Next Article in Journal
Teachers’ SEL Identity (SEL-ID): An Intersection Between Teacher Identity and Social and Emotional Learning (SEL)
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Addressing Overweight and Obesity in Children and Adolescents with Mental Illness: A Scoping Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Depression on Defense Mechanisms in Adults: The Moderating Role of Attachment Style

by
Andra-Iuliana Tanase
1,
Amelia-Damiana Trifu
2,* and
Simona Trifu
3
1
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of General Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010057
Submission received: 18 October 2025 / Revised: 16 December 2025 / Accepted: 18 December 2025 / Published: 29 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Psychiatric, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders)

Abstract

Depressive disorders are strongly influenced by personality organization, attachment style, and defensive functioning. This study examined the associations between depression severity, defense mechanisms, and adult attachment styles, and explored potential moderating effects of gender. A community sample completed standardized measures assessing depressive symptoms, defense mechanisms (mature, neurotic, immature), and attachment dimensions (anxious, avoidant). Correlational and regression analyses indicated that higher depressive severity was negatively associated with denial and dissociation, while no significant links emerged for projection or mature defenses. Anxious attachment predicted greater use of projection (B = 4.65, p = 0.040), but depression did not moderate this association. Cluster analysis identified two distinct profiles: one with moderate depression and higher denial, and another with severe depression and markedly lower denial. Men reported higher dysfunctional defenses overall, whereas a significant depression × gender interaction suggested that depressive severity was associated with reduced dysfunctional defenses among women (B = −0.58, p = 0.002). These findings challenge prevailing evidence that depressive severity correlates with greater immature defense use, instead suggesting a possible defensive collapse at high symptom levels. The study contributes novel insights into how attachment and gender shape defensive functioning in depression, emphasizing the need for longitudinal and clinical replication.
Keywords: depression and defense mechanisms; attachment styles and depression; defensive functioning in mental health; gender differences in defense mechanisms; psychodynamic factors in depression depression and defense mechanisms; attachment styles and depression; defensive functioning in mental health; gender differences in defense mechanisms; psychodynamic factors in depression

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanase, A.-I.; Trifu, A.-D.; Trifu, S. The Impact of Depression on Defense Mechanisms in Adults: The Moderating Role of Attachment Style. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010057

AMA Style

Tanase A-I, Trifu A-D, Trifu S. The Impact of Depression on Defense Mechanisms in Adults: The Moderating Role of Attachment Style. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanase, Andra-Iuliana, Amelia-Damiana Trifu, and Simona Trifu. 2026. "The Impact of Depression on Defense Mechanisms in Adults: The Moderating Role of Attachment Style" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010057

APA Style

Tanase, A.-I., Trifu, A.-D., & Trifu, S. (2026). The Impact of Depression on Defense Mechanisms in Adults: The Moderating Role of Attachment Style. Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop