Next Article in Journal
Proximity to Water Sources and Avoidance of Human Settlements Drive Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Occupancy During Spring in an Urban-Proximate National Park in South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Pasture Heterogeneity Improves Donkey Welfare: Effects of Structural Variation, Species Diversity, and Sward Height on Herd Emotional States
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review: Current Strategies for Detoxification of Deoxynivalenol in Feedstuffs for Pigs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Nutritional Strategies on Performance, Gut Barrier Function and Microbiota Composition in Weaned Piglets

by
Sara Isusi
1,2,*,
Guillermo Usero-Alonso
1,
Jose Alberto Murillo
1,
Ana Belén Gonzalez-Guijarro
2,
Antonio Muñoz
2,3 and
Guillermo Ramis
2,3
1
R&D Department, FarmFaes—Ingaso Farm, Laciego, 01308 Vitoria, Spain
2
Departamento de Produccion Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
3
Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biomedica Pascual Parrilla, 30120 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(23), 3422; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233422
Submission received: 24 October 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 22 November 2025 / Published: 27 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pig Microbiome: Gut Influences and Beyond)

Simple Summary

Weaning is a stressful moment for piglets that often causes digestive problems, poor growth, and increased mortality. Traditionally, antibiotics were used in feed to control these issues, but recent regulations restrict their use. As a result, the pig industry is searching for natural alternatives to protect the gut health of young pigs. In this study, a gut health-promoting additive was tested in the feed of piglets at post-weaning to see if it could support the animals during this critical period. Changes in gut health and intestinal inflammation were measured through fecal samples, and pig growth and survival were monitored over time. Results showed that while the gut barrier did not change significantly, signs of inflammation decreased. Piglets in the supplemented diet also grew better and had lower death rates than those on a standard diet. These findings suggest that targeted nutritional strategies may help piglets stay healthy without relying on banned substances. This could be beneficial to more sustainable pig production under current legal restrictions.

Abstract

The restriction of antibiotics and therapeutic zinc oxide in piglet diets has increased challenges related to gut health and post-weaning performance. This study assessed the effects of a diet supplemented with organic acids and the probiotic Clostridium butyricum on intestinal integrity, fecal microbiota composition, and performance parameters in weaned piglets. Forty piglets were selected at weaning, and fecal samples were collected on day 0 and day 14 of supplementation. Gene expression of tight junction proteins (zonulin, occludin) and inflammatory markers (calprotectin, IFN-γ, TGF-β) was analyzed by PCR. Bacterial DNA quantification was used to evaluate microbiota changes. In addition, average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality were recorded across three feeding phases: CONTROL, TRANSITION, and 0M. No significant changes were found in tight junction protein expression post-weaning, but reductions in IFN-γ and TGF-β suggest improved immune modulation. Piglets in the TRANSITION and 0M groups showed higher ADG (CONTROL = 292.28 g/day; TRANSITION = 300.09 g/day; 0M = 307.45 g/day) and reduced mortality (CONTROL = 6.48%; TRANSITION = 5.10%; 0M = 5.08%) compared to CONTROL. These findings indicate that targeted dietary supplementation can support gut health and performance in weaned piglets, offering a promising alternative to medicated feed under current regulatory constraints. Further research is guaranteed to refine these strategies for broader application in sustainable pig production.

1. Introduction

Commercial weaning usually takes place around 21–28 days of age in piglets, and it is recognized as a critical period that induces stress and leads to abrupt changes in the gut, which can negatively affect growth performance and increase the risk of health issues, such as diarrhea [1].
The intestinal epithelium plays a critical role in maintaining the barrier function, which is essential to protect the organism from harmful substances while allowing nutrient absorption. This barrier is primarily established through tight junctions (TJs) and a dynamic interplay of cellular mechanisms that regulate permeability and repair. Tight junctions form a selective barrier that regulates paracellular permeability between the intestinal lumen and serosa and the pore size of the epithelium, known as ‘gate function’ [2]. Early weaning results in increased intestinal permeability and decreased expression of tight junction proteins in piglets [3]. Inflammatory markers also contribute to gut health assessment. Calprotectin is a crucial biomarker in the gut, primarily indicating inflammation and aiding in the diagnosis and management of various gastrointestinal diseases [4]. Meanwhile, cytokines, such as transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and interleukins (IL) IL-1α and IL-6, are continuously expressed by the intestinal epithelium and may play a role in the basal flow of immune cells in the gut mucosa [5]. As well, elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines correlate with structural changes in the intestinal mucosa, contributing to conditions like post-weaning diarrhea [6].
Another key aspect in maintaining piglet health is the intestinal microbiota, which plays an essential role in nutrient absorption, immune system development, and protection against pathogens, and it is determined by various factors, such as diet, age, stress and environment [1]. Bacterial colonization in the gut has profound effects on both the morphology of the intestine and the expression of inflammatory cytokines, which could have implications for understanding gut health and disease in pigs [7]. The development of the intestinal microbiota in piglets begins at birth when neonates are exposed to microorganisms through the vaginal canal and their immediate environment [8] and continues during lactation, closely resembling that of their mothers, preparing them to transition from milk to solid food. The presence of specific bacterial groups, like Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, plays a crucial role in these metabolic processes, influencing the piglets’ growth and health [8]. There are some genera of bacteria identified as the “core” microbiome, consisting of 19 bacterial genera, including Bacteroides, Prevotella and Lactobacillus, which are present in over 90% of pigs across different ages, and they are crucial for the growth and gut health of the host [1].
With recent findings about post-weaning and the ban on high levels of antibiotics and zinc oxide (ZnO) in feed, there is a growing interest in nutritional alternatives [1], such as organic acids and probiotics. Acids are compounds typically classified as organic and inorganic and can improve growth by reducing or maintaining gastric pH, thereby increasing nutrient digestibility and limiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Combinations of organic acids are used commercially, as the response of the mixture of acids is better than using only one, due to the different properties of the acids throughout the gastrointestinal tract [9]. However, the effects of organic acids on gut microbiota composition are less clear, with some studies showing little impact on microbial structure. The controversy mainly stems from variable results, differences in product formulations, and the complexity of piglet gut health, making it challenging to predict outcomes in every setting [10].
On the other hand, probiotics have shown benefits such as reducing digestive disorders, improving growth, and supporting gut health, but research results are often inconsistent and vary between farms, likely due to differences in probiotic strains, dosages, and management practices [11]. Clostridium butyricum as a probiotic has been used in recent years, as it has been reported to influence the better growth of animals, improve immune response and regulate the structure and composition of the gut microbiota, as its addition to the diet leads to an increase in the height of the intestinal villi and a greater depth of the crypts [12].
This study aimed to evaluate a nutritional strategy for the gradual reduction in pharmacological levels of zinc oxide (ZnO) in nursery pig diets. The approach consisted of the three feeding phases with decreasing ZnO inclusion and the incorporation of gut health-promoting additives. This strategy was designed to support intestinal integrity, promote a stable microbiota transition, and ultimately enable the withdrawal of ZnO without compromising animal performance. We hypothesized that supplementing the diet with specific gut health additives would enhance intestinal integrity and microbiota stability during the weaning transition, thereby maintaining performance and reducing weaning-associated stress.

2. Materials and Methods

The methods of animal handling during research were developed by the ethical principles set out in the European Directive 2008/120/EC, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2008) [13], and in the national legislation, as outlined in Royal Decree 1135/2002, published in the BOE (2002) [14], which establishes the minimum welfare requirements for pigs kept for commercial production, including housing conditions, feeding care, and management practices. These provisions were applied together with the updates and requirements introduced by Royal Decree 159/2023 [15]. Only non-invasive fecal sampling and routine performance monitoring were conducted, in accordance with current animal welfare legislation. The study also complied with the general principles of Royal Decree 53/2013 [16], although no experimental or invasive procedures requiring ethical approval were performed.

2.1. Experimental Design and Housing

The study was conducted under field conditions in four commercial nursery farms located in northeastern Spain. Data was collected across three defined time periods, each corresponding to a specific dietary treatment applied during the first two weeks post-weaning (days 1–14). From day 15 onwards, all piglets received the same basal diet until the end of the nursery stage. The three experimental periods were (1) CONTROL (3 January 2019–31 May 2021), where piglets received a standard initial feed (IF) supplemented with 3.1 kg/ton of ZnO; (2) TRANSITION (1 June 2021–26 June 2022), where the same IF was used but supplemented with a reduced dose of ZnO (2.1 kg/ton) and a gut health additive blend consisting of sorbic acid with an inclusion of 65 g/kg, benzoic acid with an inclusion of 165 g/kg and a probiotic (Clostridium butyricum) with an inclusion of 1.25 × 1011 UFC/kg; and (3) 0M (27 June 2022–24 June 2024), where the IF contained only the additive blend described above, with no ZnO supplementation.
During the 0M period, a subset of 10 clinically healthy weaned piglets (28 days old) was randomly selected from each farm (n = 40). Selection criteria ensured similar initial body weights and health status, representative of the entire population. All piglets were housed in conventional nursery facilities with 20 animals per pen and provided with ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the experimental period. Fecal samples were collected individually from the selected piglets on the day of weaning (day 0) and again on day 14 post-weaning for microbiota and intestinal health marker analyses.

2.2. Performance Data

Performance data were collected from a total of 491,000 piglets raised in four commercial nursery farms located in northeastern Spain between 2019 and 2024. Animals were distributed across different batches (n = 140), which served as the experimental unit for statistical analysis. The number of batches and average animals per batch per farm were as follows: Farm A: 30 batches, 5700 piglets per batch; Farm B: 35 batches, 3800 piglets per batch; Farm C: 40 batches, 3100 piglets/batch; and Farm D: 35 batches, 1800 piglets/batch.
Batches were assigned to one of the three experimental periods based on time of production and the diet applied during the initial nursery phase (days 1–14 post-weaning): (1) CONTROL, n = 174,000 piglets; (2) TRANSITION, n = 105,000 piglets; and (3) 0M, n = 212,000 piglets. For each batch, the following performance parameters were recorded: initial body weight (BW0), final body weight (BW1), average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality rate. The nursery cycle began at 28 ± 5 days of age with an average body weight of 5.5 ± 0.5 kg and ended at 44 ± 4 days of age, with a final body weight of 18 ± 2.7 kg.

2.3. Diets

After weaning, piglets received different initial diets during the first 14 days of the nursery phase, depending on the experimental period (CONTROL, TRANSITION or 0M). These diets were formulated with different levels of ZnO and inclusion or absence of gut health additives as part of the nutritional strategies under evaluation. None of the diets contained antibiotics. The formulation of each initial feed—including ingredient composition and estimated nutrient content—is detailed in Table 1.
Diets were analyzed for crude protein (CP), metabolizable energy (ME), standardized ileal digestible lysine (Lys SID), and Lys SID to net energy ratio (Lys SID/NE). Differences between diets were not statistically compared, as formulations were designed to be nutritionally equivalent except for the tested additives.

2.4. Animal Sampling

Fecal samples were collected aseptically and directly from the rectal ampoule of each piglet to prevent environmental contamination. Each fecal sample was split into two 100 mg portions and placed into 1.5 mL sterile Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf Canada Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. One sample was used for microbiota analysis, while the second was used for gut health biomarker analysis, including markers of intestinal integrity and inflammation.

2.5. Microbiota Composition Analysis—16S rRNA Isolation

Fecal samples were analyzed at the Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Pascual Parrilla, El Palmar (Murcia), España, using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to assess microbial composition and diversity. This technique enables identification and characterization of bacterial taxa without the need for culturing. Taxonomic assignments are possible due to the presence of hypervariable regions (V1–V9) containing sufficient sequence diversity to classify microorganisms. A single-step qPCR methodology combining amplification of the region of interest together with the addition of barcodes and Illumina adapters has been used. Real-time PCR allows absolute quantification of the copy number by means of a standard curve. DNA extraction and library preparation were performed using the “Quick-16S Plus NGS Library Prep Kit (V3–V4, UDI)” (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), which targets the V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The primers used for amplification were:
  • - Forward: 341f (CCTACGGGDGGCWGCAG, CCTAYGGGGYGCWGCAG).
  • - Reverse: 806r (GACTACNVGGGTMTCTAATCC).
For each reaction, 1–10 ng of extracted DNA was used. A single-step qPCR protocol was applied, combining target amplification, barcode addition, and adapter ligation. This produced amplicons of approximately 606 bp, which were pooled in equal volumes and purified using magnetic bead-based cleanup, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Final libraries were sequenced on the NextSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp). The analysis yielded the relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the family, genus, and species levels. Taxonomic classification was based on sequence comparison within the conserved and variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene.

2.6. Sequencing of Intestinal Integrity Markers

Gene expression analysis was conducted to evaluate the markers related to intestinal barrier function and immune response. The target genes included two tight junction (TJ) proteins: occludin (OCL) and zonulin1 (ZON); an indicator of the presence of inflammatory cells: calprotectin S100 (CAL); and two cytokines representative of inflammatory (IFNγ) and anti-inflammatory (TGF-β) activity. Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR (qPCR) were performed to quantify mRNA expression levels of each gene. Primers specific to each gene are detailed in Table 2. All qPCR reactions were conducted in triplicate to ensure data reliability and reproducibility.

2.7. Bioinformatics and Statistical Analysis

Performance data were analyzed using XLSTAT (v2023.1.6.1410, Addinsoft, Denver, CO, USA) in Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics (means ± standard error of the mean, SEM) were calculated for each performance parameter. Comparisons between experimental periods were made using one-way ANOVA. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
For microbiota analysis, raw sequencing data were processed following the standard workflow of the institutional Bioinformatics Platform. Primary FASTQ files were generated using the Dragen BCL Convert V12.7.4 pipeline, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA, and subsequently transferred to the platform for downstream analysis, which included quality filtering, denoising and chimera removal. Taxonomic assignment of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was performed using the SILVA reference database (March 2020). In addition, relative numbering was carried out using a real-time PCR standard curve generated from serial dilutions of the ZymoBIOMICSTM, Irvine, CA, USA 16S qPCR Standard (7.5 × 106 copies/µL). Bacterial families, genera, and species were ranked by relative abundance, and taxa representing ≥1% of total relative abundance in at least one sample were considered predominant for downstream analyses. Differences in the relative abundance of bacterial taxa between pre-weaning and post-weaning samples were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA in XLSTAT (v2023.1.6.1410, Addinsoft, Denver, CO, USA), with sampling time (day 0 vs. day 14 post-weaning) as the fixed factor. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
For intestinal integrity markers, differences between time points (weaning vs. day 14 post-weaning) were analyzed by paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA, as appropriate. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to visualize clustering patterns based on gene expression data.
Finally, Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between bacterial relative abundance at the genus level and the gene expression levels of intestinal integrity and immune markers. Correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated, and associations were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Productive Data

Table 3 below shows the results of the performance data between the three periods. It can be observed that the initial body weight (BW0) remained stable over the three periods. Final body weight (BW1) and average daily gain (ADG) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in CONTROL than in TRANSITION or the 0M period. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) and % mortality were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in CONTROL than in TRANSITION or the 0M period.

3.2. Evolution of the Fecal Microbiota After Weaning

Table 4 shows the differences in relative abundance of the bacterial species studied between pre-weaning and post-weaning. Lactobacillus reuteri, [Eubacterium] biforme, Ruminococcus bromii, and Desulfovibrio piger increased significantly (p < 0.05). Bilophila wadsworthia, Eubacterium coprostanoligenes, Ruminococcus faecis, and Alistipes shahii decreased significantly after weaning (p < 0.05).
The results of the relative abundance of bacterial genera between pre-weaning and post-weaning are shown in Figure 1, where Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus increased during the 14 days post-weaning, while others, such as Bilophila and Faecalibacterium, decreased.

3.3. Evolution of the Intestinal Integrity After Weaning

PCA of all intestinal integrity showed a clear separation between them, with IFN-γ and TGF-β clustering in the pre-weaning zone on the one hand and calprotectin and occludin towards the post-weaning zone on the other, with two principal components explaining 27.34% of the variation in Figure 2.
Table 5 shows the mean expression results of the gut integrity markers and the differences between pre-weaning and post-weaning. The two factors that have a significant difference are INF-γ and TGF-β (p < 0.05).

3.4. Correlation Between Intestinal Integrity and Fecal Microbiota

It can be seen from the results of the correlations between bacterial species and the markers of intestinal integrity studied in Table 6 that Eubacterium biforme has a significant (p < 0.010) negative correlation with calprotectin, while Roseburia faecis has a positive correlation; Lactobacillus reuteri has a negative correlation with occludin, while Desulfovibrio piger has a significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation; Faecalibacterium prausnitzii has a significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation with zonulin; Bilophila wadsworthia has a positive correlation with IFN-γ; and Ruminococcus faecis has a significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation with TGF-β.

4. Discussion

For decades, post-weaning enteric disease prevention relied on the use of ZnO and antibiotics. However, their restriction in the EU, including the ban of ZnO at therapeutic levels since June 2022 [20,21], has declined nursery performance, worsened post-weaning enteric diseases, increased mortality, and even aggravated common pathologies such as streptococcosis due to deterioration in gut integrity [22,23]. This study presents a transition strategy until the total elimination of ZnO, incorporating a probiotic and a blend of organic acids. Results showed improved performance rather than decline. Different studies confirm probiotics’ benefits, with B. subtilis achieving similar ADG and FCR compared to those obtained with therapeutic doses of ZnO [24]. Furthermore, using a probiotic mix of C. butyricum, B. subtilis and B. licheniformis enhanced ADG and FCR, matching antibiotic-treated groups [10]. Using C. butyricum alone also improved ADG, with even better results when combined with B. licheniformis [25]. Conversely, another study found no significant ADG differences but reported a 200 g/kg FCR increase [26]. Our study demonstrated that the combination of ZnO reduction and probiotic supplementation improves the performance data. Moreover, this improvement persists over time even after ZnO withdrawal, suggesting a shift in the farm microbiota.
In the study, we found that weaning leads to some changes in microbiota composition. At weaning, the families with the highest relative abundance in the samples were Enterobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae and Ruminococcaceae. These findings differ from previous studies that reported alternative profiles for the same period [27]. These differences suggest that the composition of the microbiota before weaning is influenced by various factors such as sow nutrition and health status, piglet management, and environmental conditions [28]. At the genus level, the most abundant taxa in our study at weaning were Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium, Bilophila, Prevotella, Phascolarctobacterium, and Bacteroides. This pattern aligns with studies reporting Lactobacillus, Bacteroides and Streptococcus as dominant genera during lactation [29], due to their ability to utilize a wide range of milk oligosaccharides [30].
Notably, certain bacterial genera, such as Lactobacillus and Bacteroides, persisted after weaning. In particular, the genus Lactobacillus plays a crucial role in promoting intestinal health by regulating immune-related pathways, especially the IgA-mediated intestinal immunity network [31]. Its persistence may be attributed to the presence of organic acids in the diet, which promote growth by reducing or establishing gastric pH, increasing proteolysis and nutrient absorption, and limiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria [32]. Beyond acidification, additional mechanisms may explain the resilience of Lactobacillus after weaning. First, several Lactobacillus species can degrade complex polysaccharides, allowing adaptation to the cereal-based solid diets rich in starch and non-digestible carbohydrates that piglets receive post-weaning [33]. Second, during the early post-weaning period, the delayed maturation of host pancreatic α-amylase results in undigested starch reaching the lower intestine, providing an accessible substrate for Lactobacillus and other saccharolytic bacteria [34]. And third, Lactobacillus is consistently reported as a part of the core porcine microbiome across suckling, nursery, and grow-finishing stages, being consistently involved in carbohydrate fermentation [35]. These processes, together with the observed increase in species of Lactobacillus such as L. reuteri, suggest the establishment of a healthier, low-pH microbial environment after dietary transition.
Changes in microbiota composition not only impact microbial colonization but also play a crucial role in shaping intestinal morphology and modulating cytokine expression [7]. In the present study, no significant differences were observed in the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins, and the calprotectin concentrations remained stable between days 0 and 14. Although these results contrast with reports of early post-weaning TJ disruption [2], they may reflect improved microbial resilience in our system. The observed increase in L. reuteri—associated with lactate production, reduced luminal pH and enhanced colonization resistance—supports this interpretation and may indicate a more balanced microbial environment during the transition.
Beyond these genus-specific associations, microbial metabolites act as a key mechanistic link between microbiota composition and intestinal integrity. SCFA-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, members of Ruminococcaceae, Oscillibacter or certain Lachnospiraceae generate acetate, propionate and butyrate, which are essential for epithelial physiology. Butyrate serves as the primary energy source for colonocytes, promotes epithelial repair, and strengthens barrier function by enhancing TJ protein assembly [36]. It also exerts anti-inflammatory effects by increasing regulatory T cell activity and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling. Likewise, lactate-producing bacteria such as Lactobacillus help maintain a low gut pH and inhibit the growth of opportunistic pathogens, supporting epithelial stability during the stressful post-weaning phase [37]. Furthermore, commensal bacteria play a central role in colonization resistance. After weaning, dysbiosis typically leads to an expansion of Enterobacteriaceae and other facultative anaerobes, which is associated with intestinal inflammation and post-weaning diarrhea [22]. In contrast, beneficial taxa like Bacteroides, Ligilactobacillus salivarus, and Lactobacillus amylovorus contribute to immune stimulation [38], competitive exclusion of pathogens, and maintenance of barrier integrity. The presence of anti-inflammatory genera such as Faecalibacterium before weaning has been proposed as a protective factor against post-weaning dysbiosis [33], suggesting that a more mature and SCFA-rich microbiota may help mitigate inflammatory responses after transition to solid feed.
High fecal calprotectin is linked to dysbiosis, marked by increased pro-inflammatory microbiota and reduced short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria [39]. In this study, species from the genus Bacteroides that produce medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) exhibited a positive correlation with elevated calprotectin levels. This finding may be explained by the role of certain species, such as Bacteroides fragilis, which plays a role in maintaining eubiosis in the gastrointestinal tract through MCFA production. However, B. fragilis can also act as an opportunistic pathogen under conditions of intestinal dysbiosis, highlighting its dual role in gut health [40]. Altogether, these results support the idea that the stability of physiological markers observed in our study may be partly explained by the persistence or functional compensation of beneficial microbial populations such as L. reuteri or Eubacterium capable of producing SCFAs, lactate, and other regulatory metabolites. These microbial features appear to support epithelial barrier maintenance and limit inflammatory activation during the post-weaning period.
Significant differences were observed in the levels of IFN-γ and TGF-β, with both showing decreased expression in fecal samples after weaning. Previous studies have reported that IFN-γ expression increases up to 15 days post-weaning, indicating a prolonged immune response, while TGF-β expression in the gut tends to decline during this period [41]. These changes, nonetheless, appear to be transient [42]. In this study, we also observed positive correlations between the expression of TGF-β and bacterial species such as Ruminococcus faecis. This finding suggested that TGF-β may play a pivotal role in maintaining intestinal structure and function during the weaning process [42], as this bacterial species belongs to a genus known for its contribution to short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. PCA supported these findings, showing that IFN-γ and TGF-β expression were linked to the pre-weaning phase, where immune activation and stress enhance the adaptive response and gut microbiota maturation, key for immune function [43]. In contrast, occludin expression is associated with the post-weaning samples, suggesting a potential role in the repair of the intestinal epithelium following weaning [44]. Other authors, however, have found that occludin expression decreases 14 days after weaning, indicating that the intestinal barrier is not yet repaired and intestinal permeability is increased [2]. The initial findings regarding the gut health additive are promising; however, further research is essential to explore its implications and potential applications across diverse contexts. A deeper understanding of how variables such as diet, environment and sanitary conditions interact with gut health additives will be crucial for optimizing their use.
The authors are aware that the main limitation of this study is the lack of microbiota data for the CONTROL and TRANSITION periods. However, the decision to conduct this study was based on the observation that the performance data improved during the TRANSITION period and persisted even after ZnO removal.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, the results show that gradual reduction of zinc oxide, combined with organic acids and Clostridium butyricum, can support a stable and functionally resilient intestinal ecosystem during the post-weaning transition. This strategy did not compromise performance under commercial conditions, likely because the acid blend promoted a lower intestinal pH that favored beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bacteroides, while the increase in Eubacterium and Ruminococcus suggests enhanced production of butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids essential for epithelial repair and anti-inflammatory balance. The inclusion of C. butyricum further strengthened microbial stability by competing with opportunistic pathogens and contributing to colonization resistance. Together, these microbial adaptations may explain the absence of changes in tight junction expression and calprotectin levels, indicating preserved barrier function. Thus, the nutritional approach tested here appears to offer a biologically robust alternative to pharmacological ZnO, supporting intestinal health, maintaining growth, and contributing to more sustainable pig production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and G.R.; methodology, A.M. and G.R.; validation, A.M. and G.R.; formal analysis, J.A.M. and A.B.G.-G.; investigation, J.A.M.; data curation, A.B.G.-G.; data collection, J.A.M. and A.B.G.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.I.; writing—review and editing, S.I. and G.U.-A.; visualization, G.U.-A.; supervision, A.M., G.R. and G.U.-A. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript, approved the final version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. No financial or material sponsor had any involvement in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript drafting.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The methods of animal handling during research were developed by the ethical principles set out in the European Directive 2008/120/EC, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2008) [13], and in the national legislation, as outlined in Royal Decree 1135/2002, published in the BOE (2002) [14], which establishes the minimum welfare requirements for pigs kept for commercial production, including housing conditions, feeding care, and management practices. These provisions were applied together with the updates and requirements introduced by Royal Decree 159/2023 [15]. Only non-invasive fecal sampling and routine performance monitoring were conducted, in accordance with current animal welfare legislation. The study also complied with the general principles of Royal Decree 53/2013 [16], although no experimental or invasive procedures requiring ethical approval were performed.

Informed Consent Statement

The informed consent was obtained from the owner of the animals involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in the manuscript. Certain data and materials are subject to institutional or legal restrictions and may be available upon request with appropriate approval.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the personnel in the Departamento de Produccion Animal of Murcia University, as well as the Genomics Core at the Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB Pascual Parrilla) for sequencing support.

Conflicts of Interest

Sara Isusi, Guillermo Usero-Alonso and Jose Alberto Murillo are employees of Ingaso Farm. Ingaso Farm provided access to field data and commercial farms but had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation of results, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit this work for publication. The authors declare that these affiliations did not influence the scientific integrity of the study.

References

  1. Luo, Y.; Ren, W.; Smidt, H.; Wright, A.-D.G.; Yu, B.; Schyns, G.; McCormack, U.M.; Cowieson, A.J.; Yu, J.; He, J.; et al. Dynamic distribution of gut Microbiota in pigs at different growth stages: Composition and contribution. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0068821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, C.H.; Xiao, K.; Luan, Z.S.; Song, J. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moeser, A.J.; Pohl, C.S.; Rajput, M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: Implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kapel, N.; Ouni, H.; Benahmed, N.A.; Barbot-Trystram, L. Fecal calprotectin for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2023, 14, e00617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stadnyk, A.W. Cytokine production by epithelial cells. FASEB J. 1994, 8, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parra, J.; Agudelo, J.; Sanín, D.; Forero, J.; Muskus, C.; López Herrera, A. Intestinal expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by oral intake of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from E. coli in weaned pigs. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 2013, 26, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shirkey, T.W.; Siggers, R.H.; Goldade, B.G.; Marshall, J.K.; Drew, M.D.; Laarveld, B.; Van Kessel, A.G. Effects of commensal bacteria on intestinal morphology and expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the gnotobiotic pig. Exp. Biol. Med. 2006, 231, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Ren, E.; Su, Y.; Zhu, W. Co-occurrence of early gut colonization in neonatal piglets with microbiota in the maternal and surrounding delivery environments. Anaerobe 2018, 49, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jacela, J.Y.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Nelssen, J.L.; Renter, D.G.; Dritz, S.S. Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets—Acidifiers and antibiotics. J. Swine Health Prod. 2009, 17, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cai, L.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, B.; Pineda, L.; Li, X.; Jiang, X. Effect of an organic acid blend as an antibiotic alternative on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, intestinal barrier function, and fecal microbiota in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2024, 102, skae149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Barba-Vidal, E.; Martín-Orúe, S.M.; Castillejos, L. Review: Are we using probiotics correctly in post-weaning piglets? Animal 2018, 12, 2489–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, G.; Tao, F.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, B.; Zhan, X. Positive effects of a Clostridium butyricum-based compound probiotic on growth performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology, hypothalamic neurotransmitters, and colonic microbiota in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 2926–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Directiva 2008/120/CE del Consejo de 18 de Diciembre de 2008 Relativa a las Normas Mínimas a la Protección de Cerdos. DOUE-L-2009-80287. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=DOUE-L-2009-80287 (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  14. Real Decreto 1135/2002, de 31 de Octubre, Relativo a las Normas Mínimas Para la Protección de Cerdos. Boletin Oficial del Estado, 20 de Noviembre de 2002. Available online: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2002/10/31/1135/con (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  15. Real Decreto 159/2023, de 7 de Marzo, Por el Que se Establecen Disposiciones Para la Aplicación en España de la Normativa de la Unión Europea Sobre Controles Oficiales en Materia de Bienestar Animal, y se Modifican Varios Reales Decretos. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 8 de Marzo de 2023. Available online: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2023/03/07/159 (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  16. Real decreto 53/2013, de 1 de Febrero, por el que se Establecen las Normas Básicas Aplicables Para la Protección de los Animales Utilizados en Experimentación y Otros Fines Científicos, Incluyendo la Docencia. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 34, de 8 de febrero de 2013. Available online: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2013/02/01/53 (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  17. Ramis, G.; Pérez-Esteruelas, L.; Gómez-Cabrera, C.G.; de Pascual-Monreal, C.; Gonzalez-Guijarro, B.; Párraga-Ros, E.; Sánchez-Uribe, P.; Claver-Mateos, M.; Mendonça-Pascoal, L.; Martínez-Alarcón, L. Oral and parenteral vaccination against Escherichia coli in piglets results in different responses. Animals 2022, 12, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Royaee, A.R.; Husmann, R.J.; Dawson, H.D.; Calzada-Nova, G.; Schnitzlein, W.M.; Zuckermann, F.A.; Lunney, J.K. Deciphering the involvement of innate immune factors in the development of the host response to PRRSV vaccination. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2004, 102, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moue, M.; Tohno, M.; Shimazu, T.; Kido, T.; Aso, H.; Saito, T.; Kitazawa, H. Toll-like receptor 4 and cytokine expression involved in functional immune response in an originally established porcine intestinal epitheliocyte cell line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1780, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Commite for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). In CVMP Meeting Highlights, 13–15 June 2017; EMA/430075/2017; European Medicines Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). Meeting 6–8 December 2016; European Medicines Agency-Science Medicines Health: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 1–5. Available online: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/newa/2016/12/news_detail_002661.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  22. Eriksen, E.Ø.; Kudirkiene, E.; Christensen, A.E.; Agerlin, M.V.; Weber, N.R.; Nødtvedt, A.; Nielsen, J.P.; Hartmann, K.T.; Skade, L.; Larsen, L.E.; et al. Post-weaning diarrhea in pigs weaned without medicinal zinc: Risk factors, pathogen dynamics, and association to growth rate. Porc. Health Manag. 2021, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ferrando, M.L.; Schultsz, C. A hypothetical model of host-pathogen interaction of Streptococcus suis in the gastro-intestinal tract. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Júnior, D.T.V.; de Amorim Rodrigues, G.; Soares, M.H.; Silva, C.B.; Frank, E.O.; Gonzalez-Vega, J.C.; Htoo, J.K.; Brand, H.G.; Silva, B.A.N.; Saraiva, A. Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32540 improves performance and intestinal health of weaned pigs fed diets containing different fiber sources. Livest. Sci. 2023, 270, 105202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, J.; Wang, T.; Xiao, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, F.; Jin, M.; Wang, Y.; Zong, X. Clostridium butyricum ZJU-F1 benefits the intestinal barrier function and immune response associated with its modulation of gut Microbiota in weaned piglets. Cells 2021, 10, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, P.; Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; Guan, W.; Johnston, L.J.; Levesque, C.L.; Fan, P.; He, T.; et al. Dietary Clostridium butyricum induces a phased shift in fecal Microbiota structure and increases the acetic acid-producing bacteria in a weaned piglet model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5157–5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Frese, S.A.; Parker, K.; Calvert, C.C.; Mills, D.A. Diet shapes the gut microbiome of pigs during nursing and weaning. Microbiome 2015, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Megahed, A.; Zeineldin, M.; Evans, K.; Maradiaga, N.; Blair, B.; Aldridge, B.; Lowe, J. Impacts of environmental complexity on respiratory and gut microbiome community structure and diversity in growing pigs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fan, L.; Liu, B.; Han, Z.; Ren, W. Insights into host-microbe interaction: What can we do for the swine industry? Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marcobal, A.; Barboza, M.; Froehlich, J.W.; Block, D.E.; German, J.B.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Mills, D.A. Consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by gut-related microbes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 5334–5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, A.; Yan, X.; Wang, H.; Su, Y.; Zhu, W. Effects of lactic acid bacteria-fermented formula milk supplementation on ileal microbiota, transcriptomic profile, and mucosal immunity in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, H.B.; Borewicz, K.; White, B.A.; Singer, R.S.; Sreevatsan, S.; Tu, Z.J.; Isaacson, R.E. Longitudinal investigation of the age-related bacterial diversity in the feces of commercial pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 153, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mahmud, M.R.; Jian, C.; Uddin, M.K.; Huhtinen, M.; Salonen, A.; Peltoniemi, O.; Venhoranta, H.; Oliviero, C. Impact of intestinal Microbiota on growth performance of suckling and weaned piglets. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0374422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. St-Pierre, B.; Perez Palencia, J.Y.; Samuel, R.S. Impact of early weaning on development of the swine gut microbiome. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Niu, Q.; Pu, G.; Fan, L.; Gao, C.; Lan, T.; Liu, C.; Du, T.; Kim, S.W.; Niu, P.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Identification of gut Microbiota affecting fiber digestibility in pigs. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 4557–4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gresse, R.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Garrido, J.J.; Denis, S.; Jiménez-Marín, A.; Beaumont, M.; Van de Wiele, T.; Forano, E.; Blanquet-Diot, S. Pathogen challenge and dietary shift alter Microbiota composition and activity in a mucin-associated in vitro model of the piglet colon (MPigut-IVM) simulating weaning transition. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 703421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vasquez, R.; Oh, J.K.; Song, J.H.; Kang, D.K. Gut microbiome-produced metabolites in pigs: A review on their biological functions and the influence of probiotics. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2022, 64, 671–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yoshimura, S.; Tsukahara, T.; Takahashi, T.; Miura, H.; Morishima, S.; Kise, M.; Shin, J.; Yahara, Y.; Inoue, R. Causal association between the mucosal and luminal microbiotas from the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets using Bayesian network. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heinzel, S.; Jureczek, J.; Kainulainen, V.; Nieminen, A.I.; Suenkel, U.; von Thaler, A.-K.; Kaleta, C.; Eschweiler, G.W.; Brockmann, K.; Aho, V.T.E.; et al. Elevated fecal calprotectin is associated with gut microbial dysbiosis, altered serum markers and clinical outcomes in older individuals. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shin, J.H.; Tillotson, G.; MacKenzie, T.N.; Warren, C.A.; Wexler, H.M.; Goldstein, E.J.C. Bacteroides and related species: The keystone taxa of the human gut microbiota. Anaerobe 2024, 85, 102819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. de Groot, N.; Fariñas, F.; Cabrera-Gómez, C.G.; Pallares, F.J.; Ramis, G. Weaning causes a prolonged but transient change in immune gene expression in the intestine of piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 99, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mei, J.; Xu, R.-J. Transient changes of transforming growth factor-β expression in the small intestine of the pig in association with weaning. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 93, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xiang, Q.; Wu, X.; Pan, Y.; Wang, L.; Cui, C.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, L.; Peng, J.; Wei, H. Early-life intervention using fecal Microbiota combined with probiotics promotes gut Microbiota maturation, regulates immune system development, and alleviates weaning stress in piglets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ren, Z.; Fan, H.; Deng, H.; Yao, S.; Jia, G.; Zuo, Z.; Hu, Y.; Shen, L.; Ma, X.; Zhong, Z.; et al. Effects of dietary protein level on small intestinal morphology, occludin protein, and bacterial diversity in weaned piglets. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 2168–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Relative abundance of the main bacterial genera identified in fecal samples collected from piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. Bars represent the mean relative abundance (%) of the most predominant genera (≥1% of total sequences in at least one group).
Figure 1. Relative abundance of the main bacterial genera identified in fecal samples collected from piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. Bars represent the mean relative abundance (%) of the most predominant genera (≥1% of total sequences in at least one group).
Animals 15 03422 g001
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of intestinal integrity and inflammatory markers in piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. (A) PCA score plot showing the distribution of individual samples based on gene expression profiles of tight junction (TJ) proteins and inflammatory cytokines. (B) PCA biplot indicating the contribution of each marker to the separation between groups.
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of intestinal integrity and inflammatory markers in piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. (A) PCA score plot showing the distribution of individual samples based on gene expression profiles of tight junction (TJ) proteins and inflammatory cytokines. (B) PCA biplot indicating the contribution of each marker to the separation between groups.
Animals 15 03422 g002
Table 1. Initial feed diets supplied to piglets for each experimental period from weaning to day 14. Values indicate the ingredient composition and nutritional content of the diets provided during each trial.
Table 1. Initial feed diets supplied to piglets for each experimental period from weaning to day 14. Values indicate the ingredient composition and nutritional content of the diets provided during each trial.
Ingredients, %CONTROLTRANSITION0M
Wheat29.9929.9929.99
Maize17.0024.8025.00
Barley15.0015.0015.00
Soybean 4814.005.305.30
Full-fat soybean 4.004.004.00
Mineral and vitamin premix4.004.004.00
Soybean oil 2.181.921.92
Wheat bran2.002.002.00
Blood meal 2.002.002.00
Whey powder fat-filled1.801.801.80
Fish oil 1.251.251.25
Whey powder1.251.251.25
Beetroot pulp1.001.001.00
Sacarose1.001.001.00
Monocalcium phosphate0.850.900.90
Calcium carbonate0.720.760.76
Salt0.500.500.50
Sodium bicarbonate0.320.330.33
Zinc oxide0.310.20-
Lysine0.270.540.54
Threonine0.230.350.35
Methionine0.200.290.29
Tryptophan 0.090.130.13
Valine0.050.200.20
Blend of organic acids 0.300.30
Clostridium butyricum UFC/g 12.5 × 101012.5 × 1010
Chemical compositionCONTROLTRANSITION0M
Crude protein, %19.116.016.0
M. E., Kcal/kg3342.03332.03332.0
Lysine SID1.31.31.3
LysSID/NE, g/MKcal5.25.15.1
Table 2. Primers for tight junction (TJ) proteins, cytokines, and inflammatory indicators used in this study. The table lists the gene name and primer sequences (forward and reverse) employed for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis.
Table 2. Primers for tight junction (TJ) proteins, cytokines, and inflammatory indicators used in this study. The table lists the gene name and primer sequences (forward and reverse) employed for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis.
GeneForwerd PrimerReverse PrimerReference
Calprotectin (S100 calcium binding protein A8)5′-AATTACCACGCCATCTACGC-3′5′-TGATGTCCAG CTCTTTGAACC-3′[17]
Occludin5′-TTGCTGTGAAA ACTCGAAGC-3′5′-CCACTCTCTCCGCATAGTCC-3′[17]
Zonulin 15′-CACAGATGCC
ACAGATGACAG-3′
5′-AGTGATAGCGAACCATGTGC-3′[17]
IFN-γ5′-TGGTAGCTCTGGGAAACTGAATG-3′5′-GGCTTTGCGCTGGATCTG-3′[18]
TGF-β5′-CACGTGGAGCTATACCAGAA-3′5′-TCCGGTGACATCA AAGGACA-3′[19]
Table 3. Comparison of the performance data between the three periods. Values represent the mean and the standard error of the mean (SEM) for each performance parameter (average daily gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate). A total of 491,000 piglets were evaluated across 140 batches distributed in four nursery farms.
Table 3. Comparison of the performance data between the three periods. Values represent the mean and the standard error of the mean (SEM) for each performance parameter (average daily gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate). A total of 491,000 piglets were evaluated across 140 batches distributed in four nursery farms.
LS MeanSEMp-Value
CONTROL
(n = 174,000)
TRANSITION
(n = 105,000)
0M
(n = 212,000)
BW0, kg5.585.475.440.050ns
BW1, kg17.40 a18.99 b18.72 b0.2330.011
ADG, g/day292.28 a300.09 ab307.45 b2.3030.012
FCR1.80 a1.59 b1.58 b0.0290.005
Mortality, %6.48%5.10%5.08%0.0040.089
a,b Means values within a row with different superscripts differ. ns: not significant.
Table 4. Differences in bacterial species between pre-weaning and post-weaning periods. Values represent the mean relative abundance of the most predominant bacterial species identified in fecal samples. Analyses were conducted at the species level, including taxa with ≥1% relative abundance in at least one group.
Table 4. Differences in bacterial species between pre-weaning and post-weaning periods. Values represent the mean relative abundance of the most predominant bacterial species identified in fecal samples. Analyses were conducted at the species level, including taxa with ≥1% relative abundance in at least one group.
Family/Genera/SpeciesLS MeanSEMp-Value
PRE-WEANINGPOST-WEANING
Desulfovibrionaceae/Bilophila
     B. wadsworthia0.1350.0220.016<0.001
Desulfovibrionaceae/Desulfovibrio
     D. piger0.0070.0080.0020.021
Lactobacillaceae/Lactobacillus
     L. reuteri0.0070.0170.0030.021
Eubacteriaceae/Eubacterium
     E. coprostanoligenes0.0420.0120.0070.045
     E. biforme0.0050.0180.0030.016
Oscillospiraceae/Faecalibacterium
     F. prausnitzii0.1700.1000.0130.017
Oscillospiraceae/Ruminoccus
     R. bromii0.0030.0240.0040.009
     R. faecis0.0020.0000.000<0.001
Prevotellaceae/Prevotella
     P. copri0.0450.0930.0160.224
Lachnospiraceae/Roseburia
     R. faecis0.0170.0210.0050.425
Clostridiaceae/Clostridium
     Cl. butyricum0.0050.0150.0040.279
Rikenellaceae/Alistipes
     A. shahii0.0090.0010.0020.012
Table 5. Expression of intestinal integrity markers in piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. Values represent the mean relative expression and standard error of the mean for each target gene. Analyses included TJ proteins (occludin and zonulin) and biomarkers of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin, INF-γ and TGF-β).
Table 5. Expression of intestinal integrity markers in piglets at day 0 (pre-weaning) and day 14 (post-weaning) during the 0M period. Values represent the mean relative expression and standard error of the mean for each target gene. Analyses included TJ proteins (occludin and zonulin) and biomarkers of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin, INF-γ and TGF-β).
Intestinal MarkerLS MeanSEMp-Value
PRE-WEANINGPOST-WEANING
CALP_LOG211.12913.0900.8040.227
OCLD_LOG28.0247.2500.4130.430
ZON1_LOG27.3736.8570.4630.673
IFNg_LOG215.50710.0160.7160.002
TGFB_LOG210.3474.8170.409<0.001
Table 6. Correlation between bacterial species showing significant differences between groups and intestinal integrity markers in piglets. The table presents Pearson’s correlation coefficients (ρ) between the relative abundance of bacterial taxa and the expression levels of TJ proteins (occludin and zonulin) and biomarkers of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin, IFN-γ and TGF-β).
Table 6. Correlation between bacterial species showing significant differences between groups and intestinal integrity markers in piglets. The table presents Pearson’s correlation coefficients (ρ) between the relative abundance of bacterial taxa and the expression levels of TJ proteins (occludin and zonulin) and biomarkers of intestinal inflammation (calprotectin, IFN-γ and TGF-β).
Bacterial SpeciesCalprotectinOccludinZonulinIFNγTGFβSignificance
(p-Value)
Eubacterium_biforme−0.289−0.1480.075−0.2380.6390.070
Alistipes_shahii−0.232−0.207−0.0470.263−0.274ns
Lactobacillus_reuteri0.161−0.330−0.052−0.0180.0010.087
Prevotella_copri−0.205−0.0350.0170.0440.286ns
Bilophila_wadsworthia−0.0480.1380.1250.4210.3800.093
Desulfovibrio_piger0.2340.407−0.1790.3430.0850.032
Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes0.223−0.037−0.1200.145−0.373ns
Roseburia_faecis0.2910.113−0.2360.075−0.0640.069
Faecalibacterium_prausnitzii−0.1520.2700.4460.2500.5840.033
Clostridium_butyricum0.0520.1140.1050.192-ns
Ruminococcus_faecis−0.026−0.2390.0030.2400.8280.006
Ruminococcus_bromii−0.249−0.193−0.052−0.269-ns
Bacteroides_fragilis0.3420.2770.029-−0.3740.031
Values in bold have significant correlations. ns: not significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Isusi, S.; Usero-Alonso, G.; Murillo, J.A.; Gonzalez-Guijarro, A.B.; Muñoz, A.; Ramis, G. Influence of Nutritional Strategies on Performance, Gut Barrier Function and Microbiota Composition in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2025, 15, 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233422

AMA Style

Isusi S, Usero-Alonso G, Murillo JA, Gonzalez-Guijarro AB, Muñoz A, Ramis G. Influence of Nutritional Strategies on Performance, Gut Barrier Function and Microbiota Composition in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2025; 15(23):3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Isusi, Sara, Guillermo Usero-Alonso, Jose Alberto Murillo, Ana Belén Gonzalez-Guijarro, Antonio Muñoz, and Guillermo Ramis. 2025. "Influence of Nutritional Strategies on Performance, Gut Barrier Function and Microbiota Composition in Weaned Piglets" Animals 15, no. 23: 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233422

APA Style

Isusi, S., Usero-Alonso, G., Murillo, J. A., Gonzalez-Guijarro, A. B., Muñoz, A., & Ramis, G. (2025). Influence of Nutritional Strategies on Performance, Gut Barrier Function and Microbiota Composition in Weaned Piglets. Animals, 15(23), 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop