Next Article in Journal
Isotopic and Geochemical Features of High-Hafnium Zircons of the Vasin-Mylk LCT Pegmatite, Kola Peninsula: Compositional Zoning and Crystallization Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Uppermost Crustal Anisotropy in the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia: Implications for Geothermal Exploration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Paleontology Geoheritage of the Kaliningrad Region, South-East Baltic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Manifestations of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake as Geoheritage: Geological Processes, Landscape Impacts, and Implications for Geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas

by
Mustapha El Hamidy
1 and
Károly Németh
2,3,4,*
1
Geodynamics and Geomatic Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali University, B.P. 20, El Jadida 24000, Morocco
2
Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary
3
School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
4
Saudi Geological Survey, Jeddah 21514, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2026, 16(2), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020076
Submission received: 9 January 2026 / Revised: 3 February 2026 / Accepted: 8 February 2026 / Published: 10 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Research Trends of Geoheritage and Geoconservation)

Abstract

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake (Mw 6.7–6.9) is the strongest quake ever recorded in modern Morocco and ranks among North Africa’s most significant seismic events of the century. It struck the High Atlas region, causing widespread land changes, thousands of landslides, destruction in remote mountain villages, and heavy losses of life and cultural heritage. The earthquake not only had immediate humanitarian and economic effects but also dramatically transformed the landscape, uncovered new geological features, and reshaped the region—providing a unique opportunity to study seismic activity as geoheritage. Researchers have begun systematically documenting how this earthquake affected perceptions of seismic hazards in the High Atlas area. Although often considered a dark geoheritage, the event holds valuable lessons that can inform programs to strengthen resilience to geohazards. This research places the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake in a geoheritage context, underscoring its scientific, educational, and cultural importance. By analyzing how the earthquake altered the terrain, exposed tectonic activity, and left lasting geological marks, this work aims to bridge the gap between the high scientific interest in seismic events and their limited roles in geoheritage, conservation, tourism, and education.

1. Introduction

Earthquakes are sudden, intense ground-shaking events caused by the rapid release of energy within the Earth’s crust, generating seismic waves that propagate across the surface. Throughout human history, seismic events have ranged from moderate to catastrophic, frequently causing profound damage to infrastructure, the environment, and human communities [1,2,3,4,5]. Recent examples include major earthquakes in Colombia (1999, Mw 6.2, ~2000 victims) [6]; Haiti (2010, Mw 7.0, 222,570 victims, USD 8 billion in losses); Indonesia—Aceh (2004, Mw 9.1, 165,708 victims, USD 4.4 billion); Iran—Bam (2003, Mw 6.6, 26,976 victims, USD 0.5 billion); Pakistan (2005, Mw 7.6, 73,338 victims, USD 5.2 billion) (UNDRR); Mexico—Gulf of Tehuantepec (2017, Mw 8.2, 98 victims) [7]; Peru—Chincha Alta (2007, Mw 8.0, 519 victims) [8]; China—Wenchuan (2008, Mw 7.9, 87,476 victims, USD 85 billion) [9]; Chile (2010, Mw 8.8, 521 victims, USD 30 billion) [10]; Japan—Tohoku (2012, Mw 9.0, ~15,000 victims, USD 411 billion); Nepal (2015, Mw 7.8, ~8000 victims) [11]; and the Turkey–Syria earthquake doublet (2023, Mw 7.8 & 7.5, ~59,000 victims, ~USD 118 billion in losses) [12].
Globally, earthquakes are among the most severe natural hazards and among the leading causes of disaster-related mortality. According to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), earthquakes caused the highest number of disaster-related deaths between 2000 and 2019, and in 2023 alone—following major events in Türkiye–Syria, Morocco, and Afghanistan—earthquakes accounted for the most fatalities worldwide. These impacts often extend beyond the immediate shaking, triggering secondary hazards such as landslides, ground failures, or, in coastal settings, tsunamis, further amplifying human and environmental vulnerability. For example, the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake in Indonesia generated a tsunami affecting Palu, Donggala, and Mamuju, and produced long-distance flow slides on gentle slopes, resulting in 2101 deaths, 4438 injuries, and 1373 missing persons [13,14,15,16]. Likewise, the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China triggered widespread landslides, rock avalanches, debris flows, and landslide-dammed lakes, with preliminary estimates indicating approximately 20,000 deaths from these secondary hazards [17,18,19].
Beyond physical destruction, earthquakes can disrupt essential services, including water supply, sanitation, healthcare, and housing, as well as critical lifelines, including energy grids, communication networks, and transportation systems. Overcrowded shelters, damaged infrastructure, and reduced access to clean water and other resources can increase the risk of disease outbreaks and long-term socioeconomic instability. These cascading effects underscore that earthquakes are not merely geophysical phenomena but complex events with profound human, cultural, and territorial consequences.
Although earthquakes are scientifically significant, they have seldom been studied from a geoheritage perspective, in part because seismic events are typically understood as sudden and destructive geological hazards rather than as legacy features of the landscape. Earthquakes often produce dramatic impacts that communities prioritize rebuilding and recovery for—especially where low-resistance building materials are used, populations are dense, or geoeducation and hazard resilience are limited—so physical traces of these events are quickly removed or obscured during reconstruction, reducing opportunities for their preservation as geoheritage elements [20,21]. In this sense, earthquakes can be considered a form of “dark geoheritage”, in which the tangible evidence of past disasters is neither preserved nor valorised, partly because societal responses focus on healing and rebuilding rather than on conserving the physical record of destruction [21]. This contrasts with other geological features that are more visibly appreciated and interpreted as heritage, illustrating a significant gap in how geoheritage frameworks account for hazardous, transient, and socially sensitive geological phenomena. Tectonic activity—such as faulting, folding, crustal uplift, and seismic deformation—is central to tectonic geoheritage, yet its heritage importance is often overlooked. Most previous geoheritage research associated with natural disasters has primarily focused on volcanic hazards [22,23,24,25,26], volcano tourism [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], tsunamis [35,36] and landslides [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], giving little attention to how seismic landscapes could contribute to geoconservation, education, risk awareness, and resilience-building. Characterisation of the volcanic geoheritage of Morocco is also an emerging subject that many researchers have explored recently [46,47,48]. This oversight is notable since earthquakes frequently produce, modify, or remove landforms and geosites, leaving lasting geological records that reveal the Earth’s ongoing changes.
Morocco offers a compelling context for examining seismic risk and its geoheritage implications. Although located south of the most active Mediterranean collision zones, the country has been repeatedly struck by destructive earthquakes throughout its history, with documented events dating back to the 9th century [49,50,51]. In modern times, the Al Haouz earthquake is the third-deadliest seismic disaster of the past decades, following the 1960 Agadir earthquake (Mw 5.8), which caused more than 12,000 fatalities [52,53], and the 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake (Mw 6.4), which resulted in over 800 fatalities, 2539 destroyed and damaged houses, and 15,600 individuals being homeless [54,55,56]. Moroccan seismicity is primarily influenced by the complex interactions between the African and Eurasian plates, along with an extensive network of active faults—many characterized by strike-slip or reverse motion—resulting from lithospheric thinning, mantle uplift, and ongoing intraplate deformation within the Atlas orogenic belt. This geodynamic setting underscores the ongoing, and sometimes underestimated, risk of significant, potentially destructive earthquakes, emphasizing the need for a thorough understanding of seismic processes and their impacts on Morocco’s evolving landscapes.
Within this broader history, the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake (Mw 6.7–6.9) is the most powerful earthquake recorded in modern Moroccan history and among the most consequential seismic disasters of the 21st century in North Africa. Striking the High Atlas region, it caused extensive ground deformation, triggered thousands of landslides, devastated remote mountain settlements, and resulted in major loss of life and heritage. Beyond its immediate humanitarian and economic impacts, the earthquake profoundly altered landscapes, exposed previously unknown geological structures, and reshaped the region’s geomorphology—offering a rare opportunity to explore seismic phenomena as geoheritage.
This study situates the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake within a geoheritage framework, highlighting the scientific, educational, and cultural significance of seismic landscapes. By examining how the earthquake reshaped the terrain, revealed tectonic processes, and left enduring geological imprints, this work addresses the critical gap between the high scientific value of seismic events and their limited use in geoheritage, geoconservation, geotourism, and geoeducation. In doing so, it also contributes to broader discussions on disaster memory, risk awareness, and community resilience in Morocco and beyond.

2. Materials and Methods

This paper adopts an analytical narrative approach to examine the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake and its implications for geoheritage, geodiversity, and geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas. The study first outlines the High Atlas’s unique geotectonic setting, emphasizing the region’s intracontinental orogenic evolution, active fault systems, and ongoing intraplate deformation. This context is essential for understanding why seismic processes play such an important role in shaping both the physical landscape and the region’s geoheritage.
A narrative synthesis is then developed to reconstruct the seismic event of 8 September 2023, drawing on the current state of geophysical and geological knowledge. Because research on the earthquake is ongoing, information on rupture mechanisms, surface deformation, mass movements, and landscape impacts continues to evolve. In this dynamic scientific context, an expert, step-by-step analysis is provided to highlight the distinctive geological signatures and geomorphological consequences of the earthquake, with a focus on features with potential geoheritage relevance.
We used VOSviewer_1.6.20 and the Scopus database to map research outputs and identify major research clusters. Scopus is one of the major research output databases, primarily collecting English-language scientific literature appearing in globally significant research journals. Here, we consider this database a robust, relatively easy-to-use data source for examining global research trends, while noting that it does not list research outputs published in books, in grey literature (not listed in Scopus), or in languages other than English. It has limitations. For identifying the general global trend, however, it is currently the best data source, and the results indeed demonstrate clustering and networking in global research output. We used search terms such as “(TITLE-ABS-KEY (geoheritage) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (earthquake) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (tectonic) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (fault) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (fold) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (seismicity))” with a minimum number of 5 word co-occurrences within Abstract and Title of the located articles to identify global research output in the field of geoheritage and the most relevant structural geology markers. This search yielded 210 research papers, providing a good database for identifying global research trends (Figure 1).
To identify relevant Moroccan research outputs, two sets of searches were performed: “(TITLE-ABS-KEY (geoheritage) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (Morocco))” and “(TITLE-ABS-KEY (earthquake) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (Morocco))”. The “earthquake” and “Morocco” search returned 415 papers, indicating vigorous research activity and interest in these subjects (Figure 2a). The geoheritage and Morocco searches returned only 50 research outputs, indicating that this field is emerging in Morocco (Figure 2b).
To situate the earthquake within a broader geoconservation and geoheritage context, the paper integrates insights from published studies of High Atlas geodiversity, including 42 research contributions identified through Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar using the following search terms: “(TITLE-ABS-KEY (geoheritage) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (High Atlas) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (Morocco) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (geodiversity) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (geoconservation) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (geotourisme) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (geosite) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (geomorphosite))”. Given the heterogeneity of available data and the rapid post-event landscape transformations, a conventional systematic review was deemed inappropriate. Instead, the study employs a comparative narrative that draws on analogous seismic events worldwide to contextualize the types of landforms and stratigraphic records that major earthquakes can imprint on the geomorphological and geological archive.
This methodology provides a comprehensive interpretation of the Al Haouz earthquake as both a destructive geodynamic event and a generator or modifier of geoheritage features (Figure 3). The approach underscores the need for holistic, interdisciplinary perspectives—combining seismology, geomorphology, heritage studies, and community knowledge—to fully understand the earthquake’s implications for geodiversity, geotourism, and long-term landscape evolution in the High Atlas.

3. Geological and Tectonic Context of the High Atlas

The High Atlas is an intracontinental mountain belt formed by the inversion of a Mesozoic aborted rift during the Cenozoic Alpine Orogeny [57]. With peaks exceeding 4000 m, it is the highest segment of the North African Alpine system, which is an active seismic zone with notable large magnitude earthquakes (M4.5+) (Figure 3). Crustal shortening began in the Late Cretaceous [58] and intensified during the Neogene [59,60,61], producing flexural loading that led to the formation of discontinuous syn-orogenic basins. These include the El Haouz, Bahira, and Tadla basins to the north, and the Souss and Ouarzazate basins to the south [59] (Figure 4). The southern basins are delimited by the crustal-scale South Atlas Fault (Figure 4), a major structure that separates the High and Anti-Atlas domains [62,63,64]. This reverse fault extends northeastward and reactivates the steeply dipping Tizi n’Test Fault [65]. To the north, the Western High Atlas is bounded by the North Atlas Fault, which marks the transition to the Mio-Pliocene El Haouz basin [66] (Figure 4). Farther north, the south-dipping North Jebilet Fault places the Jebilet inlier over the Neogene Bahira plain [67]. Alpine deformation is characterized by thick-skinned folding and thrusting in the Western High Atlas [67], progressively evolving into thin-skinned tectonics toward the external forelands [66,68,69] (Figure 4).

4. Results

4.1. Research Output Pattern

The complex geological and tectonic evolution has directly generated exceptional geodiversity across lithologic, structural, geomorphologic, and paleontological dimensions. This diversity is expressed in the remarkable density and variety of rock types within a relatively small area, including Triassic volcanic and sedimentary units, Jurassic carbonate platforms, Bathonian–Callovian red beds, and extensive magmatic intrusions such as gabbroic and doleritic dykes and sills (e.g., Imilchil, Tassent, and Msadrid ridges) [57,69,70,71,72]. Strong polyphase deformation has further exposed these formations in narrow anticlines, broad synclines, and fault-bounded blocks, allowing the simultaneous visibility of multiple stratigraphic levels and tectonic structures—an uncommon feature in the High Atlas [57,69,70,71,72,73,74]. In addition, the region hosts internationally significant paleontological sites, including diverse dinosaur track assemblages, crocodylomorph traces, and invertebrate ichnofossils, adding another layer to its exceptional geodiversity [75,76,77,78].
Research on geoheritage is an emerging field in Morocco, as a Scopus survey identified 50 scientific papers, most published within the last 20 years (Figure 2b). Although 50 research outputs are not yet a robust database for clearly identifying trends, they are sufficient to note that geosite recognition and inventory building are the main research priorities so far in Morocco’s geoheritage context. In contrast, earthquake or seismic research is far more established in the Moroccan context (Figure 2a). There are significant clusters in building stability, tsunamis, and general geological aspects of various structural elements, which are key research output clusters. In the global scene, 210 research papers were identified as relevant to some form of structural geology research in the context of geoheritage, suggesting that earthquake heritage remains a relatively restricted research subject (Figure 2a).
Uplift, folding, faulting, and salt tectonics have exposed sedimentary, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks in a spatially condensed area, creating diverse landscapes such as high plateaus, incised valleys, canyons, karst systems, and volcanic edifices. Tectonic activity has also brought extensive fossiliferous strata to the surface, revealing dinosaur tracks [75,76,77,78], Carboniferous paleoflora [79], and other significant paleontological sites. Such structural and stratigraphic heterogeneity underpins the scientific, educational, and aesthetic value of the High Atlas geosites. The richness of geodiversity is reflected in the volume and diversity of research conducted in the region. Based on a review of international academic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar), 42 peer-reviewed studies (Table 1) have catalogued, evaluated, and promoted geomorphosites, structural sites, and paleontological remains, particularly in the Central High Atlas and the M’Goun UNESCO Global Geopark [80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90] (Table 1). Other studies have addressed the potential of geotourism and geo-education, highlighting the link between geoconservation, sustainable development, and local socioeconomic benefits [85,91,92,93,94,95]. Advanced methods, including GIS-based mapping, multi-criteria assessment, and machine learning, have been increasingly applied to identify and promote geosites [96,97,98,99,100]. The convergence of these studies demonstrates that the High Atlas is not only a repository of geological and geomorphological wealth but also one of the most intensively studied regions in Morocco, reinforcing its status as a flagship area for geoconservation, geoeducation, and sustainable geotourism initiatives (Figure 5, Table 1).
Table 1. This overview summarizes peer-reviewed studies from the High Atlas, based on a review of international academic databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. An earlier review of the geoheritage research landscape [101] identified a significant body of work across the broader Moroccan region. Initial research indicated that most studies focused on the Atlas region and paid little attention to earthquakes or the concept of “dark geoheritage.” This table offers an updated and comprehensive summary of geoheritage research, building upon previous evaluations [101].
Table 1. This overview summarizes peer-reviewed studies from the High Atlas, based on a review of international academic databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. An earlier review of the geoheritage research landscape [101] identified a significant body of work across the broader Moroccan region. Initial research indicated that most studies focused on the Atlas region and paid little attention to earthquakes or the concept of “dark geoheritage.” This table offers an updated and comprehensive summary of geoheritage research, building upon previous evaluations [101].
Authors (Year)TitleMajor Findings
Enniouar et al. (2014) [75]A Middle Jurassic Sauropod Tracksite in the Argana Basin, Western High Atlas, Morocco: An Example of Paleoichnological Heritage for Sustainable GeotourismThe authors highlight the significant scientific and tourist importance of a Middle Jurassic site in the Tafaytour region (Argana Basin, Morocco) that contains tracks of six large sauropod dinosaurs, as well as its potential to enhance local geotourism initiatives.
Bourchich et al. (2015) [102]Geotourism in Ida Outananes, Moroccan Western High Atlas: State of Valuation and Opportunity for ImprovementThe assessment of the Ida Outanane area indicates deterioration that jeopardizes its Geosystems, Ecosystems, and tourist appeal. This decline is attributable to the opening of the area to tourism without a management plan that integrates geopreservation efforts with sustainable funding.
Bouzekraoui et al. (2018a) [82] Inventory and Assessment of Geomorphosites for Geotourism Development: A Case Study of Aït Bou Oulli Valley (Central High-Atlas, Morocco) The project entailed inventorying, selecting, and quantitatively evaluating outstanding geomorphosites to classify them. The findings identify 81 potential sites, of which 24 are appropriate for geotourism. These suitable locations comprise nine fluvial landforms—five offering scenic vantage points and four being karst forms—along with four structural landforms, three glacial landforms, two gravity landforms, one anthropogenic landform, and one lacustrine landform.
Bouzekraoui et al. (2018b) [81] Mapping Geoheritage for Geotourism Management, a Case Study of Aït Bou Oulli Valley in Central High-Atlas (Morocco) This study focuses on creating a new geotourism map of the Aït Bou Oulli Valley through digital mapping tools and fieldwork. The map features geosites and high-mountain landscapes, providing an overview of the valley’s geoheritage. It also includes information about tourist infrastructures to assist visitors. Additionally, the map emphasizes the valley’s geodiversity and aims to promote geotourism by establishing three new geo-hiking trails.
Bouzekraoui et al. (2018c) [80]Mapping Geosites as Gateways to the Geotourism Management in Central High-Atlas (Morocco)This article outlines three geotourism routes showcasing the key geosites in the rural Demnate and Upper Tessaout valleys. These itineraries help explain the regions’ significant potential as tourist attractions.
Achkir (2018) [103] An Asset for Integrated Geotourism (Case of Assif Melloul Crossing (Common Territorial of Anergui and Tillouguite) in the Province of Azilal; Béni Mellal-Khénifra-Region/Morocco)This article reports the initial findings from a survey of geomorphosites in the rural communes of Anergui and Tillouguite. It also seeks to improve strategies for the protection, promotion, and management of these geomorphosites, with the aim of integrating them into sustainable development. This approach offers new incentives and opportunities for sustainable tourism, positioning geo-tourism as a leading frontier.
Amine et al. (2018) [76]Inventory and Management of Dinosaurs Traces: A Case Study of Azilal Region, MoroccoThis work contributes to the preservation and promotion of dinosaur-track deposits by detailing the geology and geomorphology of the Azilal area, developing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) maps, and proposing models for their enhancement and protection.
Ait Omar et al. (2019) [83]Nouvelle Méthodologie d’inventaire et D’évaluation des Géomorphosites dans le Contexte du Géoparc M’goun (Maroc)This article presents a new methodology for inventorying and assessing geomorphosites within the M’goun Regional Geopark. The approach was tested on two geomorphosites—Ain Asserdoune and Canyon Moudj—located within the geopark, specifically south of the town of Béni Mellal in Morocco.
Amine et al. (2020) [77]Dinosaurs Footprints of the High Atlas Morocco by Using Geological Heritage Information SystemThis work contributes to the preservation and protection of dinosaur track deposits by using geographic information to describe and map the study area and, ultimately, to propose models for the development and conservation of these geosites.
Arrad et al. (2020a) [92]From Geoheritage Inventory to Geoeducation and Geotourism Implications: Insight from Jbel Amsittene (Essaouira Province, Morocco)This document presents an initial, detailed analysis of Jbel Amsittene’s geoheritage, combining quantitative and qualitative evaluations of its geological and geomorphological sites to highlight their significance and support geoconservation efforts.
Arrad et al. (2020b) [91]Inventory, Evaluation, and Promotion of the Essaouira Province Geoheritage (Morocco): Toward a Local and Socio-Economic Sustainable DevelopmentThis work aims to inventory, assess, and promote key geodiversity features in Essaouira that remain unknown or underutilized for conservation and development.
Lkebir et al. (2020) [78]The Anza Tracksite: Ichnological Heritage and Geoeducational Significance of Dinosaur and Pterosaur Tracks in Coastal MoroccoThe authors highlight the scientific, geo-educational, and ichnological significance of the Anza site and emphasize the need for a strategy to conserve and safeguard it.
Rais et al. (2021) [104]Geological Heritage in the M’Goun Geopark: A Proposal of Geo-Itineraries Around the Bine El Ouidane Dam (Central High Atlas, Morocco)This work seeks to identify and select exceptional geosites within the Bine El Ouidane Lake region and to propose itineraries that promote this mountainous area.
El Alami et al. (2021) [105]Biodiversity, An Essential Component for The M’Goun Global Geopark Development (Morocco)—An OverviewThis article aimed to assess the inventory and development of geosites, wildlife diversity, biodiversity conservation, human–carnivore conflict, and the management of endangered species in the M’goun Global Geopark within Morocco’s central High Atlas.
Elkaichi et al. (2021) [106]Quantitative Assessment of the Geodiversity of M’Goun UNESCO Geopark, Central High Atlas (Morocco)This article quantitatively evaluates geodiversity in the M’Goun UNESCO Geopark through two approaches. Both methods reveal the richness and spatial distribution of geodiversity elements within the geopark. Additionally, they identify areas with high geodiversity indices, offering useful insights for geopark managers to develop effective geoconservation strategies.
Ait Omar et al. (2021) [84]Les Géopatrimoines de la Partie Nord-Est du Géoparc Régional du M’Goun (Maroc): Représentations Sociales et Valorisation GéotouristiqueThis article aims to identify geosites with strong social reputations in the northeastern part of the M’Goun Regional Geopark, based on a questionnaire survey that elicited local stakeholders’ social perceptions. The identified geosites have also been assessed. Additionally, the study examines the role of local associations in promoting geotourism and geoconservation.
Ait Barka et al. (2022a) [107]The Geosite of Travertine Waterfall of El Ksiba (Morocco), A Heritage to Enhancement and PreserveIn this work, the authors outlined strategies to boost and safeguard the El Ksiba travertines as a part of rural socio-economic development, focusing on geotourism and geoeducation initiatives.
Ait Barka et al. (2022b) [108]The Karst Landscapes of Beni Mellal Atlas (Central Morocco): Identification for Promoting Geoconservation and TourismThe authors detail the study area’s wide variety of karst features and processes, including caves, dolines, underground watercourses, and Karren, along with its biological and cultural diversity. This region has strong potential to develop into an appealing area and a significant economic resource for the local community through sustainable development.
Louz et al. (2022) [86]Geological Heritage of the Taguelft Syncline (M’Goun Geopark): Inventory, Assessment, and Promotion for Geotourism Development (Central High Atlas, Morocco)This study seeks to document and assess the geological heritage of the Taguelft syncline, located south of Béni Mellal, and to promote geotourism and geodidactic initiatives to support its sustainable geoconservation.
Ait Omar et al. (2022a) [85]A Quantitative method for Inventory and Assessment of Geoheritage in the Mountains of Morocco: A Case Study of the Tagleft Syncline in Beni Mellal AtlasThe paper introduces a quantitative approach for identifying and assessing geological and geomorphological sites, applied specifically to the Tagleft syncline in the Beni Mellal Atlas, Morocco.
Ait Omar et al. (2022b) [109]Contribution of Social Perception for Identifying Geomorphological Potential and Touristic Practices in the North-Eastern part of the M’Goun Regional Geopark, MoroccoThe paper introduces a quantitative approach for identifying and assessing geological and geomorphological sites, applied specifically to the Tagleft syncline in the Beni Mellal Atlas, Morocco.
Aichi et al. (2022a) [110]Cultural Heritage in Imghranes Massif (Drâa-Tafilalet Region, Morocco): An Optimist’s Contribution and Opportunity for the Local People and Sustainable TourismThe authors highlight the rich geological, archaeological, and cultural heritage of the Imghranes massif (Drâa-Tafilalet region, Morocco), emphasizing its potential for geotourism, geoeducation, and cultural tourism.
Aichi et al. (2022b) [111]From Geoheritage to Geoeducation and Geotourism: The Imghranes Massif, Drâa-Tafilalet Region, MoroccoThis work presents the first detailed analysis of geoheritage in the Imghranes area of the central High Atlas of Morocco. It includes both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of its geosites and geomorphosites to highlight their significance and support geoconservation efforts.
Bussard et al. (2022) [112]Les Paysages Géomorphologiques du Haut Atlas Central (Maroc): Potentiel Educatif et Eléments pour la Médiation ScientifiqueThis article explores the educational opportunities offered by the eight geomorphological landscapes within the M’Goun UNESCO Global Geopark in the Central High Atlas, Morocco.
Bussard (2022) [93]Heritage Value and Didactic Potential of Geomorphological Landscapes: the Case of Eight Sites in the Central High Atlas (Morocco)The authors highlight the educational value of eight geomorphological landscapes within the M’Goun Geopark (Central High Atlas, Morocco). These sites are of significant scientific interest and have the potential to promote geotourism.
Bussard (2023) [94]Geomorphological Landscapes of the M’Goun Geopark (Morocco): Potential for Geotourism and Local Guides’ PerspectiveThis study explores the potential for geotourism within the geomorphological landscapes of the M’Goun Global Geopark, Morocco. It emphasizes site selection based on educational value and local guides’ perspectives. Eight key landscapes are identified for interpretation, considering their visibility and complexity. Interviews with guides reveal a strong interest in geomorphology and palaeontology, despite limited familiarity with specific geological terms. The findings stress the crucial role of guides in conveying geological information and highlight the need for effective interpretation methods to boost geotourism.
Elkaichi et al. (2023) [96]Evaluation of Geotouristic Station Suitability Using GIS-Based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of the M’Goun UNESCO Geopark, High Atlas (Morocco)The study employs a multi-criteria decision-making approach that integrates AHP and GIS to identify suitable sites for geotourism stations within the M’Goun UNESCO Geopark. It assesses natural features, landscape quality, and safety factors, creating a synthesis map that supports local authorities in planning and managing geotourism activities in the geopark.
El Khalki et al. (2023) [113]M’Goun UNESCO Geopark (Central High Atlas, Morocco), a Lever for Sustainable and Integrated Territorial Development: What Approach to Adopt?This study aims to highlight Morocco’s rich geodiversity and to explore the potential for establishing geoparks to enhance geotourism, environmental awareness, and local socioeconomic development. It highlights the M’Goun UNESCO Geopark as a prime example of sustainable regional development, showing how geoparks can foster economic growth, generate employment, and support traditional crafts. As Africa and the Arab world’s first geopark, M’Goun exemplifies how geopark initiatives can benefit rural and mountain communities through integrated geotourism strategies.
Louz et al. (2023) [87]Inventory and Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites of the Ait Attab Syncline (M’Goun Unesco Geopark, Morocco) to Stimulate Geoconservation, Geotourism and Sustainable DevelopmentThe Ait Attab syncline in the Moroccan Central High Atlas is a region of high geodiversity, with substantial geological, palaeogeographical, and cultural significance. An inventory identified 8 geosites and 11 geodiversity sites, emphasizing their scientific and educational value and potential for geotourism development. Most sites are subject to medium degradation risk, while palaeontological and magmatic sites are at high risk.
Si Mhamdi et al. (2023) [95]Enhancing the Geological Heritage of the Errachidia Area in the High Atlas, Morocco: Inventory and a Proposal for a Pedagogic and Geotouristic TrailThe study introduces a pedagogical and geotouristic trail in Errachidia province, Morocco, renowned for its geological formations and mineral resources. It highlights nine important geosites, encompassing structural, stratigraphic, paleontological, and geomorphological features, each offering considerable scientific, educational, and tourism benefits. The trail’s goal is to boost education and tourism via guided walks and informational signage, while fostering geotourism and supporting local socio-economic growth.
Bouzekraoui
et al. (2024) [114]
La Carte Géotouristique des Communes de Foum El Ancer et Taghzirt Comme Moyen de Valorisation Géotouristique, Atlas de Béni Mellal, (Maroc)This study examines the geotourism potential of the communes Foum El Ancer and Taghzirt in Béni Mellal province, situated at the base of the Middle Atlas. It identifies multiple geosites formed through magmatic, sedimentary, structural, and geomorphological processes. The goal is to develop a geotourism map that showcases and promotes these geosites, which hold considerable promise for boosting geotourism and enhancing the region’s geoheritage and tourism development.
Elkaichi et al. (2024) [97]Canyons as Potential Geotourism Attractions of Central High Atlas, Morocco: Comparative Analysis of Aït Bouguemaz Valley and Zaouiat Ahnsal-Taghia valley by Using GAM ModelThe study evaluates two popular geo-destinations in the Moroccan Central High Atlas: Aït Bouguemaz and Zaouiat Ahansal-Taghia valleys, using the Geosite Assessment Model (GAM). Aït Bouguemaz shows high principal scores (9.75) and moderate additional scores (8.25), while Ahansal-Taghia has moderate principal scores (8) and lower additional scores (5.25). Despite their strong scientific and aesthetic appeal, both sites require improvements in functional and tourism-related aspects, particularly in management, planning, and infrastructure, to enhance geotourism.
Naimi et al. (2024) [98]Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms to identify Potential Geosites for Geotourism Promotion in Ziz Upper Watershed in Southeastern MoroccoThis study aims to identify the optimal locations for geomorphosites in the Ziz Upper Watershed (ZUW), southeastern Morocco, using machine learning classifiers (MLCs) to enhance geotourism. A detailed inventory of 120 geomorphosites was compiled, and the Bagging algorithm was used to create a predictive model with an AUC of 0.935. The model identified highly suitable areas covering approximately 12% of the region, primarily in the western part, with mountainous terrain and high elevations. These results provide useful insights for decision-makers to enhance the discovery of geomorphosites and promote geotourism development.
Ouacha et al. (2024) [115]Geological Sites of the Anergui Region: Description and Place in the Alpine Geological History of the M’Goun UNESCO Global Geopark (Morocco)This study details 16 key geosites within the M’Goun UNESCO Global Geopark in Morocco, emphasizing their scientific, educational, and geotourism importance. These sites highlight the region’s geodiversity and provide insights into major geological phases, including the extension of the High Atlas basin, carbonate platform formation, magmatic activity, and uplift during the Tertiary and Quaternary periods. The objective is to enhance the geopark’s collection of geosites and foster greater geological awareness locally.
Wakass et al. (2025) [116]Geosites of High Atlas of Marrakech (Morocco): Geological Characterization, Accessibility, and Potential Interests for Sustainable TourismThis study reviews four potential geosites in Morocco’s High Atlas, emphasizing their geological features, historical significance, and accessibility. The sites, such as Toubkal National Park and Ifni Lake, are reachable via well-maintained roads and are equipped with tourism amenities. The study suggests additional research to better develop the geosites for sustainable tourism.
El Ouali et al. (2025a) [90]Geosites and Geodiversity Sites of the Tinghir–Dades–Imilchil Area, Morocco: Toward Conservation, Education, and Tourism DevelopmentThe research examined 25 geological sites in the Tinghir-Dades-Imilchil region, emphasizing their scientific, educational, and tourism value. The assessment aimed to encourage geotourism and environmental awareness, focusing on preserving and enhancing the area’s geological heritage to support sustainable growth.
El Ouali et al. (2025b) [89]Quantitative Assessment and Enhancement of 12 Sites of Geological Interest South of Midelt City (Tizi N’Talghemt, Central High Atlas, Morocco)This research highlights twelve geological sites in the Tizi N’Talghemt region of Morocco’s Central High Atlas, focusing on their scientific, educational, and tourism value. It identifies four Geosites with high scientific importance and eight Geodiversity sites with notable potential. The study stresses the importance of safeguarding these sites and aligns with the Moroccan National Program for Geology MNPG-2030 and UNESCO guidelines to conserve the region’s geological heritage and support sustainable development.
Louz et al. (2025) [88]Identification of Potential Areas for the Development of Geotourism in the Northern Part of the M’Goun Geopark (Morocco) Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and SigThe study evaluates the geotourism potential of the unexplored portion of the M’Goun Regional Geopark in the Moroccan High Atlas using GIS and AHP. It identifies key geosites with high potential, such as the Ouzoud waterfalls and the Ait Attab syncline, thereby emphasizing regions with notable geodiversity. The findings provide a strategic guide for advancing geotourism and effectively managing the geopark.
Elfaiz et al. (2025) [117]Inventory and Assessment of the Geoheritage Potential of the Imilchil District (Central High Atlas, Morocco)The Imilchil region in the Moroccan Central High Atlas is renowned for its diverse geology, hydrogeology, and geomorphology, and features notable geosites, including dinosaur fossils and magmatic rocks. The study underscores the area’s scientific, educational, and tourism significance and emphasizes the need for a preservation plan to safeguard these geosites from potential deterioration.
Kchikach et al. (2025) [100]Digital Promotion of Geoheritage Along a Tourist Route in M’Goun UNESCO Geopark (Central High Atlas, Morocco) and Visitor Typology AnalysisThis study assesses the tourism potential of the M’Goun UNESCO Global Geopark in Morocco’s central High Atlas, employing an experiential approach to evaluate the area’s natural heritage. It highlights five main factors influencing destination choice and categorizes four different visitor groups based on statistical analysis. An interactive map was developed and shared online to showcase the region’s geoheritage. The results are intended to support tourism management by enabling local authorities to more effectively allocate resources and plan land use.
Manaouch et al. (2025) [99]Enhancing Geotourism in Southeastern Morocco Through Machine Learning-Based Geomorphosite IdentificationThe study assesses three machine learning classifiers—Random Forest, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and M5 Prime—aimed at mapping potential geomorphosites in Ziz, southeast Morocco, to promote geotourism. After cataloging 120 geomorphosites, the Multi-Layer Perceptron outperformed the other models, achieving an area under the curve of 0.91. It identified highly suitable regions, covering 60% of the area, mostly in the western mountainous zone. This research provides a useful tool for decision-makers, facilitating the discovery of geomorphosites while saving time and reducing costs.
Ait Haddou et al. (2025) [79]Late Carboniferous Paleoflora of El Menizla Formation (Argana Corridor, Morocco): Implications for Geotourism and GeoconservationThis research explores the Late Pennsylvanian paleoflora of the El Menizla Formation in Morocco’s Argana Corridor, indicating a warm, humid environment with seasonal dryness. The fossil collection holds significant scientific, educational, and touristic importance, enhancing the site’s prospects for geotourism and geoconservation. The El Menizla area is proposed as a central feature of a geopark, fostering geological heritage and supporting local communities.

4.2. The 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake: Processes and Impacts

On 8 September 2023, at 11:11 p.m. local time, a severe earthquake struck the High Atlas Mountains near the town of Oukaïmedene in western Morocco, with its epicenter located in the rural commune of Ighil, approximately 72 km southwest of Marrakech (Figure 6). This seismic event, locally known as the Al Haouz earthquake, represents the strongest instrumentally recorded earthquake in Morocco to date, with a magnitude of 6.8–7.2 and a focal depth estimated between 10.7 and 27 km depending on the reporting agency (USGS, EMSC, Moroccan National Institute of Geophysics). A significant aftershock of Mw 5.7 occurred twenty minutes later, followed by a series of smaller aftershocks that characterized the post-seismic sequence.
The earthquake struck a region traditionally considered low-seismicity, making it one of the deadliest natural disasters in Morocco in decades [118,119,120,121,122,123]. The epicentral provinces most affected included Al Haouz, Taroudant, Chichaoua, Marrakech, and Ouarzazate. The event resulted in approximately 2946 fatalities, over 5500 injuries, and damage or destruction to around 60,000 houses, including 580 schools, displacing more than 500,000 people (Figure 7). Significant damage was reported in the historic Medina of Marrakech, a UNESCO World Heritage site (https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/331, accessed on 30 December 2025), with many traditional adobe and masonry structures affected, including cracks in the Koutoubia and Kasbah mosques (Figure 7). Despite the destruction, some structures, such as the Koutoubia minaret, remained standing due to reinforcement measures like steel and timber bracing. The Al Haouz earthquake occurred along a north-dipping high-angle fault, part of an orogen-scale WSW–ESE transpressional shear zone in the High Atlas. The region’s tectonic evolution is primarily governed by oblique convergence of tectonic plates, while asthenospheric upwelling plays a minor role. The rupture extended unusually deep, reaching up to 25 km, beyond typical seismogenic depths, and produced intense shaking with a maximum macroseismic intensity of MMI IX in the epicentral area, gradually decreasing to MMI VI–VII in Marrakech ([124]; https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000kufc/dyfi/intensity) (accessed on 25 September 2025). Ground deformation included tectonic uplift of up to 20 cm along the axial zone due to reactivation of compressive faults, low-displacement gravitational movements on medium to steep slopes composed mainly of Paleozoic and Upper Cretaceous rocks, and rapid gravitational movements, including rockfalls, cliff collapses, and boulder falls, particularly in metamorphic, magmatic, and limestone formations. The complex geological structure and rugged topography amplified seismic effects. Steep slopes, ridgelines, and fractured rock masses contributed to localized focusing of seismic energy, while sedimentary basins and resonance effects increased ground motion in some areas. The spatial distribution of landslides and rockfalls was strongly influenced by slope geometry, fault density, and rock mass fragmentation. The earthquake caused widespread structural damage, particularly in rural settlements at the foothills of the High Atlas, such as Amizmiz, Tafeghaghte, Toufssirine, and Talat N’Yaaqoub (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Satellite and field observations reveal extensive destruction, including nearly complete levelling of villages like Tafeghaghte and Imi N’Tala (Figure 6), where rockfalls caused more than 80 fatalities. In urban areas such as Marrakech, damage patterns included collapse or overturning of façade walls, exacerbated by weak interfaces between adobe and stone masonry, cracks along walls and arches in historic mosques, including Koutoubia and Kasbah mosques, often stabilized with steel and timber bracing, and damage to minarets due to their slender structure, leading to vertical and sub-horizontal cracking at the interface with mosque structures. The earthquake triggered numerous co-seismic gravitational movements, with failure mechanisms controlled by high slope gradients that increase downslope forces. These fractured and weak lithologies facilitate the detachment of rock blocks and topographic amplification, which focus seismic energy along ridges and slopes (Figure 8). Mapping these movements using slope analysis, fault networks, and field inventories revealed that most failures initiated near ridgelines and fault intersections, highlighting the interplay between the morpho-structural setting and the distribution of seismic energy. These observations are consistent with prior studies linking seismic shaking, slope instability, and landslide hazard in high-relief terrains [123,124,125,126,127,128,129].

4.3. Geoheritage Significance of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake constitutes a landmark event in the geoheritage history of the High Atlas, serving as both a powerful geological agent and a catalyst for the creation, modification, and destruction of geosites. With a shallow focal depth of 15–35 km [119,122,130,131] below the surface and a magnitude estimated between Mw 6.8 and 7.2, the earthquake generated a suite of co-seismic deformations that left permanent, clearly identifiable imprints on the landscape. Surface ruptures extending for more than 25 km, widespread landslides, catastrophic rockfalls, cliff collapses, and pervasive ground cracking now form a unique archive of seismic processes within a high-relief, tectonically active environment (Figure 8). These newly formed features—ranging from large landslide scars on steep Paleozoic slopes to displaced limestone blocks and uplifted strata along reactivated fault zones—illustrate the dynamic interplay between tectonics, topography, and lithology, providing rare direct evidence of earthquake mechanics expressed at the Earth’s surface. Beyond their immediate geomorphological and scientific significance, these elements carry profound implications for geoheritage. The earthquake has generated new landforms that enrich the geomorphological diversity of the region, creating tangible case studies for understanding slope instability, co-seismic mass movement, and post-seismic landscape evolution [127,132,133,134,135]. At the same time, it has altered or partially obliterated pre-existing geosites, underscoring the intrinsic fragility and non-renewable nature of geological heritage. Historical terraces, minor fault scarps, geomorphological micro-forms, and cultural–geological sites that once formed part of the local geoheritage have been displaced, buried, or erased, as also documented in other major seismic events such as the damage to cultural heritage sites following the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in southeastern Türkiye and the loss of historic structures and landscape features in the Hatay Province after the same sequence of earthquakes, highlighting the urgent need for rapid field documentation and heritage assessment in the aftermath of seismic disasters. The scientific value of the Al Haouz event is further amplified by the preservation of seismic signatures across the landscape. The spatial pattern of landslides, rockfalls, and ruptures closely corresponds to structural lineaments, lithological contrasts, and intensely fractured zones. The catastrophic failure at Imi N’Tala—where massive Upper Cretaceous limestone blocks collapsed, resulting in more than 80 fatalities—illustrates how high-relief, structurally complex terrains can record and amplify seismic energy, leaving highly diagnostic sedimentological and structural evidence. Such preserved features constitute an exceptional natural laboratory for studying earthquake-triggered gravitational processes, fault kinematics, and slope responses. Notably, the earthquake also triggered hydrogeological changes, adding a new dimension to its geoheritage significance. According to official reports presented to the Infrastructure, Energy, Mines and Environment Committee of the House of Representatives, notable variations were observed in groundwater discharge following the event [136]. Some springs showed increased flow, others decreased, and—most remarkably—new water sources appeared. Remote sensing analysis conducted in coordination with the Royal Centre for Space Remote Sensing identified 69 newly formed springs, distributed across the provinces of Al Haouz (32), Taroudant (19), Ouarzazate (10), and Chichaoua (8) [136] (Figure 9). These hydrogeological responses reveal how seismicity can reorganize subsurface water pathways, fracture permeability, and aquifer connectivity, creating new hydrological geosites that enrich the region’s geoheritage. The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake thus highlights the dual nature of seismic events: while highly destructive to buildings and cultural heritage, they simultaneously generate new natural features and scientific opportunities. Fault traces, uplifted terrains, landslide complexes, hydrological anomalies, and newly emergent springs now form part of the region’s non-renewable geoheritage, demanding careful conservation and long-term monitoring. Integrating these features into geoeducation initiatives, geotourism circuits, risk-awareness programs, and scientific research can deepen public understanding of seismic hazards and Earth dynamics, while preserving the memory and lessons of this transformative event. Ultimately, the Al Haouz earthquake demonstrates that seismic disasters are not only agents of destruction but also potent creators of geological knowledge and landscape heritage, leaving behind a legacy of features that are scientifically valuable, educationally enriching, and culturally meaningful.
Figure 7. (A,B) Google Earth images showing the Tafeghaghte area (31°11′48.16″ N, 8°13′26.02″ W) before (28 December 2022) and after the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake (9 September 2023), with visible zones of widespread structural damage. (C) Severely damaged façade of a hybrid reinforced-concrete–masonry building in Talat N’Yaaqoub (30°59′31.28″ N, 8°11′2.32″ W). (D) Close-up view of the shear failure affecting reinforced-concrete pillars at the corner of the same structure. (E) Typical vernacular stone-masonry buildings exhibiting extensive cracking and partial collapse in Amizmiz (31°12′53.06″ N, 8°14′48.87″ W). (F) Out-of-plane collapse of a traditional façade in the Medina (center) of Marrakech (31°37′53.004″ N, 7°59′12.012″ W). (G) Emergency stabilization interventions at the top of a minaret in Marrakech, and (H) Temporary perimeter bracing was installed around the Koutoubia Mosque to prevent further structural deterioration following the earthquake (31°37′28″ N, 7°59′35″ W). (All images adapted from [134].
Figure 7. (A,B) Google Earth images showing the Tafeghaghte area (31°11′48.16″ N, 8°13′26.02″ W) before (28 December 2022) and after the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake (9 September 2023), with visible zones of widespread structural damage. (C) Severely damaged façade of a hybrid reinforced-concrete–masonry building in Talat N’Yaaqoub (30°59′31.28″ N, 8°11′2.32″ W). (D) Close-up view of the shear failure affecting reinforced-concrete pillars at the corner of the same structure. (E) Typical vernacular stone-masonry buildings exhibiting extensive cracking and partial collapse in Amizmiz (31°12′53.06″ N, 8°14′48.87″ W). (F) Out-of-plane collapse of a traditional façade in the Medina (center) of Marrakech (31°37′53.004″ N, 7°59′12.012″ W). (G) Emergency stabilization interventions at the top of a minaret in Marrakech, and (H) Temporary perimeter bracing was installed around the Koutoubia Mosque to prevent further structural deterioration following the earthquake (31°37′28″ N, 7°59′35″ W). (All images adapted from [134].
Geosciences 16 00076 g007
Figure 8. Examples of rockfalls and rock collapses triggered by the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake [127]. (A,B) Google Earth imagery (19 September 2023, ten days after the event) showing cliff collapses, including a major failure blocking the road near Ighermane village, Chichaoua Province (31°8′58.71″ N; 8°26′7.50″ W) and large-scale rock detachments along adjacent slopes (31°9′11.79″ N; 8°23′57.78″ W). (C,D) Complete destruction of the village of Imi N’Tala (31°7′44.85″ N; 8°16′4.30″ W) caused by the catastrophic collapse of massive Upper Cretaceous limestone blocks, which resulted in over 80 fatalities. (E) Co-seismic rockfall crushed a vehicle along the Talat N’Yaaqoub road. (F) Co-seismic landslide with lateral displacement and associated rockfalls in the Ighil commune. (G) Rockslide, ground cracking, and road collapse in Idaghassen village.
Figure 8. Examples of rockfalls and rock collapses triggered by the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake [127]. (A,B) Google Earth imagery (19 September 2023, ten days after the event) showing cliff collapses, including a major failure blocking the road near Ighermane village, Chichaoua Province (31°8′58.71″ N; 8°26′7.50″ W) and large-scale rock detachments along adjacent slopes (31°9′11.79″ N; 8°23′57.78″ W). (C,D) Complete destruction of the village of Imi N’Tala (31°7′44.85″ N; 8°16′4.30″ W) caused by the catastrophic collapse of massive Upper Cretaceous limestone blocks, which resulted in over 80 fatalities. (E) Co-seismic rockfall crushed a vehicle along the Talat N’Yaaqoub road. (F) Co-seismic landslide with lateral displacement and associated rockfalls in the Ighil commune. (G) Rockslide, ground cracking, and road collapse in Idaghassen village.
Geosciences 16 00076 g008
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of newly emerging water sources reported after the Mw 6.8 Al Haouz earthquake. Blue markers indicate locations where springs or water discharge increased or newly appeared, as documented by the Moroccan Ministry of Equipment and Water. The yellow star marks the epicentral location, and red lines delineate provincial boundaries. Modified from SNRT News (2023) [136].
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of newly emerging water sources reported after the Mw 6.8 Al Haouz earthquake. Blue markers indicate locations where springs or water discharge increased or newly appeared, as documented by the Moroccan Ministry of Equipment and Water. The yellow star marks the epicentral location, and red lines delineate provincial boundaries. Modified from SNRT News (2023) [136].
Geosciences 16 00076 g009

5. Discussion

5.1. Challenges for Documentation, Access, and Preservation

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake has highlighted significant challenges in documenting, accessing, and preserving the newly formed and modified geoheritage of the High Atlas. One of the foremost challenges is the rapid pace of landscape change (Figure 10). The earthquake triggered widespread landslides, rockfalls, and surface ruptures, many of which continue to evolve under gravitational forces, rainfall, and seasonal weathering. This dynamic environment makes it difficult to capture accurate, long-term records of co-seismic features before they are altered or erased. The urgency of documenting these geological features is heightened by their fragility and non-renewable nature, which can lead to their loss before systematic study is undertaken.
The mountainous and rugged terrain of the High Atlas presents another substantial barrier. Many of the most dramatic earthquake-induced features, including fault scarps, cliff collapses, and landslide deposits, occur on steep slopes, narrow valleys, and remote ridgelines (Figure 10). Accessing these areas safely requires specialized equipment, local knowledge, and significant logistical effort. In several cases, villages such as Tafeghaghte, Talat N’Yaaqoub, and Imi N’Tala are in topographically challenging areas that are heavily affected by structural damage, complicating field surveys and site verification.
Technical limitations in monitoring and documenting these changes also constrain effective geoheritage preservation. While tools such as satellite imagery, drones, and DInSAR analysis provide powerful means of capturing surface deformation and slope movements, they may lack the resolution or temporal frequency needed to detect small-scale landslides, fractures, or rockfall deposits (Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13). Ground-based surveys, while more precise, are labor-intensive and constrained by accessibility and safety risks. The combination of technical and logistical limitations underscores the need for integrated, multi-method approaches to earthquake geoheritage documentation.
Safety concerns for field teams are paramount. The post-seismic environment often includes unstable slopes, loose rock masses, and residual seismic activity, creating hazards that may prevent researchers from accessing certain areas. Earthquake-induced landslide hazard is significant in the High Atlas. In addition, damaged infrastructure, collapsed roads, and disrupted communication networks limit the deployment of emergency monitoring teams and hinder the timely assessment of affected geosites.

5.2. Social Memory, Cultural Heritage, and Community Perspective

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake not only reshaped the High Atlas’s physical landscape but also profoundly affected the region’s social and cultural fabric. Unlike slow geological processes, earthquakes strike suddenly and violently, leaving collective trauma etched into the memories of affected communities. In Al Haouz, nearly 3000 fatalities and thousands of injuries created a profound social impact, fostering a shared memory of loss and resilience among survivors. This social memory contributes to the region’s intangible heritage, as experiences, narratives, and oral histories are passed down, influencing local identity and community cohesion.
Building on this, the concept of dark geocultural heritage can be applied to the Al Haouz region. This term refers to the legacy of tragic events such as earthquakes, in which geological and cultural elements are intertwined. The physical traces left behind by the earthquake, such as fault scarps and landslide deposits, are not only part of the region’s geological features but also represent the community’s experience of loss and recovery.
However, there is often tension between the desire to erase these signs of trauma and the need to preserve them for educational purposes. While rebuilding may encourage the removal of these features, keeping them could be crucial for hazard resilience education, teaching future generations about the risks posed by earthquakes and the importance of preparedness. These geosites can serve as powerful mementos of resilience, offering a way to reflect on the past while preparing for the future.
Traditional knowledge of natural hazards is crucial to shaping community responses and preparedness [137,138,139,140,141,142]. Indigenous practices, local observations of slope stability, and vernacular architectural techniques have historically guided settlement patterns in earthquake-prone areas. The Al Haouz earthquake has revealed both the strengths and vulnerabilities of these practices, highlighting where modern interventions must complement traditional knowledge to reduce future risk while respecting cultural practices.
The destruction of built heritage compounds the earthquake’s social and cultural impacts. Historic sites, mosques, and traditional dwellings—particularly in Marrakech’s Medina and villages such as Tafeghaghte and Talat N’Yaaqoub—suffered extensive damage. The collapse of adobe and rubble-stone structures, historic walls, and mosque minarets represents an irreplaceable loss of cultural heritage, with both aesthetic and symbolic significance. The damage is not merely structural but also affects community identity, as cultural landmarks anchor collective memory, local rituals, and social life.
Cultural landscapes—agricultural terraces, mountain villages, and historically significant pathways—also face risk in the post-seismic environment. Landslides, surface ruptures, and hydrologic changes threaten both the functionality and the visual character of these landscapes, undermining centuries of human–environment interaction. The earthquake underscores the interconnectedness of geological processes, human settlement, and cultural expression, revealing the fragility of heritage embedded within dynamic landscapes.
In this context, understanding the social memory and cultural dimensions of earthquake impact is essential to integrated disaster response and heritage preservation. Documenting community experiences, mapping affected cultural landscapes, and incorporating local knowledge into reconstruction and geoconservation strategies ensure that both tangible and intangible aspects of heritage are preserved. This holistic perspective emphasizes that geoheritage and cultural heritage are inseparable in regions where natural hazards shape both landforms and human societies.

5.3. Geoeducation, Risk Awareness, and Resilience

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake offers a unique opportunity to integrate seismic events into geoeducational frameworks, linking geological processes, social memory, and risk awareness. Earthquakes, as both destructive and creative forces, leave tangible traces in the landscape, including fault ruptures, landslide scars, and altered topography, which serve as direct teaching tools. By studying these co-seismic features, students, local communities, and visitors can develop a deeper understanding of tectonic processes, seismic hazards, and landscape evolution. Incorporating field-based learning in affected areas enhances experiential knowledge and connects theoretical geoscience with real-world observations. Seismic heritage can also serve as a medium for fostering community resilience. Documenting earthquake-induced damage, preserving post-seismic landforms, and mapping at-risk zones can be used in educational programs to illustrate the consequences of seismic events and the importance of preparedness. Community workshops, participatory mapping, and local training sessions enable residents to actively engage in hazard assessment, emergency planning, and reconstruction initiatives, transforming traumatic experiences into actionable knowledge. Museums, heritage centers, and interpretive signage play an essential role in mediating this educational process. For example, exhibitions in regional museums or temporary displays in affected villages can illustrate the earthquake’s geological and social impact, while virtual platforms, including online maps, 3D reconstructions, and interactive learning modules, extend access beyond the immediate region. These tools link the earthquake’s memory to broader awareness, highlighting the interplay between human vulnerability and geological processes.
By linking collective memory to education, preparedness, and resilience-building, seismic heritage becomes a resource for both scientific learning and community empowerment. Residents can gain a clearer understanding of local hazards, improve disaster response, and reinforce sustainable building practices. At the same time, geoeducational initiatives cultivate broader public appreciation for Morocco’s dynamic landscapes and the non-renewable nature of seismic geoheritage, emphasizing that knowledge of past events is essential for mitigating future risks.

5.4. Geoheritage Valorisation and Geoproduct Opportunities

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake, despite its profound human and social impacts, has created important opportunities to valorize seismic landscapes within Morocco’s geoheritage framework [80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,113,143,144,145,146,147]. The newly formed and modified landforms, including fault scarps, co-seismic landslides, displaced blocks, and surface ruptures, constitute a scientifically valuable and visually striking record of tectonic activity. These features position the High Atlas as a natural laboratory for geotourism, geoeducation, and scientific research. Designing geotourism trails that highlight these co-seismic structures can attract both national and international visitors with interests in earth sciences, natural hazards, and landscape evolution, fostering a sustainable relationship between local communities and their environment.
Community-based geoproducts offer a complementary pathway for geoheritage valorization. Local populations can develop artisanal creations, storytelling practices, guided tours, and educational materials that interpret the earthquake’s effects in accessible, culturally meaningful ways. These initiatives help transmit traditional knowledge, enhance community participation, and support alternative livelihoods in the post-disaster period.
Scientific tourism also holds significant potential. Researchers, universities, and field schools can benefit from direct access to exceptional exposures of active fault traces, landslide deposits, and freshly modified geological structures. These features offer rare opportunities to study earthquake mechanics, slope dynamics, and geomorphic responses in situ, yielding new data and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.
Notably, the earthquake occurred during the 10th International Conference on UNESCO Global Geoparks in Marrakech, offering a unique opportunity for scientists to engage directly in the aftermath of the seismic event. This alignment of a major earthquake with a geological conference provided valuable opportunities for field trips and on-site studies, exemplifying how such events can be integrated into scientific tourism and educational activities [148].
Digital geoproducts—including 3D visualizations of surface ruptures, virtual reality reconstructions of affected valleys, and interactive mobile applications—extend access to the region’s seismic heritage beyond the field. These tools enrich public understanding of seismic hazards, promote geoeducation, and enable students, researchers, and the wider public to explore the earthquake landscape through immersive digital environments.
A particularly promising initiative is the creation of an Earthquake Interpretation Center in the Al Haouz region (Figure 14). The center could combine educational exhibits, scientific information, and interactive technologies, most notably earthquake simulators, which allow visitors to safely experience the intensity and motion of real seismic events. By offering a controlled, immersive experience of earthquake tremors, the center would enhance public awareness of seismic risks and strengthen community preparedness and resilience. It could also serve as a hub for school visits, scientific outreach, and cultural interpretation, linking local knowledge with cutting-edge geoscience.
In addition to these valorisation strategies, the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake also raises the possibility of establishing a future geopark in the region. The High Atlas, with its exceptional seismic landscapes, active faults, co-seismic landforms and long-term tectonic evolution, provides a strong scientific basis for a geopark candidacy. Earthquake-related features could form a dedicated thematic axis within such a geopark, positioning seismic manifestations as key components of Morocco’s geoheritage. Embedding these elements into an institutional geopark framework would further support geotourism development, enhance community engagement, strengthen geoeducation, and contribute to long-term risk awareness and regional resilience.
Overall, the post-earthquake Al Haouz landscape offers a multidimensional opportunity to valorize geoheritage. By integrating field-based geotourism, community-driven initiatives, scientific research, digital technologies, and interpretive infrastructure, the region can transform a tragic geological event into a driver of education, economic revitalization, and sustainable heritage management. These approaches ensure that seismic events contribute not only to scientific advancement but also to local resilience, cultural continuity, and the promotion of Morocco’s exceptional geological legacy.

5.5. Turning Dark Geoheritage into Forward-Thinking Geohazard Resilience Development

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake underscores the dynamic nature of geoheritage, showing that seismic events are not only destructive but also potent agents of landscape transformation and geological learning. The earthquake created new landforms, exposed previously hidden faults, and altered existing geomorphological features, highlighting the capacity of natural hazards to generate non-renewable geological heritage. These co-seismic structures preserve a rare record of tectonic processes, offering a unique opportunity for scientific study and public education. As such, earthquakes can be seen as active contributors to the ongoing evolution of the geoheritage inventory, rather than merely threats to it.
From a geoheritage management perspective, the event reveals both opportunities and vulnerabilities. The rapid modification of the landscape, combined with the fragility of cultural and built heritage, underscores the need for timely documentation and monitoring. Remote mountainous terrain, complex topography, and accessibility challenges further complicate conservation efforts, while site-specific amplification and slope instabilities highlight the role of geomorphological factors in shaping the preservation potential of seismic features. Recognizing these challenges is crucial for developing strategies that integrate scientific observation, risk awareness, and heritage protection.
The Al Haouz earthquake also underscores the interplay between geological events and societal dimensions. Collective memory, traditional hazard knowledge, and the destruction of built heritage collectively shape local perceptions of seismic risk. Integrating this social dimension into geoheritage planning can enhance resilience and community engagement by linking awareness of seismic landscapes to preparedness strategies. Educational programs, interpretive signage, and digital platforms can bridge scientific understanding with public consciousness, transforming earthquake-impacted landscapes into tools for learning, awareness, and cultural continuity.
Policy implications are substantial. Effective geoconservation must recognize earthquakes as both destructive and creative forces, promoting rapid assessment of affected sites, protection of vulnerable heritage, and sustainable use of newly formed geological features. Legal frameworks and planning guidelines should reflect the dynamic nature of seismic landscapes, ensuring that reconstruction and development initiatives do not compromise geological or cultural heritage. Furthermore, fostering geotourism and geoproduct development around seismic features can align conservation goals with socioeconomic benefits, creating a sustainable model for both heritage management and community resilience.
In summary, the Al Haouz earthquake underscores that seismic events are active agents in shaping geoheritage, offering scientific, educational, and socioeconomic opportunities while also posing preservation challenges. Integrating these insights into policy, conservation, and community programs is essential to safeguard Morocco’s dynamic geological legacy and transform hazard impacts into enduring learning and development platforms.

6. Conclusions

The 2023 Al Haouz earthquake is a rare and compelling example of geoheritage formation, showing how seismic events can simultaneously destroy, modify, and create landscapes of scientific, educational, and cultural significance. The co-seismic landforms, fault traces, and slope failures generated by this event provide a non-renewable record of tectonic activity that is invaluable for understanding the geological evolution of the High Atlas region. This unique geological footprint underscores the importance of viewing earthquakes not solely as hazards but as dynamic agents shaping Morocco’s geoheritage.
The event also underscores the urgent need for interdisciplinary research that integrates geology, geomorphology, seismology, cultural studies, and the social sciences. Rapid documentation, advanced monitoring, and detailed mapping of affected areas are essential to preserve fragile seismic features and enhance our understanding of earthquake-driven landscape processes. Incorporating social memory, traditional knowledge, and heritage considerations ensures that the human and cultural dimensions of seismic events are preserved alongside their geological signatures.
Strategically, the Al Haouz earthquake presents opportunities for Morocco to advance geoheritage valorization and sustainable development. By promoting geotourism routes, community-based products, and digital geoproducts that interpret seismic landscapes, the country can leverage this natural event to support education, scientific engagement, and local livelihoods. In addition, the region now offers a strong foundation for exploring the creation of a future geopark, where earthquake-related landforms and active tectonic features could form a dedicated thematic axis for geoeducation and risk awareness. Integrating these initiatives—including potential geopark development—into national geoconservation and disaster-preparedness strategies strengthens resilience and enhances the visibility of Morocco’s geological heritage at regional and global scales.
In conclusion, the Al Haouz earthquake is a landmark case that bridges natural hazard science and geoheritage conservation, emphasizing the dual imperatives of research and strategic valorization to safeguard Morocco’s dynamic and fragile geological legacy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.H. and K.N.; methodology, M.E.H. and K.N.; validation, K.N.; formal analysis, M.E.H.; investigation, M.E.H.; resources, M.E.H.; data curation, M.E.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.H.; writing—review and editing, K.N.; visualization, M.E.H. and K.N.; supervision, K.N.; project administration, M.E.H.; funding acquisition, M.E.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this research are included in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nichols, J.; Beavers, J. Development and Calibration of an Earthquake Fatality Function. Earthq. Spectra 2003, 19, 605–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shin, J.Y.; Chen, S.; Kim, T.-W. Application of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with mixed gumbel distribution to estimate extreme magnitude of tsunamigenic earthquake. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2015, 19, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rashid, M.; Ahmad, N. Economic losses due to earthquake—Induced structural damages in RC SMRF structures. Cogent Eng. 2017, 4, 1296529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Long, L.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, L. CEDLES: A framework for plugin-based applications for earthquake risk prediction and loss assessment. Nat. Hazards 2020, 103, 531–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, S.; Ni, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, W.; Long, Z.; Ma, H.; Zhou, G.; Luo, Y.; Geng, C. Susceptibility Analysis of Geohazards in the Longmen Mountain Region after the Wenchuan Earthquake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chávez-García, F.J.; Monsalve Jaramillo, H.; Gómez Cano, M.; Vila Ortega, J.J. Vulnerability and Site Effects in Earthquake Disasters in Armenia (Colombia). I—Site Effects. Geosciences 2018, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Godínez-Domínguez, E.A.; Tena-Colunga, A.; Pérez-Rocha, L.E.; Archundia-Aranda, H.I.; Gómez-Bernal, A.; Ruiz-Torres, R.P.; Escamilla-Cruz, J.L. The September 7, 2017 Tehuantepec, Mexico, earthquake: Damage assessment in masonry structures for housing. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 56, 102123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tavera, H.; Bernal, I. The Pisco (Peru) Earthquake of 15 August 2007. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2008, 79, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. UNDRR. UNDRR. Global Natural Disaster Assessment Report 2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/73363_2019globalnaturaldisasterassessment.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  10. EERI. The MW 8.8 Chile Earthquake of February 27, 2010. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Newsletter, Special Earthquake Report: 20p. 2010. Available online: https://lfestorage.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/images/2010_02_27_chile/pdfs/Chile10_insert.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2026).
  11. Dollet, C.; Guéguen, P. Global occurrence models for human and economic losses due to earthquakes (1967–2018) considering exposed GDP and population. Nat. Hazards 2022, 110, 349–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmed, S.K.; Chandran, D.; Hussein, S.; Sv, P.; Chakraborty, S.; Islam, M.R.; Dhama, K. Environmental Health Risks After the 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake and Salient Mitigating Strategies: A Critical Appraisal. Environ. Health Insights 2023, 17, 11786302231200865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sassa, S.; Takagawa, T. Liquefied gravity flow-induced tsunami: First evidence and comparison from the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters. Landslides 2019, 16, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hidayat, R.; Kiyota, T.; Tada, N.; Hayakawa, J.; Nawir, H. Reconnaissance on Liquefaction-induced Flow Failure Caused by the 2018 Mw 7.5 Sulawesi Earthquake, Palu, Indonesia. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2020, 52, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kiyota, T.; Furuichi, H.; Hidayat, R.F.; Tada, N.; Nawir, H. Overview of long-distance flow-slide caused by the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia. Soils Found. 2020, 60, 722–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kiyota, T.; Shiga, M.; Mori, K.; Katagiri, T.; Furuichi, H.; Setiawan, H. Triggering mechanism of long-distance flow-type landslides caused by 2018 Sulawesi Earthquake, Indonesia. Soils Found. 2025, 65, 101544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yin, Y. Researches on the geo-hazards triggered by Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan. J. Eng. Geol. 2008, 16, 433–444. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Feng, X. Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities in Mainland China Based on Physical Simulation and Empirical Statistics-A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cui, P.; Chen, X.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-Y.; Su, F.-H.; Wei, F.-Q.; Han, Y.-S.; Liu, H.-J.; Zhuang, J.-Q. The Wenchuan Earthquake (May 12, 2008), Sichuan Province, China, and resulting geohazards. Nat. Hazards 2011, 56, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Migoń, P.; Pijet-Migoń, E. Natural Disasters, Geotourism, and Geo-interpretation. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scarlett, J.P.; Riede, F. The Dark Geocultural Heritage of Volcanoes: Combining Cultural and Geoheritage Perspectives for Mutual Benefit. Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1705–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Németh, K.; Sowaigh, A.; Zakharovskyi, V.; Toni, M.; Ashor, M.; Sokolov, V.; Moqeem, F.; Abdulhafaz, K.; Hablil, T.; Sehli, T.; et al. The Volcanic Geoheritage in the Pristine Natural Environment of Harrat Lunayyir, Saudi Arabia: Opportunities for Geotourism and Geohazard Issues. Heritage 2025, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guilbaud, M.N.; Villalba, N.I.; Osnaya, E.R.; del Pilar Ortega-Larrocea, M.; Zeno-Lira, E.; Cram-Heydrich, S. The multiple values of urban geosites: El Arenal and Viaje a la Naturaleza parks in Mexico City. Geofis. Int. 2024, 63, 1067–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Németh, K.; Moufti, M.R.; Mahmoud, A.; Sowaigh, A.; Hablil, T.; Hassan, K.; Sehli, T. The Vanishing Volcanic Geoheritage of a Key Scoria Cone and its Significance in Volcanic Hazard Resilience of the Active Monogenetic Volcanic Field near Al Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Geoconserv. Res. 2023, 6, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stix, J.; Heiken, G. Communication when it is needed most—The past, present and future of volcano geoheritage. Bull. Volcanol. 2022, 84, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Németh, K. Geoheritage and geodiversity aspects of catastrophic volcanic eruptions: Lessons from the 15th of January 2022 Hunga Tonga—Hunga Ha’apai eruption, SW Pacific. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2022, 10, 546–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sotiriou, P.; Nunes, P. Volcanic Landscapes and Geotourism Development: Analysing How Madeira’s Volcanic Origin Shapes its Tourism Industry, with a Focus on Hiking Tours and Scenic Viewpoints. Geoheritage 2025, 17, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Navasardyan, G.; Meliksetian, K.; Savov, I.P.; Gevorgyan, H.; Bangoyan, M.; Galstyan, A.; Grigoryan, E. Volcanic Geoheritage and Geotouristic Potential of the Gegham Monogenetic Volcanic Upland (Armenia). Geoheritage 2025, 17, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kovacs, M.; Szakács, A.; Andrăşanu, A.; Denuț, I. The “Gutâi-Maramureș” UNESCO Geopark Project Development and Heritage Values-Based Sustainable Tourism in the Gutâi Volcanic Zone, East Carpathians (Romania). Land 2025, 14, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arias-Díaz, A.; Ibargüen-Angulo, E.; Murcia, H.; Osorio-Ocampo, S.; Bolaños-Cabrera, G.; Botero-Gómez, L.A.; Riascos-Hurtado, A. Geotourism in Monogenetic Volcanoes: The Case of Tapias-Guacaica Monogenetic Volcanic Field in Colombia. Heritage 2025, 8, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Redouane, M.; Lagnaoui, A.; Haissen, F.; Sadki, O.; Raji, M. Volcanic Geoheritage at the Ne of Morocco: Selected Sites of Oujda and Guercif (Jorf Lakhdar and Guilliz). Geoheritage 2024, 16, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Szakács, A.; Kovacs, M. Volcanic Landforms and Landscapes of the East Carpathians (Romania) and Their Geoheritage Values. Land 2022, 11, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hernández, W.; Dóniz-Páez, J.; Pérez, N.M. Urban Geotourism in La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. Land 2022, 11, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Erfurt-Cooper, P. Volcano Tourism and Visitor Safety: Still Playing with Fire? A 10-Year Update. Geoheritage 2022, 14, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Henriques, M.H. Broadening Frontiers in Geoconservation: The Concept of Intangible Geoheritage Represented by the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. Geoheritage 2023, 15, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hassani, M.J.; Hairapetian, V. The Crassostrea Coquina Bed in the Qeshm Geopark (Southern Iran): Paleontology, Paleoecology and Geotourism Potential. Geoconserv. Res. 2025, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Krishnapriya, V.K.; Amrutha, A.S.; Rajaneesh, A.; Pradeep, G.S.; Sankar, G.; Nandakumar, D.; Muraleedharan, C.; Kanungo, D.P.; Ali, A.P.; Martha, T.R.; et al. From Disaster To Conservation: Geoheritage Potential of the 2024 Wayanad Landslide, India. Geoheritage 2025, 17, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aleksova, B.; Milevski, I.; Lukić, T.; Marković, S.B.; Perić, Z.M. Preliminary Assessment of Hydrological Heritage in North Macedonia: A Novel Contribution to Geodiversity Protection. Geoheritage 2025, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vandelli, V.; Migoń, P.; Palmgren, Y.; Spyrou, E.; Saitis, G.; Andrikopoulou, M.E.; Coratza, P.; Medjkane, M.; Prieto, C.; Kalovrektis, K.; et al. Towards Enhanced Understanding and Experience of Landforms, Geohazards, and Geoheritage through Virtual Reality Technologies in Education: Lessons from the GeoVT Project. Geosciences 2024, 14, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Migoń, P. The Kamienne Mountains—Late Palaeozoic Volcanic Terrain Shaped by Late Quaternary Landslides. In World Geomorphological Landscapes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  41. Al’Afif, M.; Sartohadi, J.; Samodra, G. Impact of landslide on geoheritage: Opportunities through integration, geomorphological classification and machine learning. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2024, 12, 333–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tronti, G.; Vergari, F.; Bollati, I.M.; Belisario, F.; Del Monte, M.; Pelfini, M.; Fredi, P. From landslide characterization to nature reserve management: The “Scialimata Grande di Torre Alfina” landslide Geosite (Central Apennines, Italy). J. Mt. Sci. 2023, 20, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Morino, C.; Coratza, P.; Soldati, M. Landslides, a Key Landform in the Global Geological Heritage. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 864760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fepuleai, A.; Németh, K. Volcanic Geoheritage of Landslides and Rockfalls on a Tropical Ocean Island (Western Samoa, SW Pacific). Geoheritage 2019, 11, 577–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panizza, M. The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): A Key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 2009, 1, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baadi, K.; Németh, K. Volcanic Landscape of the Middle Atlas: A Representative Heritage of Moroccan Geological History. In Geoheritage of the Middle Atlas (Morocco); Baadi, K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 195–218. [Google Scholar]
  47. Baadi, K.; Tefogoum, G.Z.; Amine, A. The Volcanism of the Plio-Quaternary of Azrou-Timahdite Plateau (Central Middle Atlas, Morocco): Potential for Geotourism Development. In Geoheritage of the Middle Atlas (Morocco); Baadi, K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 219–232. [Google Scholar]
  48. Benamrane, M.; Németh, K.; Jadid, M.; Talbi, E.H. Geomorphological Classification of Monogenetic Volcanoes and Its Implication to Tectonic Stress Orientation in the Middle Atlas Volcanic Field (Morocco). Land 2022, 11, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El Mrabet, T. Earthquake History of Morocco. Third-Cycle Unpublished Thesis, Humanities and Social Sciences Faculty, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco, 1991; 375p. [Google Scholar]
  50. El Mrabet, T. The Great Earthquakes in the Maghreb Region and Their Consequences on Man and Environment; Centre National de Recherche Scientifique et Technique: Rabat, Morocco, 2005; Volume 451. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cherkaoui, T.-E. Seismicity and Seismic Hazard in Morocco 1901–2010. Bull. l’Inst. Sci. 2012, 34, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  52. Falconer, B. Agadir, Morocco, reconstruction work six years after the earthquake of February 1960. Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 1968, 1, 72–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Paradise, T.R. Perception of earthquake risk in Agadir, Morocco: A case study from a Muslim community. Glob. Environ. Chang. Part B Environ. Hazards 2005, 6, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tahayt, A.; Feigl, K.L.; Mourabit, T.; Rigo, A.; Reilinger, R.; McClusky, S.; Fadil, A.; Berthier, E.; Dorbath, L.; Serroukh, M.; et al. The Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake of 24 February 2004, analysis and interpretation of data from ENVISAT ASAR and SPOT5 validated by ground-based observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. van der Woerd, J.; Dorbath, C.; Ousadou, F.; Dorbath, L.; Delouis, B.; Jacques, E.; Tapponnier, P.; Hahou, Y.; Menzhi, M.; Frogneux, M.; et al. The Al Hoceima Mw 6.4 earthquake of 24 February 2004 and its aftershocks sequence. J. Geodyn. 2014, 77, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kariche, J.; Meghraoui, M.; Timoulali, Y.; Cetin, E.; Toussaint, R. The Al Hoceima earthquake sequence of 1994, 2004 and 2016: Stress transfer and poroelasticity in the Rif and Alboran Sea region. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 212, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Skikra, H.; Amrouch, K.; Soulaimani, A.; Leprêtre, R.; Ouabid, M.; Bodinier, J.-L. The intracontinental High Atlas belt: Geological overview and pending questions. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Froitzheim, N.; Stets, J.; Wurster, P. Aspects of Western High Atlas tectonics. In The Atlas System of Morocco: Studies on Its Geodynamic Evolution; Jacobshagen, V.H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 219–244. [Google Scholar]
  59. El Harfi, A.; Lang, J.; Salomon, J.; Chellai, E. Cenozoic sedimentary dynamics of the Ouarzazate foreland basin (Central High Atlas Mountains, Morocco). Int. J. Earth Sci. 2001, 90, 393–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fraissinet, C.; El Zouine, M.; Morel, J.-L.; Poisson, A.; Andrieux, J.; Faure-Muret, A. Structural evolution of the southern and northern Central High Atlas in paleogene and Mio-Pliocene times. In The Atlas System of Morocco: Studies on its Geodynamic Evolution; Jacobshagen, V.H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 273–291. [Google Scholar]
  61. Leprêtre, R.; Missenard, Y.; Barbarand, J.; Gautheron, C.; Jouvie, I.; Saddiqi, O. Polyphased Inversions of an Intracontinental Rift: Case Study of the Marrakech High Atlas, Morocco. Tectonics 2018, 37, 818–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Proust, F.; Petit, J.-P.; Tapponnier, P. L’accident du Tizi n’Test et le role des decrochements dans la tectonique du Haut Atlas occidental (Maroc). Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 1977, 7, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mustaphi, H.; Medina, F.; Jabour, H.; Hoepffner, C. Le bassin du Souss (Zone de Faille du Tizi n’Test, Haut Atlas occidental, Maroc): Résultat d’une inversion tectonique contrlée par une faille de détachement profonde. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 1997, 24, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Boulton, S.J.; Stokes, M.; Mather, A.E. Transient fluvial incision as an indicator of active faulting and Plio-Quaternary uplift of the Moroccan High Atlas. Tectonophysics 2014, 633, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hassan, O.; Petit, J.-P. La limite sud de la chaîne hercynienne dans le Haut Atlas (Maroc): Reconstitution d’un saillant non déformé. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 1992, 163, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
  66. Missenard, Y.; Taki, Z.; Frizon de Lamotte, D.; Benammi, M.; Hafid, M.; Leturmy, P.; Sébrier, M. Tectonic styles in the Marrakesh High Atlas (Morocco): The role of heritage and mechanical stratigraphy. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2007, 48, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hafid, M.; Zizi, M.; Bally, A.W.; Ait Salem, A. Structural styles of the western onshore and offshore termi-nation of the High Atlas, Morocco. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2006, 338, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Beauchamp, W.; Allmendinger, R.W.; Barazangi, M.; Demnati, A.; El Alji, M.; Dahmani, M. Inversion tectonics and the evolution of the High Atlas Mountains, Morocco, based on a geological-geophysical transect. Tectonics 1999, 18, 163–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Teixell, A.; Arboleya, M.-L.; Julivert, M.; Charroud, M. Tectonic shortening and topography in the central High Atlas (Morocco). Tectonics 2003, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Teixell, A.; Ayarza, P.; Tesón, E.; Babault, J.; Alvarez-Lobato, F.; Mohammed, C.; Julivert, M.; Barbero, L.; Mostafa, A.; Arboleya, M. Geodinámica de las cordilleras del Alto y Medio Atlas: Síntesis de los conocimientos actuales. Rev. Soc. Geol. Esp. 2007, 20, 119–135. [Google Scholar]
  71. Teixell, A.; Ayarza, P.; Zeyen, H.; Fernàndez, M.; Arboleya, M.-L. Effects of mantle upwelling in a compressional setting: The Atlas Mountains of Morocco. Terra Nova 2005, 17, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lanari, R.; Faccenna, C.; Fellin, M.G.; Essaifi, A.; Nahid, A.; Medina, F.; Youbi, N. Tectonic Evolution of the Western High Atlas of Morocco: Oblique Convergence, Reactivation, and Transpression. Tectonics 2020, 39, e2019TC005563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Saura, E.; Vergés, J.; Martín-Martín Juan, D.; Messager, G.; Moragas, M.; Razin, P.; Grélaud, C.; Joussiaume, R.; Malaval, M.; Homke, S.; et al. Syn- to post-rift diapirism and minibasins of the Central High Atlas (Morocco): The changing face of a mountain belt. J. Geol. Soc. 2014, 171, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Skikra, H.; Amrouch, K.; Soulaimani, A. Paleostress constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Central High Atlas orogen. J. Struct. Geol. 2024, 186, 105198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Enniouar, A.; Lagnaoui, A.; Habib, A. A Middle Jurassic sauropod tracksite in the Argana Basin, Western High Atlas, Morocco: An example of paleoichnological heritage for sustainable geotourism. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2014, 125, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Amine, F.; Berrahma, M.H.; Aarab, A. Inventory and Management of Dinosaurs Traces: A case Study of Azilal Region, Morocco. Int. J. Glob. Sci. Res. 2018, 5, 198687588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Amine, F.; Berrahma, M.; Aarab, A. Dinosaurs Footprints of the High Atlas Morocco by using Geological Heritage Information System. Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Technol. 2020, 11, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lkebir, N.; Masrour, M.; Pascual-Arribas, C.; de Ducla, M.; Hernández-Medrano, N.; Pérez-Lorente, F. Short report: The Anza tracksite: Ichnological heritage and geoeducational significance of dinosaur and pterosaur tracks in coastal Morocco. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 171, 103949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ait Haddou, M.; Bouchriti, Y.; Belkacim, S.; Yazdi, A.; Kabbachi, B. Late Carboniferous Paleoflora of El Menizla Formation (Argana Corridor, Morocco): Implications for Geotourism and Geoconservation. Geoheritage 2025, 17, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bouzekraoui, H.; Barakat, A.; El Youssi, M.; Touhami, F.; Mouaddine, A.; Hafid, A. Mapping geosites as gateways to the geotourism management in Central High-Atlas (Morocco). Quaest. Geogr. 2018, 37, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bouzekraoui, H.; Barakat, A.; Mouaddine, A.; El Youssi, M.; Touhami, F.; Hafid, A. Mapping geoheritage for geotourism management, a case study of Aït Bou Oulli Valley in Central High-Atlas (Morocco). Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bouzekraoui, H.; Barakat, A.; Touhami, F.; Mouaddine, A.; Youssi, M.E. Inventory and assessment of geomorphosites for geotourism development: A case study of Aït Bou Oulli valley (Central High-Atlas, Morocco). Area 2018, 50, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ait Omar, T.; Taïbi, A.N.; El Hannani, M.; El Khalki, Y. New methodology for inventory and assessment of geomorphosites in the M’goun geopark (Morocco)—Nouvelle méthodologie d’inventaire et d’évaluation des géomorphosites dans le contexte du géoparc M’goun (Maroc). Geo-Eco-Trop 2019, 43, 569–580. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ait Omar, T.; Yahia, E.K.; TaÏBi, A.N.; El Hannani, M. Les géopatrimoines de la partie nord-est du géoparc régional du M’Goun (Maroc): Représentations sociales et valorisation géotouristique. Geo-Regards 2022, 14, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ait Omar, T.; Yahia, E.K.; TaÏBi, A.N.; El Hannani, M.; Haddou, A. A quantitative method for inventory and assessment of geoheritage in the Beni Mellal Atlas Mountains, Morocco. Cinq Cont. 2023, 12, 174–196. [Google Scholar]
  86. Louz, E.; Rais, J.; Ait Barka, A.; Nadem, S.; Barakat, A. Geological heritage of the Taguelft syncline (M’Goun Geopark): Inventory, assessment, and promotion for geotourism development (Central High Atlas, Morocco). Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2022, 10, 218–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Louz, E.; Rais, J.; Barakat, A.; Ait Barka, A.; Nadem, S. Inventory and Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites of the Ait Attab Syncline (M’goun Unesco Geopark, Morocco) to Stimulate Geoconservation, Geotourism and Sustainable Development. Quaest. Geogr. 2023, 42, 115–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Louz, E.; Rais, J.; Barakat, A.; El Baghdadi, M. Identification of Potential Areas for the Development of Geotourism in the Northern Part of the M’goun Geopark (Morocco) Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Sig. Geoheritage 2024, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. El Ouali, M.; Essafraoui, B.; Kabiri, L.; Messaoudi, B.; Ait Lahssaine, I.; Krencker, F.-N.; Martindale, R.C.; Nutz, A.; Bodin, S. Quantitative Assessment and Enhancement of 12 Sites of Geological Interest South of Midelt City (Tizi N’Talghemt, Central High Atlas, Morocco). Geoheritage 2025, 17, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. El Ouali, M.; Kabiri, L.; Essafraoui, B.; Ben Bammou, M.; Ait Lahssaine, I.; Messaoudi, B.; Martindale, R. Geosites and geodiversity sites of the Tinghir–Dades–Imilchil area, Morocco: Toward conservation, education, and tourism development. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2025, 13, 652–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Arrad, T.Y.; Errami, E.; Ennih, N.; Ouajhain, B.; Ettachfini, E.M.; Bouaouda, M.S. Inventory, evaluation and promotion of the Essaouira Province geoheritage (Morocco): Toward a local and socio-economic sustainable development. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Arrad, T.Y.; Errami, E.; Ennih, N.; Ouajhain, B.; Ettachfini, E.M.; Bouaouda, M.S. From geoheritage inventory to geoeducation and geotourism implications: Insight from Jbel Amsittene (Essaouira province, Morocco). J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 161, 103656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bussard, J. Heritage value and didactic potential of geomorphological landscapes: The case of eight sites in the Central High Atlas (Morocco). In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Geomorphology, Coimbra, Portugal, 12–16 September 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bussard, J. Geomorphological landscapes of the M’Goun Geopark (Morocco): Potential for geotourism and local guides’ perspective. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 April 2023; EGU: Vienna, Austria, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Si Mhamdi, H.; Ali, C.; Oukassou, M.; Amar, A.; Baidder, L.; Raji, M.; Ijaajaane, A.; Elfaiz, S.; el Ouariti, S. Enhancing the Geological Heritage of the Errachidia Area in the High Atlas, Morocco: Inventory and a Proposal for a Pedagogic and Geotouristic Trail. Geoheritage 2023, 15, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Elkaichi, A.; Errami, E.; Patel, N. Evaluation of Geotouristic Station Suitability Using GIS-Based Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of the M’Goun UNESCO Geopark, High Atlas (Morocco). Geoheritage 2023, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Elkaichi, A.; Errami, E.; Patel, N. Canyons as potential geotourism attractions of Central High Atlas, Morocco: Comparative analysis of Aït Bouguemaz Valley and Zaouiat Ahansal-Taghia Valley by using GAM model. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2024, 12, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Naimi, L.; Manaouch, M.; Jakimi, A. Leveraging machine learning algorithms to identify potential geosites for geotourism promotion in Ziz upper watershed in southeastern Morocco. Geoj. Tour. Geosites 2024, 57, 2041–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Manaouch, M.; Naimi, L.; Haynou, M.; Aghad, M.; Sadiki, M.; Pham, Q.B.; Jakimi, A. Enhancing Geotourism in Southeastern Morocco through Machine Learning-Based Geomorphosite Identification. Geoheritage 2025, 17, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kchikach, N.; Ibouh, H.; Benali, A.; Charbaoui, A.; El Fels, A.E. Digital Promotion of Geoheritage along a Tourist Route in M’Goun UNESCO Geopark (Central High Atlas, Morocco) and Visitor Typology Analysis. Geosciences 2024, 14, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. El hamidy, M.; Errami, E.; Elkaichi, A. An overview of scientific research on geoheritage in Morocco. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2024, 135, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Noureddine, B.; Adarab, H.; Abdelkrim, E. Geotourism in Idaoutananes Moroccan Western High Atlas: State of valuation and opportunity of improvement. J. Geogr. Geol. 2015, 7, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Achkir, H. The geological heritage of central High Atlas: An asset for integrated geotourism (case of Assif Melloul crossing (common territorial of Anergui and Tillouguite) in the province of Azilal; Béni Mellal-Khénifra-region/Morocco). Int. J. Sci. Res. 2018, 7, 1541–1552. [Google Scholar]
  104. Rais, J.; Barakat, A.; Louz, E.; Ait Barka, A. Geological heritage in the M’Goun geopark: A proposal of geo-itineraries around the Bine El Ouidane dam (Central High Atlas, Morocco). Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2021, 9, 242–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. El Alami, A.; Fattah, A.; Bouzekraoui, H. Biodiversity, an essential component for the M’goun global geopark development (Morocco)—An overview. J. Anal. Sci. Appl. Biotechnol. 2021, 3, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Elkaichi, A.; Errami, E.; Patel, N. Quantitative assessment of the geodiversity of M’Goun UNESCO Geopark, Central High Atlas (Morocco). Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ait Barka, A.; Rais, J.; Barakat, A.; Louz, E.; Nadem, S. The Geosite of Travertine Waterfall of El Ksiba (Morocco): A Heritage to Enhance and Preserve. Proceedings 2023, 87, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ait Barka, A.; Rais, J.; Barakat, A.; Louz, E.; Nadem, S. The Karst Landscapes of Beni Mellal Atlas (Central Morocco): Identification for Promoting Geoconservation and Tourism. Quaest. Geogr. 2022, 41, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Toufik Ait, O.; Yahia El, K.; Haddou, A. Contribution of social perception for identifying geomorphological potential and touristic practices in the North-Eastern part of the M’goun Regional Geopark, Morocco. Afr. Sci. J. 2022, 3, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Asmae, A.; Sarrah, E.; Mohamed, A.; Abdelkrim, E. Cultural Heritage in Imghranes Massif (Drâa-Tafilalet Region, Morocco): An Optimist’s Contribution and opportunity for the local people and Sustainable Tourism. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud. 2022, 37, 387–391. [Google Scholar]
  111. Aichi, A.; Ezaidi, A.; Abioui, M.; En–Nasiry, M.; Nenad, B.; Jelena, M.; Dalibor, P. From geoheritage to geoeducation and geotourism: The Imghranes Massif, Drâa-Tafilalet region, Morocco. In Proceedings of the International Symposium “Geodiversity and Geoheritage-Status and Perspectives”, Perušić, Croatia, 7–9 October 2022. [Google Scholar]
  112. Bussard, J.; Martin, S.; Monbaron, M.; Reynard, E.; Yahia, E.K. Les paysages géomorphologiques du Haut Atlas central (Maroc): Potentiel éducatif et éléments pour la médiation scientifique. Géomorphol. Relief Process. Environ. 2023, 28, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. El Khalki, Y.; Hobléa, F.; Benzidiya, K.; Driss, A.; Kottabi, S.E. M’Goun UNESCO Geopark (Central High Atlas, Morocco), a lever for sustainable and integrated territorial development: What approach to adopt? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Geoparks, Marrakesh, Morocco, 4–11 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
  114. Bouzekraoui, H.; Mouaddine, A.; Jaa, F.; Hafid, A. La carte géotouristique des communes de Foum El Ancer et Taghzirt comme moyen de valorisation géotouristique, Atlas de Béni Mellal, (Maroc). In Les Ressources Naturelles Dans la Région de Béni Mellal-Khénifra: Evaluation, Gestion et Valorisation. 2024, pp. 156–162. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hicham-Bouzekraoui/publication/384864600_Les_ressources_naturelles_dans_la_region_de_Beni_Mellal-Khenifra_evaluation_gestion_et_valorisation_La_carte_geotouristique_des_communes_de_Foum_El_Ancer_et_Taghzirt_comme_moyen_de_valorisation_geotou/links/670ab5c8ffe5b72812457c47/Les-ressources-naturelles-dans-la-region-de-Beni-Mellal-Khenifra-evaluation-gestion-et-valorisation-La-carte-geotouristique-des-communes-de-Foum-El-Ancer-et-Taghzirt-comme-moyen-de-valorisation-geot.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2026).
  115. Ouacha, B.N.; Souhel, A.; El Bchari, F.; Chafiki, H. Geological Sites of the Anergui Region: Description and Place in the Alpine Geological History of the M’goun UNESCO Global Geopark (Morocco). Iraqi Geol. J. 2024, 57, 264–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wakass, S.; Ezaidi, A.; El Youssi, M.; Mansouri, I.; Achiban, H.; Chellik, S.; El Azzouzi, M.h. Geosites of High Atlas of Marrakech (Morocco): Geological Characterization, Accessibility, and Potential Interests for Sustainable Tourism. Geoheritage 2023, 15, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Elfaiz, S.; Tayebi, M.; Si Mhamdi, H.; Benammi, M.; Charroud, A. Inventory and Assessment of the Geoheritage Potential of the Imilchil District (Central High Atlas, Morocco). Geoheritage 2025, 17, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chalouan, A.; Gil, A.J.; Chabli, A.; Bargach, K.; Liemlahi, H.; El Kadiri, K.; Tendero-Salmerón, V.; Galindo-Zaldívar, J. cGPS Record of Active Extension in Moroccan Meseta and Shortening in Atlasic Chains under the Eurasia-Nubia Convergence. Sensors 2023, 23, 4846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Yeck, W.L.; Hatem, A.E.; Goldberg, D.E.; Barnhart, W.D.; Jobe, J.A.T.; Shelly, D.R.; Villaseñor, A.; Benz, H.M.; Earle, P.S. Rapid Source Characterization of the 2023 Mw 6.8 Al Haouz, Morocco, Earthquake. Seism. Rec. 2023, 3, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Boulanouar, A.; Khalil, A.; Sebbani, J.; El Ouali, A.; Rahmouni, A. Geographic Distribution of the b-value in north Morocco and its Surrounding for Seismic Zones Identification. Jordan J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2025, 16, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  121. Malusà, M.G.; Ellero, A.; Ottria, G. Tectonics of the Mw 6.8 Al Haouz earthquake (Morocco) reveals minor role of asthenospheric upwelling. Tectonophysics 2024, 891, 230533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Huang, K.; Wei, G.; Chen, K.; Zhang, N.; Li, M.; Dal Zilio, L. The 2023 Mw 6.8 Morocco Earthquake: A Lower Crust Event Triggered by Mantle Upwelling? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2024, 51, e2024GL109052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Bennis, K.; Benazzi, K. Navigating Natural Disaster Disruption in the Hospitality Sector: Insights From the September 8, 2023 Earthquake in Morocco. IDRiM J. 2024, 14, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. El Fellah, B.; Azzouz, O.; Asebriy, L. Sikha Asfalou: Exemple de glissement sur la côte méditerranéenne des Bokoya entre Torrès et Badis, (Rif septentrional, Maroc). Bull.-Réseau Eros. 1996, 16, 222–230. [Google Scholar]
  125. Azzouz, O.; El Fellah, B.; Chalouan, A. Processus de glissement dans le Massif de Bokoya (Rif interne, Maroc): Exemple de Cala Bonita. Bull. l’Inst. Sci. Rabat Sect. Sci. Terre 2002, 24, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  126. Labriki, A.; Zerdeb, M.A.; Majid, I.; Chakiri, S.; Abbach, J.; Bejjaji, Z.; El Hmidi, F. Morphodynamic and Structural Analysis of Tamda Landslide Dam (Middle Atlas, Morocco). Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2020, 11, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Labriki, A.; Bouchatta, Y.; Labriki, K.; Hassani, A.; Zoraa, S.; Chakiri, S.; Ghazi, A. Co-seismic landslide mapping following the 2023 El Haouz earthquake using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar and optical imagery (High Atlas, Morocco). Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2025, 26, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ajraoui, A.; Chakiri, S.; Mansouri, H.; Haddou, M.; Laassilia, O.; Labriki, A.; Amine, S. Geotechnical Analysis and Stabilization of the Jebha Landslide: A Case Study from Morocco’s Mediterranean Ring Road. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2025, 13, 949–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bao, M.; Abdelaal, M.I.; Saleh, M.; Chourak, M.; Mohamed, M.; Xing, M. Unlocking the hidden secrets of the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake: Coseismic model reveals intraplate reverse faulting in Morocco derived from SAR and seismic data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2025, 137, 104420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cheloni, D.; Famiglietti, N.A.; Tolomei, C.; Caputo, R.; Vicari, A. The 8 September 2023, MW 6.8, Morocco Earthquake: A Deep Transpressive Faulting Along the Active High Atlas Mountain Belt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2024, 51, e2023GL106992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, X.; Liu, J. The source kinematics and slip distribution of the 2023 Mw 6.8 Morocco earthquake. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2024, 220, 105451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ait Zamzami, H.; Elaanzouli, M.; Saidi, J.; Boumeaza, T. Resilience and Vulnerability: The Haouz Earthquake’s Effect on Housing In The Western High Atlas of Morocco. Int. J. Disaster Dev. Interface 2024, 4, 27–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Machay, F.; El Moussaoui, S.; El Talibi, H. Landslide susceptibility mapping using the analytical hierarchy process and the Geographic Information System along the Agadir Ida Ou-Tanane province, Morocco. E3S Web Conf. 2024, 502, 03002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Imtiaz, A.; Saloustros, S.; Beqiraj, M.; Cortés, G.; Devaux, M.; Lattion, E.; Zhu, Y.; Sehaqui, H. Understanding building damage through the lens of the Swiss post-seismic reconnaissance mission of 2023 Al Haouz, Morocco, earthquake. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 16587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Allaki, F.-E.; Bargach, K.; Qarbous, A. Assessment of landslide risks in the western High Atlas of Morocco following the El Haouz earthquake, using the analytical hierarchy process and multi-criteria geographic information system. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 2026, 27, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. News, S. SNRT News. (2024, January 9)—Nizar Baraka: De Nouvelles Sources d’Eau Sont Apparues Suite au Séisme d’Al Haouz. SNRT News. 2024. Available online: https://snrtnews.com/fr/article/nizar-baraka-de-nouvelles-sources-deau-sont-apparues-suite-au-seisme-dal-haouz-89976 (accessed on 7 February 2026).
  137. Rautela, P. Indigenous technical knowledge inputs for effective disaster management in the fragile Himalayan ecosystem. Disaster Prev. Manag. 2005, 14, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Becker, J.; Johnston, D.; Lazrus, H.; Crawford, G.; Nelson, D. Use of traditional knowledge in emergency management for tsunami hazard: A case study from Washington State, USA. Disaster Prev. Manag. 2008, 17, 488–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. King, D.N.; Goff, J.R. Benefitting from differences in knowledge, practice and belief: Māori oral traditions and natural hazards science. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 10, 1927–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pareek, A.; Trivedi, P. Cultural values and indigenous knowledge of climate change and disaster prediction in Rajasthan, India. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2011, 10, 183–189. [Google Scholar]
  141. Lauer, M. Oral Traditions or Situated Practices? Understanding How Indigenous Communities Respond to Environmental Disasters. Hum. Organ. 2012, 71, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Syahputra, H. Indigenous knowledge representation in mitigation process: A study of communities’ understandings of natural disasters in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Collect. Curation 2019, 38, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. El Hamidy, M.; Errami, E.; Elkaichi, A. Current Trends and Future Directions for Geoheritage Assessment Methodology in Morocco. Geoconserv. Res. 2024, 7, 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. El Hamidy, M.; Errami, E.; Ghani, M. Museal Activity to Promote Geotourism and Geosite Protection: The Case of the National Ceramics Museum, Safi, Morocco. Geoconserv. Res. 2024, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. El Hamidy, M.; Errami, E.; Orion, N. Proposed geo-educational activities at the Sidi Bouzid geosite, Safi Province, Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2024, 12, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. El Hamidy, M.; Errami, E. The geosites of Safi province (Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco): Inventory and assessment for geoconservation, geotourism, geoeducation, geoparks, and local sustainable development. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 2025, 13, 68–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. El Hamidy, M.; Errami, E.; Neto de Carvalho, C.; Rodrigues, J. Innovative Geoproduct Development for Sustainable Tourism: The Case of the Safi Geopark Project (Marrakesh–Safi Region, Morocco). Sustainability 2025, 17, 6478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ottria, G.; Ellero, A.; Frassi, C.; Amorfini, A.; Rosani, I.; Benato Cortecci, M. Human reactions to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake in Marrakech, Morocco: Findings from a survey within the UNESCO Global Geoparks community. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2025, 125, 105597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Co-occurrences network map generated based on 210 research outputs from search terms within Title, Abstract, and Keywords, such as Geoheritage AND Earthquake OR Tectonic OR Fault OR Fold OR Seismicity.
Figure 1. Co-occurrences network map generated based on 210 research outputs from search terms within Title, Abstract, and Keywords, such as Geoheritage AND Earthquake OR Tectonic OR Fault OR Fold OR Seismicity.
Geosciences 16 00076 g001
Figure 2. Earthquake and Morocco co-occurrences network map (a) and Geoheritage and Morocco co-occurrences network map (b) highlight the maturity of research activity within Morocco in the field of Earthquake science, while Geoheritage research is still in the initial stage of research fields.
Figure 2. Earthquake and Morocco co-occurrences network map (a) and Geoheritage and Morocco co-occurrences network map (b) highlight the maturity of research activity within Morocco in the field of Earthquake science, while Geoheritage research is still in the initial stage of research fields.
Geosciences 16 00076 g002
Figure 3. Morocco seismic architecture based on the USGS Earthquake Catalogue data. The 8th of September 2023 Earthquake occurred along a central tectonic zone that marks the Atlas Mountains, while the country’s main seismic zone is in the northern areas.
Figure 3. Morocco seismic architecture based on the USGS Earthquake Catalogue data. The 8th of September 2023 Earthquake occurred along a central tectonic zone that marks the Atlas Mountains, while the country’s main seismic zone is in the northern areas.
Geosciences 16 00076 g003
Figure 4. Simplified geological map of the High Atlas Mountains showing the main geological exposures and structural features of the range (redrawn from Teixell et al., 2007 [70]).
Figure 4. Simplified geological map of the High Atlas Mountains showing the main geological exposures and structural features of the range (redrawn from Teixell et al., 2007 [70]).
Geosciences 16 00076 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of peer-reviewed geodiversity and geoheritage studies conducted in the Moroccan High Atlas, based on a review of international academic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar).
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of peer-reviewed geodiversity and geoheritage studies conducted in the Moroccan High Atlas, based on a review of international academic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar).
Geosciences 16 00076 g005
Figure 6. Macroseismic intensity map of the Mw 6.8 Al Haouz earthquake. Modified from USGS (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000kufc/dyfi/intensity) (accessed on 25 September 2025). The map illustrates the spatial pattern of shaking intensities (MMI V to X+), together with the epicenter, subsequent earthquakes, and the most affected villages. Circle sizes represent the number of reported fatalities in each province, with a total of 2497 deaths and 2476 injuries across the region.
Figure 6. Macroseismic intensity map of the Mw 6.8 Al Haouz earthquake. Modified from USGS (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000kufc/dyfi/intensity) (accessed on 25 September 2025). The map illustrates the spatial pattern of shaking intensities (MMI V to X+), together with the epicenter, subsequent earthquakes, and the most affected villages. Circle sizes represent the number of reported fatalities in each province, with a total of 2497 deaths and 2476 injuries across the region.
Geosciences 16 00076 g006
Figure 10. Spatial distribution map of rockfalls and low-displacement slope movements induced by the Al Haouz earthquake, overlaid on a background representing the relief, slope, and main fault network of the region [127]. Examples of rockfalls and rock collapses triggered by the Al Haouz earthquake, observed in Google Earth images dated 19 September 2023, 10 days after the earthquake. (A1) Rockfalls and collapses in the rural commune Aghbar (Lat = 30°53′32.77” N; Long = 8°29′20.09” W); (A2) Rockfalls in a fault zone (Lat = 30°54′41.75” N; Long = 8°28′11.13” W); (B1) Cliff collapse blocking the road near Ighermane village, Chichaoua province (Lat = 31°8′58.71”N; Long = 8°26′7.50” W); (B2) Cliff collapse (Lat = 31°9′11.79” N; Long = 8°23′57.78” W). The tragic co-seismic collapse of massive rock formations onto the village of Imi N’Tala (zone c, Lat= 31°7′44.85” N; Long= 8°16′4.30” W), resulting in the deaths of more than 80 people; (C) Google Earth image taken only five days after the earthquake on 14 September 2024, showing the total destruction of the village caused by the collapse of Upper Cretaceous limestone formations at Imi N’Tala.
Figure 10. Spatial distribution map of rockfalls and low-displacement slope movements induced by the Al Haouz earthquake, overlaid on a background representing the relief, slope, and main fault network of the region [127]. Examples of rockfalls and rock collapses triggered by the Al Haouz earthquake, observed in Google Earth images dated 19 September 2023, 10 days after the earthquake. (A1) Rockfalls and collapses in the rural commune Aghbar (Lat = 30°53′32.77” N; Long = 8°29′20.09” W); (A2) Rockfalls in a fault zone (Lat = 30°54′41.75” N; Long = 8°28′11.13” W); (B1) Cliff collapse blocking the road near Ighermane village, Chichaoua province (Lat = 31°8′58.71”N; Long = 8°26′7.50” W); (B2) Cliff collapse (Lat = 31°9′11.79” N; Long = 8°23′57.78” W). The tragic co-seismic collapse of massive rock formations onto the village of Imi N’Tala (zone c, Lat= 31°7′44.85” N; Long= 8°16′4.30” W), resulting in the deaths of more than 80 people; (C) Google Earth image taken only five days after the earthquake on 14 September 2024, showing the total destruction of the village caused by the collapse of Upper Cretaceous limestone formations at Imi N’Tala.
Geosciences 16 00076 g010
Figure 11. Very steep areas are prime locations for earthquake-induced rock falls or landslides. Slope 4 refers to slope angles between 30 and 40 degrees, while Slope 5 indicates slope angles higher than 40 degrees.
Figure 11. Very steep areas are prime locations for earthquake-induced rock falls or landslides. Slope 4 refers to slope angles between 30 and 40 degrees, while Slope 5 indicates slope angles higher than 40 degrees.
Geosciences 16 00076 g011
Figure 12. Steep slopes (Slope 3 indicates slope angles between 20 and 30 degrees) are unstable grounds and potential hazard zones after earthquakes.
Figure 12. Steep slopes (Slope 3 indicates slope angles between 20 and 30 degrees) are unstable grounds and potential hazard zones after earthquakes.
Geosciences 16 00076 g012
Figure 13. Flat areas (Slope 1, with slope angles less than 10 degrees, while Slope 2 refers to slope angles between 10 and 20 degrees) are potential regions where mass movements can carry debris. Debris flow hazards are expected after earthquakes.
Figure 13. Flat areas (Slope 1, with slope angles less than 10 degrees, while Slope 2 refers to slope angles between 10 and 20 degrees) are potential regions where mass movements can carry debris. Debris flow hazards are expected after earthquakes.
Geosciences 16 00076 g013
Figure 14. (A) Conceptual design for the Al Haouz Earthquake Interpretation Centre, featuring interactive displays and immersive seismic visualization tools to enhance public understanding of regional seismicity and geohazards. (B) Traditional-style earthquake simulator within the centre, allowing visitors to experience the shaking intensity of real seismic events safely.
Figure 14. (A) Conceptual design for the Al Haouz Earthquake Interpretation Centre, featuring interactive displays and immersive seismic visualization tools to enhance public understanding of regional seismicity and geohazards. (B) Traditional-style earthquake simulator within the centre, allowing visitors to experience the shaking intensity of real seismic events safely.
Geosciences 16 00076 g014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamidy, M.E.; Németh, K. Manifestations of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake as Geoheritage: Geological Processes, Landscape Impacts, and Implications for Geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas. Geosciences 2026, 16, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020076

AMA Style

Hamidy ME, Németh K. Manifestations of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake as Geoheritage: Geological Processes, Landscape Impacts, and Implications for Geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas. Geosciences. 2026; 16(2):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamidy, Mustapha El, and Károly Németh. 2026. "Manifestations of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake as Geoheritage: Geological Processes, Landscape Impacts, and Implications for Geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas" Geosciences 16, no. 2: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020076

APA Style

Hamidy, M. E., & Németh, K. (2026). Manifestations of the 2023 Al Haouz Earthquake as Geoheritage: Geological Processes, Landscape Impacts, and Implications for Geoconservation in the Moroccan High Atlas. Geosciences, 16(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop