Next Article in Journal
Welfare Problems in Cattle, Pigs, and Sheep that Persist Even Though Scientific Research Clearly Shows How to Prevent Them
Next Article in Special Issue
Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetics of Salicylic Acid Following Intravenous and Oral Administration of Sodium Salicylate in Sheep
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valence and Intensity of Video Stimuli of Dogs and Conspecifics in Sheep: Approach-Avoidance, Operant Response, and Attention
Article

The Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Goats

1
Laboratorio di Benessere animale, Etologia Applicata e Produzioni Sostenibili, Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Instituto Superior Técnico, Centre for Management Studies, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
4
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Polo Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2018, 8(7), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070123
Received: 28 May 2018 / Revised: 16 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 July 2018 / Published: 19 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Emotion)
The use of feasible indicators to evaluate animals’ emotional states in farm animals is strongly encouraged for welfare assessment. The inclusion of qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA) in on-farm protocols has been constantly increasing during the last few years; but its association with other welfare measures has been scarcely investigated so far. In the present study; we investigated whether QBA shows a meaningful coherence with other measures included in the AWIN (Animal Welfare Indicators) welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats. We confirmed that QBA can clearly discern mood (from Agitated/Alert to Content/Relaxed) and the level of activity (from Bored to Lively) in goats. Furthermore; goats with a shiny hair coat seem more relaxed and sociable than goats with a poor hair coat condition. In contrast; farms where the workload for the stockperson is high have goats that were observed as more bored and suffering; probably because farmers do not invest enough time in taking care of their animals. Even though we found only few relations between QBA and the other measures of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol; the holistic approach of QBA can be useful to integrate the assessment and give a different perspective on the complexity of animals’ emotions and overall welfare state.
This research investigated whether using qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA) with a fixed list of descriptors may be related to quantitative animal- (ABM) and resource-based (RBM) measures included in the AWIN (Animal Welfare Indicators) welfare assessment prototype protocol for goats, tested in 60 farms. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on QBA descriptors; then PCs were correlated to some ABMs and RBMs. Subsequently, a combined PCA merged QBA scores, ABMs and RBMs. The study confirms that QBA can identify the differences in goats’ emotions, but only few significant correlations were found with ABMs and RBMs. In addition, the combined PCA revealed that goats with a normal hair coat were scored as more relaxed and sociable. A high farm workload was related to bored and suffering goats, probably because farmers that can devote less time to animals may fail to recognise important signals from them. Goats were scored as sociable, but also alert, in response to the presence of an outdoor run, probably because when outdoors they received more stimuli than indoors and were more attentive to the surroundings. Notwithstanding these results, the holistic approach of QBA may allow to register animals’ welfare from a different perspective and be complementary to other measures. View Full-Text
Keywords: dairy goats; Qualitative Behaviour Assessment; emotion; welfare assessment protocol; welfare indicators dairy goats; Qualitative Behaviour Assessment; emotion; welfare assessment protocol; welfare indicators
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Battini, M.; Barbieri, S.; Vieira, A.; Can, E.; Stilwell, G.; Mattiello, S. The Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Goats. Animals 2018, 8, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070123

AMA Style

Battini M, Barbieri S, Vieira A, Can E, Stilwell G, Mattiello S. The Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Goats. Animals. 2018; 8(7):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Battini, Monica; Barbieri, Sara; Vieira, Ana; Can, Edna; Stilwell, George; Mattiello, Silvana. 2018. "The Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Goats" Animals 8, no. 7: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070123

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop