Influence of the Milking Units on the Pulsation Curve in Dairy Sheep Milking
Department of Agricultural Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(7), 1213; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071213
Submission received: 18 June 2020
/
Revised: 10 July 2020
/
Accepted: 13 July 2020
/
Published: 17 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal System and Management)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
In dairy farms, the mechanical milking process represents one of the most delicate activities as it may affect the quantity and quality of the milk produced and the animals’ welfare. Mechanical milking systems can be designed with different components (milking units, liners, etc.) and configured with different operative parameters (vacuum level, pulsator rate, etc.) that may significantly influence the milking performances. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze nine milking units to evaluate the effects of the volume of the pulsation chamber, the touch point pressure of the liners and the operative parameters of the milking system, on the duration of the increasing and decreasing vacuum phases of the pulsation curve. The results obtained underlined that the characteristics of the milking units affected the pulsation curve. Specifically, the pulsation chamber volume and the pulsator rate were strictly related to the duration of the phase of milking and massage. Contrary to expectations, the touch point pressure of the milking liners was not related to the length of the increasing vacuum phase and the decreasing vacuum phase (phase “a” and “c”). This study underlined how the configuration of the mechanical milking system and the characteristics of the components installed may influence the proper length of each phase of the pulsation curve.
Abstract
Mechanical milking is a critical operation in ewe dairy farming where the operative parameters and the milking routine strongly influence milk production and animal welfare. The challenge in adapting dairy animals to the farm environmental conditions may cause illness and compromise the quality of the products. From this perspective, it is important to evaluate the technological and operational aspects that can influence milk quality and animal welfare. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the effects on the pulsation curve of several teat cup characteristics (volume of the pulsation chamber) at determined operating parameters (vacuum level and pulsator rate) recorded from nine different milking units. Moreover, the touch point pressure of different liners was measured. Data analysis showed that the sheep milking unit characteristics affected the pulsation curve significantly. The length of both the increasing vacuum phase and the decreasing vacuum phase (phase “a” and “c”, respectively), which affect the milking and massage phases, was directly related to the pulsation chamber volume (R2 = 0.86) and the pulsator rate. No relationship emerged between the touch point pressure and specific characteristics of the liners such as the material, the shape, the diameter, the length, or the extension of the body. Considering the delicate role that the pulsation plays in ensuring animal welfare during milking, it is important to take into account the complete configuration and operative characteristics of the milking units. This will ensure that the complex interaction between the pulsation system and the milking units is considered when planning and assembling milking systems.
1. Introduction
Mechanical milking is a critical operation in dairy farming where the operating parameters and the milking routine strongly influence milking labor, milk yield and animal welfare [1]. Thus, it is essential to carefully evaluate the main technological and practical aspects of the mechanical milking process. Moreover, the differences in udder and teat morphology among dairy animals make it necessary to study and evaluate species-specific milking procedures and machine parameters [2].
Among the various components of a milking system, the milking units have the greatest influence on the efficiency of milking, efficiency being seen as the complete emptying of the udder and a stable vacuum at the teat-end [3,4]. Other characteristics of the milking units are also important and influence the pulsation curve. These include the dimensions of the long and short pulse tubes, the volume of the pulsation chamber [5,6] and liners characteristics [7,8]. In fact, the pressure variance between the pulsation chamber and the liner interior during milking, in addition to the wall thickness, material and tension of the liners, affects the level of compression applied on teat tissues that helps to reduce the congestion or edema that might arise. As reported by Penry et al. [9], increasing liner compression reduces the effects of teat-end congestion, resulting in an increased milk flow rate and an increased canal cross sectional area at high levels of teat-end vacuum and milk-phase time. As also stated by Mein et al. [10], a compressive load (12 kPa) would be adequate to relieve congestion, where any additional compression provided by the collapsed liner would provide a slight benefit. Nowadays, dairy farmers have a large variety of liners to select from in order to achieve milking comfort and speed while ensuring the welfare of the animals. The main liners’ design features include several kinds of material and shapes which influence the milking performances. Moreover, Boast et al. [11] studied the variation in rubber chemistry and dynamic mechanical properties of the milking liner barrel with age and use in dairy cows.
Establishing the correct pulsator rate plays an important role in the well-being of milking animals, contributing to the prevention of edemas or congestion in the teats, reducing the number of new infections and limiting the pain, and thus discomfort, of the animals [12,13,14,15,16].
The efficiency of pulsation in ensuring the appropriate extraction of the milk and adequate massage of the teats depends on the dynamics of the pulsation curve, or, to be more precise, the duration of the increasing + milking (a + b) and decreasing + massage (c + d) phases of the curve.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5707:2007 standard [17] prescribes that for cows and water buffaloes, phase “b” (maximum vacuum phase) shall be not less than 30% of a pulsation cycle and phase “d” (minimum vacuum phase) shall be not less than 150 ms. The latter is the threshold under which there is a considerable increase in the thickness of the teats, a factor which may result in an increased probability of new infections [18,19,20]. At present there is no information on what should be the minimum times for the various phases of milking for sheep. However, given the greater sensitivity of sheep tissue, the results for cows may also be considered to be valid for sheep [21]. Normally it is advisable to limit the duration of phases “a” (increasing vacuum phase) and “c” (decreasing vacuum phase) in order to not reduce the phases of milking and massage, without, however, reducing them excessively. Too short intermediate phases do, indeed, cause a rapid fall in the vacuum inside the liners. This creates instability in the vacuum below the milking units, which could be one of the causes of mastitis [22]. In order to avoid prolonged milking time and prevent health problems, phase “a” should generally be between 15% and 20% of the whole cycle, while phase “c” should be between 12% and 15% [23].
Awareness of the influence of the milking units on the pulsation curve is of particular importance in sheep milking parlors because these often use different kinds of components when the maintenance is accomplished. Moreover, it is also important in mixed dairy farms, which raise both sheep and goat species, where the same operative parameters and milking parlor, with only one type of milking unit, are adopted.
This study presents the results of laboratory tests on nine milking units, for the mechanical milking of dairy sheep, to evaluate the effects of the volume of the pulsation chamber, the touch point pressure of the liners and the operative parameters of the milking system on the duration of the increasing and decreasing vacuum phases of the pulsation curve.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Milking Units
The laboratory tests were conducted on nine milking units (Figure 1). A single type of pulsator was used (EP100 DeLaval) at a constant pulsator ratio of 50%, in order to eliminate other variable factors which were not related to the operative vacuum, the pulsator frequency and the volume of the pulsation chamber.
Among the nine milking units adopted in this study, different dimensions, shapes and materials were selected. The principal characteristics of the milking units used in the tests are shown in Table 1. A precision caliper (CN15SR, Borletti) was used to measure the dimensions of the milking units adopted in the research trials. To determine the quantity of air which entered the pulsation chamber from the pulsator, the volume of the pulsation chamber, including the short pulsation tube, was measured with the liners closed because the diameter and length of the liners was different in different models.
A pulsation tube 120 cm long and with an internal diameter of 8 mm was used in all of the tests to connect the milking units to the pulsator. The short pulsation tube where the sensors were mounted had the same dimensions as the original one.
The pulsation curves were recorded at the “Centro prove conferme metrologiche” in Maccarese (Rome), of the Associazione Italiana Allevatori (Italian Association of Breeders).
2.2. Liner Touch Point Pressure Tests
To evaluate the influence of the liner characteristics on the pulsation curve, the touch point pressure of the liners was measured. The touch point pressure refers to the force to be applied to the liner’s walls to cause its closure. This test was carried out by means of a universal material testing stand (Lloyd Instruments LF Plus, Bognor Regis, UK), equipped with specific ONDIO software for the analysis and processing of results. The universal material testing stand consists of a probe, a variable-speed force-driving mechanism that moves the probe, and a load cell that quantifies the material’s resistance to the force applied.
The measurement was carried out by performing a compression test (Figure 2B) in which the force parameters (measuring range between 0.5 N and 100 N) and the stand crossbar speed (500 mm/min) were previously set. To carry out the compression tests, each milking liner was removed from the shell and reassembled on an adjustable extension tool, specifically made for reproducing the original extension conditions (Figure 2A).
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The two-way analysis of variance with replication was applied to elaborate on the data, analyzing the operative vacuum and the pulsator rate at two levels:
- Operative vacuum, 38 kPa and 44 kPa;
- pulsator rate, 120 cycles/min and 180 cycles/min.
The test levels for each factor were chosen on the basis that these values are used in more than 90% of the 5000 milking systems used in Sardinia [25].
The data were collected after a minimum of five completed and consecutive cycles of the pulsation curve [26] for each of the milking units tested, using a combination of two vacuum levels and pulsator rates. In this way the experiment measured four hypotheses for each milking unit, for an overall total of 36 tests. The pulsator ratio in these trials was set at 50%. The data were extrapolated for the duration of the increasing and decreasing vacuum phases “a” and “c”, as these conditioned the duration of the milking and massage phases “b” and “d”. Specifically, phase “a” represents the period when the vacuum in the pulsation chamber is increasing from 4 kPa to the maximum pulsation chamber vacuum minus 4 kPa; phase “c” represents the period when the vacuum in the pulsation chamber decreases from the maximum pulsation chamber vacuum minus 4 kPa to 4 kPa [27].
A linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of the volume of the pulsation chamber on the duration of phases “a” and “c”.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Operative Vacuum Level and Pulsation Frequency
The analysis of the data collected for each test (Table 2 and Table 3) showed that the average percentage time of phase “c” (12.9%) was shorter than phase “a” (17.7%). The combination of operative parameters that minimized the duration of the “a” and “c” phases was a vacuum of 38 kPa and a pulsator rate of 120 cycles/min, while the maximum values were registered at 44 kPa and 180 cycles/min. In tests at 120 cycles/min the average time of phases “a” and “c” were 14.3% and 10.5%, respectively. In tests at 180 cycles/min the results were 21.1% for phase “a” and 15.4% for phase “c”.
Inside these average values there was a noteworthy disparity among the various milking units. When operating at a frequency of 120 cycles/min, in about two thirds of the milking units the duration of the “a” and “c” phases was under the minimum value of 15% as recommended for dairy cows by a previous study [22]. When the pulsator rate was 180 cycles/min, the duration of phase “a” is excessive (more than 20%) in a little less than half of the milking units. The same is true for phase “c”, although to a lesser extent; the duration of phase “c” was between 12% and 15%. It seems clear that when the duration of the increasing and decreasing phases is greater than the milking and massage phases, as in the case of group G9 at 44 kPa-180 cycles/min, then the pulsation curve cannot be considered to be optimal [23]. Thus, by reducing the milking phase “b”, the total milking time will increase, while by reducing the rest phase “c”, the health status of the teat might be compromised [22].
Analysis of the variance is shown in Table 4 and Table 5. The pulsator rate has a significant effect (p < 0.001) on both “a” and “c” phases. On the other hand, the effects of changes in the vacuum level did not affect the two phases considered. The results highlight the lack of interaction between the vacuum and the pulsator rate. This indicates that the effects of vacuum and pulsator rate are simply additive and that when they operate in conjunction there is no additional effect.
3.2. Pulsation Chamber Volume and Milking Liner’s Touch Point Pressure
The length of the “a” and “c” phases of the pulsation curve were also conditioned by the volume of air in the pulsation chamber. As can be seen from the graph in Figure 3, there was a strong correlation between the two parameters (R2 = 0.86 for phases “a” and “c”). For example, the length of phase “a” doubled when the volume went from 55.1 mL to 116.1 mL. Similar results were observed for phase “c”.
The force necessary to compress the liners, which was on average equal to 16.90 N, differed significantly between the models considered and was between a minimum of 12.85 N and a maximum of 20.72 N for the G6 and G5 models, respectively (Table 6). No relationship emerged between the touch point pressure and a specific characteristic of the liners such as the constituent material, the shape, the diameter, the length or extension of the body.
From the analysis of the results, the touch point pressure of the milking liners did not significantly modify the pulsation cycle, in fact the diagrams in Figure 4 show the low correlation between the two parameters (R2 = 0.009 for phase “a” and R2 = 0.020 for phase ”c”).
4. Conclusions
The study allowed us to define the influence of specific physical characteristics of milking units and the operative parameters of the milking system on the pulsation curve. The factors which influenced phases “a” and “c” were the pulsator rate and the volume of the pulsation chamber. Contrary to prior expectations, the touch point pressure of the milking liners did not significantly affect the pulsation, in addition, increasing the vacuum level from 38 kPa to 44 kPa did not affect the two phases considered (“a” and “c”).
Comparison of the different milking units showed that there was variation in the performance of the same pulsation system depending on the milking units used. With a pulsator rate of 120 cycles/min, in the milking units with a pulsation chamber volume of less than 85 mL, the duration of the “a” and “c” phases was too short to guarantee a suitable pulsator rate. In such conditions, there is a risk that the abrupt opening of the liners could result in the milk returning from the short tube into the teats.
Considering the delicate role that the pulsation plays in ensuring animal welfare during milking, it may be important to properly certify the complete configuration and operative characteristics of the milking units. This will ensure that the complex interaction between the pulsation system and the milking unit is taken into consideration when planning and assembling the milking systems.
Author Contributions
M.C., G.T. and A.P. conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. G.T. and M.C. collected the data. M.C., G.T. and A.P. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was not supported by external funding.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the staff in the “Centro prove conferme metrologiche”, Maccarese (Rome), of the Italian Association of Breeders (AIA) for their valuable help during data collection and analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Odorčić, M.; Rasmussen, M.D.; Paulrud, C.O.; Bruckmaier, R.M. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows. Animal 2019, 13, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zucali, M.; Tamburini, A.; Sandrucci, A.; Gislon, G.; Bava, L. Effect of vacuum level on milk flow and vacuum stability in Alpine goat milking. Small Ruminant Res. 2019, 171, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pazzona, A.; Murgia, L. Mungitura ovini: Sistema innovativo Fisiomilk. Macch. Mot. Agric. Edagricole Ed. 1996, 9, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
- Peris, C.; Diaz, J.R.; Torres, A.; Fernandez, N.; Rodriguez, M. Effect of variable traction on the teat-cup during machine milking of ewes. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, Budapest, Hungary, 14–20 May 1993; pp. 385–400. [Google Scholar]
- Akam, D.N.; Spencer, S.B. Design and operation of milking machine components. In Machine Milking and Lactation; Bramley, A.J., Dodd, F.H., Mein, G., Bramley, J.A., Eds.; Insight Books: Burlington, VT, USA, 1992; pp. 141–196. [Google Scholar]
- Murgia, L.; Pazzona, A. Influenza di Alcuni Parametri Dimensionali e Operativi Dell’impianto di Mungitura Sulla Dinamica Della Curva di Pulsazione. In Proceedings of the VII Convegno Nazionale di Ingegneria Agraria (AIIA), Vieste, Foggia, Italy, 11–14 September 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Penry, J.F.; Leonardi, S.; Upton, J.; Thompson, P.D.; Reinemann, D.J. Assessing liner performance using on-farm milk meters. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6609–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alejandro, M.; Roca, A.; Romero, G.; Díaz, J.R. Effects of overmilking and liner type and characteristics on teat tissue in small ruminants. J. Dairy Res. 2014, 81, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Penry, J.F.; Upton, J.; Leonardi, S.; Thompson, P.D.; Reinemann, D.J. A method for assessing liner performance during the peak milk flow period. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mein, G.A.; Williams, D.M.; Thiel, C.C. Compressive load applied by the teat cup liner to the bovine teat. J. Dairy Res. 1987, 54, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boast, D.; Hale, M.; Turner, D.; Hillerton, J.E. Variation in Rubber Chemistry and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of the Milking Liner Barrel with Age. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 2247–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capuco, A.V.; Mein, G.A.; Nickerson, S.C.; Jack, L.J.; Wood, D.L.; Bright, S.A.; Aschenbrenner, R.A.; Miller, R.H.; Bitman, J. Influence of pulsation less milking on teat canal keratin and mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamann, J. The milking machine and mastitis. In Proceedings of the 5th IDF (International Dairy Federation) Mastitis Congress, Symposium on Immunology of Ruminant Mammary Gland, Stresa, Italy, 11–14 June 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Mein, G.; Reinemann, D.; O’Callaghan, E.; Ohnstad, I. Where the rubber meets the teat and what happens to milking characteristics. In Proceedings of the IDF Symposium: 100 Years with Liners and Pulsators in Machine Milking, Bruges, Belgium, 12 September 2003; Bull. No. 388. pp. 431–446. [Google Scholar]
- Upton, J.; Reinemann, D.J.; Penry, J.F.; Thompson, P.D. A quarter milking analysis device—Development and demonstration. Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 147, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, G.; Peris, C.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Diaz, J.R. Effects of machine milking on udder health in dairy ewes. Small Ruminant Res. 2020, 188, 106096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 5707:2007. Milking Machine Installations—Construction and Performance; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Upton, J.; Penry, J.F.; Rasmussen, M.D.; Thompson, P.D.; Reinemann, D.J. Effect of pulsation rest phase duration on teat end congestion. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 3958–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hamman, J.; Mein, G.A. Teat thickness changes may provide biological test for effective pulsation. J. Dairy Res. 1996, 63, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Østerås, O.; Ronningen, O.; Sandvik, L.; Waage, S. Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health. J. Dairy Res. 1995, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eitam, M.; Hamman, J. Relevance of machine-induced teat tissue reactions in cows for improvement of machine milking in small ruminants. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, Budapest, Hungary, 14–20 May 1993; pp. 401–408. [Google Scholar]
- Mein, G.A. Milk flow from the bovine teat in relation to movement of the teatcup liner. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 1977, 32, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
- Billon, P.; Gaudin, V. Influence of the duration of a and c phase of pulsation on the milking characteristics and on udder health of dairy cows. Physiol. Tech. Asp. Mach. Milk. ICAR Tech. 2001, 7, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
- Ente Italiano di Normazione (UNI) 11008: 2002. Impianti per la Mungitura meccanica Delle Specie Ovina e Caprina—Terminologia, Requisiti Costruttivi e Prestazionali; Rome, Italy, 2002.
- Pazzona, A.; Murgia, L.; Caria, M. Stato attuale degli impianti per la mungitura di ovini e caprini. In Informatore Zootecnico; Edagricole Editore: Milan, Italy, 2003; Volume 12, pp. 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 6690: 2007. Milking Machine Installations—Mechanical Tests; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 3918: 2007. Milking Machine Installations—Vocabulary; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Milking units with different characteristics (G1–G9) adopted in the experimental trials.
Figure 2.
Universal material testing stand LF Plus and liner extension tool (A) while testing liner’s touch point pressure (B).
Figure 2.
Universal material testing stand LF Plus and liner extension tool (A) while testing liner’s touch point pressure (B).
Figure 3.
Pulsation chamber volume and length of phases “a” (A) and “c” (B) (p < 0.001).
Figure 4.
Correlation between the touch point pressure and the length of phase ”a” (A) and ”c” (B).
Table 1.
Main characteristics and dimensions of the milking units adopted in the research trials.
| Milking Units | Length of the Shell (mm) | Body of the Liners | Pulsation Chamber Volume (mL) b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | Extension (%) | Diameter (mm) a | Shape | Material | |||
| G1 | 103 | 93 | 10.9 | 190 | conical | silicon | 55.1 |
| G2 | 104 | 101 | 2.8 | 200 | cylindrical | rubber | 80.1 |
| G3 | 105 | 101 | 3.9 | 180 | cylindrical | rubber | 80.8 |
| G4 | 104 | 101 | 2.8 | 200 | cylindrical | rubber | 81.1 |
| G5 | 105 | 95 | 10.6 | 180 | cylindrical | silicon | 84.1 |
| G6 | 109 | 102 | 7.4 | 18 | cylindrical | silicon | 92.8 |
| G7 | 107 | 100 | 7.0 | 18 | cylindrical | silicon | 98.8 |
| G8 | 134 | 124 | 8.5 | 21 | conical | rubber | 109.1 |
| G9 | 129 | 114 | 13.2 | 22 | cylindrical | silicon | 116.1 |
a Measured at 50 mm from the edge of the mouth [24]; b Measured with the liners closed and including the short pulsation tube.
Table 2.
Results obtained for each milking unit tested for phase ”a” length (%) at different operative vacuum levels and pulsator rates.
Table 2.
Results obtained for each milking unit tested for phase ”a” length (%) at different operative vacuum levels and pulsator rates.
| Milking Units | Operative Parameters Vacuum (kPa)-Pulsator Rate (cycles/min) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38–120 | 38–180 | 44–120 | 44–180 | ||
| G1 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 16.9 | 13.5 |
| G2 | 11.7 | 17.2 | 12.8 | 19.1 | 15.2 |
| G3 | 12.1 | 18.0 | 13.4 | 19.6 | 15.8 |
| G4 | 11.9 | 18.1 | 13.1 | 19.7 | 15.7 |
| G5 | 12.0 | 17.7 | 13.4 | 19.7 | 15.7 |
| G6 | 16.1 | 20.08 | 15.0 | 21.8 | 18.4 |
| G7 | 13.2 | 20.5 | 14.8 | 21.9 | 17.6 |
| G8 | 17.9 | 25.8 | 18.7 | 27.6 | 22.5 |
| G9 | 19.5 | 28.0 | 20.1 | 31.0 | 24.7 |
| Mean ± SD | 13.9 ± 3.2 | 20.2 ± 4.2 | 14.7 ± 2.9 | 21.9 ± 4.5 | 17.7 ± 3.7 |
Table 3.
Results obtained for each milking unit tested for phase “c” length (%) at different operative vacuum levels and pulsator rates.
Table 3.
Results obtained for each milking unit tested for phase “c” length (%) at different operative vacuum levels and pulsator rates.
| Milking Units | Operative Parameters Vacuum (kPa)-Pulsator Rate (cycles/min) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38–120 | 38–180 | 44–120 | 44–180 | ||
| G1 | 7.3 | 10.8 | 7.7 | 11.4 | 9.3 |
| G2 | 8.9 | 12.9 | 9.6 | 14.3 | 11.4 |
| G3 | 8.6 | 12.6 | 9.4 | 13.9 | 11.1 |
| G4 | 8.8 | 13.0 | 9.6 | 14.1 | 11.4 |
| G5 | 8.8 | 13.0 | 9.8 | 14.4 | 11.5 |
| G6 | 11.5 | 16.5 | 12.2 | 18.0 | 14.6 |
| G7 | 9.7 | 14.5 | 10.5 | 15.7 | 12.6 |
| G8 | 12.9 | 18.7 | 13.6 | 20.0 | 16.3 |
| G9 | 14.2 | 20.8 | 15.1 | 22.0 | 18.0 |
| Mean ± SD | 10.1 ± 2.3 | 14.8 ± 3.3 | 10.8 ± 2.3 | 16.0 ± 3.4 | 12.9 ± 2.8 |
Table 4.
Statistical Analysis of Variance results for phase “a” (%).
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Test Statistic | p-Value | F crit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 410.737 | 1 | 410.738 | 29.204 | <0.001 | 7.499 |
| Vacuum | 14.951 | 1 | 14.951 | 1.063 | 0.310 | 7.499 |
| Frequency × Vacuum | 1.867 | 1 | 1.867 | 0.133 | 0.718 | 7.499 |
| Within | 450.055 | 32 | 14.064 | |||
| Total | 877.612 | 35 |
Table 5.
Statistical Analysis of Variance results for phase “c” (%).
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Test Statistic | p-Value | F crit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 217.071 | 1 | 217.071 | 26.582 | <0.001 | 7.499 |
| Vacuum | 8.801 | 1 | 8.801 | 1.077 | 0.307 | 7.499 |
| Frequency × Vacuum | 0.490 | 1 | 0.490 | 0.060 | 0.808 | 7.499 |
| Within | 261.313 | 32 | 8.166 | |||
| Total | 487.675 | 35 |
Table 6.
Compression tests carried out on milking liners per phase “a” and “c”.
| Test | Milking Liners | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 | G7 | G8 | G9 | |
| Average touch point pressure (N) * | 13.05 ± 0.06 | 17.89 ± 0.07 | 19.11 ± 0.06 | 17.89 ± 0.06 | 20.72 ± 0.45 | 12.89 ± 0.11 | 18.41 ± 0.19 | 14.02 ± 0.03 | 18.19 ± 0.05 |
* Average among four repetitions.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Caria, M.; Todde, G.; Pazzona, A. Influence of the Milking Units on the Pulsation Curve in Dairy Sheep Milking. Animals 2020, 10, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071213
AMA Style
Caria M, Todde G, Pazzona A. Influence of the Milking Units on the Pulsation Curve in Dairy Sheep Milking. Animals. 2020; 10(7):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071213
Chicago/Turabian StyleCaria, Maria, Giuseppe Todde, and Antonio Pazzona. 2020. "Influence of the Milking Units on the Pulsation Curve in Dairy Sheep Milking" Animals 10, no. 7: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071213
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
