Postmortem Aqueous Humor Analysis in Pigs as an Index of Antemortem Serum Biochemistry Profile and Diagnostic Aid in Animal Welfare
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Sampling
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Analytical Procedures
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Study Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, S.; Yu, B.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Shi, L.; Chen, H. Assessment of Hematologic and Biochemical Parameters for Healthy Commercial Pigs in China. Animals 2022, 12, 2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, M.F.; Nunes, M.; Vieira-Pinto, M. Non-Invasive Human-Free Diagnosis Methods for Assessing Pig Welfare at Abattoirs: A Systematic Review. Animals 2025, 15, 2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, J.W. Postmortem Changes in Animal Carcasses and Estimation of the Postmortem Interval. Vet. Pathol. 2016, 53, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donaldson, A.E.; Lamont, I.L. Biochemistry Changes That Occur after Death: Potential Markers for Determining Post-Mortem Interval. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madea, B. Autolysis, putrefactive changes and post-mortem chemistry. In Estimation of the Time Since Death; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 187–281. [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson, L.; Van Den Heuvel, C.; Scott, T.; Byard, R.W. Difficulties Associated with the Interpretation of Postmortem Toxicology. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2024, 48, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pigaiani, N.; Bertaso, A.; De Palo, E.F.; Bortolotti, F.; Tagliaro, F. Vitreous humor endogenous compounds analysis for post-mortem forensic investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 310, 110235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palić, M.; Šoštarić Zuckermann, I.-C.; Džaja, P.; Ljubić, B.B.; Severin, K. A biochemical and histological assessment of postmortem changes to the eyes of domestic pigs: A preliminary study. Animals 2024, 14, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaehler, A.; Kuta, P.; Renné, T.; Garland, J.; Tse, R.; Iwersen-Bergmann, S.; Fitzek, A.; Ondruschka, B. Variance in intraindividual stability of vitreous humor for thanatochemistry. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2025, 139, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baniak, N.; Campos-Baniak, G.; Mulla, A.; Kalra, J. Vitreous humor: A short review on post-mortem applications. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 5, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmiere, C.; Mangin, P. Postmortem chemistry update part I. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2012, 126, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalra, J.; Mulla, A.; Kopargaonkar, A. Diagnostic value of vitreous humor in postmortem analysis. SM J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 1, 1005. [Google Scholar]
- Belsey, S.; Flanagan, R. Postmortem biochemistry: Current applications. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2016, 41, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zilg, B.; Alkass, K.; Kronstrand, R.; Berg, S.; Druid, H. A rapid method for postmortem vitreous chemistry-deadside analysis. Biomolecules 2021, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srettabunjong, S.; Thongphap, W.; Chittamma, A. Urea, uric acid, and creatinine in postmortem blood, vitreous humor, and synovial fluid: A comparative and correlation study. J. Forensic Sci. 2020, 65, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, A.W.; Roig, D.; Valerio, C.; Denagamage, T. Postmortem analysis of vitreous urea nitrogen, creatinine, and magnesium of renal and post-renal disease in cats. Toxics 2023, 11, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorotrian, T.; Stern, A.W.; Gao, H.; Costidis, A.; Fontaine, C.; Deming, A.; Harms, C.; Adams, H.R. Precision of the Abaxis VetScan VS2 for postmortem biochemical analysis of delphinid vitreous humor. Mar. Mammal Sci. 2023, 39, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, G.; Foster, A. Use of ocular fluids to aid postmortem diagnosis in cattle and sheep. Practice 2009, 31, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilg, B. Postmortem Analyses of Vitreous Fluid. Ph.D. Thesis, Karolinska Institutet (Sweden), Stockholm, Sweden, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Severin, K.; Džaja, P.; Šperanda, M.; Ðidara, M.; Konjević, D.; Šatrović, E.; Starčević, K. Estimation of red deer (Cervus elaphus) post mortal interval based on the biochemical parameters of vitreous fluid using linear regression analyses. Vet. Arh. 2018, 88, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coe, J.I. Postmortem chemistry update emphasis on forensic application. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1993, 14, 91–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandrakanth, H.; Kanchan, T.; Balaraj, B.; Virupaksha, H.; Chandrashekar, T. Postmortem vitreous chemistry—An evaluation of sodium, potassium and chloride levels in estimation of time since death (during the first 36 h after death). J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2013, 20, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCleskey, B.C.; Dye, D.W.; Davis, G.G. Review of postmortem interval estimation using vitreous humor: Past, present, and future. Acad. Forensic Pathol. 2016, 6, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaughlin, B.G.; McLaughlin, P.S. Equine vitreous humor chemical concentrations: Correlation with serum concentrations, and postmortem changes with time and temperature. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 52, 476. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yahia, D.; Abd El-Hakiem, M.A. Biochemical analysis of synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous humor at early postmortem intervals in donkeys. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2014, 4, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
- Hanna, P.E.; Bellamy, J.; Donald, A. Postmortem eyefluid analysis in dogs, cats and cattle as an estimate of antemortem serum chemistry profiles. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1990, 54, 487. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- McCoy, M.A.; Hudson, A.J.; Hutchinson, T.; Davison, G.; Kennedy, D.G. Postsampling stability of eye fluid magnesium concentrations in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 312–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCoy, M. Hypomagnesaemia and new data on vitreous humour magnesium concentration as a post-mortem marker in ruminants. Magnes. Res. 2004, 17, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- McLaughlin, P.S.; McLaughlin, B.G. Chemical analysis of bovine and porcine vitreous humors: Correlation of normal values with serum chemical values and changes with time and temperature. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1987, 48, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
- Athanasiou, L.; Christodoulopoulos, G.; Polizopoulou, Z.; Kalaitzakis, E.; Papadakis, S.; Karatzia, M.; Katsogiannou, E.; Katsoulos, P. Post mortem aqueous humor analysis in sheep as index of ante mortem serum biochemistry profile. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 159, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavhan, S.; Balachandran, C.; Nambi, A.; Raj, G.D.; Vairamuthu, S. A study on vitreous humor between-eye differences and baseline values of potassium, calcium, sodium and glucose immediately after death in dogs. Indian J. Vet. Anim. Sci. Res. 2014, 43, 372–375. [Google Scholar]
- Palmer, D.; Ossent, P.; Suter, M.; Lutz, H. Post mortem urea levels in aqueous humour as a reliable indicator of ante mortem uraemia. Vet. Rec. 1985, 116, 411–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Li, H.; Yang, T.; Ding, Z.; Wu, S.; Qiu, X.; Liu, Q. A study on the estimation of postmortem interval based on environmental temperature and concentrations of substance in vitreous humor. J. Forensic Sci. 2018, 63, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olbrych, K.; Marczuk, J.; Sokołowska, J.; Barszcz, K.; Bartyzel, B.J. Postmortem analysis of the chemical compounds of aqueous humour obtained from the eye of European bison–preliminary results. Eur. Bison Conserv. Newsl. 2015, 8, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Zelentsova, E.A.; Yanshole, L.V.; Melnikov, A.D.; Kudryavtsev, I.S.; Novoselov, V.P.; Tsentalovich, Y.P. Post-mortem changes in metabolomic profiles of human serum, aqueous humor and vitreous humor. Metabolomics 2020, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drolet, R.; D’Allaire, S.; Chagnon, M. The evaluation of postmortem ocular fluid analysis as a diagnostic aid in sows. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1990, 2, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, J.F.; Aysu, J.E.; Tóth, I.; Szilasi, A.; Mándoki, M. Veterinary Forensic Pathology in the Investigation of Animal Cruelty: Post-Mortem Insights, Forensic Tools, Case Studies, and Legal Perspectives. Animals 2026, 16, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Godyń, D.; Herbut, P.; Angrecka, S.; Corrêa Vieira, F.M. Use of different cooling methods in pig facilities to alleviate the effects of heat stress—A review. Animals 2020, 10, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vermeer, H.M.; Aarnink, A.J. Review on Heat Stress in Pigs on Farm; EURCAW-Pigs: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Reyes-Illg, G.; Martin, J.E.; Mani, I.; Reynolds, J.; Kipperman, B. The Rise of Heatstroke as a Method of Depopulating Pigs and Poultry: Implications for the US Veterinary Profession. Animals 2022, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saxmose Nielsen, S.; Alvarez, J.; Bicout, D.J.; Calistri, P.; Depner, K.; Drewe, J.A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J.L.; Gortázar Schmidt, C.; Michel, V.; et al. Welfare of pigs during killing for purposes other than slaughter. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 1381–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EU. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, L 303, 1–30. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1099/oj/eng (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Zilg, B.; Alkass, K.; Berg, S.; Druid, H. Interpretation of postmortem vitreous concentrations of sodium and chloride. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 263, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkie, I.; Bellamy, J. Estimation of antemortem serum electrolytes and urea concentrations from vitreous humor collected postmortem. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1982, 46, 146. [Google Scholar]
- McNeil, A.R.; Gardner, A.; Stables, S. Simple method for improving the precision of electrolyte measurements in vitreous humor. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 135–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Globulins. Available online: https://eclinpath.com/chemistry/proteins/globulins (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- González-Montaña, J.R.; Escalera-Valente, F.; Lomillos, J.; Alonso, A.; Gaudioso, V.; Alonso, M. Relationships between eye fluids and blood values after exercise in lidia cattle: Mineral parameters. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 22, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brzezinski, P.M.; Godlewski, A. Assessment of potassium and sodium ion concentrations in the vitreous humour of swine isolated eyeballs after organism death. Rocz. Akad. Med. Bialymst. 2004, 49, 161–163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Thierauf, A.; Musshoff, F.; Madea, B. Post-mortem biochemical investigations of vitreous humor. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 192, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byard, R.W.; Summersides, G. Vitreous humor sodium levels in immersion deaths. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, 643–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madea, B.; Lachenmeier, D.W. Postmortem diagnosis of hypertonic dehydration. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005, 155, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osweiler, G.D.; Carr, T.F.; Sanderson, T.P.; Carson, T.L.; Kinker, J.A. Water deprivation-sodium ion toxicosis in cattle. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1995, 7, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilg, B.; Alkass, K.; Berg, S.; Druid, H. Postmortem identification of hyperglycemia. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 185, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Biochemical Parameter | Serum 1 | Aqueous Humor 1 | R2 | Linear Regression Equation | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | Min–Max | Mean ± SE | Min–Max | ||||
| ALB (g/L) | 31.4 ± 1.26 | 18–48 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.4–0.8 | 0.191 | 0.307 | |
| ALP (U/L) | 203.4 ± 10.33 | 117–295 | 16.87 ± 0.81 | 8–25 | 0.099 | 0.601 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 45.83 ± 1.47 | 28–59 | 5.17 ± 0.52 | 0–12 | −0.012 | 0.949 | |
| TBIL (mmol/L) | 7.33 ± 0.91 | 1–24 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.2–0.3 | 0.212 | 0.259 | |
| UN (mmol/L) | 6.15 ± 0.1 | 5.2–7 | 5.52 ± 0.1 | 4.5–6.6 | 0.971 | y = 0.844 + 0.962x | 0.001 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | 2.49 ± 0.13 | 1–4 | 1.8 ± 0.07 | 1.1–2.5 | 0.056 | 0.768 | |
| PHOS (mmol/L) | 2.43 ± 0.05 | 1.94–2.88 | 2.99 ± 0.07 | 2.21–3.66 | 0.702 | y = 0.924 + 0.505x | 0.001 |
| CRE (µmol/L) | 94.7 ± 3.01 | 70–120 | 45.3 ± 1.75 | 30–64 | 0.981 | y = 18.367 + 1.685x | 0.001 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 5.33 ± 0.05 | 4.88–5.74 | 2.87 ± 0.08 | 2.2–3.7 | 0.535 | y = 4.484 + 0.293x | 0.002 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 146.7 ± 0.57 | 137–155 | 139.2 ± 0.49 | 134–145 | 0.642 | y = 42.409 + 0.749x | 0.001 |
| K (mmol/L) | 5.44 ± 0.15 | 4–6.7 | 5.86 ± 0.18 | 4.1–7.4 | 0.973 | y = 0.597 + 0.826x | 0.001 |
| TP (U/L) | 62.9 ± 1.77 | 52–89 | 1.37 ± 0.04 | 1–1.8 | 0.017 | 0.929 | |
| GLOB (U/L) | 52.7 ± 1.91 | 28–72 | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.5–1 | 0.027 | 0.882 | |
| AMY (U/L) | 1428.53 ± 41.66 | 1005–1825 | 37.23 ± 6.32 | 7–128 | 0.036 | 0.849 | |
| Biochemical Parameter | Mean ± SE 1 | Min–Max | Extrapolated Value from Linear Regression Equation * |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB (g/L) | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.5–1 | |
| ALP (U/L) | 35.73 ± 1.51 | 28–48 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 4.93 ± 0.86 | 0–12 | |
| TBIL (mmol/L) | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.2–0.3 | |
| UN (mmol/L) | 5.55 ± 0.17 | 4.5–7.1 | 6.183 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | 1.79 ± 0.09 | 1.2–2.2 | |
| PHOS (mmol/L) | 5.38 ± 0.15 | 4.25–6.68 | 3.641 |
| CRE (µmol/L) | 149.67 ± 2.5 | 135–168 | 270.561 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 1.30 ± 0.00 | 1.3–1.3 | 4.685 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 137.47 ± 2.28 | 121–155 | 145.374 |
| K (mmol/L) | 12.33 ± 0.34 | 10.2–14.5 | 10.782 |
| TP (U/L) | 1.77 ± 0.09 | 1.3–2.4 | |
| GLOB (U/L) | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.5–0.9 | |
| AMY (U/L) | 58.47 ± 5.29 | 30–90 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Mihaljević, Ž.; Šandor, K.; Naletilić, Š.; Vidić, Z.; Kilvain, I.; Lolić, M. Postmortem Aqueous Humor Analysis in Pigs as an Index of Antemortem Serum Biochemistry Profile and Diagnostic Aid in Animal Welfare. Animals 2026, 16, 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091358
Mihaljević Ž, Šandor K, Naletilić Š, Vidić Z, Kilvain I, Lolić M. Postmortem Aqueous Humor Analysis in Pigs as an Index of Antemortem Serum Biochemistry Profile and Diagnostic Aid in Animal Welfare. Animals. 2026; 16(9):1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091358
Chicago/Turabian StyleMihaljević, Željko, Ksenija Šandor, Šimun Naletilić, Zdravka Vidić, Iva Kilvain, and Marica Lolić. 2026. "Postmortem Aqueous Humor Analysis in Pigs as an Index of Antemortem Serum Biochemistry Profile and Diagnostic Aid in Animal Welfare" Animals 16, no. 9: 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091358
APA StyleMihaljević, Ž., Šandor, K., Naletilić, Š., Vidić, Z., Kilvain, I., & Lolić, M. (2026). Postmortem Aqueous Humor Analysis in Pigs as an Index of Antemortem Serum Biochemistry Profile and Diagnostic Aid in Animal Welfare. Animals, 16(9), 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16091358

