Next Article in Journal
Through the Kinesthetic Lens: Observation of Social Attunement in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
Universal Connection through Art: Role of Mirror Neurons in Art Production and Reception
Previous Article in Journal
Cancer Communication and Family Caregiver Quality of Life
Article

Neuropsychology of Aesthetic Judgment of Ambiguous and Non-Ambiguous Artworks

1
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia of Rome, 00179 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, L’Aquila University, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: D. W. Zaidel
Behav. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010013
Received: 16 December 2016 / Revised: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published: 18 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroscience of Art)
Several affective and cognitive processes have been found to be pivotal in affecting aesthetic experience of artworks and both neuropsychological as well as psychiatric symptoms have been found to affect artistic production. However, there is a paucity of studies directly investigating effects of brain lesions on aesthetic judgment. Here, we assessed the effects of unilateral brain damage on aesthetic judgment of artworks showing part/whole ambiguity. We asked 19 unilaterally brain-damaged patients (10 left and 9 right brain damaged patients, respectively LBDP and RBDP) and 20 age- and education-matched healthy individuals (controls, C) to rate 10 Arcimboldo’s ambiguous portraits (AP), 10 realistic Renaissance portraits (RP), 10 still life paintings (SL), and 10 Arcimboldo’s modified portraits where only objects/parts are detectable (AO). They were also administered a Navon task, a facial recognition test, and evaluated on visuo-perceptual and visuo-constructional abilities. Patients included in the study did not show any deficits that could affect the capability to explore and enjoy artworks. SL and RP was not affected by brain damage regardless of its laterality. On the other hand, we found that RBDP liked AP more than the C participants. Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between aesthetic judgment of AP and visuo-perceptual skills even if the single case analyses failed to find a systematic association between neuropsychological deficits and aesthetic judgment of AP. On the whole, the present data suggest that a right hemisphere lesion may affect aesthetic judgment of ambiguous artworks, even in the absence of exploration or constructional deficits. View Full-Text
Keywords: artists; art and brain; neuroaesthetics; brain damage; brain lesion artists; art and brain; neuroaesthetics; brain damage; brain lesion
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Boccia, M.; Barbetti, S.; Piccardi, L.; Guariglia, C.; Giannini, A.M. Neuropsychology of Aesthetic Judgment of Ambiguous and Non-Ambiguous Artworks. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010013

AMA Style

Boccia M, Barbetti S, Piccardi L, Guariglia C, Giannini AM. Neuropsychology of Aesthetic Judgment of Ambiguous and Non-Ambiguous Artworks. Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 7(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boccia, Maddalena; Barbetti, Sonia; Piccardi, Laura; Guariglia, Cecilia; Giannini, Anna M. 2017. "Neuropsychology of Aesthetic Judgment of Ambiguous and Non-Ambiguous Artworks" Behav. Sci. 7, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010013

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop