Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
3. Method
3.1. Data Collection
3.2. Measures
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model Assessment
4.2. Structural Model Assessment
5. Conclusions and Implications
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fotiadis, A.; Polyzos, S.; Huan, T.-C.T. The good, the bad and the ugly on COVID-19 tourism recovery. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 87, 103117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, J.; Xiao, X.; Xu, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y. The potential of virtual tourism in the recovery of tourism industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Huang, D.; Shang, X. Social presence or physical presence? Determinants of purchasing behaviour in tourism live-streamed shopping. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 40, 100917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, A. New technologies used in COVID-19 for business survival: Insights from the hotel sector in China. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2020, 22, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Ma, J.; Tong, Y. Livestreaming in tourism: What drives tourism live streamers to share their travel experiences? Tour. Rev. 2022, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Yuan, Y.; He, J.; Li, Z. Framing the travel livestreaming in China: A new star rising under the COVID-19. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 3933–3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, C.; Yu, J.; Huang, S.S.; Zhang, J. Tourism e-commerce live streaming: Identifying and testing a value-based marketing framework from the live streamer perspective. Tour. Manag. 2022, 91, 104513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Li, W.; Xue, J. What and how driving consumer engagement and purchase intention in officer live streaming? A two-factor theory perspective. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2022, 56, 101223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Z.; Benckendorff, P.; Wang, J. From interaction to relationship: Rethinking parasocial phenomena in travel live streaming. Tour. Manag. 2022, 93, 104583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Chen, K.; Qi, J.; Li, J.; Yu, I.Y. Creating immersive and parasocial live shopping experience for viewers: The role of streamers’ interactional communication style. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2023, 17, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, H.; Zhao, C.; Fan, D.X.; Buhalis, D. The effect of hotel livestreaming on viewers’ purchase intention: Exploring the role of parasocial interaction and emotional engagement. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 107, 103348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Hyun, S.S.; Lee, T.J. The effects of parasocial interaction, authenticity, and self-congruity on the formation of consumer trust in online travel agencies. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2022, 24, 563–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Liu, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, C. Influence of livestreamers’ intimate self-disclosure on tourist responses: The lens of parasocial interaction theory. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 57, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, Y.; Yin, J.; Kim, I. Fostering a young audience’s media-induced travel intentions: The role of parasocial interactions. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 47, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, N.; Li, B.; Zhang, T. Live streaming: Pushing limits of hospitality and tourism online experiences. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 3703–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Baek, T.H. Are virtual influencers friends or foes? Uncovering the perceived creepiness and authenticity of virtual influencers in social media marketing in the United States. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2023, 39, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Song, L.; Zhou, J.; Chong, W.; Xiong, W. How Do Comeback Korean Pop Performers Acquire Audience Empathetic Attachment and Sustained Loyalty? Parasocial Interactions Through Live Stream Shows. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 865698. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D.Y.; Kim, H.-Y. Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousaf, S. Food vloggers and parasocial interactions: A comparative study of local and foreign food vlogs using the SOR paradigm. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 3525–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowert, R.; Daniel, E., Jr. The one-and-a-half sided parasocial relationship: The curious case of live streaming. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2021, 4, 100150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.S.; Choe, M.-J.; Zhang, J.; Noh, G.-Y. The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and parasocial relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games: A social cognitive theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 108, 106327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.S.; Kim, H.M. The effect of online fan community attributes on the loyalty and cooperation of fan community members: The moderating role of connect hours. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 68, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.A.; Crowe, J.; Pierre, L.; Lee, Y. Effects of parasocial interaction with an instafamous influencer on brand attitudes and purchase intentions. J. Soc. Media Soc. 2021, 10, 55–78. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, L. Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. J. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 7, 280–294. [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya, A. Parasocial interaction in social media influencer-based marketing: An SEM approach. J. Internet Commer. 2023, 22, 272–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.; Kim, J.J. Emotional attachment, age and online travel community behaviour: The role of parasocial interaction. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 3466–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolova, K.; Kefi, H. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, A.; Hameed, I.; Saeed, S.A. How do social media influencers inspire consumers’ purchase decisions? The mediating role of parasocial relationships. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2023, 47, 1416–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, W.; Li, X. Engaging fans on microblog: The synthetic influence of parasocial interaction and source characteristics on celebrity endorsement. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 720–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filieri, R.; Acikgoz, F.; Li, C.; Alguezaui, S. Influencers’ “organic” persuasion through electronic word of mouth: A case of sincerity over brains and beauty. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 40, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masuda, H.; Han, S.H.; Lee, J. Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 174, 121246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, K.-A.K.; Duhan, D.F.; Dass, M. The preservation of loyalty halo effects: An investigation of the post-product-recall behavior of loyal customers. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabrieli, G.; Ng, S.; Esposito, G. Hacking trust: The presence of faces on automated teller machines (ATMs) affects trustworthiness. Behav. Sci. 2021, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L. How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 127, 107052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Kim, J. How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 111, 106419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, Y.C.; Liao, S.H.; Chang, W.J. Long live friendship? Relationships among friendship, trust and brand loyalty: A study of Starbucks. Int. J. Web Based Communities 2018, 14, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M. Rise of social media influencers as a new marketing channel: Focusing on the roles of psychological well-being and perceived social responsibility among consumers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrontis, D.; Makrides, A.; Christofi, M.; Thrassou, A. Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 617–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceyhan, A. The impact of perception related social media marketing applications on consumers’ brand loyalty and purchase intention. EMAJ Emerg. Mark. J. 2019, 9, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahim, R.S. The role of trust in understanding the impact of social media marketing on brand equity and brand loyalty. J. Relatsh. Mark. 2020, 19, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pop, R.-A.; Săplăcan, Z.; Dabija, D.-C.; Alt, M.-A. The impact of social media influencers on travel decisions: The role of trust in consumer decision journey. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Crisafulli, B.; Quamina, L.T.; Xue, M.T. ‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Peng, Y. What drives gift-giving intention in live streaming? The perspectives of emotional attachment and flow experience. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongkitrungrueng, A.; Assarut, N. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012, 63, 539–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Babin, B.J.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Horton, D.; Richard Wohl, R. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 1956, 19, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M. How can I Be as attractive as a Fitness YouTuber in the era of COVID-19? The impact of digital attributes on flow experience, satisfaction, and behavioral intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 64, 102778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Xu, H.; Gursoy, D. The effect of celebrity endorsement on destination brand love: A comparison of previous visitors and potential tourists. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2020, 17, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlFarraj, O.; Alalwan, A.A.; Obeidat, Z.M.; Baabdullah, A.; Aldmour, R.; Al-Haddad, S. Examining the impact of influencers’ credibility dimensions: Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise on the purchase intention in the aesthetic dermatology industry. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 2021, 31, 355–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leite, F.P.; Baptista, P.D.P. The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2022, 30, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldanha, N.; Mulye, R.; Japutra, A. How do consumers interact with social media influencers in extraordinary times? J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Y.; Shapoval, V.; Busser, J. The role of parasocial relationship in social media marketing: Testing a model among baby boomers. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 1870–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, B.H.; Fong, L.H.N.; Luo, J.M. Parasocial interaction on tourism companies’ social media sites: Antecedents and consequences. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 1093–1108. [Google Scholar]
Demographic Variables | N = 575 | Percent (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | 288 | 50.1% |
Male | 287 | 49.9% | |
Age | 20s | 327 | 56.8% |
30s | 207 | 36.0% | |
40s | 35 | 6.1% | |
Over 50s | 6 | 1.1% | |
Education | High school graduate | 103 | 17.9% |
Working on or completed associate degree | 173 | 30.1% | |
Working on or completed bachelor’s degree | 274 | 47.6% | |
Working on or completed graduate degree | 25 | 4.4% | |
Education | High school | 78 | 20.4% |
College or university degree | 270 | 70.9% | |
Graduate degree | 33 | 8.7% | |
Occupation | Self-employed | 110 | 19.1% |
Employed | 258 | 44.7% | |
Out of work and looking for work | 29 | 5.0% | |
Homemaker | 65 | 11.3% | |
Student | 106 | 18.4% | |
Military | 7 | 1.5% |
Constructs and Items | Standardized Estimates | Critical Ratios |
---|---|---|
Attractiveness | ||
I feel that the travel live streamer is classy. | 0.680 | Fixed |
I feel that the travel live streamer is handsome/beautiful. | 0.830 | 16.856 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is elegant. | 0.790 | 16.273 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is sexy. | 0.778 | 16.076 |
Trustworthiness | ||
I feel that the travel live streamer is dependable. | 0.755 | Fixed |
I feel that the travel live streamer is honest. | 0.788 | 18.341 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is reliable. | 0.820 | 19.030 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is sincere. | 0.693 | 16.068 |
Expertise | ||
I feel that the travel live streamer is an expert. | 0.809 | Fixed |
I feel that the travel live streamer has experience in live streaming. | 0.815 | 21.211 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is knowledgeable in the field of live streaming. | 0.835 | 21.800 |
I feel that the travel live streamer is qualified to broadcast live-streams. | 0.735 | 18.658 |
Perceived friendship | ||
The interactions I have with the travel live streamer feel personally connected. | 0.787 | Fixed |
I experience a sense of closeness and intimacy when I engage with the travel live streamer on his/her social media profile. | 0.912 | 25.514 |
Interacting with the travel live streamer is akin to conversing with one of my close friends. | 0.908 | 25.359 |
I perceive the travel live streamer as someone who could be a friend in real life. | 0.874 | 24.065 |
I feel emotionally connected to the travel live streamer in real life. | 0.867 | 23.817 |
I have a desire to reciprocate and support the travel live streamer in real life. | - | - |
I am inclined to share my genuine thoughts and feelings with the travel live streamer. | - | - |
Trust in a travel live streamer | ||
I believe in the information that the travel live streamer provides through live streaming. | 0.661 | Fixed |
I can trust the travel live streamer when live streaming. | 0.862 | 12.368 |
I do not think that the travel live streamer would take advantage of me while live streaming. | 0.571 | 11.401 |
Loyalty | ||
I am inclined to favor this travel live streamer over others in the future. | 0.857 | Fixed |
I actively seek out this streaming community for information and recommendations related to this travel live streamer. | 0.869 | 20.541 |
I encourage friends and relatives to consider travel recommendations related to this travel live streamer. | 0.643 | 12.623 |
I speak highly of this travel live streamer to others. | 0.446 | 9.153 |
I intend to purchase products associated with this travel live streamer. | 0.718 | 13.723 |
I prefer this travel live streamer over other streamers. | 0.649 | 12.737 |
Cooperation | ||
I make efforts to help maintain the integrity of this streamer’s community (e.g., I report inappropriate advertisements or spam). | 0.832 | Fixed |
I offer my full cooperation with other members of this streamer’s community. | 0.795 | 21.036 |
I diligently adhere to the guidelines and policies of this streamer’s community. | 0.760 | 19.865 |
I make a conscious effort to treat the moderators of and contributors to this streamer’s community with kindness and respect. | 0.728 | 18.794 |
AT | TW | EP | PF | TT | LT | CP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT | 1 | ||||||
TW | 0.496 ** | 1 | |||||
EP | 0.358 ** | 0.528 ** | 1 | ||||
PF | 0.377 ** | 0.422 ** | 0.433 ** | 1 | |||
TT | 0.201 ** | 0.256 ** | 0.336 ** | 0.286 ** | 1 | ||
LT | 0.296 ** | 0.327 ** | 0.459 ** | 0.425 ** | 0.329 ** | 1 | |
CP | 0.279 ** | 0.450 ** | 0.459 ** | 0.514 ** | 0.303 ** | 0.577 ** | 1 |
Mean | 4.766 | 5.188 | 5.030 | 4.867 | 4.714 | 5.009 | 5.208 |
SD | 1.027 | 0.979 | 1.063 | 1.209 | 1.093 | 0.829 | 0.934 |
AVE | 0.595 | 0.586 | 0.693 | 0.758 | 0.502 | 0.506 | 0.608 |
CR | 0.854 | 0.849 | 0.876 | 0.940 | 0.746 | 0.855 | 0.861 |
Path | Standardized Estimate | Standardized Error | Critical Ratio | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1-1 | Attractiveness → Perceived friendship | 0.188 | 0.067 | 3.568 ** | 0.001 |
H1-2 | Trustworthiness → Perceived friendship | 0.197 | 0.068 | 3.169 ** | 0.002 |
H1-3 | Expertise → Perceived friendship | 0.277 | 0.057 | 5.137 ** | 0.001 |
H2-1 | Attractiveness → Trust in a travel live streamer | 0.064 | 0.076 | 1.025 | 0.305 |
H2-2 | Trustworthiness → Trust in a travel live streamer | 0.048 | 0.077 | 0.652 | 0.514 |
H2-3 | Expertise → Trust in a travel live streamer | 0.307 | 0.067 | 4.576 ** | 0.001 |
H3-1 | Perceived friendship → Trust in a travel live streamer | 0.115 | 0.053 | 2.065 * | 0.039 |
H3-2 | Perceived friendship → Loyalty | 0.424 | 0.035 | 8.245 ** | 0.001 |
H3-3 | Perceived friendship → Cooperation | 0.506 | 0.043 | 10.893 ** | 0.001 |
H4-1 | Trust in a travel live streamer → Loyalty | 0.310 | 0.038 | 5.766 ** | 0.001 |
H4-2 | Trust in a travel live streamer → Cooperation | 0.213 | 0.045 | 4.549 ** | 0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, M. Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110953
Kim M. Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(11):953. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110953
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Minseong. 2023. "Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 11: 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110953
APA StyleKim, M. (2023). Parasocial Interactions in Digital Tourism: Attributes of Live Streamers and Viewer Engagement Dynamics in South Korea. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110953