Next Article in Journal
Brazilian Citizens: Expectations Regarding Dairy Cattle Welfare and Awareness of Contentious Practices
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting Lameness in Sheep Activity Using Tri-Axial Acceleration Signals
Previous Article in Journal
The Mental Homologies of Mammals. Towards an Understanding of Another Mammals World View
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calves Use an Automated Brush and a Hanging Rope When Pair-Housed
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Animals 2017, 7(12), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120088

To Group or Not to Group? Good Practice for Housing Male Laboratory Mice

1
Bristol Veterinary School, Bristol University, Langford House, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
2
Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 October 2017 / Revised: 19 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 November 2017 / Published: 24 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Management in the 21st Century)
Full-Text   |   PDF [292 KB, uploaded 24 November 2017]

Abstract

It is widely recommended to group-house male laboratory mice because they are ‘social animals’, but male mice do not naturally share territories and aggression can be a serious welfare problem. Even without aggression, not all animals within a group will be in a state of positive welfare. Rather, many male mice may be negatively affected by the stress of repeated social defeat and subordination, raising concerns about welfare and also research validity. However, individual housing may not be an appropriate solution, given the welfare implications associated with no social contact. An essential question is whether it is in the best welfare interests of male mice to be group- or singly housed. This review explores the likely impacts—positive and negative—of both housing conditions, presents results of a survey of current practice and awareness of mouse behavior, and includes recommendations for good practice and future research. We conclude that whether group- or single-housing is better (or less worse) in any situation is highly context-dependent according to several factors including strain, age, social position, life experiences, and housing and husbandry protocols. It is important to recognise this and evaluate what is preferable from animal welfare and ethical perspectives in each case. View Full-Text
Keywords: refinement; mouse welfare; mouse husbandry; mouse aggression; male mice; social organisation; group housing; single housing; animal husbandry; animal welfare; animal management refinement; mouse welfare; mouse husbandry; mouse aggression; male mice; social organisation; group housing; single housing; animal husbandry; animal welfare; animal management
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kappel, S.; Hawkins, P.; Mendl, M.T. To Group or Not to Group? Good Practice for Housing Male Laboratory Mice. Animals 2017, 7, 88.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top