Modulation of Intestinal Energy Metabolism and Microbial Profiles by Dietary Starch Characteristics Under EGCG Supplementation in Broiler Chickens
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Ethics
2.2. Materials
2.3. Experimental Design and Dietary Treatments
2.4. Growth Performance and Postprandial Glucose Response
2.5. Sample Collection
2.6. Intestinal Starch Utilization and Enzyme Activities
2.7. Evaluation of Intestinal Energy Homeostasis
2.8. Expression of Genes Related to Glucose Transport and Energy Metabolism
2.9. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing
2.10. Bioinformatics Analysis
2.11. Metabolite Extraction, Profiling, and Analysis
2.12. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Postprandial Blood Glucose Response
3.3. Intestinal Starch Utilization and Enzyme Activities
3.4. Intestinal Energy Status
3.5. Energy Metabolism-Related Enzyme Activities in Jejunal and Ileal Mucosa
3.6. Expression of Genes Related to Glucose Transport and Energy Metabolism
3.7. Cecal Microbial Compositions
3.7.1. Bacterial α-Diversity
3.7.2. Bacterial β-Diversity and Taxonomic Composition of Microbial Communities
3.8. Analysis of Cecal Differential Metabolites Between Treatments
3.9. KEGG Enrichment Analysis
3.10. Correlation Analysis Between Intestinal Energy Status, Cecal Microbiota, and Cecal Metabolites
4. Discussion
4.1. Growth Performance
4.2. Starch Utilization and Glucose Availability
4.3. Intestinal Energy Metabolism
4.4. Gene Expression in Intestine
4.5. Intestinal Microbiota Composition and Metabolites
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gromova, L.V.; Fetissov, S.O.; Gruzdkov, A.A. Mechanisms of Glucose Absorption in the Small Intestine in Health and Metabolic Diseases and Their Role in Appetite Regulation. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.S.; Wang, R.X.; Alexeev, E.E.; Colgan, S.P. Intestinal Inflammation as a Dysbiosis of Energy Procurement: New Insights into an Old Topic. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1880241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Svihus, B. Starch digestion capacity of poultry1. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2394–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, C.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Z.F.; He, X.X.; Zhang, C.Y.; Yang, H.M.; Rose, S.P.; Wang, Z.Y. Effects of different dietary starch sources on growth and glucose metabolism of geese. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, D.; Selle, P.H.; Moss, A.F.; Wang, Y.; Dong, X.; Xiao, Z.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, J. Influence of starch sources and dietary protein levels on intestinal functionality and intestinal mucosal amino acids catabolism in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Du, B.; Nian, F.; Ru, Y.; Sun, L.; Qin, S.; Tang, D. Effects of Processing Methods and Conditioning Temperatures on the Cassava Starch Digestibility and Growth Performance of Broilers. Animals 2023, 13, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carré, B.; Melcion, J.P.; Widiez, J.L.; Biot, P. Effects of various processes of fractionation, grinding and storage of peas on the digestibility of pea starch in chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998, 71, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, N.K.; Choct, M. Cassava: Nutrient composition and nutritive value in poultry diets. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 2, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perz, K.; Kaczmarek, S.A.; Nowaczewski, S.; Cowieson, A.J.; Jarosz, Ł.; Ciszewski, A.; Hejdysz, M. The effect of reduction of resistant starch content of faba bean and pea by amylase supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, and sialic acid excretion of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2023, 298, 115621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, C.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Yin, D.; Meng, G.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Yuan, J. Different starch sources and amino acid levels on growth performance, starch and amino acids digestion, absorption and metabolism of 0- to 3-week-old broilers fed low protein diet. Anim. Nutr. 2025, 20, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lv, X.; Hong, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Jiang, C. Structural Features and Digestibility of Corn Starch With Different Amylose Content. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 692673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, C.; Chen, Y.; Ye, X.; Wang, L.; Shao, J.; Jing, H.; Jiang, C.; Wang, H.; Ma, C. Three flavanols delay starch digestion by inhibiting α-amylase and binding with starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soussi, A.; Gargouri, M.; Magné, C.; Ben-Nasr, H.; Kausar, M.A.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Saeed, M.; Snoussi, M.; Adnan, M.; El-Feki, A.; et al. (−)-Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) pharmacokinetics and molecular interactions towards amelioration of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia associated hepatorenal oxidative injury in alloxan induced diabetic mice. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2022, 368, 110230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Miao, M. Dietary polyphenols modulate starch digestion and glycaemic level: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Lv, Y.-J.; Pan, J.-X.; Jiang, Y.-L.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Zhang, S.-K. Effects of tea polyphenols and EGCG on glucose metabolism and intestinal flora in diabetic mice fed a cornstarch-based functional diet. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, e50821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Li, S.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Xie, B.; Sun, Z. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) inhibits starch digestion and improves glucose homeostasis through direct or indirect activation of PXR/CAR-mediated phase II metabolism in diabetic mice. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 4651–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Noh, S.K.; Koo, S.I. Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine Differentially Inhibit the Intestinal Absorption of Cholesterol and Fat in Ovariectomized Rats1. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2006, 136, 2791–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, C.S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y. Mechanisms of body weight reduction and metabolic syndrome alleviation by tea. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lin, S.; Wang, Z.; Lam, K.-L.; Zeng, S.; Tan, B.K.; Hu, J. Role of intestinal microecology in the regulation of energy metabolism by dietary polyphenols and their metabolites. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 63, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NY/T 33-2004; Feeding Standard of Chicken. Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2004.
- Azzam, M.M.; Zou, X.T.; Dong, X.Y.; Xie, P. Effect of supplemental L-threonine on mucin 2 gene expression and intestine mucosal immune and digestive enzymes activities of laying hens in environments with high temperature and humidity. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2251–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, D.; Hou, Y.; Tan, L.; Liao, M.; Xie, J.; Wang, L.; Ding, B.; Yang, Y.; Gong, J. N-acetylcysteine improves the growth performance and intestinal function in the heat-stressed broilers. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 2016, 220, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.L.; Wang, Y.W.; Song, D.; Hou, Y.J.; Wang, W.W.; Qi, W.T.; Yun, T.T.; Li, A.K. The effects of dietary supplementation of pre-microencapsulated Enterococcus fecalis and the extract of Camellia oleifera seed on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and intestinal mucosal immune functions in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 2016, 212, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siriwan, P.; Bryden, W.L.; Mollah, Y.; Annison, E.F. Measurement of endogenous amino acid losses in poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 1993, 34, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xi, M.; Jiang, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Di, M.; Cong, Y.; Zhang, R. Alterations in Methionine Cycle and Wnt/MAPK Signaling Associated with HMBi-Induced Cashmere Growth in Goats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Beger, R.D.; Goodacre, R.; Jones, C.M.; Lippa, K.A.; Mayboroda, O.A.; O’Neill, D.; Najdekr, L.; Ntai, I.; Wilson, I.D.; Dunn, W.B. Analysis types and quantification methods applied in UHPLC-MS metabolomics research: A tutorial. Metabolomics 2024, 20, 95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cao, B.H.; Karasawa, Y.; Guo, Y.M. Effects of Green Tea Polyphenols and Fructo-oligosaccharides in Semi-purified Diets on Broilers’ Performance and Caecal Microflora and Their Metabolites. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, S.Y.; Yang, C.J. Effect of Green Tea Probiotics on the Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Immune Response in Finishing Pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Liu, W.; Liang, K.; Li, F. Assessment of the Impact of Dietary Supplementation with Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) on Antioxidant Status, Immune Response, and Intestinal Microbiota in Post-Weaning Rabbits. Animals 2024, 14, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.B.P.; Zhou, Y.B.; Sang, B.Y.; Wan, X.C.; Yang, Y.O.; Zhang, J.L.; Welker, T.L.; Liu, K.S. Effect of dietary Chinese tea on growth performance, disease resistance and muscle fatty acid profile of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquac. Int. 2015, 23, 683–698. [Google Scholar]
- Janaswamy, S. Encapsulation altered starch digestion: Toward developing starch-based delivery systems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Fang, G.; Man, Y.; Liu, Y. Effect of Ultrasound-Assisted Isolation on Yield and Properties of High-Amylose Starch from Amylomaize. Starch-Starke 2019, 71, 1800292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, J.; Lv, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y. Effect of tea products on the in vitro enzymatic digestibility of starch. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ren, F. Formation and Application of Starch–Polyphenol Complexes: Influencing Factors and Rapid Screening Based on Chemometrics. Foods 2024, 13, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ogbuewu, I.P.; Mbajiorgu, C.A. Meta-analysis of substitution value of maize with cassava (Manihot esculenta Cratnz) on growth performance of broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 997128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, S.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, L. Enzymic catalyzing affinity to substrate affects inhibitor-enzyme binding interactions: Inhibition behaviors of EGCG against starch digestion by individual and co-existing α-amylase and amyloglucosidase. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 133047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Shen, M.; Xiao, W.; Li, Y.; Pan, W.; Xie, J. Regulating the physicochemical and structural properties of different starches by complexation with tea polyphenols. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 142, 108836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Xie, H.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, X.; Dong, H.; Liu, X.; Bai, W. Multiscale structure changes and mechanism of polyphenol-amylose complexes modulated by polyphenolic structures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 130086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, G.; Cao, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, L. α-Amylase inhibition of a certain dietary polyphenol is predominantly affected by the concentration of α-1, 4-glucosidic bonds in starchy and artificial substrates. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simsek, M.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Nichols, B.L.; Hamaker, B.R. Dietary Phenolic Compounds Selectively Inhibit the Individual Subunits of Maltase-Glucoamylase and Sucrase-Isomaltase with the Potential of Modulating Glucose Release. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3873–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forester, S.C.; Gu, Y.; Lambert, J.D. Inhibition of starch digestion by the green tea polyphenol, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 1647–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, N.; Gupta, S.; Mahmood, A. Gallic acid inhibits brush border disaccharidases in mammalian intestine. Nutr. Res. 2007, 27, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, Y.; Quan, W.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Jiao, Y. Comprehensive Review of EGCG Modification: Esterification Methods and Their Impacts on Biological Activities. Foods 2024, 13, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Promthong, S.; Kanto, U.; Tirawattanawanich, C.; Tongyai, S.; Isariyodom, S.; Markvichitr, K.; Engkagul, A. The Comparative Effects of Corn and Cassava Diets on Physiological Properties of Gastrointestinal Tract of Broilers. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2004, 38, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
- Fuller, G.G.; Kim, J.K. Compartmentalization and metabolic regulation of glycolysis. J. Cell Sci. 2021, 134, jcs258469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kierans, S.J.; Taylor, C.T. Glycolysis: A multifaceted metabolic pathway and signaling hub. J. Biol. Chem. 2024, 300, 107906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iannello, S.; Milazzo, P.; Belfiore, F. Animal and Human Tissue Na,K-ATPase in Obesity and Diabetes: A New Proposed Enzyme Regulation. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2007, 333, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akbarian, A.; Michiels, J.; Degroote, J.; Majdeddin, M.; Golian, A.; De Smet, S. Association between heat stress and oxidative stress in poultry; mitochondrial dysfunction and dietary interventions with phytochemicals. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Feng, C.; Zhang, H.; Ren, F.; Liu, H. The regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism through the interaction of dietary polyphenols and polysaccharides via the gut microbiota pathway. Food Funct. 2024, 15, 8200–8216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeh, L.-C.; Shyu, H.-W.; Jin, Y.-R.; Chiou, Y.-H.; Lin, K.-H.; Chou, M.-C.; Huang, M.-H.; Wang, Y.-F. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate downregulates PDHA1 interfering the metabolic pathways in human herpesvirus 8 harboring primary effusion lymphoma cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2020, 65, 104753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, B.J.; Zhu, Q.; Zhong, Y.L.; Xu, S.H.; Wang, Z. Chlorogenic Acid Maintains Glucose Homeostasis through Modulating the Expression of SGLT-1, GLUT-2, and PLG in Different Intestinal Segments of Sprague-Dawley Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manalo, D.J.; Baek, J.H.; Buehler, P.W.; Struble, E.; Abraham, B.; Alayash, A.I. Inactivation of prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) protein by epigallocatechin (EGCG) stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1α) and induces hepcidin (Hamp) in rat kidney. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 416, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batie, M.; Frost, J.; Frost, M.; Wilson, J.W.; Schofield, P.; Rocha, S. Hypoxia induces rapid changes to histone methylation and reprograms chromatin. Science 2019, 363, 1222–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, F.; Li, M.; Liu, W.-B.; Zhou, Z.-S.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.-L.; Zhou, K.-C. Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits human tongue carcinoma cells via HK2-mediated glycolysis. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1533–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Jiménez, L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lešnik, S.; Jukić, M.; Bren, U. Unveiling polyphenol-protein interactions: A comprehensive computational analysis. J. Cheminform. 2025, 17, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardona, F.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Tulipani, S.; Tinahones, F.J.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, L.; Liu, C.; Wu, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, M.; Bi, C.; Shan, A.; Dou, X. EGCG improve meat quality, restore lipid metabolism disorder and regulate intestinal flora in high-fat fed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 104875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Ning, Y.; Yuan, C.; Cui, B.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Z. The protective mechanism of a debranched corn starch/konjac glucomannan composite against dyslipidemia and gut microbiota in high-fat-diet induced type 2 diabetes. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 9273–9285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adebowale, T.O.; Yao, K.; Oso, A.O. Major cereal carbohydrates in relation to intestinal health of monogastric animals: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 5, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, W.; Sun, C.; Yuan, J.; Yang, N. Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Z.; Yu, L.; Cao, J.; Yu, J.; Lin, Z.; Hong, Y.; Jiang, S.; Chen, C.; Mi, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Lactobacillus salivarius Promotion of Intestinal Stem Cell Activity in Hens Is Associated with Succinate-Induced Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism. mSystems 2022, 7, e00903–e00922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wan, F.; Wen, X.; Zhao, H.; Tang, S.; Wang, M.; Yi, B.; Chen, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhong, R.; Zhang, H. Chemically protected sodium butyrate supplementation improves anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capacities potentially through modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids levels in piglets. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 121, 106434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morvaridzadeh, M.; Alami, M.; Berrougui, H.; Boumezough, K.; Sidibé, H.; Salih, I.; Sadki, K.; Khalil, A. Polyphenol-Microbiota Interactions in Atherosclerosis: The Role of Hydroxytyrosol and Tyrosol in Modulating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iglesias-Aguirre, C.E.; Cortés-Martín, A.; Ávila-Gálvez, M.Á.; Giménez-Bastida, J.A.; Selma, M.V.; González-Sarrías, A.; Espín, J.C. Main drivers of (poly)phenol effects on human health: Metabolite production and/or gut microbiota-associated metabotypes? Food Funct. 2021, 12, 10324–10355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chanda, B.; Xia, Y.; Mandal, M.K.; Yu, K.S.; Sekine, K.T.; Gao, Q.M.; Selote, D.; Hu, Y.L.; Stromberg, A.; Navarre, D.; et al. Glycerol-3-phosphate is a critical mobile inducer of systemic immunity in plants. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madiraju, S.R.M.; Possik, E.; Al-Mulla, F.; Nolan, C.J.; Prentki, M. Glycerol and Glycerol-3-Phosphate: Multifaceted Metabolites in Metabolism, Cancer, and Other Diseases. Endocr. Rev. 2026, 47, 93–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Y.; Yu, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhong, N.; Hua, S.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Tan, R.; Liu, Y.; et al. Crotonate enhances intestinal regeneration after injury via HBO1-mediated H3K14 crotonylation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biddle, A.; Stewart, L.; Blanchard, J.; Leschine, S. Untangling the Genetic Basis of Fibrolytic Specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in Diverse Gut Communities. Diversity 2013, 5, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Ingredients, % | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 59.65 | 59.60 | 37.37 | 37.81 | 38.65 |
| Soybean meal [CP, 46%] | 22.80 | 22.80 | 27.45 | 26.80 | 23.818 |
| Corn starch | 0 | 0 | 20.00 | 0 | 0 |
| Cassava starch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.00 | 0 |
| Pea starch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.00 |
| Wheat middling | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corn gluten meal [CP, 60%] | 5.80 | 5.80 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.50 |
| DL-Met | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.35 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.80 |
| Limestone | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.651 |
| L-Lys | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 |
| Try | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Thr | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| NaCl | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.301 |
| Soybean oil | 3.80 | 3.80 | 4.20 | 4.40 | 5.00 |
| Choline chloride 50% | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| EGCG | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Premix (1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels, % (2) | |||||
| AME, Mcal/kg | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.05 | 3.06 | 3.04 |
| CP | 19.03 | 19.03 | 19.00 | 18.80 | 18.50 |
| Lys | 1.158 | 1.160 | 1.112 | 1.096 | 1.075 |
| Met | 0.587 | 0.588 | 0.578 | 0.594 | 0.625 |
| Thr | 0.660 | 0.662 | 0.809 | 0.849 | 0.776 |
| Ca | 0.865 | 0.865 | 0.861 | 0.856 | 0.857 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.407 | 0.407 | 0.403 | 0.401 | 0.403 |
| Starch (3) | 49.3 | 49.3 | 58.5 | 58.0 | 56.3 |
| Amylose (3) | 12.3 | 12.3 | 15.8 | 11.0 | 19.7 |
| Amylopectin (3) | 37.0 | 37.0 | 42.7 | 47.0 | 36.6 |
| Gene Name | Accession Number | Forward Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Reverse Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGLT1 | XM_415247 | AGATTTGGAGGGCACAGGAT | GCCCAAAGAGATTTGGATGA |
| GLUT2 | Z22932 | CCGCAGAAGGTGATAGAAGC | ATTGTCCCTGGAGGTGTT |
| HIF-1α | XM_046917648.1 | ATCAGAGTGGTTGTCCAGCAG | CAGTCCAAGCCCACCTTACT |
| PDK1 | NM_001031352.4 | GTGGCGGAGGTGTTCCTATGAG | GTATTGTGCGTACAGGCGTGATATG |
| HK2 | NM_204212.2 | CCACCGCCTCCGTCAAGATG | CCAGGTCCAGTGCCAAGAAGTC |
| β-actin | NM_205518 | GAGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCA | CCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCA |
| Items | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight, g | |||||||
| 14 d | 352.78 | 358.89 | 363.89 | 362.78 | 356.67 | 2.256 | 0.536 |
| 35 d | 1563.89 b | 1306.67 a | 1617.22 b | 1593.33 b | 1596.11 b | 21.123 | <0.001 |
| 42 d | 2042.22 b | 1731.11 a | 2081.67 b | 2022.22 b | 2042.78 b | 22.843 | <0.001 |
| 14–35 d | |||||||
| ADG, g | 57.67 a | 45.13 b | 59.68 a | 58.60 a | 59.02 a | 0.994 | 0.001 |
| ADFI, g | 95.16 a | 79.69 b | 96.28 a | 95.94 a | 98.14 a | 1.172 | 0.001 |
| FCR | 1.66 b | 1.77 a | 1.62 b | 1.64 b | 1.66 b | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| 35–42 d | |||||||
| ADG, g | 95.67 | 84.89 | 92.89 | 85.78 | 89.33 | 1.926 | 0.345 |
| ADFI, g | 176.04 a | 155.96 b | 180.58 a | 173.07 a | 179.31 a | 1.987 | 0.001 |
| FCR | 1.88 | 1.85 | 1.96 | 2.07 | 2.02 | 0.036 | 0.303 |
| 14–42 d | |||||||
| ADG, g | 61.89 a | 52.64 b | 63.08 a | 61.28 a | 61.90 a | 0.692 | 0.001 |
| ADFI, g | 110.14 a | 93.81 b | 111.89 a | 110.23 a | 113.17 a | 1.201 | 0.001 |
| FCR | 1.78 b | 1.79 ab | 1.78 b | 1.80 ab | 1.83 a | 0.007 | 0.125 |
| Treatment | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-amylase, U/mg prot | 0.518 | 0.683 | 0.493 | 0.510 | 0.575 | 0.044 | 0.675 |
| Sucrase, U/mg prot | 204.917 a | 172.969 a | 185.545 a | 190.285 a | 99.082 b | 11.954 | 0.032 |
| Maltase, U/mg prot | 223.244 ab | 197.707 b | 152.231 b | 322.827 a | 207.840 b | 16.823 | 0.014 |
| Treatment | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jejunum | |||||||
| AMP | 286.52 a | 231.45 c | 266.48 b | 218.87 c | 259.73 b | 4.993 | <0.001 |
| ATP | 691.06 b | 657.38 bc | 848.26 a | 851.66 a | 625.10 c | 18.797 | <0.001 |
| cAMP | 48.55 b | 43.49 c | 57.78 a | 50.64 b | 54.88 a | 1.021 | <0.001 |
| AMP/ATP | 0.416 a | 0.353 b | 0.314 c | 0.257 d | 0.417 a | 0.012 | <0.001 |
| Ileum | |||||||
| AMP | 258.52 a | 220.50 bc | 248.99 a | 214.35 c | 230.78 b | 3.547 | <0.001 |
| ATP | 652.36 b | 638.63 b | 723.81 a | 751.27 a | 620.57 b | 11.646 | <0.001 |
| cAMP | 44.26 c | 43.85 c | 50.61 a | 44.17 c | 47.18 b | 0.594 | <0.001 |
| AMP/ATP | 0.398 a | 0.346 b | 0.345 b | 0.286 c | 0.374 ab | 0.008 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jejunum | |||||||
| Na+-K+-ATPase, ng/L | 419.31 bc | 433.12 b | 499.58 a | 402.77 c | 413.64 bc | 7.031 | <0.001 |
| Cs, pg/mL | 111.55 a | 86.16 c | 110.95 a | 91.23 bc | 93.33 b | 2.147 | <0.001 |
| PDH, ng/L | 212.59 a | 166.06 c | 215.59 a | 185.86 b | 188.94 b | 3.663 | <0.001 |
| Ileum | |||||||
| Na+-K+-ATPase, ng/L | 398.35 b | 497.46 a | 418.88 b | 413.51 b | 469.99 a | 8.15 | <0.001 |
| Cs, pg/mL | 90.25 c | 87.73 c | 113.27 a | 110.89 ab | 106.01 b | 2.16 | <0.001 |
| PDH, ng/L | 192.39 b | 209.46 a | 169.98 c | 188.23 b | 195.17 b | 2.78 | <0.001 |
| Gene | Treatment | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLT1 | Jejunum | 0.39 ab | 1.00 a | 0.28 b | 0.29 b | 0.89 ab | 0.100 | 0.048 |
| Ileum | 1.00 b | 1.00 b | 1.88 a | 1.08 b | 1.33 b | 0.099 | 0.005 | |
| GLUT2 | Jejunum | 0.35 b | 1.00 a | 0.44 b | 0.53 b | 0.61 b | 0.069 | 0.010 |
| Ileum | 0.35 | 1.00 | 1.78 | 1.76 | 3.62 | 0.333 | 0.066 | |
| HIF-1α | Jejunum | 0.08 b | 1.00 a | 0.14 b | 0.06 b | 0.32 b | 0.101 | 0.006 |
| Ileum | 1.30 | 1.00 | 2.50 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.248 | 0.242 | |
| PDK1 | Jejunum | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.82 | 0.103 | 0.102 |
| Ileum | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 0.072 | 0.806 | |
| HK2 | Jejunum | 1.65 ab | 1.00 b | 0.62 b | 0.94 b | 2.18 a | 0.177 | 0.022 |
| Ileum | 0.61 c | 1.00 bc | 1.74 ab | 1.27 bc | 2.50 a | 0.171 | 0.001 |
| Treatment | NC | PC | CS | TS | PS | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chao1 | 627.363 a | 604.068 ab | 686.398 a | 584.988 ab | 491.779 b | 20.317 | 0.031 |
| dominance | 0.053 | 0.137 | 0.060 | 0.121 | 0.104 | 0.012 | 0.067 |
| goods_coverage | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.159 |
| observed_features | 608.167 a | 568.333 ab | 660.333 a | 561.333 ab | 478.333 b | 19.695 | 0.041 |
| pielou_e | 0.654 a | 0.556 c | 0.646 ab | 0.567 bc | 0.559 c | 0.014 | 0.037 |
| shannon | 6.048 a | 5.087 b | 6.052 a | 5.179 ab | 4.975 b | 0.154 | 0.031 |
| simpson | 0.947 | 0.863 | 0.940 | 0.879 | 0.897 | 0.012 | 0.067 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, K.; Yin, D. Modulation of Intestinal Energy Metabolism and Microbial Profiles by Dietary Starch Characteristics Under EGCG Supplementation in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2026, 16, 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16152445
Liu W, Zhang R, Zhu Y, Liang K, Yin D. Modulation of Intestinal Energy Metabolism and Microbial Profiles by Dietary Starch Characteristics Under EGCG Supplementation in Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2026; 16(15):2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16152445
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Wanqin, Ruiyang Zhang, Yanli Zhu, Kai Liang, and Dafei Yin. 2026. "Modulation of Intestinal Energy Metabolism and Microbial Profiles by Dietary Starch Characteristics Under EGCG Supplementation in Broiler Chickens" Animals 16, no. 15: 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16152445
APA StyleLiu, W., Zhang, R., Zhu, Y., Liang, K., & Yin, D. (2026). Modulation of Intestinal Energy Metabolism and Microbial Profiles by Dietary Starch Characteristics Under EGCG Supplementation in Broiler Chickens. Animals, 16(15), 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16152445
