Next Article in Journal
Zoonotic Bacteria and Vector-Borne Protozoa in Troglophilus Bat Colonies in Sicily (Southern Italy): A Biomolecular Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Pet Dog Choice in Hong Kong and Mainland China: Exploring Owners’ Motivations, Behaviours, and Perceptions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants’ Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors

by
Konstantinos V. Arsenopoulos
1,*,
Athanasios I. Gelasakis
2 and
Elias Papadopoulos
3
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nicosia, Engomi, 2414 Nicosia, Cyprus
2
Laboratory of Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens (AUA), Iera Odos 75 Str., 11855 Athens, Greece
3
Laboratory of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(4), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040487
Submission received: 9 January 2025 / Revised: 4 February 2025 / Accepted: 7 February 2025 / Published: 9 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Small Ruminants)

Simple Summary

This study investigated the prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infections in dairy sheep and goats in Greece and evaluated host-related risk factors. A total of 1004 abomasa were examined and a structured questionnaire collected farm and animal data. Molecular identification of Haemonchus spp. revealed a 37.2% prevalence of mono-species H. contortus infections. In sheep, key preventive factors included anthelmintic treatments, young age, and intensive management system. In goats, intensive management, anthelmintic treatments, high-altitude farms, and spring/summer seasons were significant in reducing infection risk.

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to (i) determine the prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infections in dairy sheep and goats in continental and insular Greece, based on an abattoir survey, and (ii) to evaluate potential host-related risk factors including the age and sex, as well as the altitude, the management system, the co-existence of goats and sheep, the season, and the anthelmintic treatment, on the occurrence of haemonchosis. Methods: In total, 1004 abomasa of small ruminants were examined to evaluate the prevalence of Haemonchus spp. Moreover, a structured questionnaire was used to obtain relevant information regarding animal and farm characteristics. Haemonchus-like helminths were collected from the abomasa and used for the molecular species identification; a fragment of 321 base pairs of the internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence of nuclear DNA was amplified. Results: The prevalence of mono-species H. contortus infection of small ruminants was 37.2%. For sheep, a multivariable analysis revealed the anthelmintic treatment (treatment with pro/benzimidazoles), the age (lambs under 2 months old), and the management system (intensive management system) as significant factors for preventing H. contortus infection. Likewise, the management system (intensive management system), the anthelmintic treatment (treatment with macrocyclic lactones and their combination with pro/benzimidazoles), the altitude of the farms (farms located over 300 m above sea level), and the season (spring and summer) were significant risk factors in preventing H. contortus infection in goats. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted management practices and region-specific veterinary protocols to effectively reduce parasitic burdens.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) threaten the sustainability of ruminant livestock production on farms worldwide [1,2]. Epizootiological studies have revealed their presence among domestic ruminants in central and northern European countries [3,4,5], as well as in Mediterranean countries [6,7,8], including Greece [9,10]. Haemonchus spp. are listed among the most commonly detected GIN [11,12] with severe implications on ruminant production, including heavy losses in terms of milk and meat production (quantitatively and qualitatively), reduced offspring growth, impaired health, welfare, nutritional status, inefficient reproduction, and increased costs for prevention and treatment, as well as predisposition to other diseases [12,13,14].
In Greece, GIN infections are particularly widespread among small ruminants [9,10], with several studies reporting Teladorsagia spp. along with Haemonchus spp. to be the most prevalent parasites in dairy sheep and goats [15,16]. This is mainly attributed to the predominant semi-intensive farming system, where the overall feeding scheme includes a combination of grazing in natural pasturelands and the supplementary feeding of concentrates and roughages, year-round [17]. Seasonal variations play a crucial role, as environmental conditions during hot and humid months favor the development and survival of infective larvae. Host factors, such as age and sex, contribute to susceptibility, with young female animals, particularly during lactation, being more affected. Additionally, altitude influences parasite transmission, as lowland regions typically present higher parasite burdens than high-altitude areas. The co-existence of sheep and goats may further exacerbate transmission dynamics, while the widespread emergence of anthelmintic resistance complicates effective control measures [10,14].
Despite the documented significance of haemonchosis for the dairy small ruminant sector in Greece, there is a scarcity of updated epizootiological data at a countrywide level. Greek islands play a significant role in the epizootiology of Haemonchus contortus (Rudolphi, 1803), which can be justified based on several ecological, geographical, and livestock management factors. Moreover, all of the available studies were based on a coprological examination by microscopy of L3 larvae for the diagnosis of infections, which is less sensitive for identifying nematodes at the species level.
Therefore, the objectives of the present study were (a) to determine the prevalence of haemonchosis in dairy sheep and goats, based on the post-mortem examination in abattoirs of both continental and insular Greece, and (b) to link it with potential host-related traits such as the age and the sex, and farm-related traits such as the altitude of the farm, the farming system, the co-existence of goats and sheep in the same flock, the season, and the type of anthelmintic treatment used on the occurrence of haemonchosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design—Methodology

An extensive countrywide cross-sectional study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, to determine the epizootiology of haemonchosis in small ruminants in Greece. This study was based on the post-mortem examination of sheep and goats’ abomasa collected from 67 abattoirs across the country (i.e., 48 from continental and 19 from insular country) (Figure 1). Both sheep’s and goats’ abomasa were collected from each abattoir visited around Greece.
In total, 1004 abomasa collected from 573 (57.1%) sheep and 431 (42.9%) goats, originating from 306 and 300 flocks, respectively, were examined for the presence of the nematode H. contortus.

2.2. Collection and Post-Mortem Examination of Sheep’s and Goats’ Abomasa from Abattoirs

During the evisceration of the gastrointestinal tract, each abomasum was separated, opened with scissors, and its content removed; then, it was individually placed in isothermal plastic bags within 30 min post-evisceration to be transported under refrigeration (+4 °C) to the Laboratory of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases. Upon arrival at the laboratory, a detailed examination of the mucosa of the abomasum was performed to detect adult Haemonchus helminths. A positive result for Haemonchus spp. infection was defined by the presence of, at least, one adult nematode parasite on the mucosa of the abomasum.

2.3. Data Collection

Along with the collection of abomasa from the abattoirs, relevant data (Table 1) were also collected with regard to the location of the abattoirs and the slaughter date, as well as the age and species of the slaughtered animal, the farming system, the co-existence of goats and sheep within the flock of origin, the anthelmintic treatment protocol, and the farm’s altitude. Farms were classified according to (i) the altitude (plain farms < 300 m and semi-mountainous or mountainous farms > 300 m), (ii) the farming system (grazing or zero-grazing), (iii) the application of anthelmintic treatment (a. pro/benzimidazoles, b. macrocyclic lactones, c. combined use of pro/benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones, and d. no anthelmintic treatment), and (iv) the co-existence of sheep and goats. Animals were grouped according to their species (sheep or goat), age-class (<2 months old, >2 to 15 months old, and >15 months old) and sex (male or female).

2.4. Data Handling—Statistical Analyses

Prevalence values and their 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%) were estimated using the Epitools (https://epitools.ausvet.com.au/ciproportion, accessed on 20 September 2024) and the Wilson score interval method. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the contribution of potential risk factors on the Haemonchus spp. infection status in sheep and goats. Initially, a full factorial model was built and potential interactions were tested to check for significant confounders. No significant effects of these interactions were found; hence, a ‘main-effects’ model was used instead. The aforementioned risk factors included co-existence of other ruminant species, type of anthelmintic treatment, age, sex, farm altitude, farming system, and season, as described in Equation (1):
Y = α + β1Χ1 + β2Χ2 + β3Χ3 + β4Χ4 + β5Χ5 + β6Χ6 + β7Χ7
where Y = the probability of a small ruminant (sheep and goats were considered separately) being positive for Haemonchus spp., β1 to β7 are the regression coefficients of the coexistence of other ruminant species (X1, 2 levels: 0 = no other ruminant species, and 1 = at least one co-existent ruminant species), type of anthelmintic treatment (X2, 4 levels: 0 = pro/benzimidazoles, 1 = macrocyclic lactones, 2 = combination of pro/benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones, and 4 = no treatment), age class (X3, 3 levels: 0 ≤ 2 months 1 = 2 to 15 months, and 3 ≥ 15 months), sex (X4, 2 levels: 0 = male, and 1 = female), farm altitude (X5, 2 levels: 0 ≤ 300 m above sea level, and 1 ≥ 300 m above sea level), farming system (X6, 2 levels: 0 = semi-intensive, and 1 = intensive), and season (X7, 4 levels: 0 = spring, 1 = summer, 2 = autumn, and 3 = winter), respectively.
The Wald χ2 statistic of their regression coefficients (βs) was used to test the statistical significance of individual predictors. The Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test, the Cox and Snell R2, and the Nagelkerke R2 indices were used to assess the goodness-of-fit for each individual model. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level.

2.5. Molecular Identification of Haemonchus contortus

All adult helminths, resembling Haemonchus spp., were collected from the abomasum of each animal and preserved in vials containing 99% ethanol, even though our primary goal was to obtain samples for molecular analysis rather than to assess the parasitic burden. For DNA extraction, 5595 adult H. contortus (15 helminths per infected abomasum) were included in our molecular approach. In the case where less than 15 adult parasites were detected in an abomasum, the respective number was replaced from H. contortus derived from farms that raised both sheep and goats. Then, the head of each helminth was carefully dissected at the cervical papillae, excluding the uterus and eggs. Genomic DNA was extracted following the protocol by Hillis et al. [18]. A 321 base pair fragment of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of nuclear DNA (Figure 2) was amplified for species identification, using the primers NC1-forward: 5′-ACGTCTGGTTCAGGGTTGTT-3′ and NC2-reverse: 5′-TTAGTTTCTTTTCCTCCGCT-3′ described by Arsenopoulos et al. [19] and synthesized by Eurofins Genomics GmbH (Ebersberg, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Haemonchus contortus Infection

The overall prevalence of H. contortus infections in the studied small ruminants was 37.2% (373/1004), with the infection rates for sheep and goats being 41.0% (235/573) and 32.0% (138/431), respectively. Μore details are presented in Table 2.

3.2. Molecular Identification of Haemonchus spp.

Helminths, resembling Haemonchus spp., were detected on the abomasum of all infected sheep and goats. The Blast analysis of sequences, obtained after molecular assessment of each helminth, showed a high nucleotide identity ranging from 99.9% to 100.0% with those of H. contortus available in the GenBank.

3.3. Descriptive Results

Table 3 summarizes the prevalence of H. contortus infections in sheep and goats for each level of the studied host- and environment-related risk factors. One-third of the studied sheep and goats were reared in mixed-species flocks. More than half of the animals received anthelmintic treatment with pro/benzimidazoles compared to other antiparasitic options, while approximately 20% of the animals received no anthelmintic treatment. Approximately 40% of goat kids < 2 months old were found parasitized by adult H. contortus. A lower percentage of dairy small ruminants were infected with H. contortus at altitudes > 300 m above sea level. Intensively managed (no grazing) sheep (17.8%) and goats (5.8%) suffered from haemonchosis. Female animals were infected with Haemonchus helminths at a higher percentage compared to male ones. Finally, a noteworthy percentage of sheep (23.4%) and goats’ (18.8%) abomasa were parasitized with adult H. contortus during winter.

3.4. Risk Factors of Sheep Infected by Haemonchus contortus

Table 4 summarizes the effects of the studied risk factors on the likelihood of H. contortus infections in sheep. Sheep treated with pro/benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, or a combination of the two were 9.1 (95% CI: 4.2 to 20.0, p < 0.001), 7.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 16.7, p < 0.001), and 8.3 (95% CI: 3.6 to 20, p < 0.001) times, respectively, less likely to be infected by H. contortus compared to non-treated ones. Likewise, <2-month-old lambs were 5.0 times less likely to be infected by H. contortus compared to >15-month-old sheep (95% CI: 2.9 to 8.3, p < 0.001). The likelihood of H. contortus infection was increased by 2.7 times in semi-intensively reared sheep compared to the intensively reared ones (95% CI 1.7 to 4.3, p < 0.05).
On the contrary, the co-existence of sheep and goats, the farm altitude, the sex of the slaughtered animals and the season of sampling did not have any significant (p > 0.05) effects on the likelihood of H. contortus infection in the studied animals.

3.5. Risk Factors of Goats Infected by Haemonchus contortus

Table 5 summarizes the effects of the studied risk factors on the likelihood of H. contortus infections in goats. Goats treated with pro/benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, and a combination of the two were ca. 50 (95% CI: 10 to 250, p < 0.001), 100 (95% CI: 14 to 500, p < 0.001), and 100 (95% CI: 14 to 333, p < 0.001) times, respectively, less likely to be infected by H. contortus compared to non-treated ones. Goats reared at farms located at <300 m a.s.l. were ca. 2.6 times more likely to be infected by H. contortus compared to the ones at farms located at >300 m a.s.l. (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.8, p < 0.01). The likelihood of H. contortus infection was increased by 3.3 times in semi-intensively reared goats compared to the intensively reared ones (95% CI: 1.1 to 9.6, p < 0.05). Moreover, a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood of a goat to be found positive for H. contortus infection was observed in spring (by ca. 2.6 times, 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.3 times, p < 0.01) and summer (by ca. 2.6 times, 95% CI: 1.2 to 5.6 times, p < 0.05) compared to winter.
The co-existence of goats and sheep, age, and sex of the studied animals had no significant (p > 0.05) effects on the likelihood of H. contortus infections in goats.

4. Discussion

This is the first countrywide abattoir survey for the investigation of H. contortus infections in dairy small ruminants in Greece, which includes not only the continental but also the insular country, to the best of our knowledge. The Greek islands, due to their unique climate, geographic isolation, and traditional livestock management practices offer valuable conditions for studying the epizootiology of H. contortus. It is also the first time that host- and farm-related risk factors (i.e., age, sex, farm location altitude, farming system, the co-existence of sheep and goats in the same flock, season, and the anthelmintic treatment used) were assessed as potential risk factors of the H. contortus infections.
Epizootiological studies on haemonchosis are mainly focused on sequential observations of the worm burdens in grazing ruminants, searching for direct relationships between nematode infections and environmental factors. These types of studies are based on three different approaches [20] including (1) the use of animals—tracers, which graze on pasturelands contaminated with worm eggs at specific time-points, (2) worm counts from ruminants naturally infected and continuously challenged by nematodes, and (3) abattoir surveys [20], which is also the case in our study.
Abattoir surveys allow the direct estimation of Haemonchus spp. from grazing animals, providing precise data on the actual parasitic burden, while they can identify different life stages of this parasite, providing more comprehensive data on the life cycle and population dynamics of Haemonchus spp. On the contrary, studies based exclusively on faecal worm egg counts (FWECs) are not necessarily indicative of the real parasitic burden, which can be influenced by factors such as the egg production rates and faecal consistency. Another advantage of abattoir surveys is the detection of immature stages of parasites that have not yet started producing eggs, offering insights into early infection stages that FWECs cannot capture. Moreover, abattoir surveys provide direct evidence of infection, leading to more accurate estimates of the prevalence and intensity of infection, and can be integrated with other health surveillance activities conducted at slaughterhouses, such as monitoring for other diseases and contaminants, providing a holistic view of animal’s health. While abattoir surveys may have higher initial costs, they can be more cost-effective in the long run due to the large volume of data collected from animals already being processed for meat production. This can reduce the need for extensive on-farm sampling and testing [20].
In general, prospective epizootiological studies have provided a good understanding of the seasonal effects of H. contortus burdens for a range of environments, to set the basis for the effective application of control programmes on a case-specific basis [21]. However, in most of these studies only a small number of nematode species have been recognized and interspecies competitive effects, which may affect the worm numbers recovered, have not been sufficiently taken into consideration [20]. Moreover, several other epizootiological studies have not elucidated the seasonal pattern of H. contortus infections during the year, with the frequency and reliability of observations greatly varying. To overcome the aforementioned disadvantages, our study design included exclusively adult H. contortus collected from ruminants’ abomasum by the same researcher (K.V.A.) within a two-year period.
Haemonchus contortus is one of the two most pathogenic parasites (along with Teladorsagia circumcincta, Stadelmann, 1894) in the small ruminant industry, infecting the epithelium of abomasum [22]. It causes severe anaemia due to its blood-sucking activity, leading to significant monetary losses [23]. The investigation of the spatio-temporal spreading of haemonchosis and the update of its epizootiology are urgent matters for its sustainable control, considering, also, the constantly increasing anthelmintic resistance of H. contortus.
In Greece, the epizootiology of haemonchosis in sheep and goats has been reported by previous relevant studies, which were mainly based on the enumeration of L3 larvae in coprocultures [9,15,24,25,26]. According to the aforementioned data, haemonchosis in dairy small ruminants in Greece ranged from 22.4 to 32.0%. In our abattoir survey, the infection rate ranged from 32.0% for goats to 41.0% for sheep. The detection of mono-species H. contortus infection in Greek territory, which was recorded in our abattoir survey, has been previously confirmed by Arsenopoulos et al. [19]. Comparing the results of our study with past studies, it is noteworthy that there seems to be a progressive increase in the infection rate, possibly attributable to the observed anthelmintic resistance of strains (e.g., against pro/benzimidazoles) [27] and the climate change pattern (tropical–subtropical parasite), which also seems to be linked with the increased spatio-temporal distribution of the parasite [28,29].
Indeed, the extensive H. contortus distribution and the increased prevalence values in small ruminants, since the mid-2010s, suggest a wider geographical range where H. contortus is currently endemic, particularly in colder temperate climates of the northern hemisphere. Under these climatic conditions, the increased prevalence of haemonchosis has been linked to the increasing temperatures deriving from long-term climate changes [27,30,31,32].
In our study, a statistical analysis evaluated the effectiveness of pro/benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, and their combination against H. contortus infection. More precisely, sheep treated with pro/benzimidazoles had the lowest likelihood to be infected by H. contortus, when compared to non-treated ones. Indeed, albendazole remains the most widely used benzimidazole in Greece, registered for per os administration (i.e., tablets or oral suspension), expressing a short-term efficacy against most internal parasites (i.e., nematodes, tapeworms, and liver flukes), shorter milk withdrawal period, and lower cost, compared to macrocyclic lactones [33]. On the other hand, macrocyclic lactones have a narrower antiparasitic spectrum against internal parasites, a longer milk withdrawal period (i.e., ivermectin), and a higher cost, when compared to pro/benzimidazoles. Eprinomectin, which is a macrocyclic lactone registered to overcome these limitations, combines a wide spectrum antiparasitic activity against GINs, lungworms, and some ectoparasites with a zero-day milk withdrawal period [25,26]. In our study, approximately 8% of the participated farms used eprinomectin in their applied antiparasitic protocols, with an increasing trend of its use.
We anticipated a reduced efficacy of pro/benzimidazoles against H. contortus since our previous field studies indicated that the extensive use of pro/benzimidazoles has enhanced the development of benzimidazole-resistant GINs, posing an emerging threat for the Greek sheep- and goat-farming sector [16,27]. These two latter studies examined adult female H. contortus, collected from both sheep and goats, to detect SNPs in the amino acid at position 200 of the gene encoding isotype-1 of β-tubulin; according to their findings, in the majority of the studied worms, homozygous alleles provoking benzimidazole resistance (i.e., Tyr/Tyr) were detected, while the homozygous alleles (TTC/TTC) at the same position and gene which encodes the susceptible amino acids Phe/Phe have not been detected [16,27]. This alarming situation has been further confirmed in many countries with a developed ruminant sector, compromising the efficacy of pro/benzimidazoles against GINs [34,35,36,37]. However, new information published by Babjak et al. [38] reported that the efficacy of pro/benzimidazoles in a benzimidazole-resistant population of H. contortus in both sheep and goats could be affected by the different proportion of homozygous- and heterozygous-resistant alleles, in total, and not exclusively based on the benzimidazole resistance associated with the isotype-1 β-tubulin gene codon 200 allele, justifying the results of the present study.
Contrary to sheep, the treatment with macrocyclic lactones in goats was followed by the lowest likelihood of H. contortus infection, in comparison with the non-treated ones. This is mainly attributed to differences in the gastrointestinal physiology of goats compared to sheep. Goats tend to have a faster ruminal turnover rate [39], which permit us to assume that the drugs administered via the oral route (i.e., pro/benzimidazoles) pass through the digestive system more quickly, compared to injectable or pour-on ones (i.e., macrocyclic lactones), explaining the better anthelmintic outcome against H. contortus in goats, in the present study. Moreover, the pour-on application of macrocyclic lactones such as eprinomectin in sheep is not an easy task in practice because it requires the partial removal of the fleece and direct contact of the applicator bottle spout on the skin over the backline [26]. This task is easier on the haircoat of the goats, possibly leading to a better absorption of the drug and, therefore, a better anthelmintic outcome.
It is noteworthy that newly published studies concluded that a similar or the same efficacy of pro/benzimidazoles is expected when mono-infection with H. contortus is suspected and when the same dose of benzimidazole is applied in both sheep and goats, despite their interspecific differences. This means that an underdosing should not be considered when goats are predominantly infected with H. contortus and are treated with an albendazole dose at 5 mg/kg of body weight (same as recommended for sheep), since the estimation of the representation of the resistant and susceptible parasites in the population is likely accurate [38].
The overall farming system and, particularly, grazing activity and practices contribute to the ruminants’ exposure to the L3 larvae of H. contortus. In Greece, two types of farming systems prevail, the intensive and the semi-intensive one [40]. In semi-intensive systems, feeding regimes are characterized by a combination of year-round grazing on pasturelands, usually close to the farm, and the supplementary feeding of concentrates and forages [17]. Under these systems, animals are often exposed to GINs. On the contrary, in intensive farming systems, sheep and goats remain permanently housed, with access (in some cases) to fenced yards; therefore, they have a lower exposure to GINs and, subsequently, H. contortus when reared under these systems [41]. This is consistent with our findings that revealed a higher likelihood of infection with H. contortus for sheep and goats living under semi-intensive systems compared to those living under intensive ones.
Host susceptibility/resistance to haemonchosis is known to be associated with the animal’s age [42]. Adult animals are more resistant to haemonchosis compared to young animals, due to a more efficient immune system response [42,43]. However, in our study, adult sheep were more likely to be infected with H. contortus compared to lambs. This is consistent with the fact that, in the studied farms, grazing was practiced exclusively in adult animals while lambs remained housed and, therefore, were not directly exposed to GIN.
Farm altitude has been reported as a potential risk factor for haemonchosis [44]. In that case, the differences between lowlands and highlands regarding the pedoclimatic conditions and particularly the ambient temperature seem to be related to the increased parasitic burden in lowlands, as it has been found that the development of the free larval stages of H. contortus requires high ambient temperatures [33]. This is in agreement with the findings of our study, where farms located at lowlands demonstrated a higher risk of haemonchosis. Another possible explanation for the aforementioned result is the different types of pasturelands and vegetation thereof in lowland and highland areas, which is associated with either the grazing or browsing activities demonstrated according to it; grazing activity facilitates the exposure of animals to H. contortus infections, contrary to browsing activity.
Haemonchus contortus is probably the most extensively studied nematode in small ruminants, due to its spreading, its importance, and its relevance with ecological factors that determine the viability of the eggs and its larval stages. Among them, seasonal changes of the weather play a critical role in H. contortus transmission and life cycle by affecting the survival and development of the free-living larval stages on pasture [45]. In general, H. contortus is regarded as being well-adapted to warm and humid climates [23], while it also poses a serious seasonal threat to ruminants living in temperate regions, such as Greece. This happens because of the increased ambient temperatures, which is the norm for several months during the year, allowing the development of the larval forms of the parasite, while the relatively shorter cold season results in the insufficient reduction in the parasitic burden in the pasturelands [33]. Most of the H. contortus eggs are dispersed during late winter and early spring. At this time, the parasitic burden in animals increases significantly. This increase is attributed to (i) the reactivation of the hypobiotic L4 larvae in ruminants’ abomasum, which results in a rise in adult worm populations and (ii) the periparturient rise in the egg output, which begins approximately two weeks before and lasts up to eight weeks after parturition. It was speculated that this rise was triggered by the immunosuppression caused by hormonal changes at the periparturient period, allowing a higher parasitic load [33,46], even though there was no clear association of a hormonal interference to the maintenance of this periparturient rise [47,48]. This increase in the parasitic burden on pastures contributes to the infection of animals with L3 larvae in late spring and early summer. Then, they develop into L4 larvae, which either cause the disease by feeding on blood or manifest the phenomenon of hypobiosis, re-infecting the pastures during the next productive season [33]. In our study, a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood of a goat to be infected by adult H. contortus was observed in spring and summer compared to winter.
In Greece, goats give birth mainly from January to March, the periparturition period at which most farmers choose to apply their anthelmintic treatments. The benefits of treating dams at parturition, when milk is consumed by the newborn kids or earlier during the last month of gestation, are the increased milk production and the avoidance of milk withdrawal periods. The grazing of the goats and, subsequently, their constant exposure to H. contortus initiate after the weaning of their kids and last approximately until one month before parturition (i.e., December). Therefore, it is obvious that, under these conditions, goats can be easily infected with H. contortus L3 larvae which, in turn, accumulate in the abomasum and evolve into adult helminths. This accumulative effect is more profound during winter months (i.e., several months post-anthelmintic treatment and constant grazing) and is enhanced by the strong selective pressure prevailing on pastures during summer months. Finally, this subsequent decrease in H. contortus burden may result from the development of host immunity, as a result of better nutrition (i.e., the presence of green vegetation) during spring and early summer compared to winter [9].

5. Conclusions

This study provides crucial insights into the epizootiology of H. contortus infection, revealing a higher prevalence of the infection in dairy small ruminants compared to previous epizootiological regional studies. Our findings highlighted that dairy sheep treated with pro/benzimidazoles and their lambs under two months old were significantly less likely to be infected by adult H. contortus. Similarly, the use of macrocyclic lactones, either alone or in combination with pro/benzimidazoles, were associated with a marked reduction in infection rates of dairy goats. Moreover, goat-raising farms experienced lower infection rates during the spring and summer months, a situation further confirmed at farms located over 300 m above sea level, underscoring the role of environmental factors in disease transmission. Finally, H. contortus infection was a minor problem in intensively managed dairy small ruminants. These findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted management practices and region-specific veterinary protocols to effectively reduce parasitic burdens. By addressing farm- and management-associated risk factors and implementing robust nematode control strategies, we can significantly mitigate the spread of H. contortus and curb the growing threat of anthelmintic resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.V.A. and E.P.; methodology, K.V.A. and E.P.; software, A.I.G.; validation, K.V.A., A.I.G. and E.P.; investigation, K.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, K.V.A. and A.I.G.; writing—review and editing, E.P., K.V.A. and A.I.G.; visualization, E.P.; supervision, E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a scholarship from the General Secretariat for Research and Technology and the Hellenic Foundation of Research and Innovation of Greece (funding number: 2361).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the School of Veterinary Medicine Ethics Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (protocol code 50/17 February 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the owner of the animals involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Familton, A.S.; McAnulty, R.W. Life cycles and development of nematode parasites of ruminants in sustainable control of internal parasites in ruminants. Anim. Ind. Workshop 1997, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
  2. Perry, B.D.; Randolph, T.F. Improving the assessment of the economic impact of parasitic diseases and of their control in production animals. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 84, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rehbein, S.; Visser, M.; Winter, R. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Parasitenbefalls von Bergschafen aus dem Oberpinzgau (Salzburg). Mitt. Österr Ges. Tropenmed Parasitol. 1999, 21, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgess, C.G.S.; Bartley, Y.; Redman, E.; Skuce, P.J.; Nath, M.; Whitelaw, F.; Tait, A.; Gilleard, J.S.; Jackson, F. A survey of the trichostrongylid nematode species present on UK sheep farms and associated anthelmintic control practices. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 189, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Domke, A.V.; Chartier, C.; Gjerde, B.; Leine, N.; Vatn, S.; Stuen, S. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths, lungworms and liver fluke in sheep and goats in Norway. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 194, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cringoli, G.; Rinaldi, L.; Veneziano, V.; Capelli, G. Efficacy of eprinomectin pour on against gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 112, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Torina, A.; Dara, S.; Marino, A.M.F.; Sparagano, O.A.E.; Vitale, F.; Reale, S.; Caracappa, S. Study on gastrointestinal nematodes of Sicilian sheep and goats. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 2004, 1026, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Uriarte, J.; Llorente, M.M.; Valderrábano, J. Seasonal changes of gastrointestinal nematode burden in sheep under an intensive grazing system. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 118, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Papadopoulos, E.; Arsenos, G.; Sotiraki, S.; Deligiannis, C.; Lainas, T.; Zygogiannis, D. The epizootiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasites in Greek dairy breeds of sheep and goats. Small Rum. Res. 2003, 47, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kantzoura, V.; Kouam, M.K.; Theodoropoulou, H.; Feidas, H.; Theodoropoulos, G. Prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in small ruminants in the Greek temperate Mediterranean environment. Open J. Vet. Med. 2012, 2, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Geurden, T.; Chartier, C.; Fanke, J.; Frangipane di Regalbono, A.; Traversa, D.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Demeler, J.; Vanimisetti, H.B.; Bartram, D.J.; Denwood, M.J. Anthelmintic resistance to ivermectin and moxidectin in gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Europe. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2015, 5, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hamel, D.; Bosco, A.; Rinaldi, L.; Cringoli, G.; Kaulfub, K.H.; Kellermann, M.; Fischer, J.; Wang, H.; Kley, K.; Mayr, S.; et al. Eprinomectin pour-on (EPRINEX® Pour-on, Merial): Efficacy against gastrointestinal and pulmonary nematodes and pharmacokinetics in sheep. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cringoli, G.; Veneziano, V.; Pennacchio, S.; Mezzino, L.; Santaniello, M.; Schioppi, M.; Fedele, V.; Rinaldi, L. Economic efficacy of anthelmintic treatments in dairy sheep naturally infected by gastrointestinal strongyles. Parassitologia 2007, 49, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Katsarou, E.I.; Papadopoulos, E. Haemonchosis: A challenging parasitic infection of sheep and goats. Animals 2014, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Geurden, T.; Hoste, H.; Jacquiet, P.; Traversa, D.; Sotiraki, S.; Frangipane di Regalbono, A.; Tzanidakis, N.; Kostopoulou, D.; Gaillac, C.; Privat, S.; et al. Anthelmintic resistance and multidrug resistance in sheep gastro-intestinal nematodes in France, Greece and Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 201, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gallidis, E.; Angelopoulou, K.; Papadopoulos, E. First identification of benzimidazole resistant Haemonchus contortus in sheep in Greece. Small Rum. Res. 2012, 106, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaimakamis, I.; Dotas, V.; Gourdouvelis, D.; Hatzizisis, L.; Koidou, M. Typology of mixed sheep and goat production system in the regional unit of Larissa, Greece. J. Hellenic Vet. Med. 2024, 75, 7917–7924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hillis, D.; Mable, B.K.; Larson, A.; Davis, S.K.; Zimmer, E.A. Nucleic acids IV: Sequencing and cloning. In Molecular Systematics, 2nd ed.; Hills, D., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K., Eds.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 321–382. [Google Scholar]
  19. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Minoudi, S.; Symeonidou, I.; Triantafyllidis, A.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Papadopoulos, E. Extensive countrywide molecular identification and high genetic diversity of Haemonchus spp. in domestic ruminants in Greece. Pathogens 2024, 13, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Besier, R.B.; Kahn, L.P.; Sargison, N.D.; Van Wyk, J.A. The pathophysiology, ecology and epidemiology of Haemonchus contortus infection in small ruminants. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 95–143. [Google Scholar]
  21. Barger, I.A. The role of epidemiological knowledge and grazing management for helminth control in small ruminants. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soulsby, E.J.L. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domestic Animals; Bailliere Tindall: London, UK, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  23. Flay, K.J.; Hill, F.I.; Muguiro, D.H. A review: Haemonchus contortus infection in pasture-based sheep production systems, with a focus on the pathogenesis of anaemia and changes in haematological parameters. Animals 2022, 12, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Papadopoulos, E.; Arsenos, G.; Coles, G.C.; Himonas, C. Gastrointestinal nematode infection pattern of Greek dairy goats reared under extensive husbandry conditions and treated with anthelmintics at different times during the year. Small Rum. Res. 2007, 69, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arsenopoulos, K.; Gelasakis, A.I.; Delistamatis, V.; Papadopoulos, E. Evaluation of the pour-on administration of eprinomectin on milk yield and somatic cell counts in dairy ewes naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, X2, 100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Termatzidou, S.A.; Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Siachos, N.; Kazana, P.; Papadopoulos, E.; Achard, D.; Karembe, H.; Bramis, G.; Arsenos, G. Anthelmintic activity of injectable eprinomectin (Eprecis® 20 mg/mL) in naturally infected dairy sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 266, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Minoudi, S.; Symeonidou, I.; Triantafyllidis, A.; Katsafadou, A.I.; Lianou, D.T.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Papadopoulos, E. Frequency of resistance to benzimidazoles of Haemonchus contortus helminths from dairy sheep, goats, cattle and buffaloes in Greece. Pathogens 2020, 9, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Van Dijk, J.; Sargison, N.D.; Kenyon, F.; Skuce, P.J. Climate change and infectious disease: Helminthological challenges to farmed ruminants in temperate regions. Animal 2010, 4, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Polley, L.; Hoberg, E.; Kutz, S. Climate change, parasites and shifting boundaries. Acta Vet. Scand. 2010, 52, S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sargison, N.D.; Wilson, D.J.; Bartley, D.J.; Penny, C.D.; Jackson, F. Haemonchosis and teladorsagiosis in a Scottish sheep flock putatively associated with the overwintering of hypobiotic fourth stage larvae. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 147, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Dijk, J.; David, G.O.; Baird, G.; Morgan, E.R. Back to the future: Developing hypotheses on the effects of climate change on ovine parasitic gastroenteritis from historical data. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 158, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kenyon, F.; Sargison, N.D.; Skuce, P.; Jackson, F. Sheep helminth parasitic disease in southeastern Scotland arising as a possible consequence of climate change. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taylor, M.A.; Coop, R.L.; Wall, R.L. Veterinary Parasitology; Blackwell Publishing: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Silvestre, A.; Sauve, C.; Cortet, J.; Cabaret, J. Contrasting genetic structures of two parasitic nematodes, determined on the basis of neutral microsatellite markers and selected anthelmintic resistance markers. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 5086–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brasil, B.S.A.F.; Nunes, R.L.; Bastianetto, E.; Drummond, M.G.; Carvalho, D.C.; Leite, R.C.; Molento, M.B.; Oliveira, D.A.A. Genetic diversity patterns of Haemonchus placei and Haemonchus contortus populations isolated from domestic ruminants in Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012, 42, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chaudhry, U.; Redman, E.M.; Abbas, M.; Muthusamy, R.; Ashraf, K.; Gilleard, J.S. Genetic evidence for hybridisation between Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei in natural field populations and its implications for interspecies transmission of anthelmintic resistance. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chaudhry, U.; Redman, E.M.; Ashraf, K.; Shabbir, M.Z.; Rashid, M.I.; Ashraf, S.; Gilleard, J.S. Microsatellite marker analysis of Haemonchus contortus populations from Pakistan suggests that frequent benzimidazole drug treatment does not result in a reduction of overall genetic diversity. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Babjak, M.; Dolinska, M.U.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Syrota, Y.; Komaromyova, M.; Varady, M. Effectiveness of benzimidazole treatments against Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats-Do they produce similar responses? Vet. Parasitol. 2024, 332, 110301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hofmann, R.R. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: A comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 1989, 78, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kasapidou, E.; Basdagianni, Z.; Papadopoulos, V.; Karaiskou, C.; Kesidis, A.; Tsiotsias, A. Effects of intensive and semi-intensive production on sheep milk chemical composition, physicochemical characteristics, fatty acid profile and nutritional indices. Animals 2021, 11, 2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morgan-Davies, C.; Tesniere, G.; Gautier, J.M.; Jorgensen, G.H.M.; Gonzalez-Garcia, E.; Patsios, S.I.; Sossidou, E.N.; Keady, T.W.J.; McClearn, B.; Kenyon, F.; et al. Review: Exploring the use of precision livestock farming for small ruminant welfare management. Animal 2024, 18, 101233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Adduci, I.; Sajovitz, F.; Hinney, B.; Lichtmannsperge, K.; Joachim, A.; Wittek, T.; Yan, S. Haemonchosis in sheep and goats, control strategies and development of vaccines against Haemonchus contortus. Animals 2022, 12, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Aguilar-Caballero, A.J. Nutrition-parasite interactions in goats: Is immunoregulation involved in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunol. 2008, 30, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abella, J.C.V.; Becerra, R.J.A.; Manrique, L.E.T. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in crossbred sheep diagnosed at different altitudes in the Highland Boyaca-Colombia. Red Vet. 2020, 21, 38–49. [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Connor, L.J.; Walkden-Brown, S.W.; Kahn, L.P. Ecology of the free-living stages of major trichostrongylid parasites of sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 42, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fleming, M.W. Acute or chronic administration of prolactin alters ovine infections of Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 1993, 50, 109–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Beasley, A.M.; Kahn, L.P.; Windon, R.G. The periparturient relaxation of immunity in Merino ewes infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis: Endocrine and body compositional responses. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 168, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beasley, A.M.; Kahn, L.P.; Windon, R.G. The influence of reproductive physiology and nutrient supply on the periparturient relaxation of immunity to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis in Merino ewes. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 188, 306–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the abattoirs around Greece, which were visited for the collection of sheep’s and goats’ abomasa. Numbers 1 to 48 represent different prefectures/islands included in the study.
Figure 1. Location of the abattoirs around Greece, which were visited for the collection of sheep’s and goats’ abomasa. Numbers 1 to 48 represent different prefectures/islands included in the study.
Animals 15 00487 g001
Figure 2. Detection of the amplified internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of Haemonchus spp. MW: 100 base pairs ladder; 1–18 and 20: amplified ITS2 sequences of collected Haemonchus spp.; and 19: negative control sample.
Figure 2. Detection of the amplified internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of Haemonchus spp. MW: 100 base pairs ladder; 1–18 and 20: amplified ITS2 sequences of collected Haemonchus spp.; and 19: negative control sample.
Animals 15 00487 g002
Table 1. Categorized data included in the questionnaire.
Table 1. Categorized data included in the questionnaire.
1. Abattoir Information
Location of theabattoir
Visit day
Season
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Winter
2. Animals Information
Age
<2 months
2–15 months
>15 months
Sex
Male
Female
Species
Sheep
Goat
3. Farm Information
Management system
Semi-intensive
Intensive
Altitude
<300 m a.s.l.
>300 m a.s.l.
Co-existence of sheep and goats
Single-species farming
Mixed-species farming
Anthelmintic treatment
Exclusively pro/benzimidazoles
Exclusively macrocyclic lactones
Combination of pro/benzimidazoles
and macrocyclic lactones
No anthelmintic treatment
a.s.l.: above sea level.
Table 2. Prevalence values (±95% Confidence Intervals) of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep and goats in various prefectures/islands (based on the enumeration in Figure 1) of Greece.
Table 2. Prevalence values (±95% Confidence Intervals) of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep and goats in various prefectures/islands (based on the enumeration in Figure 1) of Greece.
GreeceRegionPrefecture/IslandNumbers
from Figure 1
Sheep (%)Goats (%)
ContinentalThraceEvros126.7 (10.9–52.0)11.1 (2.0–43.5)
Rodopi218.8 (6.6–43.0)25.0 (7.2–59.1)
Xanthi340.0 (19.8–64.3)27.3 (9.8–56.6)
MacedoniaKavala428.6 (11.7–54.7)16.7 (4.7–44.8)
Serres542.9 (21.4–67.4)13.3 (3.7–37.9)
Kilkis642.9 (21.4–67.4)36.4 (15.2–64.6)
Thessaloniki743.8 (23.1–66.8)33.3 (15.2–58.3)
Chalkidiki842.9 (21.4–67.4)26.7 (10.9–52.0)
Imathia935.7 (16.3–61.2)45.5 (21.3–72.0)
Pieria1028.6 (11.7–54.7)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
Kozani1131.3 (14.2–55.6)21.4 (7.6–47.6)
Grevena1225.0 (10.2–49.5)42.9 (15.8–75.0)
Kastoria1329.4 (13.3–53.1)25.0 (7.2–59.1)
Florina1457.1 (32.6–78.6)18.2 (5.1–47.7)
ThessalyLarissa1550.0 (29.0–71.0)53.3 (30.1–75.2)
Karditsa1631.6 (15.4–54.0)47.1 (26.2–69.0)
Trikala1738.9 (20.3–61.4)36.8 (19.2–59.0)
Magnesia1829.4 (13.3–53.1)35.0 (18.1–56.7)
EpirusIoannina1928.6 (11.7–54.7)20.0 (5.7–51.0)
Thesprotia2035.7 (16.3–61.2)27.3 (9.8–56.7)
Preveza2135.7 (16.3–61.2)36.4 (15.2–64.6)
Central GreeceAitoloakarnania2242.9 (21.4–67.4)37.5 (13.7–69.4)
Evritania2350.0 (26.8–73.2)42.9 (15.8–75.0)
Fokida2435.7 (16.3–61.2)60.0 (23.1–88.2)
Fthiotida2542.9 (21.4–67.4)25.0 (7.2–59.1)
Viotia2650.0 (26.8–73.2)37.5 (13.7–69.4)
PelopponneseAchaia2757.1 (32.6–78.6)28.6 (8.2–64.1)
Arkadia2842.9 (21.4–67.4)14.3 (2.6–51.3)
Messinia2964.3 (38.8–83.7)28.6 (8.2–64.1)
Lakonia3071.4 (45.4–88.3)14.3 (2.6–51.3)
InsularCycladesSyros3183.3 (43.7–93.0)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Paros3233.3 (9.7–70.0)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Naxos3333.3 (9.7–70.0)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
Nothern SporadesSkopelos3483.3 (43.7–97.0)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Alonnisos3533.3 (9.7–70.0)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
DodekaneseLeros3666.7 (30.0–90.3)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Kalimnos3750.0 (18.8–81.2)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
Rhodes3833.3 (12.1–64.6)33.3 (12.1–64.6)
Astypalea3916.7 (3.0–56.4)16.7 (3.0–56.4)
Northern–Eastern AegeanLesvos4050.0 (18.8–81.2)33.3 (12.1–64.6)
Samos4116.7 (3.0–56.4)16.7 (3.0–56.4)
CreteRethymno4283.3 (43.7–97.0)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
Heraklion4383.3 (43.7–97.0)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
IonianCorfu4420.0 (5.7–51.0)16.7 (3.0–56.4)
Zakynthos4533.3 (9.7–70.0)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Kefallonia4650.0 (18.8–81.2)50.0 (18.8–81.2)
Kythira4716.7 (3.0–56.4)16.7 (3.0–56.4)
Central GreeceEvia4853.3 (30.1–75.2)33.3 (9.7–70.0)
Table 3. Numbers and percentages of sheep and goats infected by Haemonchus contortus per farm- and host-related risk factor (i.e., co-existence of sheep and goats, anthelmintic treatment, age, farm location altitude, management system, sex, and season).
Table 3. Numbers and percentages of sheep and goats infected by Haemonchus contortus per farm- and host-related risk factor (i.e., co-existence of sheep and goats, anthelmintic treatment, age, farm location altitude, management system, sex, and season).
Sheep *%Goats *%
Co-existence of sheep and goats
Single-species farming16268.99669.6
Mixed-species farming7331.14230.4
Anthelmintic treatment
Exclusively pro/benzimidazoles12553.28561.6
Exclusively macrocyclic lactones2711.51108.0
Combination of pro/benzimidazoles
and macrocyclic lactones
2711.51309.4
No anthelmintic treatment5623.82921.0
Age
<2 months4217.95640.6
2–15 months11348.15842.0
>15 months8034.02417.4
Altitude
<300 m a.s.l.16068.111885.5
>300 m a.s.l.7531.92014.5
Management system
Semi-intensive19382.113094.2
Intensive4217.9805.8
Sex
Male10645.16144.2
Female12954.97755.8
Season
Spring3615.33424.6
Summer8536.13726.8
Autumn5925.24129.8
Winter5523.42618.8
a.s.l.: above sea level. * The total numbers of sheep and goats with H. contortus infection are 235 and 138, respectively.
Table 4. Beta-coefficients (±standard errors), Wald test, p-values, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the risk factors of sheep infected by Haemonchus contortus.
Table 4. Beta-coefficients (±standard errors), Wald test, p-values, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the risk factors of sheep infected by Haemonchus contortus.
BS.E.Waldp-ValueOdds Ratio95% C.I.
for Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
Mixed-species farming−0.120.2140.300.5840.890.591.35
Single-species farmingRef.
Pro/benzimidazoles−2.190.38133.060.0000.110.050.24
Macrocyclic lactones−2.030.44420.830.0000.130.060.32
Pro/benzimidazoles
and macrocyclic lactones
−2.140.44023.640.0000.120.050.28
No anthelmintic treatmentRef.
<2 months−1.610.27933.150.0000.200.120.35
2–15 months−0.190.2470.590.4410.830.511.34
>15 months Ref.
<300 m a.s.l.0.040.2090.040.8431.040.691.57
>300 m a.s.l.Ref.
Semi-intensive1.000.23418.450.0002.731.734.32
IntensiveRef.
Male0.050.1960.070.7971.050.721.55
FemaleRef.
Spring0.240.3370.500.4791.270.662.46
Summer0.260.2710.890.3461.290.762.20
Autumn−0.530.2933.210.0730.590.331.05
WinterRef.
Constant1.440.4998.370.0044.23
Β: b-coefficient, S.E.: standard error, C.I.: confidence interval, a.s.l.: above sea level, Ref.: Reference category.
Table 5. Beta-coefficients (±standard errors), Wald test, p-values, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the risk factors of goats infected by Haemonchus contortus.
Table 5. Beta-coefficients (±standard errors), Wald test, p-values, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the risk factors of goats infected by Haemonchus contortus.
BS.E.Waldp-ValueOdds Ratio95% C.I. for Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
Mixed-species farming0.050.2500.040.8351.050.651.72
Single-species farming Ref.
Pro/benzimidazoles−3.950.81123.690.0000.020.000.10
Macrocyclic lactones−4.400.87925.010.0000.010.000.07
Pro/benzimidazoles
and macrocyclic lactones
−4.300.85825.010.0000.010.000.07
No anthelmintic treatment Ref.
<2 months0.230.3100.530.4671.250.682.30
2–15 months0.220.3130.470.4911.240.672.29
>15 months Ref.
<300 m a.s.l.0.970.3099.750.0022.631.434.82
>300 m a.s.l. Ref.
Semi-intensive1.200.5454.810.0283.301.149.62
Intensive Ref.
Male−0.020.2350.010.9330.980.621.55
Female Ref.
Spring−0.960.3626.980.0080.380.190.78
Summer−0.940.3865.870.0150.390.180.84
Autumn−0.550.3502.430.1190.580.291.15
Winter Ref.
Constant1.630.9802.760.0975.09
Β: b-coefficient, S.E.: standard error, C.I.: confidence interval, a.s.l.: above sea level, Ref.: Reference category.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Gelasakis, A.I.; Papadopoulos, E. Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants’ Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors. Animals 2025, 15, 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040487

AMA Style

Arsenopoulos KV, Gelasakis AI, Papadopoulos E. Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants’ Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors. Animals. 2025; 15(4):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arsenopoulos, Konstantinos V., Athanasios I. Gelasakis, and Elias Papadopoulos. 2025. "Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants’ Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors" Animals 15, no. 4: 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040487

APA Style

Arsenopoulos, K. V., Gelasakis, A. I., & Papadopoulos, E. (2025). Abattoir Countrywide Survey of Dairy Small Ruminants’ Haemonchosis in Greece and Associated Risk Factors. Animals, 15(4), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop