Next Article in Journal
Growth and Body Composition of Artificially-Reared Lambs Exposed to Three Different Rearing Regimens
Next Article in Special Issue
Serum Amyloid A as a Promising Biomarker in Domestic Animals’ Reproduction: Current Knowledge and Future Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
A Critical Overview on Prostaglandin Inhibitors and Their Influence on Pregnancy Results after Insemination and Embryo Transfer in Cows
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in the Secretion of Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines and Acute-Phase Proteins in the Uterus after Artificial Insemination in the Mare
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Progesterone Concentrations during Canine Pregnancy

1
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
2
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
3
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Small Animals, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
4
Laboklin GmbH & Co KG, 97688 Bad Kissingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(12), 3369; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123369
Submission received: 22 October 2021 / Revised: 21 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

For breeders and bitches alike, pregnancy is a challenging period. Insufficient serum progesterone concentrations have frequently been suggested to be responsible for pregnancy loss or early parturition, without any scientific evidence to support those claims. In this study, a large number of bitches was followed throughout pregnancy, and serum progesterone concentrations were determined to deduce which concentrations could be considered normal. Three blood samples were collected, one each during early, mid and late pregnancy. The results indicated that progesterone concentrations can be lower than previously described as adequate in the veterinary literature, with the bitch still exhibiting no signs of pregnancy distress and giving birth to healthy puppies at the expected time.

Abstract

Pregnancy and lactation are amongst the most challenging times of a bitch’s life. Most studies focusing on the endocrinological aspect of pregnancy consider only a small number of animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate progesterone (P4) concentrations in a large number of bitches during early, mid and late pregnancy. In total, 126 bitches of various breeds were recruited following a thorough clinical and gynecological examination during estrus. Blood samples were collected three times (T1–T3) during pregnancy or from non-pregnant dogs in diestrus, and P4 was measured via chemiluminescence. At T1 (11–19 days post-ovulation (dpo)), serum P4 concentrations were 30.23 ± 6.65 ng/mL and 28.45 ± 6.26 ng/mL, at T2 (23–32 dpo) they were 22.73 ± 6.27 ng/mL and 22.59 ± 5.77 ng/mL and at T3 (52–60 dpo) they were 6.68 ± 2.18 ng/mL and 3.17 ± 2.26 ng/mL, in pregnant (n = 98) and non-pregnant (n = 23) dogs respectively. The P4 concentrations differed significantly between pregnant and non-pregnant animals at the last examination (p ≤ 0.001). In the context of hypoluteoidism, the gathered data yielded interesting results. Overall, 28 out of 98 pregnant bitches showed a greater decline (>15 ng/mL) in P4 concentrations from early to mid-pregnancy, and 56 bitches showed P4 concentrations lower than deemed adequate (>20 ng/mL at T1 and T2, >5 ng/mL at T3) according to existing recommendations. Despite not being supplemented with P4, none of those animals suffered from abortion or preterm delivery. Considering that supplementation of P4 can entail considerable risks for the bitch and the puppies, more research on P4 concentration patterns, diagnosis of hypoluteoidism and treatment indications and options is indicated.

1. Introduction

Progesterone (P4) is a steroid hormone belonging to the group of progestogens. With its manifold effects on the body, most notably on the uterus, it is essential for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Contrary to some other animal species, in which the placenta is involved in hormone synthesis towards the end of pregnancy, P4 only originates from the corpora lutea in the bitch [1,2,3]. The serum concentration of P4 during pregnancy has been subject of various articles published in the past 50 years [4,5,6]. However, most of the studies performed so far only examined a limited number of bitches and focused on specific breeds (see Table 1).
A related field of research is hypoluteoidism (or hypoluteinism) in the bitch, i.e., a primary failure of sufficient P4 secretion by the corpora lutea during pregnancy, which usually causes embryonic resorption or abortion of the whole litter. A premature decline in P4 secretion, most notably a decline below 2 ng/mL for more than 24 h, results in increased uterine contractility and cervical dilation, leading to the inability of the uterus to maintain pregnancy [7,8]. However, these conclusions about hypoluteoidism are based on research involving the administration of luteolytic drugs and subsequent hormone measurements. The reason for a premature decline in P4 in seemingly healthy bitches remains unclear, even though the amount of research concerning this subject has increased in the past 15 years [6,9,10,11]. Previous findings suggest insufficient production of luteotropic agents, such as relaxin and/or prolactin, which would consequently lead to insufficient P4 secretion in late pregnancy [12]. Other studies suggest malfunctions within the ovaries as the primary cause [13]. Furthermore, an occurrence of P4 antibodies in up to 20% of pregnant bitches has been found and discussed as a possible factor in the pathogenesis of hypoluteoidism [14]. The reported cumulation of suspected cases or an increased risk for hypoluteoidism in certain breeds (i.e., primarily German Shepherd) indicates a genetic component [15,16]. There is, however, no further research published that examines this possibility. Most authors agree that the diagnosis of hypoluteoidism can be achieved by eliminating all other possible causes for pregnancy loss, especially infectious causes such as Brucella canis, other opportunistic vaginal bacteria that may cause uterine infection, Canine herpesvirus or systemic diseases [17,18]. Other non-infectious causes include trauma, inadequate nutrition or genetic abnormalities in the offspring [19].
It has been claimed that many practitioners may unnecessarily supplement P4 derivates due to significant individual variation in serum P4 concentrations [15] or because the diagnosis of true hypoluteoidism is difficult to establish. One aspect may also be that owners of pregnant bitches may be reluctant to regularly measure P4 concentrations until they decline, but rather are willing to supplement the bitches right away [17]. Despite the possibility of supplementing bitches affected by hypoluteoidism, more resorptions and generally smaller litter sizes in these cases have been described [20]. Further knowledge about the physiological range of P4 concentrations might be helpful in suspected cases of hypoluteoidism.
Recommendations for diagnostic approaches and treatment of suspected canine hypoluteoidism cases in practice vary in the scientific literature. According to some authors, blood samples should be drawn weekly, beginning five to seven days after last breeding [21]. Bitches should be supplemented if P4 decreases below 5.0 ng/mL before the last week of pregnancy [19,21]. Others initiated a supplementation when P4 concentrations below 10.0 ng/mL were measured at the 4th to 5th week of pregnancy and signs of impending abortion were observed [6]. A detailed guideline for P4 supplementation can be found in a publication by Becher et al. (2010) [15]. According to Becher and colleagues, P4 concentrations should be higher than 20.0 ng/mL between days 10 and 30, higher than 5.0 ng/mL between days 30 and 45 and higher than 1.5 ng/mL between days 45 and 58. Furthermore, the authors suggest that a sudden decline in P4 by 10 to 15 ng/mL between days 20 and 35 is indicative for hypoluteoidism and an indication for supplementation. The authors do not specify whether the days are counted from ovulation, LH surge or other. Other authors initiated supplementation of P4 if serum concentrations decreased by 20–30 ng/mL within 5 days [14].
The aim of this study was to assess the P4 concentrations in all stages of canine pregnancy using a large number of healthy dogs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

In total, 126 privately owned bitches of 65 different breeds were sampled in the course of this study. To be included, bitches had to be generally healthy within the past 6 months and receive no medication during that time. Previous gynecological illnesses were looked for but not present in any of the bitches. It was also expected of the bitches to be mated, with refusal resulting in exclusion from the study. Furthermore, cycle length and regularity, progress of previous pregnancies and litter sizes in those pregnancies, and possible hormone treatments were investigated. Informed written consent and approval from the owners was obtained (Animal testing approval number O 0095/18). Dogs were enrolled from March 2018 until December 2019.

2.2. Study Design

A first presentation of the bitches in the clinic took place to determine the day of ovulation. Provided they met the criteria to be included in the study, the initial examination before mating or insemination included an inspection of the vaginal cavity to assess the vaginal mucosa. During the inspection via speculum (Proctovision, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) a vaginal smear was taken, stained and evaluated for the percentage distribution of vaginal epithelial cells and the potential occurrence of neutrophils. Furthermore, a general clinical assessment was performed, recording current body weight, rectal temperature, respiratory and heart rate. Finally, a blood sample for a comprehensive hematological evaluation and the determination of serum P4 concentration was obtained. Most bitches were repeatedly presented at the clinic until ovulation, which was defined as occurring when P4 reached concentrations between 4 and 8 ng/mL.
For the purpose of this study, the three stages of canine pregnancy were defined as ranging from conception until day 21, from day 22 until day 42 and day 43 until parturition. As the protocol required one examination in each stage of pregnancy (see Figure 1), the bitches were next examined between day 11 and day 19 after ovulation (T1). This examination only included the general clinical assessment and the acquisition of a blood sample for serum P4 concentrations.
The next appointment took place between day 23 and day 32 (T2). The T2 examination included an ultrasonic examination to ascertain whether the bitch was pregnant. This examination was scheduled prior to the middle of the second third, to respect the owners’ wishes of having a pregnancy diagnosis sooner rather than later, while still completing the study examination within the same appointment. Again, the general clinical assessment was performed, and a blood sample was drawn. Bitches that had an inconclusive ultrasound result were reexamined a few days later. All bitches that had not become pregnant were assigned to the non-pregnant group (n = 25).
At the last examination between day 52 and 60 (T3), an ultrasound was also performed to check on the fetuses and the progress of the pregnancy, after the general clinical assessment and the extraction of blood.
The collection of all blood samples took place in the morning or early afternoon.
At parturition, the date of birth and thus the length of pregnancy from the time of ovulation and from first mating were recorded, as well as the type of delivery (natural or cesarean section). Furthermore, the number and weight of puppies (alive and stillborn) and survival after three weeks were documented, although the accuracy of this data is entirely dependent on the owner’s disclosure.

2.3. Blood Sampling and Sample Processing

Blood samples were collected by venipuncture from either the cephalic or the saphenous vein into plastic tubes (Sarstedt Tube 4.5 mL, Clotting Activator/Serum, 75 × 13 mm, Sarstedt AG & Co KG, Nümbrecht, Germany) and on the first examination also in an EDTA tube (EDTA KE/3ml, Sarstedt AG & Co KG, Nümbrecht, Germany). Samples were left at room temperature for 30 to 60 min for clotting and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm or 2884 g for 5 min (Hettich Centrifuge EBA 20, Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany). Serum was transferred into a serum tube (Simport Cryovial sterile with lip seal design, external threads, 2 mL Tubes, Boloeil, QC, Canada) which was either placed in the refrigerator at 5.0 °C for a maximum of 4 h and then delivered to the laboratory nearby on the campus (LABOKLIN GmbH & Co. KG Steubenstr. 4, 97688 Bad Kissingen, Germany), or it was delivered to the laboratory at once.
The P4 concentrations were determined via chemiluminescence (Immulite 2000 XPi, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Detection ranges were 0.20 ng/mL to 40.00 ng/mL. Concentrations larger than 40.00 ng/mL were set at 40.00 ng/mL and below 0.20 ng/mL at 0.20 ng/mL for statistical analyses. Validation for canine serum samples showed an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 3.72 to 4.77% and an inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.72 to 3.32%.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or mean and range (min–max). For all statistical analyses, Microsoft Excel (Windows 10; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 25; IBM Deutschland GmbH, Ehningen, Germany) were used. Differences in litter size and gestation length were compared between weight, age, parity and breed groups using a one-way ANOVA. Analyses of P4 concentrations were stratified by timepoint, to ensure that each bitch only occurred once in each analysis. P4 concentrations were compared between pregnancy status, weight and breed groups using a one-way ANOVA. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. General Information

Of the 126 dogs enrolled, three bitches were excluded in the course of the study, as one bitch was ovariohysterectomized due to pyometra, one bitch was hypothyroid and had to be supplemented, and the owner of one bitch no longer wished to take part in the study. Hence, 123 bitches were eligible for further analysis, of which 25 did not become pregnant. Thus 20% of bitches did not become pregnant, although they were mated. In all bitches that did not become pregnant, ultrasound results were unremarkable, showing no signs of resorption. In addition, the bitches showed no further symptoms, such as abnormal vaginal discharge.
Inquiry concerning the reproductive history and previous hormonal medication in the bitches did not reveal any significant information in 117 of the bitches. Of the remaining six bitches, two were treated with aglepristone more than one year before enrollment because of undesired mating, two were treated with cabergoline, one for estrus induction more than a year previously (albeit this bitch came into estrus spontaneously this time) and one to treat symptoms of pseudopregnancy; one had developed a mild pyometra after the previous heat, which was treated successfully with antibiotics, and the 6th was suspected to be suffering from mild subinvolution of placental sites after the previous birth, but recovered without medication. A total of seven bitches had previously undergone a cesarean section, with one elective and the remaining six due to dystocia.
The most common breeds in this study were French bulldogs (n = 8), miniature bull terriers (n = 7) and miniature smooth-haired dachshunds (n = 4), standard wire-haired dachshunds (n = 4), golden retrievers (n = 4) and English cocker spaniels (n = 4).
Body weights and age at the first examination ranged from 2.4 kg to 71.4 kg (mean 21.7 kg) and 15 months to 8 years (mean 4 years), respectively. All dogs were kept in their owners’ care during the study and were fed various commercial dog foods. Of the 123 bitches, 37 had had one previous litter, 22 had whelped two or more times, and 63 had had no previous litters. In one bitch, the parity was unknown. For detailed information, see Appendix A.
The average weight gain during pregnancy was 4.1 kg, with one bitch gaining as little as 600g and one bitch gaining 12.8 kg. The average relative weight increase was 21.6%, with one bitch gaining 3.6% and one bitch gaining 47.2% of their respective body weights.
Overall, 100 bitches were mated naturally. The remaining 23 bitches were artificially inseminated via a transcervical endoscopy using fresh semen (n = 16), frozen-thawed semen (n = 5) or chilled semen (n = 2). The reasons for the artificial inseminations were unwillingness of the bitch to be mated (n = 8), inexperienced males (n = 7), the use of semen from desirable males located too far away (n = 7) or concern of the owner regarding the males’ wellbeing (n = 1).

3.2. Delivery and Litter Size

In total, 83 bitches delivered naturally on days 57 to 66 after the first day of mating (mean 61) or on days 59 to 67 after ovulation (mean 63). Due to dystocia, 15 bitches delivered via C-section on days 58 to 64 after the first day of mating (mean 61) or days 61 to 68 after ovulation (mean 63). No elective C-sections were performed on any of the bitches in this study.
Gestation lasted 63 days after ovulation on average (59 to 68 days), with 23.4% of bitches whelping after exactly 63 days. Calculating the accuracy of prediction of the day of parturition using pre-breeding serum P4 concentrations yielded a 68.8% accuracy for day 63 ± 1, 92.2% for ±2, 94.8% for ±3 and 98.7% for ±4, while 100% accuracy was obtained for 63 ± 5 days.
The number of puppies born ranged from one puppy (n = 4) to 13 puppies (n = 5), with the mean number being six puppies. An overall number of 620 puppies were born, out of which 43 were stillborn and another 24 deceased in the first three weeks after birth.
The following parameters had an effect on litter size. Average litter size increased with the body weight of the bitch (see Table 2). The differences between the groups were significant (p ≤ 0.001). To be able to compare these results with those published in other articles, another evaluation was conducted using different weight categories: in bitches with a body weight of less than 10 kg (n = 24), gestation lasted 62.3 ± 1.2 days, in 10 to 25 kg bitches (n = 40) 63.1 ± 1.3 days, in 25 to 40 kg bitches (n = 26) 63.1 ± 1.6 days and in bitches heavier than 40 kg (n = 8) 63.0 ± 1.5 days.
Age had a significant effect on litter size (p = 0.03). With an average of eight puppies, the peak of litter size was reached by bitches of three to four years (see Table 2).
Bitches who had had no previous litters (n = 46) or one previous litter (n = 31) whelped seven puppies on average (one to 13 and three to 12, respectively). The average litter size in bitches who had had two (n = 14) previous litters was six (one to 12 puppies). Bitches with three or four previous litters (n = 6) whelped three puppies (two to eight).
To enhance comparability, the bitches were also sorted into breed groups according to the classification of the American Kennel Club (i.e., Herding, Hound, Non-Sporting, Sporting, Terrier, Toy, Working). Average litter size varied from three puppies in terrier breeds to eight puppies in sporting and working breeds.
Effects on gestation length were markedly different. No difference in the duration of gestation depending on body weight was evident, and neither age nor parity had a significant effect (see Table 2). Breed group did, however, influence gestation length. With 61.6 days, gestation length was shortest in toy breeds, and it was longest in terriers, with 63.7 days. Furthermore, litter size had a significant effect on gestation length (p = 0.03). With 62.4 days, it was shortest in large litters of nine to 13 pups, and significantly longer in litters of one to five pups, with 63.3 days.
Comparing the results of the T2 ultrasound to the actual litter size at birth showed that 72 of the 98 bitches were estimated correctly with a range of ± 1 puppy. More than half of these bitches (n = 36) were estimated with total accuracy.

3.3. Progesterone Analysis

A total of 366 samples were collected during pregnancy, as three non-pregnant bitches each missed one of the three appointments.
Mean serum P4 concentrations and distribution of concentrations are displayed in Figure 2. At the examinations during the first and second third, the mean serum P4 concentrations did not differ between the pregnant and the non-pregnant dogs. Only the last examination showed a significant (p ≤ 0.001) difference, with the pregnant bitches exhibiting higher P4 concentrations than the non-pregnant ones.
The P4 concentrations at T1 were 30.23 ± 6.65 ng/mL in the pregnant dogs and 28.45 ± 6.26 ng/mL in the non-pregnant ones. In the second third (T2) the concentrations were lower: 22.73 ± 6.27 ng/mL in the pregnant animals and 22.59 ± 5.77 ng/mL in the non-pregnant group. In the last third of pregnancy (T3) concentrations were 6.68 ± 2.18 ng/mL in the pregnant and 3.17 ± 2.26 ng/mL in the non-pregnant dogs. At the last examination, six non-pregnant bitches had P4 concentrations of <2 ng/mL. However, these bitches all had sufficiently high P4 concentrations at the previous two examinations, with only two bitches showing concentrations significantly below the mean for non-pregnant bitches. Those two bitches were one German shepherd dog and one Azawakh.
Taking a closer look at the P4 concentrations in relation to the sizes of the dogs, no differences were found between the subgroups at examinations T1, T2 and T3, respectively (see Table 3).
Grouping the bitches according to breed groups as described in 3.2. showed that terriers and non-sporting breeds in particular had a tendency for higher overall P4 concentrations during pregnancy or diestrus, while especially herding and hound breeds, but also sporting breeds, exhibited lower concentrations (see Table 4). This difference was significant at T2 and T3 (p = 0.002 and p ≤ 0.001).
Furthermore, the progression of P4 concentrations from the first to the second appointment was evaluated. Of the pregnant bitches, 28 showed a decline of more than 10 ng/mL from T1 to T2, with P4 concentrations decreasing by more than 15 ng/mL in 14 of the 28. All these bitches had a normal pregnancy and showed no signs of abortion or distress. For better visual separation, pregnant animals were further grouped according to the extent of the P4 decrease timepoints between T1 and T2. Individual developments of P4 concentrations can be examined in Figure 3.
Moreover, P4 concentrations before day 58, that is, at T3, were examined more closely. Of the 80 pregnant bitches that were examined before day 58 after ovulation, 18 had P4 concentrations lower than 5.00 ng/mL, but continued their pregnancy for four to 13 days before whelping.

4. Discussion

In this study, we assessed P4 concentrations during canine pregnancy using a large number of healthy dogs to supplement the existing knowledge. Several research groups have examined P4 concentrations in pregnant dogs, albeit with mostly small sample sizes and a limited number of breeds, so that the normal range of P4 concentrations still needs to be further assessed at different stages of the canine pregnancy.
A meta-analysis of 12 studies, published in 2012 [36], described data of a total number of 109 bitches, with beagles and Labrador retrievers accounting for roughly 80% of subjects, the remaining being German shepherd bitches (n = 11), cross-bred (n = 8) or unknown breeds (n = 4). As described in Section 1, a recent review of the existing literature by the authors of this study likewise revealed an overrepresentation of beagles and Labrador retrievers, and small total numbers of bitches studied. In that regard, it is warranted to conduct more studies with more dogs.
With the highest mean P4 concentrations of 29.87 ng/mL (30.23 ng/mL pregnant and 28.45 ng/mL non-pregnant) at T1 and lower mean P4 concentrations of 22.70 ng/mL (22.73 ng/mL pregnant and 22.59 ng/mL non-pregnant) at T2, the presented data are in accordance with some previously published results [32,33,37]. However, they contradict the findings of several other researchers, who stated that the highest overall P4 concentrations are reached between days 20 and 35 post ovulation [35,38,39]. Only 13 bitches (nine pregnant, four non-pregnant) reached the highest P4 concentrations at T2 with an increase of 0.70 to 4.50 ng/mL compared to T1, while the median decline in P4 in the other 110 bitches was 7.60 ng/mL (0.20 to 20.20 ng/mL). There was no noticeable similarity within this group of bitches when analyzing other factors assessed in this study. Considering the large individual variations of P4 concentrations demonstrated by many researchers [5,24,28], it is possible that the highest P4 concentrations would have been measured at a later date, if sampling had been performed daily or every few days.
The similarity of the pregnant and non-pregnant P4 concentrations at T1 and T2 agrees with most of the published literature, describing no relevant differences [4,13,32].
The significant difference in P4 concentrations between pregnant and non-pregnant bitches at T3 was a relevant finding. In six non-pregnant bitches, P4 concentrations had decreased below 2.00 ng/mL at T3 (days 52 to 60 after ovulation). Three bitches missed the third appointment. The other 16 non-pregnant bitches had a mean P4 concentration of 3.39 ± 2.03 ng/mL with individual concentrations as high as 8.60 ng/mL. Luz et al. [32] also measured lower mean P4 concentrations in non-pregnant compared to pregnant bitches in the last stage of pregnancy. Furthermore, they detected P4 concentrations below 1 ng/mL on average at day 66 in non-pregnant bitches, only three days later than in pregnant bitches. Concannon et al. [4] stated that a drop below 1 ng/mL in non-pregnant dogs occurred at days 51 to 82, which underlines the high variability of luteal regression. While new insights into the formation and function of canine corpora lutea have been studied, the mechanisms of luteal regression in the absence of pregnancy are still not fully understood [40].
The presented results show significant differences between breed groups in the second and last third of pregnancy. As highlighted in Section 3.3., the herding, hound and sporting breeds showed lower concentrations of P4 than the other breed groups throughout all appointments (see Table 4). Non-sporting and terrier breeds showed overall higher P4 concentrations than the other breed groups. As there is a paucity of breed-specific studies on P4 concentrations during pregnancy, no definite conclusions can be drawn on account of the presented results. Nonetheless, the knowledge of a tendency for lower P4 concentrations during pregnancy in certain breed groups may be helpful in cases of suspected hypoluteoidism, and should be investigated further.
Different proposals on how to manage suspected hypoluteoidism and when to start supplementing bitches have been published. Becher et al. (2010) [15] stated that P4 concentrations should be above 20 ng/mL between days 10 and 30 after ovulation. In this study, six pregnant bitches showed P4 concentrations lower than 20 ng/mL at T1. Of these bitches, five belonged to either the hound group or the sporting breed group. At T2 this number rose to 33 bitches, who all continued pregnancies without supplementation and whelped between one and thirteen puppies without an increased occurrence of complications. Of these bitches, 23 belonged to either the herding, hound or sporting breed group. Comparing the results of the T2 ultrasound to the litter size, only seven of the 33 bitches were estimated to give birth to more puppies.
The decline in P4 concentrations from the first to the second examination during pregnancy, which supposedly should not be larger than 10 to 15 ng/mL [15], was also evaluated. This suggestion is also not supported by the presented data. Of the pregnant bitches, 28 showed a decline of more than 10 ng/mL (average 15.15 ng/mL), continuing pregnancy without complications and overall whelping 163 puppies naturally, with 12 stillborn and nine puppy losses during the first three weeks after birth, and 27 puppies being born via cesarean section with five stillborn and one deceased. In this case, 18 of these bitches belonged to either the herding, hound or sporting group. Of the 28 bitches with a decline of more than 10 ng/mL, 14 showed a decline of more than 15 ng/mL. 12 of these bitches also had a normal pregnancy and whelped 83 puppies naturally with five stillborn and seven deceased. The remaining bitches had cesarean sections, with 14 healthy puppies and one stillborn. Of these bitches, nine belonged to either the herding, hound or sporting breed group. Again, comparing the T2 ultrasound results to the litter size at birth, only six of the 28 bitches were estimated to have a larger litter. The 70 bitches that showed a P4 decline of less than 10 ng/mL, or a rise in P4, whelped 430 puppies with 26 stillborn and 14 deceased. There were no clinically relevant differences in mean litter size or number of stillborn and deceased puppies between the bitches with “normal” P4 concentrations and those with concentrations lower than defined as normal. All non-pregnant bitches exhibited P4 concentrations sufficiently high to maintain a pregnancy at T1 and T2, and only six had P4 concentrations <2 ng/mL at T3. As the length of diestrus can vary in one bitch, depending on whether she is pregnant or not, it was assumed that these bitches were not suffering from hypoluteoidism but did not become pregnant for other reasons. The finding that 20% of bitches did not become pregnant is in accordance with average pregnancy rates after a combination of natural mating and insemination [41,42]. This proportion therefore did not raise suspicion that a high number of the included non-pregnant bitches reabsorbed due to pathological conditions. As no abnormal findings were observed in these bitches at the clinical and ultrasound examinations, and other parameters, such as the semen quality of the stud dogs, were widely unknown, no further diagnostic procedures were initiated in these cases.
Other authors [21] suggest that P4 concentrations should be higher than 5.00 ng/mL until day 58 of gestation. In this study, 18 of the 80 pregnant bitches examined before day 58 after ovulation had P4 concentrations lower than 5.00 ng/mL with an average of 4.19 ng/mL (2.39 to 4.95 ng/mL). Two bitches gave birth four days later (P4 concentrations 4.83 and 3.77 ng/mL respectively), the others were five to 13 days before parturition (mean eight days). Of these bitches, 14 belonged to either the herding, hound or sporting breed group, and only four had been estimated to give birth to more puppies.
Considering that supplementation of P4 can entail considerable risks for the bitch and the puppies, such as dystocia, pyometra and resultant septicemia, masculinization of female fetuses, fetal abnormalities, or fetal death [1,9], it is unsurprising that most authors caution against its use without a firm diagnosis. As the presented findings show that allegedly low P4 concentrations do not necessarily demonstrate an inability to maintain a pregnancy, it seems advisable to monitor the individual P4 progression more regularly and to consider possible breed-specific differences. Root-Kustritz (2001) [21] and Becher et al. (2010) [15] also propose a weekly blood sample, unless P4 concentrations drop below 10 ng/mL, at which point sampling should be performed two to four times a week.
Most studies where side effects have been observed after the administration of progestins were designed to examine long-time toxicity [43]. In their review from 2003, Romagnoli et al. [43] state that the occurrence of side effects is thought to be less likely in healthy adult bitches undergoing short-term treatment, but this conclusion is drawn mainly on empirical grounds. In three studies in which bitches expected to be suffering from luteal insufficiency were supplemented, an increased rate of c-sections and stillborn puppies were documented, although only one puppy showed congenital malformations [6,9,10]. Whether these findings were due to the supplementation remains open.
In a publication by Günzel-Apel at al. [13], the authors conclude that German shepherd dogs (n = 41) showed significantly lower P4 concentrations during diestrus and possibly during pregnancy than dogs of other breeds. This hypothesis can be supported by the data in this study, although we enrolled only three German shepherd bitches, out of which two became pregnant. At T1, the P4 concentrations were 20.40 ± 1.74 ng/mL for German shepherd bitches, and 29.60 ± 6.64 ng/mL for other bitches. At T2 and T3, similarly lower concentrations were detected with 14.40 ± 2.91 ng/mL vs. 22.20 ng/mL ± 6.17 ng/mL and 4.04 ± 2.42 ng/mL vs. 6.04 ng/mL ± 2.57 ng/mL. However, the number of German shepherds in the presented study was low and did not allow specific conclusions. Nevertheless, these data might be included in future reviews or meta-analyses.
The upper detection limit for measuring P4 concentrations was 40.0 ng/mL. Higher concentrations in 12 bitches (10 pregnant, two non-pregnant) at T1 and in two pregnant bitches at T2 could not be determined precisely. However, it is unlikely that a more accurate determination would have yielded biologically significant different findings.
In this study, the length of gestation ranged from 59 to 68 days (mean 63) and the accuracy of prediction of the day of parturition was 68.8% for 63 ± 1, 92.2% for ±2, 94.8% for ±3 and 98.7% for ±4 days, while 100% accuracy was reached for 63 ± 5 days. These results are comparable to other previously published findings [44,45].
Taking a closer look at the effect of litter size on gestation length, the interval from estimated ovulation to parturition averaged 63.3 ± 1.6 days for litters of one to five pups (n = 39), 62.7 ± 1.2 days for litters of six to eight pups (n = 40) and 62.4 ± 1.3 days for litters of nine to 13 pups (n = 19). The differences between the groups were significant (p = 0.03). These results are in accordance with those published by Tsutsui et al. (2006) [44]. Other authors chose to emphasize the difference between small and large litters by isolating singleton litters and litters of two puppies [46]. Applying this strategy to the presented results revealed more pronounced differences: for those litters with one or two pups (n = 6), the average length of gestation was 64.6 ± 1.4 days, while litters of three to nine pups (n = 62) and ten or more pups (n = 9) lasted 62.8 ± 1.3 and 62.4 ± 1.4 days, respectively. These findings are in accordance with those of Mir et al. (2011) [46]. Moreover, the authors state that bitches weighing less than 10 kg had a shorter mean gestation length than heavier bitches. This hypothesis was not confirmed by the results in this study: in bitches with a body weight of less than 10 kg (n = 24), gestation lasted 62.3 ± 1.2 days, while in bitches weighing 10 to 25 kg (n = 40), 25 to 40 kg (n = 26) or more than 40 kg (n = 8), gestation duration was 63.1 ± 1.3, 63.1 ± 1.6 and 63.0 ± 1.5 days, respectively. As in previously published work, age had no effect on the duration of gestation [47].
Additionally, as described in the study of Gavrilovic et al. (2008) [48], differences in litter size depending on the parity of the bitch were revealed. Bitches who had had no previous litters, one litter or two litters whelped six puppies on average, while bitches with three or four previous litters whelped three puppies. ANOVA showed a significant difference (p = 0.05) between bitches with less than or equal to two litters (n = 91) compared to bitches with three or four litters (n = 6). However, the large disparity between the two group sizes hardly allows for a conclusive inference. The age distribution showed a positive effect of advanced age on litter size until four years, then the average number of puppies declined. While bitches younger than two years whelped five puppies on average, and bitches of two to three years whelped six, bitches of three to four years had the largest mean litters with eight puppies. In older bitches, the number of puppies receded to a mean of six. The differences between the age groups were significant (p = 0.03). This finding coincides with previous publications [48,49]. An increase of average litter size with rising body weight in the bitch, as observed in this study (p ≤ 0.001), has also been described by other researchers [49].
The average relative weight gain of pregnant bitches of 22% was considerably lower than other published results [50]. This is probably due to the large number of different breeds studied and more variable litter sizes, although the breeds and number of animals or the litter sizes were not further specified in the cited publication.
Grouping the bitches by breed showed a statistically significant effect on litter size and gestation length. Notable is the fact that working breeds with the largest median litter size of eight had the second longest gestation length, with a mean of 63.4 days. Furthermore, the bitches of the toy breed group had the shortest mean gestation length of 61.6 days. These results are in contrast to those of Okkens et al. (2001) [51], where the smallest breed, West Highland white terriers, had the longest gestation duration of 62.8 days after mating. This difference may be due to the fact that there were only five pregnant bitches of toy breeds in this study, and they had comparably large litters of five puppies on average (three to six). As described in Section 3.2, bitches weighing less than or equal to 7.0 kg had the smallest mean litter size, but most of these bitches belonged to the hound breed group. Okkens et al. examined gestation length in different breeds in two studies [51,52] in 1993 and 2001. Terrier breeds (West Highland white terrier) had the longest gestation length of 62.8 days, followed by working breeds (Dobermann, boxer and Bernese mountain dog) with 61.8 days, herding breeds (German shepherd, old English sheepdog and Bouvier des Flandres) with 61.2 days and sporting breeds (Labrador retriever, golden retriever) with 60.9 days [51,52]. No hound, non-sporting or toy breeds were studied. However, Okkens et al. (1993 and 2001) calculated gestation length from the time of mating instead of from the estimated time of ovulation, so the data cannot be compared directly. As the time of mating was also based on the time of ovulation, which was determined after measuring P4 concentrations, two days can be added to the calculated gestation lengths to establish comparability. When employing this strategy, the previous data are in accordance with the results of this study, where terrier breeds gave birth after 63.7 days, working breeds after 63.4 days, herding breeds after 63.1 days and sporting breeds after 62.4 days. While the differences between the groups may not seem significant, further breed-specific knowledge will be useful when examining bitches close to parturition.
A limitation of the presented study was the use of privately owned bitches. Ideally, a comparative study would include strictly defined conditions of the study subjects with standardized surrounding factors, e.g., standardized feeding and housing, sampling on the same days of the cycle and standardized mating management. Our approach, nevertheless, enabled us to include a large number of bitches of various breeds, which better represent the dogs seen in everyday practice. The effect of feeding regimen on P4 has not yet been studied in the dog. Research on other species indicate potential effects, as high food intake induces higher P4 concentrations in pigs [53]. In ovariectomized rats, studies have shown that the simultaneous administration of estradiol and P4 resulted in decreased food intake [54,55]. The effect of food intake on P4 concentrations was not subject of this study, but reviewing the gathered data and available literature, it is indicated that feeding only has a minor effect. Since all samplings took place in the morning and early afternoon as indicated in Section 2.2, it is also unlikely that potential circadian secretion patterns, as have been described by some authors, have significantly influenced the presented results [5,56].
Furthermore, a study protocol with more frequent sampling could have yielded more specific results, but this would have significantly reduced the number of breeders willing to support the study, and thus reduced the power of the statistical analyses. Therefore, time frames during pregnancy were chosen that were feasible for the owners. The first examination (T1) was scheduled to assess P4 concentrations around the time of implantation, before the corpus luteum supposedly reaches its full potential [39]. The second examination (T2) enabled the evaluation of the progression of P4 concentrations during the prime of the corpus luteum, as many authors agree that the highest P4 concentrations are detected between days 20 and 35 post-ovulation [3,35]. Additionally, a drop in P4 concentrations due to luteal insufficiency may take place at days 25 to 35 of pregnancy in many cases of hypoluteoidism [17]. The third examination (T3) took place shortly before birth was expected, thus yielding P4 values during the late luteal phase [57].

5. Conclusions

Overall, the data presented in this study confirms the accepted progress of P4 concentrations during pregnancy. It is the first study on P4 concentrations during pregnancy with a large number of bitches and breeds studied. In the context of recent definitions of hypoluteoidism and interpretation of P4 concentrations at specific time points in the canine pregnancy, the gathered data do not support the previously published diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In total, 28 pregnant bitches showed a larger decline in P4 concentrations between T1 and T2, and 56 bitches showed P4 concentrations lower than the concentration recommended according to previous research findings. However, none of the animals in our study suffered from abortion or preterm delivery. Considering that supplementation of P4 can entail considerable risks for the bitch and the puppies, more research on P4 concentration patterns, diagnosis of hypoluteoidism and treatment indications and options is needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H., B.K., C.W., E.M. and S.P.A.; methodology, J.H., B.K., C.W., E.M. and S.P.A.; validation, B.K., C.W., E.M. and S.P.A.; formal analysis, J.H., A.B. and S.P.A.; investigation, J.H., J.L., L.R., P.H. and S.P.A.; resources, J.H., C.W., E.M. and S.P.A.; data curation, J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H. and S.P.A.; writing—review and editing, J.H., L.R., P.H., B.K., C.W., E.M. and S.P.A.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, S.P.A.; project administration, J.H., J.L. and S.P.A.; funding acquisition, S.P.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the German Government Agency for Health and Social Issues, Department for Veterinary Medicine and Foodstuffs (Approval number O 0095/18, approved on 26 March 2018).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this paper and its Appendix A.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participating breeders for their cooperation and interest in the study. Furthermore, we would like to thank the Berlin team of LABOklin GmbH & Co. KG for analyzing the samples. The publication of this article was funded by Freie Universität Berlin.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Müller, Elisabeth is the CEO, author Weber, Corinna was employed by the company Laboklin. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Supplementary information on the bitches enrolled in a study on progesterone concentrations in pregnancy or during diestrus.
Table A1. Supplementary information on the bitches enrolled in a study on progesterone concentrations in pregnancy or during diestrus.
NrBreedBreed GroupAge (y)Weight (kg)Previous LittersPrevious Litter SizesPregnant/Non-
Pregnant
C-
Section
Litter Size (incl. Stillborn)Stillborn orDeceased
001Miniature SchnauzerTerrier2.56.3 NP
002Gordon SetterSporting3.825.0 P 927
003BeagleHound6.814.627/7P 734
004English Cocker SpanielSporting5.913.248/5/2/5P 330
005English Springer SpanielSporting2.920.416NP
006Dogues des BordeauxWorking7.051.3411/12/12/13P 211
007RottweilerWorking3.143.6 PCS7034
008Petit BrabançonToy3.63.611P 523 1
009Standard Wire-Haired DachshundHound2.27.8 P 532
010Standard Wire-Haired DachshundHound5.05.625/5P 422
011DobermannWorking4.238.813NP
012Miniature Smooth Haired DachshundHound4.35.825/4P 615
013BeagleHound2.611.4 P 532
014Rhodesian RidgebackHound4.938.028/10P 12831
015ChihuahuaToy2.32.412P 312
016BoxerWorking2.928.8 PCS3201
017Irish TerrierTerrier5.712.8116P 7214
018Smooth CollieHerding1.319.6 P 532 1
019Rhodesian RidgebackHound4.932.2 P 13661
020Picardy ShepherdHerding2.223.5 NP
021Saarloos WolfdogHound6.228.825/6P 523
022Standard Smooth Haired DachshundHound3.77.215P 624
023Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier5.817.017NP
024Miniature Australian ShepherdHerding3.312.2 NP
025CollieHerding6.324.027/1P 523
026Cavalier King Charles SpanielToy3.77.013P 422
027Dutch SheepdogHerding5.014.417P 642
028BorzoiHound8.136.4 PCS844
029Miniature Wire-Haired DachshundHound1.64.2 P 431
030Miniature PoodleNon-Sporting1.97.6 P 422
031HovawartWorking3.435.8110P 1248
032Miniature Wire-Haired DachshundHound6.95.546/6/6/6P 651
033Jack Russell TerrierTerrier1.65.6 P 431
034Afghan HoundHound4.124.4 NP
035Labrador RetrieverSporting2.622.4 P 972
036VizslaSporting3.624.019NP
037HovawartWorking1.932.4 P 945
038German ShepherdHerding7.232.445/7/7/6P 8341
039Staffordshire Bull TerrierTerrier1.814.2 P 1 1
040French BulldogNon-Sporting2.713.8 P 6231
041Pyrenean ShepherdHerding5.513.025/1P 1 1
042Standard Smooth Haired DachshundHound3.310.214P 624
043French BulldogNon-Sporting1.912.4unclear P 725
044KromfohrlanderNon-Sporting5.210.418P 734
045French BulldogNon-Sporting1.410.8 P 10811
046French BulldogNon-Sporting2.611.813P 3021
047Newfoundland DogWorking3.545.0 NP
048Standard SchnauzerWorking7.818.215P 633
049Miniature Wire-Haired DachshundHound6.15.535/5/6P 321
050Old English BulldogNon-Sporting3.028.4111P 9531
051Parson Russell TerrierTerrier7.27.034/3/3P 211
052German ShepherdHerding7.933.646/9/8/6NP
053Old English BulldogNon-Sporting2.032.2 P 12651
054Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier4.719.018PCS761
055CollieHerding6.129.618NP
056Giant SchnauzerWorking2.437.6 P 64111
057TervurenHerding5.819.615P 642
058Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier4.816.417P 6132
059Scottish TerrierTerrier5.58.811PCS303
060WeimaranerSporting3.430.8 P 835
061Cairn TerrierTerrier1.98.0 P 211
062Australian ShepherdHerding6.426.8 NP
063AffenpinscherToy6.17.822/7PCS6141
064Standard Wire-Haired DachshundHound4.99.027/6P 734
065CollieHerding1.622.0 P 211
066VizslaSporting4.026.418P 1055 1
067BoxerWorking6.827.816P 413 2
068PugToy2.97.6 NP
069DobermannWorking4.938.613P 94233
070Jack Russell TerrierTerrier4.15.514P 321 1
071KromfohrlanderNon-Sporting2.39.2 P 972
072HovawartWorking6.741.6210/12P 8341
073MalinoisHerding4.121.6 P 404
074Nova Scotia Duck Tolling RetrieverSporting3.821.019PCS8431
075Old German Shepherd DogHerding1.833.2 P 1055 1
076Irish WolfhoundHound2.956.4 P 13841
077Black Russian TerrierTerrier3.446.4113P 12921
078Newfoundland DogWorking4.046.0 NP
079Golden RetrieverSporting4.422.8 P 523
080Golden RetrieverSporting3.833.6113P 853
081Entlebucher Mountain DogHerding2.623.6 P 734
082Cairn TerrierTerrier1.98.2 P 734
083BoerboelWorking4.071.4 NP
084PugToy2.18.8 P 523
085Cairn TerrierTerrier2.78.0 P 514
086BeagleHound3.511.015NP
087Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier1.814.6 P 321
088French BulldogNon-Sporting3.113.618PCS734
089Greater Swiss Mountain DogWorking2.048.0 PCS133734
090English SetterSporting2.425.0 P 743 1
091Polish Lowland SheepdogHerding3.815.023/2P 303
092Miniature PoodleNon-Sporting1.87.8 P 532
093German ShepherdHerding6.927.0 PCS1 1
094Dogues des BordeauxWorking3.349.0 P 1376
095Golden RetrieverSporting4.633.0 P 624
096Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier5.416.026/5PCS62311
097EurasianNon-Sporting3.820.815P 532
098AzawakhHound7.219.018NP
099Standard Wire-Haired DachshundHound3.49.2 P 624
100Nova Scotia Duck Tolling RetrieverSporting5.815.814P 532
101KromfohrlanderNon-Sporting2.910.4 P 7331
102English Cocker SpanielSporting2.911.218P 862
103Golden RetrieverSporting2.632.8 P 844
104Labrador RetrieverSporting5.328.217P 624
105English Cocker SpanielSporting2.911.218PCS642
106Dutch ShepherdHerding3.438.8 P 1358
107Spinone ItalianoSporting6.332.0 NP
108English Cocker SpanielSporting8.212.624/3NP
109Smooth CollieHerding2.221.6 NP
110Black Russian TerrierTerrier7.154.025/5PCS31111
111Entlebucher Mountain DogHerding5.023.222/3P 422
112Dogues des BordeauxWorking8.053.2 NP
113AzawakhHound7.219.4 NP
114Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier2.312.0 NP
115English SetterSporting3.026.4 NP
116Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier1.314.6 P 312 1
117AzawakhHound7.918.818P 725
118Saarloos WolfdogHound4.530.4 P 624 3
119French BulldogNon-Sporting1.412.6 P 835
120French BulldogNon-Sporting2.112.2 P 63212
121Greater Swiss Mountain DogWorking3.739.018PCS10253
122French BulldogNon-Sporting1.810.4 NP
123Miniature Bull TerrierTerrier2.916.8 PCS6123
Table A2. P4 concentrations in ng/mL of all bitches at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32; T3 = d52–d60).
Table A2. P4 concentrations in ng/mL of all bitches at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32; T3 = d52–d60).
NumberPregnant/
Non-Pregnant
T1 P4T2 P4T3 P4
001NP23.0024.004.44
002P35.3030.909.99
003P35.5023.604.95
004P28.220.44.17
005NP25.0017.203.37
006P13.1016.64.49
007P29.0026.108.40
008P40.0032.206.58
009P36.9021.407.30
010P38.623.707.35
011NP25.119.503.40
012P19.9021.004.15
013P24.8016.403.58
014P12.811.403.93
015P32.5028.209.64
016P21.1013.24.78
017P36.1022.506.48
018P31.9021.104.15
019P32.1017.805.78
020NP26.2023.801.61
021P21.0013.303.72
022P31.316.76.66
023NP31.4028.906.02
024NP22.6022.1/
025P25.1015.304.50
026P33.517.66.72
027P21.2012.405.32
028P22.318.604.62
029P20.7015.705.61
030P27.2017.504.89
031P34.2026.305.69
032P27.8021.506.06
033P31.8025.907.22
034NP35.5030.004.87
035P19.5014.406.43
036NP29.6030.702.49
037P35.1031.004.91
038P20.4015.304.83
039P29.3028.9010.6
040P32.9029.4010.8
041P28.2026.009.2
042P32.5022.606.6
043P29.6026.7010.60
044P34.7014.505.24
045P35.637.106.51
046P26.7021.509.94
047NP27.0028.403.56
048P40.0020.48.48
049P40.0025.100.90
050P39.024.209.75
051P27.816.605.58
052NP18.19.880.30
053P33.2027.306.92
054P36.9032.207.81
055NP29.1021.803.54
056P40.0027.008.10
057P29.0022.805.14
058P27.7021.407.49
059P33.2029.006.91
060P19.1020.704.15
061P30.6021.708.11
062NP39.0022.202.67
063P25.8021.207.02
064P40.0037.706.30
065P31.8022.908.22
066P40.0031.307.21
067P27.1022.507.37
068NP32.5024.90/
069P35.7020.305.62
070P32.4023.107.51
071P40.0033.107.16
072P40.0040.0011.80
073P25.9023.804.93
074P35.9019.305.36
075P34.4017.403.49
076P24.4024.107.77
077P38.0020.905.06
078NP24.2018.202.93
079P21.0015.307.57
080P32.2022.608.10
081P25.0017.504.05
082P35.8034.907.00
083NP38.6020.200.2
084P29.0018.505.27
085P37.5040.009.85
086NP31.3025.601.05
087P28.1029.210.10
088P34.3025.707.11
089P21.5015.903.77
090P21.3022.0010.30
091P37.620.106.33
092P20.8016.305.91
093P21.5014.404.04
094P36.5032.608.33
095P33.9017.806.47
096P28.6025.407.76
097P29.2027.409.89
098NP24.4014.500.40
099P19.8019.605.81
100P29.9031.0010.70
101P40.0020.805.52
102P40.0024.202.83
103P25.4026.208.56
104P24.9020.804.74
105P32.414.402.39
106P29.6015.14.87
107NP28.6016.901.42
108NP20.9013.102.45
109NP23.9022.902.35
110P39.4025.008.72
111P24.9015.204.59
112NP18.6023.10/
113NP29.5017.803.02
114NP40.0033.808.57
115NP27.2025.802.11
116P23.4022.207.23
117P23.1019.709.85
118P36.918.707.96
119P29.0024.3010.10
120P33.4031.509.41
121P34.7023.405.60
122NP40.0029.508.90
123P25.6018.807.63

References

  1. Tsutsui, T. Effects of ovariectomy and progesterone treatment on the maintenance of pregnancy in bitches. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 1983, 45, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Okkens, A.C.; Dieleman, S.J.; Bevers, M.M.; Willemse, A.H. Evidence for the non-involvement of the uterus in the lifespan of the corpus luteum in the cyclic dog. Vet. Q. 1985, 7, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Verstegen-Onclin, K.; Verstegen, J. Endocrinology of pregnancy in the dog: A review. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Concannon, P.W.; Hansel, W.; Visek, W.J. The ovarian cycle of the bitch: Plasma estrogen, LH and progesterone. Biol. Reprod. 1975, 13, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Steinetz, B.G.; Goldsmith, L.T.; Hasan, S.H.; Lust, G. Diurnal variation of serum progesterone, but not relaxin, prolactin, or estradiol-17β in the pregnant bitch. Endocrinology 1990, 127, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tibold, A.; Thuróczy, J. Progesterone, oestradiol, FSH and LH concentrations in serum of progesterone-treated pregnant bitches with suspected luteal insufficiency. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44 (Suppl. S2), 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Concannon, P.W.; Hansel, W. Prostaglandin F2α induced luteolysis, hypothermia, and abortions in beagle bitches. Prostaglandins 1977, 13, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kowalewski, M.P. Endocrine and molecular control of luteal and placental function in dogs: A review. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47 (Suppl. S6), 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Görlinger, S.; Galac, S.; Kooistra, H.S.; Okkens, A.C. Hypoluteoidism in a bitch. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Günzel-Apel, A.R.; Urhausen, C.; Wolf, K.; Einspanier, A.; Oei, C.; Piechotta, M. Serum progesterone in pregnant bitches supplemented with progestin because of expected or suspected luteal insufficiency. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47 (Suppl. S6), 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Johnson, C.A. High-risk pregnancy and hypoluteoidism in the bitch. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Johnson, C.A. Pregnancy management in the bitch. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 1412–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Günzel-Apel, A.R.; Zabel, S.; Bunck, C.F.; Dieleman, S.J.; Einspanier, A.; Hoppen, H.-O. Concentrations of progesterone, prolactin and relaxin in the luteal phase and pregnancy in normal and short-cycling German Shepherd dogs. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 1431–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krachudel, J.; Bondzio, A.; Einspanier, R.; Einspanier, A.; Gottschalk, J.; Kuechenmeister, U.; Muennich, A. Luteal insufficiency in bitches as a consequence of an autoimmune response against progesterone? Theriogenology 2013, 79, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Becher, A.; Wehrend, A.; Goericke-Pesch, S. Luteal insufficiency in the bitch—Symptoms, diagnosis, consequences and therapy. A review of the literature. Tierarztl. Praxis Ausg. K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2010, 38, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rosset, E.; Mazereaux, C.; Buff, S. Retrospective study of hypoluteoidism cases in the bitch. In Proceedings of the 2010 EVSSAR Congress, Luvain La Neuve, Belgium, 14–15 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Verstegen, J.; Dhaliwal, G.; Verstegen-Onclin, K. Canine and feline pregnancy loss due to viral and non-infectious causes: A review. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Graham, E.M.; Taylor, D.J. Bacterial reproductive pathogens of cats and dogs. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2012, 42, 561–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Root Kustritz, M.V. Pregnancy diagnosis and abnormalities of pregnancy in the dog. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Günzel-Apel, A.R.; Zabel, S.; Einspanier, A.; Hoppen, H.O. „Significance, diagnostics and handling of luteal insufficiency in the dog: Breeders‘ wishes and the veterinarians‘ responsibility. In ” In Proceedings of the 49th yearly conference of the section small animal diseases of the German Veterinary Society DVG, Leipzig, Germany, 6–9 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  21. Root Kustritz, M.V. Use of supplemental progesterone in management of canine pregnancy. Recent Advances in Small Animal Reproduction; Concannon, P.W., England, G., Verstegen, J., III, Linde Forsberg, C., Eds.; International Veterinary Information Service: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parkes, M.F.; Bell, E.T.; Christie, D.W. Plasma progesterone levels during pregnancy in the beagle bitch. Br. Vet. J. 1972, 128, xv. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, G.E.; Boyns, A.R.; Cameron, E.H.D.; Bell, E.T.; Christie, D.W.; Parkes, M.F. Plasma oestradiol, luteinizing hormone and progesterone during pregnancy in the Beagle bitch. Reproduction 1973, 35, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Smith, M.S.; McDonald, L.E. Serum levels of luteinizing hormone and progesterone during the estrous cycle, pseudopregnancy and pregnancy in the dog. Endocrinology 1974, 94, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hadley, J.C. Total unconjugated oestrogen and progesterone concentrations in peripheral blood during pregnancy in the dog. Reproduction 1975, 44, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Edqvist, L.-E.; Johansson, E.D.B.; Kasström, H.; Olsson, S.-E.; Richkind, M. Blood plasma levels of progesterone and oestradiol in the dog during the oestrous cycle and pregnancy. J. Endocrinol. 1975, 78, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Austad, R.; Lunde, A.; Sjaastad, O.V. Peripheral plasma levels of oestradiol-17 β and progesterone in the bitch during the oestrous cycle, in normal pregnancy and after dexamethasone treatment. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1976, 46, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gräf, K.-J. Serum oestrogen, progesterone and prolactin concentrations in cyclic, pregnant and lactating beagle dogs. Reproduction 1978, 52, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Chakraborty, P.K. Reproductive hormone concentrations during estrus, pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in the Labrador bitch. Theriogenology 1987, 27, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Steinetz, B.G.; Goldsmith, L.T.; Lust, G. Plasma relaxin levels in pregnant and lactating dogs. Biol. Reprod. 1987, 37, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Steinetz, B.G.; Goldsmith, L.T.; Harvey, H.J.; Lust, G. Serum relaxin and progesterone concentrations in pregnant, pseudopregnant, and ovariectomized, progestin-treated pregnant bitches: Detection of relaxin as a marker of pregnancy. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1989, 50, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  32. Luz, M.R.; Bertan, C.M.; Binelli, M.; Lopes, M.D. Plasma concentrations of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto prostaglandin F2-alpha (PGFM), progesterone and estradiol in pregnant and nonpregnant diestrus cross-bred bitches. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 1436–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Günzel-Apel, A.R.; Beste, N.; Nottorf, S.; Eschricht, F.; Hoppen, H.O.; Dieleman, S.; Einspanier, A. Comparison of selected endocrine parameters during luteal phase and pregnancy in German Shepherd dogs and Beagles. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44 (Suppl. S2), 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thuróczy, J.; Müller, L.; Kollár, E.; Balogh, L. Thyroxin and progesterone concentrations in pregnant, nonpregnant bitches, and bitches during abortion. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Thejll Kirchhoff, K.; Goericke-Pesch, S. Changes in serum progesterone concentrations in Bernese mountain dogs and Cavalier King Charles Spaniels during pregnancy. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 1850–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sontas, B.H.; Speroni, M.; Stelletta, C.; Günzel-Apel, A.R.; Romagnoli, S. Serum progesterone patterns in the pregnant bitch: A meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Canine and Feline Reproduction, Whistler, BC, Canada, 26-29 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hadley, J.C. Total unconjugated oestrogen and progesterone concentrations in peripheral blood during the oestrous cycle of the dog. Reproduction 1975, 44, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Concannon, P.W. Reproductive cycles of the domestic bitch. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 124, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Papa, P.C.; Hoffmann, B. The corpus luteum of the dog: Source and target of steroid hormones? Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011, 46, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Papa, P.C.; Kowalewski, M.P. Factors affecting the fate of the canine corpus luteum: Potentital contributors to pregnancy and non-pregnancy. Theriogenology 2020, 150, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Farstad, W. Bitch fertility after natural mating and after artifical insemination with fresh or frozen semen. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1984, 25, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baalbergen, T. Ovulation Timing in the Bitch: Conception Rate and Influencing Factors in 1401 Estrus Cycles. Master’s Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2021; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  43. Romagnoli, S.; Concannon, P.W. Clinical use of progestins in bitches and queens: A review. In Recent Advances in Small Animal Reproduction; Concannon, P.W., England, G., Verstegen, J., III, Linde Forsberg, C., Eds.; International Veterinary Information Service: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsutsui, T.; Hori, T.; Kirihara, N.; Kawakami, E.; Concannon, P.W. Relation between mating or ovulation and the duration of gestation in dogs. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 1706–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kutzler, M.A.; Mohammed, H.O.; Lamb, S.V.; Meyers-Wallen, V.N. Accuracy of canine parturition date prediciton from the initital rise in preovulatory progesterone concentration. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mir, F.; Billault, C.; Fontaine, E.; Sendra, J.; Fontbonne, A. Estimated pregnancy length from ovulation to parturition in the bitch and its influencing factors: A retrospective study in 162 pregnancies. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011, 46, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eilts, B.E.; Davidson, A.P.; Hosgood, G.; Paccamonti, D.L.; Baker, D.G. Factors affecting gestation duration in the bitch. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gavrilovic, B.B.; Andersson, K.; Linde Forsberg, C. Reproductive patterns in the domestic dog—A retrospective study of the Drever breed. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 783–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Borge, K.S.; Tønnessen, R.; Nødtvedt, A.; Indrebø, A. Litter size at birth in purebred dogs—A retrospective study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology 2011, 75, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Concannon, P.W.; McCann, J.P.; Temple, M. Biology and endocrinology of ovulation, pregnancy and parturition in the dog. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1989, 39, 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  51. Okkens, A.C.; Teunissen, J.M.; Van Osch, W.; Van Den Brom, W.E.; Dieleman, S.J.; Kooistra, H.S. Influence of litter size and breed on the duration of gestation in dogs. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2001, 57, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  52. Okkens, A.C.; Hekerman, T.W.M.; De Vogel, J.W.A.; Van Haaften, B. Influence of litter size and breed on variation in length of gestation in the dog. Vet. Q. 1993, 15, 160–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Athorn, R.Z.; Stott, P.; Bouwman, E.G.; Chen, T.Y.; Kennaway, D.J.; Langendijk, P. Effect of feeding level on luteal function and progesterone concentration in the vena cava during early pregnancy in gilts. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2013, 25, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Varma, M.; Chai, J.-K.; Meguid, M.M.; Laviano, A.; Gleason, J.R.; Yang, Z.-J.; Blaha, V. Effect of estradiol and progesterone on daily rhythm in food intake and feeding patterns in Fischer rats. Physiol. Behav. 1999, 68, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Asarian, L.; Geary, N. Modulation of appetite by gonadal steroid hormones. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Thuróczy, J.; Wölfling, A.; Tibold, A.; Balogh, L.; Jánoki, G. A; Solti, L Effect of anticoagulants and sampling time on results of progesterone determination in canine blood samples. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2003, 38, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Marinelli, L.; Rota, A.; Carnier, P.; Da Dalt, L.; Gabai, G. Factors affecting progesterone production in corpora lutea from pregnant and diestrous bitches. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 114, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Scheduling of examinations T1 to T3 over the course of pregnancy.
Figure 1. Scheduling of examinations T1 to T3 over the course of pregnancy.
Animals 11 03369 g001
Figure 2. P4 concentrations of pregnant and non-pregnant bitches at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32, T3 = d52–d60 post-ovulation) during pregnancy, with the asterisk (*) marking the examination with a significant difference among the groups. Each box displays the median P4 concentration as the thick line in the middle, with the upper and lower quartiles representing the limits of the box. The whiskers show the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 2. P4 concentrations of pregnant and non-pregnant bitches at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32, T3 = d52–d60 post-ovulation) during pregnancy, with the asterisk (*) marking the examination with a significant difference among the groups. Each box displays the median P4 concentration as the thick line in the middle, with the upper and lower quartiles representing the limits of the box. The whiskers show the minimum and maximum values.
Animals 11 03369 g002
Figure 3. Course of the individual bitches’ P4 concentrations at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32, T3 = d52–d60 post-ovulation). Animals were grouped according to pregnancy status. Pregnant animals were further grouped according to the extent of the decrease in P4 concentrations between timepoints T1 and T2 (group 1 decrease of <0.3 ng/mL per day, group 2 decrease between 0.3 and 0.7 ng/mL, group 3 decrease of >0.7 ng/mL).
Figure 3. Course of the individual bitches’ P4 concentrations at the three examinations (T1 = d11–d19, T2 = d23–d32, T3 = d52–d60 post-ovulation). Animals were grouped according to pregnancy status. Pregnant animals were further grouped according to the extent of the decrease in P4 concentrations between timepoints T1 and T2 (group 1 decrease of <0.3 ng/mL per day, group 2 decrease between 0.3 and 0.7 ng/mL, group 3 decrease of >0.7 ng/mL).
Animals 11 03369 g003
Table 1. Literature review on previous publications about serum P4 concentrations in normal canine pregnancies. * German Shepherd, Rottweiler, Border Collie, Bernese Mountain Dog. *1 Golden Retriever, Irish Setter, Samoyed, English Bulldog, Hungarian Vizsla, Collie, Kerry Blue Terrier, Mastino. *2 Bernese Mountain Dog, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
Table 1. Literature review on previous publications about serum P4 concentrations in normal canine pregnancies. * German Shepherd, Rottweiler, Border Collie, Bernese Mountain Dog. *1 Golden Retriever, Irish Setter, Samoyed, English Bulldog, Hungarian Vizsla, Collie, Kerry Blue Terrier, Mastino. *2 Bernese Mountain Dog, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
Number (Breed)Study ConclusionReference
6 (Beagle)pregnant and non-pregnant P4 values were very similar[22]
3 (Beagle)P4 rose during estrus and remained increased for most of metestrus[23]
9 (Beagle)P4 peak at 20–25 days, then decreased until parturition[24]
12 (Beagle)P4 peak around day 25 after LH peak, declined from day 30 on[4]
3 (Beagle,
Crossbred)
P4 peak 18 days after mating, then declined[25]
6 (German
Shepherd,
Greyhound)
no consistent P4 pattern in all bitches until 5th week, then gradually declining[26]
3 (Labrador
Retriever)
P4 peak within few days from estradiol peak, then decline (undetectable in one bitch 10 days before parturition)[27]
8 (Beagle)P4 peak day 14 after mating, decreased from day 35 on[28]
7 (Labrador
Retriever)
P4 peak at day 6, remaining elevated for 9 weeks, then declining[29]
10 (Labrador
Retriever, Beagle)
P4 remained high through 5–6 weeks, then declined[30]
9 (Labrador
Retriever)
highest P4 values from 2nd through 5th week, then declined[31]
5 (Labrador
Retriever)
diurnal differences from weeks 3 to 6; decline from week 3–4 on[5]
8 (Crossbred)P4 peak at days 18–20, declined from day 30 on[32]
11 (German Shepherd)P4 peak at days 5–15, then declined[13]
5 (Beagle)P4 peak at days 5–15, then declined[33]
15 (breed not specified)P4 peak in 4th week, then declined[6]
12 (*)P4 peak at days 12–18, then declined[14]
14 (*1)P4 peak in 2nd week, declined from 4th week on[34]
12 (*2)P4 19.2 ± 4.3/22.2 ± 3.9 ng/mL at days 23 to 29, 6.0 ± 1.3/8.7 ± 7.1 ng/mL at days 50 to 54, 4. ± 1.2/5.3 ± 2.8 ng/mL at days 55 to 59 in BMD and CKCS respectively[35]
Table 2. Effects of different parameters (weight, age, parity, breed group) on litter size in dogs (expressed as median with range (min–max)) and gestation length (expressed as mean with range (min–max)).
Table 2. Effects of different parameters (weight, age, parity, breed group) on litter size in dogs (expressed as median with range (min–max)) and gestation length (expressed as mean with range (min–max)).
GroupnLitter Sizep-ValueGestation Length (days)p-Value
Weight <0.001 0.13
≤7 kg114 (2–6)62.5 (60–64)
7.1–14 kg296 (1–10)62.6 (59–65)
14.1–32 kg356 (1–10)63.3 (60–68)
>32 kg239 (2–13)62.8 (59–65)
Age 0.03 0.22
<2 years195 (1–12)63.1 (61–67)
2–3 years206 (1–13)62.7 (60–68)
3–4 years198 (3–13)62.4 (59–65)
>4 years406 (1–13)63.2 (59 -65)
Parity 0.05 0.94
0–2 litters916 (1–13)62.9 (59–68)
3–4 litters63 (2–8)62.9 (61–65)
Breed group 0.01 0.02
Herding145 (1–13)63.1 (61–67)
Hound196 (3–13)62.6 (59–65)
Non-Sporting157 (3–12)62.7 (62–65)
Sporting158 (3–10)62.4 (60–64)
Terrier173 (1–12)63.7 (62–65)
Toy55 (3–6)61.6 (60–63)
Working138 (2–13)63.4 (61–68)
Table 3. P4 concentrations at T1 = d 11–d19, T2 = d23-d32 and T3 = d52-d60 grouped by weight, expressed as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL. Subjects for T1 and T2 included pregnant and non-pregnant bitches, while T3 only included pregnant bitches due to significant differences in P4 concentrations at T3 depicted in Figure 2.
Table 3. P4 concentrations at T1 = d 11–d19, T2 = d23-d32 and T3 = d52-d60 grouped by weight, expressed as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL. Subjects for T1 and T2 included pregnant and non-pregnant bitches, while T3 only included pregnant bitches due to significant differences in P4 concentrations at T3 depicted in Figure 2.
Weight GroupT1nT2nT3n
≤7 kg30.67 ± 7.031222.88 ± 4.82126.12 ± 2.2211
7.1–14 kg31.82 ± 5.903524.42 ± 7.04356.85 ± 2.2429
14.1–32 kg28.57 ± 5.934721.80 ± 5.50476.95 ± 2.2535
32.1–50 kg29.81 ± 7.252422.04 ± 7.07246.24 ± 2.0920
>50 kg26.82 ± 11.82521.80 ± 3.4256.99 ± 2.223
Table 4. P4 concentrations at T1 = d 11–d19, T2 = d23-d32 and T3 = d52-d60, grouped by breed, expressed as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL. Subjects for T1 and T2 included pregnant and non-pregnant bitches, while T3 only included pregnant bitches due to significant differences in P4 concentrations at T3 depicted in Figure 2.
Table 4. P4 concentrations at T1 = d 11–d19, T2 = d23-d32 and T3 = d52-d60, grouped by breed, expressed as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL. Subjects for T1 and T2 included pregnant and non-pregnant bitches, while T3 only included pregnant bitches due to significant differences in P4 concentrations at T3 depicted in Figure 2.
Breed GroupsT1
(p = 0.10)
nT2
(p = 0.002)
nT3
(p ≤ 0.001)
n
Herding27.27 ± 5.492019.10 ± 4.37205.26 ± 1.6214
Hound28.74 ± 7.462320.72 ± 5.59235.73 ± 2.0119
Non-Sporting32.85 ± 5.351625.43 ± 6.01167.98 ± 2.1415
Sporting28.52 ± 6.322021.75 ± 5.82206.60 ± 2.6515
Terrier31.83 ± 5.052026.22 ± 5.73207.71 ± 1.4717
Toy32.22 ± 4.36623.77 ± 5.2367.05 ± 1.605
Working30.08 ± 8.021823.59 ± 6.4186.72 ± 2.2513
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hinderer, J.; Lüdeke, J.; Riege, L.; Haimerl, P.; Bartel, A.; Kohn, B.; Weber, C.; Müller, E.; Arlt, S.P. Progesterone Concentrations during Canine Pregnancy. Animals 2021, 11, 3369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123369

AMA Style

Hinderer J, Lüdeke J, Riege L, Haimerl P, Bartel A, Kohn B, Weber C, Müller E, Arlt SP. Progesterone Concentrations during Canine Pregnancy. Animals. 2021; 11(12):3369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hinderer, Janna, Julia Lüdeke, Lisa Riege, Peggy Haimerl, Alexander Bartel, Barbara Kohn, Corinna Weber, Elisabeth Müller, and Sebastian P. Arlt. 2021. "Progesterone Concentrations during Canine Pregnancy" Animals 11, no. 12: 3369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop