Next Article in Journal
Simulation and Identification of the Habitat of Antarctic Krill Based on Vessel Position Data and Integrated Species Distribution Model: A Case Study of Pumping-Suction Beam Trawl Fishing Vessels
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation of Novel Aflatoxin Oxidase CotA Alleviates Aflatoxin B1-Induced Oxidative Stress, Lipid Metabolism Disorder, and Apoptosis in the Liver of Japanese Quails
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Detection of Different Species of Cryptosporidium in Snakes from Surinam and Indonesia

by
Magdaléna Polláková
1,
Monika Sučik
1,* and
Vladimír Petrilla
1,2
1
Department of Biology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia
2
Zoological Department, Zoological Garden Košice, Široká 31, Kavečany, 040 06 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(11), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111556
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 24 May 2025 / Published: 26 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Herpetology)

Simple Summary

The global trade and husbandry of exotic reptiles have expanded significantly, raising concerns about associated health and ecological risks. This study examined the presence of Cryptosporidium spp., a microscopic parasite, in feces of wild-caught snakes from Suriname and Indonesia before their introduction into private collections. Fecal samples from 40 individuals were analyzed, revealing cryptosporidial oocysts in six cases. Notably, the detected species—C. hominis, C. parvum, and C. tyzzeri—are primarily associated with humans and mammals rather than reptiles, indicating potential zoonotic implications and a possible risk of transmission to people who handle these animals. This finding highlights the importance of regular health screening for exotic reptiles to prevent the spread of infections. Additionally, releasing or relocating infected animals could introduce these parasites into new environments, potentially affecting local wildlife and disrupting ecosystems. Ensuring proper veterinary monitoring and hygiene measures is essential to reduce these risks. This study emphasizes the need for responsible handling of wild-caught reptiles to protect both human and animal health while maintaining ecological balance.

Abstract

In recent decades, the keeping of exotic animals has gained popularity among enthusiasts worldwide. However, alongside the development of exotic animal husbandry, issues related to health status and adequate veterinary care are coming to the forefront. The introduction of new snakes into a collection and shared enclosures should always be preceded by an assessment of their parasitic status. In our study, we present an overview of the screening for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. in individuals captured in regions of Indonesia and Suriname, intended for further trade. Out of 40 tested fecal samples, the presence of cryptosporidial oocysts was confirmed in 6 samples. Detection was performed by molecular methods, namely Nested PCR targeting the GP60 gene region (60 kDa glycoprotein). By sequencing, we confirmed the presence of C. parvum in Oligodon octolineatus (n = 1) and Trimeresurus insularis (n = 1), C. tyzzeri in Corallus spp. (n = 2), and C. hominis in Boiga dendrophila spp. gemmicincta (n = 2), which is the very first time that this species has been detected in snakes in captivity. Although the presence of Cryptosporidium species, typical for snakes, was not detected, the identified species may pose a health risk to humans, especially workers who come into direct contact with animals.

1. Introduction

The presence of parasitic protozoans from the genus Cryptosporidium in reptiles, especially snakes, has already been described by different authors, who highlighted the zoonotic potential, chronic nature of the infection as well as the possible cross-transmission of pathogens between different host species, e.g., wild animals, domestic animals, and humans [1].
Out of 38 currently identified Cryptosporidium species, only 4 species are known to infect reptiles (Cryptosporidium serpentis, Cryptosporidium testudines, Cryptosporidium varanii (saurophilum), and Cryptosporidium ducismarci), from which only 2 species were found to cause diseases in snakes [2,3,4]. The diagnosis of the presence of pathogenic cryptosporidial oocysts in the organism of reptiles as well as the determination of an ongoing cryptosporidial infection have certain limitations that should be addressed.
One of the possible problems of diagnosis is the relatively small size of oocysts and low number of oocysts excreted during the subclinical stage of cryptosporidial infection, which may lead to false-negative results of testing. On the other hand, conventional morphologic identification of oocysts through microscopic examination using a stool smear is not considered to be a reliable diagnostic method either, as it is difficult to differentiate pathogenic oocysts from those which just pass through the gastrointestinal tract, and a potential problem with false-positives may occur due to the cross-reaction with other species of Cryptosporidium (e.g., C. parvum, C. muris) whose oocysts are eliminated at the time of feeding. Therefore, euthanizing reptiles tested positive for the presence of oocysts is not a recommended prevention strategy, as this practice might lead to the killing of uninfected animals [5,6,7].
Certain conditions of breeding facilities, such as sanitary management, ambient temperature, and high humidity, among other factors, can maintain and prolong the viability of oocysts. The inactivation of oocysts using disinfectants was not proved to be efficient, and the usage of traditional anticoccidials also often does not produce the desired results. Limited treatment options for cryptosporidiosis require the introduction of husbandry approaches with an emphasis on preventive measures and strict hygiene practices. Parasitological monitoring of new individuals before their introduction into collections as well as the testing of specimens in captive populations should be periodically carried out, even among clinically healthy animals. A study carried out in the premises of the Barcelona Zoo considers the individuals with chronic cryptosporidial infection to be the primary transmission route and a source of protozoa and cause of re-infections in enclosures [8].
Thorough monitoring of the collection and identification of infected individuals enables the isolation of suspicious animals and thus prevents the transmission of infections in captive environment. Moreover, screening for protozoan diseases ensures the preservation of the breeding quality and genetic lines of snakes [1,9].
The aim of our study was to monitor the health status of wild-caught snakes collected in Indonesia for the purpose of placement in private breeding collections. Many of these facilities possess high-value specimens of expensive snake species, and it is therefore necessary to verify parasitic status before introducing new individuals. At the same time, factors such as stress and discomfort during transportation must be considered, given that they can contribute to the outbreak of the initially subclinical infection.
After the snakes were caught in the wild, their feces were collected for further veterinary analysis focused on the presence of cryptosporidial oocysts.
In our study, we analyzed the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. in the feces of several wild-caught snake species, namely Boa constrictor, Corallus caninus, and Corallus hortulanus from Surinam, and Boiga cynodon, Boiga dendrophila spp. gemmicincta, Boiga irregularis, Chrysopelea paradisi, Gonyosoma janseni, Oligodon octolineatus, and Trimeresurus insularis from Indonesia (Table 1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Samples

Stool samples were collected from 10 species of snakes (40 snakes) originating from Surinam and Indonesia. All responsibilities related to the handling of snakes, including animal welfare, sampling procedures, antiparasitic treatments, and health-status monitoring, were fully covered by the company MD—REPTILES, s.r.o. The biological material, including fecal samples and mice used for feeding the snakes, was provided by MD—REPTILES, s.r.o. solely for the purposes of scientific research.
The droppings were collected from February to May after their arrival in Slovakia. During their stay in Slovakia, they were fed mice, which we tested for the presence of cryptosporidial oocysts and were negative. None of the animals showed any gastrointestinal clinical signs. After the collection itself, the samples were kept in a freezer until analysis.
Based on the information provided to us, none of the snakes exhibited any overt signs of disease or physical abnormalities, and no data regarding mortality were reported.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Feces samples were applied to microtubes containing glass (0.5 mm) and zirconium beads (1.0 mm), ensuring better mechanical disruption of cryptosporidial oocysts. After pouring in the lysis solution, they were homogenized 2 × 45 s at 6500 rpm using a Precellys 24 device (Berlin Technologies, GmbH, Berlin, Germany). DNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the AmpliSens® DNA-sorb-B isolation kit (InterLabService, Moscow, Russia), which is designed for stool processing. If the samples were not processed immediately, they were stored in a freezer at −20 °C.

2.3. PCR Amplification

To amplify the 60 kDa glycoprotein gene (gp60) of Cryptosporidium spp., Nested PCR was used according to Xiao (2010) [21]. Master Mix—45 μL (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) contained 5 U Taq DNA polymerase (FIREpol), 0.1 μM primers GP_F1 (5′-ATGAGATTGTCGCTCATTATC-3′), GP_R1 (5′-TTACAACACGAATAAGGCTGC-3′), GP_F2 (5′-GCCGTTCCACTCAGAGGAACC-3′), GP_R2 (5′-CACATTACAAATGAAGTGCCGC-3′). Reactions were performed in XP Thermal Cycler Blocks, and the program consisted of incubation at 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54/58 °C for 45 s, termination at 72 °C for 1.5 min and final polymerization at 72 °C for 7 min. We then analyzed the final 450 bp products (for primers targeting the gp60 gene) on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with GoodView-Nucleic Acid Stain in TAE buffer. The sequencing service verified positive samples using the Sanger sequencing method, and the final sequences were compared to homologous sequences deposited in GenBank using ElasticBLAST 1.4.0.

3. Results

Successful cryptosporidial species identification was achieved through sequence analysis in 6 of 40 samples (Table 2). Four positive snakes came from Indonesia and two from Surinam. C. hominis was detected in two snakes of the species Boiga gemmicincta, C. parvum was detected in Oligodon octolineatus and Trimeresurus insularis, and C. tyzzeri was found in snakes originating from Surinam, namely Corallus hortulanus and Corallus caninus.

4. Discussion

Cryptosporidial infections in snakes can lead to a range of health issues, including gastrointestinal disorders, which result in a general state of poor health. Affected snakes may exhibit signs of dehydration, lethargy, and loss of appetite. In more severe cases, prolonged infection can lead to weight loss, emaciation, and an overall debilitated appearance. Respiratory issues may also be observed, although less frequently. These clinical signs are often accompanied by a general weakness, which can be fatal if not addressed. Cryptosporidiosis is typically a condition that resolves on its own in healthy animals, but it can pose a life-threatening risk to immuno-compromised individuals and juveniles [22].
When establishing a definitive diagnosis of cryptosporidial infection and subsequently implementing effective treatment, it is essential to also consider the fact that infected prey may serve as a source of oocysts, which can passively transit through the reptile’s gastrointestinal tract without causing an actual infection [23]. Cryptosporidium species that have been isolated from reptilian feces include Cryptosporidium baileyi, C. muris, C. parvum mouse genotype, and C. parvum bovine genotype. The authors of the study report that no infections in humans had been linked with reptilian Cryptosporidium species (C. serpentis, C. testudines, C. varanii, and C. ducismarci) to date [1].
In the case of Cryptosporidium parvum species, one report suggested that C. parvum is not transmissible to reptiles, fish or amphibians. Authors state that under certain circumstances, e.g., the ingestion of C. parvum-infected prey, these animals may possibly disseminate C. parvum oocysts in the environment [24]. For this reason, we decided to test the mice that were used to feed the snakes after their capture, for the presence of C. parvum oocysts in the mice’s gastrointestinal tract. The results of all the samples obtained from mice were negative, which suggests that the presence of cryptosporidial oocysts in the feces of the tested snakes was not caused by the administration of contaminated food.
The occurrence of the obligatory parasite Cryptosporidium spp. has been studied by several scientists from different parts of the world. Of the listed species (as can be seen from Table 3), C. serpentis predominates, which infects most wild snakes but is also easily transmitted to snakes kept in captivity. In comparison with our results, Lobão et al. from Rio de Janeiro [25] detected C. parvum and C. tyzzeri in equal amounts in captive snakes. However, we have not found any author who has so far detected C. hominis in snakes, as we confirmed in the species Boiga dendrophila spp. gemmicincta, which indicates a greater risk of zoonotic potential.
There are different opinions among authors about the health risks that C. parvum possess for human health. In the review published by Šlapeta [35], this parasite species can be considered of minor public health significance, as the author stated that there was only one recorded case of C. parvum in humans to date. However, a more recent study conducted by Ryan et al. [36] stated that out of all currently recognized Cryptosporidium species, 19 species and 4 genotypes have been reported in humans, with C. hominis, C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. canis and C. felis being the most prevalent. Given these conflicting perspectives, we recommend exercising caution and adhering to safety measures when collecting and analyzing samples, to prevent the spread of oocysts and contamination. Notably, two of our samples tested positive for the presence of Cryptosporidium parvum: one obtained from an Oligodon octolineatus specimen caught in Indonesia and another from a Trimeresurus insularis specimen, also caught in Indonesia.

5. Conclusions

Employing modern molecular methods, we conducted a screening for the presence of cryptosporidial oocysts in the feces of snakes captured from the wild, intended for sale. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of these molecular techniques in detecting cryptosporidial infections, even in asymptomatic individuals, highlighting the importance of screening wild-caught reptiles for parasitic diseases before they enter trade and are placed into private collections. It is also important to emphasize that, since a single negative PCR result based on one-time fecal testing may yield false negative results, it is essential that breeders and all individuals in contact with such animals remain cautious.
Our approach provides a valuable tool for ensuring the health and welfare of reptiles in captivity, offering an early detection system for potential health risks. For all snakes involved in this study, antiparasitics were recommended as a preventive measure against cryptosporidial infections, as well as other diseases, such as helminthiasis. Although no snake-specific Cryptosporidium species were found in the analyzed samples, the identified species may still pose a risk to humans, which should be considered when working with wild reptiles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P., V.P. and M.S.; methodology, M.S.; software, M.S.; validation, M.S.; formal analysis, M.S. and M.P.; investigation, M.P. and M.S.; resources, M.S.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and M.S.; visualization, M.S. and M.P.; supervision, M.S. and M.P.; project administration, M.S.; funding acquisition, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, grant number VEGA 1/0161/23.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Collection of biological material from animals approved by the The Ethics Committee for Animal Procedures at the University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice (permission No. EkvP/2023-09). Facility for the breeding or keeping of dangerous animals at the University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice (No. SK NZ 0010/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
bpA base pair
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
kDa Kilodalton
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
spp.Species

References

  1. Brener, B.; Burgarelli, E.; Suarez, M.; Keidel, L. Cryptosporidiosis in Reptiles from Brazil: An Update for Veterinary Medicine. Parasitologia 2022, 2, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bogan, J.E. Gastric Cryptosporidiosis in Snakes, a Review. J. Herpetol. Med. Surg. 2019, 29, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Zoonotic Potential and Molecular Epidemiology of Giardia Species and Giardiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 110–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thompson, R.C.A.; Ash, A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections—What’s new? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 75, 103951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, L.; Ryan, U.M.; Graczyk, T.K.; Limor, J.; Li, L.; Kombert, M.; Junge, R.; Sulaiman, I.M.; Zhou, L.; Arrowood, M.J.; et al. Genetic Diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in Captive Reptiles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fall, A.; Thompson, R.C.A.; Hobbs, R.P.; Morgan-Ryan, U. Morphology is not a reliable tool for delineating species within Cryptosporidium. J. Parasitol. 2003, 89, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Plutzer, J.; Karanis, P. Molecular identification of a Cryptosporidium saurophilum from corn snake (Elaphe guttata guttata). Parasitol. Res. 2007, 101, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gracenea, M.; Gomez, M.S.; Torres, J.; Carne, E.; Fernández-Morán, J. Transmission dynamics of Cryptosporidium in primates and herbivores at the Barcelona zoo: A long-term study. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 104, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Samuel, W.M.; Pybus, M.J.; Kocan, A.A. Parasitic Diseases of Wild Mammals, 2nd ed.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sorrell, G.; Boback, S.; Reed, R.; Green, S.; Montgomery, C.; De Souza, L.; Chiaraviglio, M. Boa Constrictor (Boa Constrictor). Foraging Behavior. Herpetol. Rev. 2011, 42, 281. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ecology Asia, Vertebrate Fauna of Southeast Asia. Available online: https://www.ecologyasia.com/verts/snakes/dog-toothed_cat-snake.htm (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  12. Thailand Snakes The Ultimate Herping Experience. Available online: https://thailandsnakes.com/dog-toothed-cat-snake/ (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  13. Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute. Available online: https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/mangrove-snake (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  14. Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/animal/brown-tree-snake (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  15. Henderson, R.; Pauers, M. On the Diets of Neotropical Treeboas (Squamata: Boidae: Corallus). S. Am. J. Herpetol. 2012, 7, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/animal/flying-snake (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  17. Reptile Care Database. Available online: http://www.reptile-care.de/species/Serpentes/Colubridae/Gonyosoma-janseni.html (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  18. Ecology Asia, Vertebrate Fauna of Southeast Asia. Available online: https://www.ecologyasia.com/verts/snakes/eight-striped_kukri_snake.htm (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  19. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/178038/7489272#habitat-ecology (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  20. Hongkongsnakeid. Available online: https://www.hongkongsnakeid.com/insular-pit-viper (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  21. Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exp. Parasitol. 2010, 124, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bouzid, M.; Hunter, P.R.; Chalmers, R.M.; Tyler, K.M. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 115–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Karasawa, A.S.M.; da Silva, R.J.; Mascarini, L.M.; Barrella, T.H.; de Magalhães Lopes, C.A. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium (Apicomplexa, Cryptosporidiidae) in Crotalus durissus terrificus (Serpentes, Viperidae) in Brazil. Memórias Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2002, 97, 779–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Graczyk, T.K.; Fayer, R.; Cranfield, M.R. Cryptosporidium parvum is not transmissible to fish, amphibians, or reptiles. J. Parasitol. 1996, 82, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lobão, L.F.; Corrêa, L.L.; Bruno, S.F.; da Silva, S.; Uchôa, C.M.A.; da Silva Barbosa, A. Diagnosis of endoparasite species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. with one health importance, in feces from captive snakes in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Parasitol. Int. 2023, 97, 102797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mendoza-Roldan, J.A.; Perles, L.; Filippi, E.; Szafranski, N.; Montinaro, G.; Carbonara, M.; Scalera, R.; de Abreu Teles, P.P.; Walochnik, J.; Otranto, D. Parasites and microorganisms associated with the snakes collected for the “festa Dei serpari” in Cocullo, Italy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2024, 18, e0011973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. O’Hanlon, B.M.; Bogan, J.E.; Godwin, J.C.; Hoffman, M.; Smith, L.L.; Chandler, H.C.; Talley, B.L. Cryptosporidium serpentis Surveillance in Free-Ranging Snakes to Inform a Reintroduction Strategy for the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi). J. Wildl. Dis. 2023, 59, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arabkhazaeli, F.; Rostami, A.; Gilvari, A.; Nabian, S.; Madani, S.A. Frequently observed parasites in pet reptiles’ feces in Tehran. Iran. J. Vet. Med. 2018, 12, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Lin, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Qian, W.; Lv, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Qi, M.; Xia, Z. Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in pet snakes in Beijing, China. J. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3119–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chai, Y.; Liu, H.; Deng, L.; Bi, B.; Yao, J.; Yang, X.; Zhong, Z.; Fu, H.; Shen, L.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium serpentis in Captive Snakes in China. J. Parasitol. 2021, 107, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; He, L.; Xiao, G.; Tian, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, T.; Ou, Q.; Chen, H.; Hwong, Y.; et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in captive snakes from 26 provinces in China: Prevalence, molecular characterization, and symptoms. J. Parasite 2024, 31, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Mayer, C.; Lee, J.; Carossino, M.; Nevarez, J.G. Retrospective study of morbidity and mortality in a captive population of cryptosporidium-positive louisiana pine snakes (Pituophis ruthveni). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2024, 55, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. de Oliveira Toledo, F.A.; Alves, P.V.; Arthuso Vasconcelos, I.M.; Oliveira, A.R.; Dos Santos, D.O.; Gomes Cabral, J.A.; Righi de Toledo, R.A.; Pinto, H.A.; Henriques Cunha, P.H.; Oliveira Paes Leme, F.; et al. Parasitologic and pathologic study of free-ranging south american rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus terrificus) in brazil. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2022, 53, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hallinger, M.J.; Taubert, A.; Hermosilla, C. Occurrence of Kalicephalus, Strongyloides, and Rhabdias nematodes as most common gastrointestinal parasites in captive snakes of German households and zoological gardens. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Šlapeta, J. Cryptosporidiosis and Cryptosporidium species in animals and humans: A thirty colour rainbow? Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 957–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ryan, U.; Zahedi, A.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. An Update on Zoonotic Cryptosporidium Species and Genotypes in Humans. J. Anim. 2021, 11, 3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. General information about the studied snake species.
Table 1. General information about the studied snake species.
Snake SpeciesNumber of
Snakes Examined
Country of OriginFeeding EcologyThe Site of
Snake Collection
References
Boa constrictor
(Common boa)
2Central and South AmericaLarge lizards, small- or moderate-sized birds, opossums, bats, mongooses, rats, and squirrelsSurinam[10]
Boiga cynodon
(Dog-toothed cat snake)
2Asian palm plantationsSmall birds of all sorts and bird eggs, lizards and small bats, chickens, eggs; captive animals: miceIndonesia[11,12]
Boiga gemmicincta
(Mangrove snake)
2Sulawesi and surrounding islandsBirds, rodents, reptiles (including lizards and other snakes), amphibians (frogs), fishIndonesia[13]
Boiga irregularis
(Brown Tree Snake)
3Throughout subtropical and tropical eastern and northern AustraliaLarge variety of vertebrate prey items (Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia);
feeds on carrion
Indonesia[14]
Genus Corallus
(Tree boas)
2From southeastern Guatemala, in Central America, to southeastern Brazil, in South AmericaLizards, birds, and small mammals (marsupials, rodents, and bats)Surinam[15]
Chrysopelea paradisi
(Paradise flying snake)
7Southeast Asia, India, western Indonesia, PhilippinesTree-dwelling, lizards, birds, rodents, and batsIndonesia[16]
Gonyosoma janseni
(Black-tailed Ratsnake)
5Sulawesi (Indonesia), adjacent island SalayarRodents, birds, hatchlings and possibly lizardsIndonesia[17]
Oligodon octolineatus
(Striped Kukri Snake)
2Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Borneo, Brunei and the Indonesian islands of Sumatra, Bangka, Bali, Java, Sulawesi, PhilippinesFrogs, lizards, other snakes and eggs of frogs, reptiles and birdsIndonesia[18]
Trimeresurus insularis
(Indonesian pit viper)
15Indonesia and Timor-LesteRodents, lizards, and small birdsIndonesia[19,20]
Table 2. The results of the analysis of the examined samples confirmed by sequencing.
Table 2. The results of the analysis of the examined samples confirmed by sequencing.
Snake SpeciesCountry of OriginPositivity/
Negativity
Number of
Positive Samples of
the Given Species
Cryptosporidium spp.GenBank
Accession
Numbers
Allelic
Family
B. constrictorSurinam0
C. caninusSurinam+1C. tyzzeriPV656777IXb
C. hortulanusSurinam+1C. tyzzeriPV656778IXb
B. cynodonIndonesia0
B. dendrophila spp. gemmicinctaIndonesia+2C. hominisPV656780
PV656781
Ia
Ia
B. irregularisIndonesia0
Ch. paradisiIndonesia0
G. janseniIndonesia0
O. octolineatusIndonesia+1C. parvumPV656779IIa
Table 3. Overview of the occurrence of cryptosporidium spp. in snakes worldwide.
Table 3. Overview of the occurrence of cryptosporidium spp. in snakes worldwide.
Country of Sample AnalysisLivingSpecies of Positive SnakesParasite DetectedReferences
Rio de JaneiroIn captivityBothrops spp., Crotalus durissus, Lachesis mutaC. parvum,
C. tyzzeri
[25]
ItalyIn captivityE. quatuorlineata,
H. viridiflavus
Cryptosporidium spp.—too short for reliable species identification[26]
FloridaWildlife,
In captivity
Drymarchon couperiC. serpentis[27]
TehranIn captivityMacrovipera lebetina obtusa,
Echis carinatus sochureki,
Ophiophagus hannah
Cryptosporidium spp.[28]
ChinaIn captivitypet snake species, Elaphe guttata, Elaphe obsoleta, Pituophis melanoleucus, Thamnophis sirtalis, Lampropeltis getulus, Heterodon nasicusC. serpentis,
C. varanii
[29,30,31]
LouisianaIn captivityPituophis ruthveniC. serpentis[32]
Minas Gerais (southeast Brazil)WildlifeCrotalus durissus terrificusCryptosporidium spp.[33]
GermanyIn captivitypet snake speciesCryptosporidium spp.[34]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Polláková, M.; Sučik, M.; Petrilla, V. Molecular Detection of Different Species of Cryptosporidium in Snakes from Surinam and Indonesia. Animals 2025, 15, 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111556

AMA Style

Polláková M, Sučik M, Petrilla V. Molecular Detection of Different Species of Cryptosporidium in Snakes from Surinam and Indonesia. Animals. 2025; 15(11):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Polláková, Magdaléna, Monika Sučik, and Vladimír Petrilla. 2025. "Molecular Detection of Different Species of Cryptosporidium in Snakes from Surinam and Indonesia" Animals 15, no. 11: 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111556

APA Style

Polláková, M., Sučik, M., & Petrilla, V. (2025). Molecular Detection of Different Species of Cryptosporidium in Snakes from Surinam and Indonesia. Animals, 15(11), 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop