1. Introduction
In veterinary medicine, the accurate and timely diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders in dogs is crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes [
1,
2,
3,
4]. Among the common clinical presentations, acute vomiting in dogs often necessitates a prompt investigation to identify the underlying cause and guide appropriate therapeutic interventions [
5].
Traditional diagnostic modalities for acute vomiting in dogs—physical examination, laboratory diagnostics, radiography, and ultrasonography—offer crucial insights. However, their sensitivity may be inadequate for detecting subtle or early-stage abnormalities in the GI tract [
1,
5,
6,
7,
8].
Over the past few decades, the field of veterinary medicine has seen significant advancements in endoscopic techniques [
9]. Conventional endoscopy, which involves the insertion of a flexible or rigid endoscope into the gastrointestinal tract, has been widely utilized for diagnosing gastrointestinal disorders and has provided valuable insights into the gastrointestinal tract in small animals [
9,
10]. However, the limitations of conventional endoscopy, such as incomplete visualization of the entire gastrointestinal tract and the requirement for sedation or general anesthesia, have prompted the exploration of alternative approaches to enhance its diagnostic capabilities.
In recent years, advancements in medical imaging technology have led to the emergence of a novel diagnostic method known as video capsule endoscopy, which offers a non-invasive and comprehensive approach for examining the gastrointestinal system [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15].
Importantly, RT-VCE has emerged as a significant advancement in both human and veterinary endoscopy, allowing for instantaneous visualization of the gastrointestinal mucosa spanning from the esophagus to the rectum [
11,
14]. This technology involves a wireless capsule equipped with a miniature camera that transmits images to an external receiver unit worn by the patient. As the capsule traverses the gastrointestinal tract, it captures high-resolution images, providing a detailed examination of the mucosal surfaces and enabling the identification of abnormalities. Unlike conventional endoscopy, RT-VCE eliminates the need for anesthesia or sedation, reduces potential risks, and increases patient comfort [
11,
14].
Despite these advantages and its success in human gastroenterology, the potential of RT-VCE in veterinary practice, particularly for diagnosing acute vomiting in dogs, has not been widely adopted or investigated for this indication in veterinary medicine. The application of RT-VCE in an emergency veterinary setting could hold the key to a more comprehensive understanding of the canine GI tract, enabling the identification of both surgical and nonsurgical gastric lesions with increased sensitivity.
This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of RT-VCE in identifying surgical or nonsurgical gastric lesions in dogs that presented with acute vomiting. Additionally, this study assessed the patient acceptance and the ability of clinicians to make informed decisions based on the data obtained from RT-VCEs. By evaluating the performance of this innovative diagnostic modality, we can expand our understanding of its potential applications in emergency veterinary settings and contribute to the advancement of diagnostic techniques in veterinary clinics.
2. Case Description
This case study included 11 client-owned dogs (mean age 6.2 ± 4.7 years, mean weight 21.14 ± 10.84 kg), as outlined in
Table 1. These subjects presented as emergency cases at emergency animal medical centers due to the recent onset of acute vomiting within a few days prior to admission. Despite an in-depth clinical history, physical examination, blood tests, and basic thoracic and abdominal radiographic evaluations, accurately determining the underlying etiology of the acute vomiting remained challenging.
Given the reluctance of clients for invasive diagnostic methods and time-consuming procedures, we recommended capsule endoscopy as a less invasive and anesthesia-free alternative for diagnostic evaluation. After obtaining informed consent from the owners, we proceeded with the RT-VCE examination using the MiroCam
® (MC1200, Intromedic, Seoul, Republic of Koea) system (
Figure 1A).
Prior to the capsule endoscopy, the dogs were administered an antiemetic medication (maropitant citrate, 1 mg/kg, subcutaneously). As the dogs presented with acute vomiting, an antiemetic was administered prior to the capsule endoscopy to reduce the likelihood of vomiting during the procedure, which could interfere with the capsule passage or result in premature expulsion. Maropitant citrate was selected due to its well-established antiemetic efficacy, favorable safety profile, and rapid onset of action in canine patients. A notable advantage of the MiroCam® system is its ability to monitor video images on an external screen in real time.
The RT-VCE images were reviewed and interpreted by veterinarians directly from a real-time display (
Figure 1B). All procedures that involved dogs complied with the guidelines approved by the IACUC of Gyeongsang National University (GNU-240325-D0067).
Among the 11 dogs included in this study, seven were spayed females and four were castrated males. The median age of the dogs was 6.2 years, which ranged from 0.5 to 14 years. Six dogs were older than 6 years of age. The median weight was 21.82 kg, with a range of 5.5 to 37.64 kg. This study included diverse breeds, such as a Boston Terrier and a Golden Retriever. The specific breeds included a Pitbull Terrier (two dogs), Labrador Retriever, Golden Retriever, Golden Doodle, Shepherd Mix, Boxer, Yorkshire Terrier Mix, Shih Tzu, Wheaten Terrier, and Boston Terrier. All 11 dogs presented with symptoms of acute vomiting, with two instances of hematemesis and one occurrence of concurrent diarrhea. The detailed data are presented in
Table 1.
All the dogs showed no abnormal findings related to acute vomiting in their blood test results and thoracic radiographs. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed in three of the eleven dogs, but the findings were either non-specific or inconclusive regarding the gastric contents. Although ultrasound is clearly a useful modality for identifying gastric foreign bodies or other possible causes of vomiting, it was not performed in all cases due to various limitations, such as the cost considerations or owner refusal. Abdominal radiographs showed no specific findings in most cases. In some dogs, radiopaque shadows within the stomach suggested possible foreign bodies; however, accurate determination was difficult. One dog presented with radiographic findings suggestive of a round-shaped foreign body within the stomach, suspected to be a ball.
The post-RT-VCE examination revealed the etiology of the acute vomiting in all 11 dogs. There was no discrepancy in the diagnoses between the veterinarians, and the time to reach a medical decision ranged from 1 to 48 min (mean 21.82 ± 15.26 min). Five dogs were diagnosed with gastric foreign bodies. Five dogs were diagnosed with gastritis, and one dog was diagnosed with a gastric ulcer or erosion (
Figure 2). The five dogs diagnosed with acute vomiting secondary to gastric foreign bodies underwent surgical removal of the object (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4).
The remaining six dogs diagnosed with gastritis received medical management, including fluid therapy, the administration of proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole; 1 mg/kg PO BID), and dietary modifications (hypoallergenic diet). None of the dogs vomited from the capsule endoscopes after the procedure and no other adverse effects were observed. The RT-VCE diagnostic-related data are summarized in
Table 2.
3. Discussion
The present study demonstrated that RT-VCE is a promising method for the diagnostic assessment of acute vomiting in dogs. Notably, this study revealed that RT-VCE provided a swift and efficient means of identifying both surgical and nonsurgical gastric lesions, potentially offering a rapid route for decision-making in an emergency veterinary setting.
Gastric foreign bodies, gastritis, and gastric ulceration are common causes of acute vomiting in dogs [
5,
6,
8]. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can result in serious consequences, including progression to more severe disease states, complications, or even death [
2,
3,
4,
5]. Traditional diagnostic modalities, such as a physical examination, laboratory diagnostics, radiography, and ultrasonography, play crucial roles in the diagnostic workup of acute vomiting in dogs [
5,
6,
8]. Nevertheless, these approaches may have limitations in their ability to detect subtle or early-stage abnormalities within the GI tract [
5,
6,
7,
16]. In this study, abdominal ultrasonography could have provided additional diagnostic information in patients suspected of having gastric foreign bodies; however, precise comparisons were difficult because ultrasonography was not performed in all patients included in this case study.
Although valuable, conventional endoscopy is limited by its inability to visualize the entire gastrointestinal tract and the need for sedation or general anesthesia [
9,
10]. RT-VCE circumvents these limitations by offering a noninvasive, anesthesia-free approach that provides a comprehensive view of the GI mucosa from the esophagus to the rectum.
Our study highlighted several advantages of RT-VCE for evaluating acute vomiting in dogs. First, RT-VCE enables the real-time visualization of the GI mucosa, supporting prompt decision-making in emergency situations. In our study, the time to reach a medical decision ranged from 1 to 48 min, with a mean time of 21.82 ± 15.26 min. This rapid diagnostic process is invaluable in an emergency setting, where timely intervention can substantially improve patient outcomes. This ability to deliver rapid diagnostic insights not only facilitates early intervention but also streamlines triage and clinical prioritization in emergency veterinary care. Especially in patients with unstable conditions, minimizing the time to decision-making can be critical in preventing clinical deterioration.
Second, RT-VCE offers excellent image quality, allowing for the identification of both surgical and non-surgical gastric lesions. In our study, five dogs were diagnosed with gastric foreign bodies that required surgical intervention for removal. The high-resolution images provided by RT-VCE facilitated the identification of foreign objects, which enabled timely surgical intervention. Additionally, RT-VCE allowed for the diagnosis of gastritis and gastric ulceration. Furthermore, in cases of complete obstruction not caused by a foreign body, the capsule may experience significant delays in excretion or may not pass naturally. Nevertheless, one of the notable advantages of RT-VCE is that it enables real-time, anesthesia-free visualization of the obstructed region, providing critical information about the location, shape, and likely etiology of the obstruction. This feature can guide clinical decision-making and help identify the most appropriate surgical approach, as the capsule’s point of retention typically corresponds to the obstructive lesion. Although the diagnostic value of RT-VCE may be limited when a foreign body is clearly identified on abdominal radiography, as seen in case 3, this modality still offers important clinical benefits. RT-VCE allows for direct visualization of the gastric mucosa and any concurrent inflammatory lesions prior to anesthesia or surgical intervention. Additionally, it helps evaluate the type and condition of the foreign object, supporting clinicians in determining whether endoscopic removal is feasible or whether surgical intervention is more appropriate.
Third, RT-VCE demonstrated good patient acceptance and tolerability. None of the dogs in this study vomited the capsule endoscope after the procedure, and no adverse effects were observed. Because RT-VCE eliminates the need for anesthesia or sedation, it reduces the risks associated with these interventions, thereby enhancing patient safety and comfort.
The unanimous interpretive agreement between the two veterinary clinicians in our study suggests that the RT-VCE images are reliable and interpretable, aiding in diagnostic consistency. This interpretive agreement is vital in emergency settings, where discrepancies in diagnoses can lead to delays in treatment or inappropriate interventions.
The limitations of this study include the small sample size, and the lack of comparative analysis with conventional endoscopy and abdominal ultrasound. Additionally, long-term outcomes of the diagnosed cases were not assessed in this study. Future studies with larger sample sizes, comparative analyses, and long-term follow-up assessments are required to establish the clinical significance and utility of RT-VCE in the diagnostic workup for acute vomiting in dogs.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, RT-VCE is a valuable diagnostic method for the evaluation of acute vomiting in dogs. This study suggests that RT-VCE could provide a fast, accurate, and well-tolerated method for diagnosing and managing acute gastric conditions in dogs. Its ability to provide real-time, high-quality images of the GI mucosa enabled rapid identification of both surgical and nonsurgical gastric lesions, which supported prompt decision-making in an emergency veterinary setting. These findings could revolutionize the standard practice of veterinary medicine and improve patient outcomes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; methodology, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; software, H.J.; validation, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; formal analysis, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; investigation, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; resources, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; data curation, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; visualization, H.J., Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; supervision, Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; project administration, Y.J.K. and D.-I.J.; funding acquisition, Y.J.K. and D.-I.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Western University of Health Sciences (Pomona, CA, USA), Gyeongsang National University (Jinju, Republic of Korea), and Intromedic Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Republic of Korea).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Ethical review and approval were not required for this animal study as we report a case study from a veterinary medical teaching hospital. We obtained the consent of both the owners and veterinarians, who confirmed that the dogs (who underwent the listed examinations, including the capsule endoscopy) were treated not for experimental purposes but for medical reasons.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from the owners of the animals in this study.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions found in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the veterinary medical staff at the Gyeongsang National University Animal Medical Center (GAMC) for their cooperation throughout this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Hayes, G. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies in dogs and cats: A retrospective study of 208 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2009, 50, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Battisti, A.; Toscano, M.J.; Formaggini, L. Gastric foreign body as a risk factor for gastric dilatation and volvulus in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 241, 1190–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hobday, M.M.; Pachtinger, G.E.; Drobatz, K.J.; Syring, R.S. Linear versus non-linear gastrointestinal foreign bodies in 499 dogs: Clinical presentation, management and short-term outcome. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2014, 55, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maxwell, E.A.; Dugat, D.R.; Waltenburg, M.; Upchurch, D.; Soto-Elias, P.; Duffy, D.J.; Spector, D.; Petrovsky, B.; Payton, M. Outcomes of dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgical treatment for gastrointestinal foreign body obstruction: A retrospective study by the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery. Vet. Surg. 2021, 50, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- King, L.G.; Donaldson, M.T. Acute vomiting. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1994, 24, 1189–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Webb, C.; Twedt, D.C. Canine gastritis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2003, 33, 969–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tyrrell, D.; Beck, C. Survey of the use of radiography vs. ultrasonography in the investigation of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in small animals. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2006, 47, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freiche, V.; German, A.J. Digestive diseases in brachycephalic dogs. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2021, 51, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Happé, R.P. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the dog. Vet. Q. 1985, 7, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zoran, D.L. Gastroduodenoscopy in the dog and cat. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2001, 31, 631–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakamura, M.; Ohmiya, N.; Takenaka, H.; Morishima, K.; Ishihara, M.; Miyahara, R.; Ando, T.; Watanabe, O.; Kawashima, H.; Itoh, A.; et al. Real-time viewing of video capsule endoscopy for ongoing mid GI bleeding. Hepatogastroenterology 2012, 59, 2533–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davignon, D.L.; Lee, A.C.; Johnston, A.N.; Bowman, D.D.; Simpson, K.W. Evaluation of capsule endoscopy to detect mucosal lesions associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2016, 57, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Enns, R.A.; Hookey, L.; Armstrong, D.; Bernstein, C.N.; Heitman, S.J.; Teshima, C.; Leontiadis, G.I.; Tse, F.; Sadowski, D. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 497–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nam, S.J.; Lee, H.S.; Lim, Y.J. Evaluation of gastric disease with capsule endoscopy. Clin. Endosc. 2018, 51, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mabry, K.; Hill, T.; Marks, S.L.; Hardy, B.T. Use of video capsule endoscopy to identify gastrointestinal lesions in dogs with microcytosis or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hara, A.K.; Leighton, J.A.; Sharma, V.K.; Heigh, R.I.; Fleischer, D.E. Imaging of small bowel disease: Comparison of capsule endoscopy, standard endoscopy, barium examination, and CT. RadioGraphics 2005, 25, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).