Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Ompok bimaculatus) in a River Basin
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Fish Samples
2.2. Proximate Composition Analysis and Total Energy Determination
2.3. pH Measurement
2.4. Color Measurement
2.5. Mineral Composition Analysis
2.6. Amino Acid Analysis
2.7. Fatty Acid Analysis
2.8. Microbiological Quality Analysis
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Proximate Composition, Total Energy, and pH
3.2. Color
3.3. Mineral Composition
3.4. Amino Acid Composition
3.5. Fatty Acid Composition
3.6. Relationship Between Body Size and Key Nutritional Components
3.7. Microbiological Quality
4. Discussion
4.1. Proximate Composition, Total Energy, and pH
4.2. Color
4.3. Mineral Composition
4.4. Amino Acid Composition
4.5. Fatty Acid Composition
4.6. Relationship Between Body Size and Key Nutritional Components
4.7. Microbiological Quality
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alam, S.M.D.; Karim, M.H.; Chakrabortty, A.; Amin, R.; Hasan, S. Investigation of nutritional status of the butter catfish Ompok bimaculatus: An important freshwater fish species in the diet of common Bangladeshi people. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 5, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabnarong, P.; Kaewrat, J. A man-made change in Pak Phanang River Basin. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2006, 3, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
- Yusoff, F.M.; Umi, W.A.D.; Ramli, N.; Harun, R. Water quality management in aquaculture. Camb. Prism. Water 2024, 2, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opiyo, M.A. A review of aquaculture production and health management practices of farmed fish. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018, 6, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mugwanya, M.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Kimera, F.; Sewilam, H. A review on recirculating aquaculture system: Influence of stocking density on fish and crustacean behavior, growth performance, and immunity. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2022, 22, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, I.; Jan, K.; Fatma, S.; Dawood, M.A.O. Muscle proximate composition of various food fish species and their nutritional significance: A review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 106, 760–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kandyliari, A.; Mallouchos, A.; Papandroulakis, N.; Golla, J.P.; Lam, T.T.; Sakellari, A.; Karavoltsos, S.; Vasiliou, V.; Kapsokefalou, M. Nutrient composition and fatty acid and protein profiles of selected fish by-products. Foods 2020, 9, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Byrd, S.; Smith, J.; Nguyen, T. Fish nutrient composition: A review of global data from poorly assessed inland and marine species. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 24, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menapace, L.; Moschini, G. Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2012, 39, 539–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Zarza, M.; Amaya-Corchuelo, S.; Belletti, G.; Aguilar-Criado, E. Trust and food quality in the valorisation of geographical indication initiatives. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 21st ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Chaijan, M.; Chaijan, S.; Panya, A.; Nisoa, M.; Cheong, L.Z.; Panpipat, W. High hydrogen peroxide concentration-low exposure time of plasma-activated water (PAW): A novel approach for shelf-life extension of Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer) steak. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 74, 102861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BS EN 14103:2011; Fat and Oil Derivatives—Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME)—Determination of Ester and Linolenic Acid Methyl Ester Contents. British Standards Institution (BSI): London, UK, 2011.
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 3: Aerobic Plate Count (May 2025 ed.). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-3-aerobic-plate-count (accessed on 14 January 2025).
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5: Salmonella (May 2024 ed.). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-5-salmonella (accessed on 14 January 2025).
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA). Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 12: Staphylococcus aureus; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-12-staphylococcus-aureus (accessed on 14 January 2025).
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 4: Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria. 2020. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/182572/download (accessed on 14 January 2025).
- Codex Alimentarius Commission. Code of Practice for Fish and Fishery Products (CAC/RCP 52-2003, Revised 2020); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- Tokur, B. The effect of different cooking methods on proximate composition and lipid quality of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shearer, K.D.; Åsgård, T.; Andorsdöttir, G.; Aas, G.H. Whole body elemental and proximate composition of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during the life cycle. J. Fish Biol. 1994, 44, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tocher, D.R. Fatty acid requirements in ontogeny of marine and freshwater fish. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chadli, H.; Ennayer, I.; Bahida, A.; Nhhala, H.; Er-Raioui, H. Impact of dead fish degradation on the monitoring of fish losses in the pregrowing and growing phase of caged European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquac. Res. 2024, 2024, 8369485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.I.D.; Silva, V.F.D.; Goes, M.D.; Cardoso, S.U.; Baumgartner, L.A.; Souza, M.L.R.D.; Honorato, C.A.; Bombardelli, R.A.; Goes, E.S.D.R. Pre-slaughter rest is effective in improving the physiology and quality of Nile tilapia fillets subjected to in vivo transportation at high densities. Foods 2025, 14, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumaravel, B.; Amutha, A.L.; Mary, T.M.; Agrawal, A.; Singh, A.; Saran, S.; Govindarajan, N. Automated seafood freshness detection and preservation analysis using machine learning and paper-based pH sensors. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 26051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gümüş, E.; Yılayaz, A.; Kanyılmaz, M.; Gümüş, B.; Balaban, M. Evaluation of body weight and color of cultured European catfish (Silurus glanis) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) using image analysis. Aquac. Eng. 2021, 93, 102147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şengör, G.F.Ü.; Balaban, M.D.; Topaldı, B.; Ayvaz, Z.; Ceylan, Z.; Doğruyol, H. Color assessment by different techniques of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) during cold storage. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phetsang, H.; Panpipat, W.; Panya, A.; Phonsatta, N.; Cheong, L.Z.; Chaijan, M. Chemical characteristics and volatile compounds profiles in different muscle part of the farmed hybrid catfish (Clarias macrocephalus × Clarias gariepinus). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanek, M.; Stasiak, K.; Janicki, B.; Bernacka, H. Content of selected elements in the muscle tissue and gills of perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and water from a Polish lake. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 1033–1038. Available online: https://www.pjoes.com/pdf-88836-22695?filename=Content+of+Selected.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- Lall, S.P.; Kaushik, S.J. Nutrition and metabolism of minerals in fish. Animals 2021, 11, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.R.; Rahman, M.A.; Haque, M.N.; Sharker, M.R.; Islam, M.M.; Alam, M.A. Nutritional profiling of some selected commercially important freshwater and marine water fishes of Bangladesh. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugiura, S.; Satoh, S. Minerals. In Nutrition and Physiology of Fish and Shellfish: Feed Regulation, Metabolism and Digestion; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 493–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Qudah, K.M.; Gharaibeh, A.A.; Al-Shyyab, M.A.M. Trace minerals status and antioxidant enzymes activities in calves with dermatophytosis. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2010, 136, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rebolé, A.; Velasco, S.; Rodríguez, M.L.; Treviño, J.; Alzueta, C.; Tejedor, J.L.; Ortiz, L.T. Nutrient content in the muscle and skin of fillets from farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Food Chem. 2015, 174, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pirhonen, J.; Forsman, L. Effect of prolonged feed restriction on size variation, feed consumption, body composition, growth and smolting of brown trout, Salmo trutta. Aquaculture 1998, 162, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, B.; Mahanty, A.; Ganguly, S.; Sankar, T.V.; Chakraborty, K.; Rangasamy, A.; Paul, B.; Sarma, D.; Mathew, S.; Asha, K.K.; et al. Amino acid compositions of 27 food fishes and their importance in clinical nutrition. J. Amino Acids 2014, 2014, 269797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xipsiti, M. Protein quality evaluation: FAO perspective. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1446879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Q.; Cai, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.; Yang, M.; Xing, H. Nutrition composition of different size of male largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and its implications for food processing industry. Isr. J. Aquac. Bamidgeh 2025, 77, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; United Nations University. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation; WHO Technical Report Series No. 935; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, L.; Yu, H.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Ma, C.; Kong, W. Dietary L-lysine requirement of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) alevins. Animals 2023, 13, 3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, S.U.; Ali, R.; Zhang, H.; Zafar, M.H.; Wang, M. Research progress in the role and mechanism of Leucine in regulating animal growth and development. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1252089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Machado, M.; Machado, S.; Pimentel, F.B.; Freitas, V.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P. Amino acid profile and protein quality assessment of macroalgae produced in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system. Foods 2020, 9, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S.H.; Liu, T.T.; Wan, P.; Zhu, Q.; Xia, N.; Wang, Q.Z.; Chen, D.W. Enrichment of the umami-taste-active amino acids and peptides from crab sauce using ethanol precipitation and anion-exchange resin. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaijan, M.; Chumthong, K.; Kongchoosi, N.; Chinarak, K.; Panya, A.; Phonsatta, N.; Cheong, L.Z.; Panpipat, W. Characterisation of pH-shift-produced protein isolates from sago palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) larvae. J. Insects Food Feed 2022, 8, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Ning, X.; He, X.; Sun, X.; Yu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Yu, R.-Q.; Wu, Y. Fatty acid composition analyses of commercially important fish species from the Pearl River Estuary, China. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Łuczyńska, J.; Paszczyk, B.; Borejszo, Z.; Tarkowski, Ł. Fatty acid profile of muscles of freshwater fish from Olsztyn markets. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012, 62, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert, A.; Mfilinge, P.; Limbu, S.M.; Mwita, C.J. Fatty acid composition and levels of selected polyunsaturated fatty acids in four commercial important freshwater fish species from Lake Victoria, Tanzania. J. Lipids 2014, 2014, 712134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Všetičková, L.; Suchý, P.; Straková, E. Factors influencing the lipid content and fatty acids composition of freshwater fish: A review. Asian J. Fish. Aquat. Res. 2019, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parzanini, C.; Colombo, S.M.; Kainz, M.J.; Wacker, A.; Parrish, C.C.; Arts, M.T. Discrimination between freshwater and marine fish using fatty acids: Ecological implications and future perspectives. Environ. Rev. 2020, 28, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, I.; Glencross, B.; Santigosa, E. The importance of essential fatty acids and their ratios in aquafeeds to enhance salmonid production, welfare, and human health. Front. Anim. Sci. 2023, 4, 1147081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devadason, C.; Jayasinghe, C.; Sivakanesan, R.; Senarath, S.; Beppu, F.; Gotoh, N. Comparative analysis of lipid content and fatty acid composition of commercially important fish and shellfish from Sri Lanka and Japan. J. Oleo Sci. 2016, 65, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aberoumand, A. Evaluation of fatty acid-related nutritional quality indices in fish. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 1604–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Nutritional indices for assessing fatty acids: A mini-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanova, A.; Hadzhinikolova, L. Evaluation of nutritional quality of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) lipids through fatty acid ratios and lipid indices. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 21, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
- Memon, N.N.; Talpur, F.N.; Bhanger, M.I. Nutritional aspects and seasonal influence on fatty acid composition of carp (Labeo rohita) from the Indus River, Pakistan. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2010, 60, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
- Food and Drug Administration of Thailand. Microbiological Standards for Food; Ministry of Public Health: Nonthaburi, Thailand, 2021; Available online: https://food.fda.moph.go.th/ (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF). Microorganisms in Foods 6: Microbial Ecology of Food Commodities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Available online: https://www.icmsf.org/publications/ (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- Sheng, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, G. The microbial safety of fish and fish products: Recent developments and future perspectives. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 738–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Parameters | Large (3–5 Fish/kg) | Medium (6–10 Fish/kg) | Small (12–15 Fish/kg) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximate composition | ||||
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 68.33 ± 0.04 b | 71.07 ± 1.58 a | 72.66 ± 0.40 a | 0.004 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 16.60 ± 0.08 | 16.58 ± 0.29 | 15.28 ± 1.10 | 0.101 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 13.35 ± 0.20 a | 10.02 ± 0.64 b | 8.78 ± 0.03 c | 0.001 |
| Ash (g/100g) | 1.52 ± 0.05 a | 1.59 ± 0.12 a | 1.38 ± 0.02 b | 0.034 |
| Carbohydrate (g/100 g) | 1.24 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.47 | 0.221 |
| Total Energy (cal/g) | 2203 ± 20 a | 1856 ± 84 b | 1695 ± 5 c | 0.000 |
| pH | 6.66 ± 0.25 b | 6.65 ± 0.11 b | 7.02 ± 0.18 a | 0.028 |
| Color | ||||
| L* | 57.42 ± 4.98 ab | 60.17 ± 4.42 a | 48.91 ± 2.10 b | 0.036 |
| a* | −2.41 ± 0.57 | −2.98 ± 0.48 | −2.49 ± 0.68 | 0.475 |
| b* | 6.88 ± 3.23 | 8.72 ± 3.83 | 9.23 ± 1.20 | 0.693 |
| Mineral (mg/100 g) | Large (3–5 Fish/kg) | Medium (6–10 Fish/kg) | Small (12–15 Fish/kg) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium (Ca) | 1455 ± 78 a | 1311 ± 67 a | 1043 ± 22 b | 0.002 |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 1310 ± 50 a | 1118 ± 34 b | 1114 ± 4 b | 0.043 |
| Iron (Fe) | 18 ± 3 a | 12 ± 3 b | 7 ± 1 c | 0.007 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 27 ± 3 | 24 ± 1 | 28 ± 2 | 0.181 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 6 ± 1 | 5 ± 1 | 5 ± 0 | 0.168 |
| Sodium (Na) | 1446 ± 98 | 1657 ± 87 | 1497 ± 75 | 0.150 |
| Potassium (K) | 11,420 ± 731 | 10,986 ± 501 | 10,971 ± 277 | 0.584 |
| Amino Acid (mg/g) | Type | Large (3–5 Fish/kg) | Medium (6–10 Fish/kg) | Small (12–15 Fish/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine | Non-essential | 32.37 ± 0.01 a | 28.40 ± 0.27 b | 32.39 ± 0.06 a |
| Arginine | Conditionally essential | 31.15 ± 0.04 a | 28.09 ± 0.03 b | 30.17 ± 0.18 a |
| Aspartic acid | Non-essential | 56.81 ± 0.10 a | 48.74 ± 0.01 c | 53.34 ± 0.11 b |
| Cysteine | Non-essential | 1.58 ± 0.02 a | 1.05 ± 0.04 b | 1.10 ± 0.02 b |
| Cystine | Non-essential | ND | ND | ND |
| Glutamic acid | Non-essential | 86.59 ± 0.33 a | 69.85 ± 0.37 c | 75.68 ± 0.18 b |
| Glycine | Non-essential | 29.37 ± 0.05 b | 29.20 ± 0.06 b | 33.64 ± 0.25 a |
| Histidine | Essential | 10.63 ± 0.01 c | 12.45 ± 0.12 b | 13.54 ± 0.12 a |
| Isoleucine | Essential | 21.62 ± 0.21 a | 19.99 ± 0.04 b | 21.38 ± 0.04 a |
| Leucine | Essential | 50.14 ± 0.15 a | 41.46 ± 0.16 c | 45.19 ± 0.12 b |
| Lysine | Essential | 50.15 ± 0.07 a | 42.95 ± 0.04 c | 46.06 ± 0.09 b |
| Methionine | Essential | 14.07 ± 0.15 a | 8.24 ± 0.01 c | 9.13 ± 0.10 b |
| Phenylalanine | Essential | 20.96 ± 0.05 b | 20.67 ± 0.22 b | 22.20 ± 0.02 a |
| Proline | Non-essential | 15.10 ± 0.34 c | 16.14 ± 0.03 b | 17.87 ± 0.45 a |
| Serine | Non-essential | 19.90 ± 0.15 b | 18.67 ± 0.09 c | 20.27 ± 0.07 a |
| Threonine | Essential | 21.75 ± 0.18 b | 20.10 ± 0.02 c | 22.05 ± 0.01 a |
| Tryptophan | Essential | ND | ND | ND |
| Tyrosine | Conditionally essential | 12.58 ± 0.49 b | 12.74 ± 0.07 b | 13.13 ± 0.15 a |
| Valine | Essential | 27.71 ± 0.17 a | 23.58 ± 0.16 c | 25.45 ± 0.26 b |
| Fatty Acid (g/100 g) | Symbol (C:D) | Type | Large (3–5 Fish/kg) | Medium (6–10 Fish/kg) | Small (12–15 Fish/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caprylic acid | C8:0 | MCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Nomanoic acid | C9:0 | MCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Capric acid | C10:0 | MCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Undecanoic acid | C11:0 | MCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Lauric acid | C12:0 | MCFA | 0.28 ± 0.00 b | 0.32 ± 0.00 a | 0.22 ± 0.00 c |
| Tridecanoic acid | C13:0 | MCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Myristic acid | C14:0 | LCFA | 1.30 ± 0.00 b | 1.27 ± 0.00 c | 1.71 ± 0.00 a |
| Tetradecenoic acid | C14:1; cis-9 | LCFA | ND | 0.03 ± 0.00 | ND |
| Pentadecanoic acid | C15:0 | OCFA | 0.28 ± 0.00 b | 0.26 ± 0.00 c | 0.39 ± 0.00 a |
| Pentadecenoic acid | C15:1; cis-10 | MUFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Palmitic acid | C16:0 | LCFA | 21.84 ± 0.02 b | 21.13 ± 0.02 c | 25.96 ± 0.02 a |
| Palmitoleic acid | C16:1 | MUFA | 2.48 ± 0.00 c | 2.84 ± 0.00 b | 3.18 ± 0.00 a |
| Heptadecenoic acid | C17:1 | MUFA | 0.17 ± 0.00 b | 0.18 ± 0.00 a | 0.02 ± 0.00 c |
| Stearic acid | C18:0 | LCFA | 6.63 ± 0.02 b | 5.07 ± 0.02 c | 7.04 ± 0.00 a |
| Oleic acid | C18:1 | MUFA | 27.00 ± 0.02 b | 27.63 ± 0.05 a | 26.10 ± 0.05 c |
| Linoleic acid | C18:2 | PUFA | 14.79 ± 0.01 b | 15.45 ± 0.01 a | 5.93 ± 0.00 c |
| Methyl linolelaidate | C18:2; trans-9,12 | PUFA | ND | ND | ND |
| γ-linolenic acid, ALA | C18:3; all-cis-6,9,12 | PUFA | 0.24 ± 0.00 a | 0.18 ± 0.00 b | 0.07 ± 0.00 c |
| α-linolenic acid, ALA | C18:3; all-cis-9,12,15 | PUFA | 1.09 ± 0.00 b | 1.15 ± 0.00 a | 0.20 ± 0.00 c |
| Arachidic acid | C20:0 | LCFA | 0.22 ± 0.00 c | 0.24 ± 0.00 b | 0.30 ± 0.00 a |
| Ecoseonic acid | C20:1; cis-11 | MUFA | 0.94 ± 0.00 c | 1.05 ± 0.00 b | 1.39 ± 0.00 a |
| Ecosadienoic acid | C20:2; all-cis-11,14 | PUFA | 0.93 ± 0.01 a | 0.67 ± 0.01 b | 0.33 ± 0.00 c |
| Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid | C20:3; all-cis-8,11,14 | PUFA | 1.07 ± 0.00 a | 0.46 ± 0.00 b | 0.16 ± 0.00 c |
| Ecosatrienoic acid | C20:3; all-cis-11,14,17 | PUFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA | C20:5; all-cis-5,8,11,14,17 | PUFA | 0.43 ± 0.00 a | 0.42 ± 0.00 b | ND |
| Behenic acid | C22:0 | LCFA | ND | 0.15 ± 0.01 | ND |
| Erucic acid | C22:1 | MUFA | ND | 0.12 ± 0.00 b | 0.24 ± 0.00 a |
| Docosahexaenoic acid, DHA | C22:6 | PUFA | 2.20 ± 0.01 a | 2.00 ± 0.01 b | 0.28 ± 0.00 c |
| Lignoceric acid | C24:0 | VLCFA | ND | ND | ND |
| Selacholeic acid | C24:1 | MUFA | ND | 0.11 ± 0.00 b | 0.23 ± 0.00 a |
| Fatty acid group | |||||
| MCFA | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.22 | ||
| LCFA | 29.99 | 27.89 | 35.01 | ||
| OCFA | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.39 | ||
| MUFA | 30.59 | 31.81 | 30.92 | ||
| PUFA | 20.75 | 20.33 | 6.97 | ||
| VLCFA | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| UFA/SFA ratio | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.1 | ||
| Microorganisms | Large (3–5 Fish/kg) | Medium (6–10 Fish/kg) | Small (12–15 Fish/kg) | Standard/Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Viable Count (CFU/g) | 1.5 × 104 | 1.0 × 103 | 1.3 × 103 | Acceptable level (<105 CFU/g) [18] |
| Total Coliform (MPN/100 g) | 11 | 7.2 | <3 | Indicative of good hygienic quality |
| Escherichia coli (MPN/100 g) | ND | ND | ND | Must be absent |
| Staphylococus aureus (CFU/g) | ND | ND | ND | Must be absent |
| Salmonella spp. (CFU/25 g) | ND | ND | ND | Must be absent |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Sangpud, C.; Kaewchamnong, T.; Kaewkong, S.; Borirak-arawin, M.; Srinounpan, C.; Chaijan, M.; Wibowo, A.; Panpipat, W. Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Ompok bimaculatus) in a River Basin. Animals 2026, 16, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040663
Sangpud C, Kaewchamnong T, Kaewkong S, Borirak-arawin M, Srinounpan C, Chaijan M, Wibowo A, Panpipat W. Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Ompok bimaculatus) in a River Basin. Animals. 2026; 16(4):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040663
Chicago/Turabian StyleSangpud, Chatchai, Thirarat Kaewchamnong, Sujaree Kaewkong, Manorot Borirak-arawin, Chawanrat Srinounpan, Manat Chaijan, Ari Wibowo, and Worawan Panpipat. 2026. "Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Ompok bimaculatus) in a River Basin" Animals 16, no. 4: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040663
APA StyleSangpud, C., Kaewchamnong, T., Kaewkong, S., Borirak-arawin, M., Srinounpan, C., Chaijan, M., Wibowo, A., & Panpipat, W. (2026). Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Ompok bimaculatus) in a River Basin. Animals, 16(4), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040663

