Next Article in Journal
Fungal Network Effects on Coupled Thermo-Hydraulic Behavior of Sand Under Controlled Surface Heating
Previous Article in Journal
Subsoil Characterisation in an Abandoned Dam in Central Mexico Using Geoelectrical Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monazite and Cassiterite Dating and Pyrite S Isotopes of the Helukou Tungsten-Tin Polymetallic Deposit of the Guposhan Ore District, Nanling Range: Implications for Ore Genesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt

1
Xi’an Mineral Resources Survey, China Geological Survey, Xi’an 710100, China
2
Technology Innovation Center for Gold Ore Exploration, China Geological Survey, Xi’an 710100, China
3
Longnan Zijin Mining Limited Company, Longnan 746005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2026, 16(6), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208
Submission received: 30 March 2026 / Revised: 12 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 22 May 2026

Abstract

The lamprophyre dikes and multi-generational pyrite and arsenopyrite developed in the Jinshan gold deposit in the West Qinling metallogenic belt provide critical evidence for understanding the role of mantle-derived magmatism in gold mineralization processes. In this study, we conducted zircon U-Pb dating of lamprophyre to constrain the timing of magmatic activity and the mineralization age, and performed EMPA and LA-ICP-MS analyses on sulfides from the main metallogenic stage (Py II–III, Apy II–III) and lamprophyre-hosted pyrite (Py L) to constrain the formation conditions and metal sources of the Jinshan deposit. The results show that the mantle-derived magmatism represented by lamprophyre yields an age of 206 ± 2 Ma, which provides a lower-limit constraint on the timing of gold mineralization, corresponding to the subduction-to-extension transition period in the region. Stage II mineralization occurred at 270–320 °C with logƒS2 of −9 to −5, dominantly as Au-HS complexes, indicating medium-temperature hydrothermal conditions with low sulfur fugacity, consistent with microscopic mineral assemblages and thermodynamic simulations. Systematic δ34S variations reveal: stage II values (9.24–5‰) indicate granitic/Devonian sedimentary sources; Py L values (2.19–3.6‰) reflect mantle contributions; stage III signatures (−2.3–1.93‰) record late meteoric water mixing. Complementary δ56Fe data show that Py II (0.2–0.3‰) and Py L (0.58–0.68‰) preserve magmatic fingerprints, while negative values of Py III (−2.29 to −0.71‰) document increasing sedimentary Fe incorporation. Combined with geochronology, S-Fe isotopes, and physicochemical constraints, we propose that the Jinshan gold deposit formed in a tectonic setting transitioning from compression to extension during the Late Indosinian (ca. 237–201 Ma). Mineralization was initiated by the partial melting of the metasomatized mantle, where hydrous magmas efficiently extracted Au and volatiles. These components ascended through transcrustal faults, with Au partitioning into exsolved fluids that precipitated gold through immiscibility and boiling in secondary structures.
Keywords: lamprophyre geochronology; pyrite–arsenopyrite geochemistry; S-Fe isotopes; magmatic mineralization; Jinshan gold deposit; West Qinling metallogenic belt lamprophyre geochronology; pyrite–arsenopyrite geochemistry; S-Fe isotopes; magmatic mineralization; Jinshan gold deposit; West Qinling metallogenic belt

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Xue, Z.; Luo, J.; Ma, C.; Yan, K.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Guo, H. Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt. Geosciences 2026, 16, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208

AMA Style

Li H, Xue Z, Luo J, Ma C, Yan K, Chen L, Wang H, Yang X, Guo H. Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt. Geosciences. 2026; 16(6):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hang, Zhongkai Xue, Jianxiang Luo, Cheng Ma, Kang Yan, Li Chen, Haiyang Wang, Xutao Yang, and Haomin Guo. 2026. "Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt" Geosciences 16, no. 6: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208

APA Style

Li, H., Xue, Z., Luo, J., Ma, C., Yan, K., Chen, L., Wang, H., Yang, X., & Guo, H. (2026). Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt. Geosciences, 16(6), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop