Next Article in Journal
Drivers of Three Most Charismatic Mammalian Species Distribution across a Multiple-Use Tropical Forest Landscape of Sumatra, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Clostridium butyricum and Its Culture Supernatant Alleviate the Escherichia coli-Induced Endometritis in Mice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Oat Hull as a Source of Insoluble Dietary Fibre on Changes in the Microbial Status of Gastrointestinal Tract in Broiler Chickens

Animals 2022, 12(19), 2721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192721
by Patrycja Wróblewska 1, Tomasz Hikawczuk 2, Kamil Sierżant 1, Andrzej Wiliczkiewicz 1 and Anna Szuba-Trznadel 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Animals 2022, 12(19), 2721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192721
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 10 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Anna Szuba-Trznadel

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper investigated an interesting topic very important for poultry nutrition and production, and this research fits well within the overall scope of the section Animal Nutrition of Animals.

However, before a possible acceptance of the manuscript, a huge work of revision is need. 

In the present form, the manuscript is quite hard to read and follow. Thus, I suggest to revise the full-text in the first istance for English language. It is unuseful at this stage to report each single language correction.

Moreover, the Abstract is quite confusing: it should be reduced and it needs a conclusive sentence stressing breafly the overall findings of the study and their usefulness and application (this is the same for Conclusion section).

Also, it is necessary to check if ALL references have been cited in the references list or reported in the full-text...moreover, some additional references of recently published paper may add value to the Introduction and Discussion sections.

Finally, the Tables result quite harrd to follow.

So, I recommend major revision before a possible acceptance of this paper.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Anna Szuba-Trznadel

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The article was improved and no serious flaws remains.

Reviewer 2 Report

The Authors have done a good work of revision.

Back to TopTop