Understanding COVID-19-Related Behaviors, Worries, and Attitudes among Chinese: Roles of Personality and Severity
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Personality and COVID-19-Related Responses
1.2. Situational Factors and COVID-19 Related Responses
1.3. The Current Study
2. Method
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measures
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. The Severity of COVID-19 and One’s Responses
4.2. HEXACO Personality Traits and COVID-19 Related Responses
4.3. Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- WHO. COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 28 March 2021).
- Cheng, C.; Barceló, J.; Hartnett, A.S.; Kubinec, R.; Messerschmidt, L. COVID-19 government response event dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0). Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020, 4, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leung, N.H.L.; Chu, D.K.W.; Shiu, E.Y.C.; Chan, K.-H.; McDevitt, J.J.; Hau, B.J.P.; Yen, H.-L.; Li, Y.; Ip, D.K.M.; Peiris, J.S.M.; et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moritz, U.G.; Kraemer, M.U.G.; Yang, C.-H.; Gutierrez, B.; Wu, C.-H.; Klein, B.; Pigott, D.M.; Covid, O.; Hanage, W.P.; Brownstein, J.S.; et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science 2020, 368, 493–497. [Google Scholar]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T. Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Aschwanden, D.; Strickhouser, J.E.; Sesker, A.A.; Lee, J.H.; Luchetti, M.; Stephan, Y.; Sutin, A.R.; Terracciano, A. Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease: The role of personality. Eur. J. Pers. 2021, 35, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbe, L.; Rau, R.; Toppe, T. Influence of perceived threat of COVID-19 and HEXACO personality traits on toilet paper stockpiling. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zettler, I.; Schild, C.; Lilleholt, L.; Kroencke, L.; Utesch, T.; Moshagen, M.; Böhm, R.; Back, M.D.; Geukes, K. The role of personality in COVID-19-related perceptions, evaluations, and behaviors: Findings across five samples, nine traits, and 17 criteria. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2022, 13, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shook, N.; Sevi, B.; Lee, J.; Fitzgerald, H.N.; Oosterhoff, B. Who’s listening? Predictors of concern about COVID-19 and preventative health behaviors. PsyArXiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barceló, J.; Sheen, G.C.H. Voluntary adoption of social welfare-enhancing behavior: Mask-wearing in Spain during the COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dammeyer, J. An explorative study of the individual differences associated with consumer stockpiling during the early stages of the 2020 Coronavirus outbreak in Europe. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2020, 167, 110263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Columbus, S. Who hoards? Honesty-Humility and behavioural responses to the 2019/20 Coronavirus pandemic. PsyArXiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, M.H.; Gustafson, A.; Maibach, E.W.; Ballew, M.T.; Bergquist, P.; Kotcher, J.E.; Marlon, J.R.; Rosenthal, S.A.; Leiserowitz, A. Mask-wearing increased after a government recommendation: A natural experiment in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Commun. 2020, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Lyu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Luo, J. The influence of COVID-19 on well-being. PsyArXiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romer, D.; Jamieson, K.H. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020, 263, 113356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, L.C.; Soveri, A.; Lewandowsky, S.; Karlsson, L.; Karlsson, H.; Nolvi, S.; Karukivi, M.; Lindfelt, M.; Antfolk, J. Fearing the disease or the vaccine: The case of COVID-19. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2021, 172, 110590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malik, A.A.; McFadden, S.M.; Elharake, J.; Omer, S.B. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 26, 100495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewin, K. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers; Harper: New York, NY, USA, 1951. [Google Scholar]
- Bowers, K.S. Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychol. Rev. 1973, 80, 307–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleeson, W.; Noftle, E.E. In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. J. Res. Pers. 2009, 43, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherman, R.A.; Rauthmann, J.F.; Brown, N.A.; Serfass, D.G.; Jones, A.B. The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 109, 872–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, J.K.; Alleaume, C.; Peretti-watel, P.; the COCONEL Group. The French public’s attitudes to a future COVID-19 vaccine: The politicization of a public health issue. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020, 265, 113414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassenrath, C.; Diefenbacher, S.; Siegel, A.; Keller, J. A person-oriented approach to hand hygiene behaviour: Emotional empathy fosters hand hygiene practice. Psychol. Health 2016, 31, 205–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfattheicher, S.; Nockur, L.; Böhm, R.; Sassenrath, C.; Petersen, M.B. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 31, 1363–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fishbein, H.D. Peer Prejudice and Discrimination: The Origins of Prejudice, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- He, J.; He, L.; Zhou, W.; Nie, X.; He, M. Discrimination and social exclusion in the outbreak of COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17, 2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Branovački, B.; Sadiković, S.; Smederevac, S.; Mitrović, D.; Pajić, D. A person-centered approach in studying coronavirus pandemic response: The role of HEXACO-PI-R and PANAS dimensions. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2021, 171, 110536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, E.; Villar, P.; López-Romero, L. Assessing six factors in Spain: Validation of the HEXACO-100 in relation to the Five Factor Model and other conceptually relevant criteria. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2015, 76, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sibley, C.G.; Harding, J.F.; Perry, R.; Asbrock, F.; Duckitt, J. Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. Eur. J. Personality 2010, 24, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, R.E. The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). J. Res. Pers. 2013, 47, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagotto, L.; Voci, A. Direct and mass-mediated contact: The role of different intergroup emotions. TPM-Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 20, 365–381. [Google Scholar]
- Bouton, R.A.; Gallaher, P.E.; Garlinghouse, P.A.; Leal, T.; Rosenstein, L.D.; Young, R.K. Scales for measuring fear of AIDS and homophobia. J. Pers. Asses. 1987, 51, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soto, C.J. How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The life outcomes of personality replication project. Psychol. Sci. 2019, 30, 711–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zettler, I.; Thielmann, I.; Hilbig, B.E.; Moshagen, M. The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 15, 723–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mischel, W. The interaction of person and situation. In Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology; Magnusson, D., Endler, N.S., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1977; pp. 333–352. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss, H.M.; Adler, S. Personality and organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 1984, 6, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Levin, A.T.; Hanage, W.P.; Owusu-Boaitey, N.; Cochran, K.B.; Walsh, S.P.; Meyerowitz-Katz, G. Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 35, 1123–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhanot, D.; Singh, T.; Verma, S.K.; Sharad, S. Stigma and discrimination during COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Public Health 2021, 8, 577018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Triandis, H.C.; Brislin, R.; Hui, C.H. Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 1988, 12, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thielmann, I.; Spadaro, G.; Balliet, D. Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2020, 146, 30–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pletzer, J.L.; Bentvelzen, M.; Oostrom, J.K.; de Vries, R.E. A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019, 112, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilbig, B.E.; Zettler, I. When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior. J. Res. Pers. 2015, 57, 72–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soto, C.J.; John, O.P. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2017, 113, 117–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sutin, A.R.; Stephan, Y.; Luchetti, M.; Artese, A.; Oshio, A.; Terracciano, A. The five-factor model of personality and physical inactivity: A meta-analysis of 16 samples. J. Res. Pers. 2016, 63, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakulinen, C.; Hintsanen, M.; Munafò, M.R.; Virtanen, M.; Kivimäki, M.; Batty, G.D.; Jokela, M. Personality and smoking: Individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies. Addiction 2015, 110, 1844–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molloy, G.J.; O’Carroll, R.E.; Ferguson, E. Conscientiousness and medication adherence: A meta-analysis. Ann. Behav. Med. 2014, 47, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mroczek, D.K.; Almeida, D.M. The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. J. Pers. 2004, 72, 355–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K.; de Vries, R.E. The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2014, 18, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K.; Paunonen, S.V. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 83, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Ludeke, S.; Haubrich, J.; Gondan-Rochon, M.; Zettler, I. Similar to and/or better than oneself? Singles’ ideal partner personality descriptions. Eur. J. Personal. 2018, 32, 443–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Ashton, M.C. Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2005, 38, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Book, A.; Visser, B.; Blais, J.; Hosker-Field, A.; Methot-Jones, T.; Gauthier, N.; Volk, A.; Holden, R.; D’Agata, M. Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Pers. Individ. Dif. 2016, 90, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rammstedt, B.; John, O.P. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers. 2007, 41, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler, M.; Kemper, C.J.; Kruyen, P. Short scales—Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. J. Individ. Dif. 2014, 35, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | M (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Honesty-Humility | 3.83 (0.69) | 0.43 | |||||||||||||
2. Emotionality | 3.44 (0.63) | 0.05 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
3. Extraversion | 3.62 (0.71) | −0.05 | −0.05 | 0.50 | |||||||||||
4. Agreeableness | 3.10 (0.62) | 0.23 ** | −0.11 ** | −0.01 | 0.20 | ||||||||||
5. Conscientiousness | 3.66 (0.74) | 0.13 ** | −0.14 ** | 0.12 ** | 0.08 * | 0.59 | |||||||||
6. Openness to Experience | 3.62 (0.66) | −0.15 ** | −0.02 | 0.20 ** | −0.01 | 0.11 ** | 0.34 | ||||||||
7. Mask Wearing | 6.69 (0.82) | 0.13 ** | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.08 * | 0.14 ** | 0.03 | - | |||||||
8. Hoarding | 4.03 (1.89) | −0.04 | 0.08 * | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.14 ** | - | ||||||
9. Infect | 4.21 (1.17) | −0.03 | 0.18 ** | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.13 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.64 | |||||
10. Spread | 6.26 (1.07) | 0.12 ** | 0.07 * | 0.08 * | 0.10 ** | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.20 ** | 0.12 ** | 0.31 ** | 0.59 | ||||
11. Discrimination | 2.50 (1.11) | −0.05 | 0.08 * | 0.02 | −0.14 ** | 0.09 ** | −0.09 ** | 0.02 | 0.13 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.06 | 0.69 | |||
12. Empathy | 5.72 (1.15) | 0.17 ** | 0.08 * | 0.14 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.12 ** | 0.08 * | 0.24 ** | 0.22 ** | 0.23 ** | 0.31 ** | −0.01 | 0.58 | ||
13. Severity | 5.51 (1.01) | 0.01 | 0.05 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | −0.03 | 0.18 ** | 0.20 ** | 0.44 ** | 0.28 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.26 ** | 0.65 | |
14. Age | 30.79 (10.46) | 0.23 ** | −0.11 ** | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.16 ** | −0.13 ** | 0.01 | −0.09 ** | −0.05 | −0.02 | 0.19 ** | 0.12 ** | 0.04 | - |
15. Gender | 1.76 (0.43) | 0.15 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.05 | 0.05 | −0.09 ** | −0.06 | 0.08 * | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.07 * | 0.04 | −0.04 | −0.05 |
Variables | Behaviors | Worries | Attitudes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mask Wearing | Hoarding | Infect | Spread | Discrimination | Empathy | ||||||||
ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ||
Step 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 ** | 0 | 0 | 0.04 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.02 ** | ||||||
Age | 0.01 | −0.16 ** | −0.05 | −0.02 | 0.08 * | 0.12 ** | |||||||
Gender | 0.07 * | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||||||||
Step 2 | 0.03 ** | 0.01 | 0.03 ** | 0.04 ** | 0.05 ** | 0.07 ** | |||||||
Honesty-Humility | 0.09 ** | −0.09 | −0.04 | 0.11 ** | −0.11 ** | 0.12 ** | |||||||
Emotionality | 0 | 0.13 * | 0.18 ** | 0.08 * | 0.08 * | 0.12 ** | |||||||
Extraversion | 0.03 | −0.05 | −0.01 | 0.08 * | 0.02 | 0.12 ** | |||||||
Agreeableness | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.09 * | −0.12 ** | 0.14 ** | |||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.10 ** | 0.10 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.11 ** | 0.07 * | |||||||
Openness to Experience | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0 | −0.10 ** | 0.08 * | |||||||
Step 3 | 0.03 ** | 0.04 ** | 0.20 ** | 0.07 ** | 0.01 ** | 0.07 ** | |||||||
Severity | 0.15 ** | 0.37 ** | 0.44 ** | 0.28 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.25 ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, J.; Cao, C.; Zhang, Y. Understanding COVID-19-Related Behaviors, Worries, and Attitudes among Chinese: Roles of Personality and Severity. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060482
Liu J, Cao C, Zhang Y. Understanding COVID-19-Related Behaviors, Worries, and Attitudes among Chinese: Roles of Personality and Severity. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(6):482. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060482
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Jie, Chun Cao, and Yanyan Zhang. 2024. "Understanding COVID-19-Related Behaviors, Worries, and Attitudes among Chinese: Roles of Personality and Severity" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 6: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060482
APA StyleLiu, J., Cao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Understanding COVID-19-Related Behaviors, Worries, and Attitudes among Chinese: Roles of Personality and Severity. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060482