Next Article in Journal
Alterations in Lipid Metabolism and Hepatopancreatic Lipidomics Induced by Microcystin-LR Exposure in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Owner-Assessed Feline Acute Pain Scale: Validation and Agreement with Veterinary Scales
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 15
Issue 19
10.3390/ani15192802
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity and Distribution of Deep-Sea Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual and Acoustic Surveys

by
Liang Fang
1,2,*,
Xinxing Wang
1,2,
Yujian Chen
2,
Yuezhong Wang
2,
Xinrui Long
3,
Wentao Lu
3,
Hancheng Zhao
3,
Zhao Zhen
3,
Kunhuan Li
3,
Qilin Gutang
3 and
Tao Chen
1,2,*
1
Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572000, China
2
South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510300, China
3
Marine Biology Institute, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(19), 2802; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192802
Submission received: 2 August 2025 / Revised: 18 September 2025 / Accepted: 22 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Cetaceans serve a critical role in deep-sea ecosystems. However, the challenging environmental conditions and limited funding have led to a significant lack of data on the species diversity of deep-sea cetaceans. This study combined visual and acoustic survey methods to investigate whales and dolphins in the deep-water regions of the northern South China Sea. The findings reveal remarkably high cetacean biodiversity in these areas. Nonetheless, cetaceans in the South China Sea are facing severe anthropogenic pressures, including fishing activities, shipping traffic, and oil and gas exploration. Establishing and enforcing robust conservation policies is imperative to ensure the long-term survival of whales and dolphins in this region.

Abstract

Cetaceans are essential for maintaining the balance and stability of deep-sea ecosystems. However, environmental challenges and limited funding have resulted in a marked lack of data on species diversity and the conservation status of deep-sea cetaceans. In this study, we undertook two research expeditions in the deep-water regions of the northern South China Sea, employing an integrated visual and acoustic survey approach. In total, 28 cetacean encounters, involving 12 species and more than 1000 individuals, were documented through visual observation, while acoustic monitoring recorded 53 detections. These findings demonstrate that the deep-sea waters of the northern South China Sea have relatively high cetacean biodiversity and constitute significant habitats for these marine mammals. Nevertheless, this area also experiences intensive human activities, with fisheries, maritime traffic, and oil and gas extraction posing primary threats to local cetacean populations. Improving the management of human activities in this marine zone is essential for ensuring the effective protection of cetacean species and their critical habitats.

1. Introduction

Marine mammals are recognized as flagship species in marine ecosystems and are critical for maintaining the biodiversity and stability of marine environments [1,2,3]. However, the unique behavioral patterns of cetacean species and the high costs of marine surveys mean that most deep-dwelling marine mammals remain insufficiently studied [4]. Given the rapid pace of ocean exploitation and development, population surveys and distribution mapping of marine mammals are essential for species conservation and the protection of biodiversity in their respective habitats [5,6,7,8]. While coastal cetaceans have received relatively substantial research attention, offshore and deep-sea cetacean species have long been understudied due to environmental challenges and funding limitations, as well as their elusive behavior [9].
Deep-sea cetaceans play a vital role in ocean ecosystems [10]. When a whale dies, its massive carcass sinks to the seafloor and becomes a vital nutrient source for these ecosystems, a process known as “whale fall”. Decomposition can persist for decades, providing food and habitats for deep-sea organisms [11,12,13]. Furthermore, deep-sea cetaceans enhance the “biological pump” effect through vertical migration activities, such as diving to hunt and returning to the surface to breathe, which contributes to carbon transfer from surface waters to the deep ocean [14,15]. Additionally, cetacean excrement, rich in iron and nitrogen, stimulates phytoplankton growth, indirectly boosting the ocean’s carbon sequestration capacity [16,17,18,19]. Through their migratory and predatory behaviors, cetaceans influence prey distribution via their effect on fish and cephalopod populations, thereby maintaining the stability of marine food webs [19,20,21].
The South China Sea supports relatively high cetacean diversity, with 30 cetacean species documented in the region based on stranding data [22,23]. However, vast areas of its waters remain data-deficient zones in cetacean research. The lack of population data on dolphins and whales in these waters severely hampers effective conservation and management efforts. Recent research expeditions focusing on cetaceans in key areas of the northern and middle South China Sea have indicated that species richness is exceptionally high in the surveyed regions [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Nevertheless, the South China Sea is subject to intensive human activities, serving as a key international shipping route, major fishing ground, and significant zone for offshore oil and gas exploration [30]. Rising anthropogenic pressures, such as maritime traffic, overfishing, and resource extraction, are increasingly threatening the survival of these species [31]. Addressing these threats requires urgent, species-specific research and robust data collection to guide evidence-based conservation policies and mitigate the risks to marine biodiversity.
Which cetaceans are distributed in the deep-sea waters of the northern South China Sea, and what threats do they face? This is an important issue that requires focused attention against the backdrop of the South China Sea’s rapid development and utilization. Visual and acoustic survey methods are the most widely employed approaches in cetacean research for assessing population sizes and habitat distributions [32,33,34,35,36]. Conducting cetacean surveys in the South China Sea is essential for understanding and advancing the conservation of marine biodiversity in the region. The objectives of this study were to investigate and document the diversity and distribution patterns of deep-sea cetaceans in the northern South China Sea, evaluate their conservation status under existing threats, and provide foundational data to support the development of management and protection strategies by the relevant authorities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey Area

The research area was located in the deep waters of the northern South China Sea (Figure 1). With depths reaching nearly 4000 m and averaging over 3500 m, it is one of the deepest areas in this body of water. This area lies in a major maritime traffic artery with the Taiwan Strait to the north and the Bashi Channel, both of which are important trade channels connecting the South China Sea with the Pacific Ocean, and shipping activities are very frequent. The northern part of the South China Sea is an important area for fishing and oil and gas production, and thus experiences intense human activities.

2.2. Visual Survey

For the visual survey, the standard line transect survey method was adopted and was designed according to the principles of distance sampling. A 300-ton iron-hulled vessel served as the research platform, with the ship’s top, standing at approximately 8 m above water level, serving as an observation deck. At any one time, the observation team consisted of three members, namely, two primary observers and one data recorder. The two primary observers were responsible for scanning both port and starboard sectors forward of the beam using 7 × 50 Fujinon binoculars (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan), while the recorder documented sighting events and conducted supplementary naked-eye observations. The personnel were rotated every 20 min to prevent fatigue, with the full observation team comprising eight members, all possessing extensive cetacean observation experience. The vessel maintained a cruising speed of 6–8 knots during operations. Daily observations commenced at 07:30 h and concluded at 19:00 h. When cetaceans were sighted, the recorder documented the species, time, group size, global positioning system (GPS) coordinates, animal-vessel distance, sea state, angle, and water depth. Simultaneously, the vessel decelerated to approach the cetaceans for photographic documentation.

2.3. Passive Acoustic Survey

For the acoustic survey, an autonomous miniature stereo acoustic event data logger (A-tag, ML200-AS2; Marine Micro Technology, Saitama, Japan) was employed. This acoustic recorder has been extensively used for detecting the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) during both mobile and stationary surveys [37,38,39]. Detailed specifications of the A-tag are provided in Akamatsu et al. [38]. The towed-type A-tag comprised two external ultrasonic hydrophones, a preamplifier (+60 dB), a band-pass filter (55–235 kHz), 128 MB of flash memory, and batteries. Each hydrophone had peak sensitivity at approximately 120 kHz (210 dB re 1 V/μPa), with a frequency response of 100–160 kHz within 5 dB. The hydrophones were spaced 17 cm apart. The data logger had a dynamic range of 129–157 dB (peak-to-peak, re 1 μPa). The detection range was highly dependent on the clicks emitted by animals and the level of background noise. As a reference, Akamatsu et al. [38] reported a detection range of approximately 300 m for the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River. During the survey, the A-tag was towed approximately 100 m behind the survey boat using a nylon rope. Two iron bars (approximately 500 g each) were attached to the front of the A-tag to submerge the device and minimize surface noise interference. The A-tag working start time was manually set and synchronized with a GPS (eTrex 30×; Garmin, Schaffhausen, Switzerland).

2.4. Acoustic Data Analysis

A-tag data were processed using a customized program developed in Igor Pro 5.01 software (WaveMetrics, Portland, OR, USA). The extracted pulse event data comprised the sound pressure level (SPL) of the pulse, the time difference (TD) in pulse arrival between the two hydrophones, and the inter-click interval (ICI). These parameters can be used to identify vocalizations and track individuals. The SPL, TD, and ICI data are illustrated in Figure 2. Cetacean echolocation typically involves sequences of high-intensity clicks, known as click trains, ranging from several to hundreds of pulses, with ICIs spanning milliseconds to tens of milliseconds. Given that the survey boat was moving faster than the swimming cetaceans, the TD values corresponding to pulses from a vocalizing animal passing the A-tag exhibited a characteristic pattern. As the animal passed by the A-tag, the bearing angle changed, causing the TD to shift from positive to negative values (Figure 2). This shift generated a distinct trace in the TD plot, representing the passage of an individual animal. The detection time of the animal was defined as the point at which the TD was nearly equal to zero, and this time point was used to identify the position of the detected animal by matching it with the corresponding GPS track of the survey routine. While the vessel was moving, acoustic detections occurring within a 10 min interval were considered part of the same detection event. If the survey boat was following the animals, the entire tracking time constituted a single detection event.

2.5. Data Analysis

The position of visual and acoustic detections was presented by ArcMap version 10.3. Statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS (version 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with the significance level set at p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Visual Sightings of Cetaceans

This study encompassed two surveys. The first was conducted from 25 March to 7 April 2024, lasted 13 days, and covered 2156 km; the second voyage was undertaken between 15 August and 27 August 2024, lasting 12 days and spanning 1859 km. During the visual expedition, 28 cetacean sighting events were recorded, with 27 involving toothed whales and 1 a baleen whale (Table 1) covering 2739 km. The encounter rate of cetaceans is 1.02 per 100 km. The positions of these visual sightings are shown in Figure 3. The largest toothed whale species encountered was the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). The most frequently encountered and numerically abundant species was the pantropical spotted dolphin (Stenella attenuata). Pantropical spotted dolphins, Risso’s dolphins (Grampus griseus), pilot whales (Globicephala spp.), and Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) were consistently observed in large groups, typically exceeding 50 individuals. Additionally, two sightings of groups of the relatively rare beaked whales (Ziphiidae) were documented, each group consisting of four individuals. In 10 sightings, the cetacean species could not be identified due to the small group size and the short surfacing durations.
Of the 28 cetacean sightings, only 2 were recorded at depths < 500 m (Figure 4). The shallowest occurrence involved Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera brydei) at a depth of approximately 120 m. Most sightings (75%) were at depths between 3500 and 4000 m.

3.2. Acoustic Survey Detection

In the acoustic survey, a total of 52 acoustic events were detected, of which 14 were confirmed by both visual and acoustic methods. During the first survey, 23 cetacean vocalizations were detected. Eighteen acoustic signals occurred in daylight (06:00–19:00 h), while five were recorded at night (19:00–06:00 h), with the vessel under navigation throughout the night. In the second survey, 30 cetacean acoustic signals were identified, comprising 21 daytime detections (06:00–19:00 h) and 9 nocturnal ones (19:00–06:00 h). In this survey, the vessel engine was shut down at night. The data concerning the acoustic detection of cetaceans is presented in Table 2, and the locations of the detections are depicted in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

4.1. Cetacean Diversity in the Deep-Sea Area of the Northern South China Sea

Although several studies have recently been conducted on cetaceans in the South China Sea, relevant information remains scarce [18,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The growing anthropogenic pressures in this region make it an urgent task to assess the diversity and conservation status of local whales and dolphins for developing effective conservation strategies [31]. In this study, we investigated cetacean diversity in waters nearly 4000 m deep in the northern South China Sea through integrated visual and acoustic surveys. The findings revealed remarkably rich cetacean biodiversity in this deep-sea area, with the pantropical spotted dolphin, Risso’s dolphin, pilot whales, and beaked whales being the most frequently encountered species. The pantropical spotted dolphin was the most frequently encountered and numerically dominant cetacean species, with large groups sighted during both survey voyages. This species exhibits one of the highest bycatch rates among cetaceans in the South China Sea—likely linked to its feeding ecology, particularly in fisheries using vessels with light attraction and drift nets [40,41,42]. Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus), a cosmopolitan species, was also regularly observed during the surveys. This species exhibits a broad global distribution, primarily inhabiting tropical and temperate waters [43]. Within the Indo-Pacific region, it is frequently reported in the waters east of Taiwan, predominantly occurring at depths between 300 and 1500 m [44]. Previous surveys in the South China Sea have also documented sightings of this species [28,29]. The short-finned pilot whale (Globicephala macrorhynchus), a large cetacean commonly sighted in the South China Sea, was repeatedly documented by Liu et al. [27]. Current research indicates that this population does not undergo long-distance migration, suggesting that the South China Sea may constitute a critical regional habitat [27]. Accordingly, this resident species should be prioritized in regional conservation strategies. Previous studies suggest that during the spring internal tide period, large-amplitude internal waves develop in the Luzon Strait between Taiwan and the Philippine archipelago in the South China Sea. These waves sink near the Dongsha Plateau, uplifting nutrients and plankton to the upper ocean layers, potentially attracting pilot whales to forage in this region [45]. Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus), the largest species encountered in this survey, remain understudied in Asian waters despite frequent stranding records along China’s coast, including the South China Sea [26,46]. Liu et al. [23] proposed that the South China Sea represents a potential calving ground for sperm whales, based on a synthesis of multiple survey datasets. This possibility was reinforced by our direct observation of a cow-calf pair within a sperm whale group in the present survey. Furthermore, fisheries resource assessments show that purpleback flying squid (Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis) are abundantly present in these waters [47], and could thus provide a reliable prey base to support the local sperm whale population. Bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera edeni) were the only baleen whales sighted. Although strandings of these animals are frequently reported in the South China Sea and adjacent waters, their movement patterns remain poorly understood. While a seasonal aggregation is known to occur in the Beibu Gulf of Guangxi from October to approximately May, their whereabouts during other periods are unknown [48,49,50]. Recent sightings in Hong Kong and Shenzhen waters suggest that eastern Hainan and Guangdong coasts are important distribution areas for this species [51]. Studies have identified high cetacean diversity near the Zhongsha Islands, further confirming the rich abundance and diversity of whales and dolphins throughout the South China Sea [28,29].

4.2. Comparison Between the Visual and Acoustic Surveys

The acoustic survey in this study demonstrated superior detection efficacy compared to the visual survey, with a total of 53 detection events recorded. Acoustic techniques proved more effective in detecting cetacean presence overall. However, under favorable sea conditions, visual surveys still offer advantages in detecting animals at greater distances and in identifying specific species. The passive acoustic system employed in this study had an operational bandwidth of 55–235 kHz. This frequency range may exclude lower-frequency acoustic signals, such as sperm whale echolocation clicks, which exhibit peak frequencies below 20 kHz [52,53,54]; false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) and pilot whale clicks, where peak energy typically occurs below 50 kHz [55,56,57,58]; and most beaked whale clicks, which predominantly feature peak frequencies under 60 kHz [59,60,61].
Visual and acoustic surveys are the most commonly used methods for investigating offshore cetaceans and have long been widely applied in offshore cetacean survey practices. Within the 7.8 million km2 study area of the eastern temperate North Pacific, sperm whale abundance was acoustically estimated, with 45 distinct groups being localized. Acoustic technology proved capable of detecting the slow “clicks” produced by sperm whales from greater distances (up to 37 km). By extending the detection range and enabling nocturnal monitoring, acoustic technology significantly increased the number of sperm whales detected during line-transect surveys; nevertheless, visual observations remain essential for estimating group size [36]. Acoustic and visual surveys conducted in Gwaii Haanas demonstrated strong complementarity in detecting the presence and activity patterns of cetaceans, jointly identifying multiple species, while each method uniquely recorded others. However, both methods faced limitations with unidentified observations and vocalizations [62]. Considering the extended periods deep-diving animals spend submerged, we propose that acoustic surveys be used as an alert tool to guide visual surveys. This approach would significantly boost the animal detection rate during visual survey operations, which is of critical importance for identifying species, determining group size, and assessing population abundance.

4.3. Threats

As deep offshore waters lie beyond the public eye, the conditions and threats faced by cetaceans (whales and dolphins) in these remote marine areas often tend to be overlooked. The major threats to cetaceans in the deep offshore waters of the South China Sea include fishing activities, shipping, and oil and gas extraction.

4.3.1. Fishing Activities

The South China Sea accounts for approximately 12% of global marine catches, ranking among the world’s top five fishing grounds. It hosts approximately 55% of global marine fishing vessels and serves as a primary fishing zone for neighboring countries/regions [63]. Marine fisheries hold historical significance in this region, with most bordering nations being major fishing producers and home to one-third of the world’s fishing population. Since the 1970s, marine fisheries have remained vital to these economies [64,65]. However, advancements in fishing gear, practices, and high-powered vessels have led to severe overcapacity, particularly in coastal waters. Fishing intensity now far exceeds sustainable yields, resulting in widespread overfishing [66,67]. Destructive methods, including bottom trawls, fine-meshed nets, and blast/electro-fishing, have degraded marine habitats and decimated fish stocks, driving resource depletion [68]. Over-fishing not only destroys marine ecosystems but also leads to a sharp decline in cetacean food sources. Additionally, these fishing operations result in a large number of cetaceans being caught as bycatch [24,41,42].

4.3.2. Shipping

The South China Sea is one of the world’s busiest maritime regions. However, assessing the impact of its intensive shipping activities on cetaceans (whales and dolphins) remains challenging due to a lack of baseline ecological data. The primary impacts of shipping on pelagic cetaceans are underwater noise pollution and vessel collisions. These marine mammals rely heavily on acoustic signals for navigation, foraging, and social interactions, and ship noise masks their echolocation and communication frequencies, leading to failed prey detection and interrupted group coordination [69,70,71,72,73,74]. The disruption of cetacean sonar and communication systems by vessel noise has been documented globally; for example, in the North Sea, shipping noise was reported to cause hearing threshold shifts in cetaceans, forcing some species to alter migration routes to avoid acoustically degraded zones [75]. Arctic narwhals exhibit extreme noise sensitivity, performing rapid deep dives and ceasing social behaviors when vessels approach within 5 km. Importantly, these stress responses can accelerate energy depletion [76]. Vessel collisions are a leading cause of mortality for pelagic cetaceans. Approximately 45% of humpback whale deaths along the Atlantic coast are directly linked to ship strikes or propeller injuries [77], while annual collision mortality reached 4% for beluga whales in Canada’s St. Lawrence River [78].

4.3.3. Oil and Gas Extraction

The impacts of current offshore oil and gas exploration and extraction activities in the South China Sea on cetaceans have long been overlooked due to a severe lack of assessment of these effects. The South China Sea is a regionally significant sea with relatively rich hydrocarbon resources; however, most of these resources are located in waters exceeding 500 m in depth [79,80]. As oil and gas operations advance into deeper waters, cetaceans inhabiting these marine zones are inevitably exposed to impacts from exploration and production activities [81,82]. In oil and gas exploration, seismic survey technology relies on airgun arrays, which emit high-intensity sound waves exceeding 200 dB re µPa every 10–12 s, lasting for weeks to months. This noise, comparable to underwater explosions, can propagate thousands of kilometers, severely disrupting cetaceans’ sound-dependent navigation, foraging, and reproductive activities [83,84,85,86,87]. In the Gulf of Mexico, it was shown that airgun noise reduced the foraging efficiency of sperm whales by 20% [88] and, regarding the responses elicited, both the received level and proximity to the source were reported to be important [89]. Meanwhile, oil and gas leaks can result in direct mortality or long-term physiological effects on marine cetaceans; for example, oil coating the bodies of dolphins led to thermoregulation failure and vision impairment, in addition to the toxin entry into the food chain [82,90].

4.4. Conservation and Management

Measures for enhancing the conservation and management of cetacean populations should include the following:
  • Prioritize comprehensive cetacean surveys in the South China Sea to document population size, distribution patterns, conservation status, and anthropogenic threats, particularly for large-bodied species or mass aggregations.
  • Strengthen conservation management frameworks by addressing impacts from fisheries, maritime traffic, and oil resource extraction. Current impact assessments remain inadequate. Consequently, enacting dedicated legislation for cetacean protection will empower law enforcement against violations.
  • Promote sustainable fisheries practices critical for long-term cetacean survival. This reduces bycatch and entanglement (e.g., from drift nets and purse seines, which are primary causes of non-natural mortality), while safeguarding prey resources and restoring fish stocks.
  • Intensify conservation outreach to deepen understanding among government agencies and public stakeholders regarding urgent threats and the imperative for immediate protection measures.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated cetaceans in the deep-sea region of the northern South China Sea through two surveys employing visual and passive acoustic methods. During the expedition, 28 cetacean sighting events were recorded, with 27 involving toothed whales and 1 a baleen whale. In the acoustic survey, a total of 52 events were detected, of which 14 were confirmed by both visual and acoustic methods. The results indicate that the deep-sea waters in the northern South China Sea host exceptionally rich cetacean biodiversity and serve as critical habitats for these marine mammals. Considering the growing human activities in the South China Sea, we propose implementing measures such as conducting additional scientific expeditions, enhancing habitat management, promoting sustainable fisheries development, and strengthening international cooperation to protect cetaceans in this region.

Author Contributions

Methodology, L.F., T.C. and X.W.; Field survey, K.L., Q.G., Y.C., Y.W., X.L., W.L., H.Z. and Z.Z.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.F.; Writing—review and editing, L.F. and T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Hainan Provincial Science and Technology Plan in the Science and Technology Innovation Joint Project of the Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (2021CXLH0004), Natural Science Foundation of China (32202937, 42230413), National Key Research and Development Project of China (2024YFD2401402).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, as the sighting and photo-identification and passive acoustic survey do not involve any direct contact with the animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Please contact the primary author for data requests.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the contributions and support for the wild work from the staff on the Nanfeng and YueYuzhi boats.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

GPSGlobal positioning system
ICIInter-click interval
SPLSound pressure level
TDTime difference

References

  1. Kalinkat, G.; Cabral, J.S.; Darwall, W.; Ficetola, G.F.; Fisher, J.L.; Giling, D.P.; Gosselin, M.; Grossart, H.; Jähnig, S.C.; Jeschke, J.M. Flagship Umbrella Species Needed for the Conservation of Overlooked Aquatic Biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2017, 31, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. di Sciara, G.N.; Hoyt, E.; Reeves, R.; Ardron, J.; Marsh, H.; Vongraven, D.; Barr, B. Place-based Approaches to Marine Mammal Conservation. Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2016, 26, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moore, S.E. Marine Mammals as Ecosystem Sentinels. J. Mammal. 2008, 89, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kaschner, K.; Tittensor, D.P.; Ready, J.; Gerrodette, T.; Worm, B. Current and Future Patterns of Global Marine Mammal Biodiversity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roman, J.; Altman, I.; Dunphy-Daly, M.M.; Campbell, C.; Jasny, M.; Read, A.J. The Marine Mammal Protection Act at 40: Status, Recovery, and Future of U.S. Marine Mammals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1286, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nelms, S.; Alfaro-Shigueto, J.; Arnould, J.; Avila, I.; Bengtson Nash, S.; Campbell, E.; Carter, M.; Collins, T.; Currey, R.; Domit, C. Marine Mammal Conservation: Over the Horizon. Endang. Species Res. 2021, 44, 291–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bailey, H.; Thompson, P. Using Marine Mammal Habitat Modelling to Identify Priority Conservation Zones Within a Marine Protected Area. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 378, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gormley, A.M.; Slooten, E.; Dawson, S.; Barker, R.J.; Rayment, W.; du Fresne, S.; Bräger, S. First Evidence That Marine Protected Areas Can Work for Marine Mammals. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pompa, S.; Ehrlich, P.R.; Ceballos, G. Global Distribution and Conservation of Marine Mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 13600–13605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bowen, W. Role of Marine Mammals in Aquatic Ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 158, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Smith, C.R.; Glover, A.G.; Treude, T.; Higgs, N.D.; Amon, D.J. Whale-fall Ecosystems: Recent Insights into Ecology, Paleoecology, and Evolution. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2015, 7, 571–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, Y.; Lei, N.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W. Review of the Impact of Whale Fall on Biodiversity in Deep-sea Ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 885572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Smith, C.R.; Baco, A.R. Ecology of Whale Falls at the Deep-Sea Floor. In Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review; Gibson, R.N., Atkinson, R.J.A., Gordon, J.D.M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; Volume 41, pp. 311–354. [Google Scholar]
  14. Roman, J.; Estes, J.A.; Morissette, L.; Smith, C.; Costa, D.; McCarthy, J.; Nation, J.; Nicol, S.; Pershing, A.; Smetacek, V. Whales as Marine Ecosystem Engineers. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roman, J.; McCarthy, J.J. The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wing, S.; Jack, L.; Shatova, O.; Leichter, J.; Barr, D.; Frew, R.; Gault-Ringold, M. Seabirds and Marine Mammals Redistribute Bioavailable Iron in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 510, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Le Mézo, P.K.; Galbraith, E.D. The Fecal Iron Pump: Global Impact of Animals on the Iron Stoichiometry of Marine Sinking Particles. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2021, 66, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Woodstock, M.S.; Kiszka, J.J.; Ramírez-León, M.R.; Sutton, T.T.; Fennel, K.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y. Cetacean-mediated Vertical Nitrogen Transport in the Oceanic Realm. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2023, 68, 2445–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gilbert, L.; Jeanniard-du-Dot, T.; Authier, M.; Chouvelon, T.; Spitz, J. Composition of Cetacean Communities Worldwide Shapes Their Contribution to Ocean Nutrient Cycling. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ainley, D.; Ballard, G.; Blight, L.K.; Ackley, S.; Emslie, S.D.; Lescroël, A.; Olmastroni, S.; Townsend, S.E.; Tynan, C.T.; Wilson, P. Impacts of Cetaceans on the Structure of Southern Ocean Food Webs. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2010, 26, 482–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barlow, J.; Kahru, M.; Mitchell, B. Cetacean Biomass, Prey Consumption, and Primary Production Requirements in the California Current Ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 371, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, P. Chinese Cetaceans; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, M.; Lin, M.; Li, S. Species Diversity and Spatiotemporal Patterns Based on Cetacean Stranding Records in China, 1950–2018. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, M.; Liu, M.; Turvey, S.T.; Li, S. An Interview-based Investigation of Marine Megafauna Bycatch in the Northern South China Sea. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 286, 110297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, W.; Kang, H.; Seim, I.; Liu, B.; Chen, S.; Liu, M.; Dong, L.; Lin, M.; Song, Y.; Ouyang, M. The First Genetically Confirmed Live Sighting of the Deraniyagala’s Beaked Whale (Mesoplodon hotaula), with Insights into the Diversity, Phylogeny, and Past Demographic History. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2025, 41, 13180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, M.; Lin, W.; Lin, M.; Caruso, F.; Rosso, M.; Zhang, P.; Dong, L.; Dai, L.; Li, S. Sperm Whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Northern South China Sea: Evidence of a Nursing Ground? Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2022, 184, 103767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, M.; Lin, W.; Lin, M.; Dong, L.; Li, S. Short-finned Pilot Whales in the South China Sea: Insights into Regional Distribution, Movement Pattern, and Habitat Characteristics. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2024, 40, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, M.; Liu, M.; Caruso, F.; Rosso, M.; Tang, X.; Dong, L.; Lin, W.; Borroni, A.; Bocconcelli, A.; Dai, L. A Pioneering Survey of Deep-Diving and Offshore Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea. Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Deng, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Lin, B.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, M.; Lin, W.; Lin, M.; Dong, L.; Kang, H. Distribution Pattern of Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual Surveys and Environmental DNA Metabarcoding. Conserv. Biol. 2025, e70060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhong, H.; White, M. South China Sea: Its Importance for Shipping, Trade, Energy and Fisheries. Asia-Pac. J. Ocean Law Policy 2017, 2, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, S.; Lin, M.; Caruso, F.; Dong, L.; Lin, W.; Rosso, M.; Bocconcelli, A. Cetaceans Under Threat in South China Sea. Science 2020, 368, 1074–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boisseau, O.; Matthews, J.; Gillespie, D.; Lacey, C.; Moscrop, A.; Ouamari, N.E. A Visual and Acoustic Survey for Harbour Porpoises Off North-west Africa: Further Evidence of a Discrete Population. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2007, 29, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Moore, S.E.; Dahlheim, M.E.; Stafford, K.M.; Fox, C.G.; Braham, H.W.; Mcdonald, M.A.; Thomason, J. Acoustic and Visual Detection of Large Whales in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC 1999, 107, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  34. Simard, P.; Wall, C.C.; Allen, J.B.; Wells, R.S.; Gowans, S.; Forys, E.A. Dolphin Distribution on the West Florida Shelf Using Visual Surveys and Passive Acoustic Monitoring. Aquat. Mamm. 2015, 41, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Clark, C.W.; Brown, M.W.; Corkeron, P. Visual and Acoustic Surveys for North Atlantic Right Whales, Eubalaena Glacialis. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2001, 26, 837–854. [Google Scholar]
  36. Barlow, J.; Taylor, B.L. Estimates of Sperm Whale Abundance in the Northeastern Temperate Pacific from a Combined Acoustic and Visual Survey. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2005, 21, 429–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, S.; Akamatsu, T.; Dong, L.; Wang, K.; Wang, D.; Kimura, S. Widespread Passive Acoustic Detection of Yangtze Finless Porpoise Using Miniature Stereo Acoustic Data-loggers: A Review. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 128, 1476–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Akamatsu, T.; Wang, D.; Wang, K.; Wei, Z.; Naito, Y. A Passive Acoustical Survey Method of Finless Porpoises. Fish. Sci. 2002, 68, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. Kimura, S.; Akamatsu, T.; Wang, K.; Wang, D.; Li, S.; Dong, S.; Arai, N. Comparison of Stationary Acoustic Monitoring and Visual Observation of Finless Porpoises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Fu, B.; Xie, L.; Yan, L. Acoustic Deterrent of Pantropical Spotted Dolphins (Stenella attenuata) from Light-falling Net Fisheries in the South China Sea. J. Fish. Sci. China 2021, 28, 348–354. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, T.; Li, J.; Yan, L.; Xie, B.; Zhang, P.; Song, Z.; Li, M.; Fu, W.; Zhang, Y. A Field Trial to Study the Effects of Stenella attenuata Deterrent on the Catch of a Light-falling Net Fishery. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, G.; Zhou, X.; Xu, Q.; Leatherwood, S. A Survey on the Incidental Catches of Small Cetaceans in Coastal Waters of China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 1999, 10, 713–716. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jefferson, T.A.; Weir, C.R.; Anderson, R.C.; Ballance, L.T.; Kenney, R.D.; Kiszka, J.J. Global Distribution Ofrisso’s Dolphin Grampus griseus: A Review and Critical Evaluation. Mamm. Rev. 2014, 44, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hsin-Yi, Y.; Ching-Yi, L.; Wen-Jyh, Y.; Lien-Siang, C. Distribution of Risso’s Dolphin (Grampus griseus) in the East-central Coastal Waters of Taiwan Based on Whale-Watching Records. Taiwania 2019, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moore, S.E.; Lien, R. Pilot Whales Follow Internal Solitary Waves in the South China Sea. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2007, 23, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, M.; Lin, M.; Li, S. Sperm Whales in the Waters Off China: A Glimpse of the Past and Present. Water Biol. Secur. 2023, 2, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jun, Z.; Yongsong, C.; Zuozhi, C.; Peng, Z.; Kui, Z.; Jiangtao, F.; Guobao, C.; Yancong, C.; Mingshuai, S. Advances in Pelagic Fishery Resources Survey and Assessment in Open South China Sea. South China Fish. Sci. 2018, 14, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Nong, Z.; Chen, M.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, D.; Mei, Z. The First Baleen Whale Marine Protected Area Proposed for Bryde’s Whales in the Beibu Gulf, China. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2024, 40, 13082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, B.; Zhu, L.; Jefferson, T.A.; Zhou, K.; Yang, G. Coastal Bryde’s Whales’ (Balaenoptera edeni) Foraging Area Near Weizhou Island in the Beibu Gulf. Aquat. Mamm. 2019, 45, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, M.; Huang, S.; Wu, H.; Mei, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, J.; Cheng, W.; Deng, K.; Yang, C.; Chen, M. Occurrence of Bryde’s Whales, Balaenoptera edeni, in the Northern Beibu Gulf, China. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2019, 35, 1643–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, J.; Lu, F.; Liao, B.; Xiao, B.; Li, M.; He, L.; Bai, L.; Chen, B. A Young Eden’s Whale (Balaenoptera edeni edeni) Wandering in a Busy International Container Port. Aquat. Mamm. 2023, 49, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Goold, J.C.; Jones, S.E. Time and Frequency Domain Characteristics of Sperm Whale Clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Møhl, B.; Wahlberg, M.; Madsen, P.T.; Heerfordt, A.; Lund, A. The Monopulsed Nature of Sperm Whale Clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114, 1143–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Møhl, B.; Wahlberg, M.; Madsen, P.T.; Miller, L.A.; Surlykke, A. Sperm Whale Clicks: Directionality and Source Level Revisited. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Au, W.W.L.; Pawloski, J.L.; Nachtigall, P.E.; Blonz, M.; Gisner, R.C. Echolocation Signals and Transmission Beam Pattern of a False Killer Whale (Pseudorca crassidens). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Baumann-Pickering, S.; Simonis, A.; Oleson, E.; Baird, R.; Roch, M.; Wiggins, S. False Killer Whale and Short-finned Pilot Whale Acoustic Identification. Endang. Species Res. 2015, 28, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Madsen, P.T.; Kerr, I.; Payne, R. Echolocation Clicks of Two Free-ranging, Oceanic Delphinids with Different Food Preferences: False Killer Whales Pseudorca crassidens and Risso’s Dolphins Grampus griseus. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eskesen, I.G.; Wahlberg, M.; Simon, M.; Larsen, O.N. Comparison of Echolocation Clicks from Geographically Sympatric Killer Whales and Long-finned Pilot whales L. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baumann-Pickering, S.; McDonald, M.A.; Simonis, A.E.; Solsona Berga, A.; Merkens, K.P.B.; Oleson, E.M.; Roch, M.A.; Wiggins, S.M.; Rankin, S.; Yack, T.M. Species-Specific Beaked Whale Echolocation Signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 134, 2293–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Baumann-Pickering, S.; Roch, M.A.; Brownell, R.L., Jr.; Simonis, A.E.; McDonald, M.A.; Solsona-Berga, A.; Oleson, E.M.; Wiggins, S.M.; Hildebrand, J.A. Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Beaked Whale Echolocation Signals in the North Pacific. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, L.; Song, Y.; Lin, W.; Liu, M.; Lin, M.; Li, S. Echolocation Signals Recorded in the Presence of Deraniyagala’s Beaked Whales (Mesoplodon hotaula) in the Western Pacific (South China Sea) Indicate Species-specificity and Intraspecific Variation. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2025, 41, 13179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Frouin-Mouy, H.; Mouy, X.; Pilkington, J.; Küsel, E.; Nichol, L.; Doniol-Valcroze, T.; Lee, L. Acoustic and Visual Cetacean Surveys Reveal Year-round Spatial and Temporal Distributions for Multiple Species in Northern British Columbia, Canada. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sumaila, U.R.; Cheung, W.W.L. Boom or Bust: The Future of Fish in the South China Sea. Available online: https://www.admcf.org/research-admcf/boom-or-bust-the-future-of-fish-in-the-south-china-sea/ (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  64. Pauly, D.; Liang, C. The Fisheries of the South China Sea: Major Trends Since 1950. Mar. Policy. 2020, 121, 103584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teh, L.; Cashion, T.; Alava, J.J.; Cheung, W.W.; Sumaila, U.R. Status, Trends, and the Future of Fisheries in the East and South China Seas. 2019. Available online: https://www.admcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Sink-or-Swim-Full-Report_171121.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  66. Teh, L.S.L.; Witter, A.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Sumaila, U.R.; Yin, X. What Is at Stake? Status and Threats to South China Sea Marine Fisheries. Ambio 2017, 46, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, K.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Sun, M.; Xu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, Y. Climate-induced Small Pelagic Fish Blooms in an Overexploited Marine Ecosystem of the South China Sea. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 145, 109598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rosenberg, D. Fisheries management in the South China Sea. In Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a Cooperative Management Regime; Bateman, S., Emmers, R., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  69. Au, W.W.L. The Sonar of Dolphins; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  70. Dudzinski, K.M.; Thomas, J.A.; Gregg, J.D. Communication in Marine Mammals. Encycl. Mar. Mamm. 2009, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sayigh, L.S. Cetacean Acoustic Communication. In Biocommunication of Animals; Tembrock, G., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 275–297. [Google Scholar]
  72. Richardson, W.J.; Greene, C.R., Jr.; Malme, D.H.; Thomson, D.H. Marine Mammals and Noise; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  73. Erbe, C.; Marley, S.A.; Schoeman, R.P.; Smith, J.N.; Trigg, L.E.; Embling, C.B. The Effects of Ship Noise on Marine Mammals—A Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Halliday, W.D.; Insley, S.J.; Hilliard, R.C.; de Jong, T.; Pine, M.K. Potential Impacts of Shipping Noise on Marine Mammals in the Western Canadian Arctic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 123, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Middel, H.; Verones, F. Making Marine Noise Pollution Impacts Heard: The Case of Cetaceans in the North Sea Within Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tervo, O.M.; Blackwell, S.B.; Ditlevsen, S.; Garde, E.; Hansen, R.G.; Samson, A.L.; Conrad, A.S.; Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. Stuck in a Corner: Anthropogenic Noise Threatens Narwhals in Their Once Pristine Arctic Habitat. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Van der Hoop, J.M.; Moore, M.J.; Barco, S.G.; Cole, T.V.N.; Daoust, P.; Henry, A.G.; McAlpine, D.F.; McLellan, W.A.; Wimmer, T.; Solow, A.R. Assessment of Management to Mitigate Anthropogenic Effects on Large Whales. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lair, S.; Martineau, L.N.; Measures, L. Causes of Mortality in St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga (Delphinapterus leuca) from 1983 to 2012. Can. Sci. Advis. Secr. Ott. Can. 2014, 14, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  79. Metelitsa, A.; Kupfer, J. Oil and Gas Resources and Transit Issues in the South China Sea; Asia Society: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  80. Su, P.; Lin, L.; Lv, Y.; Liang, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, W.; He, H.; Yan, B.; Ji, Z.; Wang, L. Potential and Distribution of Natural Gas Hydrate Resources in the South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Delefosse, M.; Rahbek, M.L.; Roesen, L.; Clausen, K.T. Marine Mammal Sightings Around Oil and Gas Installations in the Central North Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. 2018, 98, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Helm, R.C.; Costa, D.P.; DeBruyn, T.D.; O’Shea, T.J.; Wells, R.S.; Williams, T.M. Overview of Effects of Oil Spills on Marine Mammals. In Handbook of Oil Spill Science and Technology; Wang, Z., Fingas, M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 455–475. [Google Scholar]
  83. Caldwell, J.; Dragoset, W. A Brief Overview of Seismic Air-gun Arrays. Lead. Edge 2000, 19, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dragoset, B. Introduction to Air Guns and Air-gun Arrays. Lead. Edge 2000, 19, 892–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gordon, J.; Gillespie, D.; Potter, J.; Frantzis, A.; Simmonds, M.P.; Swift, R.; Thompson, D. A Review of the Effects of Seismic Surveys on Marine Mammals. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2003, 37, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Weilgart, L.S. A Brief Review of Known Effects of Noise on Marine Mammals. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 2007, 20, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Affatati, A.; Camerlenghi, A. Effects of Marine Seismic Surveys on Free-ranging Fauna: A Systematic Literature Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1222523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Miller, P.J.O.; Johnson, M.P.; Madsen, P.T.; Biassoni, N.; Quero, M.; Tyack, P.L. Using At-Sea Experiments to Study the Effects of Airguns on the Foraging Behavior of Sperm Whales in the Gulf of Mexico. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2009, 56, 1168–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dunlop, R.A.; Noad, M.J.; McCauley, R.D.; Scott-Hayward, L.; Kniest, E.; Slade, R.; Paton, D.; Cato, D.H. Determining the Behavioural Dose–response Relationship of Marine Mammals to Air Gun Noise and Source Proximity. J. Exp. Biol. 2017, 220, 2878–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Takeshita, R.; Sullivan, L.; Smith, C.; Collier, T.; Hall, A.; Brosnan, T.; Rowles, T.; Schwacke, L. The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Marine Mammal Injury Assessment. Endang. Species Res. 2017, 33, 95–106. [Google Scholar]
Animals 15 02802 g001
Figure 1. Map of the survey area in the northern South China Sea and the survey track.
Figure 1. Map of the survey area in the northern South China Sea and the survey track.
Animals 15 02802 g001
Animals 15 02802 g002
Figure 2. Example of echolocation clicks from a group of odontocetes. The vertical axes, respectively, show the echolocation click receive level (sound pressure level [SPL]), time difference (TD), and inter-click intervals (ICI).
Figure 2. Example of echolocation clicks from a group of odontocetes. The vertical axes, respectively, show the echolocation click receive level (sound pressure level [SPL]), time difference (TD), and inter-click intervals (ICI).
Animals 15 02802 g002
Animals 15 02802 g003
Figure 3. Location of the cetacean visual sighting events in the northern South China Sea.
Figure 3. Location of the cetacean visual sighting events in the northern South China Sea.
Animals 15 02802 g003
Animals 15 02802 g004
Figure 4. The sizes of the sighted cetacean groups and the depth of the sighting locations.
Figure 4. The sizes of the sighted cetacean groups and the depth of the sighting locations.
Animals 15 02802 g004
Animals 15 02802 g005
Figure 5. Location of cetacean acoustic detection events in the northern South China Sea.
Figure 5. Location of cetacean acoustic detection events in the northern South China Sea.
Animals 15 02802 g005
Table 1. Summary of the information on cetacean visual sightings, including date, time, species, position, group size, depth, and sea state.
Table 1. Summary of the information on cetacean visual sightings, including date, time, species, position, group size, depth, and sea state.
Date
(Year-Month-Day)		Time
(Hour-Minute)		SpeciesLongitude
(°)		Latitude
(°)		Group Size
(Number of Individuals)		Depth
(m)		Sea State
2024-03-2609:14Bryde’s whale
(Balaenoptera brydei)		112.00319.53411202
2024-03-2610:23Unidentified112.07119.45412002
2024-03-2809:24Pantropical spotted dolphin Stenella attenuata116.68317.5514040001
2024-03-2915:20Common dolphin
(Delphinus delphis)		116.59718.0545036001
2024-03-2916:19Risso’s dolphin
(Grampus griseus)		116.46218.0547037501
2024-03-2917:11Striped dolphin
(Stenella coeruleoalba)
Pantropical spotted dolphin
Spinner dolphin
(Stenella longirostris)		116.40318.0629039001
2024-03-3016:20Unidentified113.92718.052138001
2024-04-0107:50Pilot whale
(Globicephala spp.)		117.77918.55020038402
2024-04-0109:20Risso’s dolphin117.81818.5482038401
2024-04-0110:24Sperm whale117.89918.550438401
2024-04-0116:41Striped dolphin118.58418.551137401
2024-08-1512:07Unidentified114.41017.557135004
2024-08-1709:53Unidentified117.97516.243435002
2024-08-1817:58Unidentified117.32916.594540002
2024-08-1915:22Unidentified118.55316.568122002
2024-08-1917:24Unidentified118.70816.642722002
2024-08-2009:57Unidentified118.75216.999323003
2024-08-2117:21Spinner dolphin117.95017.522752900
2024-08-2208:23Beak whale118.03917.682439001
2024-08-2214:32Pantropical spotted dolphin
Spinner dolphin		117.52818.04625039002
2024-08-2218:40Unidentified117.24818.249139001
2024-08-2219:00Unidentified117.26018.258139002
2024-08-2307:27Pantropical spotted dolphin117.25318.3383238002
2024-08-2307:48Striped dolphin117.22418.3272539002
2024-08-2411:37Beak whale115.23018.429437002
2024-08-2415:20Pantropical spotted dolphin114.89918.42412036502
2024-08-2416:35Pantropical spotted dolphin
Bottlenose dolphin
(Tursiops aduncus)		114.86718.44920036502
2014-08-2517:02Bottlenose dolphin113.45618.62115015002
Table 2. Summary of acoustic detection events for toothed cetaceans, including date, time, and position.
Table 2. Summary of acoustic detection events for toothed cetaceans, including date, time, and position.
EventDate
(Year-Month-Day)		Time
(Hour-Minute-Second)		Latitude
(°)		Longitude
(°)
12024-03-283:29:5017.550116.006
22024-03-284:21:3017.550116.104
32024-03-287:50:5517.550116.495
42024-03-289:26:3017.553116.687
52024-03-2813:28:4517.717117.000
62024-03-2814:34:4517.636117.085
72024-03-292:30:0017.589117.951
82024-03-2916:26:0018.054116.462
92024-03-2917:12:0018.062116.403
102024-03-311:32:0018.353114.334
112024-03-3123:22:0018.561116.658
122024-04-012:15:0018.551117.045
132024-04-018:30:0018.530117.765
142024-04-019:30:0018.544117.826
152024-04-0110:36:0018.544117.911
162024-04-0111:51:0018.550117.944
172024-04-0116:48:0018.551118.584
182024-04-0122:57:0019.051115.888
192024-04-0123:29:0019.050115.832
202024-04-0312:32:0019.551114.939
212024-04-0315:10:0019.746114.633
222024-04-0318:52:0020.014114.209
232024-08-1519:18:0017.552115.187
242024-08-1521:38:1517.559115.387
252024-08-161:03:3017.534115.976
262024-08-162:04:0017.516116.140
272024-08-163:37:1017.516116.299
282024-08-163:50:0017.502116.376
292024-08-1621:55:0017.283117.413
302024-08-171:31:5016.874117.750
312024-08-171:34:1016.870117.753
322024-08-1913:06:0016.564118.268
332024-08-1918:15:0016.650118.669
342024-08-1921:52:0016.689118.686
352024-08-2014:54:0017.242118.148
362024-08-2117:40:0017.557117.96
372024-08-2120:55:0017.523118.06
382024-08-2123:30:0017.523118.06
392024-08-2214:40:0018.038117.521
402024-08-2215:29:0018.048117.498
412024-08-2219:35:0018.258117.259
422024-08-233:30:0018.278117.3
432024-08-237:35:0018.33117.244
442024-08-238:06:3018.333117.2
452024-08-2320:30:0018.446115.852
462024-08-240:00:0018.405115.781
472024-08-242:00:0018.418115.79
482024-08-2412:35:0018.418115.247
492024-08-2415:26:4418.424114.888
502024-08-2416:39:0018.443114.899
512024-08-2420:35:0018.536114.71
522024-08-2517:12:0018.625113.442
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Long, X.; Lu, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhen, Z.; Li, K.; Gutang, Q.; et al. Diversity and Distribution of Deep-Sea Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual and Acoustic Surveys. Animals 2025, 15, 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192802

AMA Style

Fang L, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang Y, Long X, Lu W, Zhao H, Zhen Z, Li K, Gutang Q, et al. Diversity and Distribution of Deep-Sea Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual and Acoustic Surveys. Animals. 2025; 15(19):2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Liang, Xinxing Wang, Yujian Chen, Yuezhong Wang, Xinrui Long, Wentao Lu, Hancheng Zhao, Zhao Zhen, Kunhuan Li, Qilin Gutang, and et al. 2025. "Diversity and Distribution of Deep-Sea Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual and Acoustic Surveys" Animals 15, no. 19: 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192802

APA Style

Fang, L., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Long, X., Lu, W., Zhao, H., Zhen, Z., Li, K., Gutang, Q., & Chen, T. (2025). Diversity and Distribution of Deep-Sea Cetaceans in the Northern South China Sea Based on Visual and Acoustic Surveys. Animals, 15(19), 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop