Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities, Morphology, and Caecal Microbiota in Meat Rabbits
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Experimental Design and Feeding Management
2.3. Growth Performance Measurement
2.4. Detection of Serum Antioxidant Capacity
2.5. Determination of Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity
2.6. Histomorphological Analysis of Intestinal Tissues
2.7. Caecal Caecal Microbiota Analysis
2.8. Data Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Serum Antioxidant Capacity
3.3. Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity
3.4. Intestinal Morphology Analysis
3.5. Caecal Microflora Profiling
3.5.1. Alpha Diversity of Caecal Flora in Rabbits Supplemented with CA
3.5.2. Effects of CA on the Composition and Relative Abundance of Rabbit Caecal Flora at Phylum, Family, and Genus Levels
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of Dietary CA Supplementation on the Growth Performance of Rabbits
4.2. Effects of Dietary CA Supplementation on Serum Antioxidant Capacity of Meat Rabbits
4.3. Effects of Dietary CA Supplementation on Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity
4.4. Effects of Dietary CA Supplementation on Intestinal Morphology of Meat Rabbits
4.5. Effects of Dietary CA Supplementation on Caecal Microflora Diversity of Meat Rabbits
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CA | Cinnamaldehyde |
| IBW | Initial body weight |
| FBW | Final body weight |
| AGPs | Antibiotic growth promoters |
| ADG | Average daily gain |
| ADFI | Average daily feed intake |
| FCR | Feed conversion ratio |
| SOD | Superoxide dismutase |
| GSH-PX | Glutathione peroxidase |
| CAT | Catalase |
| TPX | Thioredoxin-dependent peroxidase |
| DR | Diarrhoea rate |
| MR | Mortality rate |
References
- World Health Organization (WHO). Monitoring and Evaluation of the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/monitoring-and-evaluation-of-the-global-action-plan-on-antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- Liu, M.; Luan, H.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, W.; Xu, W.; Wang, F.; Xuan, H.; Song, P. Antibiotic Alternatives in Livestock Feeding. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 989, 179867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Founou, L.L.; Founou, R.C.; Essack, S.Y. Antibiotic Resistance in the Food Chain: A Developing Country-Perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tullo, E.; Finzi, A.; Guarino, M. Review: Environmental Impact of Livestock Farming and Precision Livestock Farming as a Mitigation Strategy. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 2751–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Postma, M.; Dewulf, J. Biosecurity and Its Relationship with Health, Production and Antimicrobial Use. In Biosecurity in Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine: From Principles to Practice; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Azizi, M.N.; Zahir, A.; Mahaq, O.; Aminullah, N. The Alternatives of Antibiotics in Poultry Production for Reducing Antimicrobial Resistance. World Vet. J. 2024, 14, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saadaoui, I.; Rasheed, R.; Aguilar, A.; Cherif, M.; Al Jabri, H.; Sayadi, S.; Manning, S.R. Microalgal-Based Feed: Promising Alternative Feedstocks for Livestock and Poultry Production. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egbu, C.F.; Mulaudzi, A.; Motsei, L.E.; Mnisi, C.M. Moringa oleifera Products as Nutraceuticals for Sustainable Poultry Production. Agric. Food Secur. 2024, 13, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sun, P.; Zhang, B.; Kong, L.; Xiao, C.; Song, Z. Progress on Gut Health Maintenance and Antibiotic Alternatives in Broiler Chicken Production. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 692839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevastianova, T.V.; Usha, B.V. Combined Functional Additives for Farm Animals Are an Important Segment in the Implementation of the Antibiotic Resistance Strategy and an Effective Mechanism for Restoring Animal Homeostasis in Mixed Pathologies. Agrarian Sci. 2022, 4, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullere, M.; Dalle Zotte, A. Rabbit Meat Production and Consumption: State of Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.P.; Wang, J.X.; Qin, Y.H. Production Status of Rabbit Industry in 2021, Development Trend in 2022 and Policy Suggestions. Chin. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 58, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Blas, C.; Wiseman, J. Nutrition of the Rabbit, 2nd ed.; Tang, L.M., Translator; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2015; p. 475. [Google Scholar]
- Esteves, P.J.; Abrantes, J.; Lopes, A.M. New Insights into Rabbit Viral Diseases. Viruses 2024, 16, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, X.L.; Lin, Z.M. Causes and Prevention of Diarrhea Diseases in Young Rabbits. China J. Rabbit Farm. 2024, 1, 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- Beaumont, M.; Mussard, E.; Barilly, C.; Lencina, C.; Gress, L.; Painteaux, L.; Gabinaud, B.; Cauquil, L.; Aymard, P.; Canlet, C.; et al. Developmental Stage, Solid Food Introduction, and Suckling Cessation Differentially Influence the Comaturation of the Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Epithelium in Rabbits. J. Nutr. 2022, 152, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Abdelsattar, M.M.; Gu, M.; Zhao, W.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Guo, P.; Huang, C.; Fang, S.; Gan, Q. The Effects of Temperature and Humidity Index on Growth Performance, Colon Microbiota, and Serum Metabolome of Ira Rabbits. Animals 2023, 13, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Su, X.; Guo, S.; Shi, H.; Guo, C.; Li, J.; Lv, J.; Yu, M.; Huang, M. Effects of Compound Essential Oil and Oregano Oil on Production Performance, Immunity and Antioxidant Capacity of Meat Rabbits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 22, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacova, K.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Laukova, A.; Chrastinova, L.; Gancarcikova, S.; Zitnan, R.; Takacsova, M.; Sopkova, D.; Andrejcakova, Z.; Pogany Simonova, M.; et al. Effect of Thymol and Enterocin M Administration on Biochemical, Antioxidant and Immunological Parameters, Small Intestinal Morphology and Microbiota in Rabbits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 22, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E.; Mohammed, N.G.; Khafaga, A.F.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A.; Elnesr, S.S. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Oil as a Potential Alternative to Antibiotics in Poultry. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Huang, J. Antibiotic Resistance Spectrums of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. Strains Against Commonly Used Antimicrobials from Commercial Meat-Rabbit Farms in Chengdu City, Southwest China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1369655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wessels, C.W. Effects of Essential Oils on Economically Important Characteristics of Ruminant Species: A Comprehensive Review. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Liu, F.; Gong, F.; Zhi, K.; Shi, M.; Li, Z.; He, J. Biological Functions of Cinnamaldehyde and Its Application in Livestock and Poultry Breeding. Chin. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2023, 50, 4035–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Aziz, M.A.; Abd El-Salam, S.E.; Ahmed, M.A.S.; Mourad, D.M.; El-Samahy, H.S.; Badri, F.B.; Thabet, H.A. Effectiveness of Probiotics and Clove Essential Oils in Improving Growth Performance, Immuno-Antioxidant Status, Ileum Morphometric, and Microbial Community Structure for Heat-Stressed Broilers. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, L.; Freitas, C.; Nunes, C.; Virdis, S.; Mazzoni, M.; Dalcanale, S.; Trevisi, P. Blend of Natural and Natural Identical Essential Oil Compounds as a Strategy to Improve the Gut Health of Weaning Pigs. Animal 2023, 17, 101031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Durjava, M.F.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; Puente, S.L.; Marcon, F.; Mayo, B.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Feed Additives Consisting of Essential Oils from the Bark and the Leaves of Cinnamomum verum J. Presl (Cinnamon Bark Oil and Cinnamon Leaf Oil) for Use in All Animal Species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J. 2022, 20, 7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivakumar, D.; Wijeratnam, R.S.W.; Wijesundera, R.L.C. Combined Effect of Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) Compounds and Trichoderma harzianum on the Control of Postharvest Diseases of Rambutan. Phytoparasitica 2002, 30, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.; Li, N.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, L.L.; Mu, S.Q.; Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Yan, J.; Sun, C. Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation Improves the Growth Performance, Oxidative Stability, Immune Function, and Meat Quality in Finishing Pigs. Livest. Sci. 2020, 240, 104221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attia, Y.; Al-Harthi, M.; El-Kelawy, M. Utilisation of Essential Oils as a Natural Growth Promoter for Broiler Chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.J.; Wei, Q.P.; Zhao, P.; Liu, L.X.; Song, Q.L.; Zhou, Z.H.; Chen, X.L. Effects of Coated Cinnamaldehyde on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Serum Antioxidant Indices and Jejunal Morphology of Meat Ducks under High Temperature in Summer. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar]
- Chapman, C.E.; Ort, S.B.; Aragona, K.M.; Cabral, R.G.; Erickson, P.S. Effect of Cinnamaldehyde on Feed Intake, Rumen Fermentation, and Nutrient Digestibility in Lactating Dairy Cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 1819–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Jiang, W.D.; Zhang, J.X.; Feng, L.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.Y.; Tang, L.; Peng, Y.; et al. Cinnamaldehyde Improves the Growth Performance and Digestion and Absorption Capacity in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 46, 1589–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Blas, J.C. Nutritional Impact on Health and Performance in Intensively Reared Rabbits. Animal 2013, 7, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Diarra, M.S.; Choi, J.; Rodas-Gonzalez, A.; Lepp, D.; Liu, S.; Lu, P.; Mogire, M.; Gong, J.; Wang, Q. Effects of Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde on Growth Performance, Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Functions, Meat Quality and Gut Microbiota in Broiler Chickens. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2021, 5, txab099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, P.; Wu, J.; Zhang, H.; Perry, S.W.; Yin, B.; Tan, X.; Chai, T.; Liang, W.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. The Gut Microbiome Modulates Gut-Brain Axis Glycerophospholipid Metabolism in a Region-Specific Manner in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Depression. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2380–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evangelista, A.G.; Corrêa, J.A.F.; Pinto, A.C.S.M.; Luciano, F.B. The Impact of Essential Oils on Antibiotic Use in Animal Production Regarding Antimicrobial Resistance—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Wang, E.D.; Wang, B.H.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhou, Y.L.; Shen, S.T.; He, B.; Ding, H.L. Effects of Cinnamaldehyde as Replacement for Chlortetracycline and Zinc Bacitracin in Nursery Pig Diets. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 28, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.X.; Liu, K.D.; Sun, G.Q. Effects of Cinnamic Aldehyde on Purine Derivatives Excretion, Milk Performance and Nitrogen Excretion of Dairy Cows. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 29, 2010–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.Y.; Wang, Q.Y.; Peng, D.W.; Pan, Y.F.; Gao, X.M.; Xuan, Z.Y.; Chen, S.M.; Zou, C.X.; Cao, Y.H.; Lin, B. Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth, Health and Rumen Fermentation Performance in Dairy Bull Calves. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2021, 54, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Fang, S.; Chen, X.; Pan, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, C.; Xiao, T.; Gan, Q. Butyrate-Producing Bacteria and Gut Barrier Function. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2183687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Q.; Hao, X.Y.; Zhang, H.X.; Chen, Y.H.; Xiang, B.W.; Zhang, W.J.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, J.X. Effects of Different Supplemental Levels of Cinnamaldehyde on Ruminal Degradation Characteristics of Dietary Nutrients and in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Parameters in Meat Sheep. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 33, 2765–2775. [Google Scholar]
- Farag, M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Tufarelli, V. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of Resveratrol, Cinnamaldehyde and their Synergistic Effect Against Cyadox-Induced Cytotoxicity in Rabbit Erythrocytes. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 40, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, N.; Gupta, P.; Saini, V.; Sherawat, S.; Gupta, S.; Dua, A.; Kumar, V.; Injeti, E.; Mittal, A. Cinnamaldehyde regulates H2O2 induced skeletal muscle atrophy by ameliorating the proteolytic and antioxidant defense systems. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 6194–6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Maghawry, S.; Ahmed, M.; El-Sebaii, A.; Hussein, M. Reference Intervals for Oxidative Stress Markers in Clinically Healthy Rabbits: Implications for Nutritional Studies. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2022, 245, 110385. [Google Scholar]
- Carabaño, R.; Piquer, J.; Menoyo, D.; Badiola, I. The digestive system of the rabbit. In Nutrition of the Rabbit; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2020; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Chiou, P.W.S. The morphological changes of intestinal mucosa in growing rabbits. Lab. Anim. 1997, 31, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, G.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Wu, X.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P. Effects of Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Digestibility, Immunity, and Intestinal Health in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Bai, M.; Xing, Y.; Liu, J.; Xu, K.; Xiong, X.; Liu, H.; Yin, Y. Artemisia annua Residue Regulates Immunity, Antioxidant Ability, Intestinal Barrier Function, and Microbial Structure in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2024, 14, 3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, M.Y.; Duan, Y.L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.H.; Hu, Q.B.; Guo, S.S.; Ding, B.Y.; Zhang, Z.F.; Li, L.L. Responses of Intestinal Morphology, Immunity, Antioxidant Status and Cecal Microbiota to the Mixture of Glycerol Monolaurate and Cinnamaldehyde in Laying Hens. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Xiao, G.; Yan, X.; Qiu, T.; Liu, S.; Ou, J.; Cen, M.; Gong, L.; Shi, J.; Zhang, H. Complex of Lauric Acid Monoglyceride and Cinnamaldehyde Ameliorated Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis in Yellow-Feathered Broilers by Regulating Gut Morphology, Barrier, Inflammation and Serum Biochemistry. Animals 2023, 13, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, S.M.; Chen, X.; Pan, J.H.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, L.; Wang, C.; Xiao, T.; Gan, Q.F. Dynamic Distribution of Gut Microbiota in Meat Rabbits at Different Growth Stages and Relationship with Average Daily Gain (ADG). BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kylie, J. An Investigation into the Fecal Microbiota of Domestic Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and Factors Influencing Its Composition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Li, P.; Zhang, G. Cinnamaldehyde Reshapes Gut Microbiota to Improve Metabolic Health in Rabbits. Animals 2023, 13, 1452. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.; Kennes, Y.M.; Lepp, D.; Yin, X.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Yang, C.; Gong, J.; Diarra, M.S. Effects of Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral on the Performance and Cecal Microbiota of Broilers Vaccinated or Not Vaccinated Against Coccidiosis. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, C.; Zhang, L.; Cao, G.; Feng, J. Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Cinnamaldehyde against Pathogenic Bacteria in Livestock. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1123456. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Z.; Chen, J.; Lin, T.; Zhu, J.; Gan, H.; Chen, F.; Zhang, S.; Guan, W. Dietary Supplementation with Lysozyme–Cinnamaldehyde Conjugates Enhances Feed Conversion Efficiency by Improving Intestinal Health and Modulating the Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets Infected with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Animals 2023, 13, 3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.W.; Li, J.F.; Wu, Y.Y. Dietary Supplementation with Cinnamaldehyde Improves Growth Performance and Gut Health in Rabbits: The Role of Microbiota Composition. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F.; Liu, R.; Wang, S. Dose-Dependent Effects of Phytogenic Feed Additives on Animal Gut Microbiota: A Meta-Analysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2024, 308, 115678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Items | Content (%) |
|---|---|
| Ingredients | |
| Corn | 30 |
| Soybean meal | 15 |
| Wheat bran | 25 |
| Peanut shell powder | 5.0 |
| Alfalfa meal | 20.0 |
| Premix 1 | 5 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | |
| CP | 17 |
| DE/(MJ·kg−1) | 10.6 |
| CF | 13 |
| NDF | 32 |
| ADF | 19 |
| ADL | 5 |
| Ca | 1 |
| P | 0.5 |
| Items | CA, mg/kg | SEM | p-Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A 0 | Group B 50 | Group C 100 | Group D 150 | Group E 200 | |||
| IBW (g) | 1103.36 | 1096.71 | 1097.33 | 1098.05 | 1081.64 | 8.017 | 0.956 |
| FBW (g) | 2525.26 BC | 2501.41 B | 2575.99 AC | 2624.42 A | 2592.50 A | 13.040 | 0.001 |
| ADFI (g/d) | 179.72 | 174.59 | 179.06 | 182.06 | 178.14 | 3.004 | 0.971 |
| ADG (g/d) | 34.68 B | 34.26 BC | 36.06 AC | 37.23 A | 36.85 A | 0.371 | 0.010 |
| F/D | 5.18 | 5.10 | 4.97 | 4.89 | 4.85 | 0.091 | 0.803 |
| DR (%) | 17.78 B | 14.44 B | 16.67 B | 7.78 C | 27.78 A | 1.766 | <0.001 |
| MR (%) | 22.22 A | 16.67 BC | 13.33 C | 8.89 D | 20.00 AB | 1.366 | <0.001 |
| Items | Group A | Group C | Group D | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mL) | 56.09 C | 64.96 B | 74.20 A | 1.373 | <0.001 |
| GSH-PX (U/mL) | 216.65 C | 239.28 B | 258.70 A | 3.017 | <0.001 |
| CAT (U/mL) | 56.90 C | 61.99 B | 67.97 A | 0.837 | <0.001 |
| TPX (U/mL) | 74.13 C | 86.14 B | 95.33 A | 1.564 | <0.001 |
| Items | Tissue | CA, mg/kg | SEM | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A 0 | Group C 100 | Group D 150 | ||||
| Protease (U/mL) | Caecum | 201.48 B | 237.46 A | 252.93 A | 6.25 | <0.001 |
| Amylase (U/L) | 65.39 C | 77.79 B | 94.66 A | 2.99 | <0.001 | |
| Lipase (U/L) | 147.31 C | 172.12 B | 211.18 A | 6.39 | <0.001 | |
| Protease (U/mL) | Duodenum | 220.10 C | 286.26 B | 349.79 A | 12.38 | <0.001 |
| Amylase (U/L) | 84.18 B | 96.86 B | 113.57 A | 3.08 | <0.001 | |
| Lipase (U/L) | 98.74 C | 122.11 B | 150.51 A | 5.28 | <0.001 | |
| Items | Tissue | CA, mg/kg | SEM | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A 0 | Group C 100 | Group D 150 | ||||
| Villus length (μm) | Duodenum | 994.99 B | 1003.48 B | 1111.80 A | 19.909 | 0.022 |
| Crypt depth (μm) | 114.32 | 119.97 | 119.93 | 3.340 | 0.746 | |
| Villus length/crypt depth (V/C) | 8.84 | 8.68 | 9.58 | 0.273 | 0.350 | |
| Muscular thickness (μm) | Colon | 175.82 | 175.24 | 166.30 | 5.326 | 0.746 |
| Intestinal gland depth (μm) | 383.78 | 381.14 | 340.69 | 8.819 | 0.076 | |
| Muscular thickness (μm) | 411.34 | 432.44 | 409.56 | 11.002 | 0.643 | |
| Items | Group A | Group C | Group D | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 916.67 | 928.33 | 932.83 | 5.048 | 0.428 |
| Ace | 1013.20 | 1005.10 | 1053.50 | 5.504 | 0.030 |
| Chao | 1018.50 B | 1015.50 | 1063.20 A | 5.938 | 0.019 |
| Coverage (%) | 99.28 B | 99.32 B | 99.51 A | 0.018 | 0.005 |
| Shannon | 5.21 A | 5.01 B | 5.24 A | 0.018 | 0.110 |
| Simpson | 0.02 B | 0.03 A | 0.02 B | 0.001 | 0.021 |
| Sobs | 871.17 B | 861.50 B | 941.83 A | 4.487 | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, D.; Lan, Y.; He, Y.; Gao, C.; Jiang, B.; Xie, X. Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities, Morphology, and Caecal Microbiota in Meat Rabbits. Animals 2025, 15, 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152262
Chen D, Lan Y, He Y, Gao C, Jiang B, Xie X. Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities, Morphology, and Caecal Microbiota in Meat Rabbits. Animals. 2025; 15(15):2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152262
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Dongjin, Yuxiang Lan, Yuqin He, Chengfang Gao, Bin Jiang, and Xiping Xie. 2025. "Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities, Morphology, and Caecal Microbiota in Meat Rabbits" Animals 15, no. 15: 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152262
APA StyleChen, D., Lan, Y., He, Y., Gao, C., Jiang, B., & Xie, X. (2025). Effects of Dietary Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant Capacity, Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activities, Morphology, and Caecal Microbiota in Meat Rabbits. Animals, 15(15), 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152262
