Dietary Calcium to Digestible Phosphorus Ratio for Optimal Growth Performance and Bone Mineralization in Growing and Finishing Pigs
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Diets
2.2. Animals and Experimental Procedures
2.3. Data and Sample Collection
2.4. Chemical Analysis of Samples
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Diets
3.2. Growth Performance
3.3. Urinary and Blood Serum Concentrations and Bone Traits
4. Discussion
4.1. Effect of The Digestible Phosphorus Levels
4.2. Effect of The Calcium Levels
4.3. Potential of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Technology without Bone Dissection to Replace other Bone Mineralisation Traits
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cordell, D.; Drangert, J.O.; White, S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suttle, N. Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 4th ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2010; pp. 122–167. [Google Scholar]
- Létourneau-Montminy, M.P.; Jondreville, C.; Sauvant, D.; Narcy, A. Meta-analysis of phosphorus utilization by growing pigs: effect of dietary phosphorus, calcium and exogenous phytase. Animal 2012, 6, 1590–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oberleas, D.; Muhrer, M.E.; O’Dell, B.L. Dietary metal-complexing agents and zinc availability in the rat. J. Nutr. 1966, 90, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gonzàlez-Vega, J.C.; Walk, C.L.; Murphy, M.R.; Stein, H.H. Requirement for digestible calcium by 25 to 50 kg pigs at different dietary concentrations of phosphorus as indicated by growth performance, bone ash concentration, and calcium and phosphorus balances. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 5272–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagos, L.V.; Walk, C.L.; Murphy, M.R.; Stein, H.H. Effects of dietary digestible calcium on growth performance and bone ash concentration in 50- to 85-kg growing pigs fed diets with different concentrations of digestible phosphorus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 247, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vier, C.M.; Dritz, S.S.; Tokach, M.D.; De Rouchey, J.M.; Goodband, R.D.; Gonçalves, M.A.D.; Orlando, U.A.D.; Bergstrom, J.R.; Woodworth, J.C. Calcium to phosphorus ratio requirement of 26- to 127-kg pigs fed diets with or without phytase. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4041–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agroscope. Fütterungsempfehlungen für Schweine. Available online: https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/de/home/services/dienste/futtermittel/fuetterungsempfehlungen-schweine (accessed on 1 February 2018).
- Gesellschaft für Ernährung. Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung von Schweinen; DLG Verlag: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Bikker, P.; Blok, M.C. Phosphorus and Calcium Requirements of Growing Pigs and Sows; Wageningen Livestock Research (CVB documentation report): Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, A.D.; Conway, J.M.; Potts, W.J.E. Body Composition Analysis of Pigs by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 2663–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marcoux, M.; Bernier, J.F.; Pomar, C. Estimation of Canadian and European lean yields and composition of pig carcasses by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norris, S.A.; Pettifor, J.M.; Gray, D.A.; Biscardi, A.; Buffenstein, R. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae. J. Clin. Densitom. 2000, 3, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, A.M.; Heller, P.; Waldmann, K.-H.; Wolf, P.; Kamphues, J.; Förster, M. Bone mineralization in boars of two commercial sow lines using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Züchtungskunde 2004, 76, 94–107. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, D.H.; Mc Evoy, F.J.; Madsen, M.T.; Jensen, J.B.; Svalastoga, E. Relationship between bone strength and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Agroscope. Referenzwerte Einzelfutter. Available online: https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/de/home/services/dienste/futtermittel/fuetterungsempfehlungen-schweine (accessed on 1 February 2018).
- Bee, G.; Jacot, S.; Guex, G.; Biolley, C. Effects of two supplementation levels of linseed combined with CLA or tallow on meat quality traits and fatty acid profile of adipose and different muscle tissues in slaughter pigs. Animal 2008, 2, 800–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schlegel, P.; Gutzwiller, A. Effect of dietary calcium level and source on mineral utilisation by piglets fed diets containing exogenous phytase. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, e165–e174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bracher, A.; Spring, P. Rohproteingehalte in Schweinefutter - Bestandesaufnahme 2008. Agrarforsch. Schweiz 2011, 2, 244–251. [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz-Ascacibar, I.; Stoll, P.; Bee, G.; Schlegel, P. Dynamics of the mineral composition and deposition rates in the empty body of entire males, castrates and female pigs. Animal 2019, 13, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Swiss Federal Council. Ordonnance du 7 Décembre 1998 sur les Paiements Directs Versés dans l’agriculture, Art. 6. Available online: www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19983379/index (accessed on 1 November 2019).
- Castaing, J.; Paboeuf, F.; Skiba, F.; Chauvel, M.; Cazaux, J.G.; van Milgen, J.; Jondreville, C. Estimation of the apparent digestible P requirements in growing-finishing pigs through the analysis of recent growth trials results. In Proceedings of the Journées Recherche Porcine, Paris, France, 4–6 February 2003; IFIP, INRA: Paris, France, 2003; pp. 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Hastad, C.W.; Dritz, S.S.; Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Nelssen, J.L.; de Rouchey, J.M.; Boyd, R.D.; Johnston, M.E. Phosphorus requirements of growing-finishing pigs reared in a commercial environment. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 2945–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, W.F.; Lynch, P.B.; O’Doherty, J.V. Compensatory effect of dietary phosphorus on performance of growing pigs and development of bone mineral density assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Livest. Sci. 2011, 138, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sørensen, K.U.; Tauson, A.–H.; Poulsen, H.D. Long term differentiated phosphorus supply from below to above requirement affects nutrient balance and retention, body weight gain and bone growth in growing-finishing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2018, 211, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, T.; Fernández, J.A.; Engberg, R.M. Bone turnover in growing pigs fed three levels of dietary calcium. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 80, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Létourneau-Montminy, M.P.; Lovatto, P.A.; Pomar, C. Apparent total tract digestibility of dietary calcium and phosphorus and their efficiency in bone mineral retention are affected by body mineral status in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 3914–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Larsen, T.; Sandström, B. Effect of dietary calcium level on mineral and trace-element utilization from a rapeseed (Brassica-Napus L) diet fed to ileum fistulated pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 1993, 69, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Windisch, W.; Kirchgessner, M. Effect of phytase on apparent digestibility and gross utilization of Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn at different levels of calcium supply in piglets and broilers. Agribiol. Res. 1995, 49, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Jolliff, J.S.; Mahan, D.C. Effect of dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on the total tract digestibility of innate and supplemental organic and inorganic microminerals in a corn-soybean meal based diet of grower pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 2775–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morgan, D.P.; Young, E.P.; Earle, I.P.; Davey, R.J.; Stevenson, J.W. Effects of dietary calcium and zinc on calcium, phosphorus and zinc retention in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1969, 29, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlegel, P.; Sauvant, D.; Jondreville, C. Bioavailability of zinc sources and their interaction with phytates in broilers and piglets. Animal 2013, 7, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schlegel, P.; Nys, Y.; Jondreville, C. Zinc availability and digestive zinc solubility in piglets and broilers fed diets varying in their phytate contents, phytase activity and supplemented zinc source. Animal 2010, 4, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Period | Grower | Finisher | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digestible P Level 1 | P− | P+ | P− | P+ | ||||||||
Ca:Digestible P Ratio | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 |
Barley | 575 | 575 | 575 | 575 | 575 | 575 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 |
Wheat | 179 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 246 | 246 | 246 | 246 | 246 | 246 |
Oats | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Wheat bran | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||||||
Expelled soybean meal | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 |
Potato protein | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | ||||||
Sugarbeet pulp dehydr. | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 |
Wheat starch | 29.2 | 26.0 | 23.2 | 21.8 | 17.8 | 14.0 | 39.2 | 37.3 | 35.0 | 32.0 | 29.0 | 25.8 |
Fat (tallow and lard) | 0.6 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 5.6 | |
L-Lysine-HCl | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
DL-Methionine | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||
L-Threonine | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
L-Tryptophane | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||
Calcium carbonate | 7.6 | 9.4 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 11.2 | 13.4 | 5.5 | 6.8 | 8.1 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 10.2 |
Monocal. phosphate | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |||
Sodium chloride | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Vit. and min. premix 2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Binder 3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Col. maize cob pellets 4 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Microbial phytase 5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Period | Grower | Finisher | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digestible P Level 1 | P− | P+ | P− | P+ | ||||||||
Ca:Digestible P Ratio | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 |
Dry matter (g/kg) 2 | 896 | 899 | 898 | 887 | 891 | 888 | 894 | 892 | 893 | 884 | 889 | 886 |
Dig. energy (MJ/kg) 3 | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 12.9 | 13.3 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 12.8 |
Crude protein (g/kg) 2 | 164 | 165 | 165 | 156 | 160 | 158 | 127 | 127 | 128 | 130 | 129 | 128 |
Ash (g/kg) 2 | 37 | 39 | 40 | 42 | 44 | 47 | 34 | 35 | 37 | 40 | 40 | 43 |
Dig. lysine (g/kg) 3 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Dig. methionine (g/kg) 3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Dig. threonine (g/kg) 3 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Ca (g/kg) 2 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 6.3 |
P (g/kg) 2 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.3 |
Phytic P (g/kg) 2 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
Non phytic P (g/kg) 3 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
Phytase activity (U/kg) 2 | 746 | 722 | 704 | 794 | 775 | 850 | 919 | 895 | 877 | 993 | 991 | 837 |
Digestible P (g/kg) 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Ca:dP 3 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.6 |
Zn (mg/kg) 2 | 67 | 65 | 69 | 69 | 65 | 69 | 67 | 70 | 67 | 75 | 70 | 77 |
Item | Digestible P 1 | Ca:Digestible P | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P− | P+ | p-Value 2 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | p-Value 2 | SEM | |
N° | 36 | 48 | 24 | 36 | 24 | |||
BW, Initial (kg) | 23.2 | 23.2 | n.s. | 23.1 | 23.2 | 23.3 | n.s. | 0.58 |
BW, d 42 (kg) | 57.0 | 58.9 | n.s. | 58.5 | 57.7 | 57.6 | n.s. | 1.29 |
BW, final (kg) | 103.3 | 102.9 | n.s. | 102.8 | 103.4 | 103.0 | n.s. | 2.05 |
Carcass weight (kg) | 82.7 | 82.3 | n.s. | 82.1 | 82.8 | 82.5 | n.s. | 1.77 |
BW gain grower (g/d) | 827 | 866 | n.s. | 857 | 844 | 838 | n.s. | 22.3 |
BW gain finisher (g/d) | 978 | 924 | + | 927 | 965 | 962 | n.s. | 24.6 |
BW gain overall (g/d) | 898 | 893 | n.s. | 893 | 899 | 894 | n.s. | 20.8 |
FI grower (g/d) | 1807 | 1880 | n.s. | 1867 | 1840 | 1824 | n.s. | 61.4 |
FI finisher (g/d) | 3101 | 2951 | n.s. | 3015 | 3058 | 3005 | n.s. | 96.4 |
FI overall (g/d) | 2395 | 2362 | n.s. | 2395 | 2387 | 2353 | n.s. | 73.8 |
FCR grower (g/d) | 2.18 | 2.17 | n.s. | 2.17 | 2.18 | 2.17 | n.s. | 0.036 |
FCR finisher (g/d) | 3.17 | 3.19 | n.s. | 3.25 b | 3.16 a | 3.12 a | ** | 0.052 |
FCR overall (g/d) | 2.66 | 2.64 | n.s. | 2.68 | 2.65 | 2.62 | + | 0.038 |
Item | Digestible P1 | Ca:Digestible P | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P– | P+ | p-Value 2 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | p-Value 2 | SEM | |
N° | 36 | 48 | 24 | 36 | 24 | |||
Urine at slaughter 3 | ||||||||
pH | 7.53 | 7.56 | n.s. | 7.55 | 7.51 | 7.58 | n.s. | 0.084 |
Creatinine (mmol/L) | 7.27 | 8.05 | n.s. | 7.78 | 7.22 | 7.98 | n.s. | 1.141 |
Ca (mol/mol creatinine) | 0.07 | 0.09 | n.s. | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | n.s. | 0.021 |
P (mol/mol creatinine) | 1.09 | 1.24 | n.s. | 1.42a | 1.00b | 1.07b | ** | 0.146 |
Blood serum | ||||||||
Ca (mmol/L) on day 42 | 2.88 | 2.85 | n.s. | 2.85 | 2.86 | 2.89 | n.s. | 0.030 |
P (mmol/L) on day 42 | 2.53 | 2.49 | n.s. | 2.53 | 2.52 | 2.46 | n.s. | 0.043 |
Ca (mmol/L) at slaughter | 2.92 | 2.88 | n.s. | 2.87 | 2.94 | 2.89 | n.s. | 0.043 |
P (mmol/L) at slaughter | 3.10 | 3.08 | n.s. | 3.13 | 3.03 | 3.12 | n.s. | 0.075 |
Item | Digestible P1 | Ca:Digestible P | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P– | P+ | p-Value 2 | 2.2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.8:1 | p-Value 2 | SEM | |
N° | 36 | 48 | 24 | 36 | 24 | |||
Metacarpus III and IV | ||||||||
Weight, defatted (g DM) | 30.6 | 32.0 | n.s. | 30.8 | 31.6 | 31.6 | n.s. | 0.95 |
Ash (g) | 16.9 | 18.3 | * | 17.3 | 17.7 | 17.9 | n.s. | 0.54 |
Ash (g/kg DM) | 555y | 573x | *** | 561b | 559b | 570a | * | 4.1 |
Ca (g/kg DM) | 207y | 218x | ** | 215 | 210 | 213 | n.s. | 3.3 |
P (g/kg DM) | 98y | 102x | * | 101 | 99 | 100 | n.s. | 1.8 |
Zn (mg/kg DM) | 114 | 118 | n.s. | 116 | 116 | 117 | n.s. | 4.2 |
BMC (g) 3 | 17.1 | 18.6 | * | 17.3 | 18.0 | 18.2 | n.s. | 0.49 |
Bone area (cm2) | 22.8 | 22.9 | n.s. | 22.7 | 23.2 | 22.8 | n.s. | 0.41 |
BMD (g/cm2) 3 | 0.754 | 0.806 | *** | 0.763b | 0.779ab | 0.797a | ** | 0.014 |
Metacarpus III | ||||||||
Weight (g) | 22.0 | 23.1 | n.s. | 22.2 | 22.7 | 22.8 | n.s. | 0.56 |
Volume (cm3) | 18.0 | 18.3 | n.s. | 18.0 | 18.4 | 18.1 | n.s. | 0.46 |
Density (g/cm3) | 1.22y | 1.26x | * | 1.23b | 1.23b | 1.26a | * | 0.013 |
BMC (g) 3 | 8.9 | 9.7 | * | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.5 | n.s. | 0.26 |
Bone area (cm2) | 11.6 | 11.7 | n.s. | 11.6 | 11.7 | 11.6 | n.s. | 0.21 |
BMD (g/cm2) 3 | 0.773 | 0.827 | ** | 0.783b | 0.801ab | 0.816a | * | 0.014 |
Metacarpus IV | ||||||||
Mid-section area (mm2) 4 | 169 | 162 | n.s. | 168 | 165 | 164 | n.s. | 6.5 |
Maximal load (N) | 1580y | 1766x | ** | 1624b | 1635ab | 1757a | * | 67.8 |
BMC (g) 3 | 8.2 | 8.8 | * | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.7 | n.s. | 0.25 |
Bone area (cm2) | 11.3 | 11.2 | n.s. | 11.1 | 11.4 | 11.2 | n.s. | 0.21 |
BMD (g/cm2) 3 | 0.734 | 0.785 | ** | 0.743b | 0.757ab | 0.778a | * | 0.015 |
Front Foot | ||||||||
BMC (g) 3 | 38.8y | 41.9x | * | 39.2 | 40.7 | 41.1 | + | 0.99 |
Bone area (cm2) | 62.9 | 65.0 | n.s. | 63.6 | 64.4 | 63.8 | n.s. | 1.11 |
BMD (g/cm2) 3 | 0.618y | 0.644x | * | 0.616b | 0.632ab | 0.644a | * | 0.010 |
Parameters | Intercept | Slope | Pearson | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXA | Physical and Chemical | Coeff. | p-Value 1 | Coeff. | p-Value 1 | R2 | SE | R |
Mc III and IV BMD (g/cm2) | Mc III and IV ash weight (g) | -1.01 | n.s. | 24.08 | *** | 0.52 | 1.404 | 0.71 |
Mc III and IV BMC (g) | Mc III and IV ash weight (g) | 0.28 | n.s. | 0.96 | *** | 0.81 | 0.867 | 0.91 |
Mc III BMD (g/cm2) | Mc III vol. density (g/cm3) | 0.92 | *** | 0.41 | *** | 0.26 | 0.043 | 0.51 |
Mc IV BMD (g/cm2) | Mc IV max. load (N) | -201 | n.s. | 2502 | *** | 0.57 | 151.8 | 0.75 |
Mc IV BMC (g) | Mc IV max. load (N) | 283 | n.s. | 167 | *** | 0.54 | 157.3 | 0.73 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Schlegel, P.; Gutzwiller, A. Dietary Calcium to Digestible Phosphorus Ratio for Optimal Growth Performance and Bone Mineralization in Growing and Finishing Pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020178
Schlegel P, Gutzwiller A. Dietary Calcium to Digestible Phosphorus Ratio for Optimal Growth Performance and Bone Mineralization in Growing and Finishing Pigs. Animals. 2020; 10(2):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020178
Chicago/Turabian StyleSchlegel, Patrick, and Andreas Gutzwiller. 2020. "Dietary Calcium to Digestible Phosphorus Ratio for Optimal Growth Performance and Bone Mineralization in Growing and Finishing Pigs" Animals 10, no. 2: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020178
APA StyleSchlegel, P., & Gutzwiller, A. (2020). Dietary Calcium to Digestible Phosphorus Ratio for Optimal Growth Performance and Bone Mineralization in Growing and Finishing Pigs. Animals, 10(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020178