Next Article in Journal
Migrant-Led Community Organisations: Mobilising Ethnic Capital to Support Refugees and Asylum Seekers in England
Previous Article in Journal
Technology Empowers Emotions: How AR Technology Triggers Consumers’ Purchase and Spread Behavior Towards Intangible Cultural Heritage Brands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Psychometrics of Drawmetrics: An Expressive–Semantic Framework for Personality Assessment

1
Biostatistics and Psychometrics, Joe & Teresa Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
2
AttituX Ltd., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010135 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 November 2025 / Revised: 12 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 17 January 2026

Abstract

This study examines whether Drawmetrics (DM), an expressive–semantic personality system, can be linked with the Five-Factor Model (Big Five) through an embedding-based mapping approach and network psychometric methods. A total of 185 participants completed both the DM assessment and the IPIP-NEO 120 Big Five inventory. DM term outputs were embedded using a miniLM sentence-transformer and aggregated into 30 facet composites, with six composites per domain. Big Five facet composites were extracted from standardized reports and harmonized to canonical facet names. Analyses focused on the overlap sample (N = 148) with valid scores on both instruments. DM composites demonstrated strong internal structure and high stability indices. Substantial semantic-space alignment was observed between DM term language and Big Five facet language, supporting interpretable linking. However, person-level correlations between DM and Big Five domains were modest (mean |r| ≈ 0.07; Spearman similar), with the largest facet-level association at |r| ≈ 0.26. DM appears to represent a coherent expressive–semantic trait space that is related to, but not isomorphic with, Big Five traits. These findings support a linking rather than equivalence interpretation and highlight the need for future research on scaling, reliability, range restriction, and criterion validation.
Keywords: Drawmetrics; Five-Factor Model; semantic linking; trait mapping; sentence transformers; network psychometrics Drawmetrics; Five-Factor Model; semantic linking; trait mapping; sentence transformers; network psychometrics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Price, L.R. Psychometrics of Drawmetrics: An Expressive–Semantic Framework for Personality Assessment. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010135

AMA Style

Price LR. Psychometrics of Drawmetrics: An Expressive–Semantic Framework for Personality Assessment. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(1):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Price, Larry R. 2026. "Psychometrics of Drawmetrics: An Expressive–Semantic Framework for Personality Assessment" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 1: 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010135

APA Style

Price, L. R. (2026). Psychometrics of Drawmetrics: An Expressive–Semantic Framework for Personality Assessment. Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop