Taste Preferences in Broilers: Effect of Age, Delivery Matrix, and Number of Chickens per Pen on Selection and Consumption Behaviour
Abstract
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals, Housing, and Diets
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Taste Preference Analysis
2.4. Consumption Behaviour Analysis
- Time of approach (TA): The period in which a bird was at the edge observing the matrix. It began when the animal approached the source offered for consumption and ended when it turned around, walked away, or lay down;
- Number of bouts (NB): The number of bouts recorded within the TA;
- Duration of bouts (DB): Active consumption with no break of more than 10 s between pecks;
- Number of pecks (NP): The number of pecks made by a bird to the matrix offered. Regarding the consumption of solid sources, it was observed as a hammer-like head downward and back upward movement. Regarding the consumption of liquid sources, it was observed as a downward head movement and upward glance and then back to its original position.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Age
3.2. Delivery Matrix
3.3. Number of Chickens
3.4. Age × Matrix × Chickens
3.5. Broilers Preference for Sapid Compounds
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Goff, S.; Klee, h. Plant volatile compounds: Sensory cues for health and nutritional value?: Plant volatiles: From chemistry to communication. Science 2006, 311, 815–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roura, E.; Humphrey, B.; Tedó, G.; Ipharraguerre, I. Unfolding the codes of short-term feed appetence in farm and companion animals. A comparative oronasal nutrient sensing biology review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 88, 535–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajapaksha, P.; Wang, Z.; Venkatesan, N.; Tehrani, K.; Payne, J.; Swetenburg, R.; Kawabata, F.; Tabata, S.; Mortensen, L.; Stice, L.; et al. Labeling and analysis of chicken taste buds using molecular markers in oral epithelial sheets. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niknafs, S.; Roura, E. Nutrient sensing, taste, and feed intake in avian species. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2018, 31, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tehrani, K.; Pendleton, E.; Tanaka, R.; Mortensen, L.; Nishimura, S.; Tabata, S.; Liu, H.; Kawabata, F. Bitter taste receptor T2R7 and umami taste receptor subunit T1R1 are expressed highly in Vimentin-negative taste bud cells in chickens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 511, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roura, E.; Baldwin, M.W.; Klasing, K.C. The avian taste system: Potential implications in poultry nutrition. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2013, 180, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palomar, M.; Soler, M.; Roura, E.; Sala, R.; Piquer, O.; Garcés-Narro, C. Degree of saturation and free fatty acid content of fats determine dietary preference in hens. Animals 2020, 10, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacobs, H.; Scott, H. Factors Mediating Food and Liquid Intake in Chickens: 1. Studies on the Preference for Sucrose or Saccharine Solutions. Poult. Sci. 1957, 36, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchell, R.; Strom, L.; Zotterman, Y. Electrophysiological studies of thermal and taste reception in chickens and pigeons. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1959, 46, 133–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, A.; Downs, C. Food preferences of Knysna and purple-crested turacos fed varying concentrations of equicaloric and equimolar artificial fruit. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 21, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentle, M. Taste and its importance to the domestic chicken. Bri. Poult. Sci. 1971, 12, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, Y.; Kawabata, Y.; Kawabata, F.; Nishimura, S.; Tabata, S. Expression of multiple umami taste receptors in oral and gastrointestinal tissues, and umami taste synergism in chickens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 466, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuerst, W.; Kare, M. The influence of pH on fluid tolerance and preferences. Poult. Sci. 1962, 41, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentle, M.; Dewar, W. The effects of vitamin A deficiency on oral gustatory behavior in chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 1981, 22, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Classen, H. Diet energy and feed intake in chicken behaviour. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2017, 233, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.; Kim, J.; Roura, E. A new double choice model developed in laying hens reveals high performance for L-alanine. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, Australia, 14–17 February 2016; The Poultry Research Foundation—The World’s Poultry Science Association: Brownlow Hill, Australia, 2016; p. 95. [Google Scholar]
- Collins, L.; Sumpter, D. The feeding dynamics of broiler chickens. J. R. Soc. Interfac. 2017, 4, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheled-Shoval, S.; Reicher, N.; Niv, M.; Uni, Z. Detecting Thresholds for Bitter, Umami, and Sweet Tastants in Broiler Chicken Using a 2-choice Test Method. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 2206–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iqbal, A.; Navarro, M.; Roura, E. Effectiveness of a double choice test to assess dietary taste preferences in broiler chickens. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, Australia, 13–15 February 2017; The Poultry Research Foundation—The World’s Poultry Science Association: Brownlow Hill, Australia, 2017; p. 243. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pursewell, J.; Magee, C. Effects of feeder space on broiler feeding behaviors. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aviagen. Ross 308 Broiler: Nutrition Specifications. 2022. Available online: https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerNutritionSpecifications2022-EN.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2024).
- Cordero, P.; Díaz-Avilés, F.; Torres, P.; Guzmán, M.; Niknafs, S.; Roura, E.; Guzmán-Pino, S.A. The Expression of Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Receptors Show an Age-Dependent Pattern Involving Oral Cavity, Jejunum and Lower Gut Sensing in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2023, 13, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aviagen. Ross 308 Broiler: Management Pocket Guide. 2022. Available online: https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/BB_Foreign_Language_Docs/Spanish_TechDocs/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-ES.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2024).
- Guzmán-Pino, S.; Lazcano, C.; De Luca, V.; Figueroa, J.; Valenzuela, C.; Roura, E. Dietary Inclusion of Monosodium Glutamate in Gestating and Lactating Sows Modifies the Preference Thresholds and Sensory-Motivated Intake for Umami and Sweet Solutions in Post-Weaned Pigs. Animals 2019, 9, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueroa, J.; Valenzuela, C.; Guzmán-Pino, S. Sucrose Inclusion in Gestating and Lactating Diets of Sows Modifies the Feeding Behavior of Post-Weaning Pigs for Sweet Solutions. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shynkaruk, T.; Classen, H.; Crowe, T.; Schwean-Lardner, K. The impact of dark exposure on broiler feeding behaviour and weight of gastrointestinal tract segment contents. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2448–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aldridge, D.; Scanes, C.; Kidd, M. Performance and preference of broilers provided dual light warmth. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2021, 30, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, P.; Zhang, J. Contrasting Modes of Evolution between Vertebrate Sweet/umami Receptor Genes and Bitter Receptor Genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Urata, K.; Manda, M.; Watanabe, S. Behavioral Study on Taste Responses of Hens and Female Japanese Quails to Salty, Sour, Sweet, Bitter and Umami Solutions. Anim. Sci. Technol. 1992, 63, 325–331. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Hoon, M.; Chandrashekar, J.; Mueller, L.K.; Cook, B.; Wu, D.; Zuker, C.S.; Ryba, N.J.P. Coding of Sweet, Bitter, and Umami Tastes: Different Receptor Cells Sharing Similar Signaling Pathways. Cell 2003, 112, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sukumaran, S.; Yee, K.; Iwata, S.; Kotha, R.; Quezada-Calvillo, R.; Nichols, B.; Mohan, S. Taste Cell-Expressed α-Glucosidase Enzymes Contribute to Gustatory Responses to Disaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6035–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yasumatsu, K.; Ohkuri, T.; Yoshida, R.; Iwata, S.; Margolskee, R.; Ninomiya, Y. Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 1 as a Sugar Taste Sensor in Mouse Tongue. Acta Physiol. 2020, 230, e13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damak, S.; Rong, M.; Yasumatsu, K.; Kokrashvili, Z.; Varadarajan, V.; Zou, S.; Jiang, P.; Ninomiya, N.; Margolskee, R. Detection of Sweet and Umami Taste in the Absence of Taste Receptor T1r3. Science 2003, 301, 850–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusuhara, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Ohkuri, T.; Yasumatsu, K.; Voigt, A.; Hübner, S.; Maeda, K.; Boehm, U.; Meyerhof, W.; Ninomiya, Y. Taste Responses in Mice Lacking Taste Receptor Subunit T1R1. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 1967–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasumatsu, K.; Manabe, T.; Yoshida, R.; Iwatsuki, K.; Uneyama, H.; Takahashi, I.; Ninomiya, Y. Involvement of Multiple Taste Receptors in Umami Taste: Analysis of Gustatory Nerve Responses in Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 4 Knockout Mice. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 1021–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, Y.; Kawabata, F.; Kawabata, Y.; Nishimura, S.; Tabata, S. Short-term Perception of and Conditioned Taste Aversion to Umami Taste, and Oral Expression Patterns of Umami Taste Receptors in Chickens. Physiol. Behav. 2018, 191, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Compound | Concentration | 2 h | 4 h | 8 h | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preference (%) | SEM | p-Value | Preference (%) | SEM | p-Value | Preference (%) | SEM | p-Value | ||
Sucrose | 1 mM | 58.9 | 8.0 | 0.306 | 56.6 | 5.4 | 0.259 | 55.3 | 5.0 | 0.323 |
50 mM | 40.6 | 7.7 | 0.259 | 40.7 | 5.5 | 0.132 | 43.9 | 5.2 | 0.284 | |
100 mM | 66.8 * | 5.9 | 0.025 | 61.0 | 5.6 | 0.088 | 55.0 | 5.1 | 0.357 | |
200 mM | 49.9 | 6.1 | 0.995 | 47.3 | 4.3 | 0.549 | 47.9 | 5.7 | 0.723 | |
MSG | 1 mM | 60.7 | 5.2 | 0.080 | 53.4 | 3.9 | 0.418 | 51.1 | 4.5 | 0.817 |
75 mM | 50.1 | 5.5 | 0.991 | 48.3 | 4.3 | 0.696 | 49.5 | 4.3 | 0.913 | |
150 mM | 62.3 | 5.9 | 0.077 | 61.9 * | 4.2 | 0.026 | 62.2 * | 3.7 | 0.013 | |
300 mM | 66.4 * | 4.9 | 0.013 | 59.2 | 5.3 | 0.128 | 45.8 | 4.4 | 0.369 | |
L-lysine | 0.1% | 58.9 | 6.1 | 0.181 | 49.9 | 7.9 | 0.994 | 55.8 | 4.1 | 0.202 |
1% | 51.7 | 12.6 | 0.898 | 43.9 | 7.1 | 0.421 | 47.6 | 5.2 | 0.652 | |
3.5% | 53.5 | 6.5 | 0.608 | 63.9 | 7.3 | 0.099 | 56.2 | 3.9 | 0.154 | |
7% | 46.6 | 8.9 | 0.711 | 43.6 | 6.4 | 0.354 | 39.9 | 6.5 | 0.165 | |
CaCO3 | 0.1% | 50.8 | 5.6 | 0.898 | 50.9 | 4.6 | 0.854 | 53.3 | 3.5 | 0.375 |
1% | 55.6 | 9.4 | 0.573 | 53.8 | 6.3 | 0.571 | 53.4 | 5.7 | 0.573 | |
5% | 55.2 | 6.3 | 0.438 | 49.8 | 5.5 | 0.967 | 52.0 | 3.5 | 0.588 | |
10% | 63.1 | 9.7 | 0.219 | 51.7 | 10.5 | 0.874 | 55.2 | 6.9 | 0.472 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cordero, P.; Herrera-Alcaíno, S.; Philp, V.; Muñoz, G.; Luna, D.; Guzmán-Pino, S.A. Taste Preferences in Broilers: Effect of Age, Delivery Matrix, and Number of Chickens per Pen on Selection and Consumption Behaviour. Animals 2024, 14, 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101507
Cordero P, Herrera-Alcaíno S, Philp V, Muñoz G, Luna D, Guzmán-Pino SA. Taste Preferences in Broilers: Effect of Age, Delivery Matrix, and Number of Chickens per Pen on Selection and Consumption Behaviour. Animals. 2024; 14(10):1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101507
Chicago/Turabian StyleCordero, Paloma, Sofía Herrera-Alcaíno, Victoria Philp, Geraldine Muñoz, Daniela Luna, and Sergio A. Guzmán-Pino. 2024. "Taste Preferences in Broilers: Effect of Age, Delivery Matrix, and Number of Chickens per Pen on Selection and Consumption Behaviour" Animals 14, no. 10: 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101507
APA StyleCordero, P., Herrera-Alcaíno, S., Philp, V., Muñoz, G., Luna, D., & Guzmán-Pino, S. A. (2024). Taste Preferences in Broilers: Effect of Age, Delivery Matrix, and Number of Chickens per Pen on Selection and Consumption Behaviour. Animals, 14(10), 1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101507