000 full size pitches and 72,000 so-called mini pitches installed in the EU, most of them made of synthetic turfs from recycled tires, contributing significantly to the generation of sports-associated MNPs [66].

2.4. Leaching Chemicals and Additives

In addition to the physical presence of MNPs, the leaching of chemicals and release of absorbed heavy metals from these particles poses significant environmental and health concerns. Many MNPs contain additives such as Bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates and heavy metals, which can leach into food, beverages, biological tissues and the surrounding environment [68,69]. Especially, chemicals like BPA are known to be endocrine disruptors, which can interfere with normal hormonal functions and, therefore, potentially compromise different aspects of fertility by mimicking and/or blocking natural hormones in the body. The potential for these substances to disrupt endocrine function and negatively impact human health underscores the urgency of addressing the issue of chemical leaching alongside MP pollution [70,71].

3. Uptake and Accumulation of Microplastics in Human Tissues and Organs

3.1. Routes of Exposure

Living organisms are exposed to MNPs mainly through three routes, ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Therefore, such particles can be taken up through polluted water and food, by inhaling air contaminated by natural or anthropogenic sources with particulate matter and cutaneous exposure through, e.g., clothes, as well as personal care and hygiene items. Several tissues are especially prone to accumulation of MPs, as shown in Figure 1. In the colon, concentrations from 7.91 MP/g [72] to 28.1 MP/g [73] have been described. In the small intestine, 9.45 MP/g have been detected, while in lung tissue up to 14.19 MP/g have been found [72]. In the spleen, the reported concentration was 1.1 MP/g [74], and in the liver it reached 4.6 MP/g [74]. Notably, for brain tissue, MP accumulation of up to 8.861 µg/g was reported [75].

3.1.1. Ingestion

Once ingested, MNPs pass through the esophagus into the stomach and can be absorbed by epithelial cells usually within 2–6 h [76]. Insoluble NPs smaller than 1.09 µm can pass through the gut epithelium and enter the bloodstream directly, while larger MPs are typically transported to the mid- and hindgut. MPs as large as 130 µm can move into human tissues through paracellular transport via desorption [77].

3.1.2. Inhalation

Inhalation represents one of the most significant pathways of MNP entry into the body. Airborne particles, depending on their size, can penetrate various regions in the respiratory system. Particles larger than 10 μm generally affect the upper airways, while those smaller than 10 μm can reach the bronchioles. Particles smaller than 2.5 μm in size, including ultrafine particles, are capable of penetrating down to the alveolar region [78]. It is not surprising that urban areas have a high presence of MNPs in the atmosphere, as anthropogenic sources such as industry and traffic are one of the main sources of these particles [79]. However, samples collected in remote areas (e.g., the alps/norther and southern polar ice regions) have also been reported to contain significant amounts of MNPs, highlighting the global threat of these contaminants [80,81].

3.1.3. Dermal Contact

The skin represents a fundamental barrier against most harmful substances from the environment. However, MNPs frequently come into contact with the skin due to topical agents such as cosmetics, hygiene products like tooth paste, pharmaceutical ointments and also medical devices like face masks [82,83]. Subsequently, MNPs might be absorbed in an unspecific way and ultimately accumulate in cells of the epi-/endodermal layers, keratinocytes or immune cells [84,85].

3.2. Particle Uptake and Transport Mechanisms Across Tissue Barriers

After ingestion by swallowing, inhalation or through the skin, different cell types can internalize particles such as MPs, fine dust and color particles in a largely unspecific manner. This process often leads to intracellular accumulation and—subsequently—also to the transfer of these substances to daughter cells following mitosis [86,87,88]. Cellular uptake of MNPs occurs primarily through two mechanisms: endocytosis-based uptake and direct cellular entry. Endocytosis involves several steps, beginning with specific ligands binding to the cell surface receptors resulting in the formation of a ligand-receptor complex. This is followed by nucleation of cytosolic proteins to form a coated pit. Next, the plasma membrane undergoes invagination, followed by the formation of intracellular vesicles. Finally, the coating is removed, and the endocytotic proteins are recovered from the vesicle [89,90,91]. Endocytosis-based cellular uptake includes clathrin-dependent uptake, caveolin-dependent uptake, clathrin- and caveolin-independent uptake, micropinocytosis and phagocytosis [92]. In contrast, some particles can enter cells directly, bypassing the need for these structured pathways, as will be discussed later in this text [92,93,94,95].
In specific tissues, the uptake processes can vary substantially. In the gut, smaller particles (size smaller than 150 µm) can penetrate the mucus layer and are absorbed via endocytosis by enterocytes, transcytosis through M-cells or by passing between cells through paracellular transport [96]. Inhaled MNPs can directly pass through the alveolar epithelium into the bloodstream [96]. Once MNPs enter the bloodstream, infiltration can occur on almost any tissue connected to the circulatory system [97].
Recent studies have demonstrated an additional mechanism of MNP transport via extracellular vesicles (EVs) [98]. These EVs, released by various cell types, play an important role in intercellular communication by transferring molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and also PS MNPs. A recent study demonstrated that such PS-MNPs can be encapsulated within EVs and transferred between cells through EV-mediated communication [98]. Through live-cell imaging, fusion of EVs containing PS-MNPs with recipient cells was described, allowing the PS-MNPs to enter new cells. This shows that EVs can act as a transport mechanism for MNPs, facilitating their movement within tissues and possibly even across biological barriers such as those protecting, e.g., the brain and the placenta. This pathway could, therefore, represent a significant mean by which MNPs are distributed in the body, alongside traditional mechanisms like endocytosis and direct cellular entry [98].
The half-life of these particles in the circulation and therefore the uptake by cells varies based on the size and shape of the nanoparticles. Smaller particles generally demonstrate higher uptake efficiencies due to their ability to cross biological barriers more easily. For instance, in mice, PS particles sized 0.1–1 µm have a half-life of 1.4–4.9 min (with smaller particles persisting longer) [99], while acrylic particles under 1.8 µm last 44–84 min, with quicker clearance when coated in proteins like albumin [100]. In rats, polyacrylamide (PAA) particles sized 0.2–0.3 µm have a half-life of 40 min [101], whereas in rabbits, much smaller PS particles of 0.05–0.06 µm clear in just 0.9 min [102].
In addition to the previously discussed influences of size and protein coating, shape strongly dictates uptake efficiency. Molecular dynamics simulations have shown that spherical nano-sized particles typically internalize via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, while rod-like particles more commonly utilize caveolae-mediated pathways, which bypass lysosomal degradation and may allow more prolonged intracellular persistence [92]. Furthermore, rod-shaped and elongated particles tend to exhibit higher cellular uptake compared to spherical ones due to their ability to form stable adhesions on the membrane surface [92]. The lower uptake efficiency of elongated particles is likely due to the increased membrane tension required to engulf them fully, compared to the relatively simple internalization of spherical particles [94,95].
Additionally, the aspect ratio of rod-shaped nano-sized particles of different compositions has been shown to influence their cellular fate; particles with higher aspect ratios tend to localize preferentially in endosomal or lysosomal compartments [95,103]. Gold nanoparticles with sharp geometries, such as triangular or star-shaped forms, tend to penetrate cellular membranes more effectively. This is likely due to the ability of sharp edges to concentrate force on the membrane, facilitating membrane disruption and subsequent internalization [94]. Studies also suggest that non-spherical particles like nanodisks and nanorods demonstrate enhanced circulation times and reduced clearance rates in comparison to spherical particles, due to differences in their surface interactions with immune cells and serum proteins [95].
The orientation of the rod-shaped particle relative to the membrane is also important. In general, rod-like particles typically undergo stable endocytotic states with a small and high wrapping fraction. When the long axis of a particle aligns parallel to the membrane, it is referred to as the “submarine mode”, a configuration common for particles with high aspect ratios (long and thin shapes) and rounded tips. When the axis is oriented perpendicular to the membrane, it is known as the “rocket mode”, typically seen in particles with smaller aspect ratios and flat tips. Particles with a high aspect ratio often experience a “competition” between these two modes [93]. Studies have shown that particles with high aspect ratios (i.e., longer and thinner shapes) generally exhibit reduced uptake efficiency compared to spherical particles of similar size. This complex interplay of particle properties—such as size, shape and surface characteristics—ultimately determines how efficiently a particle is taken up by cells and how long it remains in circulation within the body [93].

4. Physiological Consequences of Microplastics Exposure During Human Development

4.1. Critical Stages During Early Human Development Affected by Microplastics

The potential health effects of MNPs during embryonal development are an emerging area of research, and while studies are still limited, there is growing concern about the possible far-reaching impact. The early development of all mammals, including humans, involves several critical stages where environmental influences by a multitude of different factors and chemicals can have lasting impacts on health. Therefore, we have summarized possible effects during the fetal stage, the neonatal stage, and the prepubertal stage in more detail (see Figure 1). Each of these periods are characterized by rapid tissue growth, cellular differentiation, and critical biological processes that establish the foundation for future health and also disease susceptibility [104].

4.1.1. Fetal Exposure to Microplastic Particles via the Placental Route

During the fetal stage, development is highly sensitive to environmental influences, as this is when most tissues differentiate (including immune system cells) and cells are still in great plasticity. The blood–placenta barrier (BPB) is a vital structure in pregnancy that helps protect the developing fetus by controlling the exchange of substances between the maternal and fetal bloodstreams. However, recent research has indicated that MPs can cross this barrier, potentially affecting fetal development. For instance, a 2021 study detected MPs in human placentas, suggesting that these particles can be present in the womb and possibly affect embryonal development [105]. MPs can cause inflammation and trigger an immune response in tissues [106,107,108]. If MPs reach the embryonic environment, they could induce local inflammation, potentially disrupting normal development [104,109,110]. The potential health risks associated with such MNP exposure, coupled with the increased vulnerability of fetal development to environmental agents, highlight the critical need to study the maternal-to-fetal transfer of such particles via the placental route. While the placenta is responsible for facilitating the exchange of essential nutrients, gases and waste products for the fetus, it is not completely impermeable to environmental toxicants. The placental barrier is composed of the syncytiotrophoblast layer, cytotrophoblast cells and the endothelial cell layer of the fetal capillaries [111]. There are different ways of transplacental transfer: passive transfer, facilitated diffusion and active transport [112]; Grafmueller et al. stated that the transportation of nanoparticles such as nanoplastics is likely to involve an active, energy-dependent transport [111]. A recent study described MNP fragments with multiple shapes in human placental tissue. MNPs have been found in these samples either on the maternal side, the fetal side or on the chorioamniotic membranes [105]. This finding is significant because the placental barrier serves as a critical interface between the fetus and the external environment, ensuring safe conditions for embryonic development. Using an ex vivo human placenta perfusion model revealed that NPs up to 240 nm were taken up by the placenta and were able to cross the placental barrier without affecting the viability of the placental explant, being transported from the fetal to the maternal blood circulation [113]. This was further corroborated by animal studies that directly fed MP particles to pregnant mice, revealing that these particles were efficiently transported to embryonic tissues, significantly reducing their growth [114]. Additionally, an accumulation of PS beads was also observed in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of placental tissue using an ex vivo human placental perfusion model [111].
The maternal pulmonary exposure (intratracheal instillation) to nano-PS led to the translocation of such particles to placental and fetal tissues in pregnant Sprague Dawley rats making the fetoplacental unit susceptible to adverse effects. These particles were found in the maternal lung, heart and spleen as well as fetal liver, lungs, heart, kidneys and brain. Furthermore, 24 h after maternal exposure, fetal and placental weights were significantly lower (7% and 8%, respectively) compared to control groups [115]. Exposure to harmful substances during this time can disrupt cellular functions and epigenetic programming, potentially leading to long-term health issues. MNPs are considered potent vectors for other environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, organic pollutants and microorganisms, including pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, due to their adsorption properties. Heavy metals like arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc have been detected on MP surfaces [116]. The adverse effects of these pollutants are wide-ranging, including carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, genotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and neurotoxicity [68,117,118]. For example, research has shown that exposure to environmental contaminants during the fetal period can result in epigenetic modifications, affecting gene expression and increasing disease susceptibility later in life [104,110].

4.1.2. Microplastics and the Neonatal Stage

The neonatal stage, immediately following birth, is another window of heightened vulnerability. Newborns can be exposed to MNPs through various sources, similar to adults but with some specific considerations due to their unique environment and activities. After birth, infants continue to be exposed to plastic particles through various sources such as breast milk, toys, baby bottles, formula and household dust (see Table 2). As a consequence, the estimated daily exposure of MNPs by infants up to 12 months old ranges from 14,600 to 4,550,000 particles/d per infant [119].
During this period, the infant’s immune system is still developing, specific tissues are differentiating and the body undergoes crucial physiological adaptations to the external environment. The ingestion or inhalation of MNPs during this time could interfere with these processes, exacerbating the risk of immune system dysfunction or other developmental disorders. Considerable numbers of MNPs have been detected in this respect, highlighting the potential dangers of accumulation during early childhood development (see Table 3). Exposure to irregular MNPs shed from baby bottles was described to activate the ROS/NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway, causing intestinal inflammation [129]. Studies have demonstrated that neonatal exposure to environmental toxins can alter immune responses, increasing the likelihood of developing allergies or autoimmune diseases [130]. In addition, the commonly used stabilizer BPA as well as antioxidants in plastics have been shown to cause proliferation toxicity in human Caco-2 cells, highlighting the danger that is associated with MNP exposure [131].

4.1.3. The Prepubertal Stage

Finally, the prepubertal stage is marked by continued growth and hormonal changes that prepare the body for adolescence and adulthood. The organs are maturing, and there is significant plasticity in specific hormone dependent tissues. Exposure to MNPs during this stage can disrupt endocrine functions, as first described in 1936 by Dodds et al. [133], which is critical for normal growth and reproductive health. Given that MNPs and associated chemicals have been found to possess endocrine-disrupting properties, their presence in the environment could pose significant risks during this sensitive developmental window. Research indicates that endocrine disruptors can interfere with hormone signaling during prepubertal development, leading to reproductive issues and increased cancer risk later in life [134,135].
However, while definitive evidence in humans is still emerging, the potential risks associated with plastic particle exposure during embryonal development and early childhood warrant further investigation. Given the critical nature of this developmental period and the known effects of related environmental toxins, understanding and mitigating exposure to MNPs is crucial for safeguarding fetal and maternal health (see Figure 2).

4.2. The Problem of Lifetime Accumulation of Microplastic Particles

4.2.1. Accumulation of Microplastics in Different Tissues of the Human Body

The potential for MNPs to affect critical periods of development raises concerns about long-term health effects, such as developmental disorders, reduced fertility and increased susceptibility to chronic diseases (see Table 4). The exposure to and accumulation of plastic particles in the human body begins early and continues throughout life. After MNPs enter the human body, it is a priority to understand the distribution of these particles in different tissues (see Table 4). Pristine MNPs, particularly those of ultrafine sizes, have the potential to accumulate in various tissues and organs, leading to histological and biological changes [97]. The accumulation of MNPs in various tissues and organs, including lung, liver, spleen and even the brain, has been documented in several studies. For instance, significant accumulation of PS MPs with a size of 5 µm has been shown in the guts of rats with an average residence time of about 17 days [136].
PS MNPs have also been shown to translocate to distant organs; Eyles et al. [137] demonstrated that such particles (0.87 μm) could move from the gastrointestinal tract to the stomach in rats, and subsequent research by Eyles et al. (2001) indicated that PS spheres (1.5 μm) could reach the liver and spleen in mice [138]. Notably, cylindrical MPs with diameters of 2.56 and 5.56 μm show higher deposition rates, whereas 1.6 μm cylindrical particles have lower deposition rates at a flow rate of 7.5 L/min. Spherical and tetrahedral MPs exhibit similar deposition rates at this flow rate. However, the overall deposition efficiency at 7.5 L/min is higher than at 30 L/min for all MNP sizes. This difference arises due to the longer residence time at lower flow rates, which affects the passage of MPs through the upper airway region. Factors such as gravitational sedimentation and Brownian diffusion are crucial, with Brownian diffusion being more significant at lower flow rates and decreasing as flow rates increase [139]. Human consumption of MPs is estimated to be 39,000–52,000 particles per year, potentially increasing to 74,000–121,000 particles per year when inhalation is included [77].

4.2.2. Pathophysiological Consequences of Microplastics Exposure

The primary focus of current research on MNPs’ potential consequences includes two main areas: the intrinsic toxicity of MNPs and the risks posed by their associated co-contaminants. Pristine MNPs have been shown to cause inflammation and cytotoxic effects [140,141]. Additionally, when plastic additives or surface-adsorbed pollutants are released into the human body, they may lead to more severe health outcomes. The interactions between MNPs and other pollutants are complex, influenced by the characteristics of the MNPs themselves and the environmental conditions, which can significantly impact their combined toxicity [117]. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the toxic effects of plastic particles and their co-contaminants, indicating a clear need for further investigation. Similarly, a study by Deng et al. found that exposure to pristine PS MPs (5 μm and 20 μm) in mice led to disruptions in energy and lipid metabolism, oxidative stress and neurotransmission, as well as inflammation in the liver [142]. Another in vitro study on human cerebral and epithelial cells showed that exposure to PS MPs (3–16 μm) at concentrations of 0.05–10 mg/L could lead to increased oxidative stress, a mechanism associated with cytotoxicity [140]. Additionally, positive-charged PS with a particle size of 60 nm was found to be highly toxic to macrophages as well as lung epithelial cells, inducing autophagic cell death [143]. Polyethylene (PE) MPs (10–45 μm) on the other hand did not cause cytotoxicity directly, but were found to induce genomic instability in human peripheral lymphocytes [144].
Apart from the intrinsic risks of pristine MNPs, the chemical additives incorporated during plastic production, along with environmental pollutants that can absorb these particles pose significant additional health risks. Common plastic additives include plasticizers, stabilizers, antioxidants, and flame-retardants, to name a few. Phthalate esters (PAEs), widely used as plasticizers to enhance the flexibility, durability, and stretchability of plastics, have already been detected in various organisms, suggesting potential release from MPs over time [142]. This was corroborated by the fact that mice can bioaccumulate PAEs in their gut and liver after being exposed to PAEs and MPs for 30 days [192]. The chemical effects of MPs can arise from several factors, including their composition, the leaching of unbound chemicals and residual monomers and the desorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs). Many HOCs are priority pollutants with established human health risks. The cellular uptake of MPs could, therefore, facilitate the entry of these contaminants into cells [193].

4.2.3. Types of Cancer Linked to Microplastic Particles and Associated Chemicals

The bio-persistence of MPs may trigger various biological responses such as inflammation, genotoxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis and necrosis [145,146]. Prolonged exposure to these conditions can result in tissue damage, fibrosis, and potentially lead to carcinogenesis (see [97] and references therein). Recent studies have highlighted the alarming link between chronic MP exposure and the development of various types of cancer [97].
  • Breast Cancer
Breast tissues are highly sensitive to steroid hormones such as estrogens, which play a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation in the mammary glands. BPA, a common component of MNPs, can mimic estrogen and has been shown to enhance the proliferation of mammary gland cells, increasing the risk of breast cancer [147]. BPA exposure has been linked to increased ductal density in mammary glands and the activation of oncogenic pathways, such as STAT3, PI3K/AKT and MAPK, which are known to contribute to tumor development [148]. Additionally, irregularly shaped polypropylene MPs have been found to alter the expression of genes related to the cell cycle in human breast cancer cell lines and to promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, further fueling cancer progression [149].
  • Lung Cancer
One of the primary routes for how MNPs can enter the human body is through inhalation, making the lungs particularly vulnerable [150]. Studies have identified various particles, including PE and PP, in human lung tissues, and these particles have been found to accumulate more frequently in the lungs of cancer patients compared to healthy individuals [4]. The inhalation of PS MPs has been shown to induce significant morphological changes and alter cell proliferation in lung epithelial cells [151]. Furthermore, BPA exposure has been implicated in the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are enzymes that facilitate cancer cell invasion and metastasis, thereby increasing the risk of lung cancer [152].
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), can develop from chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis, which may be exacerbated by MNP exposure. In this respect, particularly PS particles have been shown to induce oxidative stress and alter lipid metabolism in vitro in liver cells and organoids [153,154]. Studies have reported higher concentrations of MPs in cirrhotic liver tissues compared to healthy liver tissues, suggesting a role for MPs in liver fibrosis and cancer. Additionally, MNPs have been linked to the overexpression of hepatic enzymes like CYP2E1, which are associated with the progression of liver disease and the development of HCC [154,155].
  • Cervical Cancer
Cervical cancer is another malignancy that has been associated with plastic particle exposure, particularly due to the influence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals like BPA [156]. MNPs can trigger oxidative stress and alter the balance of antioxidants in cervical tissues, potentially leading to carcinogenesis. In vitro studies have shown that PS MNPs can invade cervical cancer cell lines, promoting cellular stress and inflammatory responses that may contribute to tumor development [157,159].
  • Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is hormonally driven, similar to breast cancer, and has been linked to environmental pollutants carried by MPs [158]. BPA and other endocrine disruptors found in MPs can interfere with androgen and estrogen receptors in the prostate, leading to abnormal cell growth and an increased risk of cancer [160,161]. Studies have shown that exposure to low doses of BPA can disrupt the normal development of prostate cells, increase the risk of neoplastic changes and contribute to the progression of prostate cancer [162,163,164].
  • Leukemia
Leukemia, a cancer of the blood-forming tissues, has also been connected to MP exposure [165]. MPs, particularly those made of PE and PS, can accumulate in the circulatory system, leading to hematotoxicity and disruptions in white blood cell counts [166]. BPA exposure has been shown to exacerbate the proliferation of leukemia cells and reduce the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatments, highlighting the potential role of MPs in the development and progression of blood cancers [167,168].
  • Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian cancer, often diagnosed at a late stage, may be influenced by exposure to MPs and their associated chemicals, such as BPA and phthalates. These chemicals can disrupt normal ovarian function, leading to altered hormone levels, irregular menstrual cycles and increased cancer risk. BPA exposure has been shown to upregulate genes involved in cell cycle progression and to activate signaling pathways that promote tumor growth in ovarian cells [169,170].
  • Colon Cancer
Colon cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide and has been linked to MNP exposure through ingestion. On the one hand, particles can disturb the gut microbiota, leading to inflammation and altered immune responses in the colon [171]. On the other hand, associated chemicals like BPA and phthalates found in MPs have been described to interfere with normal colon cell function, directly promoting carcinogenesis. Additionally, MP exposure has been associated with the downregulation of protective genes like Muc2, which is crucial for maintaining gut integrity and preventing early-onset colorectal cancer [172].

4.2.4. Microplastics and Cardiovascular Diseases

Oxidative stress and inflammation induced by MNP exposure can also impact cardiovascular health, potentially leading to an increased risk of conditions like hypertension, atherosclerosis and heart disease [173,174]. Studies have already described the detection of MNPs in cardiomyocytes, indicating a translocation route to the heart via the circulatory system [175]. Additionally, extensive apoptosis of myocardial tissue at doses of 5 and 50 mg/L of PS-MPs has been described. This was evidenced by elevated levels of myocardial creatine-kinase MB and cardiac troponin I, both critical markers of heart damage. Moreover, the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, triggered by oxidative stress, contributed to heart fibrosis and ultimately led to cardiac dysfunction [176].

4.2.5. Microplastics and the Nervous System

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a protective shield that helps prevent harmful substances in the bloodstream from entering brain tissue. It is composed of endothelial cells that are tightly joined by junctions that form a selective barrier, allowing only certain molecules to pass through. However, recent research has shown that MNPs can directly breach this barrier due to their size and/or geometry or via exosomal transport, raising concerns about their impact on neurological health [94,98,177]. Once MNPs enter the brain, they can cause alterations in tissue structure, damage to the blood–brain barrier and impaired neurological function. These effects may contribute to the onset of neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. A study observed behavioral changes in Daphnia fish after being fed 52 nm PS particles, noting alterations in activity levels and feeding time. However, these effects were size-dependent. Fish that received 180 nm particles displayed the fastest feeding rates and the highest activity levels. Additionally, MNP particles were found in all fish that had been fed PS, while no MNPs were detected in the brains of the control group [179]. In studies on mice, PS-MPs of varying diameters were detected in the brain following oral exposure. This exposure resulted in a disruption of the BBB, increased dendritic spine density and an inflammatory response in the hippocampus. Moreover, the mice displayed cognitive and memory deficits, which were found to be dependent on the concentration of the MPs rather than their size [180]. These findings are underscored by recent research on the influence of environmentally relevant levels of micro- and nanoplastics particles and their influence on ROS-dependent degeneration of human neurons and neurodegeneration in general during amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [180,181,182].

4.2.6. Microplastics and Reproductive Health—Fertility Issues

When MPs enter the bloodstream, they can be transported to reproductive organs, raising concerns about their potential impact on fertility. Especially, chemicals associated with plastic particles are known to be endocrine disruptors, which can interfere with hormonal functions and potentially compromise fertility by mimicking or blocking natural hormones in the body. Infertility rates and the number of couples facing unfulfilled desires to have children are steadily increasing [183]. Primary infertility is defined as the inability of a couple, after being in a relationship without using contraceptives for more than five years, to achieve a live birth. In contrast, secondary infertility refers to couples who have not had a live birth in the same time period, following a previous successful pregnancy. A cross-sectional study highlighted the rising prevalence of primary infertility in men, showing an increase from 287.1 ± 100.0 cases per 100,000 people in 1993 to 291.9 ± 111.9 in 2017 across Central and Eastern Europe, as well as Central Asia (slope 5.4). In women, the rates rose from 348.8 ± 115.9 to 347.3 ± 125.3 in the same regions (slope 3.0). The highest increase occurred in South Asia, where female infertility rates climbed from 798.4 ± 197.4 per 100,000 in 1993 to 960.4 ± 254.5 in 2017 (slope 40.9). For secondary infertility, the most significant increase was observed in North Africa and the Middle East, where rates rose from 1031.7 ± 329.4 per 100,000 people in 1993 to 1544.2 ± 451.3 in 2017 [184]. Despite the increasing prevalence of infertility, research exploring potential links between MNPs and reproductive health remains limited. However, emerging evidence suggests that such particles and their associated chemicals could have a significant impact on both male and female fertility, making this an area of growing concern.
  • Male Fertility
Studies reported that chronic as well as short-term oral exposure to MPs led to accumulation in testicular tissue causing testicular inflammation, blood–testis barrier disruption and impaired spermatogenesis. Jin et al. [185] discovered in a mouse model that the blood–testis barrier (BTB), found in the seminiferous epithelium and formed by a layer of Sertoli cells, plays a crucial role in supporting spermatogenesis. Mechanistically, MPs disrupt the organization of F-actin and lower the levels of tight junction proteins in the BTB [185]. Another mechanism describes a decrease in the BTB-associated proteins occluding, connecin-43 and N-cadherin resulting in a decline in sperm quantity and quality. This study, therefore, provides experimental support for the direct adverse effect of PS-MPs on male reproduction [186]. Another study, performed by Hou et al. [187], administered PS in drinking water to mice for 35 days. After the exposure to MP, the ratio of live sperm in the epididymis to the total number of sperm was significantly lower compared to not-exposed mice. Furthermore, the SPZ were morphologically analyzed. The germinal epithelium within the testis revealed cell damage, a reduced number of spermatids, detached cells from the germinal epithelium, pyknosis and nucleus rupture. Analysis of expression levels revealed increased levels of genes involved in inflammatory responses such as NFκBp65 and p-NF-κBp65, Interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) and decreased levels of critical transcriptional factors in the antioxidant defense system and related downstream target such as Nrf2 and HO-1 protein. An increased Bax-to-Bcl2 ratio and apoptosis were observed [187].
On the other hand, spermatozoa not only carry the genomic information of a haploid nucleus into the egg cell but also play a crucial role in early embryo development and the health of the offspring through their epigenetic signature. These epigenetic modifications are highly sensitive to environmental factors, such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals often associated with plastic particles [188]. In summary, although research in mammals is still limited, early findings suggest that MPs may pose a significant risk to male fertility.
  • Female Fertility
Several studies indicated that MNP exposure is highly correlated to reproductive problems in females. Oral PE administration (10–150 µm, 40 mg/kg/day) over a 30-day period resulted in DNA damage, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction in the oocytes of Kunming mice. These cellular injuries in germ cells were followed by reduced oocyte maturation, lower fertilization rates, and impaired embryonic development [189]. Furthermore, after 35 days of continuous exposure to PS-MPs, a reduction in the first polar body extrusion rate and a lower survival rate of superovulated oocytes were observed in the ovaries of mice. This study also led to indications of ovarian inflammation [190]. Another study showed decreased concentrations of 17β-estradiol (E2) and testosterone in the plasma of female Oryzias melastigma after sixty days of PS-MP exposure [191].

5. Microplastic Particles Do Not Disappear After the End of Biological Life

After death, tissue and cell degradation processes, along with environmental interactions, influence the fate of MNPs in human and animal bodies. Bacteria, enzymes and microorganisms promote organic degradation, but synthetic polymer particles are largely resistant to biodegradation. As organic matter decays, MNPs are gradually released into the environment, with the specific pathway depending on burial or cremation practices. In burial, MNPs may be transferred into the soil, potentially contaminating groundwater or being absorbed by plants and animals, re-entering the ecosystem. Due to their persistence, MNPs can remain in the environment long after complete decomposition, perpetuating cycles of pollution. It is generally accepted that incineration at high temperatures represents a way to permanently eliminate plastic waste. Nonetheless, during incineration, where typical temperatures range between 760 and 980 °C (1400–1800 °F), there are reports that MNPs may not fully combust and unburned material still exists in the bottom ash, i.e., the solid residue from such furnaces [194]. Unlike pyrolysis, which converts plastics into smaller compounds under oxygen-free conditions, cremation of deceased people using traditional wood pyres can therefore be expected to allow MNPs to be released into the atmosphere or remain in the ashes [195,196]. Therefore, MNPs will undoubtedly continue to persistent environmental contamination. The resistance of plastic particles from biological waste material to naturally degraded has far-reaching ecological consequences, including soil and water contamination, food chain disruption and potential human health affects via bioaccumulation. This underscores the urgency of reducing plastic consumption, improving waste management, and limiting the spread of MNPs. The life cycle of plastics does not end with death; their release during decomposition or cremation sustains environmental contamination, posing long-term risks to ecosystems and future generations.

6. Conclusions

MNPs represent an inescapable threat that begins as early as fetal development and continues throughout life, culminating in a return to the environment after death. The exposure of fetuses and infants to these particles is particularly alarming, given their vulnerability during critical stages of development. The accumulation of MPs in the human body, combined with their potential to cause chronic diseases and disrupt biological processes, underscores the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate this global threat. Despite the obvious problems, there are still limitations that restrict further action to reduce the risk of MP exposure. Firstly, the different detection methods and the data obtained with them make it difficult to carry out comparative studies quickly and to the extent necessary. The number of particles and their composition as well as the structure can lead to very different pathophysiological results in this context. Plastic has nowadays permeated all aspects of our lives, and it is practically no longer possible to reduce contact with MNPs in a simple way, let alone avoid it completely. Addressing MNP pollution requires, therefore, coordinated efforts to protect human health and ensure a safer environment for future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing, review, and editing, T.L., F.J., and C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

C.W. received financial support from the Medical Faculty of the Johannes Kepler University Linz through the internal funding program Impetus No. I-02-23.

Data Available Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was published with the support of the Open Access Publication Fund of the Johannes Kepler University Linz and the federal state Upper Austria.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sipe, J.M.; Bossa, N.; Berger, W.; von Windheim, N.; Gall, K.; Wiesner, M.R. From bottle to microplastics: Can we estimate how our plastic products are breaking down? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 152460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Frias, J.P.G.L.; Nash, R. Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 138, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vdovchenko, A.; Resmini, M. Mapping Microplastics in Humans: Analysis of Polymer Types, and Shapes in Food and Drinking Water-A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amato-Lourenço, L.F.; Carvalho-Oliveira, R.; Júnior, G.R.; Dos Santos Galvão, L.; Ando, R.A.; Mauad, T. Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schell, T.; Rico, A.; Vighi, M. Occurrence, Fate and Fluxes of Plastics and Microplastics in Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 250, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Besseling, E.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.; Foekema, E.M.; Koelmans, A.A. Quantifying ecological risks of aquatic micro- and nanoplastic. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 32–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mai, L.; Bao, L.-J.; Shi, L.; Wong, C.S.; Zeng, E.Y. A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11319–11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zarfl, C. Promising techniques and open challenges for microplastic identification and quantification in environmental matrices. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 3743–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andrady, A.L. The plastic in microplastics: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 119, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fendall, L.S.; Sewell, M.A. Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: Microplastics in facial cleansers. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 58, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Browne, M.A.; Galloway, T.; Thompson, R. Microplastic--an emerging contaminant of potential concern? Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2007, 3, 559–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, J.; Ma, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, F. Microbial degradation and other environmental aspects of microplastics/plastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Du, H.; Xie, Y.; Wang, J. Microplastic degradation methods and corresponding degradation mechanism: Research status and future perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arpia, A.A.; Chen, W.-H.; Ubando, A.T.; Naqvi, S.R.; Culaba, A.B. Microplastic degradation as a sustainable concurrent approach for producing biofuel and obliterating hazardous environmental effects: A state-of-the-art review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Toapanta, T.; Okoffo, E.D.; Ede, S.; O’Brien, S.; Burrows, S.D.; Ribeiro, F.; Gallen, M.; Colwell, J.; Whittaker, A.K.; Kaserzon, S.; et al. Influence of surface oxidation on the quantification of polypropylene microplastics by pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 796, 148835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kamweru, P.K.; Ndiritu, F.G.; Kinyanjui, T.K.; Muthui, Z.W.; Ngumbu, R.G.; Odhiambo, P.M. Study of Temperature and UV Wavelength Range Effects on Degradation of Photo-Irradiated Polyethylene Films Using DMA. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2011, 50, 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Delre, A.; Goudriaan, M.; Morales, V.H.; Vaksmaa, A.; Ndhlovu, R.T.; Baas, M.; Keijzer, E.; de Groot, T.; Zeghal, E.; Egger, M.; et al. Plastic photodegradation under simulated marine conditions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 187, 114544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, J.; Yan, D.; Fu, J.; Chen, Y.; Ou, H. Ultraviolet-C and vacuum ultraviolet inducing surface degradation of microplastics. Water Res. 2020, 186, 116360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cesa, F.S.; Turra, A.; Checon, H.H.; Leonardi, B.; Baruque-Ramos, J. Laundering and textile parameters influence fibers release in household washings. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 257, 113553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chubarenko, I.; Efimova, I.; Bagaeva, M.; Bagaev, A.; Isachenko, I. On mechanical fragmentation of single-use plastics in the sea swash zone with different types of bottom sediments: Insights from laboratory experiments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 150, 110726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ziani, K.; Ioniță-Mîndrican, C.-B.; Mititelu, M.; Neacșu, S.M.; Negrei, C.; Moroșan, E.; Drăgănescu, D.; Preda, O.-T. Microplastics: A Real Global Threat for Environment and Food Safety: A State of the Art Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hale, R.C.; Seeley, M.E.; La Guardia, M.J.; Mai, L.; Zeng, E.Y. A Global Perspective on Microplastics. JGR Ocean. 2020, 125, e2018JC014719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gruber, E.S.; Stadlbauer, V.; Pichler, V.; Resch-Fauster, K.; Todorovic, A.; Meisel, T.C.; Trawoeger, S.; Hollóczki, O.; Turner, S.D.; Wadsak, W.; et al. To Waste or Not to Waste: Questioning Potential Health Risks of Micro- and Nanoplastics with a Focus on Their Ingestion and Potential Carcinogenicity. Expo. Health 2023, 15, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ghosh, S.; Sinha, J.K.; Ghosh, S.; Vashisth, K.; Han, S.; Bhaskar, R. Microplastics as an Emerging Threat to the Global Environment and Human Health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Borrelle, S.B.; Ringma, J.; Law, K.L.; Monnahan, C.C.; Lebreton, L.; McGivern, A.; Murphy, E.; Jambeck, J.; Leonard, G.H.; Hilleary, M.A.; et al. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science 2020, 369, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. PlasticsEurope. Association of Plastics Manufacturers Plastics—The Facts 2017: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data; PlasticsEurope: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2015-Plastics-the-facts.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2024).
  28. Yu, Q.; Hu, X.; Yang, B.; Zhang, G.; Wang, J.; Ling, W. Distribution, abundance and risks of microplastics in the environment. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, G.S.; Liu, Y.F. The distribution of microplastics in soil aggregate fractions in southwestern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scheurer, M.; Bigalke, M. Microplastics in Swiss Floodplain Soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3591–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boots, B.; Russell, C.W.; Green, D.S. Effects of Microplastics in Soil Ecosystems: Above and Below Ground. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11496–11506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Li, W.; Jarvis, P.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Tan, Q.; Tian, Y. Occurrence, removal and potential threats associated with microplastics in drinking water sources. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zuccarello, P.; Ferrante, M.; Cristaldi, A.; Copat, C.; Grasso, A.; Sangregorio, D.; Fiore, M.; Oliveri Conti, G. Exposure to microplastics (<10 μm) associated to plastic bottles mineral water consumption: The first quantitative study. Water Res. 2019, 157, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Q.; Xu, E.G.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Ma, L.; Zeng, E.Y.; Shi, H. A Review of Microplastics in Table Salt, Drinking Water, and Air: Direct Human Exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3740–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meizoso-Regueira, T.; Fuentes, J.; Cusworth, S.J.; Rillig, M.C. Prediction of future microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 359, 124587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nelis, J.L.; Schacht, V.J.; Dawson, A.L.; Bose, U.; Tsagkaris, A.S.; Dvorakova, D.; Beale, D.J.; Can, A.; Elliott, C.T.; Thomas, K.V.; et al. The measurement of food safety and security risks associated with micro- and nanoplastic pollution. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 161, 116993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aardema, H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Kamstra, J.H.; Legler, J. Farm animals as a critical link between environmental and human health impacts of micro-and nanoplastics. Micropl. Nanopl. 2024, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Habib, R.Z.; Kindi, R.A.; Salem, F.A.; Kittaneh, W.F.; Poulose, V.; Iftikhar, S.H.; Mourad, A.-H.I.; Thiemann, T. Microplastic Contamination of Chicken Meat and Fish through Plastic Cutting Boards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 13442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Visentin, E.; Niero, G.; Benetti, F.; Perini, A.; Zanella, M.; Pozza, M.; de Marchi, M. Preliminary characterization of microplastics in beef hamburgers. Meat Sci. 2024, 217, 109626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Diaz-Basantes, M.F.; Conesa, J.A.; Fullana, A. Microplastics in Honey, Beer, Milk and Refreshments in Ecuador as Emerging Contaminants. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Visentin, E.; Manuelian, C.L.; Niero, G.; Benetti, F.; Perini, A.; Zanella, M.; Pozza, M.; de Marchi, M. Characterization of microplastics in skim-milk powders. J. Dairy. Sci. 2024, 107, 5393–5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zitko, V.; Hanlon, M. Another source of pollution by plastics: Skin cleaners with plastic scrubbers. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1991, 22, 41–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hopewell, J.; Dvorak, R.; Kosior, E. Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2115–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gregory, M.R. Plastic ‘scrubbers’ in hand cleansers: A further (and minor) source for marine pollution identified. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1996, 32, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pruter, A.T. Sources, quantities and distribution of persistent plastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1987, 18, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Williams, A.T.; Simmons, S.L. Estuarine Litter at the River/Beach Interface in the Bristol Channel, United Kingdom. J. Coast. Res. 1997, 13, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, R.C.; Olsen, Y.; Mitchell, R.P.; Davis, A.; Rowland, S.J.; John, A.W.G.; McGonigle, D.; Russell, A.E. Lost at sea: Where is all the plastic? Science 2004, 304, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhu, X.; Sun, C.; Teng, J.; Chen, L.; Shan, E.; Zhao, J. Microplastics in fish meals: An exposure route for aquaculture animals. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 151049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, J.-S.; Koongolla, J.B.; Li, H.-X.; Lin, L.; Pan, Y.-F.; Liu, S.; He, W.-H.; Maharana, D.; Xu, X.-R. Microplastic accumulation in fish from Zhanjiang mangrove wetland, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eriksson, C.; Burton, H. Origins and biological accumulation of small plastic particles in fur seals from Macquarie Island. Ambio 2003, 32, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Navarro, A.; Luzardo, O.P.; Gómez, M.; Acosta-Dacal, A.; Martínez, I.; La Felipe de Rosa, J.; Macías-Montes, A.; Suárez-Pérez, A.; Herrera, A. Microplastics ingestion and chemical pollutants in seabirds of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, J.-L.; Duan, Y.; Zhong, H.-N.; Lin, Q.-B.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, C.-C.; Chen, S.; Dong, B.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; et al. Analysis of microplastics released from plastic take-out food containers based on thermal properties and morphology study. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2023, 40, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, H.-P.; Huang, X.-H.; Chen, J.-N.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Qin, L. Pouring hot water through drip bags releases thousands of microplastics into coffee. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, H.; Xu, L.; Yu, K.; Wei, F.; Zhang, M. Release of microplastics from disposable cups in daily use. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shruti, V.C.; Kutralam-Muniasamy, G. Migration testing of microplastics in plastic food-contact materials: Release, characterization, pollution level, and influencing factors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 170, 117421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Jia, P.; He, S.; Dai, H.; Deng, S.; Han, J. Release of microplastics from breastmilk storage bags and assessment of intake by infants: A preliminary study. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 323, 121197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Savva, K.; Llorca, M.; Borrell, X.; Bertran-Solà, O.; Farré, M.; Moreno, T. Granulated rubber in playgrounds and sports fields: A potential source of atmospheric plastic-related contaminants and plastic additives after runoff events. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 479, 135697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fernandes, A.N.; Lara, L.Z.; de Falco, F.; Turner, A.; Thompson, R.C. Effect of the age of garments used under real-life conditions on microfibre release from polyester and cotton clothing. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 348, 123806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salthammer, T. Microplastics and their Additives in the Indoor Environment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202205713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amos, J.D.; Swarthout, R.F.; Turner, A.; Hendren, C.O. Bringing sex toys out of the dark: Exploring unmitigated risks. Micropl. Nanopl. 2023, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Munoz, L.P.; Baez, A.G.; Purchase, D.; Jones, H.; Garelick, H. Release of microplastic fibres and fragmentation to billions of nanoplastics from period products: Preliminary assessment of potential health implications. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 606–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E.; de Ruijter, V.N.; Mintenig, S.M.; Verschoor, A.; Koelmans, A.A. Ingestion and Chronic Effects of Car Tire Tread Particles on Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13986–13994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sieber, R.; Kawecki, D.; Nowack, B. Dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of rubber release from tires into the environment. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sommer, F.; Dietze, V.; Baum, A.; Sauer, J.; Gilge, S.; Maschowski, C.; Gieré, R. Tire Abrasion as a Major Source of Microplastics in the Environment. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2018, 18, 2014–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Siegfried, M.; Koelmans, A.A.; Besseling, E.; Kroeze, C. Export of microplastics from land to sea. A modelling approach. Water Res. 2017, 127, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ahrens, A. European Chemical Agency’s Perspective: An Evaluation of the Possible Health Risks of Recycle Rubber Granules used as Infill in Synthetic Turf Fields. ISEE Conf. Abstr. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Valente, M.; Sibai, A. Rubber/crete: Mechanical properties of scrap to reuse tire-derived rubber in concrete; A review. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2019, 17, 2280800019835486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wechselberger, C.; Messner, B.; Bernhard, D. The Role of Trace Elements in Cardiovascular Diseases. Toxics 2023, 11, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. López-Vázquez, J.; Miró, M.; Quintana, J.B.; Cela, R.; Ferriol, P.; Rodil, R. Bioaccessibility of plastic-related compounds from polymeric particles in marine settings: Are microplastics the principal vector of phthalate ester congeners and bisphenol A towards marine vertebrates? Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Campanale, C.; Massarelli, C.; Savino, I.; Locaputo, V.; Uricchio, V.F. A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Solleiro-Villavicencio, H.; Gomez-De León, C.T.; Del Río-Araiza, V.H.; Morales-Montor, J. The detrimental effect of microplastics on critical periods of development in the neuroendocrine system. Birth Defects Res. 2020, 112, 1326–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhu, L.; Kang, Y.; Ma, M.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Hu, R.; Xu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Gu, X.; An, L. Tissue accumulation of microplastics and potential health risks in human. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 915, 170004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ibrahim, Y.S.; Tuan Anuar, S.; Azmi, A.A.; Wan Mohd Khalik, W.M.A.; Lehata, S.; Hamzah, S.R.; Ismail, D.; Ma, Z.F.; Dzulkarnaen, A.; Zakaria, Z.; et al. Detection of microplastics in human colectomy specimens. JGH Open 2021, 5, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Horvatits, T.; Tamminga, M.; Liu, B.; Sebode, M.; Carambia, A.; Fischer, L.; Püschel, K.; Huber, S.; Fischer, E.K. Microplastics detected in cirrhotic liver tissue. EBioMedicine 2022, 82, 104147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Campen, M.; Nihart, A.; Garcia, M.; Liu, R.; Olewine, M.; Castillo, E.; Bleske, B.; Scott, J.; Howard, T.; Gonzalez-Estrella, J.; et al. Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains Assessed by Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dawson, A.L.; Kawaguchi, S.; King, C.K.; Townsend, K.A.; King, R.; Huston, W.M.; Bengtson Nash, S.M. Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Cox, K.D.; Covernton, G.A.; Davies, H.L.; Dower, J.F.; Juanes, F.; Dudas, S.E. Human Consumption of Microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7068–7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 60, 504–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Falakdin, P.; Lopez-Rosales, A.; Andrade, J.; Terzaghi, E.; Di Guardo, A.; Muniategui-Lorenzo, S. Comparison of microplastic type, size, and composition in atmospheric and foliage samples in an urban scenario. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 349, 123911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kau, D.; Materić, D.; Holzinger, R.; Baumann-Stanzer, K.; Schauer, G.; Kasper-Giebl, A. Fine micro- and nanoplastics concentrations in particulate matter samples from the high alpine site Sonnblick, Austria. Chemosphere 2024, 352, 141410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Materić, D.; Kjær, H.A.; Vallelonga, P.; Tison, J.-L.; Röckmann, T.; Holzinger, R. Nanoplastics measurements in Northern and Southern polar ice. Environ. Res. 2022, 208, 112741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gamage, S.; Mahagamage, Y. Microplastics in personal care products and cosmetics in Sri Lanka. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, H.; Zhu, M.; Nahid Pervez, M.; Wu, B.; Zhao, Y. Fabric structure and polymer composition as key contributors to micro(nano)plastic contamination in face masks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 476, 135089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Martin, L.; Simpson, K.; Brzezinski, M.; Watt, J.; Xu, W. Cellular response of keratinocytes to the entry and accumulation of nanoplastic particles. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wolff, C.M.; Singer, D.; Schmidt, A.; Bekeschus, S. Immune and inflammatory responses of human macrophages, dendritic cells, and T-cells in presence of micro- and nanoplastic of different types and sizes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ganhör, C.; Rezk, M.; Doppler, C.; Ruthmeier, T.; Wechselberger, C.; Müller, M.; Kotnik, M.; Puh, Š.; Messner, B.; Bernhard, D. Aluminum, a colorful gamechanger: Uptake of an aluminum-containing food color in human cells and its implications for human health. Food Chem. 2024, 442, 138404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Stock, V.; Böhmert, L.; Lisicki, E.; Block, R.; Cara-Carmona, J.; Pack, L.K.; Selb, R.; Lichtenstein, D.; Voss, L.; Henderson, C.J.; et al. Uptake and effects of orally ingested polystyrene microplastic particles in vitro and in vivo. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 1817–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wieland, S.; Ramsperger, A.F.R.M.; Gross, W.; Lehmann, M.; Witzmann, T.; Caspari, A.; Obst, M.; Gekle, S.; Auernhammer, G.K.; Fery, A.; et al. Nominally identical microplastic models differ greatly in their particle-cell interactions. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sabourian, P.; Yazdani, G.; Ashraf, S.S.; Frounchi, M.; Mashayekhan, S.; Kiani, S.; Kakkar, A. Effect of Physico-Chemical Properties of Nanoparticles on Their Intracellular Uptake. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Donahue, N.D.; Acar, H.; Wilhelm, S. Concepts of nanoparticle cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, and kinetics in nanomedicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 143, 68–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vácha, R.; Martinez-Veracoechea, F.J.; Frenkel, D. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles of various shapes. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5391–5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Toscano, F.; Torres-Arias, M. Nanoparticles cellular uptake, trafficking, activation, toxicity and in vitro evaluation. Curr. Res. Immunol. 2023, 4, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dasgupta, S.; Auth, T.; Gompper, G. Shape and orientation matter for the cellular uptake of nonspherical particles. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Augustine, R.; Hasan, A.; Primavera, R.; Wilson, R.J.; Thakor, A.S.; Kevadiya, B.D. Cellular uptake and retention of nanoparticles: Insights on particle properties and interaction with cellular components. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yameen, B.; Choi, W.I.; Vilos, C.; Swami, A.; Shi, J.; Farokhzad, O.C. Insight into nanoparticle cellular uptake and intracellular targeting. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Donkers, J.M.; Höppener, E.M.; Grigoriev, I.; Will, L.; Melgert, B.N.; van der Zaan, B.; van de Steeg, E.; Kooter, I.M. Advanced epithelial lung and gut barrier models demonstrate passage of microplastic particles. Micropl. Nanopl. 2022, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Goswami, S.; Adhikary, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Agarwal, R.; Ganguly, A.; Nanda, S.; Rajak, P. The alarming link between environmental microplastics and health hazards with special emphasis on cancer. Life Sci. 2024, 355, 122937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kim, N.; Park, J.H.; Lee, I.; Jung, G.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, M.J.; Im, W.; Cho, S.; Choi, Y.S. Investigation of Cell-to-cell Transfer of Polystyrene Microplastics Through Extracellular Vesicle-mediated Communication. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 734, 150719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Simon, B.H.; Ando, H.Y.; Gupta, P.K. Circulation time and body distribution of 14C-labeled amino-modified polystyrene nanoparticles in mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 1995, 84, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Arturson, P.; Laakso, T.; Edman, P. Acrylic microspheres in vivo IX: Blood elimination kinetics and organ distribution of microparticles with different surface characteristics. J. Pharm. Sci. 1983, 72, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Edman, P.; Sjöholm, I. Acrylic microspheres in vivo VIII: Distribution and elimination of polyacryldextran particles in mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 1983, 72, 796–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Illum, L.; Davis, S.S.; Müller, R.H.; Mak, E.; West, P. The organ distribution and circulation time of intravenously injected colloidal carriers sterically stabilized with a block copolymer--poloxamine 908. Life Sci. 1987, 40, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, L.; Xu, K.; Zhang, B.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, W. Cellular internalization and release of polystyrene microplastics and nanoplastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 779, 146523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Waterland, R.A.; Michels, K.B. Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2007, 27, 363–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ragusa, A.; Svelato, A.; Santacroce, C.; Catalano, P.; Notarstefano, V.; Carnevali, O.; Papa, F.; Rongioletti, M.C.A.; Baiocco, F.; Draghi, S.; et al. Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mahmud, F.; Sarker, D.B.; Jocelyn, J.A.; Sang, Q.-X.A. Molecular and Cellular Effects of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Focus on Inflammation and Senescence. Cells 2024, 13, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hu, M.; Palić, D. Micro- and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory adverse outcome pathways. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jia, R.; Han, J.; Liu, X.; Li, K.; Lai, W.; Bian, L.; Yan, J.; Xi, Z. Exposure to Polypropylene Microplastics via Oral Ingestion Induces Colonic Apoptosis and Intestinal Barrier Damage through Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Mice. Toxics 2023, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Waterland, R.A.; Jirtle, R.L. Transposable elements: Targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 5293–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Godfrey, K.M.; Barker, D.J. Fetal programming and adult health. Public. Health Nutr. 2001, 4, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Grafmueller, S.; Manser, P.; Diener, L.; Diener, P.-A.; Maeder-Althaus, X.; Maurizi, L.; Jochum, W.; Krug, H.F.; Buerki-Thurnherr, T.; von Mandach, U.; et al. Bidirectional Transfer Study of Polystyrene Nanoparticles across the Placental Barrier in an ex Vivo Human Placental Perfusion Model. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Syme, M.R.; Paxton, J.W.; Keelan, J.A. Drug transfer and metabolism by the human placenta. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2004, 43, 487–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wick, P.; Malek, A.; Manser, P.; Meili, D.; Maeder-Althaus, X.; Diener, L.; Diener, P.-A.; Zisch, A.; Krug, H.F.; Mandach, U. von. Barrier capacity of human placenta for nanosized materials. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tian, F.; Razansky, D.; Estrada, G.G.; Semmler-Behnke, M.; Beyerle, A.; Kreyling, W.; Ntziachristos, V.; Stoeger, T. Surface modification and size dependence in particle translocation during early embryonic development. Inhal. Toxicol. 2009, 21 (Suppl. S1), 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Fournier, S.B.; D’Errico, J.N.; Adler, D.S.; Kollontzi, S.; Goedken, M.J.; Fabris, L.; Yurkow, E.J.; Stapleton, P.A. Nanopolystyrene translocation and fetal deposition after acute lung exposure during late-stage pregnancy. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2020, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sarkar, D.J.; Das Sarkar, S.; Das, B.K.; Sahoo, B.K.; Das, A.; Nag, S.K.; Manna, R.K.; Behera, B.K.; Samanta, S. Occurrence, fate and removal of microplastics as heavy metal vector in natural wastewater treatment wetland system. Water Res. 2021, 192, 116853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, T.; Wang, L.; Chen, Q.; Kalogerakis, N.; Ji, R.; Ma, Y. Interactions between microplastics and organic pollutants: Effects on toxicity, bioaccumulation, degradation, and transport. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 142427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Armstrong, B.; Hutchinson, E.; Unwin, J.; Fletcher, T. Lung cancer risk after exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review and meta-analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Li, D.; Shi, Y.; Yang, L.; Xiao, L.; Kehoe, D.K.; Gun’ko, Y.K.; Boland, J.J.; Wang, J.J. Microplastic release from the degradation of polypropylene feeding bottles during infant formula preparation. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ali, M.; Jaghbir, M.; Salam, M.; Al-Kadamany, G.; Damsees, R.; Al-Rawashdeh, N. Testing baby bottles for the presence of residual and migrated bisphenol A. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 191, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, S.; Guo, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, R.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, B.; Dong, R. Detection of various microplastics in placentas, meconium, infant feces, breastmilk and infant formula: A pilot prospective study. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Prata, J.C.; Da Costa, J.P.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abbasi, S.; Keshavarzi, B.; Moore, F.; Turner, A.; Kelly, F.J.; Dominguez, A.O.; Jaafarzadeh, N. Distribution and potential health impacts of microplastics and microrubbers in air and street dusts from Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Mendonca, K.; Hauser, R.; Calafat, A.M.; Arbuckle, T.E.; Duty, S.M. Bisphenol A concentrations in maternal breast milk and infant urine. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2014, 87, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Celeiro, M.; Armada, D.; Dagnac, T.; de Boer, J.; Llompart, M. Hazardous compounds in recreational and urban recycled surfaces made from crumb rubber. Compliance with current regulation and future perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Turner, A.; Scott, J.W.; Green, L.A. Rare earth elements in plastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Just, A.C.; Miller, R.L.; Perzanowski, M.S.; Rundle, A.G.; Chen, Q.; Jung, K.H.; Hoepner, L.; Camann, D.E.; Calafat, A.M.; Perera, F.P.; et al. Vinyl flooring in the home is associated with children’s airborne butylbenzyl phthalate and urinary metabolite concentrations. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vicente-Martínez, Y.; Caravaca, M.; Soto-Meca, A. Determination of Very Low Concentration of Bisphenol A in Toys and Baby Pacifiers Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction by In Situ Ionic Liquid Formation and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xu, Z.; Shen, J.; Lin, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Deng, X.; Wu, X.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, R.; et al. Exposure to irregular microplastic shed from baby bottles activates the ROS/NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway, causing intestinal inflammation. Environ. Int. 2023, 181, 108296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dietert, R.R. Developmental immunotoxicology: Focus on health risks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Q.; Bai, J.; Ning, B.; Fan, L.; Sun, T.; Fang, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, S.; Duan, C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Effects of bisphenol A and nanoscale and microscale polystyrene plastic exposure on particle uptake and toxicity in human Caco-2 cells. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Murawski, A.; Lange, R.; Lemke, N.; Zimmermann, P.; Peisker, J.; Rucic, E.; Hahn, D.; Dębiakund, M.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Ergebnisbericht—Deutsche Umweltstudie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen 2014-2017 (GerES V): Teil 1: Human-Biomonitoring; Umweltbundesamt: Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, 2023; Available online: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-949390 (accessed on 15 November 2024).
  133. Dodds, E.C.; Lawson, W. Synthetic strogenic Agents without the Phenanthrene Nucleus. Nature 1936, 137, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Soto, A.M.; Sonnenschein, C. Environmental causes of cancer: Endocrine disruptors as carcinogens. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2010, 6, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Segovia-Mendoza, M.; Nava-Castro, K.E.; Palacios-Arreola, M.I.; Garay-Canales, C.; Morales-Montor, J. How microplastic components influence the immune system and impact on children health: Focus on cancer. Birth Defects Res. 2020, 112, 1341–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yang, Y.-F.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lu, T.-H.; Liao, C.-M. Toxicity-based toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic assessment for bioaccumulation of polystyrene microplastics in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Eyles, J.; Alpar, O.; Field, W.N.; Lewis, D.A.; Keswick, M. The transfer of polystyrene microspheres from the gastrointestinal tract to the circulation after oral administration in the rat. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1995, 47, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Eyles, J.E.; Bramwell, V.W.; Williamson, E.D.; Alpar, H.O. Microsphere translocation and immunopotentiation in systemic tissues following intranasal administration. Vaccine 2001, 19, 4732–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Islam, M.S.; Rahman, M.M.; Larpruenrudee, P.; Arsalanloo, A.; Beni, H.M.; Islam, M.A.; Gu, Y.; Sauret, E. How microplastics are transported and deposited in realistic upper airways? Phys. Fluids 2023, 35, 063319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Schirinzi, G.F.; Pérez-Pomeda, I.; Sanchís, J.; Rossini, C.; Farré, M.; Barceló, D. Cytotoxic effects of commonly used nanomaterials and microplastics on cerebral and epithelial human cells. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lemos, B.; Ren, H. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mackintosh, C.E.; Maldonado, J.; Hongwu, J.; Hoover, N.; Chong, A.; Ikonomou, M.G.; Gobas, F.A.P.C. Distribution of phthalate esters in a marine aquatic food web: Comparison to polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 2011–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chiu, H.-W.; Xia, T.; Lee, Y.-H.; Chen, C.-W.; Tsai, J.-C.; Wang, Y.-J. Cationic polystyrene nanospheres induce autophagic cell death through the induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Çobanoğlu, H.; Belivermiş, M.; Sıkdokur, E.; Kılıç, Ö.; Çayır, A. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of polyethylene microplastics on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Brynzak-Schreiber, E.; Schögl, E.; Bapp, C.; Cseh, K.; Kopatz, V.; Jakupec, M.A.; Weber, A.; Lange, T.; Toca-Herrera, J.L.; Del Favero, G.; et al. Microplastics role in cell migration and distribution during cancer cell division. Chemosphere 2024, 353, 141463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Casella, C.; Ballaz, S.J. Genotoxic and neurotoxic potential of intracellular nanoplastics: A review. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2024, 44, 1657–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Tian, J.-M.; Ran, B.; Zhang, C.-L.; Yan, D.-M.; Li, X.-H. Estrogen and progesterone promote breast cancer cell proliferation by inducing cyclin G1 expression. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2018, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Dumitrascu, M.C.; Mares, C.; Petca, R.-C.; Sandru, F.; Popescu, R.-I.; Mehedintu, C.; Petca, A. Carcinogenic effects of bisphenol A in breast and ovarian cancers. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 20, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Park, J.H.; Hong, S.; Kim, O.-H.; Kim, C.-H.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.-W.; Hong, S.; Lee, H.J. Polypropylene microplastics promote metastatic features in human breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, Q.; Gao, J.; Yu, H.; Su, H.; Yang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, Y.; Hollert, H.; Shi, H.; et al. An emerging role of microplastics in the etiology of lung ground glass nodules. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022, 34, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Goodman, K.E.; Hare, J.T.; Khamis, Z.I.; Hua, T.; Sang, Q.-X.A. Exposure of Human Lung Cells to Polystyrene Microplastics Significantly Retards Cell Proliferation and Triggers Morphological Changes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 1069–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Qu, J.; Mao, W.; Liao, K.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, H. Association between urinary bisphenol analogue concentrations and lung cancer in adults: A case-control study. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 315, 120323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. He, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Miao, X.; Li, G.; He, Q.; Xu, H.; Li, H.; Wei, Y. Cytotoxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface functionalization on human HepG2 cells. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 138180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Cheng, W.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y. Polystyrene microplastics induce hepatotoxicity and disrupt lipid metabolism in the liver organoids. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Fröhlich, E.; Kueznik, T.; Samberger, C.; Roblegg, E.; Wrighton, C.; Pieber, T.R. Size-dependent effects of nanoparticles on the activity of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 242, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Shrivastava, A.; Mishra, S.P.; Pradhan, S.; Choudhary, S.; Singla, S.; Zahra, K.; Aggarwal, L.M. An assessment of serum oxidative stress and antioxidant parameters in patients undergoing treatment for cervical cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 167, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Medellín-Garibay, S.E.; Alcántara-Quintana, L.E.; Rodríguez-Báez, A.S.; Sagahón-Azúa, J.; Rodríguez-Aguilar, M.; Hernández Cueto, M.d.L.A.; Muñoz Medina, J.E.; Del Milán-Segovia, R.C.; Flores-Ramírez, R. Urinary phthalate metabolite and BPA concentrations in women with cervical cancer. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 21033–21042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Dobbs, R.W.; Malhotra, N.R.; Greenwald, D.T.; Wang, A.Y.; Prins, G.S.; Abern, M.R. Estrogens and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019, 22, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Wei, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Tao, L. Cytotoxicity study of polyethylene glycol derivatives. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 18252–18259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Prins, G.S.; Tang, W.-Y.; Belmonte, J.; Ho, S.-M. Perinatal exposure to oestradiol and bisphenol A alters the prostate epigenome and increases susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Basic. Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008, 102, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Huang, D.; Wu, J.; Su, X.; Yan, H.; Sun, Z. Effects of low dose of bisphenol A on the proliferation and mechanism of primary cultured prostate epithelial cells in rodents. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 2635–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Tarapore, P.; Ying, J.; Ouyang, B.; Burke, B.; Bracken, B.; Ho, S.-M. Exposure to bisphenol A correlates with early-onset prostate cancer and promotes centrosome amplification and anchorage-independent growth in vitro. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ho, S.-M.; Tang, W.-Y.; Belmonte de Frausto, J.; Prins, G.S. Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol A increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 5624–5632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Prins, G.S.; Hu, W.-Y.; Xie, L.; Shi, G.-B.; Hu, D.-P.; Birch, L.; Bosland, M.C. Evaluation of Bisphenol A (BPA) Exposures on Prostate Stem Cell Homeostasis and Prostate Cancer Risk in the NCTR-Sprague-Dawley Rat: An NIEHS/FDA CLARITY-BPA Consortium Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2018, 126, 117001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Leslie, H.A.; van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Sun, R.; Xu, K.; Yu, L.; Pu, Y.; Xiong, F.; He, Y.; Huang, Q.; Tang, M.; Chen, M.; Yin, L.; et al. Preliminary study on impacts of polystyrene microplastics on the hematological system and gene expression in bone marrow cells of mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 218, 112296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Fan, J.; Wu, X. Bisphenol A triggers the malignancy of acute myeloid leukemia cells via regulation of IL-4 and IL-6. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2020, 34, e22412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Chen, Y.-K.; Tan, Y.-Y.; Yao, M.; Lin, H.-C.; Tsai, M.-H.; Li, Y.-Y.; Hsu, Y.-J.; Huang, T.-T.; Chang, C.-W.; Cheng, C.-M.; et al. Bisphenol A-induced DNA damages promote to lymphoma progression in human lymphoblastoid cells through aberrant CTNNB1 signaling pathway. iScience 2021, 24, 102888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Crews, D.; McLachlan, J.A. Epigenetics, evolution, endocrine disruption, health, and disease. Endocrinology 2006, 147, S4–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shafei, A.; Ramzy, M.M.; Hegazy, A.I.; Husseny, A.K.; El-Hadary, U.G.; Taha, M.M.; Mosa, A.A. The molecular mechanisms of action of the endocrine disrupting chemical bisphenol A in the development of cancer. Gene 2018, 647, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chen, W.; Zheng, X.; Yan, F.; Xu, L.; Ye, X. Modulation of Gut Microbial Metabolism by Cyanidin-3- O -Glucoside in Mitigating Polystyrene-Induced Colonic Inflammation: Insights from 16S rRNA Sequencing and Metabolomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 7140–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Velcich, A.; Yang, W.; Heyer, J.; Fragale, A.; Nicholas, C.; Viani, S.; Kucherlapati, R.; Lipkin, M.; Yang, K.; Augenlicht, L. Colorectal cancer in mice genetically deficient in the mucin Muc2. Science 2002, 295, 1726–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pan, Y.; Xu, S.; Yang, X. Standardizing methodologies to study microplastics and nanoplastics in cardiovascular diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Li, J.; Weng, H.; Liu, S.; Li, F.; Xu, K.; Wen, S.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Nie, Y.; Liao, B.; et al. Embryonic exposure of polystyrene nanoplastics affects cardiac development. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhou, N.; Chen, Y.; Ling, Z.; Xiang, P. Microplastics in the human body: A comprehensive review of exposure, distribution, migration mechanisms, and toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Li, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Q.; Wei, J.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Polystyrene microplastics cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 115025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Kaushik, A.; Singh, A.; Kumar Gupta, V.; Mishra, Y.K. Nano/micro-plastic, an invisible threat getting into the brain. Chemosphere 2024, 361, 142380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mattsson, K.; Johnson, E.V.; Malmendal, A.; Linse, S.; Hansson, L.-A.; Cedervall, T. Brain damage and behavioural disorders in fish induced by plastic nanoparticles delivered through the food chain. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jin, H.; Yang, C.; Jiang, C.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Ding, J. Evaluation of Neurotoxicity in BALB/c Mice following Chronic Exposure to Polystyrene Microplastics. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 107002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Vojnits, K.; de León, A.; Rathore, H.; Liao, S.; Zhao, M.; Gibon, J.; Pakpour, S. ROS-dependent degeneration of human neurons induced by environmentally relevant levels of micro- and nanoplastics of diverse shapes and forms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 469, 134017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Eisen, A.; Pioro, E.P.; Goutman, S.A.; Kiernan, M.C. Nanoplastics and Neurodegeneration in ALS. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Sun, H.; Yang, B.; Li, Q.; Zhu, X.; Song, E.; Liu, C.; Song, Y.; Jiang, G. Polystyrene nanoparticles trigger aberrant condensation of TDP-43 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-like symptoms. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2024, 19, 1354–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wang, M.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M. The hidden threat: Unraveling the impact of microplastics on reproductive health. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 935, 173177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Borumandnia, N.; Alavi Majd, H.; Khadembashi, N.; Alaii, H. Worldwide trend analysis of primary and secondary infertility rates over past decades: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2022, 20, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Jin, H.; Ma, T.; Sha, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, X.; Ding, J. Polystyrene microplastics induced male reproductive toxicity in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Li, S.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.; Xu, N.; Wang, N.; Lei, Z.; Hou, J.; Jin, Y.; et al. Polystyrene microplastics induce blood-testis barrier disruption regulated by the MAPK-Nrf2 signaling pathway in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 47921–47931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Hou, B.; Wang, F.; Liu, T.; Wang, Z. Reproductive toxicity of polystyrene microplastics: In vivo experimental study on testicular toxicity in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Chianese, R.; Troisi, J.; Richards, S.; Scafuro, M.; Fasano, S.; Guida, M.; Pierantoni, R.; Meccariello, R. Bisphenol A in Reproduction: Epigenetic Effects. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 748–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, T.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Yu, R.; Liu, J.; Su, J. Reproductive toxicity of microplastics in female mice and their offspring from induction of oxidative stress. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 327, 121482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Liu, Z.; Zhuan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Meng, L.; Fu, X.; Hou, Y. Polystyrene microplastics induced female reproductive toxicity in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, X.; Tian, H.; Wang, W.; Ru, S. Polystyrene microplastics cause tissue damages, sex-specific reproductive disruption and transgenerational effects in marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma). Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Deng, Y.; Yan, Z.; Shen, R.; Huang, Y.; Ren, H.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced reproductive toxicities induced by phthalates contaminated microplastics in male mice (Mus musculus). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Khan, F.R.; Syberg, K.; Shashoua, Y.; Bury, N.R. Influence of polyethylene microplastic beads on the uptake and localization of silver in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Pollut. 2015, 206, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yang, Z.; Lü, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Shao, L.; Ye, J.; He, P. Is incineration the terminator of plastics and microplastics? J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Maafa, I.M. Pyrolysis of Polystyrene Waste: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Yermán, L.; Wall, H.; Carrascal, J.; Browning, A.; Chandraratne, D.; Nguyen, C.; Wong, A.; Goode, T.; Kyriacou, D.; Campbell, M.; et al. Experimental study on the fuel requirements for the thermal degradation of bodies by means of open pyre cremation. Fire Saf. J. 2018, 98, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Accumulation of MPs in different tissues. (Created in BioRender. Lang, T. (2024) https://BioRender.com/w89g368, accessed on 17 November 2024).
Figure 1. Accumulation of MPs in different tissues. (Created in BioRender. Lang, T. (2024) https://BioRender.com/w89g368, accessed on 17 November 2024).
Environments 11 00263 g001
Figure 2. Microplastics uptake during different stages of human development. (Created in BioRender. Lang, T. (2024) https://BioRender.com/d17c062, accessed on 15 November 2024).
Figure 2. Microplastics uptake during different stages of human development. (Created in BioRender. Lang, T. (2024) https://BioRender.com/d17c062, accessed on 15 November 2024).
Environments 11 00263 g002
Table 1. Summary of different degradation processes for plastic materials.
Table 1. Summary of different degradation processes for plastic materials.
Degradation ProcessMechanismKey Factors InvolvedResulting ChangesRef.
BIOTICBiodegradationEnzymatic breakdownMicroorganisms
(fungal, multiple bacteria, algae)
Enzymatic oxidation,
hydrolysis,
chain scission,
polymer fragmentation
[12,13]
ABIOTIC DEGRADATIONChemical degradationChemical reactions catalyzed by environmental agentsHydrolysis, oxidation, solubilizationOxidation,
dehydrochlorination,
chain scission,
cross-linking,
polymer fragmentation
[13]
Thermal degradationSlow thermal oxidation in combination with photodegradationThermal oxidation[11,14,15,16]
Photo-degradationExposure to UV radiationUV radiation, oxygen, temperature[13,17,18]
Mechanical degradationPhysical forcesAbrasion, friction, pressureAblation, particle fragmentation[19,20]
Table 2. Routes of exposure during the neonatal stage. (Abbreviations: PP, Polypropylene; PC, Polycarbonate; BPA, Bisphenol A; TDI, Tolerable daily intake; PE, Polyethylene; PU, Polyurethane; PA, Polyacrylamide; PS, Polystyrene; MPs, Microplastic particles; MNPs, Micro-/Nanoplastic particles; PAH, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; BBzP, Butyl benzyl phthalate; DEHP, Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate).
Table 2. Routes of exposure during the neonatal stage. (Abbreviations: PP, Polypropylene; PC, Polycarbonate; BPA, Bisphenol A; TDI, Tolerable daily intake; PE, Polyethylene; PU, Polyurethane; PA, Polyacrylamide; PS, Polystyrene; MPs, Microplastic particles; MNPs, Micro-/Nanoplastic particles; PAH, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; BBzP, Butyl benzyl phthalate; DEHP, Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate).
SourceChemicalAmountDetection viaRef.
Baby bottlesPP14,600–4,550,000 particles per person per day
Or
16.2 million particles per liter
especially after heating in microwave
Water incubated in baby bottles[119]
PC/BPA0.8 to 23.8% of their safe TDI of BPA by using plastic bottlesEthanol/water mixture in baby bottles [120]
Baby formulaPP, PENot specifiedFormula preparations in plastic bottles[119]
mostly PU17.3 particles/gInfant formula[121]
Household dust → crawling/hand-to-mouth activitiesPA, PS20–60 particles/m3Indoor air sampling[122]
Environmental dustn.a.15 MPs per day via inhalation Street dust[123]
Toysn.a.By friction, heat or light, MNPs may be released directly onto the hands, mouths and noses of children [34]
BreastmilkVarious, mostly PU 20.2 particles/gBreastmilk[121]
BreastmilkBPA75% of breastmilk samples
0.4–1.4 µg/L
Breastmilk[124]
Diverse sourcesVarious, mostly PA 18.0 particles/gPlacenta[121]
Football pitches and playgroundsPAH, phthalates, adipates9–91 µg/gRubber samples [125]
Children’s toysBromine and antimony Toy Samples[126]
Vinyl FlooringBBzP, DEHP23.9 ng/m3 BBzP in air samples (compared to 10.6 ng/m3)Indoor Air Sample[127]
Pacifiers
Toys
BPABelow LOD—0.33 µg/L11 Toy and Pacifier Samples[128]
Table 3. Composition of plastic particles detected in infants. (Abbreviations: PA, Polyacrylamide; MPs, Microplastic particles; BPA, Bisphenol A; MbzP, Monobenzyl phthalate).
Table 3. Composition of plastic particles detected in infants. (Abbreviations: PA, Polyacrylamide; MPs, Microplastic particles; BPA, Bisphenol A; MbzP, Monobenzyl phthalate).
ChemicalAmountDetection viaRef.
Various, mostly PA 54.1 particles/gMeconium[121]
Various, mostly PA 26.6 particles/g
Correlation of exposure to plastic toys
Infant feces[121]
MPs with 11 out of 15 plastic ingredients traced 1.2–3.3 µg/L
In 93% of urine samples
Children (age 3–17) urine and blood samples[132]
BPA1.2–4.4 μg/LInfant urine (3–15 months) without known BPA exposure[124]
MBzP32.6 ng/mL Urinary MBzP
(compared to 18.3 ng/mL)
Urine metabolites from children living in homes with vinyl flooring[127]
Table 4. Distribution and consequences of plastic particle accumulation in different tissues.
Table 4. Distribution and consequences of plastic particle accumulation in different tissues.
CategoryAffected
Organs/Tissues
Key FindingsRef.
Accumulation in tissuesLung, spleen, liver, brain, intestine, etc.Significant accumulation documented in animal studies; translocation to distant organs observed[72,73,74,97,137,138,139]
Pathophysiology/toxicity and inflammationVarious tissuesInduces oxidative stress, inflammation and cytotoxicity; exacerbated by additives like BPA[140,141,142,143,144]
Carcinogenic potentialBreast, lung, liver, cervical, prostate, colon, bloodChronic exposure linked to cancer risk via inflammation and genotoxicity[97,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172]
Cardiovascular systemHeartAccumulation leads to oxidative stress, heart fibrosis and heart damage[173,174,175,176]
Nervous system BrainLeads to neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits[94,98,177,178,179,180,181,182]
Reproductive healthTestes, ovariesDNA damage, reduced fertility rates and impaired sperm and oocyte quality[183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lang, T.; Jelić, F.; Wechselberger, C. From Cradle to Grave: Microplastics—A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations. Environments 2024, 11, 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263

AMA Style

Lang T, Jelić F, Wechselberger C. From Cradle to Grave: Microplastics—A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations. Environments. 2024; 11(12):263. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lang, Tamara, Filip Jelić, and Christian Wechselberger. 2024. "From Cradle to Grave: Microplastics—A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations" Environments 11, no. 12: 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263

APA Style

Lang, T., Jelić, F., & Wechselberger, C. (2024). From Cradle to Grave: Microplastics—A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations. Environments, 11(12), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop