How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. User-Generated Content
2.2. Uses and Gratification Theory
2.3. Para-Social Relationships
2.4. Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) Framework
2.5. Purchase Intention and Purchase Behavior
3. Research Methodology
4. Qualitative Design and Data Analysis (Phase 1)
4.1. Qualitative Data Collection
4.2. Qualitative Data Analysis
5. Quantitative Design and Data Analysis (Phase 2)
5.1. Development of Research Models Based on the Literature and Qualitative Study
5.2. Hypotheses Development
5.3. Ethical Considerations
5.4. Measurement
5.5. Quantitative Data Collection
5.6. Data Analysis
5.6.1. Measurement Model Assessment
5.6.2. Structural Model Assessment
6. Discussion
6.1. Qualitative Research
6.2. Quantitative Research
7. Conclusions
7.1. Theoretical Contributions
7.2. Practical Implications
7.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Saadeh, H.; Al Fayez, R.Q.; Al Refaei, A.; Shewaikani, N.; Khawaldah, H.; Abu-Shanab, S.; Al-Hussaini, M. Smartphone Use Among University Students During COVID-19 Quarantine: An Ethical Trigger. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 600134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, H.G. A Study on Cooking Video Users’ Purchasing Behavior in UGC Platform: The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy for Cooking. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2021, 27, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
- Carter, M.; Egliston, B. The Work of Watching Twitch: Audience Labour in Livestreaming and Esports. J. Gaming Virtual Worlds 2021, 13, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babenskaite, G.; Yang, M. Mukbang Influencers: Online Eating Becomes a New Marketing Strategy: A Case Study of Small Sized Firms in China’s Food Industry 2019. Master’s Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Choe, H. Eating Together Multimodally: Collaborative Eating in Mukbang, a Korean Livestream of Eating. Lang. Soc. 2019, 48, 171–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y. Eating as a Transgression: Multisensorial Performativity in the Carnal Videos of Mukbang (Eating Shows). Int. J. Cult. Stud. 2021, 24, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.W.; Sung, H.J.; Jeon, H.M. Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, H.; Quan, M.-Y.; Liu, H.-C.; Duan, C.-Y. A Novel Integrated Approach for Green Supplier Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Information: A Case Study in the Agri-Food Industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Collart, A.; Interis, M. Consumer Imperfect Information in the Market for Expired and Nearly Expired Foods and Implications for Reducing Food Waste. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, H.; Ko, E.; Kim, J. SNS Users’ Para-Social Relationships with Celebrities: Social Media Effects on Purchase Intentions. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2015, 25, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y. The Influence of Media Multitasking on the Impulse to Buy: A Moderated Mediation Model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 70, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; ISBN 0262130904. [Google Scholar]
- Rauniar, R.; Rawski, G.; Yang, J.; Johnson, B. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Social Media Usage: An Empirical Study on Facebook. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2014, 27, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thong, J.Y.L.; Hong, S.-J.; Tam, K.Y. The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gogan, I.C.W.; Zhang, Z.; Matemba, E.D. Impacts of Gratifications on Consumers’ Emotions and Continuance Use Intention: An Empirical Study of Weibo in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Halliday, S.V. User-Generated Content about Brands: Understanding Its Creators and Consumers. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, J.; Ko, E. UGC Attributes and Effects: Implication for Luxury Brand Advertising. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 40, 945–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubowicz, K. New Media Ecology: Reconceptualizing Media Pluralism. In Media Pluralism and Diversity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 23–53. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, Y.; Liu, R.; Li, Q.; Leischow, S.J.; Zeng, D.D. Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study from Multiple Social Media Platforms. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vu, H.Q.; Luo, J.M.; Ye, B.H.; Li, G.; Law, R. Evaluating Museum Visitor Experiences Based on User-Generated Travel Photos. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pintér, D.G. Media Bias and the Role of User Generated Contents in Crisis Management: A Case-Study about the Communication of the Hungarian Police Forces after 2016 Budapest Explosion. Corvinus J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2018, 9, 101–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, K. Domesticating Cuisine: Food and Aesthetics on American Television. Gastronomica 2007, 7, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolova, K.; Perez, C. You Follow Fitness Influencers on YouTube. But Do You Actually Exercise? How Parasocial Relationships, and Watching Fitness Influencers, Relate to Intentions to Exercise. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruggiero, T.E. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Commun. Soc. 2000, 3, 3–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katz, E.; Haas, H.; Gurevitch, M. On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1973, 38, 164–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rubin, A.M. An Examination of Television Viewing Motivations. Commun. Res. 1981, 8, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kania, D.; Agatha, N. Online Consumers and the Application of Uses and Gratification Theory Case Study: The Kaskus Website. J. Commun. Spectr. Capturing New Perspect. Commun. 2012, 1, 91–108. [Google Scholar]
- Finn, S.; Gorr, M.B. Social Isolation and Social Support as Correlates of Television Viewing Motivations. Commun. Res. 1988, 15, 135–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, H.; Kumar, A. Variations in Consumers’ Use of Brand Online Social Networking: A Uses and Gratifications Approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horton, D.; Richard Wohl, R. Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry 1956, 19, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dibble, J.L.; Hartmann, T.; Rosaen, S.F. Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship: Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures. Hum. Commun. Res. 2016, 42, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubin, R.B.; McHugh, M.P. Development of Parasocial Interaction Relationships. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 1987, 31, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiggins, S.; Potter, J.; Wildsmith, A. Eating Your Words: Discursive Psychology and the Reconstruction of Eating Practices. J. Health Psychol. 2001, 6, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kircaburun, K.; Harris, A.; Calado, F.; Griffiths, M.D. The Psychology of Mukbang Watching: A Scoping Review of the Academic and Non-Academic Literature. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2021, 19, 1190–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Greenwood, D.N.; Pietromonaco, P.R.; Long, C.R. Young Women’s Attachment Style and Interpersonal Engagement with Female TV Stars. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2008, 25, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.-L. How Vloggers Embrace Their Viewers: Focusing on the Roles of Para-Social Interactions and Flow Experience. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 49, 101364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurtin, K.S.; O’Brien, N.; Roy, D.; Dam, L. The Development of Parasocial Interaction Relationships on YouTube. J. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 7, 233–252. [Google Scholar]
- Purwanto, P. # I envy, therefore, I buy!#: The role of celebgram trustworthiness and para-social interactions in consumer purchase intention. J. Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan 2021, 23, 186–196. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.-L.; Lu, H.-P. Why Do People Play On-Line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 853–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewei, T.; Youngsook, L. Factors Affecting Continuous Purchase Intention of Fashion Products on Social E-Commerce: SOR Model and the Mediating Effect. Entertain. Comput. 2022, 41, 100474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parboteeah, D.V.; Valacich, J.S.; Wells, J.D. The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer’s Urge to Buy Impulsively. Inf. Syst. Res. 2009, 20, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Song, M.; Yang, G.; Cheng, S.; Li, M. RETRACTED: Stimulus Organism Response Model Based Analysis on Consumers’ Online Impulse Buying Behavior. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petcharat, T.; Leelasantitham, A. A Retentive Consumer Behavior Assessment Model of the Online Purchase Decision-Making Process. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puengwattanapong, P.; Leelasantitham, A. A Holistic Perspective Model of Plenary Online Consumer Behaviors for Sustainable Guidelines of the Electronic Business Platforms. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Benyoucef, M. The Effects of Social Commerce Design on Consumer Purchase Decision-Making: An Empirical Study. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2017, 25, 40–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Bala, H. Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. MIS Q. 2013, 37, 21–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alase, A. The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 2017, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Creswell, J.W.; Hanson, W.E.; Clark Plano, V.L.; Morales, A. Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation. Couns. Psychol. 2007, 35, 236–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auerbach, C.; Silverstein, L.B. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis; NYU Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Volume 21, ISBN 0814707416. [Google Scholar]
- Corbin, J.; Strauss, A. Analytic Ordering for Theoretical Purposes. Qual. Inq. 1996, 2, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y. Designing Qualitative Research. Organ. Manag. J. 2011, 8, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; Law, R. “Do We Believe in TripAdvisor?” Examining Credibility Perceptions and Online Travelers’ Attitude toward Using User-Generated Content. J. Travel. Res. 2013, 52, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.E.; Watkins, B. YouTube Vloggers’ Influence on Consumer Luxury Brand Perceptions and Intentions. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5753–5760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-W.; Chan, H.C.; Gupta, S. Value-Based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An Empirical Investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 43, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.S.; Ma, L. News Sharing in Social Media: The Effect of Gratifications and Prior Experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, B.; Sung, B.; Lee, S. I like Watching Other People Eat: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Antecedents of Attitudes towards Mukbang. Australas. Mark. J. AMJ 2019, 27, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, W.B.; Monroe, K.B.; Grewal, D. Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. J. Mark. Res. 1991, 28, 307–319. [Google Scholar]
- Seaman, W.R. Active Audience Theory: Pointless Populism. Media Cult. Soc. 1992, 14, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.V.; Liu, S. Presenting an Ideal Self on Weibo: The Effects of Narcissism and Self-Presentation Valence on Uses and Gratifications. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mehrad, J.; Tajer, P. Uses and Gratification Theory in Connection with Knowledge and Information Science: A Proposed Conceptual Model. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Manag. IJISM 2016, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, G. Understanding the Appeal of User-generated Media: A Uses and Gratification Perspective. Internet Res. 2009, 19, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.A.; Kim, M.; Jahan, N. Can “Liking” Behavior Lead to Usage Intention on Facebook? Uses and Gratification Theory Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, B.-K.; Kim, K.-O. Relationship between Viewing Motivation, Presence, Viewing Satisfaction, and Attitude toward Tourism Destinations Based on TV Travel Reality Variety Programs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X. A Study on the Influence of the Internet Personal Broadcasting ‘Mukbang’ Viewing on Real Life. Master’s Thesis, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, M.R.; Dahl, D.W.; White, K.; Zaichkowsky, J.L.; Polegato, R. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being; Pearson: London, UK, 2014; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. 2002. Available online: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2023).
- Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; Sun, J.; Bilgihan, A.; Okumus, F. An Investigation on Online Reviews in Sharing Economy Driven Hospitality Platforms: A Viewpoint of Trust. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korgaonkar, P.K.; Wolin, L.D. A Multivariate Analysis of Web Usage. J. Advert. Res. 1999, 39, 53. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.-Q.; Chen, H.-G. Social Media and Human Need Satisfaction: Implications for Social Media Marketing. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, Q. Research on the Impact of Media Credibility on Risk Perception of COVID-19 and the Sustainable Travel Intention of Chinese Residents Based on an Extended TPB Model in the Post-Pandemic Context. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Chen, L.; Wei, L.; Su, Q. Personal and Media Factors Related to Citizens’ pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention against Haze in China: A Moderating Analysis of TPB. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sokolova, K.; Kefi, H. Instagram and YouTube Bloggers Promote It, Why Should I Buy? How Credibility and Parasocial Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najar, A.H.; Hamid Rather, A. Mediating Role of Guest’s Attitude toward the Impact of UGC Benefits on Purchase Intention of Restaurants; Extending Social Action and Control Theories. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2021, 24, 249–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallud, J.; Straub, D.W. Effective Website Design for Experience-Influenced Environments: The Case of High Culture Museums. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castaneda, J.A.; Munoz-Leiva, F.; Luque, T. Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating Effects of User Experience. Inf. Manag. 2007, 44, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mir, I.A.; Ur Rehman, K. Factors Affecting Consumer Attitudes and Intentions toward User-Generated Product Content on YouTube. Manag. Mark. 2013, 8, 637. [Google Scholar]
- Levy, Y. An Empirical Development of Critical Value Factors (CVF) of Online Learning Activities: An Application of Activity Theory and Cognitive Value Theory. Comput. Educ. 2008, 51, 1664–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faubion, C.W. Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 2001, 45, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferdousi, B.; Levy, Y. Development and Validation of a Model to Investigate the Impact of Individual Factors on Instructors’ Intention to Use E-Learning Systems. Interdiscip. J. E-Learn. Learn. Objects 2010, 6, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Mena, J.A. An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Plann. 2013, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Hair, J.F. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handb. Mark. Res. 2017, 26, 587–632. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Page, M.; Brunsveld, N. Essentials of Business Research Methods, 4th ed.; Routledge: Milton, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. In Advanced Methods for Modeling Markets; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 361–381. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to Use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M.; Bonett, D.G. Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.S. A Study on the Effect of View Motives on the View Satisfaction and Behavior Intentions of One-Person Media Food Contents: Focused on ‘Mokbang’and ‘Cookbang. ’ Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2019, 25, 102–112. [Google Scholar]
- Jang, Y.; Kim, M. Need for Interaction or Pursuit of Information and Entertainment? The Relationship among Viewing Motivation, Presence, Parasocial Interaction, and Satisfaction of Eating and Cooking Broadcasts. Korean J. Broadcast. Telecommun. Stud. 2016, 30, 152–185. [Google Scholar]
- Fitriani, W.R.; Mulyono, A.B.; Hidayanto, A.N.; Munajat, Q. Reviewer’s Communication Style in YouTube Product-Review Videos: Does It Affect Channel Loyalty? Heliyon 2020, 6, e04880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.-L.; Shon, Z.Y. Exploring Airline Passengers’ Willingness to Pay for Carbon Offsets. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2012, 17, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janavi, E.; Soleimani, M.; Gholampour, A.; Friedrichsen, M.; Ebrahimi, P. Effect of Social Media Adoption and Media Needs on Online Purchase Behavior: The Moderator Roles of Media Type, Gender, Age. J. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 13, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Woodside, A.G.; Wilson, E.J. Applying the Long Interview in Direct Marketing Research. J. Direct Mark. 1995, 9, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1985; ISBN 0803924313. [Google Scholar]
Construct | Item | Loadings | α (1) | C.R (2) | AVE (3) | Items’ Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude toward mukbangs | I feel good watching mukbang content. | 0.877 | 0.919 | 0.943 | 0.805 | [52] |
I like watching mukbang content on YouTube. | 0.908 | |||||
It is wise to watch mukbang content on YouTube. | 0.909 | |||||
It is worthwhile watching mukbang content on YouTube. | 0.895 | |||||
Attractiveness | I find that the mukbang YouTuber is attractive. | 0.915 | 0.815 | 0.890 | 0.729 | [53] |
I think the mukbang YouTuber is quite enticing. | 0.888 | |||||
The mukbang YouTuber is charming. | 0.889 | |||||
Enjoyment | I have fun with mukbang. | 0.864 | 0.907 | 0.935 | 0.782 | [54] |
Watching mukbang provides me with a lot of enjoyment. | 0.836 | |||||
I enjoy watching mukbang. | 0.929 | |||||
Watching mukbang makes me excited. | 0.906 | |||||
Exposure | Mukbang is good for spending time alone. | 0.915 | 0.880 | 0.926 | 0.806 | [23] |
I watch mukbang habitually without a special purpose. | 0.888 | |||||
There are no other programs to watch at the time this program is broadcast. | 0.889 | |||||
Information | Mukbang helps me to store useful information about food. | 0.867 | 0.920 | 0.943 | 0.806 | [55] |
Mukbang is good to retrieve information about food when I need it. | 0.913 | |||||
To keep up to date on the latest news and events about food, mukbang is useful. | 0.919 | |||||
Mukbang is useful for finding useful information about food. | 0.892 | |||||
Intention to watch mukbangs | I intend to watch mukbang frequently. | 0.924 | 0.919 | 0.949 | 0.860 | [56] |
I plan to watch mukbang more often. | 0.938 | |||||
My willingness to watch mukbang is high. | - | |||||
The probability that I would consider buying an F&B product that I saw in a video is high. | 0.920 | |||||
Para-social relationships | The mukbang influencer makes me feel comfortable, as if I was with a friend. | 0.920 | 0.919 | 0.949 | 0.860 | [23] |
I look forward to watching the last video uploaded by the mukbang influencer on YouTube. | 0.938 | |||||
If the mukbang influencer appeared on another form of media, I would watch it to know more. | 0.924 | |||||
Purchase intention | If I were to buy an F&B product, I would consider buying what I watch on a mukbang video. | 0.928 | 0.894 | 0.934 | 0.824 | [57] |
The likelihood of me purchasing an F&B product that I saw on a mukbang video is high. | 0.886 | |||||
My willingness to buy an F&B product that I saw on a mukbang video is high. | 0.909 | |||||
Vicarious satisfaction | While watching mukbangs, I can forget my daily life. | 0.948 | 0.926 | 0.953 | 0.871 | [55] |
While watching mukbangs, I feel like those who eat the food. | 0.934 | |||||
While watching mukbangs, I feel like I am eating. | 0.918 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Attitude toward mukbangs | 0.897 ** | ||||||||
(2) Attractiveness | 0.479 | 0.854 ** | |||||||
(3) Enjoyment | 0.563 | 0.561 | 0.885 ** | ||||||
(4) Exposure | 0.739 | 0.631 | 0.458 | 0.898 ** | |||||
(5) Information | 0.548 | 0.503 | 0.552 | 0.478 | 0.898 ** | ||||
(6) Intention to watch | 0.466 | 0.694 | 0.460 | 0.483 | 0.475 | 0.927 ** | |||
(7) Para-social relationships | 0.509 | 0.444 | 0.620 | 0.514 | 0.432 | 0.546 | 0.927 ** | ||
(8) Purchase intention | 0.732 | 0.609 | 0.545 | 0.660 | 0.401 | 0.685 | 0.517 | 0.908 ** | |
(9) Vicarious satisfaction | 0.713 | 0.722 | 0.472 | 0.708 | 0.480 | 0.714 | 0.528 | 0.630 | 0.933 ** |
H | Path | t-Value | Estimates | Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Vicarious satisfaction | → | Attitude toward mukbangs | 10.203 | 0.526 | Supported |
H2 | Enjoyment | → | Attitude toward mukbangs | 5.139 | 0.218 | Supported |
H3 | Information | → | Attitude toward mukbangs | 3.702 | 0.175 | Supported |
H4 | Exposure | → | Para-social relationships | 5.559 | 0.390 | Supported |
H5 | Attractiveness | → | Para-social relationships | 2.716 | 0.198 | Supported |
H6 | Attitude toward mukbangs | → | Intention to watch mukbangs | 13.837 | 0.659 | Supported |
H7 | Para-social relationships | → | Intention to watch mukbangs | 4.082 | 0.210 | Supported |
H8 | Intention to watch mukbangs | → | Purchase intention | 15.436 | 0.686 | Supported |
R2 | ||||||
Attitude toward mukbang | 0.591 (59.1%) | |||||
Para-social relationships | 0.285 (28.5%) | |||||
Intention to watch mukbangs | 0.618 (61.8%) | |||||
Purchase intention | 0.469 (46.9%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Song, H.G.; Kim, Y.-S.; Hwang, E. How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030214
Song HG, Kim Y-S, Hwang E. How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(3):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030214
Chicago/Turabian StyleSong, Hyo Geun, Yen-Soon Kim, and Eunmin Hwang. 2023. "How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 3: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030214
APA StyleSong, H. G., Kim, Y. -S., & Hwang, E. (2023). How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030214