The Effects of Dual-Yeast Compound Preparation on the Intestinal Health and Metabolism of Lambs
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Yeast Culture Preparation
2.2. Experimental Design and Diets
2.3. Sample Collection
2.4. Extraction and Detection of Metagenomic Samples
2.5. Construction and Sequencing of Metagenomic Libraries
2.6. Metagenomic Bioinformatics Analysis
- (1)
- Removed connector sequences (based on Trimmatic, parameter:ILLUMINACLIP:adapters_path: 2:30:10) and low-quality sequences (default quality threshold ≤ 20) from the original data (based on Trimmatic, parameter:SLIDINGWINDOW: 4:20) and removed sequences with a final length less than 50 bp (based on Trimmatic, parameter: MINLEN: 50).
- (2)
- Given the likelihood of contamination by the host, it is necessary to compare the clean data with the host genome, and the Bowtie2 software (v2.5.4, http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml, accessed on 15 May 2025; Parameters:—Very sensitive) was used by default to filter sequences from the host and obtain valid sequences for subsequent analysis.
- (3)
2.7. Extraction and Detection of Metabolomic Samples
2.8. Metabolomic Profiling Analysis
2.9. Statistical Analyses
2.10. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Effects of Yeast Culture on Lamb Intestinal Microbiota Composition and Diversity
3.3. Effect of Yeast Culture on the Function and Metabolism of Intestinal Microbiota in Lambs
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ADFI | Average daily feed intake |
| ADG | Average daily gain |
| FC | Fold-change |
| FDR | False-discovery rate |
| K. marxianus | Kluyveromyces marxianus |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| LEfSe | Linear discriminant analysis effect size |
| ME | Metabolizable energy |
| mTOR | Mammalian target of rapamycin |
| NMDS | Non-metric multidimensional scaling |
| PCA | Principal component analysis |
| PCoA | Principal coordinate analysis |
| S. cerevisiae | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| VIP | Variable importance |
References
- Cheng, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Q.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; et al. Distribution and difference of gastrointestinal flora in sheep with different body mass index. Animals 2022, 12, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, N.; Ma, X. Dietary amino acids and the gut-micro-biome-immune axis: Physiological metabolism and therapeutic prospects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clavijo, V.; Flórez, M.J.V. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 1006–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raabis, S.; Li, W.; Cersosimo, L. Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants. Vet. Immunol. Immunop. 2019, 208, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Cai, W. Effects of novel microecologics combined with traditional Chinese medicine and probiotics on growth performance and health of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Kou, S.; Chen, C.; Raza, S.H.A.; Wang, S.; Ma, X.; Zhang, W.J.; Nie, C. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on growth performance, metabonomics and intestinal microbial differences of weaned piglets. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, J.; Sun, M.; Chang, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Liang, X.; Xiao, T. Butyrate ameliorates colorectal cancer through regulating intestinal microecological disorders. Anticancer Drugs 2023, 34, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Du, R.; Li, X.; Ma, J.; Liu, D. Review of yeast culture concerning the interactions between gut microbiota and young ruminant animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1335765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Ameilbonne, A.; Auffret, P.; Bernard, M.; Mialon, M.M.; Dunière, L.; Forano, E. Supplementation of live yeast based feed additive in early life promotes rumen microbial colonization and fibrolytic potential in lambs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tavassoly, I.; Goldfarb, J.; Iyengar, R. Systems biology primer: The basic methods and approaches. Essays Biochem. 2018, 62, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Alugongo, G.M.; Ji, S.; Cao, Z.; Wu, Z.; Dong, S.; Li, S.; Yoon, I.; Chung, R. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on the microbial community throughout the gastrointestinal tract of calves. Animals 2018, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Hao, P.; Ning, J.; Wu, Y.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D. Yeast culture in weaned lamb feed: A proteomic journey into enhanced rumen health and growth. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 16, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quince, C.; Walker, A.W.; Simpson, J.T.; Loman, N.J.; Segata, N. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicholson, J.K.; Lindon, J.C. Metabonomics. Nature 2008, 455, 1054–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daliri, E.B.-M.; Ofosu, F.K.; Chelliah, R.; Lee, B.H.; Oh, D.H. Challenges and perspective in integrated multi-omics in gut microbiota studies. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Yang, L.; Chen, H.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Ying, C.; Li, X.; Du, R.; Liu, D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast co-cultures modulate the ruminal microbiome and metabolite availability to enhance rumen barrier function and growth performance in weaned lambs. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, D. Effects of yeast culture on growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity and hormonal profile in Mongolian ram lambs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1424073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmieder, R.; Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 863–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, D.; Salzberg, S. Kraken: Ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.; Breitwieser, F.P.; Thielen, P.; Salzberg, S.L. Bracken: Estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2016, 3, E104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mandal, S.; Van Treuren, W.; White, R.A.; Eggesbø, M.; Knight, R.; Peddada, S.D. Analysis of composition of microbiomes: A novel method for studying microbial composition. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 27663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brum, J.R.; Ignacio-Espinoza, J.C.; Roux, S.; Doulcier, G.; Acinas, S.G.; Alberti, A.; Chaffron, S.; Cruaud, C.; de Vargas, C.; Gasol, J.M.; et al. Patterns and ecological drivers of ocean viral communities. Science 2015, 348, 1261498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M.S.; Koh, A.Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhan, X. FMAP: Functional mapping and analysis pipeline for metagenomics and metatranscriptomics studies. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franzosa, E.A.; McIver, L.J.; Rahnavard, G.; Thompson, L.R.; Schirmer, M.; Weingart, G.; Lipson, K.S.; Knight, R.; Caporaso, J.G.; Segata, N.; et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villar, E.; Farrant, G.K.; Follows, M.; Garczarek, L.; Speich, S.; Audic, S.; Bittner, L.; Blanke, B.; Brum, J.R.; Brunet, C.; et al. Environmental characteristics of Agulhas rings affect interocean plankton transport. Science 2015, 348, 1261447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Want, E.J.; Masson, P.; Michopoulos, F.; Wilson, I.D.; Theodoridis, G.; Plumb, R.S.; Shockcor, J.; Loftus, N.; Holmes, E.; Nicholson, J.K. Global metabolic profiling of animal and human tissues via UPLC-MS. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 8, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Want, E.J.; O'Maille, G.; Smith, C.A.; Brandon, T.R.; Uritboonthai, W.; Qin, C.; Trauger, S.A.; Siuzdak, G. Solvent-dependent metabolite distribution, clustering, and protein extraction for serum profiling with mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barri, T.; Dragsted, L.O. UPLC-ESI-QTOF/MS and multivariate data analysis for blood plasma and serum metabolomics: Effect of experimental artefacts and anticoagulant. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 768, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, J.; Tang, B.; Wang, A.; Dong, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, C.; Sun, Y.; et al. The Genome Sequence Archive Family: Toward Explosive Data Growth and Diverse Data Types. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2021, 19, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database Resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D18–D32. [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Kwok, L.Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, H. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 may be vertically transmitted from mother to infant during lactation based on faeces metagenomics. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2024, 13, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Kim, I.H. Dietary yeast extract complex supplementation increases growth performance and nutrient digestibility of weaning pigs. Livest. Sci. 2019, 230, 103850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waititu, S.M.; Yin, F.; Patterson, R.; Yitbarek, A.; Rodriguez-Lecompte, J.C.; Nyachoti, C.M. Dietary supplementation with a nucleotide-rich yeast extract modulates gut immune response and microflora in weaned pigs in response to a sanitary challenge. Animal 2017, 11, 2156–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, M.A.; Hassan, F.U.; Rehman, M.S.; Huws, S.A.; Cheng, Y.; Din, A.U. Gut microbiome colonization and development in neonatal ruminants: Strategies, prospects, and opportunities. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, H.; Zheng, P.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; Chen, D. Effects of benzoic Acid and thymol on growth performance and gut characteristics of weaned piglets. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, X.; Tsai, T.; Howe, S.; Zhao, J. Weaning induced gut dysfunction and nutritional interventions in nursery pigs: A partial review. Animals 2021, 11, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Bottoms, K.A.; Stein, H.H.; Blav, L.; Bradley, C.L.; Bergstrom, J.; Knapp, J.; Story, R.; Maxwell, C.; Tsai, T.; et al. Dietary organic acids modulate gut microbiota and improve growth performance of nursery pigs. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Nilsson, A.; Akrami, R.; Lee, Y.S.; Vadder, F.D.; Arora, T.; Hallen, A.; Martens, E.; Bjorck, I.; Backhed, F. Dietary fiber-induced improvement in glucose metabolism is associated with increased abundance of Prevotella. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen-Poradosu, R.; McLoughlin, R.M.; Lee, J.C.; Kasper, D.L. Bacteroides fragilis–stimulated interleukin-10 contains expanding disease. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E.; Kinross, J.; Burcelin, R.; Gibson, G.; Jia, W.; Pettersson, S. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012, 336, 1262–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Luo, L.; Chen, J. Roles of mTOR signaling in tissue regeneration. Cells 2019, 8, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Tan, X.; Wang, L.; Xiong, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Yin, Y. The developmental changes in intestinal epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and shedding in weaning piglets. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 9, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, S.; Zhi, Z.; Cheng, H.; Chen, S.; Ye, X. Antioxidant and pancreatic lipase inhibitory effects of flavonoids from different citrus peel extracts: An in vitro study. Food Chem. 2020, 326, 126785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Proença, C.; Rufino, A.T.; Ferreira de Oliveira, J.M.P.; Freitas, M.; Fernandes, P.A.; Silva, A.M.S.; Fernandes, E. Inhibitory activity of flavonoids against human sucrase-isomaltase (α-glucosidase) activity in a Caco-2/TC7 cellular model. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Xu, G.; Chen, H.; Lei, H.; Su, J. Effects of quercetin on proliferation and H2O2-induced apoptosis of intestinal porcine enterocyte cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenzel, U. Flavonoids as drugs at the small intestinal level. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2013, 13, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pearlin, B.V.; Muthuvel, S.; Govidasamy, P.; Villavan, M.; Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Dhama, K.; Gopi, M. Role of acidifiers in livestock nutrition and health: A review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 558–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rychen, G.; Aquilina, G.; Azimonti, G.; Bampidis, V.; Bastos, M.d.L.; Bories, G.; Chesson, A.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Flachowsky, G.; Gropp, J.; et al. Safety and efficacy of benzoic acid for pigs and poultry. EFSA J. Eur. Food Saf. Auth. 2018, 16, e05210. [Google Scholar]







| Item | MF | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein % | 19.23 | 20.35 | 20.55 | 20.39 |
| Dry matter % | 92.04 | 93.23 | 92.58 | 93.21 |
| Neutral detergent fiber % | 34.11 | 32.45 | 33.72 | 34.23 |
| Acid detergent fiber % | 20.02 | 19.42 | 19.23 | 19.97 |
| Live yeast cells, CFU/g | - | 6.8 × 104 | 1.5 × 104 | 7.2 × 104 |
| Lactic acid mmol/kg | - | 371.13 | 391.57 | 380.31 |
| Cellulase U/g | - | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.91 |
| Protease U/g | 2.67 | 9.56 | 8.23 | 9.88 |
| Amylase U/g | 3.69 | 6.11 | 7.28 | 7.65 |
| Ingredients | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peanutvine | 9.30 | 9.30 | 9.30 | 9.30 |
| Corn stalk | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Sunflower seed skin | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Alfalfa meal | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Corngrain | 29.00 | 29.00 | 29.00 | 29.00 |
| Soybean meal | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Germ meal | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Cottonmeal | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| DDGS Distillers Dried Grainswith Solubles | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Sunflower Cakes | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 |
| NaCl | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Limestone | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| CaHPO4 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 4%Premix 1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | ||||
| ME 2, MJ/kg | 10.19 | 10.21 | 10.18 | 10.22 |
| Dry matter % | 89.77 | 88.25 | 88.13 | 87.75 |
| Crude protein % | 15.62 | 16.23 | 15.98 | 16.85 |
| Neutral detergent fiber % | 33.35 | 34.03 | 33.45 | 33.38 |
| Acid detergent fiber % | 21.40 | 20.99 | 21.38 | 21.59 |
| Items | Groups | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |||
| Initial mean weight, kg | 22.26 | 21.79 | 21.57 | 22.45 | 0.204 | 1.2 × 10−1 |
| Average body weight on day 40, kg | 33.76 | 34.11 | 33.97 | 35.37 | 0.363 | 4.0 × 10−1 |
| ADG, kg/d | 0.29 a | 0.31 ab | 0.31 ab | 0.32 b | 0.007 | 1.2 × 10−4 |
| ADFI, kg/d | 1.52 a | 1.54 ab | 1.55 ab | 1.64 b | 0.027 | 2.0 × 10−3 |
| F:G | 5.24 a | 4.97 b | 5.00 ab | 5.13 ab | 0.062 | 1.4 × 10−2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, L.; Xu, Z.; Liu, D. The Effects of Dual-Yeast Compound Preparation on the Intestinal Health and Metabolism of Lambs. Animals 2026, 16, 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040637
Yang L, Xu Z, Liu D. The Effects of Dual-Yeast Compound Preparation on the Intestinal Health and Metabolism of Lambs. Animals. 2026; 16(4):637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040637
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Lan, Zixuan Xu, and Dacheng Liu. 2026. "The Effects of Dual-Yeast Compound Preparation on the Intestinal Health and Metabolism of Lambs" Animals 16, no. 4: 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040637
APA StyleYang, L., Xu, Z., & Liu, D. (2026). The Effects of Dual-Yeast Compound Preparation on the Intestinal Health and Metabolism of Lambs. Animals, 16(4), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040637
