Characteristics and Sources of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Geological Setting
2.1. Regional Geological Characteristics
2.2. Geological Characteristics of Ore Deposits
3. Sampling and Methods
- (1)
- Sampling
- (2)
- Elemental analyses
- (3)
- Mineralogical characterization
- (4)
- Raman and infrared analysis of OM
- (5)
- Fluid inclusion analysis
- (6)
- Isotope analyses
4. Results
4.1. Petrology and Mineralogy
4.1.1. Petrology and Alteration
4.1.2. Occurrence Characteristics of U-Minerals
4.1.3. Characteristics of Organic Matter
4.2. Geochemical Characteristics of Elements
4.2.1. Major and Trace Elements
4.2.2. In Situ Trace Elements of Pyrite
4.3. Fluid Inclusion
4.3.1. Fluid Inclusion Petrography
4.3.2. Fluid Inclusion Compositions
4.3.3. Temperature and Salinity of Fluid Inclusions
4.4. In Situ Sulfur Isotope Analysis of Pyrite
5. Discussion
5.1. Characteristics of the Ore-Forming Fluids
5.2. Origin of Ore-Forming Fluids
5.3. Evolution of Ore-Forming Fluids
5.4. Implications of Fluid Evolution for Uranium Mineralization
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tian, M.; Li, Z.; Jia, L.; Liu, J.; Ning, J.; Li, J. Epigenetic Alteration of the Hailijin Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Deposit and Its Indications on Uranium Metallogenesis in the Songliao Basin, NE China. Minerals 2025, 15, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Zou, H.; Wang, C.; Meng, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, S. Mesozoic–Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution and Dynamics of the Songliao Basin, NE Asia: Implications for the Closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean and Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean and Subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Ocean. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 218, 103471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Ren, J.; Liu, K.; Shen, C.; Stepashko, A. Post-Rift Anomalous Thermal Flux in the Songliao Basin, NE China, as Revealed from Fission Track Thermochronology and Tectonic Analysis. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018, 508, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Xia, F.; Yin, S.; Fu, J.; Ning, J.; Zhang, X.-N.; Zang, Y.; Duan, J. Uranium Pre-Concentration in Sandstone-Hosted U Deposits: A Case Study from the Hailijin Ore Field, SW Songliao Basin, NE China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 161, 105661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuney, M.; Mercadier, J.; Bonnetti, C. Classification of Sandstone-Related Uranium Deposits. J. Earth Sci. 2022, 33, 236–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Qin, M.; Jia, L.; Tian, M.; Xing, Z.; Zhang, Y. U-Pb Isochron Age Calculation and Related Issues in Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Deposits: A Case Study from the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2026, 192, 107248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Rong, H.; Kang, S.; Ning, J.; Tang, G.; Zhang, L.; Ma, S. Genesis of Ankerite and Its Relationship with Uranium Mineralization in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Southern Songliao Basin, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2026, 189, 107130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Niu, Q.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Lu, T.; Pan, J.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, W.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, X.; et al. Fracture Propagation Mechanism and CO2+O2 In-Situ Leaching Effect of Low-Permeability Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits under Millisecond Blasting. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2026, 58, 104461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Q.; Wang, J.; He, J.; Chang, J.; Shi, X.; Wang, W.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Q.; Liang, X.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Inversion and Optimization of CO2+O2 in Situ Leaching of Blasting-Stimulated Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits. Phys. Fluids 2025, 37, 036639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Liang, X.; Niu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zhuo, J.; Su, X.; Zhou, G.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, W.; Chang, J.; et al. Reformability Evaluation of Blasting-Enhanced Permeability in in Situ Leaching Mining of Low-Permeability Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2023, 55, 2773–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cumberland, S.A.; Douglas, G.; Grice, K.; Moreau, J.W. Uranium Mobility in Organic Matter-Rich Sediments: A Review of Geological and Geochemical Processes. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 159, 160–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorin, Y.A. Geodynamics of the Western Part of the Mongolia–Okhotsk Collisional Belt, Trans-Baikal Region (Russia) and Mongolia. Tectonophysics 1999, 306, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Zhou, X.-H.; Zhang, L.-C.; Ying, J.-F.; Zhang, Y.-T.; Wu, F.-Y.; Zhu, R.-X. Late Mesozoic Volcanism in the Great Xing’an Range (NE China): Timing and Implications for the Dynamic Setting of NE Asia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 251, 179–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Mattern, F.; Didenko, N.; Zhu, D.; Singer, B.; Sun, X. Tectonics and Cycle System of the Cretaceous Songliao Basin: An Inverted Active Continental Margin Basin. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 159, 82–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Li, Z.; He, D.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Fang, H. The Deep Structure of the Western Slope of the Songliao Basin and Its Implications for the Evolution of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (Eastern Segment). Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Hou, H.; An, D.; Fu, W.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Y.; Ma, F. Sequence Stratigraphic, Resource Potential, and Global Cretaceous Event Linkage of the Shahezi Formation in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression: New Insights from Well SK2. Geosciences 2026, 16, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodnar, R.J. Revised equation and table for determining the freezing point depression of H2O–NaCl solutions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 683–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, H.; Liu, J.; Meng, Q. Structural and Sedimentary Evolution of the Southern Songliao Basin, Northeast China, and Implications for Hydrocarbon Prospectivity. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 533–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregory, D.D.; Large, R.R.; Halpin, J.A.; Baturina, E.L.; Lyons, T.W.; Wu, S.; Danyushevsky, L.; Sack, P.J.; Chappaz, A.; Maslennikov, V.V.; et al. Trace Element Content of Sedimentary Pyrite in Black Shales. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 1389–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seal, R.R. Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry of Sulfide Minerals. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2006, 61, 633–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steadman, J.A.; Large, R.R.; Olin, P.H.; Danyushevsky, L.V.; Meffre, S.; Huston, D.; Fabris, A.; Lisitsin, V.; Wells, T. Pyrite Trace Element Behavior in Magmatic-Hydrothermal Environments: An LA-ICPMS Imaging Study. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 128, 103878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abudukeyumu, A.; Song, H.; Chi, G.; Li, Q.; Zhang, C. Quaternary Uranium Mineralization in the Qaidam Basin, Northern Tibetan Plateau: Insights from Petrographic and C-O Isotopic Evidences. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 140, 104628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingles, C.; Mavrogenes, J.; Wang, Y.; Cherdantseva, M.; Saxey, D.; Fougerouse, D. Biogenic Sphalerite Signatures and pH-Dependent Precipitation Pathways. Appl. Geochem. 2026, 197, 106677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, C.; Li, H.; Li, K.; Wang, D. Thermochemical Sulfate Reduction in Sedimentary Basins and beyond: A Review. Chem. Geol. 2022, 607, 121018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, L.; Jiao, Y.; Fayek, M.; Wu, L.; Rong, H. Micromorphologies and Sulfur Isotopic Compositions of Pyrite in Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Deposits: A Review and Implications for Ore Genesis. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 139, 104512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habicht, K.S.; Canfield, D.E.; Rethmeier, J. Sulfur Isotope Fractionation during Bacterial Reduction and Disproportionation of Thiosulfate and Sulfite. Geochim. ET Cosmochim. Acta 1998, 62, 2585–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canfield, D.E.; Thamdrup, B. Fate of Elemental Sulfur in an Intertidal Sediment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1996, 19, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habicht, K.S.; Canfield, D.E. Sulfur Isotope Fractionation during Bacterial Sulfate Reduction in Organic-Rich Sediments. Geochim. ET Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 5351–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, S.; Ning, Y.; Xiao, L.; Huang, K.; Chen, S.; Zhu, X.; He, H.; Yu, M. Elemental Geochemical Analysis for the Gold–Antimony Segregation in the Gutaishan Deposit: Insights from Stibnite and Pyrite. Geosciences 2025, 15, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machel, H.G. Bacterial and Thermochemical Sulfate Reduction in Diagenetic Settings—Old and New Insights. Sediment. Geol. 2001, 140, 143–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canfield, D.E. Biogeochemistry of Sulfur Isotopes. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2001, 43, 607–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Xie, X.; Frank, M.; Ren, Y.; Zhu, D.; Sun, X. The Cretaceous Songliao Basin: Volcanogenic Succession, Sedimentary Sequence and Tectonic Evolution, NE China. Acta Geol. Sin.-Engl. Ed. 2007, 81, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Cook, N.; Yang, T.; Ciobanu, C.; Zhao, K.; Jiang, S. Mapping of Sulfur Isotopes and Trace Elements in Sulfides by LA-(MC)-ICP-MS: Potential Analytical Problems, Improvements and Implications. Minerals 2016, 6, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bralia, A.; Sabatini, G.; Troja, F. A Revaluation of the Co/Ni Ratio in Pyrite as Geochemical Tool in Ore Genesis Problems. Mineral. Depos. 1979, 14, 353–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bau, M. Rare-Earth Element Mobility during Hydrothermal and Metamorphic Fluid-Rock Interaction and the Significance of the Oxidation State of Europium. Chem. Geol. 1991, 93, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraitis, P.K.; Pattrick, R.A.D.; Vaughan, D.J. Variations in the Compositional, Textural and Electrical Properties of Natural Pyrite: A Review. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2004, 74, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Qin, M.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Wu, Q.; Qiu, L.; et al. Exudative metallogeny of the Hadatu sandstone-type uranium deposit in the Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia. Geol. China 2022, 49, 1009–1047. [Google Scholar]
- Keith, M.; Häckel, F.; Haase, K.M.; Schwarz-Schampera, U.; Klemd, R. Trace Element Systematics of Pyrite from Submarine Hydrothermal Vents. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 72, 728–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, D.; Zhu, R.; Liu, W.; Liu, R.; Shou, H.; Cheng, X.; Cai, Y.; Lei, Z.; Deng, P.; Peng, Y. Metallogenic Characteristics and Models of Sandstone-Type Uranium Deposits in China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2024, 166, 105937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanly, A.J.; Kyser, T.K.; Hiatt, E.E.; Marlatt, J.; Foster, S. The Uranium Mineralization Potential of the Paleoproterozoic Sioux Basin and Its Relationship to Other Basins in the Southern Lake Superior Region. Precambrian Res. 2006, 148, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Jiao, Y.; Wu, L.; Rong, H. Roles of Dispersed Organic Matters in Sandstone-Type Uranium Mineralization: A Review of Geological and Geochemical Processes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 139, 104485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, C.; Dong, H.; Li, H.; Xiao, X.; Ou, G.; Zhang, C. Mineralogical and Geochemical Evidence for Coupled Bacterial Uranium Mineralization and Hydrocarbon Oxidation in the Shashagetai Deposit, NW China. Chem. Geol. 2007, 236, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, E.H.; Mosselmans, J.F.W.; Schofield, P.F. Uranyl-Citrate Speciation in Acidic Aqueous Solutions—An XAS Study between 25 and 200 °C. Chem. Geol. 2005, 216, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bone, S.E.; Dynes, J.J.; Cliff, J.; Bargar, J.R. Uranium(IV) Adsorption by Natural Organic Matter in Anoxic Sediments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fox, A.R.; Bart, S.C.; Meyer, K.; Cummins, C.C. Towards Uranium Catalysts. Nature 2008, 455, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, H.; Ni, S.; Chi, G.; Zhang, C.; Hou, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, G.; Yan, W. Systematic Variations of H-O-C Isotopes in Different Alteration Zones of Sandstone-Hosted Uranium Deposits in the Southern Margin of the Yili Basin (Xinjiang, China): A Review and Implications for the Ore-Forming Mechanisms. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 107, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S.; Yan, Z.; Fu, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; Xia, F.; Wang, Q. Polymorphic Transformations of Titanium Oxides Contribute to Economic Uranium Mineralization in Sandstone. Geology 2024, 52, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Sample ID | Lithology | Depth/m | Sample ID | Lithology | Depth/m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0-2-1 | Gy M-gd ST | 565 | L16-1-6 * | Gy M-gd ST | 558.0 |
| L0-2-5 | Gy F-gd ST | 572 | L16-1-7 * | Gy M-gd ST | 559.6 |
| L0-2-25 * | Gy M-gd ST | 597 | L16-1-8 * | Gy F-gd ST | 562.5 |
| L0-5-3 | Rd M-gd ST | 590.5 | L16-1-9 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 566.8 |
| L0-5-4 | Gy F-gd ST | 589.5 | L12-6-10 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 572.3 |
| L0-5-7 * | Gy M-gd ST | 587.5 | L12-6-11 | Gy-Wt C-gd ST | 576.6 |
| L0-5-8 * | Gy M-gd ST | 586.5 | L14-3-26 | Rd F-gd ST | 547.13 |
| L0-5-9 * | Gy M-gd ST | 585.3 | L14-3-28 | Gy F-gd ST | 564.1 |
| L0-5-10 | Gy M-gd ST | 580.3 | L14-3-29 | Gy F-gd ST | 565.1 |
| L1-1 * | D-Gy M-gd ST | 572 | L14-3-34 * | Gy F-gd ST | 570.1 |
| L1-2 * | Gy M-gd ST | 573 | L14-3-35 * | Gy F-gd ST | 575.0 |
| L1-4 * | Gy M-gd ST | 578.6 | L14-3-36 * | Gy F-gd ST | 575.5 |
| L1-7 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 579.66 | L4-5-9 | Rd F-gd ST | 595.5 |
| L1-8 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 580.6 | L4-5-12 | Rd F-gd ST | 557.3 |
| L1-17 * | D-Gy M-gd ST | 584.3 | L2-1 * | Gy M-gd ST | 578 |
| L16-1-1 | Rd F-gd ST | 541.3 | L2-2 * | Gy M-gd ST | 587 |
| L16-1-2 | Rd F-gd ST | 548.7 | L2-3 * | Gy M-gd ST | 589 |
| L16-1-3 | Rd F-gd ST | 552.0 | L2-9 * | Gy C-gd ST | 590.2 |
| ZKL-13 * | Gy M-gd ST | 580.3 | L3-1 * | D-Gy M-gd ST | 601.35 |
| ZKL-17 * | Gy M-gd ST | 584.3 | L3-2 * | D-Gy M-gd ST | 602.78 |
| Sample.ID | Lithology | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | FeO | MnO2 | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI | Fe3+/Fe2+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L16-1-1 | Rd F-gd ST | 76.13 | 0.45 | 12.14 | 1.22 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.406 | 0.52 | 0.517 | 3.49 | 0.094 | 4.58 | 2.29 |
| L16-1-2 | Rd F-gd ST | 72.33 | 0.536 | 11.98 | 2.82 | 0.5 | 0.041 | 0.745 | 1.22 | 0.479 | 3.31 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 5.08 |
| L16-1-3 | Rd F-gd ST | 75.6 | 0.399 | 11.09 | 1.23 | 0.71 | 0.032 | 0.612 | 1.32 | 0.397 | 3.38 | 0.074 | 5.26 | 1.56 |
| L16-1-6 * | Gy M-gd ST | 76.24 | 0.365 | 11.21 | 0.40 | 0.85 | 0.017 | 0.508 | 1.07 | 0.304 | 3.4 | 0.076 | 5.53 | 0.42 |
| L16-1-7 * | Gy M-gd ST | 78.37 | 0.31 | 10.17 | 0.38 | 0.89 | 0.023 | 0.491 | 1.05 | 0.269 | 3.27 | 0.079 | 4.72 | 0.38 |
| L16-1-9 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 76.2 | 0.212 | 9.4 | 0.58 | 1.29 | 0.181 | 0.939 | 2.17 | 0.297 | 3.34 | 0.064 | 5.39 | 0.40 |
| L16-1-10 | Gy-Wt M-gd ST | 76.35 | 0.331 | 10.72 | 0.40 | 1.06 | 0.022 | 0.767 | 1.58 | 0.288 | 3.4 | 0.059 | 4.93 | 0.34 |
| L16-1-11 | Gy-Wt C-gd ST | 75.79 | 0.312 | 9.81 | 0.48 | 1.05 | 0.028 | 0.939 | 2.07 | 0.279 | 3.12 | 0.068 | 6.08 | 0.41 |
| L14-3-26 | Rd F-gd ST | 74.69 | 0.56 | 12.9 | 2.42 | 0.45 | 0.027 | 0.426 | 0.519 | 0.491 | 3.47 | 0.111 | 4.09 | 4.85 |
| L14-3-28 | Gy F-gd ST | 71.86 | 0.548 | 11.87 | 1.70 | 2.9 | 0.22 | 0.837 | 0.859 | 0.312 | 3.08 | 0.099 | 5.85 | 0.53 |
| L14-3-29 | Gy F-gd ST | 70.05 | 0.635 | 13.51 | 1.41 | 0.93 | 0.068 | 1.08 | 1.92 | 0.531 | 3.22 | 0.133 | 6.61 | 1.37 |
| L14-3-34 | Gy F-gd ST | 78.4 | 0.325 | 10.09 | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.092 | 0.602 | 1.44 | 0.251 | 3.23 | 0.092 | 4.41 | 0.41 |
| L14-3-35 * | Gy F-gd ST | 74.22 | 0.251 | 9.97 | 0.48 | 1.48 | 0.031 | 1.12 | 2.39 | 0.252 | 3.24 | 0.056 | 6.28 | 0.29 |
| L14-3-36 * | Gy F-gd ST | 77.39 | 0.319 | 9.58 | 0.39 | 1.06 | 0.025 | 0.887 | 1.89 | 0.3 | 2.93 | 0.066 | 5.13 | 0.33 |
| ZKL-17 * | Gy M-gd ST | 80.75 | 0.252 | 9.45 | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.012 | 0.259 | 0.438 | 0.328 | 3.53 | 0.073 | 2.8 | 0.30 |
| ZKL-13 * | Gy M-gd ST | 80.64 | 0.241 | 9.19 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 0.016 | 0.474 | 0.985 | 0.283 | 3.17 | 0.071 | 3.58 | 0.62 |
| L2-1 * | Gy M-gd ST | 79.5 | 0.225 | 8.27 | 0.78 | 1.59 | 0.032 | 0.699 | 1.29 | 0.275 | 2.84 | 0.088 | 4.36 | 0.44 |
| L2-2 * | Gy M-gd ST | 79.95 | 0.246 | 8.56 | 0.86 | 1.85 | 0.036 | 0.612 | 0.707 | 0.272 | 2.76 | 0.097 | 4.1 | 0.42 |
| L0-2-1 | Gy M-gd ST | 79 | 0.44 | 11.9 | 0.17 | 0.6 | 0.019 | 0.258 | 0.307 | 0.309 | 3.55 | 0.081 | 3.23 | 0.25 |
| L0-2-5 | Gy F-gd ST | 78.6 | 0.299 | 11.1 | 0.12 | 0.86 | 0.018 | 0.44 | 0.951 | 0.374 | 3.51 | 0.075 | 3.64 | 0.12 |
| L0-2-25 * | Gy M-gd ST | 81.5 | 0.242 | 9.39 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.012 | 0.385 | 0.876 | 0.288 | 3.3 | 0.11 | 3.07 | 0.20 |
| Sample | Lithology | Spot | Host Mineral | FI Type | Size (μm) | Th (°C) | Tm-ice (°C) | Salinity (wt.% NaCl eq.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZKL-13 | dark gray medium- to coarse-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 6 × 3 | 136 | −2.8 | 4.65 |
| 2 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 4 | 153 | −2.8 | 4.65 | ||
| 3 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 5 | 135 | −4.8 | 7.59 | ||
| 4 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 7 × 12 | 129 | −3 | 4.96 | ||
| ZKL0-5 | Gray medium-to coarse-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 6 | 130 | −3.2 | 5.26 |
| 2 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 6 | 121 | — | — | ||
| 3 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 7 × 5 | 127 | −4.3 | 6.88 | ||
| 4 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 6 | 135 | −3.5 | 5.71 | ||
| 5 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 3 | 127 | −2.5 | 4.18 | ||
| ZKL2-2 | Gray medium-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 7 × 10 | 137 | −4.1 | 6.59 |
| ZKL3-2 | Gray medium-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 6 | 127.3 | −2.8 | 4.65 |
| 2 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 9 | 94 | −1.9 | 3.23 | ||
| 3 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 5 | 94 | −1.9 | 3.23 | ||
| 4 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 5 | 98 | −3 | 4.96 | ||
| 5 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 6 | 98 | −2.1 | 3.55 | ||
| 6 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 6 | 129 | −3.9 | 6.3 | ||
| 7 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 9 × 6 | 112 | −3.1 | 6.45 | ||
| 8 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 7 × 5 | 152 | — | — | ||
| 9 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 5 | 135 | −3.6 | 5.86 | ||
| ZKL2-1 | Gray medium-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 6 | 143 | −3 | 6.45 |
| 2 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 5 | 95 | −2.6 | 4.34 | ||
| 3 | Detrital quartz | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 5 | 168 | −3.9 | 6.3 | ||
| ZKL1-7 | Gray-white medium- grained sandstone(non-mineralized) | 1 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 13 | 90 | −1.5 | 2.57 |
| 2 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 5 | 83 | −1.9 | 3.23 | ||
| 3 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 9 × 5 | 69 | — | — | ||
| 4 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 10 × 15 | 75 | — | — | ||
| 5 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 20 × 25 | 77 | −2.0 | 3.39 | ||
| 6 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 12 × 18 | 72 | −1.7 | 2.9 | ||
| 7 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 10 × 8 | 78 | −1.7 | 2.9 | ||
| 8 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 12 × 15 | 70 | — | — | ||
| 9 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 17 × 15 | 80 | −5.4 | 8.41 | ||
| 10 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 5 | 73 | −1.1 | 1.91 | ||
| 11 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 5 | 73 | −1 | 1.74 | ||
| ZKL2-9 | Gray medium-to coarse-grained sandstone (ore) | 1 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 13 | 188 | −0.5 | 0.88 |
| 2 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 9 × 5 | 199 | −1.6 | 2.74 | ||
| 3 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 7 × 5 | 189 | −1.0 | 1.74 | ||
| 4 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 5 | 185 | −1.0 | 1.74 | ||
| 5 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 5 | 115 | −5.1 | 8 | ||
| 6 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 3 | 124 | −5.1 | 8 | ||
| 7 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 12 | 195 | −3.6 | 5.86 | ||
| 8 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 4 | 194 | −3.6 | 5.86 | ||
| 9 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 11 × 8 | 183 | −2.3 | 3.87 | ||
| 10 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 6 | 163 | −1.5 | 2.57 | ||
| 11 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 3 × 4 | 173 | −2.7 | 4.49 | ||
| 12 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 4 × 5 | 95 | −7.2 | 10.73 | ||
| 13 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 8 × 13 | 102 | −7.2 | 10.73 | ||
| 14 | Dolomite cement | Aqueous inclusion | 15 × 12 | 218 | −0.5 | 0.88 |
| Stratigraphy | Spot ID | δ34SV-CDT (‰) | Spot ID | δ34SV-CDT (‰) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Cretaceous Yaojia Formation | L12-6-4-1 | −44.6 | L0-2-25-4 | −43.3 |
| L12-6-4-2 | −49.1 | L0-2-25-5 | −44.5 | |
| L12-6-4-3 | −49.2 | L0-2-25-6 | −44.1 | |
| L12-6-3-1 | −46.6 | L0-5-1 | −36.4 | |
| L12-6-3-2 | −48.3 | L0-5-2 | −45.7 | |
| L0-2-25-1 | −26.5 | L0-5-3 | −45.2 | |
| L0-2-25-2 | −36.5 | L0-5-4 | −47.3 | |
| L0-2-25-3 | −23.1 | L0-5-5 | −40.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, Z.; Tian, M.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Ning, J.; Cai, J.; Qiu, L. Characteristics and Sources of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Geosciences 2026, 16, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16080301
Li Z, Tian M, Li M, Wang J, Ning J, Cai J, Qiu L. Characteristics and Sources of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Geosciences. 2026; 16(8):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16080301
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Ziying, Mingming Tian, Menghua Li, Junxian Wang, Jun Ning, Jianfang Cai, and Linfei Qiu. 2026. "Characteristics and Sources of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin" Geosciences 16, no. 8: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16080301
APA StyleLi, Z., Tian, M., Li, M., Wang, J., Ning, J., Cai, J., & Qiu, L. (2026). Characteristics and Sources of Ore-Forming Fluids in the Hailijin Uranium Deposit, Songliao Basin. Geosciences, 16(8), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16080301

