Genetic Inertia in Urban Populations of the Common Toad (Bufo bufo): Evidence from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Field Work
2.3. Genetic Analyses
2.3.1. Nuclear DNA
2.3.2. mtDNA
2.4. Analysis of Population Genetic Structure Based on Nuclear DNA
2.5. Feature Selection Analysis Integrating Genetic, Ecological and Morphological Traits
3. Results
3.1. Genetic Variability Based on Nuclear DNA
3.2. Population Genetic Structure Reflected by Nuclear DNA
3.3. Features Differentiating Sampling Sites and Clusters
3.4. mtDNA Diversity of Urban Individuals
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- McKinney, M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 2002, 52, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanski, I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 1998, 396, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34, 487–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cushman, S.A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 128, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, D.H.; Frankham, R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyghobadi, N.; Roland, J.; Strobeck, C. Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 1897–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noël, S.; Ouellet, M.; Galois, P.; Lapointe, F.J. Impact of urban fragmentation on the genetic structure of the eastern red-backed salamander. Conserv. Genet. 2007, 8, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppä, P.; Laurila, A. Genetic structure of island populations of the anurans Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo. Heredity 1999, 82, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delaney, K.S.; Riley, S.P.D.; Fisher, R.N. A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holzhauer, S.I.J.; Ekschmitt, K.; Sander, A.C.; Dauber, J.; Wolters, V. Effect of historic landscape change on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeselii. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orsini, L.; Corander, J.; Alasentie, A.; Hanski, I. Genetic spatial structure in a butterfly metapopulation correlates better with past than present demographic structure. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 2629–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allendorf, F.W.; Luikart, G. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Collins, M.K.; Magle, S.B.; Gallo, T. Global trends in urban wildlife ecology and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2021, 261, 109236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rega-Brodsky, C.C.; Aronson, M.F.; Piana, M.R.; Carpenter, E.S.; Hahs, A.K.; Herrera-Montes, A.; Knapp, S.; Kotze, D.J.; Lepczyk, C.A.; Moretti, M.; et al. Urban biodiversity: State of the science and future directions. Urban Ecosyst. 2022, 25, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordier, J.M.; Aguilar, R.; Lescano, J.N. A global assessment of amphibian and reptile responses to land-use changes. Biol. Conserv. 2021, 253, 108863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, K.M.; Gibbons, J.W.; Jochimsen, D.M.; Mitchell, J. Ecological effects of roads on amphibians and reptiles: A literature review. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 3, 121–143. [Google Scholar]
- Cooke, A.S. Road mortality of common toads (Bufo bufo) near a breeding site. Amphibia-Reptilia 1995, 16, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hels, T.; Buchwald, E. The effect of road kills on amphibian populations. Biol. Conserv. 2001, 99, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parris, K.M. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, X.; Llorente, G.A.; Montori, A.; Carretero, M.A.; Franch, M.; Garriga, N.; Richter-Boix, A. Evaluating factors affecting amphibian mortality on roads: The case of the common toad Bufo bufo, near a breeding place. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 30, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamer, A.J.; McDonnell, M.J. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2432–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semlitsch, R.D. Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians. J. Wildl. Manag. 2000, 64, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, B.J.; Richardson, J.M.L. The effect of artificial light on male breeding-season behaviour in green frogs, Rana clamitans melanota. Can. J. Zool. 2006, 84, 1528–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulíček, P.; Pišút, P. Genetic structure of the marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) populations in urban landscape. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2012, 58, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luedtke, J.A.; Chanson, J.; Neam, K. Ongoing declines for the world’s amphibians in the face of emerging threats. Nature 2023, 622, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padhye, A.D.; Mahabaleshwarkar, M.; Ghate, H.V. An overview of amphibian fauna of Pune District with special reference to their status in and around Pune City. Zoos’ Print J. 2002, 17, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landguth, E.L.; Cushman, S.A.; Schwartz, M.K.; McKelvey, K.S.; Murphy, M.; Luikart, G. Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19, 4179–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bókony, V.; Üveges, B.; Verebélyi, V. Toads phenotypically adjust their chemical defences to anthropogenic habitat change. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hitchings, S.; Beebee, T.J.C. Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. J. Evol. Biol. 1998, 11, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinsch, U. Migratory behaviour of the common toad Bufo bufo and the natterjack toad Bufo calamita. In Amphibians and Roads, Proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference, Rendsburg, Germany, 7–8 January 1989; Langton, T.E.S., Ed.; ACO Polymer Products Ltd.: Bedfordshire, UK, 1989; pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
- Reading, C.J.; Loman, J.; Madsen, T. Breeding pond fidelity in common toads, Bufo bufo. J. Zool. 1991, 225, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heusser, H. Die Lebensweise der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). Das Orientierungsproblem. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1969, 76, 444–517. [Google Scholar]
- Kovar, R.; Brabec, M.; Vita, R.; Bocek, R. Spring migration distances of some Central European amphibian species. Amphibia-Reptilia 2009, 30, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elzanowski, A.; Ciesiołkiewicz, J.; Kaczor, M.; Radwańska, J.; Urban, R. Amphibian road mortality in Europe: A meta-analysis with new data from Poland. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2009, 55, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahrig, L.; Pedlar, J.H.; Pope, S.E.; Taylor, P.D.; Wegner, J.F. Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol. Conserv. 1995, 73, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Gelder, J.J. A quantitative approach to the mortality resulting from traffic in a population of Bufo bufo L. Oecologia 1973, 13, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orłowski, G. Spatial distribution and seasonal pattern in road mortality of the common toad Bufo bufo in an agricultural landscape of south-western Poland. Amphibia-Reptilia 2007, 28, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargová, V.; Gužiová, D.; Balogová, M. Urban environment determines population genetics in the green toad, Bufotes viridis. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2023, 69, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houlahan, J.E.; Findlay, C.S.; Schmidt, B.R.; Meyer, A.H.; Kuzmin, S.L. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 2000, 404, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaczmarski, M.; Szala, K. Shift in the breeding period of the European green toad Bufotes viridis—A case study from the Cytadela city park in Poznań. Przegl. Przyr. 2020, 31, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Mazgajska, J.; Mazgajski, T.D. Two amphibian species in the urban environment: Changes in the occurrence, spawning phenology, and adult condition of common and green toads. Eur. Zool. J. 2020, 87, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chondrelli, N.; Kuehn, E.; Meurling, S.; Cortázar-Chinarro, M.; Laurila, A.; Höglund, J. Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis strain affects transcriptomic response in liver but not skin in latitudinal populations of the common toad (Bufo bufo). Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Budzik, K.A.; Budzik, K.M.; Żuwała, K. Amphibian situation in urban environment—History of the common toad Bufo bufo in Kraków (Poland). Ecol. Quest. 2013, 18, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczmarek, J.M.; Kaczmarski, M.; Pędziwiatr, K. Changes in the batrachofauna in the city of Poznań over 20 years. In Urban Fauna: Animal, Man, and the City—Interactions and Relationships; Böhner, J., Indykiewicz, P., Eds.; ArtStudio: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2014; pp. 169–178. [Google Scholar]
- Konowalik, A.; Najbar, A.; Konowalik, K.; Dylewski, Ł.; Frydlewicz, M.; Kisiel, P.; Starzecka, A.; Zaleśna, A.; Kolenda, K. Amphibians in an urban environment: A case study from a central European city (Wrocław, Poland). Urban Ecosyst. 2020, 23, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
- Mazgajska, J. Zmiany składu gatunkowego batrachofauny Warszawy w ostatnich piętnastu latach, w związku z przekształceniami środowisk rozrodczych. In Biologia Płazów i Gadów—Ochrona Herpetofauny. IX Ogólnopolska Konferencja Herpetologiczna, Kraków, 22–23.09.2008; Zamachowski, W., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej: Kraków, Poland, 2008; pp. 66–67. [Google Scholar]
- Carrier, J.A.; Beebee, T.J.C. Recent, substantial and unexplained declines of the common toad Bufo bufo in lowland England. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 111, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilton-Brown, D.; Oldham, R.S. The Status of the Widespread Amphibians and Reptiles in Britain, 1990, and Changes During the 1980s; Nature Conservancy Council: Peterborough, UK, 1991.
- Brede, E.G.; Beebee, T.J.C. Contrasting population structures in two sympatric anurans: Implications for species conservation. Heredity 2004, 92, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Solano, I.; Gonzalez, E.G. Patterns of gene flow and source–sink dynamics in high altitude populations of the common toad Bufo bufo (Anura: Bufonidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 95, 824–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babik, W.; Marszałek, M.; Dudek, K.; Antunes, B.; Palomar, G.; Zając, B.; Taugbøl, A.; Pabijan, M. Limited evidence for genetic differentiation or adaptation in two amphibian species across replicated rural–urban gradients. Evol. Appl. 2024, 17, e13700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marsh, D.M.; Page, R.B.; Hanlon, T.J.; Bareke, H.; Corritone, R.; Jetter, N.; Beckman, N.G.; Gardner, K.; Seifert, D.E.; Cabe, P.R. Ecological and genetic evidence that low-order streams inhibit dispersal of red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus). Can. J. Zool. 2007, 85, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, T.; Yan, P.; Yang, P.; Wang, H.; Ali, I.; Ayub, M.; Zhang, J.H.; Wang, J.; Li, E.; Xue, H.; et al. Genetic differentiation of regional populations of the widespread Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans), as revealed by development of novel microsatellite markers. Aust. J. Zool. 2019, 66, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vences, M.; Perl, R.G.B.; Giesen, K.; Schluckebier, R.; Simon, K.; Schmidt, E.; Steinfartz, S.; Ziegler, T. Development of new microsatellite markers for the green toad, Bufotes viridis, to assess population structure at its northwestern range boundary in Germany. Salamandra 2019, 55, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
- Jędrzejewski, W.; Nowak, S.; Stachura, K.; Skierczyński, M.; Mysłajek, R.W.; Niedziałkowski, K.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Wójcik, J.M.; Zalewska, H.; Pilot, M.; et al. Projekt Korytarzy Ekologicznych Łączących Europejską Sieć Natura 2000 w Polsce; Zakład Badania Ssaków PAN: Białowieża, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Szulczewska, B.; Kaliszuk, E. Challenges in the planning and management of ‘Greenstructure’ in Warsaw, Poland. Built Environ. 2003, 29, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazgajska, J. Distribution of amphibians in urban water bodies (Warsaw agglomeration, Poland). Ekol. Pol. 1996, 44, 245–257. [Google Scholar]
- Mazgajska, J. The studies on batrachofauna in Warsaw in 1992–1994. In Urban Fauna; Barczak, T., Indykiewicz, P., Eds.; Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 1998; pp. 231–240. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Mazgajska, J. Amphibians of Wawer district of the Warsaw agglomeration. Fragm. Faun. 2009, 52, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sztencel-Jabłonka, A.; Bilska, A.G.; Bujalska, B.; Mazgajska, J.; Mazgajski, T.D.; Dabrowski, M.J. Absence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in urban populations of the common toad Bufo bufo in Warsaw, Central Poland. Pol. J. Ecol. 2025, 73, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazgajska, J.; Mazgajski, T.D. Low recapture rate in PIT marked urban populations of the common toad. Pol. J. Ecol. 2016, 64, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brede, E.G.; Rowe, G.; Trojanowski, J.; Beebee, T.J.C. Polymerase chain reaction primers for microsatellite loci in the common toad Bufo bufo. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2001, 1, 308–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recuero, E.; Canestrelli, D.; Vörös, J.; Szabó, K.; Poyarkov, N.A.; Arntzen, J.W.; Nascetti, G. Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 62, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jombart, T.; Devillard, S.; Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: A new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 2010, 11, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jombart, T. Adegenet: An R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, L.; Connor, T.R.; Sirén, J.; Aanensen, D.M.; Corander, J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1224–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falush, D.; Stephens, M.; Pritchard, J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003, 164, 1567–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hubisz, M.J.; Falush, D.; Stephens, M.; Pritchard, J.K. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 1322–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Earl, D.A.; VonHoldt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Keenan, K.; McGinnity, P.; Cross, T.F.; Crozier, W.W.; Prodöhl, P.A. divRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goudet, J. hierfstat, a Package for R to Compute and Test Hierarchical F-Statistics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2005, 5, 184–186. [Google Scholar]
- Do, C.; Waples, R.S.; Peel, D.; Macbeth, G.M.; Tillett, B.J.; Ovenden, J.R. NeEstimator v2: Re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2014, 14, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waples, R.S.; Do, C. LDNe: A program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luikart, G.; Allendorf, F.W.; Cornuet, J.M.; Sherwin, W.B. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cornuet, J.M.; Luikart, G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 1996, 144, 2001–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dramiński, M.; Rada-Iglesias, A.; Enroth, S.; Wadelius, C.; Koronacki, J.; Komorowski, H.J. Monte Carlo feature selection for supervised classification. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomasevic, N.; Cvetkovic, D.; Miaud, C.; Aleksic, I.; Crnobrnja-Isailovic, J. Interannual variation in life history traits between neighbouring populations of the widespread amphibian Bufo bufo. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 2008, 63, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dramiński, M.; Koronacki, J. rmcfs: An R package for Monte Carlo feature selection and interdependency discovery. J. Stat. Softw. 2018, 85, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolenda, K.; Kaczmarski, M.; Najbar, A.; Rozenblut-Kościsty, B.; Chmielewska, M.; Najbar, B. Road-killed toads as a non-invasive source to study age structure of spring migrating population. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2019, 65, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, M.A.; Green, D.M. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: Are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 2005, 28, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puky, M. Amphibian road kills: A global perspective. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation; Irwin, C.L., Garrett, P., McDermott, K.P., Eds.; Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2006; pp. 325–338. [Google Scholar]
- Tuncay, S.; Roth, S.; Bardakci, F.; Jehle, R. Genetic diversity of common toads (Bufo bufo) along the Norwegian coast: Disjunct distribution of locally dominant haplotypes. Herpetol. J. 2018, 28, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, R.; Jehle, R.; Wilkinson, J.W.; Maddock, S.T. Post-glacial colonization, latitude, isolation-by-distance, and local fragmentation have shaped the genetic diversity of common toads (Bufo bufo) across Britain. Evol. J. Linn. Soc. 2026, 5, kzag002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shine, R. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia 1979, 1979, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Sampling Sites | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | W | E | SE1 | SE2 | NW1 | NW2 | Statistic | p-Value | Test |
| Sample size | 18 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Na | 6.143 | 6.429 | 6.714 | 7.000 | 4.286 | 4.000 | 4.213 | 0.519 | KW |
| Ar | 4.713 | 4.813 | 4.924 | 5.230 | 4.046 | 3.720 | 1.571 | 0.905 | KW |
| Ho | 0.488 | 0.552 | 0.504 | 0.627 | 0.437 | 0.400 | 5.093 | 0.405 | KW |
| He | 0.574 | 0.649 | 0.612 | 0.614 | 0.474 | 0.497 | 0.570 | 0.724 | A |
| FIS | 0.179 | 0.174 | 0.202 | 0.005 | 0.138 | 0.246 | 0.870 | 0.514 | A |
| HWE | HD | HD | HD | HD | HD | HD | |||
| p-value | 0.0333 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.160 | 0.042 | 0.041 | |||
| No. Private Alleles | 0.714 | 0.571 | 0.429 | 1.000 | 0.429 | 0.143 | |||
| Ne LDNe | |||||||||
| Pcrit = 0.02 | −100.90 | 77.90 | 834.20 | −2387.80 | −26.30 | 36.50 | |||
| CI | 47.5–inf | 24.3–inf | 38.9–inf | 39.6–inf | 12.5–inf | 4.2–inf | |||
| Pcrit = 0.05 | −61.10 | 38.70 | −1606.60 | −165.10 | −26.30 | 36.50 | |||
| CI | 47.2–inf | 13.2–inf | 34.1–inf | 40.8–inf | 12.5–inf | 4.2–inf | |||
| Ne NeEstimator | |||||||||
| Pcrit = 0.02 | infinite | 67.60 | 738.80 | 481.10 | infinite | 36.50 | |||
| CI | 46–inf | 23.0–inf | 38.6–inf | 35.7–inf | 12.0–inf | 4.2–inf | |||
| Pcrit = 0.05 | infinite | 34.90 | infinite | infinite | infinite | 36.50 | |||
| CI | 45.6–inf | 12.6–inf | 33.9–inf | 36.7–inf | 12.0–inf | 4.2–inf | |||
| Bottleneck TPM 90% | 0.813 | 0.406 | 0.813 | 0.500 | 0.980 | 0.852 | |||
| SMM | 0.961 | 0.813 | 0.945 | 0.945 | 0.988 | 0.973 | |||
| Clusters | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | Statistic | p-Value | Test | |
| N | 30 | 32 | 35 | 0.170 | p > 0.10 | Chi | |
| Na | 8.286 | 7.571 | 8.857 | 0.373 | 0.830 | KW | |
| Ar | 8.139 | 7.205 | 8.249 | 0.423 | 0.809 | KW | |
| Ho | 0.570 | 0.440 | 0.520 | 0.420 | 0.665 | A | |
| He | 0.640 | 0.510 | 0.580 | 0.310 | 0.735 | A | |
| FIS | 0.111 | 0.134 | 0.101 | 0.030 | 0.975 | A | |
| HWE | HD | HD | HD | ||||
| p-value | 0.048 | 0.775 | 0.010 | ||||
| No. Private Alleles | 0.857 | 0.857 | 1.429 | ||||
| Ne LDNe | |||||||
| Pcrit = 0.02 | 0.02 | 233.400 | 134.400 | 116.600 | 19.450 | ||
| Pcrit = 0.05 | 0.05 | 233.800 | 30.000 | 47.700 | 55.640 | ||
| Ne NeEstimator | |||||||
| Pcrit = 0.02 | 0.02 | 204.400 | 123.200 | 113.300 | 13.480 | ||
| Pcrit = 0.05 | 0.05 | 203.300 | 28.300 | 46.600 | 79.170 | ||
| Bottleneck TPM 90% | 0.813 | 0.988 | 0.988 | ||||
| SMM | 0.973 | 0.988 | 0.996 | ||||
| Population | Number of Individuals | Number of Haplotypes (h) | Haplotype Diversity (Hd) | Average Number of Differences (K) | Nucleotide Diversity (Pi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 18 | 2 | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.00037 |
| E | 21 | 4 | 0.481 | 0.533 | 0.00067 |
| SE1 | 20 | 3 | 0.279 | 0.368 | 0.00046 |
| SE2 | 19 | 5 | 0.579 | 0.760 | 0.00095 |
| NW1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NW2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Sztencel-Jabłonka, A.; Bilska, A.G.; Bujalska, B.; Mazgajska, J.; Mazgajski, T.D.; Hrabovcová Sládkovičová, V.; Borowski, Z.; Tereba, A.; Dabrowski, M.J. Genetic Inertia in Urban Populations of the Common Toad (Bufo bufo): Evidence from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA. Animals 2026, 16, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16131983
Sztencel-Jabłonka A, Bilska AG, Bujalska B, Mazgajska J, Mazgajski TD, Hrabovcová Sládkovičová V, Borowski Z, Tereba A, Dabrowski MJ. Genetic Inertia in Urban Populations of the Common Toad (Bufo bufo): Evidence from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA. Animals. 2026; 16(13):1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16131983
Chicago/Turabian StyleSztencel-Jabłonka, Anna, Aleksandra G. Bilska, Barbara Bujalska, Joanna Mazgajska, Tomasz D. Mazgajski, Veronika Hrabovcová Sládkovičová, Zbigniew Borowski, Anna Tereba, and Michal J. Dabrowski. 2026. "Genetic Inertia in Urban Populations of the Common Toad (Bufo bufo): Evidence from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA" Animals 16, no. 13: 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16131983
APA StyleSztencel-Jabłonka, A., Bilska, A. G., Bujalska, B., Mazgajska, J., Mazgajski, T. D., Hrabovcová Sládkovičová, V., Borowski, Z., Tereba, A., & Dabrowski, M. J. (2026). Genetic Inertia in Urban Populations of the Common Toad (Bufo bufo): Evidence from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA. Animals, 16(13), 1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16131983

