Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Film
2.2.2. Measures
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Statistical Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zizek, S. Cinema Guide of Pervert. Movie. Philosophy. Ideology; Gonzo: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2019; ISBN 978-5-904-577-56-8. [Google Scholar]
- Kashani, T. Movies Change Lives: Pedagogy of Constructive Humanistic Transformation through Cinema; Peter Lang Publishing Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4331-2773-1. [Google Scholar]
- Kubrak, T.A. The problem of information and psychological security in cinema discourse. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya 2016, 9, 8. Available online: http://psystudy.ru (accessed on 27 February 2019).
- Harris, R. Psychology of Mass Communications; Prime-Eurosign: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Bryant, J.; Thompson, S. Basics of Media Exposure; Williams: Мoscow, Russia, 2004; ISBN 5-8459-0597-4. [Google Scholar]
- Latynov, V.V. Psychology of Communicative Impact; Institute of Psychology of RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2013; ISBN 978-5-9270-0255-9. [Google Scholar]
- Gerbner, G.; Gross, L.; Morgan, M.; Signorielli, N. Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Perspectives on Media Effects; Bryant, J., Zillmann, D., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1986; pp. 17–40. [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins, R.; Pingree, S. Using television to construct social reality. J. Broadcast. 1981, 25, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, M.; Shanahan, J. Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In Communication Yearbook (20); Burleson, B.R., Kunkel, A.W., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1997; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan, M. Cultivation analysis and media effects. In The Sage Handbook of Media Processes and Effects; Nabi, R., Oliver, M.B., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 69–82. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, F.; Salmon, C.T.; Pang, J.S.; Cheng, W.J. Media exposure and smoking intention in adolescents: A moderated mediation analysis from a cultivation perspective. J. Health Psychol. 2015, 20, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Morgan, M.; Shanahan, J. The state of cultivation. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 2010, 54, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrum, L.J. Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, 3rd ed.; Byrant, J., Oliver, M.B., Eds.; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 50–73. [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, W.L.; Iyengar, S. A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. J. Commun. 2008, 58, 707–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehata, A.; Stromback, J. Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agendasetting at the aggregate and individual levels. Int. J. Press. 2013, 18, 234–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabi, R.; Riddle, K. Personality traits, television viewing and the cultivation effect. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 2008, 52, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, C.A.; Russell, D.W. Sensation seeking moderates television’s cultivation of alcohol and tobacco beliefs: Evidence from a national study of French adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018, 186, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubrak, T.A. The role of the psychological characteristics of the perception of cinema in the process of its impact. In Psychological Impact in Interpersonal and Mass Communication; Zhuravlev, A.L., Pavlova, N.D., Eds.; Institute of Psychology of RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2014; pp. 94–111. ISBN 78-5-9270-0286-3. [Google Scholar]
- Kubrak, T.A.; Latynov, V.V. Psychology of cinema discourse: Factors of Choice, Perception, Impact; Institute of Psychology of RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2019; ISBN 978-5-9270-0394-5. [Google Scholar]
- Ill Effects: The Media Violence Debate; Barker, M.; Petley, J. (Eds.) Routledge: London, UK, 2002; ISBN 1134756747. [Google Scholar]
- Behm-Morawitz, E.; Mastro, D. Mean girls? The influence of gender portrayals in teen movies on emerging adults’ gender-based attitudes and beliefs. J. Mass Commun. Q. 2008, 85, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mastro, D.; Behm-Morawitz, E.; Kopacz, M. Exposure to television portrayals of latinos: The implications of aversive racism and social identity theory. Hum. Commun. Res. 2008, 34, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimmerle, J.; Cres, U. The Effects of TV and Film Exposure on Knowledge about and Attitudes toward Mental Disorders. J. Community Psychol. 2013, 41, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perciful, M.S.; Meyer, C. The Impact of Films on Viewer Attitudes towards People with Schizophrenia. Curr. Psychol. 2017, 36, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillig, T.K.; Rosenthal, E.L.; Murphy, S.T.; Langrall, K. More than a Media Moment: The Influence of Televised Storylines on Viewers’ Attitudes toward Transgender People and Policies. Sex Roles 2018, 28, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igartua, J.J.; Frutos, F.J. Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. Int. J. Commun. 2017, 11, 158–177. Available online: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5779 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
- Madžarević, G.; Soto-Sanfiel, M.T. Positive Representation of Gay Characters in Movies for Reducing Homophobia. Sex. Cult. 2018, 22, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanewinkel, R.; Sargent, D.; Isensee, B.; Morgenstern, M. Smokers’ Attitude and Intention to Quit after Seeing a Movie with Smoking. SUCHT 2012, 58, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, H.; Hill, D.J.; Borland, R.; Paxton, S.J. Public reaction to the portrayal of the tobacco industry in the film The Insider. Tob. Control 2001, 10, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morgan, S.E.; Movius, L.; Cody, M.J. The power of narratives: The effects of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. J. Commun. 2009, 59, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, M.C.; Brock, T.C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 701–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, M.C.; Clark, J.L. Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for entertainment media influences on tobacco use. Addiction 2013, 108, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, L.; Koopman, C.; Philip, G.; Zimbardo, P. The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film “JFK”: Emotions, Beliefs, and Political Behavioral Intentions. Political Psychol. 1995, 16, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pautz, M. Argo and Zero Dark Thirty: Film, Government, and Audiences. Political Sci. Politics 2015, 48, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Cinema and Television: Cultural Policy and Everyday Life; Bondebjerg, I.; Redvall, E.; Higson, A. (Eds.) Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2015; ISBN 978-1-137-35688-8. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, F.; Bergh, B. Movies Influence on Country Concept. In Shaping International Public Opinion A Model for Nation Branding and Public Diplomacy; Fullerton, J.A., Kendrick, A., Eds.; Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 113–133. ISBN 978-1-4331-3573-6. [Google Scholar]
- Valkenburg, P.M.; Cantor, J. The development of a child into a consumer. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2001, 22, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobkin, V.S.; Markina, O.S. The Film “Scarecrow" through the Eyes of Modern Students. Works on the Sociology of Education (14); Institute of Sociology of Education of RAO: Moscow, Russian, 2010; ISBN 978-5-901289-21-1. [Google Scholar]
- Andreeva, O.S.; Bogdanova, M.V. Cinema therapy as a way of forming ethnic tolerance among students. Pedag. Educ. Russ. 2017, 3, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baran, S.B.; Chase, L.; Courtright, J. Television drama as a facilitator of prosocial behavior. J. Broadcast. 1979, 23, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forge, K.L.; Phemister, S. The effect of prosocial cartoons on preschool children. Child Study J. 1987, 17, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
- Lowe, T.; Brown, K.; Dessai, S.; de Franca Doria, M.; Haynes, K.; Vincent, K. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Underst. Sci. 2006, 15, 435–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGreavey, B.; Liendfield, L. Entertaining our way to engagement? Climate change films and sustainable development values. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2008, 17, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramasubramanian, S. A Content Analysis of the Portrayal of India in Films Produced in the West. Howard J. Commun. 2005, 16, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirby, D. Cinematic science: The public communication of science and technology in popular film. In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology; Bucchi, M., Trench, B., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 41–56. [Google Scholar]
- Lemish, V.V. Representations of students studying in the specialty "social work" about the elderly and old people. News Russ. State Pedag. Univ. 2013, 158, 36–48. [Google Scholar]
- Berger, R. Aging in America: Ageism and General Attitudes toward Growing Old and the Elderly. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2017, 5, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fillmer, H. Thompson Children’s descriptions of and attitudes toward the elderly. Educ. Gerontol. 1984, 10, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, T.; Callister, M.; Magoffin, D. Older Characters in Teen Movies from 1980–2006. Educ. Gerontol. 2009, 35, 687–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harwood, J.; Giles, H. Don’t make me laugh: Age representations in a humorous context. Discourse Soc. 1992, 3, 403–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dooley, S.; Frankel, B. Improving Attitudes Toward Elderly People: Evaluation of an Intervention Program for Adolescents. Can. J. Aging 1990, 9, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aday, R.; Sims, C.; Evans, E. Youth’s Attitudes Toward the Elderly: The Impact of Intergenerational Partners. J. Appl. Gerontol. 1991, 10, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, M.; Cheren, C.; Patchner, M.; Cook, S. Changing Attitudes toward Aging Using Films. Gerontologist 1983, 23, 106–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrman, M.; Nilsson, L. Attitudes to Ageing and Elderly Care—Film Stories as Mirror or Creator of Norms. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Educ. 2015, 2, 55–66. Available online: www.arcjournals.org (accessed on 17 December 2019).
- McCleary, R. Using Film and Intergenerational Colearning to Enhance Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Older Adults. Educ. Gerontol. 2014, 40, 414–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laganá, L.; Gavrilova, L.; Carter, D.; Ainsworth, A. A Randomized Controlled Study on the Effects of a Documentary on Students’ Empathy and Attitudes towards Older Adults. Psychol. Cogn. Sci. 2017, 3, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrenko, V.F. Fundamentals of Psychosemantics; Peter: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2005; ISBN 5-94723-527-7. [Google Scholar]
- Bokhan, T.G.; Alekseeva, L.F.; Shabalovskaya, M.V.; Moreva, S.A.; Kuznetsova, T.M. Personal characteristics as resources and potential of development of psychological readiness for research work. TSPU Bull. 2013, 11, 98–102. [Google Scholar]
- Graaf, A.; Hoeken, H.; Sanders, J.; Beentjes, H. Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Commun. Res. 2012, 39, 802–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moyer-Gusé, E. Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Commun. Theory 2008, 18, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, M.B.; Krakowiak, K.M. Individual differences in media effects. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research; Bryant, J., Oliver, M.B., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 517–531. [Google Scholar]
Scales | Mean before Watching the Film | Mean after Watching the Film | Z | Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
---|---|---|---|---|
emotional - unemotional* | 1.10 | 1.68 | -2.787b | 0.005 |
purposeless - purposeful | −0.17 | −1.18 | −3.187c | 0.001 |
active life position - having no life goal* | −0.02 | 1.21 | −3.121b | 0.002 |
no desire to learn anything - the desire to learn a new skill | 0.22 | −1.03 | −3.899c | 0.000 |
cheerful - prone to depression* | 0.40 | 1.02 | −2.053b | 0.040 |
passive - initiative | 0.28 | −0.88 | −3.325c | 0.001 |
unrestrained – self-contained | −0.03 | −0.65 | −2.038c | 0.042 |
conflict - peaceful | −0.28 | −0.80 | −2.281c | 0.023 |
strives for a full life - lost the meaning of life* | 0.35 | 1.35 | −3.451b | 0.001 |
craving for spirituality - limited interests* | 0.68 | 1.67 | −2.791b | 0.005 |
quickly tired - having a high stamina | 1.68 | 0.37 | −3.420c | 0.001 |
new is not perceived to be good - a modern view on new things | 1.35 | −0.62 | −4.894c | 0.000 |
Scales | Mean before Watching the Film | Mean after Watching the Film | Z | Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
---|---|---|---|---|
smart - stupid | −0.40 | −1.10 | −3.383b | 0.001 |
purposeless - purposeful | −0.17 | 0.60 | −3.036c | 0.002 |
active life position - having no life goal* | −0.67 | −0.47 | −2.347b | 0.019 |
no desire to learn anything - the desire to learn new skills | −1.07 | 0.23 | −3.795c | 0.000 |
cheerful - prone to depression* | 0.33 | −0.97 | −3.795b | 0.002 |
passive - initiative | −0.53 | 0.37 | −2.673c | 0.008 |
takes responsibility - blames others for problems | 0.40 | −0.53 | −3.077b | 0.002 |
conflict - peaceful | −0.40 | 0.33 | −2.729c | 0.006 |
strives for a full life - lost the meaning of life* | −0.20 | −1.07 | −2.361b | 0.018 |
quickly tired – high stamina | −1.73 | −0.47 | −3.376c | 0.001 |
considered someone else’s opinions - imposing their own opinions* | 1.30 | −0.10 | −4.065b | 0.000 |
have achieved in life what they wanted - many things in life could not do * | 0.77 | −0.20 | −3.050b | 0.002 |
traditional - modern | −1.37 | −0.17 | −3.493c | 0.000 |
with a sense of humor - without a sense of humor | −0.57 | −1.10 | −2.430b | 0.015 |
Scales | Mean Rank Group one | Mean Rank Group two | Z | Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
---|---|---|---|---|
smart - stupid | 48.83 | 17.73 | −6.430 | 0.000 |
emotional - unemotional | 47.59 | 19.38 | −5.31 | 0.000 |
always comes to the rescue of others - only cares for oneself | 46.44 | 20.92 | −5.290 | 0.000 |
purposeless – purposeful | 25.81 | 46.95 | −4.413 | 0.000 |
An active life position - having no life goal* | 43.85 | 23.50 | −4.270 | 0.000 |
no desire to learn anything - the desire to learn new skills | 27.24 | 45.08 | −3.759 | 0.000 |
cheerful - prone to depression* | 45.84 | 21.72 | −4.984 | 0.000 |
passive – has initiative | 28.35 | 45.03 | −3.479 | 0.001 |
interesting to chat - it is hard to find a topic for communication with them | 45.21 | 21.73 | −4.888 | 0.000 |
takes responsibility - blames others for problems | 42.64 | 25.98 | −3.439 | 0.001 |
life experience is out of date - wise | 27.49 | 46.18 | −3.869 | 0.000 |
persistent - does not complete goals | 48.23 | 18.53 | −6.176 | 0.000 |
conflict - peaceful | 25.99 | 43.43 | −2.865 | 0.004 |
strives for a full life - lost the meaning of life | 46.45 | 20.90 | −5.281 | 0.000 |
craving for spirituality - limited interests | 48.53 | 18.13 | −6.262 | 0.000 |
balanced - aggressive | 43.58 | 24.73 | −3.903 | 0.000 |
fast tired - stamina | 39.78 | 29.80 | −2.067 | 0.039 |
with a sense of humor - without a sense of humor | 48.06 | 18.75 | −6.089 | 0.000 |
undecisive - decisive | 24.46 | 50.22 | −5.358 | 0.000 |
communicative - closed | 48.06 | 18.75 | −6.046 | 0.000 |
cruel - kind | 25.95 | 48.23 | −4.632 | 0.000 |
Scales | Mean before Watching the Film | Mean in 2 Weeks after Watching the Film | Z | Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
---|---|---|---|---|
emotional - unemotional* | 1.10 | 1.14 | ||
purposeless - purposeful | −0.17 | −0.43 | ||
active life position - having no life goal* | −0.02 | 0.23 | ||
no desire to learn anything – the desire to learn a new skill | 0.22 | −0.14 | ||
cheerful - prone to depression* | 0.40 | 0.77 | ||
passive - initiative | 0.28 | −0.23 | ||
unrestrained - self-contained | −0.03 | 0.06 | ||
conflict - peaceful | −0.28 | −0.11 | ||
strives for a full life - lost the meaning of life* | 0.35 | 1.00 | −2.050b | 0.040 |
craving for spirituality - limited interests* | 0.68 | 1.31 | −2.037b | 0.042 |
quickly tired - high stamina | 1.68 | 1.03 | −2.096c | 0.036 |
traditional - modern | 1.35 | 0.63 | −2.850c | 0.004 |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kubrak, T. Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10050086
Kubrak T. Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie. Behavioral Sciences. 2020; 10(5):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10050086
Chicago/Turabian StyleKubrak, Tina. 2020. "Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie" Behavioral Sciences 10, no. 5: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10050086
APA StyleKubrak, T. (2020). Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie. Behavioral Sciences, 10(5), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10050086