Next Article in Journal
Cinnamaldehyde Induces Release of Cholecystokinin and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 by Interacting with Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 in a Porcine Ex-Vivo Intestinal Segment Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Seroprevalence of Equine Herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) and Equine Herpesvirus 4 (EHV-4) in the Northern Moroccan Horse Populations
Previous Article in Journal
miR-126 Controls the Apoptosis and Proliferation of Immature Porcine Sertoli Cells by Targeting the PIK3R2 Gene through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for the Detection of Equine Viral Pathogens
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serological Evidence of Common Equine Viral Infections in a Semi-Isolated, Unvaccinated Population of Hucul Horses

1
Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa
3
Grove Referrals, Fakenham NR21 8JG, UK
4
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy with the Division of Laboratory Diagnostics, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
5
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
6
Chair and Department of Physiology, School of Medicine with Dentistry Division in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(8), 2261; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082261
Received: 17 June 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 29 July 2021 / Published: 30 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Virus Infection in Equine)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The aim of the following research was an analysis of the occurrence of common equine viral infections in a Hucul herd, based on serological studies. This study provides epidemiological data concerning animals representing a semi-isolated herd, devoid of any specific prophylaxis. The obtained results provide a source of information on a primitive breed of horses, as well as giving an insight into viruses (among them, arboviruses) circulating within a local ecosystem.

Abstract

Huculs (Equus caballus) are an old breed of primitive mountain horses, originating from the Carpathian Mountains. To the best of our knowledge, data concerning the epidemiology of viral infections observed within this breed are sparse. The objective of this study was to estimate the serological status of a semi-isolated, unvaccinated Hucul herd, with respect to both common equine viral infections and horse-infecting arboviruses, the presence of which was previously reported in Poland. Twenty horses of the Hucul breed, living in a remote area in Poland, were studied in 2018 from March to May. Using nasal secretion swabs as a specimen source, isolation attempts were negative regarding ERAV, EHV-1, EAV, and EIV. According to the virus neutralisation method, in the sera obtained from the animals, antibodies against the following viruses were detected: EHV-1 in 12 horses (60%; with titres from 1:8 to 1:64), EIV A/H7N7 in 13 (65%; titres from 1:20 to 1:80), EIV A /H3N8 in 12 (60%; titres from 1:20 to 1:80), USUV in 5 (25%; titres from 1:10 to 1:80), and ERAV in 1 (5%; titre 1:32). Antibodies against EAV, EIAV, and WNV were not present in the tested sera. The detected presence of specific antibodies associated with five out of the eight equine viruses investigated indicates that the Hucul herd, due to its partial separation and lack of specific prophylaxis, could serve as a sentinel animal group for the detection of equine viruses/arboviruses present within the local ecosystem. The detection of common equine viral infections within the herd provides additional epidemiological data concerning the breed.

1. Introduction

Huculs (Equus caballus), also known as Carpathian horses or Carpathian ponies, are a breed of primitive, small, mountain horses [1]. This old breed originates from the region of the eastern part of the Carpathian Mountains, and the first written material concerning these animals dates back to the beginning of the 17th century [1,2]. It is assumed that Huculs may be descendants of Tarpan horses mixed with Arabian horses, as well as Lipican, Hafling, Norik breed, and Fordwhich [2]. Since the Hucul horse is classified as a small-numbered breed, it has been a part of the FAO Program for the Preservation of Animal Genetic Resources [3]. Huculs are distinguished by their incredible strength, vitality, and resistance to harsh weather conditions; therefore, they can be kept on pastures throughout the year [1]. They are also known for their excellent health, including disease resistance, as well as for their high fertility and longevity [3,4]. The data concerning this breed are sparse (28 records in PubMed). To the best of our knowledge, epidemiological information in the form of only two papers exclusively reporting equine viral arteritis (EVA) infections is available for these animals [5,6].
The most common viral infections observed in equids are caused by viral agents belonging to different taxonomic families, including equine arteritis virus (EAV, Arteriviridae), equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1, Herpesviridae), equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV, Picornaviridae), and equine influenza A virus (EIV, Orthomyxoviridae) [7,8]. Additionally, when it comes to these animals, infections caused by Usutu virus (USUV, Flaviviridae), West Nile virus (WNV, Flaviviridae), and equine infectious anaemia virus (EIAV, Retroviridae) are of recently increasing importance [9,10].
Equine viral arteritis (EVA), caused by EAV, is a global infectious disease of horses characterised by abortion in pregnant mares. Other clinical signs like anorexia, depression, conjunctivitis, respiratory signs, and ocular discharge, as well as oedema of the eyelids, abdomen, prepuce and scrotum, or mammary glands, can also be observed [7,11]. Infection with EHV-1 is highly prevalent worldwide. Whereas it may be inapparent, in some animals it results in abortion or presents as acute rhinitis and pharyngitis, with the potential to spread into the more distal airways, leading to tracheobronchitis, bronchiolitis, and/or pneumonitis [7,12,13]. Other infections of the upper respiratory tract commonly observed in equids are caused by ERAV and the two main strains of EIV: equine-1 (H7N7) and equine-2 (H3N8) influenza A virus [14,15]. It is worth mentioning that the ERAV may also infect humans [16]. USUV and WNV are mosquito-borne zoonotic arboviruses transmitted by Culex pipiens, causing severe encephalitis and death in horses, birds, and humans [17]. The presence of antibodies to these two arboviruses, which were originally bound to Africa or Southeastern Asia, was previously confirmed in Poland in both humans and animals [9,18]. Bloodsucking insects, especially horseflies and deerflies, are EIAV vectors. In horses, symptoms of infections caused by the EIAV include high or recurrent fever, anaemia, weakness, and swelling of the lower abdomen, chest, legs, and scrotum, as well as weak pulse, irregular heartbeat, and abortion in pregnant mares. The latter disease presents no public health risk [19].
It was established that animal populations can serve as sentinels for the detection of environmental health threats [20]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the aim of sentinel surveillance is to obtain timely information in a relatively inexpensive manner, rather than to derive precise estimates of prevalence or incidence in the general population [20].
The objective of this study was to analyse the virological and immunological status of a herd of Hucul horses living in semi-natural conditions (and not vaccinated or artificially inseminated) with respect to common equine viral infections and horse-infecting arboviruses, the presence of which was previously reported in Poland. The method of maintenance and lack of medical intervention makes the studied herd, despite its small size, a useful model of sentinel animals/surveillance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The blood samples and nasal swabs used in this project were taken for the routine diagnosis of EAV infections. The methods for the specimens’ collection were carried out in accordance with article 37ah–37ak of the Pharmaceutical Law act (Dz. U. z 2015 r. poz. 266, zmienione przez Dz. U. z 2019 r. poz. 499, 399 i 959 [Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland from 2015, item 266 changed with Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland from 2019, item. 499, 399 and 959]) from September 6th 2001 and the Experiments on Animals Act (Dz. U. 2019 poz. 1392 [Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2019, item. 1392]) from 5 July 2019. In light of these regulations, approval of the Ethical Committee was not required. Informed consent was obtained from the owner of the animals.

2.2. Specimen

A herd of 20 Hucul horses in total (10 mares, 10 stallions) aged between 5 and 10 years, located in southwestern Poland (in Kalisz District, Greater Poland Voivodeship), was tested from March to May 2018. The animals had no contact with either other horses or wild equines, and they were kept on extensive pasture distant from inhabited areas throughout the year. None of the horses showed clinical symptoms at the time of sampling. There was no sign of clinical infection reported during the year prior to sampling, except for two incidents of abortion (for non-infectious reasons) and a single case of mild respiratory symptoms that was not diagnosed. All the horses were therefore considered healthy on the basis of physical examination and haematological and biochemical analyses (data not shown). None of the Huculs were vaccinated against any equine viral disease.
For serological tests, blood samples were collected from all the horses. Blood specimens were allowed to clot and were then centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min, then the obtained sera were transferred into fresh tubes. Nasal swabs taken from the animals were transported to the laboratory in tubes containing EMEM supplemented with antibiotics, at 4 °C. The swabs were processed by pressing against the tube walls and vortexing, using the transport medium. The obtained fluid was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000× g. The secured supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes.

2.3. Virus Isolation

Attempted virus isolation of EAV, EHV-1, and ERAV from nasal swabs was performed using standard isolation procedures. Twenty-four-well polystyrene plates containing rabbit kidney (RK-13, ATCC® CCL-37TM, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) or green monkey kidney (Vero, ATCC® CCL-81TM) cell lines were inoculated with the processed swab specimens (50–100 μL into each well) [21]. Plates were incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 and observed daily for 7–10 days, for the development of a cytopathic effect (CPE), using an inverted microscope (Olympus Corp., Hamburg Germany; Axio Observer, Carl Zeiss Microscopy Deutschland GmbH, Jena, Germany). In the absence of visible CPE, up to 5 blind subsequent passages were performed. Attempted virus isolation of EIV was carried out in embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) [22]. The samples from nasal swabs were inoculated into the allantoic cavities of the ECEs. After inoculation, the ECEs were kept for 4–5 days in an incubator for chicken eggs at 38 °C and then cooled at 4 °C for 24 h, opened, and examined for the presence of any changes in the embryos and on the membranes. Allantoic fluid was harvested and tested by hemagglutination assay (HA) using red blood cells from chickens (RBC aggregation was regarded as a positive result).

2.4. Serology

Sera obtained from all the horses were tested for the presence of antibodies against EAV, EHV-1, ERAV, EIV (H7N7 and H3N8), USUV, WNV, and EIAV. Virus neutralisation (VN) tests were performed using the Bucyrus, Rac-H, and V1722/70 reference strains for the detection of EAV [23], EHV1 [24], and ERAV [25], respectively. In order to detect antibodies to EIV, a haemagglutination inhibition test (HI) was carried out according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations [26] using A/equine/Miami/1/63 (H3N8) and A/equine/Prague/1/56 (H7N7) reference strains.
A microneutralisation assay was applied for the detection of antibodies against USUV and WNV, using the previously described procedure [9,27]. The presence of precipitating antibodies against the EIAV gag p26 protein [28,29] was tested via the agar gel immunodiffusion test (AGID), employing a commercial Equine Infectious Anemia Antibody Test Kit LAB-EZ /EIA (Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ, USA).
All the VN and HI tests were carried out in the presence of control sera (positive and negative) from the in-house collection.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted in PQStat version 1.6.8 (PQ Stat Software, Poznań, Poland) at a significance level of 5% using Fisher’s test. The correlation between the age and seropositivity to individual pathogens was evaluated. For this purpose, the animals were divided by age into two groups: 5 years old (group of youngest horses in the herd) and over 5 years old.

3. Results

According to the results of the virus isolation, all the nasal swabs were negative for the presence of EAV, EHV-1, ERAV, and EIV. Specific antibodies were detected for five out of the eight examined equine viruses. Detailed results of our serological testing are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Of the 20 Huculs tested, 12 (60%) were positive for antibodies to EHV-1 with titres ranging from 1:8 to 1:32. Antibodies to equine influenza viruses A/H7N7 and A /H3N8 were found in the sera of 13 (65%) and 12 (60%) horses, respectively, with titres ranging from 1:20 to 1:80 against both viruses. USUV seropositivity was detected in five horses (25%) with titres ranging from 1:10 to 1:80. Only one (5%) animal had antibodies to ERAV (titre of 1:8). None of the horses had detectable antibody levels for EAV, EIAV, or WNV.
Statistical analysis showed no significant correlations between the variables of age group and antibody presence for viruses EHV1 (p > 0.999), ERAV (p > 0.999), H7N7 (p = 0.3498), H3N8 (p = 0.1698), and USUV (p > 0.999). Due to the negative results of the serological investigation, statistical analyses for age vs. antibody presence for EAV, WNV, and EIAV were not performed.

4. Discussion

Nasal swabs obtained from all the horses tested in this study were negative for the presence of the four common equine viruses investigated, which indicates the absence of ongoing infection with EAV, EHV-1, ERAV, or EIV at the time of swabbing.
Serum neutralising antibodies following infection with EAV have been shown to persist for years, and it was postulated that humoral immunity to this virus is long-lasting, if not lifelong [5,7]. Thus, the absence of detectable anti-EAV antibodies in the horses tested in our study indicates that they had no previous exposure to the virus, for which the main route of infection is direct contact (although spread through fomites has also been documented) [6]. Compared with our results, analysis of the largest Hucul stud in Poland (where the animals are commercially used), performed by Rola et al. in the years 2006–2008, showed the presence of antibodies to EAV in 55.1% of the horses [5]. Subsequent analysis concerning the same stud, carried out between the years 2010 and 2013, confirmed the presence of anti-EAV antibodies in 38% of the collected samples [6]. With respect to the total equid population in Poland, antibodies against EAV were detected in around 20% of the tested horses [30], and EVA was identified as a cause of 23% of abortions in mares [31]. The EAV seroprevalence reported in Europe is highly diverse. The lowest ratio was observed in the U.K. (1.3%). Reference countries in western and central Europe presented a range of seroprevalence from 14% to 20%, while in eastern Europe, it oscillated within the range of 14–75% [32,33,34,35,36,37].
EHV-1 is highly prevalent, spreads quickly among horses, and establishes a latent carrier state, which may possibly last for life. In latently infected animals, stressors, e.g., transport or pregnancy, can induce respiratory viral shedding [12,13]. The percentage of horses seropositive for EHV-1 in the population of southeastern Poland’s breeding farms, stallion herds, purchasing centres, and riding clubs ranges from 75% to 100% [38]. Compared to the situation in Poland, in Spain, only 53.9% of horses tested seropositive for EHV-1, while in the Netherlands, this proportion was even smaller, as 28.2% of the animals were positive [39,40]. In the present study, antibodies against EHV-1 were detected in 60% of the Huculs tested. Taking into consideration the facts that the spread of the virus requires direct contact and clinical symptoms suggesting viral infection were not observed within the herd, we assume that the virus might have been introduced by a previously latently infected animal.
Antibodies to ERAV were detected in only 5% of the horses tested. This relatively low level of ERAV infections is probably the result of the separation of the tested herd. In Poland, high ERAV seropositivity (72%) was reported in different breeds of horses [8]. In England, Switzerland, and Denmark, the observed ERAV seropositivity levels ranged from 2.3% to 14%; contrastingly, research showed that in Germany and the Netherlands, these values were far higher (39% to 90%) [14,16,41,42].
In the present study, a high percentage of EIV seropositivity was detected against subtypes H7N7 (65%) and H3N8 (60%). Since the first isolation in 1963 in the USA, the subtype H3N8 (Miami 63) of EIV has continued to circulate among horses, causing epidemics and minor outbreaks of equine influenza respiratory disease in Europe and North America [15,43,44]. The last major outbreak caused by H3N8 in Europe took place in 2018/2019 and involved the U.K., Ireland, France, Germany, and Belgium. While in Europe, the most commonly found is Florida clade 2, the recently reported EIV infections were caused by Florida clade 1, which had, until then, been circulating mainly in the United States [45,46].
The EIV H7N7 subtype (Prague 56) was first isolated in 1956 from horses in Eastern Europe [47]. This subtype has not been isolated since the last outbreak recorded in 1979 and was thought to be extinct. However, antibodies to this subtype are still detectable in horses, suggesting that it still circulates in equine populations [44]. During the last decade of the 20th century, H7N7-positive horses were reported in Belgium, Russia, the USA, India, and Nigeria [44,48,49]. Interestingly, in their study, Guo et al. reported that there was cross-reactivity observed within the H7 subtype influenza virus. The cross-reactivity was detected between H7N9 and subtypic viruses H7N2, H7N3, and H7N7 [50]. An analysis of khulan (Equus hemionus hemionus) in Mongolia, performed in 2015, showed that two of the tested animals were positive for the H7 virus type. While cross-reaction with the H7N9 strain was excluded in both cases, antibodies obtained from the horses were assigned as H7N7 using a protein microarray (PA) technique, but when one of the sera was additionally tested via single radial haemolysis assay, it proved to be H7N3 positive. The authors suggested co-circulation of both subtypes, which are of equine and avian origin, respectively [51]. Antibodies to the H7 protein were also detected in the same animal species in Nigeria [52], where a haemagglutination inhibition technique using H7N3 antigen was applied. Taking into the consideration the results of the above-mentioned investigations, the positive sera obtained in our study may represent remains of the circulating H7N7 equine-originating virus or the presence of other H7 subtypes, most probably of avian origin. The number of animals seropositive to both EI viruses among the Huculs tested in the present study was surprisingly high, particularly regarding the fact that these horses were not vaccinated against equine influenza and were living in isolation, without contact with other domestic animals. In the late 1980s in China, an outbreak caused by the H3N8 virus strain more closely related to avian H3 than to the equine H3 influenza virus was described [48]. Moreover, analysis of the outbreak of EI in New South Wales in 2007 suggested the potential role of birds as mechanical spreaders of the equine H3N8 virus [53]. Both scenarios equally explain the results of our investigation, yet other mechanisms of transmission of the EI viruses to the herd tested in the present study cannot be excluded.
In Europe, the USUV was isolated for the first time from bats in Germany, and the first human infection with this virus took place in Italy in 2009; three years later, in Germany, research showed that 1 out of 4200 patients had antibodies against USUV [18,54,55]. The relatively high USUV seropositivity detected in the present study corroborates the results of a survey recently carried out in Poland, where 27.98% of the tested horses were seropositive to this virus [9]. However, these results are quite different from the findings of a study conducted in Croatia, where USUV-specific neutralising antibodies were detected in 2 of the total 1380 animals [56]. The seroprevalence of USUV in European horses is highly varied. In Serbia, it was found to be only 0.3%, and in Spain, it was 1.4%; however, in Italy it was as high as 89.2% [57]
The first report of the appearance of WNV in Poland comes from the years 1995–1996, when Juricova et al. conducted research on two sparrow species and stated a relatively high prevalence (2.8% in house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and 12.1% in Eurasian tree sparrow (Passer montanus)) of anti-WNV antibodies in the sera of the tested birds [58]. In 2013 in the Czech Republic, Rudolf et al., while testing mosquitoes, found WNV strains that were genetically similar to those isolated in Austria, Italy, and Serbia, which may testify to the spreading of this virus across all of Europe [18]. In studies performed in Poland, antibodies to WNV were reported in 35.7% of avian sera [9]. Two serological surveys concerning the prevalence of WNV in horses in Poland showed the presence of the antibodies in 0.65% of sera collected before 2008 and in 15.08% of samples obtained in the years 2012–2013 [9,30]. On the contrary, all the Huculs examined in the present study were negative for anti-WNV antibody presence. WNV infections have also been confirmed in various European countries like Serbia, Croatia, Greece, Slovakia, Spain, and Albania, and the seroprevalence of this virus in horses was found to range from 2.75% to 22% [59].
The absence of detectable levels of antibodies to EIAV observed in the present study was an expected result, considering the fact that since the last confirmed case of EIAV in Poland was in 1960, and only two additional cases were reported in 2015 [60]. Between 2007 and 2014, however, outbreaks of the disease were reported in Belgium, Bosnia, Croatia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom [10], indicating a need for ongoing monitoring of the disease’s spread.
The serological data obtained for the herein-analysed small group of Hucul horses, especially information concerning the absence of antibodies against certain viruses (EAV, EIAV, and WNV), cannot be extrapolated with regard to the whole Hucul population in Poland (over 1500 animals in total [2]). In order to understand the epidemiological status of the breed in our country in a statistically appropriate manner, a larger number of analyses need to be performed.

5. Conclusions

The present study provides useful epidemiological data regarding viral infections in Hucul horses, supplementing the sparse information on the matter available to date. Partial isolation of the tested herd, in addition to the fact that it was also devoid of any specific prophylaxis, allowed us to analyse the circulation within a local ecosystem of viruses causing infections in horses. Among these investigated viruses were those transmitted via vectors. The fact that the tested animals were apparently healthy at the moment of sampling and throughout the year prior suggests that the detected antibodies are a result of earlier exposures, but it may also be related to the natural resistance of Huculs, as indicated by other authors [1,5]. In such a case, in order to recognise the epidemiology of viral infections concerning the breed, further serological surveys are required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.B., M.F. and D.S.; Data analysis, B.B. and D.S.; Investigation, B.B., A.F., J.T.P., A.P., T.G., W.C. and D.S.; Methodology, B.B., J.T.P.; Supervision, B.B.; Writing—original draft, B.B., M.F., A.F., A.P., T.G., J.T.P. and D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is financed/co-financed under the Leading Reasarch Groups support project from the subsidy increased for the period 2020–2025 in the amount of 2% of the subsidy referred to Art. 387 (3) of the Law of 20 July 2018 on Higher Education and Science, obtained in 2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the country’s current laws (see the text for details, in the “Materials and Methods” paragraph).

Data Availability Statement

The original data are available by contact with the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their special gratitude to James Tattersall and Scott Richards for scientific English language correction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Purzyc, H.A. General characteristic of Hucul horses. Act. Sci. Pol. Med. Vet. 2000, 6, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mackowski, M.; Mucha, S.; Cholewiński, G.; Cieslak, J. Genetic diversity in Hucul and Polish primitive horse breeds. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2015, 58, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cywińska, A.; Czopowicz, M.; Witkowski, L.; Górecka, R.; Degórski, A.; Guzera, M.; Szczubełek, P.; Turło, A.; Schollenberger, A.; Winnicka, A. Reference intervals for selected hematological and biochemical variables in Hucul horses. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 18, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Fornal, A.; Radko, A.; Piestrzyńska-Kajtoch, A. Genetic polymorphism of Hucul horse population based on 17 microsatellite loci. Act. Bioch. Pol. 2013, 60, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  5. Rola, J.; Larska, M.; Rola, J.G.; Belák, S.; Autorino, G.L. Epizootiology and phylogeny of equine arteritis virus in hucul horses. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 148, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Socha, W.; Sztromwasser, P.; Dunowska, M.; Jaklińska, B.; Rola, J. Spread of equine arteritis virus among Hucul horses with different EqCXCL16 genotypes and analysis of viral quasispecies from semen of selected stallions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bażanów, B.A.; Jackulak, N.A.; Frącka, A.B.; Staroniewicz, Z.M. Abortogenic viruses in horses. Equine Vet. Educ. 2014, 26, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bażanów, B.A.; Frącka, A.B.; Jackulak, N.A.; Romuk, E.; Gębarowski, T.; Owczarek, A.; Stygar, D. Viral, Serological, and Antioxidant Investigations of Equine Rhinitis A Virus in Serum and Nasal Swabs of Commercially Used Horses in Poland. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Bażanów, B.A.; Jansen van Vuren, P.; Szymański, P.; Stygar, D.; Frącka, A.; Twardoń, J.; Kozdrowski, R.; Pawęska, J.T. A Survey on West Nile and Usutu Viruses in Horses and Birds in Poland. Viruses 2018, 10, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  10. Bolfa, P.; Barbuceanu, F.; Leau, S.E.; Leroux, C. Equine infectious anaemia in Europe: Time to re-examine the efficacy of monitoring and control protocols. Equine Vet. J. 2016, 48, 140–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  11. Gerber, H.; Steck, F.; Hofer, B.; Walther, L.; Friedli, U. Serological investigations on equine viral arteritis. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, Lyon, France, 24–27 September 1976; Bryans, J.T., Gerber, H., Eds.; Veterinary Publications: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1978; pp. 461–465. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilkerson, J.R.; Whalley, J.M.; Drummer, H.E.; Studdert, M.J.; Love, D.N. Epidemiology of EHV-1 and EHV-4 in the mare and foal populations on a Hunter Valley stud farm: Are mares the source of EHV-1 for unweaned foals. Vet. Microbiol. 1999, 68, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bażanów, B.A.; Jackulak, N.A.; Florek, M.; Staroniewicz, Z. Equid Herpesvirus-Associated Abortion in Poland between 1977–2010. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012, 32, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Black, W.; Wilcox, R.; Stevenson, R.; Hartley, C.; Ficorilli, N.; Gilkerson, J.; Studdert, M. Prevalence of serum neutralising antibody to equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV), equine rhinitis B virus 1 (ERBV1) and ERBV2. Vet. Microbiol. 2007, 119, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Burrows, R.; Denyer, M.; Goodridge, D.; Hamilton, F. Field and laboratory studies of equine influenza viruses isolated in 1979. Vet. Rec. 1981, 109, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kriegshäuser, G.; Deutz, A.; Kuechler, E.; Skern, T.; Lussy, H.; Nowotny, N. Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to Equine rhinitis A and B virus in horses and man. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 106, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nikolay, B. A review of West Nile and Usutu virus co-circulation in Europe: How much do transmission cycles overlap? Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 109, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Moniuszko-Malinowska, A.; Czupryna, P.; Dunaj, J.; Zajkowska, J.; Siemieniako, A.; Pancewicz, S. West Nile virus and USUTU--a threat to Poland. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2016, 70, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Issel, C.J.; Adams, W.V. Detection of equine infectious anemia virus in a horse with an equivocal agar gel immunodiffusion test reaction. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1982, 180, 276–278. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Halliday, J.E.B.; Meredith, A.L.; Knobel, D.L.; Shaw, D.J.; Bronsvoort, B.M.d.C.; Cleaveland, S. A framework for evaluating animals as sentinels for infectious disease surveillance. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4, 973–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Timoney, J.; Gillespie, J.H.; Scott, F.W.; Barlough, J.E. Laboratory diagnosis of viral infection. In Hagan and Bruner’s Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, 8th ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 467–468. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cullinane, A. Equine influenza (infection with equine influenza virus). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2019, 8th ed.; OIE World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2020; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Timoney, P.J. Equine viral arteritis (infection with equine arteritis virus). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2019, 8th ed.; OIE World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2020; pp. 1333–1349. [Google Scholar]
  24. Elton, D.; Bryant, N. Equine rhinopneumonitis (equine herpesvirus-1 and -4). In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2019, 8th ed.; OIE World Organisation for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2020; pp. 1320–1332. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carman, S.; Rosendal, S.; Huber, L.; Gyles, C.; McKee, S.; Willoughby, R.A.; Dubovi, E.; Thorsen, J.; Lein, D. Infectious agents in acute respiratory disease in horses in Ontario. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1997, 9, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Zhang, W.; Besselaar, T.G. The laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza. In Manual for the Laboratory Diagnosis and Virological Surveillance of Influenza; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ludolfs, D.; Niedrig, M.; Paweska, J.T.; Schmitz, H. Reverse ELISA for the detection of anti-West Nile virus antibodies in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oliveira, F.G.; Diniz, R.S.; Camargos, M.F.; de Oliveira, A.M.; de Souza Rajão, D.; Braz, G.F.; Leite, R.C.; Pimenta dos Reis, J.K. Comparative study of agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) protocols for the diagnosis of equine infectious anemia in Brazil. Sem. Cien. Agra. 2013, 34, 3909–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Mealey, R.H. Equine Infectious Anaemia. In Equine Infectious Diseases, 1st ed.; Sellon, D.C., Long, M.T., Eds.; Saunders Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 213–219. [Google Scholar]
  30. Golnik, W.; Bażanów, B.; Florek, M.; Pawęska, J. Prevalence of equine arteritis and West Nile virus–specific antibodies in thoroughbred horses in Poland. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska 2008, 21, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bażanów, B.A.; Frącka, A.B.; Jackulak, N.A.; Staroniewicz, Z.M.; Ploch, S.M. A 34-year retrospective study of equine viral abortion in Poland. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2014, 17, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Equine viral arteritis: Not just a reproductive disease. Vet. Rec. 2019, 184, 791–793. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cruz-Lopez, F.; Newton, R.; Sanchez-Rodriguez, A.; Ireland, J.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Moreno, M.A.; Fores, P. Equine viral arteritis in breeding and sport horses in central Spain. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lazić, S.; Lupulović, D.; Gaudaire, D.; Petrovic, T.; Lazić, G.; Hans, A. Serological evidence of equine arteritis virus infection and phylogenetic analysis of viral isolates in semen of stallions from Serbia. BMC Vet. Res. 2017, 13, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  35. Newton, J.R.; Wood, J.L.; Castillo-Olivares, F.J.; Mumford, J.A. Serological surveillance of equine viral arteritis in the United Kingdom since the outbreak in 1993. Vet. Rec. 1999, 145, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kölbl, S.; Schuller, W.; Pabst, J. Serologische Untersuchungen zur aktuellen Verseuchung österreichischer Pferde mit dem Virus der Equinen Arteritis [Serological studies of the recent infections of Austrian horses with the equine arteritis virus]. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 1991, 98, 43–45. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  37. Szeredi, L.; Hornyák, A.; Pálfi, V.; Molnár, T.; Glávits, R.; Dénes, B. Study on the epidemiology of equine arteritis virus infection with different diagnostic techniques by investigating 96 cases of equine abortion in Hungary. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 108, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grądzki, Z.; Boguta, L. Seroprevalence of EHV1 and EHV4 in the horse population of the southeastern part of Poland. Med. Wet. 2009, 65, 188–193. [Google Scholar]
  39. Patel, J.R.; Heldens, J. Equine herpesviruses 1 (EHV-1) and 4 (EHV-4)—Epidemiology, disease and immunoprophylaxis: A brief review. Vet. J. 2005, 170, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cruz, F.; Fores, P.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Ireland, J.; Moreno, M.A.; Newton, J.R. Seroprevalence and factors associated with equine herpesvirus type 1 and 4 in Spanish Purebred horses in Spain. Vet. Rec. 2016, 178, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Holmes, D.F.; Kemen, M.J.; Coggins, L. Equine rhinovirus infection—Serologic evidence of infection in selected horse population. In Equine Infectious Diseases, 4th ed.; Bryans, J.T., Gerber, H., Eds.; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 1978; pp. 315–319. [Google Scholar]
  42. De Boer, G.F.; Osterhaus, A.D.; van Oirschot, J.T.; Wemmenhove, R. Prevalence of antibodies to equine viruses in the Netherlands. Vet. Q. 1979, 1, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Daly, J.M.; Yates, P.J.; Newton, J.R.; Park, A.; Henley, W.; Wood, J.L.N.; Davis-Poynter, N.; Mumford, J.A. Evidence supporting the inclusion of strains from each of the two co-circulating lineages of H3N8 equine influenza virus in vaccines. Vaccine 2004, 22, 4101–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Webster, R.G. Are equine 1 influenza viruses still present in horses? Equine Vet. J. 1993, 25, 537–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paillot, R.; Pitel, P.H.; Pronost, S.; Legrand, L.; Fougerolle, S.; Jourdan, M.; Marcillaud-Pitel, C. Florida clade 1 equine influenza virus in France. Vet. Rec. 2019, 184, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nemoto, M.; Ohta, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Kambayashi, Y.; Bannai, H.; Tsujimura, K.; Yamayoshi, S.; Kawaoka, Y.; Cullinane, A. Antigenic differences between equine influenza virus vaccine strains and Florida sublineage clade 1 strains isolated in Europe in 2019. Vet. J. 2021, 272, 105674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sovinová, O.; Tumová, B.; Pouska, F.; Nemec, J. Isolation of a virus causing respiratory disease in horses. Acta Virol. 1958, 2, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
  48. Guo, Y.; Wang, M.; Kawaoka, Y.; Gorman, O.; Ito, T.; Saito, T.; Webster, R.G. Characterisation of a new avian-like influenza A virus from horses in China. Virology 1992, 188, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adeyefa, C.A.O.; James, M.L.; McCauley, J.W. Antigenic and genetic analysis of equine influenza viruses from tropical Africa in 1991. Epidemiol. Infect. 1996, 117, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  50. Guo, L.; Wang, D.; Zhou, H.; Wu, C.; Gao, X.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, L.; Paranhos-Baccalà, G.; Shu, Y.; Jin, Q.; et al. Cross-reactivity between avian influenza A (H7N9) virus and divergent H7 subtypic- and heterosubtypic influenza A viruses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Soilemetzidou, E.S.; de Bruin, E.; Eschke, K.; Azab, W.; Osterrieder, N.; Czirják, G.Á.; Buuveibaatar, B.; Kaczensky, P.; Koopmans, M.; Walzer, C.; et al. Bearing the brunt: Mongolian khulan (Equus hemionus hemionus) are exposed to multiple influenza A strains. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 242, 108605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Olusa, T.A.O.; Adegunwa, A.K.; Aderonmu, A.A.; Adeyefa, C.A.O. Serologic evidence of equine H7 influenza virus in polo horses in Nigeria. Sci. World J. 2010, 5, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Spokes, P.J.; Marich, A.J.; Musto, J.A.; Ward, K.A.; Craig, A.T.; McAnulty, J.M. Investigation of equine influenza transmission in NSW: Walk, wind or wing? N. S. W. Public Health Bull. 2009, 20, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  54. Cadar, D.; Becker, N.; de Mendonca Campos, R.; Börstler, J.; Jöst, H.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J. Usutu virus in bats, Germany, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1771–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Allering, L.; Jöst, H.; Emmerich, P.; Günther, S.; Lattwein, E.; Schmidt, M.; Seifried, E.; Sambri, V.; Hourfar, K.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J. Detection of Usutu virus infection in a healthy blood donor from south-west Germany, 2012. Eurosurveillance 2012, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Barbic, L.; Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Listes, E.; Stevanovic, V.; Gjenero-Margan, I.; Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Pem-Novosel, I.; Listes, I.; Mlinaric-Galinovic, G.; Di Gennaro, A.; et al. Demonstration of Usutu virus antibodies in horses, Croatia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 772–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Petrovic, T.; Savic, V.; Barbic, L.; Tabain, I.; Stevanovic, V.; Klobucar, A.; Mrzljak, A.; Ilic, M.; Bogdanic, M.; et al. Epidemiology of Usutu Virus: The European Scenario. Pathogens 2020, 9, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Juricová, Z.; Pinowski, J.; Literák, I.; Hahm, K.H.; Romanowski, J. Antibodies to alphavirus, flavivirus, and bunyavirus arboviruses in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and tree sparrows (P. montanus) in Poland. Avian. Dis. 1998, 42, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Savic, V.; Petrovic, T.; Toplak, I.; Barbic, L.; Petric, D.; Tabain, I.; Hrnjakovic-Cvjetkovic, I.; Bogdanic, M.; Klobucar, A.; et al. Emerging Trends in the Epidemiology of West Nile and Usutu Virus Infections in Southern Europe. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  60. OIE Equine Infectious Anaemia, Poland. Available online: https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=MapFullEventReport&reportid=17935 (accessed on 17 June 2015).
Table 1. Results of serological investigation of the Hucul herd.
Table 1. Results of serological investigation of the Hucul herd.
Virus TestedNumber of Positive
Results/Number of the Horses Tested
Percentage of
Seropositive Horses (%)
equine arteritis virus0/200
equine herpes virus 112/2060
equine rhinitis A virus 1/205
equine influenza A virus H7N713/2065
equine influenza A virus H3N812/2060
Usutu virus5/2025
West Nile virus0/200
equine infectious anaemia virus0/200
Table 2. The immune status in individual horses.
Table 2. The immune status in individual horses.
No.SexAge (Years)Obtained Titres of Antibodies
EAVEHV1ERAVH7N7H3N8USUVWNVEIAV
1mare1000040204000
2mare901600208000
3mare50002002000
4mare100328002000
5mare5000200000
6mare8000080000
7mare100002020000
8mare50804040000
9mare503204040000
10mare90320040000
11stallion50008040000
12stallion603202001000
13stallion60802020000
14stallion5032000000
15stallion50160200000
16stallion500000000
17stallion901602020000
18stallion10080020000
19stallion90160200000
20stallion50002020000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bażanów, B.; Pawęska, J.T.; Pogorzelska, A.; Florek, M.; Frącka, A.; Gębarowski, T.; Chwirot, W.; Stygar, D. Serological Evidence of Common Equine Viral Infections in a Semi-Isolated, Unvaccinated Population of Hucul Horses. Animals 2021, 11, 2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082261

AMA Style

Bażanów B, Pawęska JT, Pogorzelska A, Florek M, Frącka A, Gębarowski T, Chwirot W, Stygar D. Serological Evidence of Common Equine Viral Infections in a Semi-Isolated, Unvaccinated Population of Hucul Horses. Animals. 2021; 11(8):2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bażanów, Barbara, Janusz T. Pawęska, Aleksandra Pogorzelska, Magdalena Florek, Agnieszka Frącka, Tomasz Gębarowski, Wojciech Chwirot, and Dominika Stygar. 2021. "Serological Evidence of Common Equine Viral Infections in a Semi-Isolated, Unvaccinated Population of Hucul Horses" Animals 11, no. 8: 2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop