Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Supplementation with Betaine and Zinc on In Vitro Large Intestinal Fermentation in Iberian Pigs under Heat Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Parity, Body Condition Score at Calving, and Milk Yield on the Metabolic Profile of Gyr Cows in the Transition Period
Previous Article in Journal
Electroencephalogram and Physiological Responses as Affected by Slaughter Empathy in Goats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Dietary Organic Acids and Botanicals on Metabolic Status and Milk Parameters in Mid–Late Lactating Goats
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

In Vivo and In Vitro Expression of iC1, a Methylation-Controlled J Protein (MCJ) in Bovine Liver, and Response to In Vitro Bovine Fatty Liver Disease Model

Animals 2023, 13(6), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061101
by Shanti Choudhary 1, Michelle LaCasse 1, Ratan Kumar Choudhary 1, Mercedes Rincon 2, Donald C. Beitz 3 and Eric D. Testroet 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Animals 2023, 13(6), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061101
Submission received: 18 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published: 20 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Disorder Diseases of Ruminants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper fits well with the scope of the journal. However, in my opinion, it has some shortcomings in this current form. In particular, my concerns are:

 

- manuscript need to be consistent with the journal reference style (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals/instructions)

- reference section need to be checked

Specific comments:

LL61-63: please include citation, for example you can read and cite 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1990804

L71: citation?

LL73-74: include citation (e.g., 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2032850)

LL83-84: Paper Malhi et al 2006 is not consistent with the reference section

Reference Chavez-Tapia et al., 2011 is not mentioned in the text

Author Response

The paper fits well with the scope of the journal. However, in my opinion, it has some shortcomings in this current form. In particular, my concerns are:

 

- manuscript need to be consistent with the journal reference style (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals/instructions)

AU: Thank you for the comment.  The references have been fixed. 

- reference section need to be checked

Specific comments:
AU: added


LL61-63: please include citation, for example you can read and cite 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1990804
AU: Reference added

L71: citation? –

 

AU: Reference included


LL73-74: include citation (e.g., 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2032850)

AU: Reference included

LL83-84: Paper Malhi et al 2006 is not consistent with the reference section

AU: Needful done.

Reference Chavez-Tapia et al., 2011 is not mentioned in the text

AU: Reference of Chavez-Tapia has been added (in line no L105)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Same as below

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In the present manuscript, the authors investigate the expression of Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor (iC1) in bovine liver and its possible role in fatty liver disease (FLD) development. This would be of potential importance, but there are several deficiencies that need to be addressed or clarified for further improvement of the manuscript.

 

1.     In Figure 1c and d, the authors evaluated lipid droplet by Oil Red O stain. More inflammation parameters should be investigated in order to establish the in vitro bovine fatty liver disease model.

2.     In Figure 1, Figure 3c and d, please add a scale bar for all panels.

3.     In Figure 1b, alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive is typically used to characterize smooth muscle cells. Please explain why it is used to characterize stellate cells.

4.     In Figure 2d, please add an error bar accordingly.

5.     Closer attention needs to be paid to small details. For example, Introduction, Line 1, "Non-communicable diseases greatly increased than Communicable diseases". Communicable should not be capitalized. Please revise the whole manuscript carefully.

Author Response

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In the present manuscript, the authors investigate the expression of Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor (iC1) in bovine liver and its possible role in fatty liver disease (FLD) development. This would be of potential importance, but there are several deficiencies that need to be addressed or clarified for further improvement of the manuscript.

 

  1. In Figure 1c and d, the authors evaluated lipid droplet by Oil Red O stain. More inflammation parameters should be investigated in order to establish the in vitro bovine fatty liver disease model.

AU: Accumulation of lipid droplet is good in vitro model to study pathophysiological changes seen in hepatic steatosis (Nutrients 2023, 15(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15010040).

  1. In Figure 1, Figure 3c and d, please add a scale bar for all panels.

AU: Magnification of the images are duly mentioned over the picture.

  1. In Figure 1b, alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive is typically used to characterize smooth muscle cells. Please explain why it is used to characterize stellate cells.

AU: Alpha smooth muscle actin is a definite marker of hepatic stem cells has been added with appropriate references (line 227-228; Ref # 21,22). Thank you.

  1. In Figure 2d, please add an error bar accordingly.

AU: Needful done.

  1. Closer attention needs to be paid to small details. For example, Introduction, Line 1, "Non-communicable diseases greatly increased than Communicable diseases". Communicable should not be capitalized. Please revise the whole manuscript carefully.

AU: Manuscript has been revised thoroughly for such mistakes. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have responded to all the comments raised in the previous review. From my point of view, the manuscript can be published. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your time in critically evaluating our manuscript.

Ratan

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have addressed most of my comments.

There is a comment regarding the sampling collection process (Line 118) that hasn't been addressed. It's important for authors to describe the features of the animals, such as parity and stage of lactation, that were sampled since these important factors can affect liver cells physiology, altering morphology and structure of these cells, especially when referring to fatty liver disease. If the authors don't posses that information, this should be mentioned as a pitfall of the study.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for pointing out your concern. Specifically, 

There is a comment regarding the sampling collection process (Line 118) that hasn't been addressed.

AU: We have addressed that concern and added information that samples were collected from a culled and dead animal (Line no 123-125).

It's important for authors to describe the features of the animals, such as parity and stage of lactation, that were sampled since these important factors can affect liver cells physiology, altering morphology and structure of these cells, especially when referring to fatty liver disease. If the authors don't posses that information, this should be mentioned as a pitfall of the study.

AU: We agree with your concern. To address this, we have included a statement in lines 266-270. Manuscript is attached (PDF file to verify my claims).

We believe that these changes made in the revised manuscript would be acceptable to you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop