Next Article in Journal
Prevailing Clusters of Canine Behavioural Traits in Historical US Demand for Dog Breeds (1926–2005)
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Foaming Disinfectants and Cleaners to Reduce Aerobic Bacteria and Salmonella on Poultry Transport Coops
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Conditions Associated with Marine Lipid-Induced Milk Fat Depression in Sheep Cause Shifts in the In Vitro Ruminal Metabolism of 1-13C Oleic Acid

1
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña, CSIC-Universidad de León, Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Leon, Grulleros, Spain
2
Interdepartmental Research Service (SIdI), Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Calle Francisco Tomás y Valiente 7, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2018, 8(11), 196; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110196
Submission received: 19 October 2018 / Revised: 29 October 2018 / Accepted: 31 October 2018 / Published: 3 November 2018

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Dairy ewes, just like cows, suffer from the low-fat milk syndrome, also known as milk fat depression (MFD), when marine lipids are added to their diet to modulate milk fatty acid (FA) profile. Alterations in the ruminal metabolism of dietary unsaturated FA seem to be at the core of this MFD but its causative agent has not yet been confirmed. Although some alterations may derive from shifts in oleic acid metabolism, methodological constraints represent a major challenge: the fact that oleic and other dietary FA (e.g., linoleic and linolenic acids) have common intermediates hampers the identification of those metabolites deriving specifically from each one. Thus, we conducted an in vitro trial combining an isotopic tracer approach with the use of rumen inoculum from ewes fed a diet supplemented or not with fish oil (which is known to cause MFD in dairy animals), to provide new insights into shifts in oleic acid metabolism. Fish oil altered the relative contribution of specific pathways, with relevant increments in oxygenated FA, including a major candidate milk fat inhibitor (10-oxo-18:0). Changes in the concentration of trans 18:1 intermediates were also observed. Results are discussed in the context of their potential association with milk fat depression.

Abstract

Shifts in ruminal oleic acid (OA) metabolism have received little research attention but recent studies have suggested their association with marine lipid-induced milk fat depression (MFD) in ewes and cows. Measurement of specific products of OA within the complex mixture of digesta lipids is however challenging. Therefore, this in vitro trial combined the isotopic labelling technique with the use of rumen inoculum from cannulated sheep fed a diet supplemented or not with 2% of fish oil (which has been demonstrated to cause MFD in dairy ruminants) to characterize the metabolism of OA in response to ruminal alterations associated with MFD. The products of 13C-OA after 24 h of incubation were analysed by gas chromatography-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS). Numerous 13C-labeled 18:1 intermediates and oxygenated FA were detected and no elongation or desaturation of 13OA occurred. Diet supplementation with fish oil (i.e., MFD conditions) resulted in no unique metabolites of 13OA but in relevant changes in the relative contribution of specific metabolic pathways. The inhibition of 18:0 saturation caused by this treatment appeared largely attributable to increased oxygenated FA proportion, in particular the candidate milk fat inhibitor 10-oxo-18:0, and warrants further research on the association between MFD and oxygenated FA. Changes in the concentration of 13C-labeled trans 18:1 intermediates but not in cis 18:1, were also observed.

1. Introduction

Milk fat depression (MFD) is a challenging biological problem characterized by a severe reduction of milk fat content, generally with no changes in milk yield or other components [1]. This reduction has been associated with the use of feeding strategies aimed at modulating milk fatty acid (FA) profile or sustaining high milk yields in dairy ruminants [2,3]. The economic value of milk fat and the associated losses during MFD justifies the emphasis laid on understanding the causes of this syndrome [3,4].
The MFD induced in cows by the consumption of plant oils or starch-rich diets, which is explained by shifts in ruminal biohydrogenation (BH) pathways that favour the accumulation of the antilipogenic trans-10 cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) [2,3], is the most-widely studied MFD condition. However, although MFD induced by dietary marine lipid supplements was first described more than one century ago [1], its causative agent has not yet been confirmed [5,6]. Alterations of BH pathways are also presumed to be at the core of this type of MFD but extensive research has shown little or no change in trans-10 cis-12 CLA in response to fish oil and microalgae [2,7,8].
Marine lipid-induced changes in digesta FA profile are characterized by large decreases in 18:0 accumulation and opposite variations in most 18:1 and 18:2 intermediates and in some oxygenated FA [6,8,9]. The most prominent among them would be those occurring in recently proposed candidate milk fat inhibitors, such as cis-11 18:1, trans-10 cis-15 18:2 and 10-oxo-18:0 [6,9,10]. Some of these changes would be associated with shifts in the BH of α-linolenic acid, as reported in a recent in vitro study [11] but some others, particularly variations in 18:1 and oxygenated FA, may derive from alterations in the metabolism of oleic acid (OA) in the rumen [12,13]. In this regard, supplementation with OA-rich lipids has been reported to induce MFD in dairy cows [14,15,16] and, combined with fish oil, to decrease milk fat concentration and yield to a greater extent than a blend of this marine lipid and a source of α-linolenic acid [17]. Nevertheless, ruminal OA metabolism has received little attention, which might be due, at least to some extent, to methodological constraints: the fact that OA and other dietary unsaturated FA have common intermediates hampers the identification of those specifically derived from each one [3,18]. The isotopic labelling technique would offer a clear advantage to overcome this obstacle by measuring the products of a given tracer within the complex mixture of digesta lipids.
On this basis, we conducted an in vitro study with 13C-labeled OA to characterize its ruminal metabolism in ewes. Furthermore, we compared the use of rumen inocula from sheep fed a diet either without lipid supplementation or supplemented with 2% of fish oil (which has been demonstrated to decrease milk fat concentration by approximately 25% in this species) [6,19,20] with the aim of investigating the shifts in the ruminal metabolism of OA associated with marine lipid-induced MFD.

2. Materials and Methods

This experiment is an integral part of a larger study using stable isotopes (namely 13C-labeled FA) to provide new insights into ruminal BH. A first paper on the in vitro BH of 13C α-linolenic acid has recently been published [11] and contains detailed information about diets and rumen inocula composition that will therefore be only mentioned briefly in this new article.

2.1. Donor Animals

All protocols involving animals were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (code 100102/2017-7, 8 January 2018), the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC; code 649/2018, 17 January 2018) and the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain), following proceedings described in Spanish and EU legislations (R.D. 53/2013 and Council Directive 2010/63/EU). All animals used in this study were handled in strict accordance with good clinical practices and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Five rumen-cannulated dry ewes (BW = 65.5 ± 2.28 kg) were used as rumen inocula donors for the batch cultures of microorganisms, which were conducted as described previously [11,21]. Sheep were randomly divided into two groups and fed a total mixed ration (TMR) with no lipid supplementation (to obtain the control inoculum; 3 ewes) or supplemented with 2% dry matter (DM) of fish oil (to obtain the FO-MFD inoculum; 2 ewes).
The basal TMR was formulated with a forage:concentrate ratio 50:50 from dehydrated alfalfa hay and a concentrate of whole corn and barley grains, soybean meal, sugar beet pulp, molasses and minerals and vitamins. It contained (on a DM basis) 18.7% of crude protein and 29.2% of neutral detergent fibre. In the supplemented diet, the fish oil (Afampes 121 DHA; Afamsa, Mos, Spain) replaced other dietary ingredients on a proportionate basis. The FA composition of both diets (% of total FA, data for control and supplemented TMR, respectively) included mainly 16:0 (22.6 vs. 21.7), cis-9 18:1 (14.8 vs. 14.5), 18:2n-6 (40.1 vs. 22.8) and 18:3n-3 (13.2 vs. 7.2), while EPA (3.3), DPA (0.7) and DHA (9.3) were only detected in the fish oil diet. Please see Toral et al. [11] for details.
Experimental diets were offered once daily at 1.2 times their estimated maintenance energy requirements [22]. Clean drinking water was always available.

2.2. Batch Cultures of Rumen Microorganisms

After sheep were fed the experimental diets for 21 days, we collected individual rumen fluids via the cannula before feeding. They were taken in thermal flasks to the laboratory and strained through a nylon membrane (250 µm; Fisher Scientific S.L., Madrid, Spain) under continuous flushing with CO2. Equal volumes of the strained rumen fluid obtained from each ewe were combined by treatments (i.e., control and FO-MFD) and used as the inoculum in the incubations.
The incubations were conducted in 16-mL Hungate tubes containing 12 mL of a mix (1:4) of the corresponding rumen inoculum and a phosphate-bicarbonate buffer [23]. An amount of 0.75 mg of 13OA ([1-13C] cis-9 18:1, 99% atom 13C%; CLM-149-PK, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Tewksbury, MA, USA), equivalent to 1% of substrate DM, was dosed into each Hungate tube. To facilitate the dosing, this 13OA had been dissolved in hexane, the solution being added to the tubes and evaporated to dryness under a steady stream of nitrogen. Then, the basal diet fed to the ewes on the control treatment (ground in a hammer-mill fitted with a 0.5 mm screen) was used as the substrate and weighed into each tube (6.25 mg DM/mL of buffered rumen fluid). To determine the natural levels of 13FA in the digesta samples, we used another set of tubes with 12OA (≥99%; O1008; Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) instead of 13OA, which was prepared following the same procedures.
The collection of the rumen inocula and the batch cultures were repeated on 3 different days (3 runs) and tubes with labelled and unlabelled OA were always incubated in duplicate under anaerobic conditions in an incubator set at 39.5 °C [2 inocula (control and FO-MFD) × 3 days × 2 OA (labelled and unlabelled) × 2 duplicates]. Incubations lasted for 24 h (when, according to previous preliminary assays, effects mimic those observed in vivo and were well detected) and the reaction was stopped by placing the tubes into ice-water for approximately 5 min. All the material was then frozen at −80 °C, freeze-dried and stored again at −80 °C until FA analysis.

2.3. Chemical Analyses

To determine the FA composition of the ruminal digesta in the Hungate tubes (which contained approx. 200 mg of freeze-dried digesta), we first extracted the lipids using 4 mL of a mixture of hexane and isopropanol (3:2, vol/vol) [24]. Extractions were repeated, and organic extracts were combined, dried at 45 °C under nitrogen and converted to FA methyl esters (FAME) by sequential base-acid catalysed transesterification [9]. Methyl esters were separated and quantified by GC-FID (Agilent 7890A GC System, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a 100-m fused silica capillary column (CP-SIL 88, CP7489, Varian Ibérica S.A., Madrid, Spain) and hydrogen as the carrier gas. Total FAME profile was analysed using a temperature gradient program and then isothermal conditions at 170 °C to further resolve 18:1 isomers [24]. All peaks were identified based on retention time comparisons with commercially available FAME standards (from Sigma-Aldrich; Larodan, Solna, Sweden; and Nu-Chek Prep., Elysian, MN, USA), cross referencing with chromatograms reported in the literature [24,25] and comparison with reference ruminal digesta samples for which the FA composition was determined based on GC-FID analysis of FAME and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of corresponding 4,4-dimethyloxazoline derivatives [21,25].
Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) was conducted using a gas chromatography-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry system (GC-C-IRMS; Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) comprising a Trace GC Ultra gas chromatograph coupled to a Delta V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer through a GC Combustion III interface maintained at 940 °C. To separate the FAME, we used the same CP-SIL 88 column and the isothermal program employed in GC-FID analysis, with helium as the carrier gas. The 13C% in the methanol employed for FA transesterification was determined with a FlashEA 1112-HT elemental analyser coupled to a Delta V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer through a Conflo III interface (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Methanol was placed in tin capsules and combustion was done at 1020 °C, with helium as the carrier gas.

2.4. Calculations and Statistical Analyses

The percentage of FA originating from the incubated 13OA was calculated as explained by Toral et al. [11]. First, the 13C% in the methanol was used to correct for the isotopic shift due to the extra methyl group in 13C-labeled FAME that were detected during GC-C-IRMS analysis. Second, to account for the natural levels of 13C, the 13C% of each FA measured in batch cultures with 12OA was subtracted from the respective 13C% in incubations with 13OA. For each fatty acid, the corrected 13C % determined by GC-C-IRMS and its relative proportion over total FA measured by GC-FID were used to determine the amount of the FA that would actually derive from the incubated 13OA.
The FA composition of ruminal digesta was analysed by a two-way ANOVA to test the fixed effects of inoculum type (control vs. FO-MFD), OA isotope (12OA vs. 13OA) and their interaction. For FA found exclusively in the FO-MFD treatment, the fixed effects due to OA isotope and inoculum by isotope interaction were removed. Enrichment data were analysed by a one-way ANOVA to test the fixed effect of the inoculum type. In both cases, the incubation run was designated as the random effect. Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and considered a trend towards significance at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10. Statistical analyses were conducted using the SAS software package (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Fatty Acid Composition of the Digesta

Inoculum type had a clear effect on the lipid composition of the digesta, whereas changes due to OA isotope were marginal and no significant differences were detected for the inoculum by isotope interaction (Table 1).
The large reduction in 18:0 concentration in the FO-MFD treatment (−47%; p < 0.001) was accompanied by significant increases in most 18:1 and 18:2 isomers, such as cis-11, trans-10 or trans-11 18:1 and trans-9 cis-12 or trans-11 cis-15 18:2. However, the concentration of cis-9 18:1 and 18:2n-6 were lower than in the control (−25% and −36%, respectively; p < 0.001). Differences due to the effect of FO-MFD inoculum were also found in the proportion of oxygenated FA, with a large increment in 10-oxo-18:0 and reductions in 13- and 16-oxo-18:0 (p < 0.05). Similarly, the profile of even-, odd- and branched-chain FA with less than 18 carbon atoms, such as 16:0, 17:0 or iso 17:0, was affected by inoculum type (p < 0.05). Very long-chain FA present in the fish oil and their BH intermediates were more abundant (p < 0.05) or could only be detected in FO-MFD treatment (e.g., total 20:1, EPA and DHA).
The few significant differences between incubations with 12OA and 13OA were limited to a lower proportion of OA in the latter (−12.5%; p < 0.001) and the opposite change in trans-13 + 14 and trans-15 18:1 and 9-oxo-18:0 + 10-OH-18:0 (p < 0.10). The concentration of EPA was marginally higher in incubations with 13OA (p < 0.05).

3.2. Ruminal Metabolism of 13OA

Table 2 shows the proportion of 13C-labeled FA detected in digesta at the end of the incubation, expressed as % of the initial 13OA. At that moment (end of incubation), the concentration of this isotopic tracer was lower in batch cultures with rumen fluid from ewes fed the fish oil diet than in the control, representing on average 12.7 and 17.2% of the incubated amount, respectively (p < 0.05). Therefore, a mean of 87.3 and 82.8% of the initial 13OA had disappeared in the FO-MFD and control treatments, respectively.
The major 13C-labeled product was always 18:0, although the FO-MFD treatment decreased its concentration by 16% (p < 0.05). The other 20 chromatographic peaks showing 13C enrichment over the natural levels were also identified as 18-carbon intermediates, specifically oxygenated FA and 18:1 isomers. No traces of labelling were detected in C18 PUFA or in FA with shorter or longer carbon chain length.
Among oxygenated FA, 10-oxo-18:0 was the most abundant product of 13OA, representing 2.2 and 14.7% of total 13C enrichment in the control and FO-MFD cultures, respectively (p < 0.05). The increase in the latter was accompanied by other relevant increments in 13- and 15-oxo-18:0 (p < 0.05), whereas 9-oxo-18:0 + 10-OH-18:0 remained unaffected by the fish oil supplementation (p > 0.10).
Inoculum type also had relevant effects on the profile of 18:1 isomers and the concentration of trans 18:1 isomers was generally greater in incubations with rumen fluid from ewes fed the fish oil diet. Significant increases ranged 50–63% for trans-6 + 7 + 8 to trans-12 18:1 intermediates and averaged 20% for trans-15 + cis-10 18:1 (p < 0.10). Conversely, the concentration of trans-16 + cis-14 18:1 decreased in FO-MFD incubations (p < 0.05). Other 13C-labeled 18:1 isomers (i.e., the abundant trans-13 + 14 18:1 and the minor trans-4, trans-5 and cis 18:1) were not affected by inoculum type (p > 0.10).

4. Discussion

Early investigations assumed that OA was metabolized in the rumen in a single step that led to 18:0 formation [26] but in vitro trials using isotopic tracers have shown that, under standard feeding conditions, OA metabolism yields numerous 18:1 intermediates [13,27]. However, no information was available on the fate of OA in response to the shifts in ruminal FA metabolism associated with marine lipid-induced MFD, which would be crucial to explain the origin of this syndrome [2,3,6]. Therefore, in this study we tried to mimic these alterations by incubating 13C-labeled OA with rumen inocula collected from ewes fed a diet supplemented with fish oil that was known to cause MFD in dairy ewes [6,19].
The diversity of 13OA products detected in our trial was greater than that in earlier studies using the same isotopic tracer, which described 18:1 intermediates with double bonds in trans-5 to trans-16 and in cis-11 to cis-16 positions, 10-OH-18:0 and 10-oxo-18:0 [12,13,28]. Compared with the usual GC-MS analysis, the greater sensitivity offered by the GC-C-IRMS methodology would be key to detect FA isotopes at low abundance levels [29] and, in our conditions, enabled the identification of some additional intermediates, such as trans-4 18:1, 13-oxo-18:0 and 15-oxo-18:0. The detection of 13C-labeled oxygenated FA was particularly important because they included a major metabolite (10-oxo-18:0) that accounted for almost 15% of the 13C enrichment in FO-MFD cultures. Remarkably, there is a scarcity of data in the literature about oxygenated FA of ruminal origin [10,21,30], which might be explained by their long retention times under standard chromatographic conditions and their consequent elution in less-well explored regions of the chromatogram [9]. For example, with a widely used 100-m polar column (CP-SIL 88) and the temperature gradient program described by Shingfield et al. [24], all oxo-18:0 metabolites eluted after 22:6n-3, the last of the very long chain PUFA that is usually quantified [5,9]. The fact the oxygenated FA are not usually present in feeds (please see Toral et al. [11] for a detailed FA composition of our diets) may also account for the limited research attention received by these products of ruminal microbiota [12,30].
Despite a thorough exploration of GC-C-IRMS chromatograms searching for traces of 13C enrichment, the FO-MFD treatment resulted in no unique metabolites but in relevant alterations in the accumulation of 13C-labeled FA. These findings are consistent with previous results from our trial examining the BH of 13C α-linolenic acid [11] and suggest that ruminal OA metabolism would follow the same pathways under standard (control) and FO-MFD conditions, although important differences in the relative contribution of each specific route exist.
Differences in the FA profile of digesta (Table 1) were consistent with other in vitro and in vivo trials describing the ruminal response to marine lipids [21,24,31]. Variations in some FA would be explained by their supply with the fish oil (e.g., 14:0, 16:1 or 20- and 22-carbon FA) [7,31] or by potential shifts in rumen microbial groups that synthesize them (e.g., odd- and branched-chain FA) [32]. Increases in conjugated and non-conjugated 18:2 intermediates, including some antilipogenic FA [2,3] would be common responses to marine lipids [8,31,33]. However, no 18:2 or 20- and 22-carbon FA was identified as a product of 13OA metabolism, supporting the hypothesis that rumen bacteria would not desaturate or elongate 18-carbon FA [11,34,35]. The lower concentration of 18:2n-6 in the FO-MFD treatment is consistent with the favourable effect of fish oil supplementation on the BH extent of dietary PUFA in the rumen [6,36,37].
Incubations with the FO-MFD inoculum enhanced OA disappearance too. The similarity of the reductions in OA proportion in 13C-labeled FA and in total FA in digesta (−26 and −25%, respectively) would indicate that fish oil had comparable effects on the metabolism of the 12C- and 13C-isotopes of OA, although some little differences have been reported (e.g., in trans-15 18:1 accumulation) [13]. The lack of variation in digesta FA (Table 1) due to the inoculum by isotope interaction further supports that the impact of fish oil would be similarly detected with both OA isotopes, which is crucial in our study.
The isotope analysis supports the hypothesis that marine lipids increase the extent of OA biohydrogenation [10,36], although some reports in the literature suggested no effects or even decreases in this parameter [31,37]. In this regard, it could be speculated that inconsistent results between studies not relying on isotopic tracer methodology could be accounted for by differences in dietary FA profiles, given that OA may be a BH intermediate of linoleic and linolenic acids [38,39]. Nevertheless, in the study by Toral et al. [11], the FO-MFD treatment also inhibited the accumulation of OA produced from the BH of 13C-linolenic acid. Other factors (e.g., ruminant species, interactions with basal diet composition or coelution with trans 18:1 in chromatography analysis) may then contribute to explain the erratic impact of marine lipids on ruminal OA proportion reported in the literature. Furthermore, the use of OA as a free FA or as part of triglycerides (i.e., readily available for microbial biohydrogenation or requiring previous lipolysis, respectively) [18] might also influence the response to marine lipids. In any event, the involvement of these changes in MFD might be limited, because the putative relevance of decreased OA availability for milk fat synthesis has been downplayed in dairy ewes [20].
Other effects of FO-MFD treatment on digesta composition differed between total and 13C-labeled FA (Table 1 and Table 2, respectively), which may help to improve our understanding of the complex BH of dietary FA [3,18]. Specifically, the comparison between changes in the concentration of 13C products and of total FA in digesta might help estimate the contribution of OA to ruminal alterations associated with marine lipid-induced MFD, including the production of candidate milk fat inhibitors [6,8,10].
For example, the lower decrease in the proportion of 13C-18:0 than of total 18:0 in digesta (−16 and −47%, respectively) suggests a lower contribution of OA metabolism to the inhibitory effect of marine lipids on the last BH step, compared with other dietary unsaturated FA such as linoleic and α-linolenic acids [10,11]. This might be explained, at least to some extent, by the putative high relevance of direct OA saturation to 18:0, without previous isomerization to trans 18:1 [18]. Marine lipids are strong inhibitors of trans 18:1 saturation in the rumen, probably through changes in microbial composition [31] but there is limited information on their impact on cis double bonds [11,21,33]. In any event, the decrease in 13C-18:0 proportion from 70.0 to 58.7% does not seem to be entirely attributable to greater cis and trans 18:1 accumulation. In fact, OA percentage was reduced in FO-MFD incubations, as discussed above, whereas other individual cis 18:1 isomers remained unaffected by inoculum type and total trans 18:1 concentration only increased 2.8 percentage points. Therefore, the key metabolites that appear to explain the shift in 18:0 production would be oxygenated FA, in particular 10-oxo-18:0, which increased from 2.2 to 14.7% of 13C-labeled FA.
Oxygenated FA seem to be final products of alternative FA metabolic pathways in the rumen, which involve sequential hydration and oxidation steps [12,40]. The rumen accumulation of 10-oxo-18:0 was previously related to OA input in the diet [12]. The greater proportion of this oxylipid in 13C-labeled products than in total FA in digesta, together with the similar fold-change due to FO-MFD treatment in both cases, supports that OA would be its main precursor. However, 13-oxo-18:0 and 15-oxo-18:0 were less abundant in 13OA products than in total FA in digesta and showed inconsistent responses to inoculum type, probably because they are major intermediates of other unsaturated FA, such as 18:2n-6 [40,41].
A potential association between 10-oxo-18:0 and marine lipid-induced MFD has been suggested in recent studies [5,20] but there is no conclusive evidence to confirm a cause and effect relationship. Because other oxylipids derived from unsaturated FA may have biological activity in dairy ruminants (e.g., 13-oxo-octadecadienoic and 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acids) [42], further research would be advisable to evaluate the effects of 10-oxo-18:0 on mammary lipogenesis. On the contrary, the association between 13- and 15-oxo-18:0 and MFD, if any, appears less relevant [5,6].
As mentioned above, variations in the proportion of 13C-labeled cis and trans 18:1 isomers were quantitatively lower than those described for oxygenated FA but some 18:1 isomers have biological effects and might be involved in marine lipid-induced MFD. For example, cis-11 18:1 has been proposed as a candidate milk fat inhibitor [5,19] based on its antilipogenic effect on bovine adipocytes [43]. However, its inconsistent variation in 13C-labeled FA and in total FA in digesta may indicate that that its increments are due to its presence in the fish oil and not to OA metabolism, in line with results from 13C α-linolenic acid incubation [11]. The similar lack of relationship for other cis 18:1 would also imply that OA did not contribute to their response to FO-MFD treatment.
On the other hand, our results would show that OA is a major precursor of some trans 18:1 intermediates regardless of inoculum type, such as trans-6 + 7 + 8, trans-9 and trans-13 + 14 18:1, which were less abundant in total digesta lipids than in 13OA products (Table 1 and Table 2, respectively), whereas the opposite was observed for trans-11 18:1. These results are in general agreement with previous studies using isotopic tracers [13,27] or oleic-rich lipid supplements [15,17,44]. However, although 13OA would not be a major precursor of trans-11 18:1, FO-MFD treatment favoured this BH pathway in the same proportion as that leading to trans-10 18:1 accumulation, which prevented a trans-11 to trans-10 18:1 shift in our conditions. A similar output was reported by Toral et al. [11]. In this regard, the relevance of the trans-11 to trans-10 shift as an effective marker of ruminal alterations associated with fish oil-induced milk fat depression seems minor in dairy ewes compared with cows [6,10,19].

5. Conclusions

Under the conditions of this research, the in vitro ruminal metabolism of 13OA yields numerous 18:1 intermediates, with double bonds in trans-4 to trans-16 and in cis-10 to cis-16 positions, and oxygenated products (9-oxo-18:0 + 10-OH-18:0 and 10-, 13- and 15-oxo-18:0). However, no desaturation to 18:2 or elongation to FA with 20 or 22 carbons takes place. Diet supplementation with fish oil (i.e., MFD conditions) results in no unique metabolites but in relevant changes in the relative contribution of specific metabolic pathways. The inhibition of 18:0 saturation caused by this treatment appears largely attributable to increased oxygenated FA proportion, in particular the candidate milk fat inhibitor 10-oxo-18:0, and warrants further research on the association between MFD and oxygenated FA. Changes in the concentration of 13C-labeled trans 18:1 intermediates but not in cis 18:1, are also observed.

Author Contributions

Conceived, designed and performed the trial, P.F., G.H. and P.G.T.; analysed the data, V.P., G.H. and P.G.T.; wrote the paper, P.G.T. and P.F.; provided advice and critically reviewed the manuscript, G.H. and V.P. All authors approved the final version.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO; AGL2017-87812). P. G. Toral benefits from a Ramón y Cajal research contract from the MINECO (RYC-2015-17230). Co-funding by the European Regional Development Fund is also acknowledged.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge A.G. Mendoza, A. Belenguer (CSIC, Spain), R. Sedano and R. Redondo (Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain) for their assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bauman, D.E.; Griinari, J.M. Regulation and nutritional manipulation of milk fat: Low-fat milk syndrome. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 70, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harvatine, K.J.; Boisclair, Y.R.; Bauman, D.E. Recent advances in the regulation of milk fat synthesis. Animal 2009, 3, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shingfield, K.J.; Bernard, L.; Leroux, C.; Chilliard, Y. Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants. Animal 2010, 4, 1140–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Palmquist, D.L.; Jenkins, T.C. A 100-Year Review: Fat feeding of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 10061–10077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kairenius, P.; Ärölä, A.; Leskinen, H.; Toivonen, V.; Ahvenjärvi, S.; Vanhatalo, A.; Huhtanen, P.; Hurme, T.; Griinari, J.M.; Shingfield, K.J. Dietary fish oil supplements depress milk fat yield and alter milk fatty acid composition in lactating cows fed grass silage based diets. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5653–5672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Frutos, P.; Toral, P.G.; Belenguer, A.; Hervás, G. Milk fat depression in dairy ewes fed fish oil: Might differences in rumen biohydrogenation, fermentation, or bacterial community explain the individual variation? J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6122–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Loor, J.J.; Doreau, M.; Chardigny, J.M.; Ollier, A.; Sebedio, J.L.; Chilliard, Y. Effects of ruminal or duodenal supply of fish oil on milk fat secretion and profiles of trans-fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid isomers in dairy cows fed maize silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 119, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boeckaert, C.; Fievez, V.; Van Hecke, D.; Verstraete, W.; Boon, N. Changes in rumen biohydrogenation intermediates and ciliate protozoa diversity after algae supplementation to dairy cattle. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2007, 109, 767–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kairenius, P.; Toivonen, V.; Shingfield, K.J. Identification and ruminal outflow of long-chain fatty acid biohydrogenation intermediates in cows fed diets containing fish oil. Lipids 2011, 46, 587–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kairenius, P.; Leskinen, H.; Toivonen, V.; Muetzel, S.; Ahvenjärvi, S.; Vanhatalo, A.; Huhtanen, P.; Wallace, R.J.; Shingfield, K.J. Effect of dietary fish oil supplements alone or in combination with sunflower and linseed oil on ruminal lipid metabolism and bacterial populations in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3021–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Toral, P.G.; Hervás, G.; Frutos, P. In vitro biohydrogenation of 13C-labeled α-linolenic acid in response to ruminal alterations associated with diet-induced milk fat depression in ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jenkins, T.C.; AbuGhazaleh, A.A.; Freeman, S.; Thies, E.J. The production of 10-hydroxystearic and 10-ketostearic acids is an alternative route of oleic acid transformation by the ruminal microbiota in cattle. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 926–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mosley, E.E.; Nudda, A.; Corato, A.; Rossi, E.; Jenkins, T.; McGuire, M.A. Differential biohydrogenation and isomerization of [U-13C]oleic and [1-13C]oleic acids by mixed ruminal microbes. Lipids 2006, 41, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bayourthe, C.; Enjalbert, F.; Moncoulon, R. Effects of different forms of canola oil fatty acids plus canola meal on milk composition and physical properties of butter. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rego, O.A.; Alves, S.P.; Antunes, L.M.S.; Rosa, H.J.D.; Alfaia, C.F.M.; Prates, J.A.M.; Cabrita, A.R.J.; Fonseca, A.J.M.; Bessa, R.J.B. Rumen biohydrogenation-derived fatty acids in milk fat from grazing dairy cows supplemented with rapeseed, sunflower, or linseed oils. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 4530–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vafa, T.S.; Naserian, A.A.; Moussavi, A.R.H.; Valizadeh, R.; Mesgaran, M.D. Effect of supplementation of fish and canola oil in the diet on milk fatty acid composition in early lactating Holstein cows. Asian Austral. J. Anim. 2012, 25, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. AbuGhazaleh, A.A.; Schingoethe, D.J.; Hippen, A.R.; Kalscheur, K.F. Conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in rumen, plasma, and milk of cows fed fish oil and fats differing in saturation of 18 carbon fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 3648–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jenkins, T.C.; Wallace, R.J.; Moate, P.J.; Mosley, E.E. Board-invited review: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carreño, D.; Hervás, G.; Toral, P.G.; Castro-Carrera, T.; Frutos, P. Fish oil-induced milk fat depression and associated downregulation of mammary lipogenic genes in dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 7971–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Toral, P.G.; Hervás, G.; Frutos, P. Use of high doses of 18:0 to try to mitigate the syndrome of milk fat depression in dairy ewes fed marine lipids. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 236, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Toral, P.G.; Hervás, G.; Carreño, D.; Leskinen, H.; Belenguer, A.; Shingfield, K.J.; Frutos, P. In vitro response to EPA, DPA, and DHA: Comparison of effects on ruminal fermentation and biohydrogenation of 18-carbon fatty acids in cows and ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 6187–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. INRA. Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins. Besoins des Animaux: Valeur des Aliments. Tables INRA 2007; INRA: Versailles, France, 2007; ISBN 978-2-7592-0873-9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Goering, M.K.; Van Soest, P.J. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications); Agric. Handbook No. 379; ARS-USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1970.
  24. Shingfield, K.J.; Ahvenjärvi, S.; Toivonen, V.; Äröla, A.; Nurmela, K.V.V.; Huhtanen, P.; Griinari, J.M. Effect of dietary fish oil on biohydrogenation of fatty acids and milk fatty acid content in cows. Anim. Sci. 2003, 77, 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  25. Toral, P.G.; Hervás, G.; Leskinen, H.; Shingfield, K.J.; Frutos, P. In vitro ruminal biohydrogenation of eicosapentaenoic (EPA), docosapentaenoic (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in cows and ewes: Intermediate metabolites and pathways. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6109–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Harfoot, C.G.; Hazlewood, G.P. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem; Hobson, P.N., Stewart, C.S., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997; pp. 382–426. ISBN 978-94-009-1453-7. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mosley, E.E.; Powell, G.L.; Riley, M.B.; Jenkins, T.C. Microbial biohydrogenation of oleic acid to trans isomers in vitro. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. AbuGhazaleh, A.A.; Riley, M.B.; Thies, E.E.; Jenkins, T.C. Dilution rate and pH effects on the conversion of oleic acid to trans C-18:1 positional isomers in continuous culture. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 4334–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meier-Augenstein, W. Applied gas chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 842, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kitessa, S.M.; Gulati, S.K.; Ashes, J.R.; Fleck, E.; Scott, T.W.; Nichols, P.D. Utilisation of fish oil in ruminants—I. Fish oil metabolism in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 89, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, E.J.; Huws, S.A.; Lee, M.R.F.; Wood, J.D.; Muetzel, S.M.; Wallace, R.J.; Scollan, N.D. Fish oil increases the duodenal flow of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and trans-11 18:1 and decreases 18:0 in steers via changes in the rumen bacterial community. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fievez, V.; Colman, E.; Castro-Montoya, J.M.; Stefanov, I.; Vlaeminck, B. Milk odd- and branched-chain fatty acids as biomarkers of rumen function—An update. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 172, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Or-Rashid, M.M.; Kramer, J.K.G.; Wood, M.A.; McBride, B.W. Supplemental algal meal alters the ruminal trans-18:1 fatty acid and conjugated linoleic acid composition in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Proell, J.M.; Mosley, E.E.; Powell, G.L.; Jenkins, T.C. Isomerization of stable isotopically labeled elaidic acid to cis and trans monoenes by ruminal microbes. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 2072–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, Y.-J.; Jenkins, T.C. Identification of enriched conjugated linoleic acid isomers in cultures of ruminal microorganisms after dosing with 1-13C-linoleic acid. J. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, M.R.F.; Shingfield, K.J.; Tweed, J.K.S.; Toivonen, V.; Huws, S.A.; Scollan, N.D. Effect of fish oil on ruminal biohydrogenation of C18 unsaturated fatty acids in steers fed grass or red clover silages. Animal 2008, 2, 1859–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shingfield, K.J.; Lee, M.R.F.; Humphries, D.J.; Scollan, N.D.; Toivonen, V.; Beever, D.E.; Reynolds, C.K. Effect of linseed oil and fish oil alone or as an equal mixture on ruminal fatty acid metabolism in growing steers fed maize silage-based diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 3728–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Jouany, J.P.; Lassalas, B.; Doreau, M.; Glasser, F. Dynamic features of the rumen metabolism of linoleic acid, linolenic acid and linseed oil measured in vitro. Lipids 2007, 42, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Honkanen, A.M.; Griinari, J.M.; Vanhatalo, A.; Ahvenjärvi, S.; Toivonen, V.; Shingfield, K.J. Characterization of the disappearance and formation of biohydrogenation intermediates during incubations of linoleic acid with rumen fluid in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 1376–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hudson, J.A.; Cai, Y.; Corner, R.J.; Morvan, B.; Joblin, K.N. Identification and enumeration of oleic acid and linoleic acid hydrating bacteria in the rumen of sheep and cows. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Hudson, J.A.; Morvan, B.; Jobli, K.N. Hydration of linoleic acid by bacteria isolated from ruminants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 169, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sordillo, L.M. Symposium review: Oxylipids and the regulation of bovine mammary inflammatory responses. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 5629–5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Burns, T.A.; Kadegowda, A.K.G.; Duckett, S.K.; Pratt, S.L.; Jenkins, T.C. Palmitoleic (16:1 cis-9) and cis-vaccenic (18:1 cis-11) acid alter lipogenesis in bovine adipocyte cultures. Lipids 2012, 47, 1143–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ollier, S.; Leroux, C.; de la Foye, A.; Bernard, L.; Rouel, J.; Chilliard, Y. Whole intact rapeseeds or sunflower oil in high-forage or high-concentrate diets affects milk yield, milk composition, and mammary gene expression profile in goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 5544–5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Effects of rumen inoculum (control vs. FO-MFD 1) and oleic acid (OA) isotope (12C vs. 13C) on the fatty acid profile of digesta (expressed as % of total fatty acids) after 24 h of in vitro incubation.
Table 1. Effects of rumen inoculum (control vs. FO-MFD 1) and oleic acid (OA) isotope (12C vs. 13C) on the fatty acid profile of digesta (expressed as % of total fatty acids) after 24 h of in vitro incubation.
Fatty AcidRumen InoculumOA Isotope p-Value
ControlFO-MFD12C13CSED 2InoculumOA IsotopeInoculum × OA Isotope
14:00.8521.3071.0971.0620.0324<0.0010.1720.547
15:01.0611.1691.1141.1160.0190<0.0010.8900.817
anteiso 15:00.5930.4740.5300.5360.0095<0.0010.4480.333
16:012.33817.65315.01414.9780.2901<0.0010.8640.944
∑ 16:1 isomers0.0940.3320.2140.2120.0410<0.0010.9600.884
17:00.8020.9390.8710.8700.0251<0.0010.9450.871
iso 17:0 0.5400.5830.5660.5570.02230.0350.6060.531
anteiso 17:00.4810.5290.5080.5020.0086<0.0010.4280.624
18:054.629.141.842.02.74<0.0010.9290.880
Oxygenated fatty acids
9-oxo-18:0 + 10-OH-18:00.0210.0290.0210.0290.00360.0200.0170.794
10-oxo-18:00.4442.7321.6001.5750.3503<0.0010.9230.779
13-oxo-18:00.2340.2010.2150.2190.01900.0410.7780.886
15-oxo-18:00.0370.0420.0380.0410.00520.2250.5450.462
16-oxo-18:00.4380.2760.3590.3550.0142<0.0010.6920.585
18:1 isomers
cis-9 18:13.2212.4213.0102.6330.0908<0.0010.0010.198
cis-11 18:10.1610.3250.2340.2520.03570.0010.4890.623
cis-12 18:10.2680.2540.2560.2670.02030.3710.4840.721
cis-13 18:10.0530.1000.0750.0780.0074<0.0010.6040.499
cis-15 18:10.2210.2830.2480.2570.01690.0020.4710.606
cis-16 18:10.1450.1770.1610.1610.00860.0020.9270.906
trans-4 18:10.1390.1360.1330.1410.01370.7770.4200.420
trans-5 18:10.0870.0850.0840.0870.00740.7030.6370.558
trans-6 + 7 + 8 18:10.6421.1040.8730.8730.0413<0.0010.9940.372
trans-9 18:10.4540.9120.6770.6890.0647<0.0010.8010.607
trans-10 18:10.6251.1560.9440.8370.11560.0010.2390.733
trans-11 18:15.60812.6929.0569.2451.1404<0.0010.8220.951
trans-12 18:10.7521.5321.1181.1650.0747<0.0010.4100.753
trans-13 + 14 18:11.8562.9272.3172.4660.0942<0.0010.0670.674
trans-15 + cis-10 18:10.9161.2891.0061.1990.0475<0.0010.0010.241
trans-16 + cis-14 18:10.8931.0550.9700.9790.06610.0140.8530.882
cis-9 cis-12 18:2 30.9670.6220.8180.7700.0695<0.0010.3620.434
trans-9 cis-12 18:20.0650.1150.0910.0900.01080.0010.8820.480
trans-11 cis-15 18:2 40.4500.5750.5130.5130.04730.0100.9920.945
trans-11 trans-15 + trans-9 trans-14 18:20.7150.7050.2130.2190.02200.0010.7150.705
cis-9 trans-11 18:2 50.3690.3750.3780.3650.02710.7640.5300.552
trans-9 cis-11 18:20.0380.0570.0470.0480.0029<0.0010.6860.205
trans-10 cis-12 18:20.0350.0630.0470.0510.00730.0020.4170.999
trans-11 trans-13 18:20.1820.0970.1440.1350.0154<0.0010.4340.259
Other trans,trans 18:2 60.3530.2470.2990.3010.0212<0.0010.8970.359
cis-9 cis-12 cis-15 18:3 + cis-11 20:10.2720.7400.5130.4990.0475<0.0010.7060.871
20:00.7311.0800.9080.9030.0465<0.0010.8990.903
∑ 20:1 isomers0.1241.1030.6150.6120.0551<0.0010.9470.820
20:5n-3-0.0430.0410.0440.0006-0.047-
22:5n-3-0.0310.0310.0300.0007-0.390-
22:6n-3-0.0550.0570.0540.0009-0.115-
1 Derived from ewes fed a diet without lipid supplementation (control inoculum) or supplemented with 2% dry matter of fish oil (FO-MFD inoculum); 2 Standard error of the difference; 3 Contains cis-12 cis-16 and trans-12 cis-15 18:2 as minor components; 4 Contains trans-10 cis-15 18:2 as a minor component; 5 Contains trans-8 cis-10 18:2 as a minor component; 6 Sum of trans-7 trans-9 + trans-8 trans-10 + trans-9 trans-11 18:2.
Table 2. Effects of rumen inoculum (control vs. FO-MFD 1) on the proportion of 13C-labeled fatty acids in digesta (expressed as % of incubated 13C oleic acid) after 24 h of in vitro incubation.
Table 2. Effects of rumen inoculum (control vs. FO-MFD 1) on the proportion of 13C-labeled fatty acids in digesta (expressed as % of incubated 13C oleic acid) after 24 h of in vitro incubation.
13C-Labeled Fatty AcidControlFO-MFDSED 2p-Value
18:070.058.73.410.030
Oxygenated fatty acids
9-oxo-18:0 + 10-OH-18:00.1290.2210.05800.186
10-oxo-18:02.18614.6583.39540.021
13-oxo-18:00.0720.2700.02490.001
15-oxo-18:00.0160.0690.01460.023
18:1 isomers
cis-9 18:117.19012.7140.64190.020
cis-11 18:10.1840.2620.03130.130
cis-12 18:10.1120.1330.02070.401
cis-13 18:10.0240.0340.00480.105
cis-15 18:10.0400.0360.02000.845
cis-16 18:10.0400.0420.00820.867
trans-4 18:10.0930.1030.04910.849
trans-5 18:10.0480.0610.03180.708
trans-6 + 7 + 8 18:11.0211.6250.08050.002
trans-9 18:10.8061.2950.03800.006
trans-10 18:10.6080.9370.11550.047
trans-11 18:11.0591.5930.15480.026
trans-12 18:10.4910.8020.02100.005
trans-13 + 14 18:13.3563.6400.23200.346
trans-15 + cis-10 18:12.1382.5710.19100.086
trans-16 + cis-14 18:10.4170.1820.02070.008
1 Derived from ewes fed a diet without lipid supplementation (control inoculum) or supplemented with 2% dry matter of fish oil (FO-MFD inoculum); 2 Standard error of the difference.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toral, P.G.; Hervás, G.; Peiró, V.; Frutos, P. Conditions Associated with Marine Lipid-Induced Milk Fat Depression in Sheep Cause Shifts in the In Vitro Ruminal Metabolism of 1-13C Oleic Acid. Animals 2018, 8, 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110196

AMA Style

Toral PG, Hervás G, Peiró V, Frutos P. Conditions Associated with Marine Lipid-Induced Milk Fat Depression in Sheep Cause Shifts in the In Vitro Ruminal Metabolism of 1-13C Oleic Acid. Animals. 2018; 8(11):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toral, Pablo G., Gonzalo Hervás, Vanessa Peiró, and Pilar Frutos. 2018. "Conditions Associated with Marine Lipid-Induced Milk Fat Depression in Sheep Cause Shifts in the In Vitro Ruminal Metabolism of 1-13C Oleic Acid" Animals 8, no. 11: 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110196

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop